DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a National Transport Tokens A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a National Transport Tokens A Appendix A National Transport Tokens A sample of councils offering tokens: Selby District Council (£8) Telford & Wrekin (£16) West Lindsey District Council (£18) City of York Council (£20) Stroud District Council (£20) Wellingborough Borough Council (£22) Wear Valley District Council (£25) West Oxfordshire District Council (£31) Councils offering tokens, on payment of a fee: North Wiltshire District Council (Pay £1 fee, receive £18 worth of tokens) Kettering Borough Council (Pay £11 fee, receive £30 worth of tokens) Wycombe District Council (Pay £15 fee, receive £30 worth of tokens) Cherwell District Council (Pay £1 fee, receive £31 worth of tokens) Braintree District Council (Pay £15 fee, receive £40 worth of tokens) East Northamptonshire District Council (Pay £10 fee, receive £47 worth of tokens) Colchester Borough Council (Pay £12 fee, receive £48 worth of tokens) Aylesbury Vale District Council (Pay £5 fee, receive £60 worth of tokens) Blyth Valley Borough Council (Pay £20 fee, receive £70 worth of tokens) Councils offering tokens to the over 60s only: West Lancashire District Council (£28) Councils offering tokens to disabled people only: Shrewsbury & Atcham Borough Council (£25) Bridgnorth District Council (£30) Christchurch Borough Council (£30) Daventry District Council (£30) East Dorset District Council (£30) Fareham Borough Council (Pay £5, receive £35 worth of tokens) Councils offering tokens of differing amounts according to age: East Hampshire District Council (£24 for 60-69 yrs, £30 for 70+ yrs, £50 for wheelchair users/blind, £75 for wheelchair users/blind with carer) Rushmoor Borough Council (£46.50 for 75+ yrs, £51.50 for disabled) South Oxfordshire District Council (£20 for 70+ yrs, £40 for disabled) Wychavon District Council (over 80s or disabled, £50 for urban and £80 for rural) Councils offering tokens of differing amounts according to geographical location: Harrogate Borough Council (£18.40 for rural, £9.20 for urban but urban is for disabled people only) Wychavon District Council (over 80s or disabled, £50 for urban and £80 for rural) Councils offering tokens to over 60s who are receiving benefits: Hart District Council (£40 for over 60s who are receiving housing or Council Tax Benefit, £55 for disabled) Appendix A Councils offering tokens provided the applicant does not own a private motor car: Purbeck District Council (£50 – applicant or their spouse must not own a car and either not have a bus stop within 0.5 miles or suffer from a medical condition that prevents them using buses) A sample of councils no longer offering tokens: Bournemouth Council Chiltern District Council (offering a £50 “taxi card” instead) East Riding of Yorkshire Elmbridge Borough Council Epsom & Ewell Borough Council Guildford Borough Council Leeds City Council Mid-Bedfordshire District Council New Forest District Council (offering £40 of “local travel vouchers” instead) North Warwickshire Borough Council (offering “taxi vouchers” instead. £40 for single, £60 for couple) Oswestry Borough Council Powys County Council Reigate & Banstead Borough Council Restormel District Council Runnymede Borough Council South Gloucestershire Council South Northamptonshire Council Test Valley Borough Council Warwick District Council (tokens replaced by a Community Taxi Scheme) Winchester City Council Woking Borough Council Information taken from Council websites on 9 th and 10 th June 2008 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weekly List of Planning Consultations 11.03.2021
    CONSERVATION CASES PROCESSED BY THE GARDENS TRUST 11.03.2021 This is a list of all the conservation consultations that The Gardens Trust has logged as receiving over the past week, consisting mainly, but not entirely, of planning applications. Cases in England are prefixed by ‘E’ and cases in Wales with ‘W’. When assessing this list to see which cases CGTs may wish to engage with, it should be remembered that the GT will only be looking at a very small minority. SITE COUNTY SENT BY REFERENCE GT REF DATE GR PROPOSAL RESPONSE RECEIVED AD BY E ENGLAND Ashton Court Avon North 21/P/0510/FUL www.n- E20/1806 08/03/2021 II* PLANNING APPLICATION 30/03/2021 Somerset somerset.gov.uk/lookatpl Conversion of Pavilion building, anningapplications incorporating a small extension, lobby, plant room, timber cladding and replacement doors and windows, resin play area and other associated works, to provide temporary classroom accommodation for up to two years by Cathedral Primary School to supplement lost classroom space. Upon termination of the temporary use, the proposed classrooms are proposed for use in perpetuity in connection with the established forest school and sports education at the application site. Provision of purpose-built, self- contained changing room facility and associated works. BUILDING ALTERATION [email protected] dmscanningrequests@n- somerset.gov.uk Benham Park Berkshire West 21/00196/HOUSE E20/1797 05/03/2021 II PLANNING APPLICATION 26/03/2021 Berkshire DC https://publicaccess.west Single storey orangery extension to berks.gov.uk/online- existing dwelling and formation of link applications/search.do?a Benham Gardens, Benham Park, Marsh ction=simple&searchTyp Benham, Newbury e=Application BUILDING ALTERATION [email protected] Ascot Place Berkshire Bracknell 21/00167/FUL E20/1799 05/03/2021 II* PLANNING APPLICATION 26/03/2021 Forest http://www.bracknell- Erection of new timber gates and brick forest.gov.uk/viewplanni piers, following removal of existing ngapplications timber gates.
