DOCSLIB.ORG

S/PV.8427 Kosovo 17/12/2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United Nations S/ PV.8427 Security Council Provisional Seventy-third year 8427th meeting Monday, 17 December 2018, 3 p.m. New York President: Mr. Adom ..................................... (Côte d’Ivoire) Members: Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ..................... Mrs. Cordova Soria China ......................................... Mr. Ma Zhaoxu Equatorial Guinea ............................... Mr. Edjang Nnaga Ethiopia ....................................... Mr. Amde France ........................................ Mr. Delattre Kazakhstan .................................... Mr. Umarov Kuwait ........................................ Mr. Alotaibi Netherlands .................................... Mr. Van Oosterom Peru .......................................... Mr. Meza-Cuadra Poland ........................................ Ms. Wronecka Russian Federation ............................... Mr. Nebenzia Sweden ....................................... Mr. Skoog United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .. Ms. Pierce United States of America .......................... Mr. Hunter Agenda Security Council resolutions 1160 (1998), 1199 (1998), 1203 (1998), 1239 (1999) and 1244 (1999) Letter dated 14 December 2018 from the Permanent Representative of Serbia to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/2018/1111) . This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the translation of speeches delivered in other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of a member of the delegation concerned to the Chief of the Verbatim Reporting Service, room U-0506 ([email protected]). Corrected records will be reissued electronically on the Official Document System of the United Nations (http://documents.un.org). 18-44297 (E) *1844297* S/PV.8427 Kosovo 17/12/2018 The meeting was called to order at 3.05 p.m. increase in the tariff on goods imported from Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina from 10 to 100 per cent. In Adoption of the agenda response, the mayors of the four Kosovo Serb-majority municipalities of northern Kosovo announced their The agenda was adopted. resignations and the decision of the respective municipal assemblies to cease all official communication with the Security Council resolutions 1160 (1998), 1199 Pristina authorities. The main Kosovo Serb political (1998), 1203 (1998), 1239 (1999) and 1244 (1999) party — the Serbian List — has organized daily Letter dated 14 December 2018 from the protests, centred in North Mitrovica, that have at times Permanent Representative of Serbia to the involved up to 5,000 people. United Nations addressed to the President of Belgrade, for its part, stated that Pristina had the Security Council (S/2018/1111) violated the Central European Free Trade Agreement The President (spoke in French): In accordance and stressed that it would resume its involvement in with rule 37 of the Council’s provisional rules of the European Union (EU)-facilitated dialogue only procedure, I invite the representative of Serbia to once Pristina revokes the import tax. Key international participate in this meeting. partners, including the European Union, also urged the Government of Kosovo to revoke the tax, while On behalf of the Council, I welcome His Excellency in Pristina Special Representative of the Secretary- Mr. Aleksandar Vučić, President of the Republic of General Tanin issued a statement expressing concern Serbia, and request the Protocol Officer to escort him about the potential impact of the decision on the to his seat at the Council table. population of Kosovo and on the normalization of Mr. Aleksandar Vučić, President of the Republic of relations between Belgrade and Pristina. Serbia, was escorted to a seat at the Council table. Amid the tense atmosphere, the Assembly of The President (spoke in French): In accordance Kosovo adopted on 14 December three laws, namely, with rule 39 of the Council’s provisional rules of the law on the Kosovo Security Force; the law on procedure, I invite Mr. Jean-Pierre Lacroix, Under- service in the Kosovo Security Force; and the law Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations, to on the Ministry of Defence. The laws do not change participate in this meeting. the name of the Kosovo Security Force, which would require a constitutional amendment, yet they provide In accordance with rule 39 of the Council’s for substantial changes to be implemented over a provisional rules of procedure, I invite Mr. Hashim period of time to the mandate, role and strength of the Thaçi to participate in this meeting. Kosovo Security Force. The Kosovo Government, in The Security Council will now begin its consideration a statement issued following the adoption of the laws, of the item on its agenda. underscored the right of Kosovo to have “an army; a multi-ethnic and professional force built under the I wish to draw the attention of Council members highest NATO standards”. In Belgrade, the Serbian to document S/2018/1111, which contains a letter dated authorities condemned the adoption of the laws as 14 December 2018 from the Permanent Representative an act of “political aggression” against Serbia and a of Serbia to the United Nations addressed to the violation of resolution 1244 (1999). They also called on President of the Security Council. the Kosovo Force (KFOR) not to allow the operation of I now give the floor to Mr. Lacroix. any Kosovo army on the territory of Kosovo. Mr. Lacroix: Since the Special Representative of Among international partners, the Secretary- the Secretary-General and Head of the United Nations General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) (NATO) declared that the transition of the Kosovo briefed the Security Council on 14 November (see Security Force is, in principle, a matter for Kosovo S/PV.8399), a number of developments in Kosovo have to decide upon. He nevertheless expressed regret at heightened tensions between Belgrade and Pristina. the decision of the Assembly of Kosovo, which he On 21 November, following Kosovo’s failed bid to join characterized as ill-timed and in disregard of the INTERPOL, the Government of Kosovo announced an concerns previously raised by NATO. He also stressed 2/20 18-44297 17/12/2018 Kosovo S/PV.8427 the continued commitment of NATO, through KFOR, to President Vučić: I am profoundly grateful to the a safe and secure environment in Kosovo. The European Council for convening this meeting at such short notice. External Action Service stated that the mandate of the We think that it was very important and very right to Kosovo Security Force should be changed only through do so, owing to the terribly difficult situation on the an inclusive and gradual process, in accordance with ground that has led to us face more and more difficulties Kosovo’s Constitution, and expressed the expectation in the area of Kosovo and Metohija. I have to say that of the European Union that Kosovo would continue I am very worried, concerned about and even a bit to uphold its obligations under the First Agreement of afraid of and for the future not only of my people and Principles Governing the Normalization of Relations of our country, Serbia, but of the entire region. I listened April 2013 and its security arrangements. very carefully to Under-Secretary-General Lacroix and I would like to say something different than what he The Secretary-General has noted with concern said, although I agree with many of the things that he the adoption of the laws by the Assembly of Kosovo. expressed. He underscored that resolution 1244 (1999) provides the sole legal framework for the international security First of all, I would like to tell the Council that presence, the Kosovo Force, which is entrusted with the Serbia has invested huge efforts and great endeavour responsibility of ensuring a safe and secure environment in maintaining the peace, tranquillity and stability in Kosovo and that “any restriction to the discharge of the entire region of the Western Balkans. We have by KFOR of its security responsibilities would be done everything that we could have done, refraining inconsistent with that resolution.” The Secretary- from responding to different types of provocation General has called on all parties concerned to exercise from Pristina. We have always been very restrained restraint and to refrain from actions that could raise and we do not accept the kind of phrase that has tensions and cause a further setback in the European become customary when two sides are called upon to Union-facilitated dialogue for the normalization of do something or not to do something. Serbia has done relations between Belgrade and Pristina. Special almost everything in its power to implement everything Representative Tanin issued a similar statement in that has been agreed so far. Pristina. As the Council members knows, we signed the First The recent developments in Kosovo have further Agreement of Principles Governing the Normalization deteriorated relations between Belgrade and Pristina, of Relations between Belgrade and Pristina in April which have been strained for some time, with no progress 2013. Serbia has fulfilled all of its obligations under on the EU-facilitated dialogue. We are concerned by the the Agreement. We made a lot of concessions and it risk of tensions on the ground, particularly
Recommended publications
  • Vice President Visits KFOR: VP Talks About the Importance of the National Guard and the KFOR Mission

