Submission: M5 Corridor Upgrade

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Submission: M5 Corridor Upgrade SUBMISSION: M5 CORRIDOR UPGRADE March 2010 Infrastructure Partnerships Australia is SUBMISSION: a national forum, comprising public M5 CORRIDOR UPGRADE and private sector CEO Members, advocating the public policy interests of Australia’s infrastructure industry. FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: LARRY MCGRATH MANAGER, POLICY INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERSHIPS AUSTRALIA Level 8, 8-10 Loftus Street, Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box R1804, Royal Exchange NSW 1225 P | 02 9240 2056 E | [email protected] 2 SUBMISSION: M5 CORRIDOR UPGRADE CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 5 1.1 – INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERSHIPS AUSTRALIA .......................................................... 5 1.2 – BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 5 2. THE M5 UPGRADE ....................................................................................................... 7 2.1 BACKGROUND TO THE UPGRADE................................................................................. 7 2.2 – THE CONTINUED NEED FOR ROADS.......................................................................... 7 2.2.1 – Growth of the Freight Task............................................................................. 8 2.2.2 – Passenger and Population Growth............................................................... 10 2.3 – M5 WIDENING ....................................................................................................... 10 2.4 – M5 EAST DUPLICATION.......................................................................................... 11 2.5 – M5 EASTERN SURFACE LINK.................................................................................. 12 2.6 – THE NEED FOR TOLLING REFORM .......................................................................... 12 3. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 14 3 SUBMISSION: M5 CORRIDOR UPGRADE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The NSW Government continues to undertake community and industry consultation with a view to finalising approval for this project as soon as possible, recognising the critical nature of the corridor upgrade to alleviate congestion and provide for future freight and passenger growth. 2. The NSW Government immediately prioritises the widening of the M5 South West Motorway in partnership with the private sector. 3. The NSW Government allocates funding for the construction of the M5 East duplication, bringing it into a five year timeframe. 4. Further consideration is given to the implementation of a network tolling regime for the Sydney Orbital Network, in line with the model proposed in IPA’s recent paper, Urban Transport Challenge: Driving Reform on Sydney’s Roads, to improve demand management and drive new investment in transport infrastructure. This should also investigate a ‘corridor’ network tolling approach for the M5 South West, M5 East and Eastern Distributor corridor. 5. Urgent progress is now also required for Sydney’s M4 East, and the F3 to Sydney Orbital, and it would be prudent for the NSW Government to begin obtaining planning approval for these missing links as well as the M5 Corridor. 4 SUBMISSION: M5 CORRIDOR UPGRADE 1. Introduction 1.1 – Infrastructure Partnerships Australia Infrastructure Partnerships Australia (IPA) is the nation’s peak infrastructure organisation. Our Membership is comprised of Australia’s most senior business leaders and public sector executives from across the infrastructure sector. IPA is the only industry body which brings together the public and private sectors in a spirit of partnership, to build Australia together. Infrastructure is the lifeblood of the national economy. It is the key to how Australia does business, how we compete in the global economy and how we sustain the quality of life of a growing population. IPA’s mission is to develop and articulate the best public policy solutions needed to deliver the assets and services that will secure Australia’s productivity and prosperity. IPA is committed to ensure that governments retain all procurement options for the delivery of infrastructure. We believe that procurement models must be selected case by case, with a guiding principle of sustainably delivering better value, better quality infrastructure. 