    [Show full text]
  • 13742 the London Gazette, Ist November 1977 Home Office
    13742 THE LONDON GAZETTE, IST NOVEMBER 1977 CONSULTATIVE DOCUMENTS Black Notley Parish Council and People. Bleasby, People of COM(77) 483 FINAL Bletchingley Women's Institute. R/2347/77. Commission communication to the Council on Blockley Parish Council. the energy situation in the Community and in the world. Borley, People of Boughton Aluph and Eastwell, People of COMMISSION DOCUMENT DEPOSITED SEPARATELY Boys' Brigade. R/2131/77. Letter of amendment to the preliminary draft Brackley, People of general budget of the European Communities for 1978. Bracknell Development Corporation. Bracknell District Council. COM(77) 467 FINAL Braintree District Council and People. R/2361/77. Report from the Commission to the Council on Braunstone, People of the application to exported products of Council Regula- Breadsall, People of tion (EEC) No. 2967/76 laying down common standards Brighton Corporation. for the water content of frozen and deep-frozen chickens, British Association of Accountants and Auditors. hens and cocks. British Bottlers Institute. British Constitution Defence.Committee (Liverpool). COM(77) 443 FINAL British Dental Association. R/2355/77. Commission communication to the Council on 'British Medical Association. improving co-ordination of national economic policies. British Optical Association. COM(77) 473 FINAL British Railways Board. Bromesberrow Parish Council. R/23 87/77. Report on the opening, allocation and manage- Bromley Corporation. ment of the Community tariff quota in 1977 for frozen Brook, Milford Sandhills, Witley and Wormley, People of beef and veal. Broxtowe District Council. COM(77) 494 FINAL Buckingham Town Council. R/2473/77. Annual Report on the economic situation in the Burnham-on-Sea and Highbridge Town Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire HEDNA Appendices
    Buckinghamshire Housing and Economic Development Needs Assessment 2016 Study Appendices December 2016 Opinion Research Services | The Strand • Swansea • SA1 1AF | 01792 535300 | www.ors.org.uk | [email protected] Opinion Research Services ▪ Atkins | Buckinghamshire HEDNA: Study Appendices December 2016 Opinion Research Services | The Strand, Swansea SA1 1AF Jonathan Lee | David Harrison | Nigel Moore enquiries: 01792 535300 · [email protected] · www.ors.org.uk Atkins | Euston Tower, 286 Euston Road NW1 3AT Richard Ainsley enquiries: 020 7121 2280 · [email protected] · www.atkinsglobal.com © Copyright December 2016 2 Opinion Research Services ▪ Atkins | Buckinghamshire HEDNA: Study Appendices December 2016 Contents Appendix A ......................................................................................................... 4 List of Property Agents Consulted .................................................................................................................. 4 Appendix B ......................................................................................................... 5 Stakeholder workshop meeting notes............................................................................................................ 5 Appendix C ......................................................................................................... 9 Site Reconnaissance ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Appendix D .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report Monday, 4 February 2019 CONTENTS
    Daily Report Monday, 4 February 2019 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 4 February 2019 and the information is correct at the time of publication (07:00 P.M., 04 February 2019). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 7 Cabinet Office: Written ATTORNEY GENERAL 7 Questions 13 Attorney General: Trade Census: Sikhs 13 Associations 7 Cybercrime 14 Crown Prosecution Service: Cybercrime: EU Countries 14 Staff 7 Interserve 14 Crown Prosecution Service: Interserve: Living Wage 15 West Midlands 7 Reducing Regulation Road Traffic Offences: Committee 15 Prosecutions 8 DEFENCE 15 BUSINESS, ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 9 Arctic: Defence 15 Climate Change Convention 9 Armed Forces: Doctors 15 Companies: National Security 9 Armed Forces: Professional Organisations 16 Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy: Army: Deployment 16 Brexit 10 Army: Officers 16 Energy: Subsidies 10 Chinook Helicopters: Innovation and Science 11 Accidents 17 Insolvency 11 Ecuador: Military Aid 17 Iron and Steel 12 European Fighter Aircraft: Safety Measures 17 Telecommunications: National Security 12 General Electric: Rugby 18 CABINET OFFICE 13 HMS Mersey: English Channel 18 Cabinet Office: Trade Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft: Associations 13 Safety Measures 18 Ministry of Defence: Brexit 19 Ministry of Defence: Public Free School Meals: Newcastle Expenditure 19 Upon Tyne Central 36 Royal Tank