    Vice President Visits KFOR: VP Talks About the Importance of the National Guard and the KFOR Mission

    VP Visits Polish Constitution Donating Help Kids Camp June 2009 Vol. 17, Issue 4 THE GGUARDIANUARDIANEAST Vice President Visits KFOR: VP talks about the importance of the National Guard and the KFOR mission Official magazine of Multi-National Task Force-East Aiming for Gold The Right Tune Misfits KFOR Timeline “Defeat Complacency” “Leadership Is Developmental” Brig. Gen. Keith D. Jones MNTF-E Commander Halfway there: I believe, during this edition of the Guardian East, it is absolutely appropriate to reflect on the fact that, with the advent of the month of June, we are halfway through our deployment. I’m sure that this is not only a reflection point for us here in Kosovo, but for family and friends who await our return to our respective home states. I would guess that, for most of us, the halfway mark has come fast. It certainly has for me. First, with a bit of nostalgia, it seems like yesterday we accepted our guidons and uncased colors: Task Force Med Falcon shared the uncasing of their colors in the clamshell along with members of the KOA and KOS medical community, the maneuver and aviation battalion task forces and Special Troops Battalion (STB) TOA’s uncased their colors in their respective South Town/North Town gyms and clamshells, the EOD accepted their guidon following the traditional EOD sendoff explosion (followed by a not-so-traditional snowball fight), STB’s HHC held a very dignified ceremony in the South Town Theater, following quote from FM 3-07, where it defines what it calls “the and the LMT and MP transferred guidons in appropriate and essence of Stability Operations” by stating that “time may be the dignified ceremonies.
  • The Dayton Accords and the Escalating Tensions in Kosovo

