DOCSLIB.ORG

Evidence on Aluminium Collection by Local Authorities Project Code

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evidence on Aluminium Collection by Local Authorities Project Code Project Name: Evidence on Aluminium Collection by Local Authorities Project Code - WR1201 Final Report April 2008 This research was commissioned and funded by Defra. The views expressed reflect the research findings and the author’s interpretation. The inclusion of or reference to any particular policy in this report should not be taken to imply that it has, or will be, endorsed by Defra. BeEnvironmental Ltd · Suite 213 Lomeshaye Business Village · Turner Road · Nelson · Lancashire · BB9 7DR · 01282 618135 · www.beenvironmental.com Quality Control Job Evidence on Aluminium Collection by Local Authorities Client Defra Date April 2008 Report Title Evidence on Aluminium Collection by Local Authorities (Project Code: WR1201) Report status Final Author Dr Jane Beasley Director Reviewed by Elaine Lockley Director Client Contact Nick Blakey, Waste Evidence Branch, Defra Details Be Environmental Suite 213 Lomeshaye Business Village Turner Road, Nelson Lancashire, BB9 7DR Phone 01282 618135 Fax 01282 611416 [email protected] Disclaimer: BeEnvironmental (the trading name of BeEnvironmental Limited) has taken all reasonable care and diligence in the preparation of this report to ensure that all facts and analysis presented are as accurate as possible within the scope of the project. However no guarantee is provided in respect of the information presented, and BeEnvironmental is not responsible for decisions or actions taken on the basis of the content of this report. BeEnvironmental Ltd · Suite 213 Lomeshaye Business Village · Turner Road · Nelson · Lancashire · BB9 7DR · 01282 618135 · www.beenvironmental.com Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 6 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .......................................................................... 6 3. RESULTS & DISCUSSION ................................................................................ 7 3.1 Local Authority Classifications ................................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Collection of Aluminium ........................................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Collection Systems Used and Range of Aluminium Products Collected ............................................... 8 3.4 Reasons for Collecting Aluminium Products ........................................................................................ 14 3.5 Capacity to Collect More Aluminium .................................................................................................... 16 3.6 Ways to Improve Collection ................................................................................................................... 17 3.7 Barriers to Collection .............................................................................................................................. 20 4. DISCUSSION & SUGGESTIONS .................................................................... 23 4.1 Key Findings ............................................................................................................................................ 23 4.2 Key Issues & Suggestions ........................................................................................................................ 23 APPENDIX 1: LOCAL AUTHORITIES INTERVIEWED .......................................... 26 APPENDIX 2: DETAILS OF THE INTERVIEWS ..................................................... 27 APPENDIX 3: CODED RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONS ................................. 71 3 Executive Summary Defra is committed to taking forward work to increase levels of aluminium recycling in England. As part of this ongoing work BeEnvironmental were commissioned to undertake a research project to identify and review aluminium collection practices amongst a sample of local authorities, considering opportunities and barriers to increasing capture of aluminium. Forty authorities were selected from across England to take part in telephone interviews; this included 20 authorities identified as collecting aluminium (indicated by their WasteDataFlow returns), and 20 authorities who appeared to not be collecting aluminium (no returns for this material had been submitted to WasteDataFlow). The purpose of these interviews was to establish the level of aluminium collection services currently available, reasons for supporting and/or promoting the collection of aluminium within the authority, whether there was the potential to collect more aluminium material and if so how this could be achieved, and any barriers which may prevent an improvement in collection volumes. The authorities interviewed were defined according to whether they were a Waste