46422-003: Greater Mekong Subregion East–West Economic

Environmental Safeguards Monitoring Report

4th Semiannual Report January 2019

MYA: Greater Mekong Subregion East–West Economic Corridor Eindu to Kawkareik Road Improvement

July – December 2018

Prepared by Pyunghwa Engineering Consultant, Ltd., in Joint Venture with Korea Expressway Corporation and Construction, Research, Design and Consultancy Co-operative Ltd for the Department of Highways, Ministry of Construction, and the Asian Development Bank.

This environmental safeguards monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR MINISTRY OF CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS

EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Loan No.: 3310-MYA / 8294

4TH SEMI-ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARDS MONITORING REPORT (July to December 2018)

JANUARY 2019

Construction Supervision Consultant (CSC): PEC/KEC JV in association with CRDCC Myanmar

Table of Contents

Acronyms and Abbreviations 3 1.0 Introduction 4 2.0 Construction Contracts and Activities 5 2.1 Status of Contracts 5 2.2 Mobilization 6 2.3 Project Progress 7 3.0 Status of Compliance to Loan Agreement Environmental Safeguards 8 Provisions 4.0 Monitoring of IEE EMP Compliance 11 4.1 Contractor’s Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) 11 4.2 Compliance with Mitigating Measures 11 4.3 Environmental Quality Monitoring 15 5.0 Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations 21 5.1 Summary and Conclusions 21 5.2 Ranking of Overall Progress of Implementing Environmental 21 Safeguards 5.3 Recommendations 22 Annexes Annex 1 Status of the Consultant's Mobilization (July to December 2018) 23 Annex 2 Status of the Contractor’s Mobilization (July to December 2018) 26 Annex 3 Status of the Contractor’s Equipment (July to December 2018) 28 Annex 4 One Day Workshop for REGDP 30 Annex 5 Presentation Slides for Training / Workshop on Environmental and Social 35 Safeguards, Gender Awareness, Core Labor Standards and HIV / AIDS and Human Trafficking Awareness Annex 6 Training on Livelihood Need Assessment 41 Annex 7 Workshop on Social Action Plan 44 Annex 8 Feedback Letter concerning with the EMP for the proposed quarry at 49 Sunfree Village tract, Hpa An Township, Kayin State Annex 9 Revised Project Level Grievance Redress Mechanism 51 Annex 10 Noise Monitoring Results for July to December 2018 60 Annex 11 Water Quality Monitoring Results for July to December 2018 63 Annex 12 Minutes of Public Consultation for New Quarry Site 66 Annex 13 Minutes of Consultation Meeting for New Quarry Site 74 Annex 14 Status of Concerns Raised by Affected Households in Previous ADB 77 Missions Annex 15 Bi-Monthly Environmental Monitoring Report, December 2018 80 Annex 16 Grievance Registry for December 2018 85

2 EKRIP 3RD Semi – Annual Environmental Safeguards Monitoring Report, January to June 2018

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank AQ Air Quality BEQM Baseline Environmental Quality Monitoring BOD Biological Oxygen Demand CEMP Contractor’s Environmental Management Plan CRBC China Road and Bridge Corporation CSC Construction Supervision Consultants COD Chemical Oxygen Demand dB Decibel DO Dissolved Oxygen ECC Environmental Compliance Certificate ECD Environmental Conservation Department EKRIP Eindu - Kawkareik Road Improvement Project EMP Environmental Management Plan ESMR Environmental Safeguards Monitoring Report hr Hour GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism HSE Health, Safety and Environment Officer IEE Initial Environmental Examination IES International Environment Specialist Km Kilometer LARC Land Acquisition and Resettlement Committee m Meter mg/l Milligrams per liter MOC Ministry of Construction ND Not Detected NES National Environment Specialist NOx Nitrogen Oxides PAM Project Administration Manual PEC Pyunghwa Engineering Consultants PM Particulate Matter PMU Project Management Unit REGDP Resettlement, Ethnic and Gender Development Plan REM Resource and Environment Myanmar Ltd. SEMR Semi – Annual Environmental Monitoring Report SOx Sulfur Oxides SU Standard Unit TSP Total Suspended Solids USD United States Dollar WQ Water Quality

3 EKRIP 3RD Semi – Annual Environmental Safeguards Monitoring Report, January to June 2018 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

1.0 Introduction

This report is the Fourth Semi-Annual Environmental Safeguards Monitoring Report (SEMR) for the Eindu - Kawkareik Road Improvement Project (EKRIP), covering the period from July to December 2018. The preparation and submission of the semi-annual ESMR is in compliance to the reporting requirements stipulated in the Terms of Reference for the Eindu – Kawkareik Road Improvement Project.

The report covers the two (2) sections of the EKRIP, namely:

Lot 1 – between Km 0+000 and Km 40+440 Lot 2- between Km 42+160 and Km 66+455

The report was prepared by the Construction Supervision Consultant’s (CSC) International Environmental Specialist (IES) with the assistance of the National Environment Specialist (NES). It summarizes the monthly environmental safeguards monitoring reports from January to June 2018 as submitted by the Contractor’s Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) Officer, and the recent Bi- Monthly Environmental Safeguards Monitoring Reports as submitted by the IES and NES. Reference was also made to the ADB Loan Review Mission Minutes of Meetings in July 9-13, 2018 and October 8-11, 2018.

The semi-annual report consists of the following sections:

1. Introduction, which gives an overview of the project and the source of information for the report.

2. Summary of Construction Contracts and Activities

3. Status of Compliance to Environmental Safeguards Provisions of Loan Covenants

4. Monitoring of IEE EMP Compliance, with sections on monitoring of implementation of mitigating measures and environmental quality monitoring as prescribed by the IEE EMP and Environmental Monitoring Plan.

5. Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations

6. Annexes

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

2. Construction Contracts and Activities

The status of contracts and construction activities and accomplishments of the Contractor, China Road and Bridge Corporation (CRBC) for the period January to June 2018 are as follows.

2.1 Status of Contracts

The following table summarizes the status of the project contracts (taken from the overall project semi-annual report for July to December 2018).

Table 2-1 shows that at this period, the overall progress for Lot 1 is 25.37% which has a variance of – 24.57% from the scheduled progress of 49.94%. For Lot 2, the overall progress is 19.86% which has a variance of – 24.34% from the scheduled progress or 43.90%.

Table 2-1. Status of Project Contracts

Contract No. CS1 – E-K ICB1 Lot 1 ICB1 Lot 2

Contract ICB1 ED-KKR Contract ICB1 ED-KKR Contract for Contract Name Lot1 from km 0+000 to Lot2 from km 42+160 to Consultant’s Services km 40+440 km 66+455

Pyunghwa Engineering Consultants Ltd in Joint Venture with Korea Expressway Corporation Consultant/ China Road and Bridge China Road and Bridge and in association as a Contractor Corporation Corporation sub-consultant with Construction, Research, Design and Consultancy Co- operative Limited

Commencement 10 September 2016 24 December 2016 04 January 2017 Date

Time for completion 42 months 1095 days (36 months) 1095 days (36 months)

Defects Notification N/A 365 days 365 days period

Time period Utilized 24.3 months 23.9 months

Contract Costs 5,400,794.00 USD

Invoices (Total) 1,468,346.54 USD

Payments (Total) 1,468,346.54 USD

Time remaining 723 days 734 days

Estimated progress 25.37% 19.86% Scheduled progress 49.94% 43.90%

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Variance - 24.57% - 24.34%

Accepted Contract 32,772,591,222 MMK 25,320,079,725 MMK Amount

25,484,130 USD 19,689,020 USD

IPCs (Total) USD 917,235.24 864,302.20

IPCs (Total) MMK 505,527,648 476,353,984 Payments (Total) 4,650,984.42 USD 1,839,549.14 USD USD

2.2 Mobilization

2.2.1 Contract Supervision Contractor (CSC)

The CSC services cover an anticipated three continuous years of construction supervision and a further intermittent year for support during the 1-year works defect notification periods. The Consultant services commenced on 9th September 2016. As of this reporting period, all international and national consultants have been mobilized.

The status of the Consultant's mobilization is shown in Table 2-2.

The detailed list of CSC mobilization is shown in Annex 1.

2.2.2 Contractors for Lot 1 and Lot 2

Presently, there is no separate establishment for LOT2 and there is one management team controlling both Contracts. For the period July to December 2018, the Contractor has mobilized a nominal contingent of labor force for both LOT1 and LOT2, in view of the work stoppage since the suspension of payments by ADB in May 2018.

The status of the Contractor’s mobilization is shown in Table 2-2

Table 2-2. Status of CSC and Contractor Personnel Mobilization

Number of Personnel Mobilized Description Total International National

CSC 3 7 10

Contractor 18 87 105

Total 21 94 115

The detailed lists of mobilization of Contractor Mobilization is shown in Annex 2

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

2.2.3 Equipment

The total list of equipment for both Contracts is summarized in Annex 3. The Contractor must supplement with rented/subcontract equipment.

2.3 Project Progress

2.3.1 Project Implementation Schedule

Project implementation covers a period of (3) years starting 4 July 2014 up to 31 March 2020. Project implementation Schedules was updated by ADB and Implementation Schedule is shown in Table 2-2.

Table 2-2. Project Implementation Schedule

Implementation Schedule to Date Package Plan Actual Slippage

LOT1 & LOT2 58.25% 41.04% - 17.21%

The Physical Progress of Project implementation is shown in Table 2-3. Contract LOT1 achieved a physical progress of works of 25.37% for December 2018, while Contract LOT2 achieved a physical progress of works of 19.86% for December 2018.

Table 2-3. Physical Progress of Project Implementation Schedule

Physical Progress Package Elapsed Time Plan Actual Slippage

LOT1 49.94% 25.37% - 24.57% 67.50% (21.3 Months)

LOT2 43.90% 19.86% - 24.04% 66.39% (23.9 Months)

TOTAL 47.31% 22.97% - 24.34%

2.3.2 Construction Achievements

Accomplishments in construction for the period July to December 2018 include the following:

a) Road maintenance works. b) Eindu junction concrete drainage ditch (840 m.) c) 230m concrete pavement of Eindu junction has been completed. d) Road Horizontal Alignment Drawings have been submitted and accepted by the Engineer (no change from Contract Drawings). 64.74 km Road Vertical Alignment Drawings have been submitted and 61.86 km have been accepted by

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

the Engineer. The road cross section drawings have been accepted 57.78 km by the Engineer. e) Shop drawings of bored pile for 18 bridges were submitted and approved. 15 nos detail design (including detailed design of pier, abutment and superstructure) of bridge were submitted and approved. f) Detail design of 14m&20m prestressed bridge beam were approved by the Engineer on 25th April 2018. g) 30.17 km Clearing and Grubbing work had been completed. h) 27.24 km Excavation work was completed. i) 16.77 km Backfill of embankment had been done. j) 9.3 km Improved Subgrade was filled. k) 5.43 km Subbase filling work had been completed. l) 1.23 km Aggregate Base Course had been paved. m) 0.69 km Asphalt Concrete Base Course had been paved. n) 42 nos of Culverts o) 119 nos of 14m PSC beams and 95 nos of 20 m PSC beams had been fabricated. p) 144 nos of bored pile construction had been completed.

2.3.3 Works in Progress

In view of the work stoppage as a result of the suspension of payments by ADB, only road maintenance is currently in progress. 2.3.4 Maintenance of Road

As instructed by CSC and PMU, the daily maintenance of existing road and backfilled part of the Project is ongoing.

3. Status of Compliance to Loan Agreement Environmental Safeguards Provisions

3.1 Status of Compliance to Environmental Provisions of the Loan Agreement

Since the start of the construction in 2017, the following tables show the status of the project compliance to the provisions on environmental safeguards in the Loan Agreement (Table 3- 1), the Project Administration Manual (PAM) (Table 3-2), and the Status of Contract Programs (Table 3-3).