    The Dayton Accords and the Escalating Tensions in Kosovo

    Berkeley Undergraduate Journal 68 THE DAYTON ACCORDS AND THE ESCALATING TENSIONS IN KOSOVO By Christopher Carson Abstract his paper argues that the Dayton Accords, which ended the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, were the primary cause of the outbreak of violence in Kosovo in 1998. While the Accords were regarded as successful in neighboring Bosnia, the agreement failed to mention the Texisting situation in Kosovo, thus perpetuating the ethnic tensions within the region. Following the Dayton Accords, the response by the international community failed to address many concerns of the ethnically Albanian population living in Kosovo, creating a feeling of alienation from the international political scene. Finally, the Dayton Accords indirectly contributed to the collapse of the Albanian government in 1997, creating a shift in the structure of power in the region. This destabilization triggered the outbreak of war between Serbs and Albanians in Kosovo the following year. The Dayton Accords 69 I. Introduction For many years, the territory of Kosovo functioned as an autonomous region within the state of Yugoslavia. During that time, Kosovo was the only Albanian-speaking territory within Yugoslavia, having been home to a significant Albanian population since its creation. The region also had a very important meaning for the Serb community, as it was the site of the Battle of Kosovo in 1389, which defined Serbian nationalism when Serbian forces were defeated by the Ottoman Empire. In the 1980s, tensions began to arise between the two communities, initially resulting in protests against the centralized government in Belgrade and arrests of Albanian Kosovars. Under the presidency of Slobodan Milošević, these ethnic tensions intensified both in Kosovo and elsewhere in Yugoslavia.
  • The Serbian Media and the Dialogue: Has There Been an Evolution in How Serbian Media Perceive Kosovo?

    The Serbian Media and the Dialogue: Has There Been an Evolution in How Serbian Media Perceive Kosovo?

    Policy Analysis - No. 01/2016 The Serbian Media and the Dialogue: Has there been an evolution in how Serbian media perceive Kosovo? The Serbian Media and the Dialogue: Has there been an evolution in how Serbian media perceive Kosovo? ABOUT GLPS Group for Legal and Political Studies is an independent, non-partisan and non-profit public policy organization based in Prishtina, Kosovo. Our mission is to conduct credible policy research in the fields of politics, law and economics and to push forward policy solutions that address the failures and/or tackle the problems in the said policy fields. www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 2 The Serbian Media and the Dialogue: Has there been an evolution in how Serbian media perceive Kosovo? Policy Analysis No. 05/2016 The Serbian Media and the Dialogue: Has there been an evolution in how Serbian media perceive Kosovo? Lowell West* January 2016 For their contribution, we would like to thank the external peer reviewer(s) who provided excellent comments on earlier drafts of this policy product. GLPS internal staff provided very helpful inputs, edits and contributed with excellent research support. © Group for Legal and Political Studies, January, 2016 The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of Group for Legal and Political Studies donors, their staff, associates or Board(s). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any mean without the permission. Contact the administrative office of the Group for Legal and Political Studies for such requests. Group for Legal and Political Studies „Rexhep Luci‟ str.
  • Kosovo After Haradinaj

    Kosovo After Haradinaj

    KOSOVO AFTER HARADINAJ Europe Report N°163 – 26 May 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. THE RISK AND DEFLECTION OF REBELLION................................................... 2 A. MANAGEMENT OF THE HARADINAJ INDICTMENT ..................................................................2 B. SHADOW WARRIORS TEST THE WATER.................................................................................4 C. THE "WILD WEST" ON THE BRINK ........................................................................................6 D. DUKAGJINI TURNS IN ON ITSELF ...........................................................................................9 III. KOSOVO'S NEW POLITICAL CONFIGURATION.............................................. 12 A. THE SHAPE OF KOSOVO ALBANIAN POLITICS .....................................................................12 B. THE OCTOBER 2004 ELECTIONS .........................................................................................13 C. THE NETWORK CONSOLIDATES CONTROL ..........................................................................14 D. THE ECLIPSE OF THE PARTY OF WAR? ................................................................................16 E. TRANSCENDING OR DEEPENING WARTIME DIVISIONS?.......................................................20 IV. KOSOVO'S POLITICAL SYSTEM AND FINAL STATUS..................................
  • Kosovo: Background and U.S

