DOCSLIB.ORG

Win/Loss Records of the Persian and Roman Armies in the Persian Wars

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Win/Loss Records of the Persian and Roman Armies in the Persian Wars 244 Appendix 2 Appendix 2 Win/Loss Records of the Persian and Roman Armies in the Persian Wars Catalogue of Persian Wars Battles and Sieges Ephthalite/Persian – 1.4.1–16; battle; Ephthalites win (Persians lose) Amida – 1.7.1–35; siege; Persians win (Romans, in defence, lose) Amida – 1.9.1–20; siege; Romans take it back (Persians, in defence, lose) – skirmish too Dara – 1.13.1–1.14.55; battle; Romans win (Persians lose) Satala – 1.15.9–17; battle; Romans win (Persians lose) Callinicum – 1.18.1–56; battle; Persians win (Romans lose) Martyropolis – 1.21.1–28; siege; Persians give up siege (Kavadh’s death – Romans, in defence, wins) Oinochalakon – 2.3.15–27; battle; Armenians win (Romans lose) Sura – 2.5.8–27; siege; Persians win (Romans, in defence, lose) Sergiopolis – 2.5.28–33; near-siege; Persians win – Khusro shows kindness to city because of love for a woman (Romans, in defence, lose – many of the residents, transferred to Sergiopolis, died anyway) Antioch – 2.8.1–2.10.24; siege; Persians win (Romans, in defence, lose) Edessa – 2.12.6–34; siege; Romans, in defence, win (Persians lose – large digression on Abgar which takes up the bulk of the discussion of this siege; Khusro ends up with- drawing due to illness, though he does manage to get some money from the inhabitants) Dara – 2.13.16–29; siege; Romans, in defence, win (Persians fail, though they do accept money from the Romans) Petra – 2.17.3–28; siege; Persians win (force Romans, in defence, to capitulate in this case rather than storm city) Nisibis – 2.18.1–26; battle (though outside a city); difficult to say who was the victor – Persians initially get the advantage against Peter and his men until Belisarius arrives and saves the day; ultimately the Persians retreat to the city and so the Romans must get credited with the victory, even if it was a narrow one Sisauranon – 2.19.1–25; siege; Romans win (Persians, in defence, lose) Sergiopolis – 2.20.1–16; siege; Persians run out of water and are forced to abandon the siege (Romans, in defence, win – only just) Anglon – 2.25.10–35; battle; Persians win (Romans lose) Edessa – 2.26.1–2.27.46; siege; Romans, in defence, win (Persians lose – still enact a payment – the odd skirmish in this siege) © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2016 | doi 10.1163/9789004310384_010 Win/Loss Records of the Persian and Roman Armies in the Persian Wars 245 Petra et al. – 2.29.10–2.30.11; siege; Persians, in defence, win (Romans are on the verge of victory, but fail to get the desired orders to proceed with the capture of the city and then get worn down in an engagement with additional Persian forces who suc- cessfully hold a Thermopylae-like stand; ultimately they withdraw, even if the Tzani stay behind, at least for a while) Phasis River 2.30.34–48; battle; Romans win (Persians lose) Persian Record Battles:1 2–5 Sieges:2 7–6 Overall: 9–11 Roman Record Battles: 4–3 Sieges: 6–7 Overall: 10–10 Persian Trajectory L, W, L, L, L, W, L, W, W, W, L, L, W, L, L, L, W, L, W, L Roman Trajectory L, W, W, W, L, W, L, L, L, L, W, W, L, W, W, W, L, W, L, W Warfare in the Persian Wars – the Pattern: Both the Persians and Romans start off the Persians Wars with defeats; this is how the Persians furnish evidence, if any was needed, that the Romans were the superior force. The overall records of the two sides are similar, with the Romans enjoying a slight advantage. With regard to battles, the Romans have a slightly better record than the Persians, and with sieges vice versa. Staying with sieges, it should be noted, however, that Roman victories in a couple of circumstances come from external forces (health of the Persian king) and that they are by and large on the defensive: it is the Persians attacking their cities rather than the other way around, even if the record of the Romans, when they are on the offensive, is respectable (2–1). 