DOCSLIB.ORG

Ostrauskas on the Genesis of Kunda Culture. A.Sorokin's Hypothesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ostrauskas on the Genesis of Kunda Culture. A.Sorokin's Hypothesis DISCUSSIONS ON thE GENEsis OF Kunda CULtuRE. A. SORokin’S HYPothEsis. COMMEnts On The GenesisCulture. Of Kunda A.Hypothesis. Sorokin’s Comments TOMAS OSTRAUSKAS RAUSKAS T S TOMAS TOMAS O Introduction northwestern cultures, including Kunda culture. Ac- cording to Kozlowski, cultures of this circle formed at Though Mesolithic Kunda culture is one of the earliest the start of the Holocene Period after the convergence explored prehistoric European and global phenomena of a wave of migration from Siberia and the inherit- of this period, the question of its genesis is still a source ance of Swiderian culture, including some supposi- of passionate debates among researchers. In this arti- tional influence of the northern Black Sea coast. The cle, I will attempt to discuss it with Sorokin, the Rus- northwest circle of cultures included northern forest sian archaeologist and famous researcher of the Upper territories from the Baltic Sea to the Urals (Kozłowski Volga and the Oka river basins in the Late Palaeolithic 1971, 69-71). In subsequent studies, Kozlowski related and Mesolithic ages. In 1999, Sorokin presented, apart the appearance of the northwest circle of cultures in from other hypotheses, a detailed and reasoned hypoth- the northern part of Eastern Europe only to westward esis of the genesis of Kunda culture, which treats the expanded Siberian cultures (Kozłowski, Kozłowski question as a cultural process in the wider Mesolithic 1977, 242-243). In his latest summarising study about context of the East European forest region. I address the Polish Mesolithic Age, he draws a curtain over the this study to researchers of the Late Palaeolithic and question of Kunda culture, though he attributes it to the Mesolithic ages in Eastern Europe with the proposal northwest circle of cultures together with the Nemunas to consider it an invitation for discussions to promote and Kudlaevka cultures (Kozłowski 1989, 177-179). further research of the genesis of Kunda culture. This position taken by the researcher probably proves that the question of the Kunda’s genesis is not obvious to him. In the Eighties and Nineties of the 20th cen- The history of research into tury, most researchers would relate Kunda culture to the genesis of Kunda culture Swiderian culture, though indirectly, since they were At the end of the 19th century C. Grewingk, the first embarrassed by typological and technological differ- researcher of Kunda settlement in northern Estonia, at- ences in collections of flint artefacts. The Lithuanian tempted to link its origin to Finno-Ugric tribes, which Stone Age researcher R. Rimantienė noted a few com- came from Finland or Sweden (Янитс 1959, 7). The ponents which were characteristic of the formation of interwar Estonian archaeologist R. Indreko initially the above culture: Maglemosian and Askola cultures, derived Kunda culture from Palaeolithic centres of together with the inheritance of Swiderian culture Central and Western Europe (Indreko 1948, 398). from the southeast, probably from the Valdaj highlands Later, however, he changed his mind and related its (Rimantienė 1984, 94). A similar attitude is taken by origin to Borshevo 1 type settlements with stemmed L.V. Kolcov. Like Rimantienė, he derives separate el- spearheads from the Don-Desna region in the Late ements of Kunda culture from different cultures. He Palaeolithic Period (Indreko 1964, 58-61). In a study thinks that the flint inventory of Kunda culture formed summarising explorations of Stone Age Estonia, and its bone and horn tools under the influence of Swide- published in Estonia in 1959, the archaeologist L. Jan- rian and Ahrensburg cultures, its schist and quartz of its assumes that, though the material for findings is Duvensee-Maglemosian cultural communities, and of not sufficient, Kunda culture probably formed several Askola culture from southern Finland. According to multi-original elements: Askola culture and the im- this Russian scientist, the influence of Swiderian cul- pacts of the south and east (Янитс 1959, 327-328). At ture dominated (Кольцов 1977, 134; 1979, 24). To the the beginning of the Seventies, the Polish researcher Latvian