Collection Authority or Unitary authority, the type of authority they were (based on the Defra classification of urban and rural authorities), and their size (population, number of households and population density). The key findings from the telephone interviews were: 100% of respondents confirmed that they collected aluminium, regardless of whether they were making any returns for this material to WasteDataFlow; The 20 authorities that were collecting aluminium but not making any returns to WasteDataFlow, were unable to supply data because either a separate breakdown for aluminium was not available, their contractor only supplied a general percentage in relation to alumium, or aluminium tonnage was only available for mixed cans. The availability of data in relation to aluminium collection (aside from those already making WasteDataFlow returns for this material) was limited; Both commingled kerbside and kerbside sort was used to collect aluminium (60:40 ratio amongst the sample); 16 authorities claimed to collect all aluminium products at the kerbside (identified as cans, foil, food packaging and aerosols). 11 authorities were identified as collecting cans only at the kerbside. 10 authorities stated that they accepted cans and aerosols. Only 3 authorities claimed to collect only cans and foil at the kerbside; Almost three quarters supported their kerbside collection with bring bank/Household Waste Recycling Centre (HWRC) facilities (primarily mixed metals); The majority of respondents considered there was capacity to collect more. However only two authorities attempted to quantify the tonnage potential; More than two thirds stated that they collected aluminium as part of a multi-material collection service. Maximising tonnage of recyclables was also a key driver for just under half the sample; Almost two thirds stated that education and promotion were key to increasing volumes of aluminium collected. Extending the product range and implementing alternate week collection (AWC) could also increase volumes of aluminium collected according to just over a quarter of all respondents; Material Recycling Facility (MRF) limitations, collection capacity and recognition of aluminium products that can be recycled were the main barriers identified. Whilst a sample of 40 authorities can only give a general indication of trends or key issues, the study did highlight a number of areas which warrant further discussion and exploration and could feed into the ongoing work within Defra in this area. These included: the need for further quantification of the amount of aluminium currently being collected (as the survey indicated this is currently under reported); better understanding by local authorities of the quantity of aluminium available from the waste stream; targeting of both aluminium as a 4 specific waste stream, and also the range of aluminium products which can be recycled; the role of education and communication in increasing participation and capture in relation to this material stream (including further exploration of different ways to „package‟ the gains to be made from collecting and recycling aluminium); and, support in terms of addressing contractual barriers and increasing awareness of technical requirements for improved recycling. 5 1. Introduction Defra is committed to taking forward work to increase levels of aluminium recycling in England. As part of this study BeEnvironmental have been commissioned to undertake a short research project to identify why a sample of Local Authorities choose to collect some aluminium products and not others, and what they consider to be the main drivers for, or obstacles against, collecting more. 2. Research Methodology Forty local authorities were selected to take part in a telephone interview, including 10 who took part in a pilot survey to test the style of interviews and the questions used for their appropriateness in terms of generating sufficient data and information to meet the needs of the research. The purpose of these interviews was to establish the level of aluminium collection services currently available, reasons for supporting and/or promoting the collection of aluminium within the authority, whether there was the potential to collect more aluminium material and how this could be achieved, and any barriers which may prevent an improvement in collection volumes. The full sample of authorities who took part can be found in Appendix 1. The majority who took part were pre- selected1 by Defra (34), with 6 replacements being identified due to difficulties in contacting an appropriate representative or as a result of local authorities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weekly List of Planning Consultations 11.03.2021
