Ain Ghazal Excavation Reports 2: Evolution of Lithic Economies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ain Ghazal Excavation Reports 2: Evolution of Lithic Economies bibliotheca neolithica Asiae meridionalis et occidentalis Editors-in-Chief: Hans Georg K. Gebel Gary O. Rollefson Editors of the ‘Ain Ghazal Excavation Reports Gary O. Rollefson Zeidan A. Kafafi Alan H. Simmons Cooperating Institutions for Publishing this Volume: Faculty of Archaeology and Anthropology, Yarmouk University, Irbid Department of Antiquities, Amman Financial Support for Printing this Volume: Whitman College, Walla Walla ex oriente e.V., Berlin Managing Editor of this Volume, Layout: Hans Georg K. Gebel ‘Ain Ghazal Excavation Reports Volume 2 Evolution of Lithic Economies in the Levantine Neolithic: Development and Demise of Naviform Core Technology, as Seen at ‘Ain Ghazal Leslie A. Quintero bibliotheca neolithica Asiae meridionalis et occidentalis & Monograph of the Faculty of Archaeology and Anthropology (Yarmouk University) ex oriente, Berlin (2010) address of the bibliotheca neolithica Asiae meridionalis et occidentalis: ex oriente e.V., c/o Institut für Vorderasiatische Altertumskunde, Freie Universität Berlin, Hüttenweg 7, 14195 Berlin, Germany Copyright: ex oriente e.V., Berlin (2010) Printed in Germany by dbusiness GmbH, Berlin ISSN 1616-9360 (bibliotheca neolithica Asiae meridionalis et occidentalis) ISBN 978-3-9811888-4-4 Cover design by Yusuf Zu'bi, Yarmouk University (supported by G. Rollefson, Z. Kafafi, and S. Schaefer). Cover photo of ‘Ain Ghazal MPPNB blade cache by author, of ‘Ain Ghazal Central Field 1993 by Yusuf Zu'bi. ‘AIN GHAZAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH PROJECT Joint Enterprise of the Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology at Yarmouk University at Irbid, the ‘Ain Ghazal Research Institute, Wembach (1992-1998), the Department of Antiquities of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, supported by Department of Antiquities, Amman Yarmouk University, Irbid Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada American Center for Oriental Research, Amman National Endowment for Humanities (1988-1989, 1999, 2007) National Geographic Society (1983-1985, 1988-1989) ‘Ain Ghazal Research Institute, Wembach (1992-1998) United States Agency for International Development (1993) Cobb Institute of Archaeology, Mississippi State University (1983-1984, 1988) Agnese Haury Foundation (1988, 1996) Friends of ‘Ain Ghazal (1995, 1998-1999) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF PLATES viii LIST OF TABLES x EDITORS’ FOREWORD xi PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xiii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Neolithic Economies 3 Naviform Core-and-Blade Technology 4 Neolithic ‘Ain Ghazal 6 Chapter 2. CULTURAL BACKGROUND 11 Epipaleolithic/Natufian 11 Pre-Pottery Neolithic 13 Pottery Neolithic 15 Chapter 3. ANALYTICAL METHODS AND THEIR HISTORY 17 Historical Framework of Near Eastern Research 18 New Directions in Lithic Research 20 Technological Systems Analysis 21 Behavioral Background 22 Replication-Based Analogies 23 Replicative Analyses and Chaînes Opératoires 24 Functional Studies 25 Technological Studies 26 Economic Organization: Problems and Potential 27 Summary Remarks on Near Eastern Methodologies 28 iii Chapter 4. RESEARCH OVERVIEW, IMPLEMENTATION, AND DATABASE 31 Introduction 31 Economic Organization 32 Socioeconomic Conditions of Craft Specialization 33 Initial Concepts 33 Levantine Framework 33 Current Concepts 34 Technological Evidence of Craft Specialization 35 Organization of Lithic Economies 36 Resource Procurement 37 Organization of Core-and-Blank Production 37 Production Technology 37 Resource-Selection Strategies 37 Core-and-Blank Production 38 Tool Production 38 Research Procedures 