researcher I. Zagorska, early Mesolithic Latvi- S.K. Kozlowski hypothesised about a huge circle of an and Estonian Pulli-type settlements derive from 198 the late Palaeolithic Salaspils Laukskola settlement in Sorokin’s hypothesis on the genesis of the lower reaches of the Daugava. She relates this set- Kunda culture and a critique of it tlement to Swiderian and Ahrensburg cultural monu- ments in Lithuania, Byelorussia and Poland (Загорска In 1995 the Muscovite archaeologist A. Sorokin pro- 1981, 63-64). The Estonian researcher K. Janits and posed an unusual solution to the question of the gene- TICA 6 TICA the Byelorussian archaeologist V.P. Ksenzov derive sis of Kunda culture (Sorokin 1999). In his 2002 study L Kunda culture from Swiderian culture (Янитс 1990, “Mesolithic of Zhizdra Polesie” the researcher pro- 30; Kсензов 1994, 24). The famous Ukrainian archae- posed a slightly widened hypothesis on the genesis of BA ologist L. Zalizniak believes Kunda culture and other Kunda culture (Сорокин 2002, 120-122). According post-Swiderian cultures derive from Swiderian culture to this hypothesis, Reseta, Kunda and Butovo cultures OGIA (Зализняк 1989, 80-89). The Polish archaeologist (the first and the third are spread between the basins of EL Z. Sulgostowska analysed research on the transition the Volga and Oka rivers) make up different stages of CHA period from Palaeolithic to Mesolithic in the Eastern one single chain of cultural development. According to R Baltic region and points to gaps which do not allow us him, Pulli-type settlements of Kunda culture in Latvia A to prove undoubtedly genetic ties between Swiderian and Estonia reflect the seasonal migration of people of and Kunda cultures (Sulgostowska, 1999). The most Reseta culture from the Upper Volga, along the Dau- significant among them are presented below. gava valley and to the Eastern Baltic region in the pre- Boreal Period. Sorokin distinguishes an early period Researchers have only isolated radio-carbonic dates in Kunda culture, that is, Pulli-type settlements. He regarding both Late Swiderian and Kunda cultures, so thinks the links between settlements of the early stage it makes it impossible to identify precisely the time of with settlements of the Boreal Period (Kunda-Jalavere) the extinction of the first culture and the time of the ori- are not proven (Сорокин 2002, 120). He believes only gin of the second, and to elaborate their interrelations. the understratum of Pulli and Lepakoze settlements However, the strongest argument of sceptics on the can be attributed to the early stage of Kunda culture. Swiderian origin of Kunda culture is the different flint According to Sorokin, hunting tools and relics of flint processing technique and the typological composition tools discovered have no analogues in other Mesolithic of flint tools. The primary treatment of flint, based on settlements of the Eastern Baltic region. He believes direct split by soft hammerstone, separating irregular the genesis of Pulli-type settlements cannot be related blades from two-end cores, is typical of Swiderian cul- to Swiderian culture, as no one-edged spearheads and ture. The basic types of artefacts are stemmed arrow- micro-blades, no retouched blades or micro-burin tech- heads, scrapers and burins. The latter are either central, nique, and so on, have been discovered in Swiderian shaped with different side percussion, or sidelong and culture. Nevertheless, he finds these and other (eg Re- transversal, shaped by retouch and percussion (Sulgo- seta-type microlithic spearheads) peculiarities only in stowska 1989, 38-57). Pressure technique, which im- Reseta cultures which existed in the basins of the Volga plies the percussion of regular blades from one-end, and Oka rivers in the early Kunda period. It appears mostly conical cores, is dominant in Kunda culture. from this that Sorokin’s hypothesis is the only one to Arrowheads, including stemmed ones, as well as bur- “discover” complexes of settlements which directly ins, are mostly shaped by percussion at the broken ends stimulated the formation of features typical of Kunda of the blades and by waste flakes, though burins shaped culture. These are the Reseta 3 settlement, and the un- by retouch and percussion are not unusual either. The derstratum of the Ust’-Tudovka 4 settlement (Сорокин widespread blade-shaped