1.2 – Background New South Wales is Australia’s most populous State, and the nation’s financial centre. Yet progress of critical reform and development of infrastructure has been slow and ad hoc, threatening continued economic prosperity, productivity and liveability. The road network of New South Wales is one of the country’s most significant, consisting of 17,932 kilometres of State Roads, 5051 bridges and 3690 traffic signals and other traffic facilities. The Sydney Orbital Motorway Network incorporates a mix of public and privately owned and operated roadways, and a mix of tolled and untolled sections. All untolled segments are publicly owned and principally include links between the CBD and the major outer- metropolitan motorway links. These untolled links include the Gore Hill and Warringah Freeways as well as Southern Cross Drive and the M5 East, as well as the M4. Analysts recently estimated the corridor has an economic value of $22.7 billion and contributes more than $2 billion to the New South Wales economy each year. The largest road project currently under construction in Sydney is the Inner West Busway, which is critically important, but has a capital value of less than $200 million. This lack of major projects being undertaken in Sydney is not due to the road network operating optimally, but is rather the result of constrained balance sheets which have forced the stalling of urgently required new motorways. 5 SUBMISSION: M5 CORRIDOR UPGRADE New South Wales urgently requires a new, rigorous and joined-up approach to planning and procuring future infrastructure. This new planning paradigm would fully link infrastructure development and land-use planning, ensuring that it meets the needs of a growing population in a sustainable and responsible manner. Bold decisions are required around where Sydney will grow – the densities that will be required – and the infrastructure which will support this growth. The sheer level of infrastructure required means that all procurement and financing options must be on the table to deliver the next generation of economic and social infrastructure. In spite of a disappointing history of variable, changing transport priorities, it is in the national interest that New South Wales addresses its infrastructure shortfalls. Infrastructure Partnerships Australia is therefore pleased to be able to make the following comments on the M5 Corridor Upgrade. 6 SUBMISSION: M5 CORRIDOR UPGRADE 2. The M5 Upgrade 2.1 Background to the Upgrade The M5 Corridor is a critical component of the Sydney Orbital Motorway, yet it is currently not operating to optimal performance due to a lack of capacity in the road estate. The Corridor as described consists of the privately owned and operated M5 South West Motorway and the publicly owned M5 East Freeway. Since the opening of the M5 South West Motorway in 1992, traffic numbers have continuously risen to the point where widening of the motorway is now the only course of action to reduce congestion, improve traffic times and reduce emissions. Similarly, the M5 East has been the subject of sustained congestion since the time of opening, due to the tunnel being designed only having two lanes in each direction, which is clearly insufficient. Between 2006-07 and 2007-08, average speeds on the M5 Corridor in the AM peak declined from 40km/h to 34km/h. In the PM peak, all major corridors in Sydney recorded an increase in average travel speeds except for the M5 Corridor, further heightening the need for this road to have additional capacity. Since then, traffic across all corridors has experienced improved travel times due to general improvements to the network, however speeds remain unacceptably low. Any upgrade of the M5 Corridor is likely to attract significant private sector interest and investment, and there is the potential for the corridor upgrade to be undertaken with only minor costs to the State Government. 2.2 – The Continued Need for Roads The argument that new roads are not required and that all funds should be directed to public transport ignores a number of important issues: 1. The future freight growth in New South Wales is predicted to be extremely significant, and while rail will inevitably play a greater role than it currently does, semi-trailers and light commercial vehicles will always be needed to undertake ‘last mile’ distribution; 2. Public transport cannot meet the demands of every passenger trip, and will always account for only a small portion of trips which are not ‘journey to work’; 3. The population in Sydney is set to grow dramatically over the next several decades, and Sydney is expected to house at least 7 million people by 2050; 4. While peak oil and a growing concern and awareness over carbon emissions will inevitably present challenges to travel, it is short-sighted to consider that these challenges will alleviate the need for roads; and 5. One of the most important modes of public transport – buses – as well as taxis, operate on the road network and depend on an effective and efficient road system. 7 SUBMISSION: M5 CORRIDOR UPGRADE There will always
Recommended publications
  • Northconnex: Subsurface Stratum Acquisition