    [Show full text]
  • SAUID Exchange Name FTTC/P Available County Or Unitary Authority
    SAUID Exchange Name FTTC/P Available County or Unitary Authority EMABRIP ABBOTS RIPTON FTTC/P Now Huntingdonshire District SWABT ABERCYNON FTTC/P Now Rhondda, Cynon, Taf - Rhondda, Cynon, Taff SWAA ABERDARE FTTC Now Rhondda, Cynon, Taf - Rhondda, Cynon, Taff NSASH ABERDEEN ASHGROVE FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSBLG ABERDEEN BALGOWNIE FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSBDS ABERDEEN BIELDSIDE FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSCTR ABERDEEN CULTER FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSDEN ABERDEEN DENBURN FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSKNC ABERDEEN KINCORTH FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSKGW ABERDEEN KINGSWELLS FTTC Now Aberdeenshire NSLNG ABERDEEN LOCHNAGAR FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSNTH ABERDEEN NORTH FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSPRT ABERDEEN PORTLETHEN FTTC Now Aberdeenshire NSWES ABERDEEN WEST FTTC Now Aberdeen City WNADV ABERDOVEY FTTC/P Now Gwynedd - Gwynedd SWAG ABERGAVENNY FTTC Now Sir Fynwy - Monmouthshire SWAAZ ABERKENFIG FTTC Now Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr - Bridgend WNASO ABERSOCH FTTC/P Now Gwynedd - Gwynedd SWABD ABERTILLERY FTTC/P Now Blaenau Gwent - Blaenau Gwent WNAE ABERYSTWYTH FTTC/P Now Sir Ceredigion - Ceredigion SMAI ABINGDON FTTC & FoD Now Vale of White Horse District THAG ABINGER FTTC Now Guildford District (B) SSABS ABSON FTTC Now South Gloucestershire LCACC ACCRINGTON FTTC Now Hyndburn District (B) EAACL ACLE FTTC Now Broadland District CMACO ACOCKS GREEN FTTC & FoD Now Birmingham District (B) MYACO ACOMB FTTC & FoD Now York (B) LWACT ACTON FTTC Now Ealing London Boro SMAD ADDERBURY FTTC Now Cherwell District LSADD ADDISCOMBE FTTC Now Croydon London Boro MYADE ADEL FTTC & FoD
    [Show full text]
  • Land Off Robey's Lane, Tamworth Landscape Appraisal & Review Of
    Landscape Appraisal & Review of Meaningful Gap Assessment fpcr Hallam Land Management Ltd Land off Robey’s Lane, Tamworth Landscape Appraisal & Review of North Warwickshire Meaningful Gap Assessment March 2015 1 Landscape Appraisal & Review of Meaningful Gap Assessment fpcr FPCR Environment and Design Ltd Registered Office: Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby DE74 2RH Company No. 07128076. [T] 01509 672772 [F] 01509 674565 [E] [email protected] [W] www.fpcr.co.uk This report is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without the written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd. Ordnance Survey material is used with permission of The Controller of HMSO, Crown copyright 100018896. Rev Issue Status Prepared / Date Approved/Date -draft 06.03.15 BC 06.03.15 BC A FINAL 10.03.15 BC 10.03.15 BC 2 Landscape Appraisal & Review of Meaningful Gap Assessment fpcr 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This is a Landscape Appraisal & Review of the North Warwickshire Meaningful Gap Assessment (2015) which has been prepared by North Warwickshire Borough Council. 1.2 This report has been prepared by FPCR Environment & Design Ltd on behalf of our client, Hallam Land Management Ltd (HLM). 1.3 HLM have an interest in land to the north of the B5000 (Tamworth Road) to the east of the Tamworth. This area of land is hereon referred to as the ‘site’ and is shown in Figure 1. The local and wider context around the site, as identified in Figure 1, is referred to as the ‘Study Area.’ 1.3 The site comprises agricultural land that lies between the urban area of Tamworth to the west and the M42 Motorway to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Sampson Toovey and Katherine Shrimpton of Amersham
    DESCENDANTS OF SAMPSON TOOVEY AND KATHERINE SHRIMPTON OF AMERSHAM January 2017, revised August 2017 1 PREFACE This research was undertaken at the request of the Curator of Amersham Museum, Emily Toettcher, who wanted information about the Toovey family members who had lived in the building that now houses the museum. It was very soon apparent that much investigation had already been carried out. The trigger- factor was probably the death of Ronald Frank Toovey on 14 August 1980 in Wycombe Hospital. He was the last survivor of the four children of Frederick Samson Toovey and Sarah Ann Clare. He was unmarried, childless and intestate and, although his solicitors twice attended to try to get a Will drawn, it was too late. The solicitors commissioned a genealogist to act as heir hunter and eventually heirs were identified and the estate distributed. This seems to have generated interest in their ancestry among the descendants of Ronald Frank’s grandfather Henry Toovey (1822-1910). At that time there was considerable interest also in exploring the capabilities of computers for storing and analysing genealogical data. The Toovey family featured in an article in Computers in Genealogy in March 1993 1. In 1995 Richard Boyles wrote Toovey’s in Amersham, My Family History and kindly presented a copy to Amersham Museum. While carrying out this research he became aware of Dr DW Jopling who two years later would publish The Descendants of Toovey of Watlington, born ca 1540. A copy of this, accompanied by a roll pedigree, is in the Library of the Society of Genealogists in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham
    Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England April 2004 Contents Introduction 3 Summary of Key Findings 5 Methodology 7 Definitions of Social Grade and Area 11 Topline Findings (Marked-up Questionnaire) 13 Introduction This summary report presents the key findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England in the Derwentside District Council area, County Durham. The aim of the research was to establish residents’ views about alternative patterns of unitary local government. Background to the Research In May 2003, the Government announced that a referendum would take place in autumn 2004 in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions on whether there should be elected regional assemblies. The Government indicated that, where a regional assembly is set up, the current two-tier structure of local government - district, borough or city councils (called in this report ‘districts’) and county councils - should be replaced by a single tier of ‘unitary’ local authorities. In June 2003, the Government directed The Boundary Committee for England (‘the Committee’) to undertake an independent review of local government in two-tier areas in the three regions, with a view to recommending possible unitary structures to be put before affected local people in a referendum at a later date. MORI was commissioned by COI Communications, on behalf of the Committee, to help it gauge local opinion. The research was in two stages. First, in summer 2003, MORI researched local residents’ views about local government and how they identify with their local community.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme
    Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective 2007 – 2013 West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme Version 3 July 2012 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 – 5 2a SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS - ORIGINAL 2.1 Summary of Eligible Area - Strengths and Challenges 6 – 14 2.2 Employment 15 – 19 2.3 Competition 20 – 27 2.4 Enterprise 28 – 32 2.5 Innovation 33 – 37 2.6 Investment 38 – 42 2.7 Skills 43 – 47 2.8 Environment and Attractiveness 48 – 50 2.9 Rural 51 – 54 2.10 Urban 55 – 58 2.11 Lessons Learnt 59 – 64 2.12 SWOT Analysis 65 – 70 2b SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS – UPDATED 2010 2.1 Summary of Eligible Area - Strengths and Challenges 71 – 83 2.2 Employment 83 – 87 2.3 Competition 88 – 95 2.4 Enterprise 96 – 100 2.5 Innovation 101 – 105 2.6 Investment 106 – 111 2.7 Skills 112 – 119 2.8 Environment and Attractiveness 120 – 122 2.9 Rural 123 – 126 2.10 Urban 127 – 130 2.11 Lessons Learnt 131 – 136 2.12 SWOT Analysis 137 - 142 3 STRATEGY 3.1 Challenges 143 - 145 3.2 Policy Context 145 - 149 3.3 Priorities for Action 150 - 164 3.4 Process for Chosen Strategy 165 3.5 Alignment with the Main Strategies of the West 165 - 166 Midlands 3.6 Development of the West Midlands Economic 166 Strategy 3.7 Strategic Environmental Assessment 166 - 167 3.8 Lisbon Earmarking 167 3.9 Lisbon Agenda and the Lisbon National Reform 167 Programme 3.10 Partnership Involvement 167 3.11 Additionality 167 - 168 4 PRIORITY AXES Priority 1 – Promoting Innovation and Research and Development 4.1 Rationale and Objective 169 - 170 4.2 Description of Activities
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No. 2) Order 2004 Made - - - - 6th December 2004 Laid before Parliament 10th December 2004 Coming into force - - 31st December 2004 The First Secretary of State, having received a report from the Audit Commission(a) produced under section 99(1) of the Local Government Act 2003(b), in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 99(4) of that Act, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and application 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No.2) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 31st December 2004. (2) This Order applies in relation to English local authorities(c). Categorisation report 2. The English local authorities, to which the report of the Audit Commission dated 8th November 2004 relates, are, by this Order, categorised in accordance with