technique, when numerous 2002, 121-122). In addition, he thinks both the micro- microlithic flint blades with retouched sides and ends, burin technique and Reseta-type microlithic spear- elements of former stone hunting tools, are discovered, heads from Pulli-type settlements are vanishing relics is noteworthy (Ostrauskas 2000: 2002a, 98; 2000b, (Сорокин 2002, 122); therefore, Pulli-type settlements 78). are related to the later period, while the Reseta 3 settle- Summarising briefly the attitudes of the origin of ment is datable to an earlier period than that of the Pulli Kunda culture, the researchers can be divided into two settlement. Spearheads in Butovo culture settlements groups. Some of them link it to large-scale migration (eg Butovo, Prislon settlement), typical of Pulli-type from the east (from Siberia). Others link the genesis of complexes, indicate that some types of Butovo spear- Kunda culture to Swiderian culture of the late Palaeo- head originate from those belonging to Pulli-type com- lithic Period, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fortified Settlements in the Eastern Baltic: from Earlier Research to New Interpretations
    Vilnius University Press Archaeologia Lituana ISSN 1392-6748 eISSN 2538-8738 2018, vol. 19, pp. 13–33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/ArchLit.2018.19.2 Fortified Settlements in the Eastern Baltic: From Earlier Research to New Interpretations Valter Lang Department of Archaeology, Institute of History and Archaeology University of Tartu 2 Jakobi St., 51014 Tartu, Estonia [email protected] A brief history of research and earlier interpretations of fortified settlements east of the Baltic Sea are provided in the first part of the article. The earlier research has resulted in the identification of the main area of the distribution of fortified settlements, the main chronology in the Late Bronze and Pre-Roman Iron Ages, and their general cultural and economic character. It has been thought that the need for protection – either because of outside danger or social tensions in society – was the main reason for the foundation of fortified sites. The second part of the article adds a new possibility of interpreting the phenomenon of fortified settlements, proceeding from ethnogenesis of the Finnic and Baltic peoples. It is argued that new material culture forms that took shape in the Late Bronze Age – including fortified settlements and find assemblages characteristic of them – derived at least partly from a new population arriving in several waves from the East-European Forest Belt. Keywords: fortified settlements, East Baltic, Bronze Age, ethnic interpretation. Įtvirtintos gyvenvietės Rytų Baltijos regione: nuo ankstesnių tyrimų prie naujų interpretacijų Pirmoje straipsnio dalyje pateikiama trumpa Rytų Baltijos regiono įtvirtintų gyvenviečių tyrinėjimų istorija ir ankstesnių tyrimų interpretacija. Ankstesnių tyrimų rezultatas – įtvirtintų gyvenviečių vėlyvojo žalvario ir ikiromėniškojo geležies amžiaus laikotarpio pagrindinės paplitimo teritorijos, principinės chronologijos bei pagrindinių kultūrinių ir ekonominių bruožų nustatymas.
    [Show full text]
  • MESOLITHIC and NEOLITHIC HABITATION of the EASTERN BALTIC EE-2400 Tartu, Estonia and Institute of Latvian History, 19, Turgenev
    [RADIOCARBON, VOL. 35, No. 3, 1993, P. 503-506] MESOLITHIC AND NEOLITHIC HABITATION OF THE EASTERN BALTIC ARVI LIIVA Institute of Zoology and Botany, Estonian Academy of Sciences, Vanemuise Street 21 EE-2400 Tartu, Estonia and ILZE LOZE Institute of Latvian History, 19, Turgenev Street, LV-1518 Riga, Latvia ABSTRACT. In this paper we consider the radiocarbon chronology of Mesolithic and Neolithic settlement sites in the eastern Baltic region. Dating of wood and charcoal from Estonian and Latvian sites establishes the periods (early, middle and late) within these epochs. We present 9014C dates, as yet unpublished in RADIOCARBON, produced by laboratories in Riga, Tallin, Tartu, Leningrad and Moscow. INTRODUCTION The Tartu, Vilnius and Leningrad laboratories radiocarbon dated samples from Mesolithic and Neolithic settlement sites of the eastern Baltic. Laboratories in Riga, Tallinn and Moscow also dated some samples; Tartu and Leningrad previously reported 36 dates (Vinogradov et al. 1966; Liiva, Ilves and Punning 1966; Dolukhanov 1970; Ilves, Punning