Table 3-1 Status of Compliance to Environmental Provisions of the Loan Agreement

SI No. Item Description Compliance Status 4-6 Conditions for Award of Contract. The Borrower shall not Fully Complied award any Works contracts until: (a) The Ministry of Environmental Conservation and Forestry has granted the - Ministry of Environmental final approval of the Project; (b) the Borrower has Conservation and Forestry has incorporated the relevant provisions from the EMP into the granted the final approval of Works contracts; and (c) the Borrower has prepared and Project on 30 July 2015; 8

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

submitted to ADB the final REGDP based on the Project's - CEMP has been submitted detailed design, and obtained ADB's clearance of such by Contractor in 2017 REGDP. 5-8 Environment. The Borrower shall cause the Project Partially Complied: Executing Agency to ensure that the preparation, design, construction, implementation, and operation of the Project - The ECC for the new quarry and all Project facilities comply with (a) all applicable laws has not been submitted and regulations of the Borrower relating to environment, -All compliance to provisions health and safety; (b) the Environmental Safeguards; and (c) ongoing and being monitored. all measures and requirements set forth in the IEE, the EMP, and any corrective or preventative actions set forth in a Safeguards Monitoring Report. 5-15 Safeguards-Related Provisions in Bidding Documents and For verification Works Contracts. The Borrower shall cause the Project Executing Agency to ensure that all bidding documents and contracts for Works contain provisions that require contractors to: (a) comply with the measures relevant to the contractor set forth in the IEE, the EMP, the REGDP and the CPP (to the extent they concern impacts on affected people during construction), and any corrective or preventative actions set forth in the Safeguards Monitoring Report; (b) make available a budget for all such environmental and social measures; (c) provide the Project Executing Agency with a written notice of any unanticipated environmental, resettlement or indigenous peoples risks or impacts that arise during construction, implementation or operation of the Project that were not considered in the IEE, the EMP, and the REGDP; and (d) reinstate pathways, other local infrastructure, and agricultural land to at least their pre-Project condition upon the completion of construction. 5-16 Safeguards Monitoring and Reporting. The Borrower shall Ongoing Compliance: cause the Project Executing Agency to do the following: (c) complied late, EA approved revised procurement plan to include engagement of External monitoring consultants. Mobilization by January 2018. Ongoing Compliance: a) submit semi-annual Safeguards Monitoring Reports to - 4 Semi-annual Environmental ADB and disclose relevant information from such reports to Monitoring Reports (including affected people promptly upon submission; this one) have been submitted (b) if any unanticipated environmental and/or social risks and Ongoing Compliance: impacts arise during construction, implementation or Unanticipated environmental operation of the Project that were not considered in the IEE, and social risks and impact of the EMP, and the REGDP, promptly inform ADB of the proposed quarry have been occurrence of such risks or impacts, with detailed description identified, thus a new quarry of the event and proposed corrective action plan; has been identified. (c) for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement, no later Complied. than 3 months from the Effective Date, engage qualified and experienced external experts under a selection process and -Resettlement Specialists have terms of reference acceptable to ADB, to verify information gone through acceptable ADB produced through the Project monitoring process, and process facilitate the carrying out of any verification activities by such - RAP information verified external experts; and (d) report any actual or potential - RAP currently in breach of compliance with the measures and requirements implementation 9

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

set forth in the EMP, the REGDP and the CPP promptly after becoming aware of the breach. Ongoing Compliance: Safeguards Grievance Redress Mechanism. The Borrower - GRM launch was on 22 shall cause the Project Executing Agency to ensure that August 2017. separate safeguards grievance redress mechanisms - GRM committees (State, acceptable to ADB are established in accordance with the District, and village) set-up in 5-18 provisions of the IEE, the EMP, the REGDP and the CPP at October 2016. PMU, within the timeframes specified in the relevant IEE, - Final training was from 16 - EMP, REGDP and the CPP, to consider safeguards related 21 August 2017. complaints. - Additional training for GRM held in Dec 2018

Table 3.2. Status of Compliance to Environmental Safeguards Provisions in the Project Administration Manual

SI No. Item Description Compliance Status i. confirming that the EMP is included in the bidding Complied documents and civil works contracts ii. ensuring the CEMPs are prepared by contractors, Complied reviewed by ADB and CSC, and approved by CSC prior to construction commencing iii. establishing a system to monitor the environmental Complied aspects of the project including the indicators set out in the monitoring plan of the EMP iv. supervising the implementation of environmental Complied mitigating measures required for the construction activities v. reviewing, monitoring and evaluating the Ongoing Compliance effectiveness of the implemented CEMPs, and recommending corrective actions, if required. vi. preparing monthly environmental monitoring reports Ongoing Compliance for PMU - Monthly Environmental Monitoring Reports for July to December 2018 submitted to PMU vii. preparing the semi-annual environmental monitoring Ongoing Compliance reports for ADB review and public disclosure - 4 Semi-annual Environmental Monitoring Reports (including this one) have been submitted

viii. addressing, recording and reporting on any Ongoing Compliance grievances arising from the project’s Grievance Redress Mechanism in a timely manner ix. training MOC/ Department of Roads staff in Complied environmental safeguards and monitoring

Table 3-3 Status of Contract Programs

Seq. Version Status Package LOT1 The Revised Contractor’s Environmental In the Wrap Up Meeting of the ADB Mission on 6 Management Plan was submitted in October 11, 2018, the ADB approved the 10

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

October 2018 CEMP, except for Sub-Plan No. 05 (Quarry and Crushing Plant) which will be revised by the Contractor, to incorporate the new quarry site which will be compliant with Myanmar permit and environmental requirements, and the ADB Safeguards Policy Statement. This revised Sub- Plan No. 05 will be re-submitted for approval of PMU and ADB. Package LOT2 In the Wrap Up Meeting of the ADB Mission on October 11, 2018, the ADB approved the CEMP, except for Sub-Plan No. 05 (Quarry and The Revised Contractor’s Environmental Crushing Plant) which will be revised by the Management Plan was re-submitted in Contractor, to incorporate the new quarry site 6 October 2018 which will be compliant with Myanmar permit and environmental requirements, and the ADB Safeguards Policy Statement. This revised Sub- Plan No. 05 will be re-submitted for approval of PMU and ADB.

4.0 Monitoring of IEE EMP Compliance

4.1 Contractor’s Environmental Management Plan

The Contractor’s Environmental Management Plan has been approved during the Wrap Up Meeting of the ADB Mission on October 11, 2018, except for Sub-Plan No. 05 (Quarry and Crushing Plant) which will be revised by the Contractor, to incorporate the new quarry site which will be compliant with Myanmar permit and environmental requirements, and the ADB Safeguards Policy Statement. This revised Sub-Plan No. 05 will be re-submitted for approval of PMU and ADB.

4.2 Compliance with Mitigating Measures

The following are the highlights of the environmental compliance for July to December, 2018 (Table 4-1).

Table 4-1. Environmental Compliance with Mitigating Measures, July to December 2018

Item Activity Compliance / Accomplishment Contractor’s Preparation and As of June 2018, the Revised Contractor’s Environmental Submission of Revised Environmental Management Plan, based on this Management Plan CEMP, in accordance latest ADB comments was re-submitted. (CEMP) with ADB comments This revised CEMP was approved during the Wrap Up Meeting of the ADB Mission on October 11, 2018, excluding Sub-Plan No 5, which needs to be revised due to the new quarry site (Sunfree Village Tract) in lieu of Lun Nya Quarry. The revised CEMP (excluding Sub-Plan No 5) has been submitted to PMU and ADB in Oct 12, 2018.

CRBC has not yet submitted the revised Sub-Plan No. 5.

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Baseline Conduct Baseline  CBRC hired a Third Party, the Resource Environmental Environmental Quality Environment Myanmar (REM) Company to Quality Monitoring Monitoring (BEQM) prior conduct BEQM. to construction  BEQM was conducted in September 2017.  The Report of Findings/Results was submitted to CSC in November 2017. Monthly Submission of EMR to  Reports for July to December 2018 have been Environmental CSC submitted to CSC Monitoring Report (EMR) Tree Cutting Forest Permit issued by  Villages were notified of tree-removal schedule Forestry Department  Trees removed as reported are as follows: o July = 81 rubber trees o Aug = 85 rubber trees o Sep = 30 rubber trees o Oct = none o Nov = 70 teak and Malaysian padauk o Dec = 12 mixed species of trees  Trees were taken by Contractor and community,  Tree cutting was supervised by CRBC Dust Control Water spraying along  CRBC provided 10 water bowser trucks 24/7 alignment especially  Daily spraying of water at critical areas along areas with  Sources of water, and permit to draw water residents and businesses, and at quarry secured by CRBC sites  CRBC provided plastic sheets to households to cover and protect houses from dust  Roads were cleared of debris  Most of the months of July to Dec were rainy days so there was practically no dust observed. However, the roads were muddy, with pools of standing water where there are depressions and cavities. In some parts of the road, not all, the contractor set-up a maintenance team to fill / cover the mud pools with gravel. Noise Control At all sensitive and critical  Work has been limited to daytime only areas  Stationary equipment located away from sensitive areas  Residents were notified of work schedule  See findings of noise level measurements below.

Siltation and Provide temporary  Temporary drainage channels provided during Erosion Control drainage channels drainage works  Stockpiles located away from drainage  Drainage channels cleared of soil and debris.  In June 2018, drainage canals were constructed and the canals were cleared of soil and debris after construction.

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Water Pollution Discharge of water and  Provided settling ponds for wash water to Prevention waste transit mixers in batching plants. Settling ponds were observed to be full of solid waste debris. The Contractor already placed a roof to cover the settling ponds.  Water from dewatering operations not allowed to flow directly to water bodies  There is a drainage system at the periphery of Camp maintenance areas.  Due to work stoppage, there was little discharge of water and the settling ponds are dried up. Hazardous Management, Storage  Some hazardous materials storage areas have Materials and and disposal concrete floors and enclosed with roof cover. Waste However, there are excess hazardous materials that are stored in open areas with no concrete floors and are not properly covered.

Occupational Conduct of meetings,  Ample drinking water supplied in work sites; Health and Safety trainings, and regular  Appropriate PPEs provided to all workers; monitoring  Mobile equipment shall be fitted with backing signals  Fall prevention measures shall be provided and workers given training on working in elevated work stations;

 With the work stoppage, several laborers and staff were laid off, so the conduct of meetings and trainings were temporarily stopped, to resume when construction work re-starts when the suspension of payments is lifted.  Consultations and Conduct of trainings and a) GRM Workshop conducted for Lot1 on Nov 28 Trainings consultations 2018, and for Lot 2 on Nov 29 2018. This was organized by CSC International Resettlement Specialist (Ms. Criste Navida), with participants from PMU, LARC, GAD, Forestry, CSC and CRBC. (Documentation in Annex 4)

b) Training on Environmental and Social Safeguards, and Gender Awareness, Core Labor Standards and HIV/AIDS and Human Trafficking Awareness for project implementers (PMU/CSC and contractor) was conducted on 13 December 2018 at the CRBC Conference Room with 15 (3 female) participants. (Documentation in Annex 5)

c) Training on Livelihood Needs Assessment for project implementers (PMU and CSC) was conducted at CSC Office in Hpa An on 14 Dec 2018 with 5 (3 female) participants. (Documentation in Annex 6)

d) Workshop on Social Action Plan with the

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

project implementers (CSC and Contractor) was conducted at the CSC Office in Hpa An on 17 Dec 2018. There were 3 (1 female) participants. (Documentation in Annex 7) Asphalt Plant, New location for Asphalt The new location of the quarry is at Ka Maw Nyaw Quarry and Plant, Quarry and Region, Sun Free Village Tract, Hpa An Township, Aggregate Plant Aggregate Plant with the Kayin State. necessary environmental The owner has already applied for ECC with ECD permits from MONREC and ECD and has submitted, and subsequently revised the EMP, to ECD (letter of submission to ECD including comments of ECD is in Annex 8). Traffic Traffic safety and  Traffic management measures in place, i.e. Management Plan management scheme traffic warning signs , barriers , tape barriers enforcement  Temporary diversion road provided  Traffic control personnel assigned at work site  Barriers installed around excavations and illumination provided Camp Site At Km 14 and Km 37  Provision of firefighting equipment, sufficient sites water, wastewater treatment facility, first aid kits, fencing and security  Camp rules and regulations enforced  Waste management in place; waste bins installed. The local government collects garbage once a week.  Drainage installed and kept clean and unobstructed  Sanitary conditions in kitchen and toilets maintained

Solid Waste At Camp sites and  Waste bins in camps and labor camps Management construction sites provided, and disposal site identified, However, burning of waste and littering of waste continues.  The local government collects the garbage at the campsites once a week.  Temporary waste storage provided in camp site  Waste segregation observed only in CRBC office  Above ground fuel tank with impervious flooring, containment wall and sump Grievance Redress To act on complaints and  The Project Level GRM was revised in Mechanism grievances of affected November 2018 (Annex 9). communities  A Workshop was conducted by CSC, PMU and LARC on 28th and 29th November 2018 at CSC Office in Hpa An and in Kawkareik respectively. Noise monitoring At sensitive monitoring  For July, noise levels exceed standards (55 dB Results stations A) at 10 sampling stations (except AAQ04 and AAQ14), with highest at Station AAQ15 (67 dB(A)  For August, noise levels exceed standards (55 dB A) at 6 sampling stations (except AAQ05, AAQ06, AAQ07, AAQ09 and AAQ14), with

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

highest at Station AAQ15 (65 dB(A).  For September, noise levels exceed standards (55 dB A) at 6 sampling stations (except AAQ04, AAQ06, AAQ08, AAQ11, AAQ13 and AAQ14), with highest at Stations AAQ01 (58dB(A), AAQ07 (57 dB(A), and AAQ10 (58dB(a).  For Oct 2018, noise levels exceed standards (55 dB A) at Station AAQ05 (57 dB A), Station AAQ008 (58 dB A), Sation AAQ07 (56 dB(A), Station AAQ10 (57dB A) and Station AAQ15 (60 dB A).  For Nov 2018, noise levels exceed standards (55 dB A) at 7 sampling stations (except AAQ03, AAQ08, AAQ10, amd AAQ14), with highest at Station AAQ01 (65 dB(A)) and AAQ04 (67 dB(A)).  For Dec 2018, noise levels exceed standards (55 dB A) at Station AAQ11 with recorded noise level of 56 dB(A), and AAQ15 with recorded noise level of 67 dB(A) Monthly Noise Monitoring results for July to December 2018 are in Annex 10 Water quality At selected monitoring  For all the 9 sampling stations, all 5 monitoring stations parameters tested (temperature, pH, DO, conductivity and visual plumes) have been found within standards.