    CONSERVATION CASES PROCESSED BY THE GARDENS TRUST 11.03.2021 This is a list of all the conservation consultations that The Gardens Trust has logged as receiving over the past week, consisting mainly, but not entirely, of planning applications. Cases in England are prefixed by ‘E’ and cases in Wales with ‘W’. When assessing this list to see which cases CGTs may wish to engage with, it should be remembered that the GT will only be looking at a very small minority. SITE COUNTY SENT BY REFERENCE GT REF DATE GR PROPOSAL RESPONSE RECEIVED AD BY E ENGLAND Ashton Court Avon North 21/P/0510/FUL www.n- E20/1806 08/03/2021 II* PLANNING APPLICATION 30/03/2021 Somerset somerset.gov.uk/lookatpl Conversion of Pavilion building, anningapplications incorporating a small extension, lobby, plant room, timber cladding and replacement doors and windows, resin play area and other associated works, to provide temporary classroom accommodation for up to two years by Cathedral Primary School to supplement lost classroom space. Upon termination of the temporary use, the proposed classrooms are proposed for use in perpetuity in connection with the established forest school and sports education at the application site. Provision of purpose-built, self- contained changing room facility and associated works. BUILDING ALTERATION [email protected] dmscanningrequests@n- somerset.gov.uk Benham Park Berkshire West 21/00196/HOUSE E20/1797 05/03/2021 II PLANNING APPLICATION 26/03/2021 Berkshire DC https://publicaccess.west Single storey orangery extension to berks.gov.uk/online- existing dwelling and formation of link applications/search.do?a Benham Gardens, Benham Park, Marsh ction=simple&searchTyp Benham, Newbury e=Application BUILDING ALTERATION [email protected] Ascot Place Berkshire Bracknell 21/00167/FUL E20/1799 05/03/2021 II* PLANNING APPLICATION 26/03/2021 Forest http://www.bracknell- Erection of new timber gates and brick forest.gov.uk/viewplanni piers, following removal of existing ngapplications timber gates.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire HEDNA Appendices
    Buckinghamshire Housing and Economic Development Needs Assessment 2016 Study Appendices December 2016 Opinion Research Services | The Strand • Swansea • SA1 1AF | 01792 535300 | www.ors.org.uk | [email protected] Opinion Research Services ▪ Atkins | Buckinghamshire HEDNA: Study Appendices December 2016 Opinion Research Services | The Strand, Swansea SA1 1AF Jonathan Lee | David Harrison | Nigel Moore enquiries: 01792 535300 · [email protected] · www.ors.org.uk Atkins | Euston Tower, 286 Euston Road NW1 3AT Richard Ainsley enquiries: 020 7121 2280 · [email protected] · www.atkinsglobal.com © Copyright December 2016 2 Opinion Research Services ▪ Atkins | Buckinghamshire HEDNA: Study Appendices December 2016 Contents Appendix A ......................................................................................................... 4 List of Property Agents Consulted .................................................................................................................. 4 Appendix B ......................................................................................................... 5 Stakeholder workshop meeting notes............................................................................................................ 5 Appendix C ......................................................................................................... 9 Site Reconnaissance ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Appendix D .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report Monday, 4 February 2019 CONTENTS
    Daily Report Monday, 4 February 2019 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 4 February 2019 and the information is correct at the time of publication (07:00 P.M., 04 February 2019). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 7 Cabinet Office: Written ATTORNEY GENERAL 7 Questions 13 Attorney General: Trade Census: Sikhs 13 Associations 7 Cybercrime 14 Crown Prosecution Service: Cybercrime: EU Countries 14 Staff 7 Interserve 14 Crown Prosecution Service: Interserve: Living Wage 15 West Midlands 7 Reducing Regulation Road Traffic Offences: Committee 15 Prosecutions 8 DEFENCE 15 BUSINESS, ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 9 Arctic: Defence 15 Climate Change Convention 9 Armed Forces: Doctors 15 Companies: National Security 9 Armed Forces: Professional Organisations 16 Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy: Army: Deployment 16 Brexit 10 Army: Officers 16 Energy: Subsidies 10 Chinook Helicopters: Innovation and Science 11 Accidents 17 Insolvency 11 Ecuador: Military Aid 17 Iron and Steel 12 European Fighter Aircraft: Safety Measures 17 Telecommunications: National Security 12 General Electric: Rugby 18 CABINET OFFICE 13 HMS Mersey: English Channel 18 Cabinet Office: Trade Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft: Associations 13 Safety Measures 18 Ministry of Defence: Brexit 19 Ministry of Defence: Public Free School Meals: Newcastle Expenditure 19 Upon Tyne Central 36 Royal Tank