    Proceedings of the 21st Association of Public Authority Surveyors Conference (APAS2016) Leura, New South Wales, Australia, 4-6 April 2016 NorthConnex: Subsurface Stratum Acquisition Kit Panya Roads and Maritime Services [email protected] ABSTRACT NorthConnex is a proposed 9 km tunnel motorway designed to link the M1 Pacific Motorway in Wahroonga to the Hills M2 Motorway in Pennant Hills. The tunnel is part of the NSW Government’s State Infrastructure Strategy forming an essential link in the Sydney Orbital Network and expected to cost $3 billion. In January 2015, NorthConnex received official project approval by the NSW Government. The earliest access date required for tunnel construction was July 2015. The NorthConnex project team engaged the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) Cadastral Survey Unit for the stratum acquisition of approximately 900 lots. The acquisition was predominantly subsurface, but also included surface land, strata title, and community title acquisition. Between the project approval date and the tunnel access requirements, we had a timeframe of two months to acquire the first 80 lots in the initial stage. This paper outlines how the RMS Cadastral Survey Unit was able to respond, using a plan production and lodgement strategy unique to previous motorways. With Land and Property Information (LPI), we developed the Subsurface Stratum Definition Strategy to allow for the compilation of boundaries for subsurface acquisition plans. Once the strategy was in place, the extent of acquisition was determined from analysis of spatial data and the tunnel model. Compiled plan production, and occasionally field surveys, could then take place to complete the acquisition process.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Review of the Westconnex Proposal: Final Report
    Strategic Review of the WestConnex Proposal Final Report City of Sydney February 2015 140511-Final Report_150409 This report has been prepared for City of Sydney. SGS Economics and Planning has taken all due care in the preparation of this report. However, SGS and its associated consultants are not liable to any person or entity for any damage or loss that has occurred, or may occur, in relation to that person or entity taking or not taking action in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. SGS Economics and Planning Pty Ltd ACN 007 437 729 www.sgsep.com.au Offices in Canberra, Hobart, Melbourne and Sydney 140511-Final Report_150409 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 THE ECONOMIC AND TRANSPORT CONTEXT 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Recent employment growth 5 2.1 Historic population growth and distribution 7 2.1 Transport movements over time 8 2.2 Planning response to date 13 2.3 Significant future infrastructure 14 2.4 Key observations 14 3 ABOUT WESTCONNEX 16 3.1 Introduction 16 3.2 Project history 16 Original route (2012) 16 Updated WestConnex Route (2013) 18 Updated WestConnex Route (2014) 19 3.3 WestConnex Policy Alignment 21 3.4 Summary 23 4 STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT OF WESTCONNEX 24 4.1 Introduction 24 4.2 Strong population growth in Western Sydney with employment growth in Sydney’s East 24 Origin-destination evidence 24 Journey to work – to Sydney CBD 25 Journey to work – to Global Economic Corridor (GEC) 27 Journey to work – to Eastern Sydney 28 Journey to work – from Eastern Sydney 29 Employment type 30 Corridor growth 31 4.3 Urban renewal along Parramatta Road 32 4.4 The economic stimulus of WestConnex 34 4.5 The cost, benefits and risks of WestConnex 35 NSW Auditor-General Review (2014) 36 4.6 Summary of findings 37 5 STRATEGIC ALTERNATIVES TO WESTCONNEX 39 5.1 Introduction 39 5.2 Strategic alternatives 40 West Metro 40 Road Pricing 41 Wider Public Transport Investments 42 Other considerations 43 6 CONCLUDING REMARKS 44 APPENDIX 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 – Strategic Context and Project Need
    Chapter 4 – Strategic context and project need 4 Strategic context and project need 4.1 Current issues with the road network 4.1.1 Traffic congestion across Greater Sydney Traffic growth is forecast across NSW and will include around one million extra road users in Sydney within the next decade and nearly twice the freight movements by 2031. Congestion across metropolitan Sydney is estimated to cost up to $6.1 billion per annum, rising to $12.6 billion by 2030 if nothing is done1. Travel by road is the dominant transport mode in Sydney. Even with high growth in rail freight and public transport, road travel is predicted to continue to be the most dominant travel choice for at least the next 20 years2. Traffic congestion impacts communities and businesses by: • Affecting Sydney’s large and significant freight, service and business operations • Reducing the reliability of, and accessibility to, public transport • Constraining the movement of pedestrians and cyclists • Reducing amenity for nearby residents, pedestrians, cyclists and sensitive land uses (educational and health facilities). 4.1.2 Missing regional motorway link In Sydney’s South District (which includes the Canterbury-Bankstown, Georges River and Sutherland LGAs), over 50 per cent of journeys are undertaken by car. There is currently no motorway between the existing M1 Princes Motorway south of Waterfall and the Sydney motorway network. All local and through traffic, including heavy vehicle traffic, is currently required to use the arterial road network to travel between Waterfall and Sydney, principally the A1 Princes Highway, the A3 King Georges Road and / or the A6 Heathcote Road / New Illawarra Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Transport Challenge: Driving Reform on Sydney's Roads