38 Procedure 1: Resource-Acquisition Analysis 38 Resource Survey 39 Laboratory Analysis 39 Procedure 2: Technological Analysis of Core-and-Blank Production 40 Procedure 3: Analysis of Lithic Debitage Loci 40 Data Base 41 Chapter 5. ‘AIN GHAZAL FLINT RESOURCES AND THE WADI 43 HUWEIJIR FLINT MINES Archaeological Background 43 Pottery Neolithic 43 Pre-Pottery Neolithic 44 ‘Ain Ghazal Data 45 Geological Field Research 46 Geological Environment 46 Field Survey 46 Wadi Huweijir Mines 47 Seam Mines 47 Mining Activities 54 Quarry Terraces 54 Discussion 55 iv Laboratory Experiments 56 Ultraviolet Fluorescence Analysis 56 Heat-Treatment Experiments 61 ‘Ain Ghazal Heat-Treatment Study 62 Summary 64 Discussion 64 Chapter 6. NAVIFORM CORE TECHNOLOGY 67 Background 67 Aspects of Technology 67 Technological History and Analytical Issues 68 Replicative Analysis 69 ‘Ain Ghazal Database and the Experimental Process 69 Resource Selection and Core Production 70 Replication Strategies 72 Core Production 74 Blade Production 79 Core Maintenance 92 Termination of Production Process 96 Naviform Core-and-Blade Technology: Constraints and Benefits 96 Chapter 7. DEBITAGE ANALYSIS 99 Analytical Procedures and Rational 99 Core Data: Core Typologies and Their Technological Implications 100 Naviform Blade Cores 101 Non-Naviform Blade Cores 109 Flake Cores 109 Debitage Loci: Chipping Floors, Workshops, and Debris Dumps 111 Background 111 Analytical Procedures and Rationale 116 Production Loci 116 Primary and Secondary Deposits 116 Activity Areas and Workshops 118 Application 119 Debitage Sample 120 Pre-Pottery Neolithic: MPPNB 120 Pre-Pottery Neolithic: LPPNB 130 Pre-Pottery Neolithic: PPNC 132 Yarmoukian Pottery Neolithic 134 v Blades, Flakes, and Tool Production 134 Summary 142 Chapter 8. SUMMARY EVALUATION 145 Organization of Lithic Technologies at ‘Ain Ghazal 145 Naviform-Core Technology and Specialized Production 145 Accessing Resources that are Difficult or Costly to Acquire 145 Technical Difficulty in Production and High Level of 146 Production Skill Standardization of the Core-and-Blade Production and 147 Process and Error-Reduction Strategies Standardization of Products 147 Production Efficiency 148 Workshops or Specialized Work Areas 148 Standard Production Tool Kits 148 Summary 149 PPNB Technological Dualism 149 PPNC and Yarmoukian Generalized Technologies 151 The Evolution of Lithic Economies 152 Epipaleolithic: An Economic View 152 Pre-Pottery Neolithic: Specialized and Generalized Economies 153 Pre-Pottery Neolithic C: Collapse of Economic Dualism 155 Concluding Thoughts 155 BIBLIOGRAPHY 157 vi LIST OF FIGURES Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Map of the Levant showing major sites discussed in the text 2 1.2 ‘Ain Ghazal maps 8 Chapter 5. ‘AIN GHAZAL FLINT RESOURCES AND THE WADI HUWEIJIR FLINT MINES 5.1 PPNB flint mines located in wadis Huweijir and Zarqa, and their position relative to the site of ‘Ain Ghazal 48 5.2 Schematic representation of cross section of wadi showing typical mining exposures 56 Chapter 6. NAVIFORM CORE TECHNOLOGY 6.1 Blade-production debitage. Schematic view 87 6.2 Schematic view of idealized representations of core-production and core-maintenance debitage 91 Chapter 7. DEBITAGE ANALYSIS 7.1 MPPNB naviform blade core reduced as a flake core 102 vii LIST OF PLATES Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Views of ‘Ain Ghazal 7 Chapter 5. ‘AIN GHAZAL FLINT RESOURCES AND THE WADI HUWEIJIR FLINT MINES 5.1 View of the lower course of Wadi Huweijir just above its confluence with Wadi Zarqa, looking southwest 49 5.2 View of flint seam mines on the north side of Wadi Huweijir 50 5.3 Horizontal seams of flint nodules in limestone matrix 51 5.4 Views of seam mines 52 5.5 Excavated cavities formed by extraction of flint nodule 53 5.6 Linear features in Wadi