    [Show full text]
  • WYCOMBE DISTRICT COUNCIL Chief Executives / Strategic Management Board (SMB)
    WYCOMBE DISTRICT COUNCIL Chief Executives / Strategic Management Board (SMB) Acting Chief Executive PA Manager/ Personal Personal Assistant to Assistant to the Chief Executive John East Leader and Cabinet [email protected] PA to Heads of Service Interim Corporate Director (Growth and R egeneration) John East Head of Head of Head of Head of Housing, Head of Interim Head of Major Projects Democratic, Finance HR, ICT and Environment Planning Regeneration and Legal and and Facilities and Community and and Estates Policy Services Commercial Management Services Sustainability Investment Executive Catherine David John Nigel Penelope Peter Charles Wright Whitehead Skinner McMillan Dicker Tollitt Brocklehurst catherine.whitehead@ david.skinner@ john.mcmillan@ nigel.dicker@ penelope.tollitt@ peter.wright@ charles.brocklehurst@ wycombe.gov.uk wycombe.gov.uk wycombe.gov.uk wycombe.gov.uk wycombe.gov.uk wycombe.gov.uk wycombe.gov.uk WYCOMBE DISTRICT COUNCIL Democratic, Legal and Policy Services Head of Democratic, Personal Assistant to Head of Democratic, Legal and Legal and Policy Services Policy Services and Catherine Whitehead Head of Finance and Commercial [email protected] Communications District Lawyer Democratic and and Services Improvement Manager Legal Services Manager Manager Catherine Jenny Ian Spalton Caprio Hunt [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Communications Property Electoral Services/ Data and Feedback Planning Land Charges Management Contracts and Litigation
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Sampson Toovey and Katherine Shrimpton of Amersham
    DESCENDANTS OF SAMPSON TOOVEY AND KATHERINE SHRIMPTON OF AMERSHAM January 2017, revised August 2017 1 PREFACE This research was undertaken at the request of the Curator of Amersham Museum, Emily Toettcher, who wanted information about the Toovey family members who had lived in the building that now houses the museum. It was very soon apparent that much investigation had already been carried out. The trigger- factor was probably the death of Ronald Frank Toovey on 14 August 1980 in Wycombe Hospital. He was the last survivor of the four children of Frederick Samson Toovey and Sarah Ann Clare. He was unmarried, childless and intestate and, although his solicitors twice attended to try to get a Will drawn, it was too late. The solicitors commissioned a genealogist to act as heir hunter and eventually heirs were identified and the estate distributed. This seems to have generated interest in their ancestry among the descendants of Ronald Frank’s grandfather Henry Toovey (1822-1910). At that time there was considerable interest also in exploring the capabilities of computers for storing and analysing genealogical data. The Toovey family featured in an article in Computers in Genealogy in March 1993 1. In 1995 Richard Boyles wrote Toovey’s in Amersham, My Family History and kindly presented a copy to Amersham Museum. While carrying out this research he became aware of Dr DW Jopling who two years later would publish The Descendants of Toovey of Watlington, born ca 1540. A copy of this, accompanied by a roll pedigree, is in the Library of the Society of Genealogists in London.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No. 2) Order 2004 Made - - - - 6th December 2004 Laid before Parliament 10th December 2004 Coming into force - - 31st December 2004 The First Secretary of State, having received a report from the Audit Commission(a) produced under section 99(1) of the Local Government Act 2003(b), in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 99(4) of that Act, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and application 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No.2) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 31st December 2004. (2) This Order applies in relation to English local authorities(c). Categorisation report 2. The English local authorities, to which the report of the Audit Commission dated 8th November 2004 relates, are, by this Order, categorised in accordance with their categorisation in that report. Excellent authorities 3. The local authorities listed in Schedule 1 to this Order are categorised as excellent. Good authorities 4. The local authorities listed in Schedule 2 to this Order are categorised as good. Fair authorities 5. The local authorities listed in Schedule 3 to this Order are categorised as fair. (a) For the definition of “the Audit Commission”, see section 99(7) of the Local Government Act 2003. (b) 2003 c.26. The report of the Audit Commission consists of a letter from the Chief Executive of the Audit Commission to the Minister for Local and Regional Government dated 8th November 2004 with the attached list of local authorities categorised by the Audit Commission as of that date.