their categorisation in that report. Excellent authorities 3. The local authorities listed in Schedule 1 to this Order are categorised as excellent. Good authorities 4. The local authorities listed in Schedule 2 to this Order are categorised as good. Fair authorities 5. The local authorities listed in Schedule 3 to this Order are categorised as fair. (a) For the definition of “the Audit Commission”, see section 99(7) of the Local Government Act 2003. (b) 2003 c.26. The report of the Audit Commission consists of a letter from the Chief Executive of the Audit Commission to the Minister for Local and Regional Government dated 8th November 2004 with the attached list of local authorities categorised by the Audit Commission as of that date.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Plan 27-End with Cover Ali.Qxd
    PURBECK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP - COMMUNITY PLAN FOR PURBECK PURBECK COMMUNITY 1.7. IntroductionSupporting Groups PARTNERSHIP There are other groups covering the following areas that will support the work of the Purbeck Community Partnership Task Groups: SPORT AND RECREATION Sport and recreation activities have traditionally been promoted for their own sake, however, they are now also being used to increase the quality of life for individuals and communities by successfully tackling locally identified social issues. Sport and recreation has a very important role in delivering many of the key issues that have been identified in the Purbeck Community Plan. Although sport and recreation has not been considered as a priority theme in its own right it can act as a 'vehicle' or 'tool' to help deliver the priority themes of crime reduction, transport, health, and young people. Winning the bid to host the Olympics in 2012 has guaranteed that nationally sport and recreation will have a high profile for the foreseeable future. The challenge that hosting the Olympics has set at a local level is in promoting greater participation and developing talent in competitive activities. Lead organisation: Purbeck District Council. Contact: Sport and Recreation Development Officer. Tel: 01929 557336. TOURISM Purbeck District Council Tourism Service aims to ensure that the community and economic benefits which tourism brings are maximised for the majority of the District's population, consistent with the need to minimise environmental impact. Tourism can help to drive forward priority and key issues within the community plan. This is achieved in partnership with a number of organisations including: Town & Parish Councils, Purbeck Heritage Committee, Purbeck Tourism Group, the Association of Purbeck Tourism Attractions, Swanage & Purbeck Hoteliers, the Best of Dorset Attractions Consortium, and the Jurassic Coast World Heritage Site team, to name a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Evaluation of the Inspire Public Art Project
    Participatory Evaluation of the Inspire Public Art Project Four Case Studies: Newbiggin Sailing Club, Second Avenue Home Zone, Wildspace Network, Young People’s Perception of the Project Prepared by: Barefoot Research and Evaluation [email protected] September 2005 Table of Contents Page Number Summary 2 Introduction 4 Case Studies Newbiggin Sailing Club 7 Second Avenue Home Zone 15 Wildspace Network 26 Research With Young People 37 Conclusion 45 Appendix 1: Methodology 49 Appendix 2: People and Organisations Interviewed 51 Appendix 3: Timeline for the Consultation for the Second Avenue Home Zone 52 List of Abbreviations Acronym Description BVBC Blyth Valley Borough Council CAA Cramlington Area Assembly CAP Community Area Partnership CVS Council for Voluntary Services EADT East Ashington Development Trust LSP Local Strategic Partnership NCC Northumberland County Council NOF New Opportunities Fund PE Participatory Evaluation SVA Seaton Valley Assembly WDC Wansbeck District Council WI Wansbeck Initiative 1 Summary This evaluation was commissioned to contribute to the assessment of several of Inspire’s objectives. The first of these was Objective 2: Increase the attractiveness of the environment to: local communities; stakeholder organisations; visitors; and businesses. The indicators or evidence for judging whether this objective has been achieved was the level of support for public art within local communities and stakeholder organisations. Based on the research evidence, we can conclude that there has been support from local communities and stakeholder organisations and the programme has increased the attractiveness of the environment to local communities, stakeholder organisations and visitors (no businesses were consulted). The research indicates that the programme has made every effort to consult with, and include stakeholders, within its remit for the development of public art.
    [Show full text]