    Urban Transport Challenge: DRIVING REFORM ON SYDNEY’S ROADS Infrastructure Partnerships Australia 8th Floor 8-10 Loftus Street Sydney NSW 2000 T +61 2 9240 2050 F +61 2 9240 2055 www.infrastructure.org.au For more information please contact: Brendan Lyon Executive Director Infrastructure Partnerships Australia PO Box R 1804, Royal Exchange, Sydney NSW 1225 T +61 2 9240 2050 E [email protected] Peter Colacino National Manager - Policy Infrastructure Partnerships Australia PO Box R 1804, Royal Exchange, Sydney NSW 1225 T +61 2 9240 2050 E [email protected] I II Contents Executive Summary V Recommendations VII 1 Introduction 1 2 Sydney’s Road Network 3 2.1 Sydney’s Changing Road Network 3 2.2 The Unfinished Network – the ‘Missing Links’ 9 3 The Case for Change 11 3.1 Drivers of Demand 11 3.2 The Cost of Congestion 15 3.3 So, is the Current System Broken? 21 3.4 Why Hasn’t it Been Fixed? 22 3.5 How Can the Road System be Fixed 24 4 The Use of Tolls to Optimise Utilisation 27 4.1 Achieving Operational Harmonisation 27 4.2 The Process for Toll Setting in Sydney 27 4.3 How Can the Tolling Regime be More Efficient? 29 4.4 Use of Network Tolling to Promote New Investment 32 5 A New Model for Tolling 33 5.1 Models for Tolling 33 5.2 Types of Variable Road Toll 35 III 6 Principles for Introducing Network Tolling 39 6.1 The Relevance of the Road Hierarchy 39 6.2 Principles of Traffic Flow & Optimising Asset Use 39 6.3 Reducing User Costs & Responses to Road Pricing 41 6.4 Price Elasticity of Demand 42 6.5 Creating
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing Is Caring: a Road Towards a Green, Global and Connected Sydney? a Case Study About the Roles of Business Models in Sustainability Transitions
    Eindhoven University of Technology MASTER Sharing is caring: a road towards a green, global and connected Sydney? a case study about the roles of business models in sustainability transitions Meijer, L.J. Award date: 2016 Link to publication Disclaimer This document contains a student thesis (bachelor's or master's), as authored by a student at Eindhoven University of Technology. Student theses are made available in the TU/e repository upon obtaining the required degree. The grade received is not published on the document as presented in the repository. The required complexity or quality of research of student theses may vary by program, and the required minimum study period may vary in duration. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain Eindhoven, February 2016 Sharing is Caring: A road towards a green, global and connected Sydney? - A case study about the roles of business models in sustainability transitions. by L.L.J. Meijer Identity number 0736537 In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Innovation Sciences Supervisors: Dr. F. (Frank) Schipper Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • NRMA 2017-18 NSW Budget Submissions
    2017-18 Budget Submission PREPARED FOR THE NSW GOVERNMENT MAY 2017 About the NRMA Better road and transport infrastructure has been a core focus of the NRMA since 1920 when our founders lobbied for improvements to the condition of Parramatta Road in Sydney. Independent advocacy was the foundation activity of the organisation and remains critical to who we are as we approach our first centenary. From humble beginnings, the NRMA has grown to represent over 2.4 million Australians principally from NSW and the ACT. The NRMA also provides motoring, mobility and tourism services to our Members and the community. Today, the NRMA works with policy makers and industry leaders to advocate for increased investment in road infrastructure and transport solutions to make mobility safer, provide access for all and to deliver sustainable communities. By working together with all levels of government to deliver integrated transport options we can give motorists a real choice about how they get around. The NRMA believes that integrated transport networks, including efficient roads, high-quality public transport and improved facilities for cyclists and pedestrians, are essential to solve the challenge of growing congestion and provide for the future growth of our communities. Comments and Queries Ms Carlita Warren Senior Manager – Public Policy & Research NRMA PO Box 1026, Strathfield NSW 2135 T: +61 2 9276 7268 E: [email protected] 1 Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney's Road Network