    [Show full text]
  • Town and Parish Councils in Aylesbury, Chiltern, South Bucks and Wycombe District Council Areas
    Town and Parish Councils in Aylesbury, Chiltern, South Bucks and Wycombe District Council areas. Dear Town or Parish Council, Creation of Parish Charter You will no doubt be aware that contrary to published expectations there was no announcement from DCLG about a reorganisation of local government in Buckinghamshire in March. We have now been informed that, in the light of the General Election, the current government will make no decision in relation to the unitary question. There will need to be a formal consideration of the submissions that have been made by the new government. Whilst we are disappointed that this Government has not yet announced support for our proposals, we remain confident that a new Government will recognise the merits of the District Council proposal and create two new unitaries in Buckinghamshire. In the meantime you will be aware that the County Council has launched an online survey for anyone to indicate their views and express support for their preferred unitary option. Obviously we welcome your support in completing the survey in favour of two unitaries and the District proposal but recognise that surveys are not everyone’s cup of tea and it is very much up to you. The link is below if you would like to do so. http://futurebucks.co.uk/yourviews/ In the meantime we are keen to ensure that we do not lose momentum in taking forward some of the ideas in our proposals which we feel do not require a decision from government. In particular we suggested that a Town and Parish Charter would enable us to develop an understanding with parishes about how we want to work together moving forward.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RURAL ECONOMY of NORTH EAST of ENGLAND M Whitby Et Al
    THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND M Whitby et al Centre for Rural Economy Research Report THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST ENGLAND Martin Whitby, Alan Townsend1 Matthew Gorton and David Parsisson With additional contributions by Mike Coombes2, David Charles2 and Paul Benneworth2 Edited by Philip Lowe December 1999 1 Department of Geography, University of Durham 2 Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope of the Study 1 1.2 The Regional Context 3 1.3 The Shape of the Report 8 2. THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE REGION 2.1 Land 9 2.2 Water Resources 11 2.3 Environment and Heritage 11 3. THE RURAL WORKFORCE 3.1 Long Term Trends in Employment 13 3.2 Recent Employment Trends 15 3.3 The Pattern of Labour Supply 18 3.4 Aggregate Output per Head 23 4 SOCIAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL DYNAMICS 4.1 Distribution of Employment by Gender and Employment Status 25 4.2 Differential Trends in the Remoter Areas and the Coalfield Districts 28 4.3 Commuting Patterns in the North East 29 5 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE 5.1 Formation and Turnover of Firms 39 5.2 Inward investment 44 5.3 Business Development and Support 46 5.4 Developing infrastructure 49 5.5 Skills Gaps 53 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 55 References Appendices 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The scope of the study This report is on the rural economy of the North East of England1. It seeks to establish the major trends in rural employment and the pattern of labour supply.
    [Show full text]
  • 3139 TDC Core Strat 10.07 Aw
    Tynedale Local Development Framework CORE STRATEGY Adopted October 2007 CORE STRATEGY: ADOPTED Tynedale District To Edinburgh Carter Bar Byrness Catcleugh Tynedale Reservoir R RedeA68 Otterburn Kielder Kielder Water A696 Leaplish Tower Knowe Bellingham A68 To Newcastle B6320 Chollerford B6318 To Newcastle Haydon Bridge Corbridge A69 River Greenhead A69 Tyne To Carlisle Haltwhistle Hexham A689 Prudhoe A68 A686 Slaley Allendale Derwent Res. Consett B6295 B6306 Blanchland To Darlington Alston Allenheads To M6, Penrith Photo credits: David Hardy/Tynedale Council; Lucy Greenfield/Tynedale Council; Linda Beckwith/Tynedale Council; Catherine Wood/Tynedale Council; Simon Fraser; Graeme Peacock; Helen Smith; Alan Williams/NHPA; The Kielder Partnership. © Ann Rooke / Tynedale Council Contents Page Introduction 2 Section One: A spatial portrait of Tynedale 7 Section Two: Tynedale in 2021 – a vision for sustainable development 13 Section Three: Spatial objectives 15 Section Four: General development principles 16 Section Five: The natural environment 22 Section Six: The built environment 26 Section Seven: Housing 29 Section Eight: Economic development and tourism 42 Section Nine: Town centres and retailing 46 Section Ten: Community services and facilities 51 Section Eleven: Energy 52 Appendix 1 List of smaller villages in addition to main towns and local centres 56 Appendix 2 Monitoring framework 58 Key Diagram 73 1 CORE STRATEGY: ADOPTED Introduction and ministerial statements. The Core Strategy What is the Core Strategy? has been prepared taking such national policy 0.1 The Core Strategy is one of the documents and relevant guidance into account. The that will make up the Local Development Government Office North East have been Framework. It sets out the overall spatial consulted at each step in the process and planning strategy for Tynedale up to 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • SITESOLUTIONS Highways