Monthly Water Quality Monitoring results for July to December 2018 are in Annex 11

Public Conduct of Public  A public consultation for the Sanfree Quarry Consultations / Consultations was held on Oct 12 2018 at the Sun Free Notifications Village with 30 participants from CRBC, CSC, PMU, Quarry Owner, village monks and the villagers. Documents of public consultation in Annex 12.  Another consultation meeting was held on Nov 4 2018 at the Sun Free Village Quarry Site with participants from CSC, PMU, Quarry Owner, and village monks. Minutes and photos of meeting are in Annex 13.

4.3 Environmental Quality Monitoring

The specifications for EQM are enumerated in Table 4-2. This specification is also included in the CEMP.

Table 4-2. Specifications for environmental quality monitoring

Parameters Frequency Location Method Responsibility Air  PM10  Once prior to At 10 Air Quality To be carried and  SOX construction monitoring Internationally out by Noise  NOX stations (see accepted accredited 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

 CO  Monthly CEMP) sampling and licensed  Noise (dB(A) during in Lot 1 and analytical environmental construction Lot 2 methods, e.g. service provider USEPA. and laboratory; Water  Temperature  Once prior to At 12 Water Quality Quality  pH construction monitoring Internationally  Total Suspended stations (see accepted  Solids (TSS)  Monthly CEMP) in Lot sampling and  BOD during 1 and Lot 2 analytical  DO construction methods, e.g.  Total and Fecal USEPA Coliform

The locations of the monitoring stations for air and water quality are shown in Map 4-1.

For Air Quality, there are 10 monitoring stations as shown in Table 4-3, and for Water Quality, there are 9 monitoring stations as shown in Table 4-4.

Table 4-3 Sampling Points for Air Quality Monitoring and their Location

Sampling Coordinate Description of Sampling Point Points AAQ 01 (N-1) 16° 46’ 15.50” N, 97° 45’ 6.30” E Located in the BARMAN Eindu Mon monastery compound, Eindu Village, Hpa An Township AAQ 04 (N-2) 16° 44’ 47.36” N, 97° 48’ 17.22” Located in the Khaneindo B.E.M.S compound, E Khaneindo Village, Hpa An Township AAQ 05 (N-3) 16° 43’ 44.53” N, 97° 49’ 20.95” Located in the high school compound, Kawkada E Village, Hpa An Township AAQ 06 (N-4) 16° 43’ 34.53” N, 97° 53’ 29.84” Located in the high school compound, Weal Kayin E Village, Hpa An Township AAQ 07(N-5) 16° 37’ 19.61” N, 97° 57’ 13.46” Located in the primary school compound, E Thadaoo Village, Hpa An Township AAQ 08 (N-6) 16° 36’ 33.27” N, 97° 59’ 40.95” Located in the high school compound, Gyaing E Village, Hpa An Township AAQ 09 (N-7) 16° 35’ 42.84” N, 98° 2’ 25.69” E Located in the hospital compound, Kyondoe Town, Kawkareik Township AAQ 10 (N-8) 16° 35’ 34.31” N, 98° 2’ 22.15” E Located in the Sutaungpyae Aye Zaydi (Pagoda) compound, Kyondoe Town, Kawkareik Township AAQ 11 (N-9) 16° 34’ 1.91” N, 98° 6’ 42.98” E Located in the middle school compound, Ngar Taing Village, Kawkareik Township AAQ 13 (N-2) 16° 33’ 0.04” N, 98° 11’ 11.81” E Located in the middle school compound, Hlaing Wa Village, Kawkareik Township

Table 4-4 Sampling Points for Water Quality Monitoring and their Locations

No Station Type Coordinate Description of Sampling Point . 1 WQ-1 Surface 16° 46’ 15.50” N, At stream near Kha Nal Do Village, Hpa An Township Water 97° 45’ 6.30” E 2 WQ-2 Surface 16° 44’ 47.36” N, At stream near Thsr Yar Kan Village, Hpa An Township Water 97° 48’ 17.22” E 3 WQ-3 Surface 16° 43’ 44.53” N, At stream near Well Gyi Village, Hpa An Township Water 97° 49’ 20.95” E 16

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

4 WQ-4 Surface 16° 43’ 34.53” N, At stream near Tar Do Village, Hpa An Township Water 97° 53’ 29.84” E 5 WQ-5 Surface 16° 37’ 19.61” N, At Hlaing Bwe River Water 97° 57’ 13.46” E 6 WQ-6 Surface 16° 36’ 33.27” N, At stream near Kyondoe Village, Kawkareik Township Water 97° 59’ 40.95” E 7 WQ-7 Surface 16° 35’ 42.84” N, At stream near Nwar Chan Gon Village, Kawkareik Water 98° 2’ 25.69” E Township 8 WQ-8 Surface 16° 35’ 34.31” N, At stream near Kha Nal Do Village, Kawkareik Township Water 98° 2’ 22.15” E 9 WQ-9 Surface 16° 34’ 1.91” N, At stream near Hlaing Wa Village, Kawkareik Township Water 98° 6’ 42.98” E

Map 4-1 Locations of Air Quality (AAQ) and Water Quality (WQ) Monitoring Stations

4.3.1 Air Quality Monitoring

4..3.1.1 Air Quality Monitoring Results

The Contractor did not conduct air quality monitoring of the designated sampling stations for the period July to December 2018.

4.3.1.2 Noise Monitoring Results

The locations of air and noise monitoring stations are the same. The results of the noise level monitoring are shown in Table 4-6. No noise monitoring was conducted in December 2018. 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

1. 2 Noise The standard Noise Levels from the Myanmar Environmental Quality Guidelines are in Table Su4r-v5e.y Item

Myanmar government issued noise level standard in National Environmental Quality (Emission) Full results of Noise Monitoring from July to December are in Annex 10 G uidelines (2005) and thus the survey result was evaluated by comparing with this standard. Table 4-5 Noise Levels from Myanmar Environmental Quality Guidelines Table 1.2-1 (a) Ambient N oise Standard of Myanmar Items Day time (Leq) Night time (Leq)

Residential; institutional, 55 dB (7am – 10pm, 15hrs) 45 dB (10pm – 7am, 9hrs) Myanmar educational standard Industrial; commercial 70 dB (7am – 10pm, 15hrs) 70 dB (10pm – 7am, 9hrs)

Table 1.2-1 (b) Ambien t Noise Standard of IFC Table 4-6 Noise Measurements from July to December 2018

DistanceIFC fromR sourceesidential; = 100m institu tional, educational 55 dB (7am – 10pm, 45 dB (10pm – 7am, Time of measurement = Morning 7 AM to 11:30 AM 15hrs) 9hrs) Industrial; commercial 70 dB (7am – 10pm, 70 dB (10pm – 7am, Sta No Km Location Baseline Myanmar 15hrs) Noise Level 9hrs) Chainage dB(A) Standard dB(A) Leq dBA Daytime July Aug Sept. Oct Nov Dec Summary of sampling points 1 AAQ01 Km 0+00 Start at 57 Residential 57 55 58 54 65 - The locations and survey peEinduriod of air and noise q55u ality monitoring point are the same. Commercial Survey Method 70 2 AAQ04 Km6+680 Khaneindo 58 Residential 55 56 53 55 67 - Sampling and monitoring Middleof su rrounding sound 55w ere conducted by using following instrument for 24 hours/1 day measurementSchool. Commercial 70 3 AAQ05Instru menKm9+690t Katakana Brand57 Residential M57od el 54 56 Measu57re ment 53un it - High 55 Sound Level Meter School Lutron Commercial SL-4023SD dB 70

4 AAQ06 Km18+420 Thayagone 58 Residential 60 55 55 55 56 - Survey Result Primary 55 School Commercial Noise levels (LAeq) of the monitoring points were70 p resented in table 1.2-2 and 1.2-3 and figure 1.2-1 to

1.25 -10AAQ07. One dKm34+900ayLAeq w as cThadaoalcula ted by 55us ing thResidentiale follow ing a59rr ay for52m ula in 58th e exce56l s heet.57 T his form- ula Village 55 is firstly used for hourly LAeq and then for the 24 hours LAeq. School Commercial 10*LOG10(AVERGAE(10^((RANGE)/10))) 70 58 56 55 58 53 By6 meAAQ08ans o f tKm39+530he calcu lateGyaingd res ults, m59o st of dResidentialay time and night time niose levels are higher than- the High 55 applied standard categorizSchooled a s “Residential;Commercial instituti o nal, educational”, except N-10. As most of the monitoring locations are located beside Eindu-Kaw70k ariek Road with heavy traffic even during night time, tra7 fficAAQ09 noise isKm44+800 mainly inflKyondoeuent t he noi59se leveResidentiall. More over56, u nusua55l noise 57fro m so54m e acti56vit ies suc- h as Hospital 55 26 | Pag e Commercial 18

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

70 8 AAQ10 Kyondoe Pagoda 55 Residential 57 59 58 57 55 - Port near 55 Access Kyondoe Commercial River Port 70 9 AAQ11 Km53+570 Ngar Tin 59 Residential 58 60 55 55 57 - Middle 55 School Commercial 70 1 AAQ13 Km62+740 Kawkareik 55 Residential 58 56 53 56 56 - 0 Middle 55 School Commercial 70 1 AAQ14 KM 37 Batching 51 Residential 53 51 53 52 54 - 1 Plant 55 Commercial 70 1 AAQ15 Km 5+ Aggregate 65 Residential 67 65 57 60 58 - 2 Plant 55 Commercial 70

 For AAQ01, the noise levels exceed the standard in July, Sep and Nov 2018.  For AAQ04, noise levels exceeded the standard in August and Nov 2018.  For AAQ05, noise level exceeded the standard in July, Sep and Oct 2018.  For AAQ06, noise levels exceeded the standard in July and Nov 2018.  For AAQ07, exceeded the standard in July, Sep, Oct and Nov 2018.  For AAQ08, the noise levels exceeded the standard in July, Aug and Oct 2018.  For AAQ09, the noise levels exceeded the standard in July, Sep and Nov 2018.  For AAQ10, the noise levels from July to Oct were exceeded than the standard.  For AAQ11 the noise levels exceeded the standard in July, Aug and Nov 2018.  For AAQ13, the noise levels exceeded the standard in July, Aug, Oct and Nov 2018.  For AAQ14, there was no month (July-Dec 2018) of the noise level higher than the standard.  For AAQ15, the noise levels from July to Nov exceeded the standard.

As most of the monitoring locations are located beside Eindu-Kawkariek Road with heavy traffic even during night time, it is traffic noise that mainly influences the noise level. It should also be noted that for the period July to December, only road maintenance activities were carried out by the Contractor. Moreover, unusual noise from some activities, dogs barking, people loudly speaking near monitoring stations cause the high noise level during monitoring.

4.3.2 Water Quality Monitoring Results

For water quality monitoring, the results are shown in Table 4-7. The Water Quality Standards for Road Projects from the Myanmar Environmental Quality Guidelines is shown in Table 4-8. No water quality monitoring was done for December 2018.

Full results of Water Quality Monitoring are in Annex 11.

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Table 4-7 Water Quality Measurements from July to December 2018

Station Km July August September October November December No Chainage Te pH DO Te pH DO Te pH DO Te pH DO Te pH DO Te pH DO mp mg mp mg mp mg mp mg mp mg mp mg oC oC oC oC oC oC

1 WQ01 Km 6+820 25 5. 7. 25 5. 7. 26 6. 6. 26 7. 6. 24 6. 4. .9 69 24 .5 75 51 .5 85 56 .6 75 56 .6 63 25 2 WQ02 Km19+400 25 7. 7. 25 7. 7. 25 7. 7. 25 7. 7. 25 5. 4. .6 98 39 .9 75 68 .9 15 28 .7 5 28 .4 5. 20 88 3 WQ03 Km25+290 26 6. 7. 25 7. 7. 26 5. 5. 26 6. 5. N/ N/ N/ .2 41 01 .5 25 45 .7 55 45 20 45 A A A 4 WQ04 Km34+710 26 7. 6. 26 7. 6. 26 7. 6. 26 7. 6. N/ N/ N/ .8 20 65 .2 45 83 .8 82 26 .3 10 26 A A A 5 WQ05 Km42+160 25 7. 5. 26 7. 6. 27 7. 5. 27 7. 5. 25 7. 5. .7 33 75 .7 35 75 .2 85 56 .2 85 65 .7 64 65 6 WQ06 Km43+920 26 6. 5. 26 6. 6. 26 6. 6. 25 6. 6. 26 7. 4. .2 25 15 .8 48 45 .5 55 39 .7 32 39 .2 91 65 7 WQ07 Km47+800 26 6. 4. 26 7. 6. 27 7. 5. 27 7. 5. N/ N/ N/ .8 95 95 .5 95 10 .2 22 65 .2 35 65 A A A 8 WQ08 Km55+410 25 7. 5. 26 7. 6. 27 7. 6. 27 7. 6. N/ N/ N/ .9 10 90 .9 85 28 .8 55 18 .8 65 18 A A A 9 WQ09 Hlaing 25 7. 5. 26 7. 5. 26 7. 6. 26 7. 6. 25 7. 6. Bridge .6 5 95 .6 50 95 .9 20 25 .9 40 25 .3 36 85

Evaluating the results in comparison with the standards (Table 7), it is shown that for pH, while all monitoring stations are within the pH range of 6-9, Stations WQ01, WQ02 and WQ03 showed results below 6 which indicates acidity in the water quality.

Unfortunately, the other parameters measured are not included in the parameters in the standards of Myanmar.