    Sydney’s road network: plans and prospects Briefing Paper No 8/2015 by Andrew Haylen RELATED PUBLICATIONS Population housing and transport indicators for NSW. Statistical Indicators 04/2011 by Talina Drabsch Cycling and Transport Policy in NSW. Briefing Paper 08/2010 by Daniel Montoya Road Congestion Charging. e-brief 03/2008 by Stewart Smith Transport Problems Facing Large Cities. Briefing Paper 06/2008 by Tom Edwards and Stewart Smith ISSN 1325-5142 ISBN 978-0-7313-1935-0 June 2015 © 2015 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior consent from the Manager, NSW Parliamentary Research Service, other than by Members of the New South Wales Parliament in the course of their official duties. Sydney’s road network: plans and prospects by Andrew Haylen NSW PARLIAMENTARY RESEARCH SERVICE Gareth Griffith (BSc (Econ) (Hons), LLB (Hons), PhD), Manager, Politics & Government/Law .......................................... (02) 9230 2356 Daniel Montoya (BEnvSc (Hons), PhD), Senior Research Officer, Environment/Planning ......................... (02) 9230 2003 Lenny Roth (BCom, LLB), Senior Research Officer, Law ....................................................... (02) 9230 2768 Christopher Angus (BA(Media&Comm), LLM(Juris Doctor)), Research Officer, Law .................................................................. (02) 9230 2906 Tom Gotsis (BA, LLB, Dip Ed, Grad Dip Soc Sci) Research Officer, Law .................................................................. (02) 9230 3085 Andrew Haylen (BResEc (Hons)), Research Officer, Public Policy/Statistical Indicators .................. (02) 9230 2484 John Wilkinson (MA, PhD), Research Officer, Economics ...................................................... (02) 9230 2006 Should Members or their staff require further information about this publication please contact the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Transurban-Westconnex Date Received: 23 May 2021
    Submission No 33 INQUIRY INTO ROAD TOLLING REGIMES Organisation: Transurban-WestConnex Date Received: 23 May 2021 NSW Legislative Council Inquiry into Road Tolling Regimes Portfolio Committee No 6 Transport and Customer Service 23 May 2021 Portfolio Committee No 6 Transport and Customer Service—May 2021 01 Supporting NSW economy >$13B $35.8B invested into Sydney’s in economic benefits motorway network by over 30 years1 Transurban and partners since 2013 Value for customers2 Up to Approximately 56 minutes 60% 40% 75% 290 <$10 travel-time savings on afternoon increase in reduction in of toll road users incidents managed average weekly peak westbound M4 travel-time crashes on believe toll roads per week on our consumer savings on M5 East provide a more network customer spend M5 East direct route What Sydneysiders are saying about toll roads The incident response crew even helped us change It took me 14 minutes from Wattle Street our tyre, right before a rainstorm hit. It was the end Haberfield to Cumberland Highway of their shift and they went over and above to make Greystanes. Never thought I would see sure we were safe. this in my lifetime. NorthConnex customer M4 customer 1. Benefits of toll roads accelerated delivery by the private sector. Economic Contribution of Sydney’s Toll Roads. KPMG, May 2021 2. Survey conducted by JWS Research in April 2021 of 1,000 residents in Greater Metropolitan Sydney NSW Legislative Council Inquiry into Road Tolling Regimes 40,000 300 people involved in $350M Western Sydney WestConnex project into operating
    [Show full text]
  • The New M5 Project Overview Westconnex Stage 2: the New M5 Project Overview Contents
    WestConnex The New M5 Project Overview WestConnex Stage 2: The New M5 Project Overview Contents Ministerial introductions ������������������������������������������������������������������ 2 1 WestConnex overview 1�1 The Transport challenge .............................................................................4 1�2 Planning context �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������5 1�3 WestConnex scope ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������6 1�4 Key benefits ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������7 2 The New M5 2�1 Project need ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������9 2�2 Scope Overview ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������10 2�3 Main tunnels.......................................................................................12 2�4 St Peters Interchange ������������������������������������������������������������������������������14 2�5 King Georges Road Interchange ���������������������������������������������������������������������16 2�6 Sydney Gateway ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������17 3 Key issues 3�1 Traffic and transport �������������������������������������������������������������������������������18 3�2 Environment ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������19 3�3 Air quality ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • TTF NSW Long Term Transport Master Plan 2012