    SITESOLUTIONS Highways This report is issued for the site described as: Section 1: Roads Birch House Commercial Square Leigh Section 1A: IDENTIFIED Street Privately Maintained Roads HIGH WYCOMBE Buckinghamshire HP11 2QU Section 1A: Privately Maintained Footpaths IDENTIFIED Report Reference 103380002_1_1 Section 1A: Privately Maintained Verges NOT IDENTIFIED National Grid Reference 485600 193220 Section 1B: IDENTIFIED Customer Reference Traffic Schemes and Orders IDM001-0086_HWS Report Date Section 2: Roadworks 7 November 2016 Section 2A: Traffic Alerts IDENTIFIED Section 3: Rights of Access Section 3A: Existing Rights of Way CONTACT DETAILS Section 3B: NOT IDENTIFIED -------------------------------------------- Proposed or Amended Rights of Way If you require assistance please contact our customer services team on: The Responsible Authorities for the site are: Buckinghamshire County Council 0844 844 9966 -------------------------------------------- or by email at: [email protected] Highways Report Understanding This Report This report identifies matters relating to roads, footpaths and public rights of way within and abutting the site boundary. However, where all immediate areas are privately maintained we will indicate the extent of the nearest adopted highway. Section 1: Roads Section 2: Roadworks Section 1a: Roads, Footpaths and Verges Section 2a: Traffic Alerts Identifies road, footpath and verge orders in the vicinity of Identifies temporary road works in the vicinity of the site and the site; states their adoption status and details who is describes the anticipated impact. responsible for their maintenance. The reply to this enquiry is restricted to highways maintainable at the public expense Section 3: Rights of Access as defined by s.36 of the Highways Act 1980. This will include relevant details of trunk roads maintained by the Highways Section 3a: Existing Rights of Way Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Standards for 2007/8 Consultation
    Proposed Planning Best Value Performance Standards for 2007/8 Consultation A consultation paper Proposed Planning Best Value Performance Standards for 2007/8 Consultation October 2006 Department for Communities and Local Government On 5th May 2006 the responsibilities of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) transferred to the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) Department for Communities and Local Government Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone: 020 7944 4400 Website: www.communities.gov.uk © Crown Copyright, 2006 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. Any other use of the contents of this publication would require a copyright licence. Please apply for a Click-Use Licence for core material at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/system/online/pLogin.asp, or by writing to the Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or email: [email protected] If you require this publication in an alternative format please email [email protected] DCLG Publications PO Box 236 Wetherby West Yorkshire LS23 7NB Tel: 08701 226 236 Fax: 08701 226 237 Textphone: 08701 207 405 Email: [email protected] or online via the DCLG website: www.communities.gov.uk October 2006 Product Code: 06 PD 04181 Introduction The Government proposes to set further planning Best Value performance standards in 2007/08 under section 4 of the Local Government Act 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Organisation Forename Surname Job Title Region Herefordshire County
    Organisation Forename Surname Job Title Region Herefordshire County Council Rachel Andrews Organisational Development and Recruitment AdviserMidlands Wales Fenland District Council Sam Anthony Head of HR & OD South East (Inc London) Gedling Borough Council David Archer Service Manager - Organisational Development Midlands Wales Lincolnshire County Council Deborah Arrand HR Business Partner Midlands Wales Rochdale Borough Council Rosemary Barker TBC North Warwickshire County Council Dawn Barr Manager of OD Midlands Wales North Yorkshire Council Sarah Barron Senior HR Advisor North Sheffield City Council Mark Bennett Director of HR & Customer Services Midlands Wales Tameside Borough Council Tracy Berennand TBC North Manchester City Council Steven berry HROD Specialist (One to Watch Winner) North Financial Ombudsman Service Hannah Bornet Wellbeing Manager South East (Inc London) London Borough of Redbridge Andrea Bradley Human Resources Business Partner South East (Inc London) Cornwall Council Anne Branett Service Lead : Organisation & Workforce DevelopmentSouth West Leeds City Council Emma Browes HR Service Manager North Thurrock Council Andrew Brown Strategic Lead - Pay & Operations South East (Inc London) Fermanagh & Omagh District Council Themla Browne Head of HR & OD North Herefordshire County Council Lucy Campion Learning & OD Advisor Midlands Wales Onesource Hayley Camporese PPMA Rising Star Winner South East (Inc London) Essex County Council Alex Carlton Head of People Insight and Technology South East (Inc London) Lincolnshire County
    [Show full text]