Huweijir that appear to be collapsed seam mines 57 5.7 Archaeological mining debris 58 5.8 Quarried terraces on north side of Wadi Huweijir 59 5.9 Tested and partially excavated flint nodules in north wall terrace features 60 Chapter 6. NAVIFORM CORE TECHNOLOGY 6.1 Refitted replication of naviform core reduction 73 6.2 MPPNB naviform cores 75 6.3 Preparation of naviform precore 76 6.4 Platform spall types: archaeological 80 6.5 Reduction series: removal of platform spalls and initial blade 81 6.6 Reduction series: replicated cores, front and back preparation 81 6.7 MPPNB naviform core and blade tools 83 6.8 Reduction series: replication of blade production 85 6.9 Reduction series: replication of core maintenance and blade production 86 6.10 Typical blade-production debitage: replications 88 6.11 Naviform core reduction: exploded view 90 6.12 Error-correction debitage and errors: “clean-up” blades and overshots 93 6.13 Lateral core-trimming elements 94 viii Chapter 7. DEBITAGE ANALYSIS 7.1 Naviform cores 103 7.2 Exhausted MPPNB naviform cores recycled as percussors 104 7.3 Face view of exhausted naviform cores from late MPPNB workshop (F14, locus 037) 105 7.4 Side view of same MPPNB cores pictured in Plate 7.3 106 7.5 LPPNB naviform cores 107 7.6 Naviform cores from PPNC and Yarmoukian contexts 108 7.7 Typical single-platform bladelet cores 108 7.8 Single-platform blade cores 110 7.9 Single-platform flake cores 112 7.10 Multi-platform flake cores 113 7.11 Discoidal flake cores 114 7.12 Overview of East Field of ‘Ain Ghazal 122 7.13 Excavation exposures of structure complexes on East Field slope, 1996 122 7.14 East Field LPPNB structures 123 7.15 MPPNB workshop debris pit 124 7.16 Two of the naviform cores from the MPPNB workshop deposit, as found 124 7.17 Workshop debitage, F14, locus 037 125 7.18 Workshop F14, locus 037, more debitage 126 7.19 Tool-production debitage and tools 128 7.20 Tool-production debitage and tools 129 7.21 MPPNB blade cache 138 7.22 MPPNB blade-cache bundle, as found beneath a plastered floor 138 7.23 Potential projectile point blanks in blade cache 139 7.24 Typical PPNB projectile points 139 7.25 Potential sickle blade blanks in blade cache 140 7.26 Typical PPNB sickle blades 140 7.27 PPNC/PN
Recommended publications
  • Shaher Rababeh, Professor, Hashemite University Former Vice President
    Shaher Rababeh, Professor, Hashemite University Former Vice President Shaher Rababeh Mobile:+962 (0)79 9055312 P.O. Box 150459, Zerqa, Jordan. Fax: +962 (0) 5 3826613 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Home Page: https://hu.edu.jo/Administratives.aspx ABOUT ARCHITECT AND PLANNER Architectural Heritage and Urban Planning; Construction Technology; Sustainable Development; Architectural Technology and Theory; Design Studio Teaching; Professional Practice; Property and the Construction Industry; Conservation of Historic Buildings. BIOGRAPHY Shaher Rababeh is a full professor of architecture and construction at the Hashemite University, Jordan. Formerly he was: the founder and the former chair of the Department of Architecture (2005-11), the founder and the director of the Department of Engineering Projects (2007- present), the vice dean of the Faculty of Engineering (2011-12), the dean of the Faculty of Engineering (Feb. 2012- Sep. 2016), the founder and the director of the Energy Center (Oct. 2017-Jan. 2020), and the vice president of the University (Sep. 2016-Nov. 2019). He received his BSc in Architectural Engineering from Yarmouk University, Jordan in 1987. From the University of Oxford, he was awarded his MSt. in Classical Architecture and DPhil in Architectural Construction Techniques and Methods of Design, in 2005. Thereafter, he has been associated with the Faculty of Engineering at the Hashemite University until now. His approach to research and management is founded in his education and the realities of working as a professional architect and consultant in Jordan for 14 years before getting the DPhil, and in the main values common to any organization: respect, team spirit, transparency and creativity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solutrean-Magdalenian Transition: a View from Iberia
