DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003 Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England October 2003 Contents Introduction 1 Executive Summary 4 Local Communities 6 Defining Communities 6 Identifying Communities 6 Identity with the Local Community in the Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 7 Overall Identity 7 Effective Communities 9 Involvement 13 Affective Communities 16 Bringing Effective and Affective Communities Together 17 Local Authority Communities 19 Belonging to Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 19 Belonging to Northumberland County Council Area 22 Knowledge and Attitudes towards Local Governance 25 Knowledge of Local Governance 25 Involvement with Local Governance 26 Administrative Boundary Issues 26 Appendices 1. Methodology – Quantitative 2. Methodology - Qualitative 3. Sub-Group Definitions 4. Place Name Gazetteer 5. Qualitative Topic Guide 6. Marked-up Questionnaire Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Introduction Research Aims This report presents the findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England (referred to in this report as "The Committee") in the Castle Morpeth Borough Council area. The aim of this research is to establish the patterns of community identity in the area. Survey Coverage MORI has undertaken research in all 44 two-tier district or borough council areas in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions. The research covers two-tier local authority areas only; the results may however identify issues which overlap with adjacent areas. Reports and data for other two-tier areas are provided under separately. Castle Morpeth Borough Council (Northumberland CC) Scotland Alnwick DC (Northumberland CC) Wansbeck DC (Northumberland CC) Castle Morpeth BC (N’berland Blyth Valley BC CC) (Northumberland CC) Tynedale DC Data is available from two-tier North Tyneside authorities in these County (Northumberland CC) MBC Council areas: Cheshire Durham Cumbria Newcastle upon Lancashire Tyne City Council Northumberland North Yorkshire Key: Gateshead MBC BC = Borough Council DC = District Council CC = County Council MBC = Metropolitan Borough Council Source: MORI Methodology Both quantitative and qualitative research has been carried out in the Castle Morpeth Borough Council area, as in each two-tier district, borough or city council area in the North East region. Quantitative research seeks to answer the question of ‘what’ residents think, by measuring their attitudes on a range of pre-set questions in the context of an interview, rather than holding an in-depth discussion on the issues involved. It provides statistically robust data. 1 Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Within each two-tier district or borough council area, some 300 quantitative face- to-face interviews were carried out in-home between 19th June and 31st August 2003. A total of 1,835 interviews took place across all two-tier authorities in the Northumberland County Council area, with 310 interviews being conducted in the Castle Morpeth Borough Council area. Quotas were set by age, gender and work status using 2001 Census data. Data have been weighted back to the known demographic profile of each district or borough council area by age and gender, and for aggregate county, regional and overall findings by the population size of each individual district or borough council area. Full computer tabulations have been provided in a separate volume. Qualitative research helps probe the thinking processes and feelings of residents, and attempts to answer the question as to ‘why?’ residents might feel the way they do. In the Castle Morpeth Borough Council area, a qualitative discussion group was held to establish how residents feel about their local community. The findings from this group were analysed within the context of the findings from discussion groups in the other 43 district or borough council areas under consideration by this study. Discussion groups do not seek to offer statistical validity from a representative sample, but seek to explore attitudes and opinions in greater depth than the quantitative research allows. It should also be borne in mind that, in order to get an overview of the in-depth feelings in each area as well as explore linkages across the region, only one discussion group was held in each district or borough council area. The findings from each group should therefore be viewed in the context of the other discussion groups which have taken place, as well as the quantitative findings. This is because the findings from participants from just one discussion group may be unrepresentative of general opinion, and misleading if viewed out of context. Report Structure This report provides an overview of the findings from the research for the Castle Morpeth Borough Council area. Individual summary reports for the research conducted within each of the other two-tier authorities in the North East region have been issued under separate cover. Publication of the Data As part of our standard terms and conditions, the publication of the data in this report is subject to the advance approval of MORI. This would only be refused on the grounds of inaccuracy or misinterpretation of the findings. 2 Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Contact Details The research was carried out by MORI for COI Communications, acting on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England. Simon Atkinson, Research Director, MORI Emma Holloway, Senior Research Executive, MORI Jaime Rose, Senior Research Executive, MORI Neil Wholey, Senior Research Executive, MORI 79-81 Borough Road London SE1 1FY Tel: 020 7347 3000 Fax: 020 7347 3800 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.mori.com 3 Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Executive Summary • Residents in the Castle Morpeth Borough Council area identify most strongly with their local neighbourhood/village, and their town/nearest town. They show less identity with the administrative areas of the local two-tier councils. This is not an unusual finding, as people will generally identify with the immediate area where they have made their home, rather than a large geographical area. • The Castle Morpeth Borough Council area is largely rural, with activity concentrated on the town of Morpeth itself. Two in five residents most associate themselves with the town of Morpeth, with nearly a quarter associating with Newcastle upon Tyne. One in six residents most associate themselves with Ashington, in the neighbouring Wansbeck District Council area. • "Effective Communities" are the sense of place created by visiting practical locations which cater for shopping or leisure needs, work place, or where parents take their children to school. Morpeth is a particularly key destination for those in higher social grades, with those in lower social grades more concentrated around visiting Ashington, especially for food shopping. The towns are close to each other, and on the periphery of their council boundaries. There is a relatively strong link between residents in these two council areas. • As has been found in other district and borough council areas nearby, Newcastle upon Tyne is a local focal point - especially for clothes and household goods shopping. However, few residents actually feel that Newcastle upon Tyne is the area or community they most belong to. This suggests that it may be a good place to visit, but does not form lasting community ties. • "Affective Communities" describes the sense of place created by residents forming an emotional attachment to a community. Identity with the local neighbourhood is naturally stronger for those who take part in community activities. It is also interesting that those who stay in the local Castle Morpeth Borough Council area for their leisure and sporting activities feel a closer bond with the Council area. This has not come across as strongly in other council areas in the vicinity apart from in the Blyth Valley Borough Council area. 4 Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England • Overall, three in five Castle Morpeth Borough Council residents feel they belong to a local area or community within this council area. This is low in comparison with other district or borough council areas in the Northumberland County Council area, and appears in large part to be due to the draw of Ashington in the nearby district of Wansbeck. Interpreting the Findings • Neither the qualitative nor the quantitative research should be taken in isolation of the other, and nor should the findings of one district, borough, county or region be taken in isolation of the overall perspective provided by research in other areas. Just as residents themselves are at the centre of a number of different communities, so this research is at the centre of a wider body of research that provides context and a sense of place to the individual findings for each area. ©MORI/18710 Simon Atkinson Emma Holloway Jaime Rose Neil Wholey 5 Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Local Communities Defining Communities Communities, in the context of this research, are a sense of place. The strength of this sense of place is related to the involvement residents have in their communities, whether with people in their own immediate neighbourhood, or with places further afield through, for example, shopping trips or work. For residents there are a number of different and overlapping communities: • Administrative Communities: the sense of place created by local council administrative boundaries. • Effective Communities: the sense of place created by visiting practical locations which cater for shopping or leisure needs, or are a place of work, or where parents take their children to school. • Affective Communities: the sense of place created by residents forming an emotional attachment to a community.
Recommended publications
  • Newbiggin by the Sea Neighbourhood Plan Engagement Report 1