Table 4-8 Water Quality Guidelines for Road Projects from Myanmar Environmental Quality Guidelines

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

5.0 Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations

5.1 Summary and Conclusions

a) Monitoring of EMP implementation showed that the project has generally complied with all the mitigating measures.

b) There is still the pending approval of the ECC of the new quarry site located at Ka Maw Nyaw Region, Sun Free Village Tract, Hpa An Township, Kayin State. The quarry owner has already submitted the required Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to the Regional ECD as part of its application for ECC (see Annex 8).

c) Public Consultations have been conducted for the new quarry sites, and in general, the stakeholders have no objection and agreed to support to the quarry. The owner agreed to the requests of the villagers and the monks for the provision of access road and electricity. The quarry owner also agreed to provide CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) Programs for the village and the monks.

d) Other minor issues such regarding housekeeping measures of the Construction Camps, Workers Camps remain.

e) Three grievances have been registered in December 2018, the report is included in Annex 16.

f) For environmental quality, there were concerns fugitive dust, however, the rainy season has alleviated the prevalence of dust in the construction areas, and there was not much need for watering the construction sites. However, the rains brought floods which caused the roads to have potholes that needed to be filled with gravel, to avoid bumpy roads during travel.

g) With regard to water quality, the pH levels were within the pH range of 6-9. However, there is concern that other parameters were measured instead of those which are required in the IEE, such as e-coli and oil and grease.

h) The ADB October 2018 Mission raised EMP compliance issues. The actions taken by the Contractor to address the issues are presented in Annex 14.

i) The suspension by ADB of disbursements from the loan due to non-compliance of ADB environmental safeguards policy, continued throughout June to December 2018. This has continued the slowing down of construction activities (confined mainly to road maintenance activities, especially during the rainy season.

j) The next 6 months from January to June 2019 should see the resumption of full construction activities with the issuance of the ECC for the new quarry site, and lifting of ADB’s suspension of payments to Contractors.

5.2 Ranking of Overall Progress of Implementing Environmental Safeguards

Rating parameters Rating (1-10)*

I. Compliance to Loan Covenants 5 21

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

II. Compliance to Mitigating Measures 5 III. Submission of requirements (Reports, etc.) a. CEMP 5 b. Environmental Permits 0 c. Monthly reports 7.5 IV. Timely submission / compliance 5 Overall (Average of total of I – IV) 27.5/6= 4.58 say 5 (Fair)

*Rating equivalents: Very Good = 10; Good = 7.5; Fair = 5; Poor = 3; Very Poor = 1.5

5.3 Recommendations

For the following months (January to June 2019), the following recommendations are hereby made:

a) CRBC should continue to follow up with ECD on the issuance of the ECC for the new quarry site.

b) CRBC should maintain the watering of roads to alleviate the dust problem affecting communities and commercial establishments along the road.

c) The Contractor’s campsites should be kept clean of all litter and garbage, and workers should avoid burning of wastes.

d) While ADB has recommended the conduct or another baseline survey, it is recommended that this be conducted a few months after the resumption of construction activities in order to get more significant and comparative results.

e) In order for the Contractor, PMU and CSC to appreciate the technical aspects of environmental monitoring, and also the build capacity of PMU, a technical training on environmental monitoring should be conducted once the construction resumes.

Submitted by:

CELESTINO ULEP International Environment Specialist

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 1

Status of the Consultant's Mobilization (July to December 2018)

Mobilization Ref. Position Name Start End International Key Staff Richard Joseph CAMISE 10 Sep 16 8 April 17 Project Manager/ Contract Peter Dinan 23 Jun 17 31 Oct 17 KI-01 Management Chang Dal KIM 2 Dec 17 8 July 18 specialist Kyuho Yoon 9 July 18 Vimal Ranjith DALUWATTE 9 Sep 16 9 Dec 16 Senior Resident KI-02 Mohan Krishnan 1 Mar 17 2 Aug 17 Engineer Yong Bin CHO 25 Aug 17 27 Oct 16 17 Dec 16 Senior Bridge KI-03 Hee Chul KANG 13 Feb 17 30 Mar 17 Engineer 25 Oct 17 24 Nov 17 27 Oct 16 10 Jan 17 Senior Material H.D.G SARATHCHANDRA KI-04 1 Feb 17 15 May 17 Engineer Jose B. TEODORO 2 May 18 6 Jun 18

Senior Pavement KI-05 Han Jun AHN 5 Nov 17 4 Dec 17 Engineer 26 Dec 16 10 Feb 17 Senior Mohammad Isa ANSARI KI-06 Resettlement 7 Sep 17 21 Oct 17 Specialist Criste Zuniga-Navida 28 Oct 18 18 April 17 20 May 17 Emmanuel S. BATE 13 Aug 17 6 Sep 17 Senior Environment 17 Jan 18 31 Jan 18 KI-07 Specialist 1 Mar 18 15 Mar 18 Celestino ULEP 24 Jun 18 14 July 18 3 Oct 2018 13 Oct 2018 Senior Monitoring 19 Nov 17 25 Nov 17 KI-08 and Evaluation Se Yoon OH 17 Dec 17 23 Dec 17 Specialist 22 Apr 18 28 Apr 18 Maria Lyra Songco ESTARIS Senior Social 4 Jan 18 17 Feb 18 KI-09 Development 3 Mar 18 17 Mar 18 Ester Felix Specialist 20 May 18 02 Jun 18 23 Jun 18 01 Jul 18 National Key Staff U Soe Tint 12 Sep 16 30 Nov 16 Deputy Project KN-01 1 Feb 17 22 Feb 17 Manager U Tha Kyaw Zan 2 Jun17 Resident U Htun Lwin 1 Jan 17 30 Sep 17 KN-02 Engineer(1) U Tint Lwin Soe 1 Dec 17 1 Aug 18

Resident U Thein Tun 1 Nov 16 30 Nov 16 KN-03 Engineer(2) 23

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

U Thaung Hlaing 1 Nov 16 30 Nov 16 KN-04 Bridge Engineer U Aung Myint 13 Feb 17 30 Sep 18

Material U Tun Aung Kyaw 1 Nov 16 30 Nov 16 KN-05 Engineer(1) U Aung Maung 1 Feb 17 1 Aug 18 Material KN-06 U Hla Kyi 1 Mar 17 30 Sep 17 Engineer(2) KN-07 Surveyor U Tin Maung Thin Daw Nyunt Nyunt Tin 1 Mar 17 31 Jul 17 KN-08 QS Engineer Daw Myat Hnin Khine 19 Oct 17 U Khin Maung Latt 1 Nov 16 30 Nov 16 Resettlement/Social KN-09 U Than Naing Oo 1 Oct 17 31 Jul 18 Development Specialist U Phyo Myint Oo 2 Oct 18 U Soe Myint 1 Nov 16 30 Nov 16

Environmental U Thapye Myo Oo 12 Jan 18 31 Jul 18 KN-10 Specialist U Naing Win 2 Oct 18 16 Nov 18 U Myo Min Kyaw 13 Dec 18 Benefit Monitoring KN-11 U Win Myint Specialist KN-12 Finance Specialist Daw Ohn Kyin National Non Key Staff Site Engineer/ NN-01 U Tin Win 1 Mar 17 1 Aug 18 Inspector(1) Site Engineer/ NN-02 U Yan Paing Soe 1 Mar 17 1 Aug 18 Inspector(2) Site Engineer/ NN-03 U Swan Thura Zaw 19 Apr 17 1 Aug 18 Inspector(3) Site Engineer/ U Than Tun 1 Aug 18 NN-04 Inspector(4) U Zin Linn Htet 25 April 18 1 Aug 18

Site Engineer/ Daw Khant Khant Zin Mon NN-05 Inspector(5) U Kaung Zaw 3 Jun 18 Site Engineer/ NN-06 U Nay Myo Thu 1 Mar 17 Inspector(6) Site Engineer/ NN-07 U Zaw Win 1 Mar 17 Inspector(7) Site Engineer/ NN-08 Daw Aye Chan Myint Kyi Inspector(8) Site Engineer/ NN-09 U Phyo Wai Zin 19 Apr 17 1 Aug 18 Inspector(9) Site Engineer/ NN-10 U Kyaw Nyein Chan Oo 1 May 17 1 Aug 18 Inspector(10) Laboratory NN-11 Daw Wah Wah Htike 1 May 17 1 Aug 18 Technician(1) Laboratory NN-12 Daw Htet Htet Hnin 1 May 17 1 Aug 18 Technician(2) Laboratory NN-13 Daw Yu Zana 1 May 17 1 Aug 18 Technician(3) NN-14 Laboratory Daw Kay Thi Soe 24

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Technician(4) Daw Aye Thida 5 Mar 18 1 Aug 18 Support Staff 1 Office Administrator U Win Min 1 Sep 17 Bilingual 1 Sep 17 1 Aug 18 2 Daw Nan Su Yee Win Secretary(1) 1 Nov 18 Bilingual 3 Daw Nan Sagawar 1 Sep 17 1 Aug 18 Secretary(2) Bilingual 4 Daw Naw Phyo Phyo Khine 8 Nov 17 1 Aug 18 Secretary(3)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 2

Status of the Contractor’s Mobilization (July to December 2018)

Lot 1: Km 0+000 to Km 40+440

Minimum No. Position Name Status Requirement

1 Project Manager (LOT1&2) 1 Zhang Sheqi Not sighted in Project

Deputy Project Manager Wang Yao long 1 On site (LOT1&2) (Ron)

2 Construction Manager 1 Lv Hongliang On site

3 Senior Highway Engineer 1 Fan Pengfei On site

Fan Sheng tong 4 Senior Bridge Engineer 1 On site (Fred)

5 Geotechnical Engineer (LOT1&2) 1 U.N.O From subcontractor

Yang Wen hui 6 Quality Control Engineer 1 Based in Laboratory (Materials)

7 Plant and Equipment Engineer 1 Li Yuliang (Lee) On site

8 Quantity Surveyor (LOT1&2) 1 Bu Yunhua (Bruce) On site

9 Assistant Quantity Surveyor 1 Yang Chuan On site

10 Setting out Engineer 1 Deng Lei (Ladeng) On site

Environment, Health & Safety On site. Working in 11 1 Ju Jian Bo Specialist camp only

No. Description Schedule Actual Remark

1 Professional Not yet submitted 13 10 in LOT2

2 Technician Not yet submitted 20 17 in LOT2

3 Skilled Worker Not yet submitted 21 20 in LOT2

4 Unskilled Worker Not yet submitted 92 80 in LOT2

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Lot 2: Km 42+160 and km 66+455

Minimum No. Position Name Status Requirement

1 Project Manager (LOT1&2) 1 Zhang Sheqi Never in Project

Deputy Project Manager Wang Yao long 1 On site (LOT1&2) (Ron)

2 Construction Manager 1 Meng Zhao On site

3 Senior Highway Engineer 1 Wang Meng On site

4 Senior Bridge Engineer 1 Cui Zhaofu

5 Geotechnical Engineer 1 U.N.O

Replacement Laboratory 6 Quality Control Engineer 1 manager is not accepted

7 Plant and Equipment Engineer 1 Wu Xin On site

Bu Yunhua 8 Quantity Surveyor (LOT1&2) 1 On site (Bruce)

9 Assistant Quantity Surveyor 1 Li Fangmi On site

10 Setting out Engineer 1 Li Xiaoping On site

Environment, Health & Safety 11 1 Phae Phyo Win On site Specialist

No. Description Schedule Actual Status

1 Professional Not yet submitted 10 13 in LOT1

2 Technician Not yet submitted 17 20 in LOT1

3 Skilled Worker Not yet submitted 20 21 in LOT1

4 Unskilled Worker & subcontractors Not yet submitted 80 92 in LOT1

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 3

Status of the Contractor’s Equipment (July to December 2018)

Contract Mobilization Status No. Equipment Description Minimal Mobilized to Planned Requirement Site (yet to be for LOT1&2 shipped) 1 Bulldozer ≥ 110 CV As required 2 2 Excavator ≥ 0.8 m3 As required 2 3 Excavator 20t As required 12 4 Concrete batching plant ≥60 m3/h 1 2 5 Hot mixing asphalt plant ≥120 ton/h 1 1 6 ABC mixing plant 1 7 Asphalt Paver Finisher ≥ 300T/h 1 1 8 Steel tired smooth roller ≥ 10 ton 2 5 9 Motor grader ≥ 110CV 4 4 10 Rubber tyred (pneumatic) roller ≥ 10 ton 6 2 11 Concrete mix truck ≥ 6 m3 As required 8 12 Vibrating roller 12-16 ton 4 4 13 Dump truck ≥ 12 ton As required 28 14 Road sprinkler ≥ 5m3 7 Being 15 Pre-stressing jack ≥ 290 ton acquired 16 Crane & Crane truck ≥ 20 ton 2 4 17 Beam truck (Trailer) 1 2 18 Generator (standby) ≥ 200KVA 1 5 19 Wheel Loader As required 5 20 Fixed crusher plant 1 1 21 Road Power Broom 2 22 Asphalt Tandem rollers 4 23 Padfoot vibrating roller 4 24 Backhoe Loader 2 25 Gantry Frame 2 26 Tower Light 6 27 Forklift 1 28 Asphalt Distributor Truck 1 29 Fuel Truck 2 30 Generator 9 31 Breaking Hammer 6 32 Jackhammer 6 33 DTH Drill 1 34 Weighbridge 2

