The Academy of Medical Sciences Review 2006 Fmedsci Contents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Academy of Medical Sciences Review 2006 FMedSci Contents 1 The Academy’s objectives and ambitions for medical science 2 A message from our President 4 Executive Director’s report 6 The strength of our Fellowship 8 How we work 10 Progress through partnership 12 Celebrating science 14 Advancing medical science and infl uencing policy 16 Building trust in science 18 Working in partnership with industry 20 The impact of research 22 Creating the next generation of medical scientists 24 Financial information 25 The Academy offi ce 14 16 18 20 22 The Academy’s objectives and ambitions for medical science The Academy of Medical Sciences promotes advances in medical science and campaigns to ensure these are converted as quickly as possible into healthcare benefi ts for society. Our 850 Fellows are the UK’s leading medical scientists from hospitals and general practice, academia, industry and the public service. Our Fellows are central to all we do. The excellence of their science, their contribution to medicine and society and the diversity of their achievements are refl ected throughout this review. The Academy seeks to play a pivotal role in determining the future of medical science in the UK, and the benefi ts that society will enjoy in years to come. We champion the UK’s strengths in medical science, including the unique opportunities for research aff orded by the NHS, encourage the implementation of new ideas and solutions – often through novel partnerships, promote careers and capacity building and help to remove barriers to progress. Throughout all our work the Academy strives to demonstrate our key attributes of excellence, independence, leadership, diversity and fl exibility. Modern medicine requires a multi-disciplinary approach – both in research and in the formation of public policy. The Academy off ers an integrated and independent national resource with the expertise and authority to deal with public policy issues in healthcare in their widest scientifi c and societal contexts. As we approach our tenth anniversary we have clear goals to guide our work, and a well-researched and considered programme to reach our objectives. At the heart of our strategy for the next fi ve years are these objectives: 1. To encourage the pursuit of internationally competitive medical science and the translation of that knowledge, and its associated technologies, from the laboratory bench to the delivery of healthcare. 2. To infl uence the development and implementation of national policy in matters of medical science and healthcare. 3. To engage with the public to build confi dence in the practice of medical research and to address public concerns. 4. To attract and develop the brightest individuals to careers in biomedical science. 5. To contribute to developments and improvements in global health. THE ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES REVIEW 2006 1 A message from our President As my term of offi ce draws to a close I refl ect on how much has changed during Professor Sir Keith Peters the Academy’s short life. I have no doubt that UK science in general, and medical FRS PMedSci science in particular, is now healthier than it was a decade ago. In the wake of John Bell’s report Strengthening Clinical Research, the creation of the UKCRC and the Walport report1 on clinical academic careers are major gains for our community. There is now a general recognition by government of the strategic importance of medical science to the UK, as a contributor to the health of our citizens and others, especially in the developing world, and as key to the success of our health-related industries, notably pharma, biotechnology and medical equipment. The Academy’s focus on translating medical science into clinical benefi t puts us at centre stage of national policy debates. The Academy welcomed the review of UK health research funding undertaken by Sir David Cooksey and supported the underlying principle of creating a holistic UK health research and development system with the appropriate leadership, governance, resources and culture. No other country enjoys the outstanding opportunity for clinical research represented by the NHS which, if its potential is realised, off ers an unparalleled advantage for UK plc. However this optimism must be guarded. The shift towards the delivery of healthcare by the private sector, with no duty to support teaching and research, represents a risk that may deny UK academic medicine this major competitive advantage. The Academy is in good shape. We have a small but outstanding team at 10 Carlton House Terrace and I know that everyone who has worked with them will join me in expressing great thanks for everything they do. As President, I have had excellent support from my colleagues on the Academy’s Council. I want to express my particular appreciation to Colin Dollery, who stood down as Treasurer in 2005, and to Patrick Vallance who served as Registrar until July 2006. I hand over to John Bell with my enthusiasm for the work of the Academy undiminished. I believe we have fulfi lled the brief set out for us by the Academy’s founder President, Peter Lachmann, to become the leading voice for academic medicine in the UK. Eight years ago the Academy did not exist. It is hard now to imagine medical science without it. 1 Medically and dentally qualifi ed academic staff : Recommendations for training the researchers and educators of the future. Published by the UKCRC and MMC March 2005. 