and Liva 1970; Semyontsov et al. 1972; Dolukhanov et al. 1976). We have used 90 additional dates for our study. All 14C data presented here are uncorrected and uncalibrated. RADIOCARBON INVESTIGATIONS Radiocarbon investigations in the eastern Baltic have enabled us to establish an occupation history beginning with the Early Mesolithic. No samples were obtained from Late Paleolithic sites. The timing of the Early Mesolithic culture in Estonia and eastern Latvia was determined after dating seven samples from three habitation sites: Pulli in Estonia (5 samples), Zvejnieki II and Suagals in Latvia (2 samples). Occupation of the Pulli site, associated with the early phase of the Kunda culture, as are habitation sites of Latvia, is ascribed to 9600-9350 BP (Punning, Liiva and Ilves 1968; Ilves, Liiva and Punning 1974; Jaanits and Jaanits 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History of Latvia 10 500–1 800 BC at the End of the Glacial
    ENG Ancient History of Latvia 10 500–1 800 BC At the end of the Glacial Period, approximately 14 000–12 000 years ago, the territory of Latvia became free from the ice sheet. The first human settlers arrived in this tundra landscape in the Late Paleolithic (10 500–9 000 BC), 11 000–12 000 years ago, following the reindeer and keeping to the major river valleys and the shore of the Baltic Ice Lake [3]*. Their material culture reveals affinities with the Swiderian Culture of Central and Western Europe. Natural conditions in the Mesolithic (9 000–5 400 BC) changed from cool and dry to warm and wet. People settled permanently on riverbanks and lakeshores, and subsisted from hunting, fishing and gathering wild plants. These people made weapons and tools from flint, antler, bone and wood [4,5]. They belonged to the Kunda Culture, which extended across a large area of the East Baltic. The beginning of the Neolithic (5 400–1 800 BC) was marked by the introduction of pottery-making [7]. The Neolithic also witnessed the beginnings of animal husbandry and agriculture. In the Early Neolithic (5 400–4 100 BC), the Narva Culture developed locally on the bases of the Kunda Culture. In the Middle Neolithic (4 100–2 900 BC), the representatives of the Pit-Comb Ware Culture arrived in the territory of Latvia from the north-east, regarded as the ancestors of the Finnic peoples [10–12]. In this period, amber was also extensively worked. In western Latvia there was the Sārnate Culture [9] while in the eastern Latvia – the Piestiņa Culture [13] that continued the tradition of the Narva Culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Mesolithic Settlements from the Area of Mazovia (Kokry Industry)
    Tomasz Boroń · małgorzaTa Winiarska-kaBacińska LATE MESOLITHIC SETTLEMENTS FROM THE AREA OF MAZOVIA (KOKRY INDUSTRY) spaTial-funcTional camp inTerpreTaTions The presented archaeological material originates from the excavations at the site of Wieliszew (woj. ma zo- wieckie / PL) conducted in the late 1950s and the 1960s by Hanna Więckowska from the instytut Historii kultury materialnej (presently instytut archeologii i etnologii polskiej akademii nauk). This site is located on the left bank of the river narew, exactly at the place where it joins the Vistula (fig. 1a). out of the material unearthed at that time, two fint assemblages from trenches XVi and XViic were selected (Więckowska 1965; Boroń / Winiarska-kabacińska 2016). They represent the kokry industry. The name has been derived from a range located in the Wieliszew district (Więckowska 1969, 79. 94). The discussed industry has been distinguished mainly on the basis of the fnds from mazovia (central poland). its main features are: a signifcant prevalence of scrapers over endscrapers, the occurrence of splintered pieces, and the lack of variety of the microlithic types, limited basically to the trapezes (Więckowska 1985, 102). it is also worth to note the low share in perforators, borers, truncated pieces, and burins. These obser- vations confrm that starting from the early mesolithic the amount of the latter ones diminishes continually (kobusiewicz 1970, 117). The tools from trenches XVi and XViic are strongly miniaturised and according to some researchers, this is a characteristic feature of the kokry industry. our studies focused on determining whether these tools bear traces of usage and, if so, how they were used.