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Contract Mobilization Status No. Equipment Description Minimal Mobilized to Planned Requirement Site (yet to be for LOT1&2 shipped) 35 Asphalt Melting Machine 1 36 Tractor-Truck 2 37 Low Bed Trailer 1 38 Contactless Balance Beam 1 39 Cement Stabilized Paver 1 40 Portable Compressor 2 Total 142

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 4

One-Day Workshop for REGDP Workshop Report Background/Rationale - Recent developments in the implementation of the REGDP for EKRIP - Need for the PMU, LARC to keep abreast with the requirements of REGDP - Need for the PMU, LARC, CSC, Contractor to have additional knowledge on the social safeguards - Need for the PMU, CSC, Contractor to define roles and responsibility Brief Description of the Activity The Workshop was a one-day activity that focused on REGDP Process during project implementation, Grievance Mechanism, Responsibility Charting using the Responsibility, Accountability, Communication and Information (RACI) Matrix, Communication strategies, Reporting Requirements Objectives 1. To increase the level of awareness on the safeguards requirements of the project REQDP, Grievance Mechanism, Communication Strategies and Reporting requirements; 2. To clarify roles and responsibilities using the RACI Matrix 3. To harmonize and draft procedure on gray areas in resettlement such as DMS, vulnerable group, temporary works, Livelihood Program for AHHs 4. To establish GRM Committees at project level; and 5. To deepen participant’s appreciation of their crucial role for the successful implementation of EKRIP. Participants Day 1- November 28 at Hpa-An , CSC Office, Male 15 ; Female 2; Total Participant 17, refer to the attendance sheet and photo Day 2 – November 29 at Kawkareik, CSC Office, Male 11 ; Female 2; Total Participant 13, refer to the attendance sheet and photo Outputs Achieved 1. The participants were clarified on the roles and responsibilities of various players of the REGDP and the project implementation; 2. The participants suggested some modifications on draft Grievance Redress Mechanism. 3. Feedbacks for the participants are the following: 1) having roles and responsibilities are defined to each player of REGDP and project implementation, it is now clearer on what to be expected from each person, unit or agency; 2) This workshop should have been conducted when the project has just started, nonetheless, it is still useful as it clarifies everyone’s roles. The REGDP and GRM process, were clearly explained to the best knowledge of the participants. 4. Request for a template for the Notification for the Absentee and Unknown owners.

Questions and Answers Question Answer On the validity period of Notices for the Township LARC committee member suggested a one (1) Category 2 (Absentee AHHs) and Category 4 month or 30 calendar days for the Notice Validity for (Unknown AHHs). Category 2 (Absentee AHHs) and two (2) months or sixty (60) calendar days for Notice Validity instead of 3 months for Category 4 (Unknown AHHs) (Day 1 , Hpa- An Side). On the method of reaching out to the absentee The Department of Land Record Officer suggested to and unknown owners such as posting of include contact details of the Village Chiefs for Cat-2 notices in local and national newspapers. (Absentee AHHs) and Cat 4 (Unknown AHHs) (Day 1 , Hpa- An Side). On the time frame to resolve complains at Township LARC committee member agreed to the Level 1- Village Level GRC, and Level 2- suggested timeframe of two (2) days to documents Project Level GRC . complains at Level 1- Village Level GRM, and seven (7) days (Min) to resolve complaints at Level 2-Project Level 30

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

GRM (Day 1 , Hpa- An Side). On the role of NGO/CSO in Level 2- the Township LARC committee member agreed that the project level and Level 3- District/ state level NGO/CSO be involved in GRC Levels 2 and 3, however, GRC and their accreditation. they should be accredited. (Day 1 , Hpa- An Side) Kawkareik Township LARC members Kawkareik Township LARC committee member agreed recommendation for Category 2 (Absentee with Hpa-An Township LARC committee member on the AHHs) and Category 4 (Unknown AHHs) Notification period of one (1) month or 30 calendar days for Category 2 (Absentee AHHs) and two (2) months or sixty (60) calendar instead of 3 months for Category 4 (Unknown AHHs) (Day 2 , Kawkareik Side). U Win Ko (Representative from PMU) There were reservations to the involvement of the CSO/NGO in the GRM. Nonetheless, the participants hope that their involvement will result to a positive cooperation. Should the NGO/CSO be paid, if they will be involved in the GRM? Dr. Criste Z. Navida responded that a representative NGO/CSO is usually invited to participate in the GRM process is based on the principle of transparency. However, only accredited NGO/CSO with a government agency concerned such as the Ministry of Construction shall be invited. (Day-2) U Min Htet Aung (Representative from In Kayin State, a lot of registered NGO/CSO, so call the PMU) meeting first and ask them please select your representative person within your network or group. And then, we need to wait ADB comments for our project level GRM. (Day-2) Daw Moe Pwint Phyu (PMU) After the approval of the GRM by ADB, the PMU has to present this mechanism to the district and state level LARC members, for their recommendations and suggestions to our project level GRM.

Feedback for the Participants Person Feedback Mr. Kyuho Yoon (Team Leader, CSC Team) This workshop is very useful for us (PMU,CSC, CRBC and LARC members). Mr. Tha Kyaw Zan (Deputy Team Because of this workshop and RACI Matrix, we now Leader,CSC Team), Day-1 know very specific and detailed knowledge on resettlement more than before. Mr. Tha Kyaw Zan (Deputy Team I believe that everybody very well know about Leader,CSC Team), Day-2 resettlement, GRM and RACI Matrix after the workshop Mr. YB Cho ( Sr. Resident Engineer, CSC I believe that it is very useful and effective for multi Team) stakeholders EKRIP. Mr. Wang (CRBC Co.,Ltd) Due to this workshop, we know exactly what CRBC Responsibility. Mr. Bruce (CRBC Co.,Ltd) After the Presentation and RACI Matrix exercise, we know that teamwork is important by knowing exactly each responsibility. Mr. Pyae Phyo (CRBC Co.,Ltd), Day-1 Very pleasure for attending this workshop. Mr. Pyae Phyo (CRBC Co.,Ltd), Day-2 CRBC Co.,Ltd know every detail of each party responsibility so its help moving forward the project. Daw Moe Pwint Phyu (PMU/MoC), Day-1 On behalf of PMU, this is very useful workshop and good to PMU/MoC, CSC, CRBC and LARC members. Daw Moe Pwint Phyu (PMU/MoC), Day-2 Same as above 31

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Representative of Department of Land We know the very useful knowledge on resettlement. Record ( Hpa-An Township), Day-1 Thank you so much. Representative of Department of Forestry Thank you so much for good workshop and our (Hpa-An Township), Day-1 department will be supporting for project successful. Representatvie of Hpa- An District MoC, Thank you so much for great explanation and sharing Day-1 knowledge. Representative of Hpa-An GAD, Day-1 - Representative of Department of Land Thank you so much for good workshop and our Record ( Kawkareik Township), Day-2 department will be supporting for project successful. Representative of Department of Forestry Thank you so much for good workshop and our (Kawkareik Township), Day-2 department will be supporting for project successful Representatvie of Kawkareik Township MoC, Congratulation for our department because our Day-2 department have a lot accountability and responsibility. Thanks to all! Representative of Kawkareik GAD, Day-2 Thank you so much for good workshop and our department will be supporting for project successful. Representative from PMU, Day-2 U Win KO(PMU) : Thank you so much for presentation and RACI exercise

Photos

Group Photo of Hpa-An Particpants (Day-1) Participants in the training room (Day-1)

RACI matix exercise (Day-1) Awarding of Certificate to the PMU Officer (Day-1)

Dr. Criste Z. Navida as presenter (Day-1) Group Discussion (Day-1)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

CSC Team Leader giving a speech (Day-1) Participants giving feedback on the workshop (Day-1)

Group Photo of Kawkareik Particpants (Day-2) Participants giving feedback on the workshop(Day-2, Kawkareik)

Participants in the training room (Day-2,Kawkareik) Awarding of Certificate to the PMU Officer (Day-2, Kawkareik)

Participants giving feedback on the workshop (Day- Participants giving feedback on the workshop(Day-2, 2,Kawkareik) Kawkareik)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Attendance List

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 5

Presentation Slides of Training / Workshop on Environmental and Social Safeguards, and Gender Awareness, Core Labor Standards and HIV/AIDS and Human Trafficking Awareness

WORKSHOP OUTLINE • Myanmar Development Challenges • CONTRACTOR’S safeguards obligations • Social Management Plan • Communication Strategy • Health and Safety Plan • Grievance Mechanism • Social and Gender Plan • HIV/AIDS • TIP • Contractor’s signing Statutory Understanding and Compliance and Commitment to combat Human Trafficking

Contractor’s Environmental and Social Management Plan (CESMP)

Contractor’s Environmental and Social CESMP Management Plan Environmental Management Plan and SMP EMP Social Management Plan

Health Social and Grievance and Communication Gender Action Redress Safety Strategy Plan Plan Mechanism Various Social Plan Plan

Labor Cat 2 & HIV/AIDS TIP Gender Welfare Equality 3

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Contractor’s Social Action Plan

Presented by Dr. Criste Z. Navida, Senior Resettlement Specialist

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

HIV/AIDS and STDs Plan

• Conduct awareness and prevention programs on HIV/AIDS and STDs – to all staff and laborers including their family – villages/communities – Secondary Schools and colleges and universities

MAKING ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE GENDER RESPONSIVE

Dr. Criste Z. Navida International Senior Resettlement Specialist

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

EWEC Gender Plan

 Within twenty-eight (28) days of the commencement Date and before commencing any construction on Site, the Contractor shall provide and implement a Gender Plan.  The Plan conforms fully to the Government’s Gender Strategy for this project.  The Plan shall be revised at the request of the Engineer without relieving the Contractor of any of his obligations or responsibilities under this Contract

• 2013 Gender Inequality Index 83rd of the 187 countries

• 2012 Social Institutions and Gender Index -44th of 86 countries and 8th of nine countries in East Asia and Pacific

Myanmar Gender Policies

� National Strategic Plan for the Advancement of Women (2013-2022)

Addresses gender equality and women’s rights comprehensively and that it responds to gender and other interfacing inequalities on livelihoods, participation in the economy, education, health care, violence, women leadership, political participation, and the peace processes. Based on the 12 priority areas of the Beijing Platform for Action of 1995.

� Constitution Section 347: All person equal rights before the law and equal legal protection. Section 348 – No discrimination against Mynamar citizen on the basis of sex.

� Framework for Economic and Social Reforms and the National Comprehensive Development Plan (2011-2030)

• Philippines only nation in the ASEAN region to make it to the global top 10

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

International�Gender�Equality�and�Women’s� Rights Commitments

• Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)- in 2012(acceded)

� Beijing Platform for Action (BPA) 2012 Recommendations for implementation of the National Strategic Plan for the Advancement of Women

 Improve sex-disaggregated data and gender statistics  Make gender equality, women’s economic rights and women empowerment integral to mandates and operating procedures  Ensure that the policies and strategies focus on economic growth and on generating decent employment for women.  Maintain public infrastructure projects as an employment and economic empowerment measure

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

 Ensure women’s inclusion, participation, and leadership at all levels and in all spheres of economic decision making

� United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDG). Goal 3 : Promote gender equality and empower women

 Crafting Gender Conscious FS TORs  Stakeholders Analysis  Standards for Gender Analyses  Gender-Aware Cost Benefit Analysis or Planning Balance Sheet Analysis  Reviewing the FS: Checking for Gender Sensitive Language and Consistency in Content and Substance

• Conducting Quick Participatory Gender Audits of Completed and Functional Road Infrastructure Projects and Rendering a Report

• Reviewing the Design: Checking for Consistency in Integrating Identified Gender Needs A Desk Review and Design Validation Exercise

• Maximizing the Potentials of the Programme of Work:

Ensuring Women Participation and Identifying Areas for Engaging Stakeholders during the Construction Stage

Gender Entry Points in the Project Development Cycle

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 6

GMS EWEC Eindu to Kawkareik Road Improvement Project (EKRIP) Livelihood Needs Assessment

A. Background and Rationale. Income (Livelihood) restoration is an important component of resettlement where Affected Persons (APs) have lost their productive base, businesses, jobs, or other income sources, regardless of whether they have also lost their houses. 1

The objectives of the livelihood restoration strategy are to minimize disruptions to existing livelihoods where possible, and to provide other assistance to those whose livelihoods are permanently affected to enable them to restore the livelihoods and income earning capacities.

Thus, a Livelihood Needs Assessment (LNA) shall be undertaken for EKRIP to evaluate on how the APs’ existing source(s) of income and livelihood activities were disrupted by the resettlement. To use the LNA findings to prepare relevant intervention in respond to the Affected Households (AHHs) or APs’ need.

B. Methodology. Data collection shall be carried out through focus group discussion (FGD). Four (4) separate FGDs: women, men, business owners and Daily wage earners. Additional information shall be derived from the individual interview for the District/village chiefs, religious leaders, CSO, and State Officials concerned.

C. LNA Team Composition will be the Burmese nationals from Construction Supervision Consultants(CSC) – three (3) and Project Management Unit, Ministry of Construction (PMU, MoC) – two (2)

D. Team Orientation will be conducted on December 12 (tentative), to discuss the process (questionnaire) and procedures of the FGDs. Divide the tasks according to the specific group to facilitate an efficient and comprehensive assessments.