2 THE ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES REVIEW 2006 3 Executive Director’s report For the Academy of Medical Sciences, now eight years old, success has come in many guises: the number of published policy studies and their evident impact on UK national healthcare policy, the election of excellent medical scientists to the Fellowship from across the academic spectrum, the development of forceful and eff ective strategic partnerships throughout the scientifi c community and the continued expansion of the Academy’s operations, together with an enhanced reputation nationally and internationally. We – the Fellows, Offi cers, Council and staff – have worked hard to achieve this. In this document I have the pleasure of highlighting specifi c achievements and thanking the very many people who have given their time and expertise to the Academy. I would also like to thank our many generous donors and sponsors. Their commitment to the promotion of medical science for public benefi t, and their support for the work of this Academy, has been invaluable. Mrs Mary Manning Executive Director Mrs Mary Manning Public policy in medical science and Testing antibody therapies, an independent Executive Director healthcare commentary on the scientifi c issues raised by The Academy is playing an increasingly pivotal role the TGN1412 clinical trial (April 2006); and an in the formulation of policy and funding decisions international symposium, with speakers drawn that underpin academic medicine in the UK. Two from the USA, Canada, Australia and Europe years ago we took a strategic decision to broaden in June 2005 to examine the socio-economic the Fellowship in order to expand the breadth benefi ts of medical research. This resulted in the of expertise and thus we have elected lawyers, publication Medical research: assessing the benefi ts science writers, ethicists, mathematicians, industrial to society (June 2005). chemists and economists to the membership. Much of the public policy debate over the In addition we have actively sought strategic autumn and winter of 2005 was dominated by partnerships that cut across traditional disciplinary the possibility of an infl uenza pandemic. boundaries to promote and champion key policy A private meeting for Fellows with the Chief issues. The success of this strategy is evident from Medical Offi cer, Sir Liam Donaldson FMedSci, the comments of colleagues on page 10. was convened for the purpose of improving UK In the past two years, the Academy has addressed preparedness in the face of such a threat, and the a number of major policy issues with profound discussion contributed to our response to the societal implications: Safer Medicines (November House of Lords Science and Technology Select 2005), produced by experts drawn from industry Committee inquiry into ‘Pandemic Infl uenza’. and academe; Personal data for public good: using This is also the subject of a joint study with the health information in medical research (January Royal Society Pandemic infl uenza: science to policy 2005), highlighting the vital role of patient data in (November 2006). contributing to scientifi c advances in healthcare; 4 The recent formation of the All Party Parliamentary The Academy has continued to oversee and support Group on Medical Research has provided a forum for the progress of the Fellows funded by The Health sharing advice and information with MPs and Peers. Foundation, the Allgemeines Treuunternehmen The Academy’s 2005 work on the Mental Capacity Foundation and the Primary Immunodefi ciency and Human Tissue Bills illustrated the benefi ts of Association. In 2005, the non-clinical careers using Fellows to provide evidence in support of policy committee, chaired by Professor Keith Gull FRS positions and of initiating strategic collaborations FMedSci, undertook a review of non-clinical research with other organisations; in these instances the MRC, fellowships in the biomedical sciences, The Freedom Wellcome Trust, Cancer Research UK, Association of to Succeed (July 2005). The report has already made an Medical Research Charities and the Royal College of impact on the policies of major funders. Physicians. The Academy offi ce From time to time the Academy undertakes specifi c The staff , only 12 in number, bring considerable commissions from government. ‘Brain science, talent and energy to the work of the Academy. Their addiction and drugs’, was commissioned by the dedication, commitment and willingness to take Department of Health in August 2005.