    SUBMISSION TO THE NSW LONG TERM TRANSPORT MASTER PLAN Tourism & Transport Forum Tourism & Transport Forum (TTF) represents the public policy interests of more than 200 of Australia’s leading organisations in the tourism, aviation, transport and infrastructure sectors as well as related consultancies and government agencies. TTF’s Passenger Transport Panel is Australia’s only multi-modal policy think tank, providing oversight of TTF’s transport research and advocacy. This submission details the key priorities of TTF’s membership for consideration in the NSW Long Term Master Plan. For further information please contact: Trent Zimmerman | National Manager, Transport | Tourism & Transport Forum (TTF) P: (02) 9240 2000 | E: [email protected] | www.ttf.org.au Contents INTRODUCTION 5 1. Transport in NSW 5 2. Objectives of the Master Plan 6 a. Setting targets to meet growth in NSW 6 b. Working with the Commonwealth government 7 c. A sustainable approach to urban growth 7 d. A multi-modal approach to transport planning 8 3. Delivering the Master Plan 9 Summary of recommendations 11 DELIVERING THE MASTER PLAN 11 SYDNEY TRANSPORT 11 REGIONAL TRANSPORT 13 THE CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE 13 Transport infrastructure priorities 14 SYDNEY TRANSPORT 15 1. Heavy Rail 15 a. CBD rail capacity 15 b. Sectorisation 16 c. Town Hall and Wynyard improvements 16 d. Enhancing capacity on the Eastern Suburbs Line 16 e. Rail signalling 17 f. Future expansion 17 g. High speed rail 18 2. Bus 19 a. CBD capacity 19 b. Metrobus 21 c. Northern beaches rapid transit 22 d. Operations 22 3. Light Rail 23 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview NOVEMBER 2009
    moving goods, people and the economy Overview NOVEMBER 2009 Additional information February 2010 This document was published in November 2009 and includes a five kilometre link road from the eastern M5 tunnel exit point to the airport and industrial areas close to the airport. The road location shown in this study is not approved and has no status. Following discussions with the community the RTA has been requested to look at all options, in partnership with the community, for improving access to the airport and industrial areas close to the airport. Contents Minister’s message 2 1 The M5 corridor expansion 4 1.1 Sydney’s transport goals 4 1.2 The M5 transport corridor 5 1.3 What does the proposed expansion involve? 5 1.4 Why improve the M5 corridor? 6 2 Transport needs in the corridor 7 2.1 Port Botany and Sydney Airport 7 2.2 Development of the transport network 8 2.3 Planned growth areas 12 3 Options review 15 3.1 Options review 15 3.2 The preferred option 16 3.3 What benefits would this provide to the community? 17 4 Air quality and sustainability 18 5 Next steps 20 6 Community and stakeholder consultation 21 Cover photograph: Port Botany. Image © RTA 2009 Roads and Traffic Authority For further enquiries www.rta.nsw.gov.au | 13 22 13 M5 Motorway Fairford Road Gibson Avenue Canterbury Road Image 2009 © RTA Fairford Road industrial area 1 Tough decisions need to be made to deliver transport infrastructure projects that will provide the greatest NSW benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney's Motorways
    ABCDEFGHI JKLMNOPQRSTUVW 1 Syd ney ’s Orbital Mo torway Network 1 Westlink M7 Distance based toll 2 2 Charged in both directions based on distance travelled. M2 NO CASH – tag or pass only. Fixed toll See toll information below. Charged in both directions. NO CASH – tag or pass only from 30 January 2012 . See toll information below. 3 3 Lane Cove Tunnel Fixed toll Charged in both directions. NO CASH – tag or pass only. See toll information below. 4 4 Gore Hill Freeway No toll 5 5 Military Road E-Ramp Fixed toll See inset C – Northbound entry/southbound exit . NO CASH – tag or pass only. GREATER SYDNEY REGION See toll information below. 6 6 GOSFORD Sydney Harbour Bridge WINDSOR To Brisbane, KATOOMBA North Coast, Time of day toll Newcastle. Charged southbound only. To Blue Mountains, NO CASH – tag or pass only. Lithgow, Orange. M4 See toll information below. No toll 7 7 PENRITH Sydney Harbour Tunnel SYDNEY Time of day toll Charged southbound only. CAMDEN NO CASH – tag or pass only. See toll information below. To Canberra, To Wollongong, Melbourne. South Coast. 8 8 Cross City Tunnel Fixed toll Charged in both directions. NO CASH – tag or pass only. See toll information below. 9 9 Eastern Distributor Fixed toll Charged northbound only. Westlink M7 NO CASH – tag or pass only Distance based toll from 30 January 2012 . Charged in both directions See toll information below. 0 0 1 1 LEGEND based on distance travelled. NO CASH – tag or pass only. See toll information below. Motorwa ys Southern Cross Drive No toll Tunnels 1 1 State roads 1 1 Regional roads M5 East General Holmes Drive M5 No toll No toll Interchange 1 Fixed toll (see list below r ight Charged in both directions.
    [Show full text]