E. Sample Size and Target Respondents. At least 10 participants for each FGD. The target respondents in the FGD are either the household heads or member of the household affected by the resettlement, randomly selected in the districts of Hpa-An and Kawkareik. Total FGD participants is eighty (80). (a) Women Group - 2 FGDs (b) Men Group - 2 FGDs (c) Business Owners Group - 2 FGDs (d) Daily Wage earners randomly selected 2 FGDs

F. FGD Questionnaire

A. Respondent Profile (Affected Person)

1 Chapter 7, Income Restoration, ADB Resettlement Handbook 41

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

NAME: Age: Sex: M/F Address:

Employed: Yes No What are the resettlement Impacts to your properties? Please check ( ) land ( ) house ( ) business shop ( ) kiosk ( ) crop ( ) rubber trees

B. Current Source of Income/Livelihood Activities & in the next six months Current Date Is it what is you Probability What are the tools, skills Income Started continuing plan in the to be and knowledge needed, Source/ next six (6) gainfully and/or activities required Livelihood months, if not engaged for you to be gainfully Activities currently within the engaged engaged next six gainfully? months?

Yes or No

C. Perception Interview questionnaire 1. What are livelihood and Income generating activities that are traditionally/culturally accepted? 2. What are the roles of women in the house? What are the roles of men in the house? Who makes the final decision? 3. What are the problems of women working in the locality? 4. Do women/children have access to basic services such as health, economic activities, education 5. What are the greatest needs of Men/Women/Youth in your locality 6. What kind of assistance do you need to get employed or improve your current income source? 7. What are your views of women working outside home? Any suggestions to empower women to get jobs outside home? 8. Are women well-represented in the business sector? If not, why? 9. If women will be provided with proper skills to work in road construction, will this be culturally accepted? 10. Do you have personal knowledge of government or CSO’s extension program such as trainings on livelihood?

G. Interview Outline for District/Village Chiefs, Religious Leaders, Kayin State Officers, and CSO.

A. Respondent Profile NAME: Age: Sex: M/F Position Organization Contract details:

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

B. Perception Interview questionnaire

1. What are livelihood and Income generating activities that are traditionally/culturally accepted? 2. If local women will be provided with proper skills to work in road construction, will this be culturally accepted? If not, why? 3. What are the challenges of women or men working in the locality? 4. Do women/children have access to basic services such as health, economic activities, education? 5. What are the greatest needs of men? Women? Youth? 6. What skill should women and men learn to increase their income? 7. What are your views of women working outside home? Any suggestions to empower women to get jobs outside home? 8. Are there any ongoing income-generating or livelihood development programs? (e.g., poverty alleviation) in the project area?

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 7

WORKSHOP ON SOCIAL ACTION PLAN

Social Management Planning and Workshop Report By: Dr. Criste Z. Navida, ISRS and Mr. Phyo Oo, NRSDS

Main Objective: Orientation on the Social Action Implementation Plan, including awareness on the prevention of human trafficking in road construction. Sub-Objectives: 1. To discuss the Social Action Plan within the context of the Contractors’ commitment on social safeguards. 2. To orient the participants on the relevance of prevention of human trafficking in road construction. Date and Venue 13 December 2018, CRBC Office & campsite Participants CSC- 8 and CRBC-7; Male 15; Female 3; Total Participant 18, refer to the attendance sheet and photo Outputs Achieved: 1. Contractor’s Social Action Implementation Plan- contextualizing the SAP Matrix by Contractor – end of December 2. Signed Contractor’s Commitment not to involve, to engage in human trafficking, and Contractor’s Statutory understanding and Compliance to Social Safeguards.

Questions and Answers Question Answer Mr. Tha Kyaw Zan asked to CRBC how Mr. Pyae Phyo (HSE Officer, CRBC) said that CRBC many times attended HIV/AIDS training for attended three times HIV/AIDS Training EKRIP Project Mr. Tha Kyaw Zan asked Dr. Criste Navida Dr. Criste replied according to communication protocol, about the Communication Protocol giving NRS and NES only report to CSC Team leader not direct example how the NRS and NES communicate to ADB ADB. Mr. Wang also agree with Mr. Tha Kyaw Zan Dr. Criste emphasize the importance of communication question protocol in project management. We should learn from the previous experience on the effect of limiting the sphere of stakeholders in communicating project information such in the case of Lun Nya quarry. From now on, let us now apply the communication protocol as discussed. Mr. Tha Kyaw Zan asked Dr. Criste Navida, Dr. Criste replied that it is very important to invite the on should the state minister be invited to State Minister concerned to attend a public meeting, attend in public consultation meeting. considering that he is also a stakeholder.

Mr. Pyae Phyo asked Dr. Criste about Service Dr. Criste replied that CRBC can use the modified ToR to Provider ToR and the reporting procedure hire a Service Provider. On the reporting requirement of such as monthly. Why the duration is only the service provider, she referred the CRBC to the ToR four months? description of the Deliverables and timelines. She likewise emphasized to the CRBC that the CSC/PMU will be responsible for the quality control of the reports. Four months was based on the number of target attendees to the awareness program based on the number of population on the communities along the EKRIP. Mr. Tha Kyaw Zan asked Dr. Criste about Dr. Criste said that based on the principle of transparency,

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

CSO directly complaining to ADB HQ everyone with interest on the project may elevate their concerns to the President of ADB. A similar case, happened in the Philippines for World Bank, ADB and Millennium Challenge Corporation funded project. The involvement of CSO or NGO in project implementation happens everywhere. Dr. Criste asked Mr. Wang’s opinion on the Mr. Wang said that slave labour is a criminal act. 2 videos on human trafficking in Myanmar Dr. Criste asked Mr. Y B Cho on the videos The hidden figure of TIP is money. Dr. Criste asked the Mr. Tha Kyaw Zan The root cause of TIP is poverty. opinion after watching the video Dr. Criste asked Daw Myat Hnin Khaing Myanmar is developing country so lack of education, opinion after watching the video inadequate income for their living. These lead to TIP Dr. Criste ask Hla Myat Noe(CRBC) opinion Lack of education and lack of knowledge can cause to after watching the video TIP. Dr. Criste ask the Myat Thinzar Our government cannot provide job opportunity, if they Kyaw(CRBC) opinion after watching the have job security, they will not be victim of TIP to foreign video country.

Feedback from the Participants Person Feedback Mr. Wang (CRBC) I learned teamwork, know contractor works well than before. I wish, we will try our best for finishing the project. Thank you so much Madam Mr. Bruce(CRBC) It is now clearer than before. Awareness is power that, I agree. Thanks to Madam for your presentation and sharing. Mr. Lee(CRBC) Thanks to Madam! I know now the definition of my job responsibility and duty based on the check list. Great knowledge about TIP and HIV/AIDS. Mr. Pyae Phyo (HSE Officer, CRBC) Learned a lot knowledge, thanks for revised SDIP. I hope more cooperation with the NES, NRS from now on. Mr. Nay Myo Thu (Site Engineer,CSC) Thanks to Madam for more knowledge about road safety, HIV/AIDS, force labour, TIP. I want to attend training again next time. Mr. Zaw Win (Site Engineer,CSC) Thanks to Madam for more knowledge about road safety, HIV/AIDS, force labour, TIP. I will share this knowledge to other people in our EKRIP Project. I want to attend training again next time Mr. Kaung Zaw (Safety Officer, CSC) Thanks to Madam for more knowledge about road safety, HIV/AIDS, forced labour, and TIP. I will share these knowledge to other people in our EKRIP Project. I want to attend training again next time Mr. Myo Min Kyaw (NES,CSC) More knowledge from each presentation slides. Mr. Y B Cho (Sr. Resident Engineer,CSC) Thanks for workshop. Dr. Criste was mobilize 20 Oct., just 7 weeks properly work and so many workshop and contribution for benefit to PMU,CSC, CRBC. Daw Myat Hnin Khaing (QS , CSC) Thanks for your Presentation, very impressive! I got a lot of knowledge which I have never knew before. Mr. Tha Kyaw Zan (DTL,CSC) This is my second workshop from Dr. Criste. I learned a lot of knowledge. In future, we will do according to the line of communication what Dr. Criste shared. Daw Hla Myat Noe (CRBC) Thanks for presentation. I am now aware of HIV/AIDS, slave/force labour, road safety and TIP. 45

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Daw Myat Thinzar Kyaw(CRBC) I got so many knowledge from presentation. I am now aware HIV/AIDS, slave/force labour, road safety and TIP.I try my best from now on to share this knowledge.

Photos

Group Photo Dr. Criste Navida Present the Presntation

Mr. Bruce discussion Participants in the training room

Awarding of Certificate Awarding of Certificate

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 8

Feedback Letters on EMP of New Quarry Site

To U Han Saw Managing Director Naw Tayar Myaing Co.,Ltd.

Subject: Giving the feedbacks upon the submitted EMP of road construction quarry production by the Naw Tayar Myaing Co.,Ltd.

Reference: 17-12-2018 EMP Submitted Letter of Naw Tayar Myaing Co.,Ltd.

1. Concerning with the above subject, in order to give the instructions and feedbacks on the submitted EMP for the quarry production works of road construction (5.0 acre) Area, Land Plot No. 769/1392 at Ka Maw Nyaw Region, Sun Free Village Tract Hpa An township Kayin State by the Naw Tayar Myaing Co.,Ltd. with the reference letter to issue Environmental Compliance Certificate.

2. We observed that the additional information/facts will be required after the analyzing and stand-alone as general in the EMP of the quarry production works of road construction of Naw Tayar Myaing Co.,Ltd.

3. Therefore, giving the feedbacks like that the additional information which is in the table of attached will be needed to add in the EMP of the quarry production works of road construction and will need to resubmit the revised EMP.

District Officer (Kyi Thar Hlaing, Deputy Director)

Copy- - Minister, Ministry of Environmental Conservation, Forest, Metal and Highway, Kayin State

- Office/Convoy

Environmental Conservation Department Director General Office Kayin State, Hpa City Letter No.1129/Ka Ya-(EIA)/2018

Date: 20 December 2018

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Date: 2 Jan 2019

To Director General Environmental Conservation Department Hpa An Kayin State

Subject: Resubmission of EMP Reference : Letter No 1129/KaYa- (EIA/2018), date 20 December 2018 from the Director General Office of Environmental Conservation Department in Hpa An Township, Kayin State.

According to the instructions of the Director General Office of Environmental Conservation Department in Hpa An Township, Kayin State with the above reference letter, resubmission of EMP for the quarry production works of road construction (5.0 acre) Area, Land Plot No. 769/1392 at Ka Maw Nyaw Region, Sun Free Village Tract Hpa An township by the Naw Tayar Myaing Co.,Ltd.

With Regards

Environmental Conservation U Han Saw Department Managing Director Director General Office Naw Tayar Myaing Kayin State, Hpa An City Co.,Ltd. Received Date : 2-1-2019 Letter No. 2/2018-19

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 9

Revised Grievance Redress Mechanism

ADB Loan 3310-MYA (SF) and 8294-MYA Greater Mekong Sub region (GMS) East-West Economic Corridor (EWEC) EINDU - KAWKAREIK ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

PROJECT LEVEL GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

Revised Edition – November 2018

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Prepared by the Ministry of Construction, Department of Highways, Project Management Unit for the Asian Development Bank

with assistance from the Contract Supervision Consultants (CSC): PEC/KEC JV in association with CRDCC Myanmar

Endorsement Letter for the Project Level Grievance Mechanism

The Government of Myanmar through the Ministry of Construction, Department of Highways has decided to construct the Greater Mekong Sub region (GMS): East-West Economic Corridor Eindu to Kawkareik Road Improvement Project. The project objectives are the following: 1) To further enhance the basic infrastructure level, making it suitable for all standard highway traffic whole year-round; 2) increase road connectivity within the Kayin State and with Thailand; and 3) upgrade the living standards of the residents, especially the Indigenous Peoples in the Project area. The project will improve a 66.4 km of a 2-lane national highway between the towns of Eindu and Kawkariek in Kayin State. Reconstruction of the existing pavement will be required, with some sections realigned to improve vehicle operating speed and road safety.

The Ministry of Construction (MOC), Department of Highways through the Project Management Unit (PMU) with assistance by the Contract Supervision Consultants (CSC) will implement the project in compliance with ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009), the Social Action Plan (SAP), the Resettlement and Ethnic Group Development Plan (REGDP), Project Level Grievance Mechanism, and other social safeguards. These documents fully comply with the requirements of the relevant laws, regulations, and policies of Myanmar and ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009).

The DOH Project Management Unit (PMU) affirms the implementation of the activities included in the SAP and other safeguards documents according to the principles of quality and within the duration of project loan implementation.

Ministry of Construction Department of Highways Project Management Unit

November 2018

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Greater Mekong Sub region (GMS): East-West Economic Corridor Eindu to Kawkareik Road Improvement Project Project Level Grievance Redress Mechanism

A. Background and Rationale:

1. The Department of Highways through the Project Management Unit (PMU) of the Ministry of Construction has established a Project Level Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) in a consultative manner with the project stakeholders and approved by the Myanmar government in August 2016. Subsequently, committee members were elected at Village, District, and State level. Followed with orientation for the GRM committee members held in October 2016. The orientation led to the preparation of the GRM manual and procedures for GRC members. The GRM manual and procedures contain the steps of complaint handling, a database for registering complaints, and forms and templates which the GRC members will use in processing complaints. The GRM members were provided training in February-March 2017. The GRM became effected on 8 October 2016.

B. Overall Objective: To reduce project related social risks that may arise during project implementation, offer the villagers/communities an effective platform for expressing concerns, and achieving solutions that will promote a constructive relationship between the government, consultant, contractor, and villagers/communities.