    Quaternary International 272-273 (2012) 75e87 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint The SolutreaneMagdalenian transition: A view from Iberia J. Emili Aura a,*, Marc Tiffagom b, Jesús F. Jordá Pardo c, Elsa Duarte d, Javier Fernández de la Vega d, David Santamaria d, Marco de la Rasilla d, Margarita Vadillo e, Manuel Perez Ripoll e a University of Valencia, Prehistória i Arqueologia, Avda. Blasco Ibañez, 28, Valencia 46010, Spain b Museu de Prehistoria, Valencia, Spain c Laboratorio de Estudios Paleolíticos, UNED Madrid, Spain d Area de Prehistoria, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain e Dept. Prehistoria i Arqueologia, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain article info abstract Article history: The paper examines the Upper SolutreaneArchaic Magdalenian/Badegoulian succession on the base of Available online 18 May 2012 lithic and bone tool production, chrono-stratigraphic data and radiocarbon dates from the Cantabrian and Mediterranean regions of Iberia, mainly the areas of Asturias and Valencia (Spain). The discussion considers a reduced number of variables (characteristic stone tools, bone points and decoration tech- niques) and highlights the elements in common. The analysis concerning the transformation of lithic production at Cova del Parpalló provides new data for the Upper SolutreaneArchaic Magdalenian/ Badegoulian transition. Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction continuous incisions) at Badegoule and Le Placard. Nonetheless, all these elements are still characterized as Magdalenian. The techniques used for the manufacture of Solutrean stone The transition is not only defined by the shift from stone points points changed during the Last Glacial Maximum (hereafter LGM), to ones made of bone.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St
    LATE MISSISSIPPIAN CERAMIC PRODUCTION ON ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA Anna M. Semon A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Vincas P. Steponaitis C. Margaret Scarry R. P. Stephen Davis Anna Agbe-Davis John Scarry © 2019 Anna M. Semon ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Anna M. Semon: Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St. Catherines Island, Georgia (Under the direction of Vincas P. Steponaitis) This dissertation examines Late Mississippian pottery manufacturing on St. Catherines Island, Georgia. Data collected from five ceramic assemblages, three village and two mortuary sites, were used to characterize each ceramic assemblage and examine small-scale ceramic variations associated with learning and making pottery, which reflect pottery communities of practice. In addition, I examined pottery decorations to investigate social interactions at community and household levels. This dissertation is organized in six chapters. Chapter 1 provides the background, theoretical framework, and objectives of this research. Chapter 2 describes coastal Georgia’s culture history, with focus on the Mississippian period. Chapters 3 and 4 present the methods and results of this study. I use both ceramic typology and attribute analyses to explore ceramic variation. Chapter 3 provides details about the ceramic typology for each site. In addition, I examine the Mississippian surface treatments for each assemblage and identified ceramic changes between middle Irene (A.D. 1350–1450), late Irene (A.D. 1450–1580), and early Mission (A.D. 1580–1600) period.