    [Show full text]
  • Katarzyna Pyżewicz, Kamil Serwatka, Damian Stefański DOI: 10.26485/AAL/2017/63/1
    Acta Archaeologica Lodziensia nr 63 Katarzyna Pyżewicz, Kamil Serwatka, Damian Stefański DOI: 10.26485/AAL/2017/63/1 Spatial, funCTIOnAL AnD comparative AnALySIS Of A late palaeolithIC SWIDERIAn CultuRE SETTLEMEnT at KRAKóW-BIEżAnóW SITE 15 ABSTRAKT Niniejszy artykuł jest studium poświęconym organizacji przestrzennej osadnictwa kultury świ- derskiej na stanowisku w Krakowie-Bieżanowie 15. W trakcie szerokopłaszczyznowych badań ratowniczych (2004-2008), pozyskano tam liczne materiały krzemienne wiązane z tą kulturą. Pochodzą one zarówno z obiektów, jak np. niewielkiej krzemienicy (KB-15/1 – obiekt 1), czy skupiska materiału (obiekt 2 i 3), jak również ze znacz- nej części przebadanej partii stanowiska, gdzie zostały podjęte jako znaleziska pojedyncze. Analiza planigraficzna podstawowych grup narzędziowych, tj. liściaków (ostrzy) świderskich, drapaczy i rylców, pokazała, że ich rozrzut wokół obiektów archeologicznych nie jest przypadkowy i wskazuje on na zróżnicowanie w zakresie funkcjonalnej organizacji przestrzeni przez ludność kultury świderskiej na stanowisku. Niniejsze badanie miało odpowiedzieć na pytanie dotyczące właściwości tego zróżnicowania. W tym celu przebadano mikroskopowo część dostępnego ma- teriału. Chociaż stan zachowania zabytków mocno ograniczył możliwość przeprowadzenie analizy traseologicznej, to poczyniono szereg cennych obserwacji. Szczególnie interesujące wnioski dotyczyły liściaków i drapaczy. Dodatkowo, liściaki świderskie, jako miarodajna kategoria zabytków związanych z kulturą świderską, zostały przeanalizowane
    [Show full text]
  • Kristjan Sander & Aivar Kriiska NEW ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA AND
    Fennoscandia archaeologica XXXV (2018) Kristjan Sander & Aivar Kriiska NEW ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA AND PALEOLANDSCAPE RECONSTRUCTIONS OF THE BASIN OF AN EARLY AND MIDDLE HOLOCENE LAKE NEAR KUNDA, NORTH-EASTERN ESTONIA Abstract The settlement site of Kunda Lammasmägi and its surroundings have been studied extensively since the 19th century. Nevertheless, a number of questions on the nature of the settlement and its surrounding environment remain unanswered. In this paper, we will present paleolandscape recon- structions based on geology, palynology, micro- and macrofossil analysis and radiocarbon datings published by various researchers. We will also include recent LiDAR data, results of the fieldwork carried out by the authors at Kunda Lammasmägi and along the paleolake shoreline, as well as the results of the analysis of archaeological material accumulated from 1933 to 2016 with an emphasis on lithic finds and pottery. Recent fieldwork, digital elevation modelling and typo-chronological review of the finds have clarified issues, such as the extent of stratigraphical mixing, association between the settlement stages and the paleolake development, and the human activity in other parts of the paleolake depression. Three distinct phases can be observed in the development of environmental conditions of the Kunda depression: 1) until the beginning of the Atlantic pollen assemblage zone, Lammasmägi existed as an island in the southern part of a postglacial lake; 2) during the first half of the Atlantic, the water level dropped, a remnant lake was left in the northern part, and Lammasmägi existed as a seasonal island or higher place in the marsh; 3) by the begin- ning of the second half of the Atlantic, the remnant lake was partly overgrown and Lammasmägi was surrounded by dry land.
    [Show full text]
  • 1453208266.Pdf
    Russian Journal of Biological Research, 2015, Vol. (6), Is. 4 Copyright © 2015 by Academic Publishing House Researcher Published in the Russian Federation Russian Journal of Biological Research Has been issued since 2014. ISSN: 2409-4536 E-ISSN: 2413-7413 Vol. 6, Is. 4, pp. 227-240, 2015 DOI: 10.13187/ejbr.2015.6.227 www.ejournal23.com UDC On Localization of Ancient Bearers of Y-DNA R1a Haplotype in Eastern Europe Neolithic Cultures 1 Alexander S. Semenov 2 Vladimir V. Bulat 1 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Russian Federation Bio Pharm Cluster «Northern», Department of Innovative Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology (IPB) 2 Deep Dive Research Group, Russian Federation Abstract The work considers the problems of genetics, archeology, and anthropology connected with problem of localization of R1a* Y-DNA haplotype bearers in Meso- and Neolithic Pre-Corded Ware archaeologic sites. Based on the analysis of findings of 2014-2015 