    Kosovo: Background and U.S

    Kosovo: Background and U.S. Policy Updated March 11, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46175 SUMMARY R46175 Kosovo: Background and U.S. Policy March 11, 2021 Kosovo, a country in the Western Balkans with a predominantly Albanian-speaking population, declared independence from Serbia in 2008, less than a decade after a brief but lethal war. It has Sarah E. Garding since been recognized by about 100 countries. The United States and most European Union (EU) Analyst in European Affairs member states recognize Kosovo. Serbia, Russia, China, and various other countries (including five EU member states) do not. Key issues for Kosovo include the following: New Leadership. Albin Kurti is poised to become prime minister for the second time after his left-leaning Self-Determination Party (Vetëvendosje) won a landslide victory in early parliamentary elections in February 2021. The poll was Kosovo’s second snap parliamentary election in less than two years. Once of the new parliament’s initial responsibilities is to elect the country’s next president. Acting President Vjosa Osmani, whose candidacy is backed by Vetëvendosje, is heavily favored to win. Parliament’s failure to elect a president could trigger early parliamentary elections, however. Dialogue with Serbia. The unresolved dispute between Kosovo and Serbia is one of the main threats to regional stability in the Western Balkans. Since 2011, the EU has facilitated a dialogue aimed at normalizing their relations. In July 2020, Kosovo and Serbia returned to EU-led talks after a 20-month suspension. Shortly thereafter, the two parties agreed to new measures on economic cooperation at talks hosted by the White House.
  • All Victims Matter. Reconciliation of the Balkan Faiths and Peoples: an Assessment of Recent Progress

    All Victims Matter. Reconciliation of the Balkan Faiths and Peoples: an Assessment of Recent Progress

    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 40 Issue 10 Article 2 12-2020 All Victims Matter. Reconciliation of the Balkan Faiths and Peoples: An Assessment of Recent Progress Vjekoslav Perica University of Rijeka, Croatia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Perica, Vjekoslav (2020) "All Victims Matter. Reconciliation of the Balkan Faiths and Peoples: An Assessment of Recent Progress," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 40 : Iss. 10 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol40/iss10/2 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALL VICTIMS MATTER RECONCILIATION OF BALKAN FAITHS AND PEOPLES: AN ASSESSMENT OF RECENT PROGRESS By Vjekoslav Perica Vjekoslav Perica is a Croatian-American historian, author of, among other things, Balkan Idols: Religion and Nationalism in Yugoslav States (Oxford University Press, 2002; Belgrade, 2006). His most recent publication is “Serbian Jerusalem: Inventing a Holy Land in Europe’s Periphery, 1982- 2019,” Chapter IX, in Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, eds. When Politics Are Sacralized: Comparative Perspectives on Religious Claims and Nationalism (Cambridge University Press, 2020). Perica holds a Ph.D. in history from the University of Minnesota Twin Cities, USA. In the 1970s in former Yugoslavia he was a basketball player, and before the war, a jurist and journalist until coming to America in 1991.
  • Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For

    Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For

    LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO: 1999-2001 LESSONS LEARNED FOR JUDGE ADVOCATES Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) The Judge Advocate General’s School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia CENTER FOR LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS (CLAMO) Director COL David E. Graham Deputy Director LTC Stuart W. Risch Director, Domestic Operational Law (vacant) Director, Training & Support CPT Alton L. (Larry) Gwaltney, III Marine Representative Maj Cody M. Weston, USMC Advanced Operational Law Studies Fellows MAJ Keith E. Puls MAJ Daniel G. Jordan Automation Technician Mr. Ben R. Morgan Training Centers LTC Richard M. Whitaker Battle Command Training Program LTC James W. Herring Battle Command Training Program MAJ Phillip W. Jussell Battle Command Training Program CPT Michael L. Roberts Combat Maneuver Training Center MAJ Michael P. Ryan Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Peter R. Hayden Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Mark D. Matthews Joint Readiness Training Center SFC Michael A. Pascua Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Jonathan Howard National Training Center CPT Charles J. Kovats National Training Center Contact the Center The Center’s mission is to examine legal issues that arise during all phases of military operations and to devise training and resource strategies for addressing those issues. It seeks to fulfill this mission in five ways. First, it is the central repository within The Judge Advocate General's Corps for all-source data, information, memoranda, after-action materials and lessons learned pertaining to legal support to operations, foreign and domestic. Second, it supports judge advocates by analyzing all data and information, developing lessons learned across all military legal disciplines, and by disseminating these lessons learned and other operational information to the Army, Marine Corps, and Joint communities through publications, instruction, training, and databases accessible to operational forces, world-wide.
  • On 16 September 2004 the European Parliament Adopted A

    On 16 September 2004 the European Parliament Adopted A

    BACKGROUND - on 16 September 2004 the European Parliament adopted a resolution on harassment of minorities in Vojvodina where it, amongst others, "expressed deep concern at the repeated breaches of human rights in the province" and asked the delegation for relations with the countries of South East Europe to be authorised to conduct a fact-finding mission in that province; - the fact-finding mission took place from 28 to 31 January 2005 and the report was made available on 2 March 2005 (original in FR) and 31 March 2005 (translations); its main results were: 1. Vojvodina should remain a model region, because its multiculturalism goes hand in hand with a fairly harmonious cohabitation between the different nationalities living there. In order to preserve this, it is vital to combat attacks of any kind on the roots of each and every one of the region's traditional cultures. 2. It is essential that the province's multi-ethnic character be preserved, particularly in view of any future EU accession of Serbia and Montenegro, since the place of Voïvodina would then be a very special one, both geo-strategically and sociologically. For that reason, all existing forms of rapprochement need to actively supported (Interreg III/a, cooperation with European border regions). 3. The inter-ethnic incidents which plagued Voïvodina over a period of thirteen months appear to be the result of a conjunction of unfavourable factors, which was itself the outcome both of older situations and of more recent, and even highly specific circumstances: changes to the province's demographic make-up, influx of refugees in very difficult economic circumstances, the March 2004 Kosovo crisis, and tense election campaigns.
  • S-1959-0076-0006-00015.Pdf

    S-1959-0076-0006-00015.Pdf

    (�) - LE SECRETAIRE GENERAL Le 27 fevrier 2012 Monsieur le President, En application de la resolution 1244 (1999) du Conseil de securite, j'ai l'honneur de porter a votre connaissance la lettre ci-jointe, datee du 20 fevrier 2012, du Secretaire general delegue de !'Organisation du traite de l' Atlantique Nord, Son Excellence M. Alexander Vershbow, transmettant le rapport sur la presence intemationale de securite au Kosovo durant la periode du 1 er juillet au 30 septembre 2011. Je vous serais reconnaissant de bien vouloir porter la presente lettre a !'attention des membres du Conseil de securite. Je vous prie d'agreer, Monsieur le President, les assurances de rna tres haute consideration. Son Excellence Monsieur Kodjo Menan President du Conseil de securite New York United Nations Nations Unies Executive Office of the Secretary-General Cabinet du Secr8taire general To: Mr. Nambiar, Please find attached for your approval and SG's signature, a letter addressed to the President of the Security Council, transmitting the report.on the KFOR operations, covering the period from 1 July to 30 September 2011. Cc:. KWS 12-01809 '-.ACTION W '� (u.>· CONFIDENTIAL COPY \j� W(\ Please find attached, for the Secretary-General's signature, a draft letter addressed to the President of the Security Council conveying the report on the KFOR operations, covering the period from 1 July to 30 September 201 1. erve Ladsous 23 February 20 12 DEPUTY SECRETARY GENERAL SECRETAIRE GENERAL D.E.LEGUE AMBASSADOR - AMBASSADEUR AlEXANDERVERSHBOW DSG(2012)0067 20 February 2012 Your Excellency, In accordance with paragraph 20 of UN Security Council Resolution 1244, I attach a report on KFOR operations covering the period 1 July to 30 September 2011.
  • LETTER to G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS

    LETTER to G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS

    LETTER TO G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS We write to call for urgent action to address the global education emergency triggered by Covid-19. With over 1 billion children still out of school because of the lockdown, there is now a real and present danger that the public health crisis will create a COVID generation who lose out on schooling and whose opportunities are permanently damaged. While the more fortunate have had access to alternatives, the world’s poorest children have been locked out of learning, denied internet access, and with the loss of free school meals - once a lifeline for 300 million boys and girls – hunger has grown. An immediate concern, as we bring the lockdown to an end, is the fate of an estimated 30 million children who according to UNESCO may never return to school. For these, the world’s least advantaged children, education is often the only escape from poverty - a route that is in danger of closing. Many of these children are adolescent girls for whom being in school is the best defence against forced marriage and the best hope for a life of expanded opportunity. Many more are young children who risk being forced into exploitative and dangerous labour. And because education is linked to progress in virtually every area of human development – from child survival to maternal health, gender equality, job creation and inclusive economic growth – the education emergency will undermine the prospects for achieving all our 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and potentially set back progress on gender equity by years.
  • BULLETIN of CASE LAW Volume I January – June 2016

    BULLETIN of CASE LAW Volume I January – June 2016

    BULLETIN OF CASE LAW Volume I January – June 2016 BULLETIN OF CASE LAW 2 Publisher: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo Editorial Board: Mrs Arta Rama-Hajrizi, President of the Constitutional Court, Prof Dr. Ivan Cukalovic, Vice-President of the Constitutional Court, Mr. Almiro Rodrigues, Judge of the Constitutional Court, Prof. Dr. Snezhana Botusharova, Judge of the Constitutional Court, Mr. Milot Vokshi, Secretary General of the Constitutional Court, Legal Office, Constitutional Court; Contributors: Dr. Karl Weber, Project Manager, GIZ Mrs. Pranvera Ejupi- Hajzeraj, Project Coordinator, GIZ Mr. Selim Selimi, Legal Expert Novus Consulting © 2016 Constitutional Court of Kosovo Copyright: No part of this edition may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written approval of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo (hereinafter: the Constitutional Court), unless such copying is expressly permitted by the relevant copyright law. Disclaimer: According to Article 116.4 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, the decisions of the Constitutional Court are published in the Official Gazette of the Republic, which is the primary source for the decisions of the Constitutional Court. This Bulletin does not replace the primary source for the decisions of the Constitutional Court. In case of conflicts or inconsistencies between the decisions published in this Bulletin and the decisions published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Kosovo, the latter shall prevail. The purpose of the summary of the decisions is to provide a general factual and legal overview of the cases and a brief summary of the decisions of the Constitutional Court.
  • Propaganda Made-To-Measure: Dimensions of Risk and Resilience in the Western Balkans

    Propaganda Made-To-Measure: Dimensions of Risk and Resilience in the Western Balkans

    ASYMMETRIC THREATS PROGRAMME A Study of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia PROPAGANDA MADE-TO-MEASURE: DIMENSIONS OF RISK AND RESILIENCE IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Rufin Zamfir (editor) Funded by: A project by I Bucharest, Romania May, 2019 The report can be accessed at www.global-focus.eu or ordered at [email protected] +40-721259205 26, Hristo Botev bvd, et. 4, ap. 9 Bucharest, Sector 3 GlobalFocus Center is an independent international studies think-tank which produces in-depth research and high quality analysis on foreign policy, security, European affairs, good governance and development. It functions as a platform for cooperation and dialogue among individual experts, NGOs, think-tanks and public institutions from Romania and foreign partners. The Asymmetric Threats programme focuses on strategic communications, terrorism and radicalization, cyber security and hybrid war. DISCLAIMER The views expressed belong to the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the GlobalFocus Center. GlobalFocus Center reserves all rights for the present publication. Parts thereof can only be reproduced or quoted with full attribution to the GlobalFocus Center and mention of publication title and authors' names. Full reproduction is only permitted upon obtaining prior written approval from the GlobalFocus Center. OiiOpinions expressed in thispublica tion donot necessarilyrepresent those of the BlkBalkan Trust for Democracy, the German Marshall Fund of the United States, or its partners. Argument and Methodological Explanation (by Rufin Zamfir) pg. 1 Albania (by Agon Maliqi) pg. 7 Society pg. 9 Economy pg. 16 Politics pg. 21 Foreign Policy and Security pg. 26 Bosnia and Herzegovina (by Dimitar Bechev) pg.