    [Show full text]
  • TAU Archaeology the Jacob M
    TAU Archaeology The Jacob M. Alkow Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures and The Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities | Tel Aviv University Number 4 | Summer 2018 Golden Jubilee Edition 1968–2018 TAU Archaeology Newsletter of The Jacob M. Alkow Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures and The Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities Number 4 | Summer 2018 Editor: Alexandra Wrathall Graphics: Noa Evron Board: Oded Lipschits Ran Barkai Ido Koch Nirit Kedem Contact the editors and editorial board: [email protected] Discover more: Institute: archaeology.tau.ac.il Department: archaeo.tau.ac.il Cover Image: Professor Yohanan Aharoni teaching Tel Aviv University students in the field, during the 1969 season of the Tel Beer-sheba Expedition. (Courtesy of the Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University). Photo retouched by Sasha Flit and Yonatan Kedem. ISSN: 2521-0971 | EISSN: 252-098X Contents Message from the Chair of the Department and the Director of the Institute 2 Fieldwork 3 Tel Shimron, 2017 | Megan Sauter, Daniel M. Master, and Mario A.S. Martin 4 Excavation on the Western Slopes of the City of David (‘Giv’ati’), 2018 | Yuval Gadot and Yiftah Shalev 5 Exploring the Medieval Landscape of Khirbet Beit Mamzil, Jerusalem, 2018 | Omer Ze'evi, Yelena Elgart-Sharon, and Yuval Gadot 6 Central Timna Valley Excavations, 2018 | Erez Ben-Yosef and Benjamin
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Major Transitions in the Evolution of Lithic Cutting Edge Production Rates
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Identifying Major Transitions in the Evolution of Lithic Cutting Edge Production Rates Antoine Muller*, Chris Clarkson School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia * [email protected] Abstract The notion that the evolution of core reduction strategies involved increasing efficiency in cutting edge production is prevalent in narratives of hominin technological evolution. Yet a number of studies comparing two different knapping technologies have found no significant differences in edge production. Using digital analysis methods we present an investigation a11111 of raw material efficiency in eight core technologies broadly representative of the long-term evolution of lithic technology. These are bipolar, multiplatform, discoidal, biface, Levallois, prismatic blade, punch blade and pressure blade production. Raw material efficiency is assessed by the ratio of cutting edge length to original core mass. We also examine which flake attributes contribute to maximising raw material efficiency, as well as compare the dif- ference between expert and intermediate knappers in terms of cutting edge produced per OPEN ACCESS gram of core. We identify a gradual increase in raw material efficiency over the broad sweep of lithic technological evolution. The results indicate that the most significant transition in effi- Citation: Muller A, Clarkson C (2016) Identifying Major Transitions in the Evolution of Lithic Cutting ciency likely took place with the introduction of small foliate biface, Levallois and prismatic Edge Production Rates. PLoS ONE 11(12): blade knapping, all introduced in the Middle Stone Age / Middle Palaeolithic among early e0167244. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167244 Homo sapiens and Neanderthals. This suggests that no difference in raw material efficiency Editor: Roberto Macchiarelli, Universite de Poitiers, existed between these species.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Residue Analysis and the Earliest Uses of Pottery in the Ancient Middle East
    ORGANIC RESIDUE ANALYSIS AND THE EARLIEST USES OF POTTERY IN THE ANCIENT MIDDLE EAST by Michael William Gregg A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology University of Toronto © Copyright by Michael William Gregg 2009 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60970-5 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60970-5 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Flint Recycling in the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age: Evidence for Small Flakes Production by Means of Recycling at Ein-Zippori, Israel Yoni Parush 1,2, Richard W