    Newbiggin by the Sea Neighbourhood Plan Engagement Report 1

    Newbiggin by the Sea Neighbourhood Plan Engagement Report 1 29th July 2019 Introduction As part of the process for bringing forward the Newbiggin by the Sea Neighbourhood Plan, a public engagement exercise on the key issues for the area was undertaken between 21 March and 15 April 2019. The engagement was promoted through: • Town Council website • Coverage in local media • Questionnaire distributed to all households in the Newbiggin Neighbourhood Plan area • Drop-in sessions within Newbiggin by the Sea • Hardcopy and online questionnaires available Consultation drop-in sessions were held on the following dates: Wednesday 27th March 2pm-7pm at St. Bartholomew’s Church Centre Saturday 30th March 11am -3pm at St. Bartholomew’s Church Centre Around 61 residents attended the drop-in sessions. The drop-in sessions consisted of information engagement boards, including; • Information on Neighbourhood Development Plans, • a plan of the Newbiggin Neighbourhood Area, • the ‘Big Issues’ as identified and agreed by the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group, • Potential future projects as identified by the Steering Group, and • Information on the ‘next steps’ subsequent to this engagement process. The events were staffed by the Town Clerk, Deputy Town Clerk and in part by a Northumberland County Council Planning Officer. Verbal representations made at the drop-in session included concerns that there was not enough information and that residents did not understand what they were being asked. At the close of the engagement period a total of 112 responses had been received via the online survey and hardcopy questionnaires. 3 responses were not included as they did not contain significant information to identify them as being from residents of the parish.