years (described in other works) this paper proposes a hypothesis that the areas of Comb Ware cultures of Eastern Europe could be the possible area of archaic Y-DNA R1a1 subclades spread. The ancient R1a1 Y-haplotype (M198-, M459+) bearers could be possibly accompanied with those with J2b Y-DNA haplotype. As for pre-Mesolitic time, the situation remains unclear as more Eastern and more Southern localizations of R1a* and R1a1* bearers are possible according to modern data. Keywords: Y-DNA haplotype, R1a1, J2b, Mesolithic, Yuzniy Oleni Ostrov, Khvalynsk, Serteya, paleogenetics, paleolinguistics, subclades. Introduction The interest in the origin and early localization of carriers of Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1 is serious, since this Y-DNA subclade is inherent to the significant percentage of the population of Central and Eastern Europe, India, Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic History of Northern Europe
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/113241; this version posted March 3, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. The Genetic History of Northern Europe Alissa Mittnik1,2*, Chuan-Chao Wang1, Saskia Pfrengle2, Mantas Daubaras3, Gunita Zarina4, Fredrik Hallgren5, Raili Allmäe6, Valery Khartanovich7, Vyacheslav Moiseyev7, Anja Furtwängler2, Aida Andrades Valtueña1, Michal Feldman1, Christos Economou8, Markku Oinonen9, Andrejs Vasks4, Mari Tõrv10, Oleg Balanovsky11,12, David Reich13,14,15, Rimantas Jankauskas16, Wolfgang Haak1,17, Stephan Schiffels1 and Johannes Krause1,2* *corresponding author: [email protected], [email protected] 1Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany 2Institute for Archaeological Sciences, Archaeo- and Palaeogenetics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany 3Department of Archaeology, Lithuanian Institute of History, Vilnius 4Institute of Latvian History, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia 5The Cultural Heritage Foundation, Västerås, Sweden 6|Archaeological Research Collection, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia 7Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia 8Archaeological Research Laboratory, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden 9Finnish Museum of Natural History - LUOMUS, University of Helsinki, Finland 10Independent
    [Show full text]
  • Gudaitiene Sapolaite Ezerinska
    THE LAST SWIDERIANS IN LITHUANIA GABRIELĖ GUDAITIENĖ, JUSTINA ŠAPOLAITĖ, The Last Swiderians The Last Swiderians in Lithuania ŽILVINAS EŽERINSKIS Abstract This paper focuses on an issue that was, and still remains, unsolved in Baltic Stone Age archaeology: the dating of the very end of the period of Swiderian culture. This time, the questions raised are what cultural unit (or units) should be considered as the last Swiderians, and who were the last tanged point users in general? In addition, the latest AMS 14C dates from the GABRIELĖ GUDAITIENĖ, GUDAITIENĖ, GABRIELĖ ŠAPOLAITĖ, JUSTINA EŽERINSKIS ŽILVINAS Mesolithic Pabartoniai 1 site in central Lithuania are taken into consideration within the archaeological context recorded dur- ing excavations in 2014–2016. Several archaeological objects – flint artefacts, knapped sandstone pebbles, burnt material and a few archaeological features – that were eliminated from the Late Mesolithic horizon and hypothetically interpreted as pre- existant, are discussed as maybe belonging to the Late Swiderian archaeological horizon. This data suggests some alternative insights into what was previously declared about the chronology of the last Swiderians: it brings up the very slight possibility that this culture could have lasted as long as up to the early Boreal period, or around 400 years later than the formerly agreed dating. However, this study should be seen as the very first step in the discussion, which still needs argumentation and other case studies to be carried out until the hypothesis is proven. Key words: Swiderian culture, Mesolithic, Preboreal, Boreal, AMS radiocarbon dating, Lithuania. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15181/ab.v26i0.2021 Introduction was considered when interpreting analogous data from elsewhere in the Baltic region.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information