    Flint recycling in the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age: Evidence for small flakes production by means of recycling at Ein-Zippori, Israel Yoni Parush 1,2, Richard W. Yerkes 3, Bar Efrati 1,2, Ran Barkai 1,2, Avi Gopher 1,2 1. The Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology, Tel-Aviv University, POB 39040, 69978 Tel-Aviv, Israel. Email: Parush: [email protected]; Gopher: [email protected]; Barkai: [email protected]; Efrati: [email protected] 2. Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near East Cultures, Tel-Aviv University, POB 39040, 69978 Tel- Aviv, Israel. 3. Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, U.S.A. Email: Yerkes: [email protected] Abstract: This paper presents a new techno-typological analysis of a sample of small flakes that were produced through recycling from discarded blanks at the late Pottery Neolithic and Early Bronze Age site of Ein-Zippori, Lower Galilee, Israel. This study shows that the systematic production of small flakes from previously discarded blanks was not related to a scarcity in raw materials, but rather to specific decisions concerning the types of tools needed to carry out necessary tasks. These results are supported by use-wear analysis briefly noted on here and presented in more detail in a separate paper. The results further indicate the importance of reconstructing the life history of recycled items and its influence on the composition and variability of the lithic assemblages. The results indicate that recycling was a significant lithic production trajectory during the late Pottery Neolithic and in the Early Bronze Age.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution
    On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bar-Yosef, Ofer. 1998. “On the Nature of Transitions: The Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution.” Cam. Arch. Jnl 8 (02) (October): 141. Published Version doi:10.1017/S0959774300000986 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12211496 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Cambridge Archaeological Journal 8:2 (1998), 141-63 On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution Ofer Bar-Yosef This article discusses two major revolutions in the history of humankind, namely, the Neolithic and the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic revolutions. The course of the first one is used as a general analogy to study the second, and the older one. This approach puts aside the issue of biological differences among the human fossils, and concentrates solely on the cultural and technological innovations. It also demonstrates that issues that are common- place to the study of the trajisition from foraging to cultivation and animal husbandry can be employed as an overarching model for the study of the transition from the Middle to the Upper Palaeolithic. The advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the core areas where each of these revolutions began, the ensuing dispersals and their geographic contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Mesolithic Settlements from the Area of Mazovia (Kokry Industry)
    Tomasz Boroń · małgorzaTa Winiarska-kaBacińska LATE MESOLITHIC SETTLEMENTS FROM THE AREA OF MAZOVIA (KOKRY INDUSTRY) spaTial-funcTional camp inTerpreTaTions The presented archaeological material originates from the excavations at the site of Wieliszew (woj. ma zo- wieckie / PL) conducted in the late 1950s and the 1960s by Hanna Więckowska from the instytut Historii kultury materialnej (presently instytut archeologii i etnologii polskiej akademii nauk). This site is located on the left bank of the river narew, exactly at the place where it joins the Vistula (fig. 1a). out of the material unearthed at that time, two fint assemblages from trenches XVi and XViic were selected (Więckowska 1965; Boroń / Winiarska-kabacińska 2016). They represent the kokry industry. The name has been derived from a range located in the Wieliszew district (Więckowska 1969, 79. 94). The discussed industry has been distinguished mainly on the basis of the fnds from mazovia (central poland). its main features are: a signifcant prevalence of scrapers over endscrapers, the occurrence of splintered pieces, and the lack of variety of the microlithic types, limited basically to the trapezes (Więckowska 1985, 102). it is also worth to note the low share in perforators, borers, truncated pieces, and burins. These obser- vations confrm that starting from the early mesolithic the amount of the latter ones diminishes continually (kobusiewicz 1970, 117). The tools from trenches XVi and XViic are strongly miniaturised and according to some researchers, this is a characteristic feature of the kokry industry. our studies focused on determining whether these tools bear traces of usage and, if so, how they were used.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Relationships Between Human Adaptive Responses and Ecology Via Eco-Cultural Niche Modeling William E