  • Prison Education in England and Wales. (2Nd Revised Edition)

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 388 842 CE 070 238 AUTHOR Ripley, Paul TITLE Prison Education in England and Wales. (2nd Revised Edition). Mendip Papers MP 022. INSTITUTION Staff Coll., Bristol (England). PUB DATE 93 NOTE 30p. AVAILABLE FROMStaff College, Coombe Lodge, Blagdon, Bristol BS18 6RG, England, United Kingdom (2.50 British pounds). PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; *Correctional Education; *Correctional Institutions; Correctional Rehabilitation; Criminals; *Educational History; Foreign Countries; Postsecondary Education; Prisoners; Prison Libraries; Rehabilitation Programs; Secondary Education; Vocational Rehabilitation IDENTIFIERS *England; *Wales ABSTRACT In response to prison disturbances in England and Wales in the late 1980s, the education program for prisoners was improved and more prisoners were given access to educational services. Although education is a relatively new phenomenon in the English and Welsh penal system, by the 20th century, education had become an integral part of prison life. It served partly as a control mechanism and partly for more altruistic needs. Until 1993 the management and delivery of education and training in prisons was carried out by local education authority staff. Since that time, the education responsibility has been contracted out to organizations such as the Staff College, other universities, and private training organizations. Various policy implications were resolved in order to allow these organizations to provide prison education. Today, prison education programs are probably the most comprehensive of any found in the country. They may range from literacy education to postgraduate study, with students ranging in age from 15 to over 65. The curriculum focuses on social and life skills.
  • Alnwick District Council

    Alnwick District Council

    APPENDIX 1 APPENDIX 1 ALNWICK DISTRICT COUNCIL MEETING OF THE COUNCIL JUBILEE HALL, ROTHBURY TUESDAY, 16TH OCTOBER, 2007 AT 6.30 P.M. PRESENT: Councillors P. Dawson (Chairman), Mrs. A.M. Jones (Vice- Chairman), G.R. Arckless, Mrs. E. Bainbridge, L.G. Bilboe, E.M. Blakey, S.C. Bridgett, G. Castle, K. Gray, Miss C. Grey, Mrs. M.E. Haddow, A.M. Harrington, J.M. Hedley, I. Hinson, J.E. Hobrough, J.M. Hope, C.M. Mills, Mrs. M. Mills, H.W. Philipson, D.J.C. Rixon, T.M. Spence, R. Styring, J.A. Taylor, T.N. Thorne, J.G. Watson. Officers: Chief Executive, Director of Environment and Regeneration, Head of Legal and Democratic Services. Apologies: Councillors S.A. Bell, Mrs. S.E. Bolam, Mrs. Z.B. Frais, Mrs. E. Gray. Aldermen J. Hobson and R.H. Huggins. (* Denotes a Delegated Matter) 189. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS BY MEMBERS AND OFFICERS The Chairman reminded Members that it had been agreed that previous disclosures did not need to be made again at the Council meeting provided that this was agreed by Members after a motion had been moved and seconded. RESOLVED: that all disclosures of interest previously made by Members and Officers at the meetings of Committees, etc., the minutes of which are to be considered at this meeting, are also to be regarded as disclosures for the purposes of this meeting by those Members and Officers present. The Chairman also advised that interests should be disclosed at this meeting:- a) if they were not disclosed at previous meetings, the minutes of which were to be considered at this meeting or b) in respect of any other or new item on the Agenda.
  • SAUID Exchange Name FTTC/P Available County Or Unitary Authority