Sub-objectives: To receive, evaluate, and address complaints related to the environmental, social and gender safeguards performance, including construction and labor issues, from the affected individuals, particularly, the ethnic groups, the women and the vulnerable groups, and the villagers/communities.

C. Management of the GRM. The PMU and the Construction Supervision Consultant (PMU/CSC), including the Contractors will manage and facilitate the implementation of the GRM. The Monitoring of the GRM shall be the responsibility of the PMU with the assistance of District Officials.

D. An Open-Door Policy. The PMU/CSC shall maintain an Open-Door Policy to receive project related complaints/concerns, and shall be transparent in the evaluation and resolution of the complaints within the set time frame, with an assurance to the complainant that there will neither costs nor retribution associated with lodging a complaint.

E. The GRM process .

A. Publicize the Grievance Mechanism- A project information brochure will include the grievance mechanism and shall be widely disseminated throughout the project corridor by the safeguards officers of the Contractors. The project brochure shall include the Contact Person(s), usually the safeguards officers of the Contractors, and their contact numbers. The Contractors shall post the GRM on the Notice Board at construction sites.

B. The Entry level of complaints. For the Project Level GRM to be accessible and culturally appropriate for the local population, especially the ethnic groups, will make use of the existing well-established grievance redress mechanism of the Village. However, the complainant may file complaint directly either to the Contractor, or CSC or PMU.

C. Receive and register the complaints. The Village Chiefs, Contractors, CSC, and PMU may receive complaint/grievance either verbally or in writing. Although verbal complaints are promoted, as much as possible encourage the complainant(s) to have his or her concerns

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

accurately documented and properly registered in the Grievance Action Form (please refer to Annex 1).

D. Categories or types of Grievance at Project level.

Category I – Related to resettlement compensation, e.g., dispute on ownership of affected; Non-Agreement of an offered compensation package; Non-Agreement on the number and area of affected assets such as trees, structure; Delayed payment of compensation; and other related resettlement issues (complainant to specify). Category 2 – Construction Issues, e.g., Noise, vibration, and dust pollution during construction; Quality of work of the contractor; Interruption of utilities (water and electric); Road safety; Welfare and safety of workers; damage to adjacent properties not included in the compensation package; Water pollution in private and public water resource; Waterlogged/flooding; damage to access road or access to properties; Road accidents (community safety); Damage to environment and cultural properties; and other construction related issues(complainant to specify). Category 3 – Employee/Labor Related Issues, e.g., Non-payment of wages and overtime pay, including delayed payment of wages; Labor wage below the government prescribed rate; Sexual harassment; Human trafficking; HIV/AIDS; Child labor; and other labor/employee related issues (Complainant to specify).

E. Composition of the Grievance Redress Committees:(Contact details refer to Annex 2) a. Village Administrative Units Grievance Redress Committee i. Village (Chairman) ii. Members: Village tract head (with specific concern), at least one female representative of the community b. Project Level Grievance Redress Committee i. PMU (Chairman) ii. CSC (Vice –Chairman) iii. Members: CSC, Contractor, Village Chief (with specific concern), Representative from AHHs, at least one female member of the village, representative from NGO in the locality c. District Grievance Redress Committee i. District Chief (Chairman) ii. PMU (Vice Chairman) iii. Members: a) CSC/Contractor b) Local Administrative Unit (District/ Village Chief) c) Recognized Civil society (1 representative) d) Other Government agencies representatives e) At least one female representative of the community

NOTE: The GRC members shall be officially designated/appointed to the position to ensure accountability and responsibility. This maybe in the form of Agreement among parties.

F. Project Level GRM Process (Please refer to next page)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Project Level Grievance Redress Mechanism Tiers Grievance Process Time Frame Level 1 Complainant notifies or GRC Village register Grievance using the Project Level Grievance Action 2 days GRC submits grievance to Form. Village the Village Chief Categorize Complaints: 1) Resettlement, 2) Construction, and 3) Level Employee/Labor. Refer to the GRC Project Level

Level 2 Review, Investigate, and 7 days GRC resolve grievance. Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 (Min) Project Level Resolved? Resettlement Construction Employee/Labor N ?

Dust, Noise, Vibration, quality of work, interruption Non-payment/delayed in Y Reject Offer, Dispute of payement of wages, sexual ownership, non-agreement of utilities, road safety, harassment, human on the number of impacts, maintenance, damage to Documentation trafficking, low wages, child delayed payment, etc cultural properties, access labor, HIV/AIDS road, etc.

PMU/CSC CSC/Contractor Contractor Level 3 Depends GRC on the District/ Case example: Legal issues beyond the project’s authority; Policy issues that nature would require approval from the mandated organization. of the State issue Level

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 1 PROJECT LEVEL GRC ACTION FORM-1 (To be filled by receiving GRC officer) PROJECT INFORMATION Date Received:

Name of

Project

Name of Contractor Received by: Name and Signature PERSONAL INFORMATION OF THE COMPLAINANT Name Date of birth (day/month/year) Spouse Date of birth (day/month/year) Name Complete Address Occupation Contact Details NARRATION OF THE GRIEVANCE OR CONCERN

CATEGORY (Encircle appropriate Category of Grievance, as enumerated below) CATEGORY I. Related to resettlement compensation a. dispute on ownership of affected asset b. non-agreement of offered compensation package/reject offer c. non-agreement on the number and area of affected assets such as trees, area and dimension of structure d. delayed payment of compensation e. other resettlement related issues (complainant to specify)

CATEGORY II. Construction Issues

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

a. Noise, vibration, and dust pollution during construction b. quality of workmanship of the contractor c. interruption of utilities (water and electric) d. road safety e. welfare and safety of workers f. damage to adjacent properties not included in the compensation package g. water pollution in private and public water resource h. waterlogged/flooding i. damage to access road or access to properties j. Road accidents (community safety) k. Damage to environment and cultural properties l. other issues (complainant to specify) CATEGORY III. Employee/Labor Issues a. Non-payment of wages and overtime pay, including delayed payment of wages b. Labor wage below the government prescribed rate c. Sexual harassment d. Human trafficking e. HIV/AIDS f. Child labor g. Other issues (Complainant to specify)

TYPE OF ACTION (Encircle appropriate action taken) a. Resolved at Village or District Level b. Referred to Contractor/CSC/PMU REFERRAL DETAILS Name of Authority Office Position Date of referred:

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION OF RESOLUTION OF THE GRIEVANCE:

PREPARED BY: POSITION: OFFICE NUMBER REFERENCE TO DATABASE:

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 2 DIRECTORY OF GRC Project Level Committee Members DISTRICT OF HPA-AN CONTACT DETAILS NAME OF CONTACT POSITION PERSON CELLPHONE EMAIL ADDRESS NUMBER Eindu Lun Nya

DISTRICT OF KAWKAREIK CONTACT DETAILS NAME OF CONTACT POSITION CELLPHONE EMAIL ADDRESS PERSON NUMBER

Contractor CONTACT DETAILS NAME OF CONTACT POSITION CELLPHONE EMAIL ADDRESS PERSON NUMBER

CSC CONTACT DETAILS NAME OF CONTACT POSITION CELLPHONE EMAIL ADDRESS PERSON NUMBER

PMU/MoC CONTACT DETAILS NAME OF CONTACT POSITION CELLPHONE EMAIL ADDRESS PERSON NUMBER

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 10 Monthly Noise Monitoring Results, July to December 2018

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 11 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Results, July to December 2018

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 12

Minutes of Public Consultation held on October 12 2018 for New Quarry (Sun Free Village Tract)

The public consultation meeting concerned with Sanfree Quarry was conducted at 15:00am on 12th October 2018 at monastery of Sanfree village. Representatives from the Employer, CSC, Contractor and the stakeholders attended this public consultation meeting and open discussion. The meeting minute was prepared for being informed to authorities concerned.

Participants

STAKEHOLDER/ EMPLOYER /OTHER CSC CONTRACTOR OTHER Mr. Banya - Assistant Mr. Kyuho Yoon - Team Mr. Fan Yuxin - CRBC Mr. Saw Han Saw - Director, PMU Leader Project Manager Quarry Owner Mr. Kyaw Thu Ya - Mr. Li Yuliang - CRBC Mr. Tha Kyaw Zan - Assistant Director/Hpa.an Plant& Equipment Monks/Villagers Deputy TL MOC Engineer Mr. Phyo Myint Oo - Mr. Bruce - CRBC Ms. Pwint Phya - PMU National Resettlement Commercial Manager Specialist Naing Win – National Mr. Pyae Phyo - CRBC Environment Specialist H.S.E

Meeting minutes for Open Discussion

No. Particulars Descriptions Remarks 1. Venue Sun Free quarry mine Sun Free Village onastery 2. Time 3:00pm-4:00pm

3. Date October 12, 2018

5. Discussion Development of new quarry site Requirements from the stakeholders Topic 6. Highlights of  All the monks and villagers agree and  Since it’s good for the Discussion support the rock to be used for the development of Kayin State. and Eindu - Kawkareik Road Improvement Monks, villagers and the quarry Agreements Project. owner have already discussed and finalized everything before this public consultation. The purpose of this consultation held by the Monk head is just to confirm whether there’s any question or difficulty from any other party.

 Monks and villagers request to provide  CRBC agrees to upgrade the access road and electricity for the access road to the quarry. Quarry village. owner will try to discuss with the government authorities about the rural electrification.

 The monk head confirmed that the  The quarry owner promised, this quarry owner, Naw Tayar Myaing Ltd, is for the society development, it is really necessary for 66

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

will offer the CSR funding. development of Sanfree village.

 All the parties agreed to solve the problems by working close  How to solve the potential conflicts in together. The Monk head future? promise that he will solve all the problems if happens.

Attendance Sheets

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Photos of Consultation

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Annex 13

Consultation Meeting Documentation

Date: 4 November 2018 (Sunday) Time: 8:45 to 10:00 AM Venue: Sun Free Quarry Site, Wa Pu La Monastery, San Free Village, Hpa-an Township Name of Participant Participants: Sayar U Tha Kyaw Zan (Deputy Team Leader, CSC), Daw Moe Pwint Phyu (PMU), Phyo Myint Oo (NRS,CSC) and Naing Win (NES,CSC)

The CSC and PMU conducted the site visit on 4 November 2018 with the villagers who live near the san free mountain, Wa Pu La Monk and mountain owner (U Saw Han Saw, MD , Naw Tayar Myaing Co.,Ltd) at the Wa Pu La monastery, Hpa-an Township. The summary of discussion points, key issues and concern raised/ discussed are shown in the table below.

No. Speaker Complaints/ Key Issue Raised, Key Answer and/or Action Name Discussion Points and Activities Taken 1 Wa Pu La The monk said that “we made complaint Sayar U Tha Kyaw Zan Monk only to other group mining activities responsed that if the which is located near the under monk and village are construction Buddha statue and Buddha not complaint, that is garden. We are pleased to accept and no fine and U Saw Han complaint to Naw Ta yar Myaing Co.,Ltd Saw will do ongoing (U Saw Han Saw). U Saw Han Saw process for quarry and quarry is far from the Buddha Statue and mining permission. Buddha Garden location and village for 1.5 mile or 2 mile.” 2 U Saw Han U Saw Han Saw said that “our quarry is Sayar U Tha Kyaw Zan Saw (MD, 1.5or 2 miles far from the village and the response that please Naw Tayar complaint letter is not for us and this make sure the process Myaing complaint was made for other party which is EMP to ECC ; Co.,Ltd) mining activities which is located near no need EIA and please Buddha statue and Buddha Garden. All kindly show the the villagers and the monk agree with documentation for the him for the quarry stone production. He this permission for the has built ten tower for electricity in EMP to ECC. village and the electric supply permit will be soon issued from Union Minister of electricity.

Now we are ongoing process for EMP. If we will finish EMP, we will get ECC and if got ECC, will start for production.

The state level government official (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation) has told to

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

U Saw Han Saw that “Eindu Kawkareik road improvement project is the state or government project so it may need only EMP to ECC and no need EIA) 5 Sayar Tha Now we are visiting the site of the sun The Sun Free monk Kyaw Zan free quarry, sun free village and Wa Pu responsed that we (DTL,CSC) La Monastery to clear the complaint complaint only to the letter which has received from Kayin other group mining State government. The letter is prepared activities which has and sent by the Group of Senior Monks located near big and some farmers from Sun Free Area to Buddha statue and the Kayin State Government in Hpa An. Buddha Garden. We are pleased to accept and no complaint for Naw Ta yar Myaing Co.,Ltd (U Saw Han Saw). U Saw Han Saw quarry is far from the village around 1.5 or 2 mile.