    Assessing relationships between human adaptive responses and ecology via eco-cultural niche modeling William E. Banks To cite this version: William E. Banks. Assessing relationships between human adaptive responses and ecology via eco- cultural niche modeling. Archaeology and Prehistory. Universite Bordeaux 1, 2013. hal-01840898 HAL Id: hal-01840898 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01840898 Submitted on 11 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Thèse d'Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches Université de Bordeaux 1 William E. BANKS UMR 5199 PACEA – De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie Assessing Relationships between Human Adaptive Responses and Ecology via Eco-Cultural Niche Modeling Soutenue le 14 novembre 2013 devant un jury composé de: Michel CRUCIFIX, Chargé de Cours à l'Université catholique de Louvain, Belgique Francesco D'ERRICO, Directeur de Recherche au CRNS, Talence Jacques JAUBERT, Professeur à l'Université de Bordeaux 1, Talence Rémy PETIT, Directeur de Recherche à l'INRA, Cestas Pierre SEPULCHRE, Chargé de Recherche au CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette Jean-Denis VIGNE, Directeur de Recherche au CNRS, Paris Table of Contents Summary of Past Research Introduction ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Networking in the Neolithic: Obsidian Sourcing at Abu Hureyra (N. Syria)
    Networking in the Neolithic: Obsidian Sourcing at Abu Hureyra (N. Syria) Tristan Carter, Deanna Aubert, Kelly Brown, and Sean Doyle1 1 Department of Anthropology, McMaster University / McMaster Archaeological XRF Laboratory [MAX Lab] (4) Results (6) Discussion and Future Directions Using strontium (Sr), and zirconium (Zr) contents, four Abu Hureyra’s consumption of both eastern and central compositional groups are distinguished (Fig. 4). Anatolian obsidian forms part of a northern Levantine PPN - PN tradition. One group’s chemical signature matches that of Göllü Dağ obidibsidian from central AliAnatolia (n=60). The largest data-set Comparable assemblages are attested at Cheikh Hassan, (n=123), matches Bingöl B in eastern Anatolia (Fig. 1). El Kowm 2, Mureybet, Qdeir 1, and Tell Kosak Shamali inter alia (Chataigner 1998). 73 artefacts have the high Zr values, and green colour of peralkaline obsidian. Elemental ratios discriminate them Next we need to move from discussing the circulation into Bingöl A (n=26), and Nemrut Dağ (n=47). of raw materials per se, and to consider their specific forms of consumption. Five artefacts match the ‘Group 3d’sourceofRenfrewet al (1966); while the location is unknown, its distribution Fig. 1. Abu Hureyra & major Anatolian obsidian sources For example, using eastern Anatolian obsidians to make suggests an origin in eastern Anatolia, or Iran (Fig.5). ‘corner thinned blades’ (Fig 3, a & j), is a distinct N. Fig. 2. Trenches D & E: Study assemblages Fig. 5. Distribution of ‘Group 3d’ products (1) Introduction and Aims Levantine / Upper Mesopotamian practice (Fig. 7). 120 Sub-Period Phase Dates Cultural Phase It is this elucidation of such closely shared practices that Located on the Middle Euphrates in N.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeolithic Continental Europe
    World Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: A Characterization edited by Dan Hicks and Alice Stevenson, Archaeopress 2013, page 216-239 10 Palaeolithic Continental Europe Alison Roberts 10.1 Introduction The collection of Palaeolithic material from Continental Europe in the Pitt Rivers Museum (PRM) is almost of equivalent size to the collection from the British Isles (see Chapter 9), but is not nearly as well known or as well published. It consists mainly of material from France that seems to have been an under-acknowledged highlight of the PRM archaeological collections for most of the 20th century. Despite the obvious care with which French Palaeolithic material was acquired by the museum, especially during the curatorship of Henry Balfour, the collection has mainly been used for teaching and display, rather than as a research resource. Due to the historic lack of work on the collection so far, this chapter presents a preliminary overview, to orient and inform future research, rather than a full account of the collections. The exact numbers of Palaeolithic objects from Europe are difficult to state with certainty due to factors such as unquantified batch registration of groups of objects in the past, and missing or incorrect cultural attributions in the documentation. However, it is estimated that there are c. 3,760 Palaeolithic objects from continental Europe in the PRM, c. 534 of which are from the founding collection of the PRM (PRMFC)(1). The majority of the material comprises c. 3,585 objects from France (Figure 10.1), with smaller collections from Belgium (c. 63 objects), Italy (c.
    [Show full text]