    SAUID Exchange Name FTTC/P Available County Or Unitary Authority

    SAUID Exchange Name FTTC/P Available County or Unitary Authority EMABRIP ABBOTS RIPTON FTTC/P Now Huntingdonshire District SWABT ABERCYNON FTTC/P Now Rhondda, Cynon, Taf - Rhondda, Cynon, Taff SWAA ABERDARE FTTC Now Rhondda, Cynon, Taf - Rhondda, Cynon, Taff NSASH ABERDEEN ASHGROVE FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSBLG ABERDEEN BALGOWNIE FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSBDS ABERDEEN BIELDSIDE FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSCTR ABERDEEN CULTER FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSDEN ABERDEEN DENBURN FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSKNC ABERDEEN KINCORTH FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSKGW ABERDEEN KINGSWELLS FTTC Now Aberdeenshire NSLNG ABERDEEN LOCHNAGAR FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSNTH ABERDEEN NORTH FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSPRT ABERDEEN PORTLETHEN FTTC Now Aberdeenshire NSWES ABERDEEN WEST FTTC Now Aberdeen City WNADV ABERDOVEY FTTC/P Now Gwynedd - Gwynedd SWAG ABERGAVENNY FTTC Now Sir Fynwy - Monmouthshire SWAAZ ABERKENFIG FTTC Now Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr - Bridgend WNASO ABERSOCH FTTC/P Now Gwynedd - Gwynedd SWABD ABERTILLERY FTTC/P Now Blaenau Gwent - Blaenau Gwent WNAE ABERYSTWYTH FTTC/P Now Sir Ceredigion - Ceredigion SMAI ABINGDON FTTC & FoD Now Vale of White Horse District THAG ABINGER FTTC Now Guildford District (B) SSABS ABSON FTTC Now South Gloucestershire LCACC ACCRINGTON FTTC Now Hyndburn District (B) EAACL ACLE FTTC Now Broadland District CMACO ACOCKS GREEN FTTC & FoD Now Birmingham District (B) MYACO ACOMB FTTC & FoD Now York (B) LWACT ACTON FTTC Now Ealing London Boro SMAD ADDERBURY FTTC Now Cherwell District LSADD ADDISCOMBE FTTC Now Croydon London Boro MYADE ADEL FTTC & FoD
  • The Bedlington Terrier Club of America, Inc

    The Bedlington Terrier Club of America, Inc

    1 The Bedlington Terrier Club of America, Inc The Bedlington Terrier Illustrated Breed Standard with Judges and Breeders Discussion 2 This Illustrated Breed Standard is dedicated to every student of the breed seeking knowledge for judging, breeding, showing or performance. We hope this gives you a springboard for your quest to understand this lovely and unusual terrier. Linda Freeman, Managing Editor Copyright, 2010 Bedlington Terrier Club of America, Inc. 3 Table of Contents Breed Standard………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 History of the Breed………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 General Appearance……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………6 Head………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………7 Eyes…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….8 Ears………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 Nose………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….10 Jaws……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Teeth……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………11 Neck and Shoulders……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….12 Body………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………12 Legs – Front…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….16 Legs – Rear……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………..17 Feet……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….18 Tail…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………18 Coat and Color……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….20 Height
  • Minutes Pdf 261 Kb

    Minutes Pdf 261 Kb

    NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY COUNCIL CRAMLINGTON, BEDLINGTON AND SEATON VALLEY LOCAL AREA COUNCIL At the meeting of the Cramlington, Bedlington and Seaton Valley Local Area Council held Remotely on Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 4.00 pm. PRESENT C Dunbar (Chair) (in the Chair) MEMBERS L Bowman B Crosby W Daley S Dungworth B Flux A Hepple M Robinson M Swinburn R Wallace OFFICERS L Dixon Democratic Services Apprentice P Jones Service Director - Local Services L Little Senior Democratic Services Officer D Rumney Principal Programme Officer (Highways Maintenance) N Snowdon Principal Programme Officer (Highways Improvement) M Williams Team Leader - ICT Practitioner SIFA 98 MINUTES RESOLVED that the minutes of the Cramlington, Bedlington and Seaton Valley Local Area Committee held on 17 February 2021, as circulated, be agreed as a true record and were signed by the Chair. 99 LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN PROGRAMME 2021-22 AND HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE INVESTMENT IN U AND C ROADS AND FOOTWAYS PROGRAMME 2021-22 P Jones, Service Director – Local Services provided a comprehensive introduction to the report advising that the Local Transport Plan (LTP) of just over £19m had been developed following dialogue with Town and Parish Councils along with Local Ward Members. The proposed expenditure across the four key areas was as set out in the report and the highlights brought to the Members attention. Ch.’s Initials……… Cramlington, Bedlington and Seaton Valley Local Area Council, Wednesday, 17 February 2021 1 In response to a question regarding some cycle routes not completed through previous funding by Sustrans in Bedlington and if they could be completed under this scheme, Members were advised that the £3m funding identified in the budget for 2021/22 was to support the delivery of the Council’s proposed Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans (LCWIPs) which were focussed on the 12 main towns to support modal shift for short journeys to encourage more people to cycle or walk rather than use cars.
  • Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham

    Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham

    Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England April 2004 Contents Introduction 3 Summary of Key Findings 5 Methodology 7 Definitions of Social Grade and Area 11 Topline Findings (Marked-up Questionnaire) 13 Introduction This summary report presents the key findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England in the Derwentside District Council area, County Durham. The aim of the research was to establish residents’ views about alternative patterns of unitary local government. Background to the Research In May 2003, the Government announced that a referendum would take place in autumn 2004 in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions on whether there should be elected regional assemblies. The Government indicated that, where a regional assembly is set up, the current two-tier structure of local government - district, borough or city councils (called in this report ‘districts’) and county councils - should be replaced by a single tier of ‘unitary’ local authorities. In June 2003, the Government directed The Boundary Committee for England (‘the Committee’) to undertake an independent review of local government in two-tier areas in the three regions, with a view to recommending possible unitary structures to be put before affected local people in a referendum at a later date. MORI was commissioned by COI Communications, on behalf of the Committee, to help it gauge local opinion. The research was in two stages. First, in summer 2003, MORI researched local residents’ views about local government and how they identify with their local community.
  • Bedlington Terrier

    Bedlington Terrier

    FEDERATION CYNOLOGIQUE INTERNATIONALE (AISBL) SECRETARIAT GENERAL: 13, Place Albert 1 er B – 6530 Thuin (Belgique) ______________________________________________________________________________ 05.01.2011/EN FCI-Standard N° 9 BEDLINGTON TERRIER ©J.Campin, illustr. KC Picture Library This illustration does not necessarily show the ideal example of the breed. 2 ORIGIN : Great Britain. DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THE OFFICIAL VALID STANDARD : 13.10.2010. UTILIZATION : Terrier. FCI-CLASSIFICATION : Group 3 Terriers. Section 1 Large and medium sized Terriers. Without working trial. BRIEF HISTORICAL SUMMARY : It is claimed that the Bedlington can boast a longer traceable pedigree than any other terrier and once was known as the Rothbury Terrier, hailing from the former mining areas of the north of England. His fame spread outside his native region and an association was started for the breed in 1877. Although his expression is mild he is quite capable of fending for himself, but will not seek a scrap. He is a tough little dog, this unique breed has a lamb-like look about it, but don’t be fooled, and he is a terrier through and through. A North Country dog, originally his role was to catch rabbits for the family pot, and a sporting dog he still remains. GENERAL APPEARANCE : A graceful, lithe, muscular dog, with no signs of either weakness or coarseness. Whole head pear or wedge-shaped, and expression in repose mild and gentle. IMPORTANT PROPORTIONS: Body slightly greater in length than height. BEHAVIOUR AND TEMPERAMENT : Spirited and game, full of confidence.An intelligent companion with strong sporting instincts. Good-tempered, having an affectionate nature, dignified, not shy or nervous.
  • Derwentside College

    Derwentside College

    REPORT FROM THE INSPECTORATE Derwentside College August 1997 THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL The Further Education Funding Council has a legal duty to make sure further education in England is properly assessed. The FEFC’s inspectorate inspects and reports on each college of further education every four years. The inspectorate also assesses and reports nationally on the curriculum and gives advice to the FEFC’s quality assessment committee. College inspections are carried out in accordance with the framework and guidelines described in Council Circular 93/28. They involve full-time inspectors and registered part-time inspectors who have knowledge and experience in the work they inspect. Inspection teams normally include at least one member who does not work in education and a member of staff from the college being inspected. Cheylesmore House Quinton Road Coventry CV1 2WT Telephone 01203 863000 Fax 01203 863100 © FEFC 1997 You may photocopy this report. CONTENTS Paragraph Summary Introduction 1 The college and its aims 2 Responsiveness and range of provision 10 Governance and management 19 Students’ recruitment, guidance and support 30 Teaching and the promotion of learning 40 Students’ achievements 50 Quality assurance 61 Resources 70 Conclusions and issues 80 Figures GRADE DESCRIPTORS The procedures for assessing quality are set out in the Council Circular 93/28. During their inspection, inspectors assess the strengths and weaknesses of each aspect of provision they inspect. Their assessments are set out in the reports. They also use a five-point grading scale to summarise the balance between strengths and weaknesses. The descriptors for the grades are: • grade 1 – provision which has many strengths and very few weaknesses • grade 2 – provision in which the strengths clearly outweigh the weaknesses • grade 3 – provision with a balance of strengths and weaknesses • grade 4 – provision in which the weaknesses clearly outweigh the strengths • grade 5 – provision which has many weaknesses and very few strengths.
  • FOI 1155-17 Police Stations