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Photos

DTL ( CSC) and PMU site visit to Sun free quarry DTL(CSC),PMU and U Saw Han Saw discussion

The monk, U Saw Han Saw and DTL discussion The Monk and DTL discussion

Sun free quarry Sun free quarry

The way to big Buddha Status and garden The way to Sun free quarry

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 14 Status of Concerns raised by AHs during earlier Missions in 2018

Grievance Details with Location Findings or Proposed Findings/Actions Three Potentially affected HHs in Ma CSC verified that one of these HHs Ni Gone village (covered under Lot 1). was affected, which is a shop. (Note: from March 2018 Mission) Compensation will be included in phase 3. Rubber tree cutting issue Km 21+880 The rubber plantation owner (Note: from 7-9 May 2018 Mission) complained that 2 additional young rubber trees were removed by the contractor though only two trees were affected. The contractor apologized to the owner and assured compensation according to compensation entitlement matrix of REGDP. Compensation was paid on 9 July 2018. CSC is waiting for supporting documents. Contractor operating beyond Stakeholders complained that the demarcated construction limit and contractor stepped outside the destroying the village name sign board demarcated construction limit to Km 20+420. private lands, which is intimidating to (Note: from 7-9 May 2018 Mission) the land owners. In one case the village name sign board was destroyed, which the villagers requested to be replaced by a new one. The contractor assured to avoid such happenings in future and to replace the signboard by mid-June 2018. Signboard reportedly replaced. CSC is waiting for supporting documents. Affected well in Km 39+480 The PMU agreed with the well owner (Note: from 7-9 May 2018 Mission) to provide compensation of MMK1.5 million (about $1,100, which is in line with the entitlement matrix of REDGP); also agreed was to provide a new tube well as replacement, which will be co- used by the contractor to water supply during road construction, but will be entirely for the affected person’s use once the road construction has been completed. To be completed within third batch of compensation, and provide a new tube well by October 2018. CSC to monitor. The farmers from the project affected PMU/CSC has contacted the regional areas raised their concerns about irrigation department; however, some blocked irrigation channels which is irrigation channels cleared by the affecting their farms productivity. contractor and this issue has been Location: Km 36+200. reported as resolved by CSC. Villagers (Note: from 24-26 May 2018 Mission) claimed some areas remained to be cleared. For confirmation by CSC and update during next review mission and in next environment safeguards

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

Grievance Details with Location Findings or Proposed Findings/Actions monitoring report (ESMR). Villagers from Yoemahar village raised CSC investigated and reported there the issue that their palm trees were cut was no evidence produced as to who and they did not receive any was responsible for cut trees. CSC has compensation. reported this to the AHs and no further (Note: from 24-26 May 2018 Mission) issues have been raised. Many AHs raised their concerns on the Ongoing. issue of lack of clarity regarding peg This is related to disagreement over markings within their assets. the position of land boundaries with (Note: from 24-26 May 2018 Mission) respect to road edge described above. PMU/CSC is seeking a solution such that the households’ land will no longer be affected by the road construction (see para 23).

Summary of issues unresolved or newly raised by AHs during July 2018 Mission and current Mission Grievance Details with Location Findings or Proposed Findings/Actions Flooding issue Km 32+450 A temporary impact of flooding after early May (Remark: Partially resolved) rains was reported by one household due to clearing and grubbing activity by the contractor. The contractor provided drainage and temporary retaining wall. The contractor has constructed the drainage system. The CSC confirmed resolution of this issue. The AH informed that she lost crops and also incurred expenses for constructing a temporary wall to protect her house from flooding before the contractor provided the temporary retaining wall. The Mission reiterated the AH to file a complaint through GRM and this will be addressed by the GRC. CSC to monitor and follow up on this. One HH from Km 25+645 raised issue The Mission visited the site together with the concerning the flooding in this land plot due to contractor, CSC, the AH and the 24 Village the blockage of drainage by road embankment Committee’s chairperson. The issue has not works. been resolved as of the current mission and CSC to further discuss with the contractor to monitor: compensation for the died trees due to water stagnation; and sufficiency of remedied drainage. For the compensation of damaged crops, the GRC will address this as the AH has filed the complaint to GRM on 3 July 2018. CSC to monitor on this. One AH (Km 22+650) informed about CSC confirmed inclusion of the plot in her second affected plot not included second list for which LARC verification in DMS, and complained about is awaited (DMS targeted for construction of road in the plot without completion by end August 2018 but did payment of compensation. not happen and expected to happen in October 2018). CSC to ensure verification of plot by LARC and accordingly include under REGDP addendum to be completed by 15 December 2018.

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

During the site visit it was confirmed that the civil work is in progress in the stretch but limited to the available COI and not affecting the land of the complainant. Location Km 20+450 one AH has not CSC to ensure re-verification of received compensation for affected location of this plot by LARC and fence and teak trees and disagree with include under REGDP addendum. his land measurement. The Mission found that there is now a difficulty in tracking the complainant to verify the grievance. CSC to continue monitoring. AH (Km 2+470) informed that the During site visits the Mission found the temporary access to the road side issue has been resolved. houses by the contractor during the Regarding draining, temporary construction have been completed and drainage has already been provided by the AH is satisfied. the contractor. CSC has approved Also, AH complained about shop drawings for the permanent overflowing drainage near her design for retaining wall. farmland.

The land owner informed the existing CSC will explore the possibility of irrigation channel (Km 4+500) is being shifting the channel beyond the COI damaged due to proposed road and modify the shop drawings widening which was used for the accordingly. irrigation during dry season. One AH (Km 34+600) informed that The contractor agreed to provide hard her house wall is just adjacent to the fencing here adjacent to the house proposed toe of road embankment and structure during construction period. the construction activity will pose safety threats to house structure. Tree stumps unremoved in: Km 47 to The contractor assured to remove all 48 (right hand side), Km 48+400 to stumps by 20 October 2018; CSC to 49+600 (both sides); Km 50+700 to monitor. 50+900 (right hand side); and Km 52+200 to 52+300 (right hand side).

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 15

Bi – Monthly Monitoring Report for December 2018

5th Bi-Monitoring of Contractor’s Compliance to the Findings and Recommendations of ADB Mission in March 2018

Date of Monitoring: 18.12.18 Weather Conditions: Sunny

# Issues Recommendations Findings during this monitoring 1 Tree Cutting and Residual Location: Disposal of remnants of cut trees currently dumped There were no activities for cutting of Along the road along roadsides consistent with national and local trees. No tree residuals along Lot 1 and (Lot 1 and Lot regulation. Lot 2. 2) 2 Dust Location:  Undertake water spraying in construction sites  Some road sections were dusty, no along the road where there are sensitive receptors such as houses, water spraying done (Photo 1) (Lot 1 and Lot shops, schools, temples, medical facilities, and  Sprayed some road sections were 2) other structures. Water spraying will be done at observed during the monitoring time. least 4 times a day, i.e. twice in the morning and (Photo 8) twice in the afternoon. Additional spraying will be done, as necessary.  Provide nets to households to help reduce dust levels. 3 Concrete Batching Plants Location: Km  Prohibit burning of all types of waste generated at  Trace of waste burning was observed 14 and 37 the construction sites, workers’ camps, and other at the Batching Plant Site at Km 37. project-related facilities and activities. (Photo 2).  Transport waste to public dumpsites.  In Km 14 and 37 the drainages go to  Need to remove solid waste from the tank and the first settling tanks. should improve the ditches as impervious bed and  Settling tanks were dry, but need to be appropriate gradient and depth. cleaned.  Need to increase the roofs height in order to check  The roofs of the tanks have not inside. enough height to check inside. 4 Spoil Disposal Site (Km 12) Location: Km  Undertake slope stabilization measures to avoid  The Contractor provided terraced 12 erosion onto adjoining areas and water slope, but vegetation was removed. courses/bodies.  There is no provision for drainage.  Observe safety precautions for people/locals who  Disposed solid waste was observed at would haul materials from the site. the soil disposal site. (Photo 10)  Provide drainage to minimize erosion during rainy periods  Need to stop the disposing of domestic solid waste instead of transporting to the public disposal sites. 5 Chemical / Oil and Bitumen Drums Location: the  Construct proper storage facilities (with concrete  It was properly arranged and kept CRBC Camp floor, roof and spill containment system) for clean. Site and AC hazardous substances/materials.  The bitumen drums were located on

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

# Issues Recommendations Findings during this monitoring Plant  Should relocate these bitumen drums on the the bare ground covered by the impervious tarpaulin sheets and put some tarpaulin sheets. (Photos 13 and 14) thickness of sand layer over the impervious  Oil Spillage was observed at the tarpaulin sheet to take back the leakage bitumen on Fuel Tank in AC Plant Yard. (Photo the sand layer easily to reuse. 11)  Need to clean by scraping off the spillage and dispose in hazardous waste storage area in workshop for future disposal. 6 Fabrication Yard (Km 14) Location: Km  Install proper drainage to direct surface run-off  There is a drainage system at the 14 away from flood-prone areas and water sources. periphery of the maintenance areas and the drainage was arranged for free flow (no obstacles). 7 Workers Camp Location: Km  Prohibit burning of all types of waste  There was no trace of burning was 14 +000 generated at the construction sites, observed at CRBC Camp Site and workers’ camps, and other project-related Batching Plant at Km 14 facilities and activities.  Plastic Wastes were spread in the  Transport waste to public dumpsites. backyard of Worker Camp. (Photo 7) 8 Workers Safety Location:  Provide full PPEs to all workers, both temporary  During the inspection, the workers along the road and regular along the road were equipped with (Lot 1 and Lot  Toolbox briefings to be conducted at least twice a PPEs. 2) week.  The HSE officer had been informed  Regular monitoring of wearing PPEs to be done by this requirement for tool box briefings contractor’s HSE officer/s and regular monitoring at the inspection time. 9 Traffic and Public Safety Location:  Provide safe access along open excavation/side  There were installed road safety signs along the road drain works to prevent falls. and other facilities. (Lot 1 and Lot  Install sufficiently visible construction and 2) excavation warning signs at 100 meters, 50 meters and 25 meters before the construction sites 10 Grievance Redress Mechanism  NES and NRSDS would like to be given the  One day workshop was conducted by training by ADB before conduct consultations with CSC, PMU and LARC on 28th and village officials on additional arrangements / 29th November 2018 at CSC Office in channels preferred by affected persons for filing Hpa An and Kawkareik separately. grievances.  The National Social Safeguards Specialist from CSC requested a training providing from ADB in the 9th July mission. 11 Project Information Location: Prior to site works, village officials must be informed  The HSE Officer has been reminded Along the road of the schedule and scope of work. of this requirement for project (Lot 1 and Lot information. 2) 12 Health, Safety, and

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

# Issues Recommendations Findings during this monitoring Environment (HSE) Assistants CRBC Office Contractor needs to hire two qualified HSE assistants  One HSE assistant has been hired, to work under the Health and Safety Environment with a degree in Forestry. However (HSE) Officer. due to work stoppage, the assistant is currently on leave. 13 CEMP a) Contractor has already submitted the b) revised CEMP on 12 Oct 2018 to CSC and CSC submitted to PMU on 17 Oct 2018.

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

PHOTOS 1. Dusty road not sprayed 2. Trace of Burning at Batching Plant (Km Some road sections needed to spray water as dust 37) suppressing acitivity

3. Fire Extinguishers Inspection 4. Ditches to the Settling Tanks (Km 14 and Contractor’s HSE Officer should check the expired 37) date and conditions as regular inspection. Batching Plant Sites, the makeshift open ditch which leads the waste water (slurry) to sedimentation tanks does not have impervious bed and insufficient and shallow.

5. Settling Tank at 14 Km 6. PPEs Requirement at Km 14 Workshop in Batching Plant Site at Km 14, Settling tanks were Camp Site dry and one tank has full of solid waste were Worker was not equipped with adequate personal observed during the monitoring time. protective equipment (PPE)

7. Backyard of Worker Camp Site (Km 14+000) 8. Water Sprayed As Dust Suppression Plastic Wastes were spread in the Worker Camp Spraying water was observed at some sections Site. along the road during the monitoring time

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

9. Borrow Site (Km 14+300) 10. Soil Disposal Site at Km 12+340 GPS Location - N 16.71629°, E 97.84349°, N Disposed solid waste was observed at the soil 16.71151°, E 97.86221° , N 16.71144°, E disposal site. GPS Location - N 16.71629°, E 97.86189°, N 16.71164°, E 97.86255° 97.84349°

11. AC Plant Site (Between 5 Km and 6 Km) 12. Provision of Garbage Bins Oil Spillage was observed at the Fuel Tank

13. Storage of Bitumen Drums at Camp Site 14. Storage of Bitumen Drums at AC Plant Site (Km 14) (between Km 5 and 6 ) Bitumen drums were located at the bare ground Bitumen drums were located at the bare ground

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT EINDU-KAWKAREIK ROAD PROJECT

ANNEX 16

GRIEVANCE REGISTRY FOR DECEMBER 2018

Category # Station L (m) Name of AHHs Nature of Complaint LARC Action New 1 Km27+420(RHS), 15 Owner name: Daw Ma The AP rejected the DMS survey because her DMS Survey cannot be Length 15m Chaw(ph:09780829566) request to reclassify her garden to residential conducted. land was denied by the LARC based on the land records of the Department of Land Recor her land is classified as garden land.

New 2 K27+430(LHS) Owner name: Daw Mue Tar The AP rejected to have her land surveyed by DMS Survey cannot be (09798443202). the LARC because the her request to have conducted. compensation for both the land and trees was denired by the LARC. The LARC's decision was to compensate only for the trees. Despite the explanation of the LARC members and the NSRDS, the AP still rejected to have the DMS Survey. Hence, LARC omitted this place. New 3 K27+440~460(LH 20 Owner name: Daw Nan A Mwe The AP rejected her land surveyed by the LARC DMS Survey cannot be S),Length 20m (09768690663) because the AP's request for compensation for conducted. the whole house (fully affected) alledgely due to safety was not granted by the LARC. Based on the actual measurement the house will be partially affected and there was no risks on safety based on the road design.