    Supplementary Information The Genetic History of Northern Europe Alissa Mittnik1,2, Chuan-Chao Wang1, Saskia Pfrengle2, Mantas Daubaras3, Gunita Zarina4, Fredrik Hallgren5, Raili Allmäe6, Valery Khartanovich7, Vyacheslav Moiseyev7, Anja Furtwängler2, Aida Andrades Valtueña1, Michal Feldman1, Christos Economou8, Markku Oinonen9, Andrejs Vasks4, Mari Tõrv10, Oleg Balanovsky11,12, David Reich13,14,15, Rimantas Jankauskas16, Wolfgang Haak1,17, Stephan Schiffels1 and Johannes Krause1,2 1Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany 2Institute for Archaeological Sciences, Archaeo- and Palaeogenetics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany 3Department of Archaeology, Lithuanian Institute of History, Vilnius 4Institute of Latvian History, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia 5The Cultural Heritage Foundation, Västerås, Sweden 6|Archaeological Research Collection, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia 7Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia 8Archaeological Research Laboratory, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden 9Finnish Museum of Natural History - LUOMUS, University of Helsinki, Finland 10Independent researcher, Estonia 11Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow, Russia 12Vavilov Institute for General Genetics, Moscow, Russia 13Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA 14Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA 15Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
    [Show full text]
  • The Prehistory of Polish Pomerania
    THE BALTIC POCKET LIBRARY THE PREHISTORY OF POLISH POMERANIA BY DR. JÓZEF KOSTRZEWSKI PROFESSOR OF PREHISTORY*^!' THE UNIVERSITY OF POZNAŃ 1 9 TORUŃ (POLAND)3_6 PUBLISHED BY THE BALTIC INSTITUTE J. S. BERGSON, 4, VERNON PLACE, LONDON W. C. 1 THE PREHISTORY OF POLISH POMERANIA r Double face urn and bronze cauldron of provincial workmanship, found at Topolno, district of Świecie. I 4 Ki THE BALTIC POCKET LIBRARY THE PREHISTORY OF POLISH POMERANIA BY DR. JÓZEF KOSTRZEWSKI PROFESSOR OF PREHISTORY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF POZNAŃ 19 TORUŃ (POLAND) 3 6 PUBLISHED BY THE BALTIC INSTITUTE J. S. BERGSON, 4, VERNON PLACE, LONDON W. C, 1 Printed in Poland by “Rolnicza Drukarnia i Księgarnia Nakładowa Poznań, Sew. Mielżyńskiego 24 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1. THE STONE AGE......................................................... 9 The Final Palaeolithic Period, p. 9. The Mesolithic Age, p. 10. The Neolithic Age, p. 13; Ribbon Ware, p. 14; Funnel Cup Culture, p. 16; Eastern Globular Amphora Culture, p. 19; The Corded Pottery Culture, p. 21; The Rzucewo Culture, p. 24; The Comb Pottery, p. 29; Finds of Copper, p. 30. CHAPTER 2. THE BRONZE AGE....................................................32 The Early Bronze Age, p. 32; The Iwno Culture, p. 33; Hoards, p. 34. The Second Bronze Age Period, p. 36. The Third Bronze Age Period, p. 37; The Cassubian Local Group, p. 38; The Chełmno Local Group, p. 40; Affinities of the Lusatian Culture, p. 41. The Fourth Bronze Age Period, p. 43; The Cassubian Sub-Group, p. 43,; The Chełmno Sub-Groun, p. 46. The Fifth (Latest) Bronze Age Period, p. 49; The Cassubian Sub-Group, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Ain Ghazal Excavation Reports 2: Evolution of Lithic Economies
    bibliotheca neolithica Asiae meridionalis et occidentalis Editors-in-Chief: Hans Georg K. Gebel Gary O. Rollefson Editors of the ‘Ain Ghazal Excavation Reports Gary O. Rollefson Zeidan A. Kafafi Alan H. Simmons Cooperating Institutions for Publishing this Volume: Faculty of Archaeology and Anthropology, Yarmouk University, Irbid Department of Antiquities, Amman Financial Support for Printing this Volume: Whitman College, Walla Walla ex oriente e.V., Berlin Managing Editor of this Volume, Layout: Hans Georg K. Gebel ‘Ain Ghazal Excavation Reports Volume 2 Evolution of Lithic Economies in the Levantine Neolithic: Development and Demise of Naviform Core Technology, as Seen at ‘Ain Ghazal Leslie A. Quintero bibliotheca neolithica Asiae meridionalis et occidentalis & Monograph of the Faculty of Archaeology and Anthropology (Yarmouk University) ex oriente, Berlin (2010) address of the bibliotheca neolithica Asiae meridionalis et occidentalis: ex oriente e.V., c/o Institut für Vorderasiatische Altertumskunde, Freie Universität Berlin, Hüttenweg 7, 14195 Berlin, Germany Copyright: ex oriente e.V., Berlin (2010) Printed in Germany by dbusiness GmbH, Berlin ISSN 1616-9360 (bibliotheca neolithica Asiae meridionalis et occidentalis) ISBN 978-3-9811888-4-4 Cover design by Yusuf Zu'bi, Yarmouk University (supported by G. Rollefson, Z. Kafafi, and S. Schaefer). Cover photo of ‘Ain Ghazal MPPNB blade cache by author, of ‘Ain Ghazal Central Field 1993 by Yusuf Zu'bi. ‘AIN GHAZAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH PROJECT Joint Enterprise of the Institute of Archaeology
    [Show full text]