    FOI 1155-17 Police Stations

    Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Request 835/15 - Police station closures As at 31.12.2005 31.12.2006 31.12.2007 & 2008 As at 31.12.2009 As at 31.12.2010 As at 31.12. 2011 As at 31.12.2012 to 2013 As at 31.12 2014 As at Sept.2015 As at October 2016 As at October 2017 Forecast to 31/3/2018 Status Relocated to (i) Unit 7, Signal House, Waterloo Place. (ii) Sunderland Central Fire Station, Railway Row, Sunderland. 1 Gillbridge Gillbridge Gillbridge Gillbridge Gillbridge Gillbridge Gillbridge Gillbridge Gillbridge (iii) The Old Orphanage, Hendon SOLD 2 Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington Washington 3 Millbank - South Shields Millbank - South Shields Millbank - South Shields Millbank - South Shields Millbank - South Shields Millbank - South Shields Millbank - South Shields Millbank - South Shields Millbank - South Shields Millbank - South Shields Millbank - South Shields Millbank - South Shields 4 Gateshead Gateshead Gateshead Gateshead Gateshead Gateshead Gateshead Gateshead Gateshead Gateshead Gateshead Gateshead 5 Wallsend Wallsend Wallsend Wallsend relocated to Middle Engine Lane SOLD 6 Etal Lane Etal Lane Etal Lane Etal Lane Etal Lane Etal Lane Etal Lane Etal Lane Etal Lane Etal Lane Etal Lane Etal Lane 7 Market Street Market Street Market Street Market Street Market Street Market Street Market Street Market Street/Pilgrim street Relocated to Forth Banks SOLD 8 Bedlington Bedlington Bedlington Bedlington Bedlington Bedlington Bedlington Bedlington
  • 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The

    2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The

    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No. 2) Order 2004 Made - - - - 6th December 2004 Laid before Parliament 10th December 2004 Coming into force - - 31st December 2004 The First Secretary of State, having received a report from the Audit Commission(a) produced under section 99(1) of the Local Government Act 2003(b), in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 99(4) of that Act, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and application 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No.2) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 31st December 2004. (2) This Order applies in relation to English local authorities(c). Categorisation report 2. The English local authorities, to which the report of the Audit Commission dated 8th November 2004 relates, are, by this Order, categorised in accordance with their categorisation in that report. Excellent authorities 3. The local authorities listed in Schedule 1 to this Order are categorised as excellent. Good authorities 4. The local authorities listed in Schedule 2 to this Order are categorised as good. Fair authorities 5. The local authorities listed in Schedule 3 to this Order are categorised as fair. (a) For the definition of “the Audit Commission”, see section 99(7) of the Local Government Act 2003. (b) 2003 c.26. The report of the Audit Commission consists of a letter from the Chief Executive of the Audit Commission to the Minister for Local and Regional Government dated 8th November 2004 with the attached list of local authorities categorised by the Audit Commission as of that date.
  • Northumberland Core Strategy Preferred Options 2 - October 2013 Foreword

    Northumberland Core Strategy Preferred Options 2 - October 2013 Foreword

    Northumberland Local Plan Core Strategy Preferred Options for Housing, Employment and Green Belt Consultation Document: October 2013 Contents Foreword 3 1 Introduction 4 2 A spatial portrait of Northumberland 12 3 The economy of Northumberland 24 4 The population of Northumberland 29 5 The preferred strategic development option for Northumberland – planning for economic growth 34 6 Economy and employment 38 7 Housing 46 8 Green Belt 58 9 Delivery of the preferred strategy 69 Appendices A Explanation of the Baseline Population and Household Data 115 B Equality Impact 117 C Habitats Regulations Assessment 120 D Employment land tables 121 Glossary 125 Photograph credits 135 Northumberland Core Strategy Preferred Options 2 - October 2013 Foreword Foreword As Policy Board Member for Planning, Housing and Regeneration in this new Council, I am pleased and privileged to have been given responsibility for taking forward the Council's main strategic plan – the Core Strategy. Following two earlier consultations with Northumberland people, the plan has now reached a critical stage. You have made it clear that you want to keep your communities viable and thriving but you also attach great value to Northumberland's unique environment. Our population forecasting work has left the Council in no doubt that we need a considerable amount of growth. This is the only way to keep working-age families in the County and provide housing that is affordable along with a choice of quality jobs. With all of this in mind, we have set out in this document how new homes and workplaces can be accommodated without negatively impacting on Northumberland's distinctive environment.