1 The reason for the discrepancy in the battle records of Persians and Romans is that each side was engaged in a battle in which the other was not. 2 Note that of the sieges involving both the Romans and Persians 10 are offensive operations on the part of the latter: they are the ones besieging the city. What is more, on two occasions the Persians withdraw solely (or so Procopius) due to the health of their king (Kavadh’s death at Martyropolis; Khusro’s health at Edessa)..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ROUTES and COMMUNICATIONS in LATE ROMAN and BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (Ca
    ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY TÜLİN KAYA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY JULY 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu ERCİYAS Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk SERİN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşe F. EROL (Hacı Bayram Veli Uni., Arkeoloji) Assist. Prof. Dr. Emine SÖKMEN (Hitit Uni., Arkeoloji) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Tülin Kaya Signature : iii ABSTRACT ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) Kaya, Tülin Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancyra: Factors in the Development of the City *
    Eos C 2013 / fasciculus extra ordinem editus electronicus ISSN 0012-7825 ANCYRA: FACTORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY * By EDWARD DĄBROWA The name Ancyra tends to evoke associations with the Monumentum Ancyranum, the best known ancient epigraphic monument found in that city and the most important source for research on the actions of Augustus. The inscrip- tion has attracted many scholars and remains worthy of study1, but the place where it was found does not raise much scholarly interest. Few have noted the role the city played as the administrative centre of Galatia, as well as an impor- tant staging point on the road to the eastern border of the Empire, and even then only in the context of broader discussions of Roman provinces in Asia Minor. Usually authors also mention in passing something of its internal organisation as an urban centre2. And there the range of their reasons for investigating Ancyra ends, although it was one of the greatest cities in this part of Anatolia during the Roman rule. Yet it is not totally irrelevant what factors decided on its importance, since the same factors had a similar influence on the lives of a number of popu- lation centres in the northern and eastern provinces of Asia Minor. Therefore investigating these factors ought to illuminate, if in a somewhat unaccustomed manner, the causes behind the phenomenon of urban revival observable in that part of the Empire between the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD. There are few sources on which to base an inquiry into Ancyra’s history. The preserved testimonies contain only a few mentions, but they are too short and incidental to allow a detailed picture of the city’s past to be formed, so that only * Originally published in Polish in “Eos” LXII 1974, fasc.
    [Show full text]
  • Places and Peoples in Central Asia Graeco-Roman
    PLACES AND PEOPLES IN CENTRAL ASIA AND IN THE GRAECO-ROMAN NEAR EAST ¥]-^µ A MULTILINGUAL GAZETTEER COMPILED FOR THE SERICA PROJECT FROM SELECT PRE-ISLAMIC SOURCES BY PROF. SAMUEL N.C. LIEU FRAS, FRHISTS, FSA, FAHA Visiting Fellow, Wolfson College, Cambridge and Inaugural Distinguished Professor in Ancient History, Macquarie University, Sydney ¥]-^µ ANCIENT INDIA AND IRAN TRUST (AIIT) CAMBRIDGE, UK AND ANCIENT CULTURES RESEARCH CENTRE (ACRC) MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY, NSW, AUSTRALIA (JULY, 2012) ABBREVIATIONS Acta Mari = The Acts of Mār Mārī the CPD = A Concise Pahlavi Dictionary, ed. Apostle, ed. and trans. A. Harrak D. MacKenzie (Oxford, 1971). (Atlanta, 2005). Ctes. = Ctesias. AI = Acta Iranica (Leiden – Téhéran- DCBT = W.E. Soothill and L. Hodous Liège 1974f.) (eds.) A Dictionary of Chinese Akk. = Akkadian (language). Buddhist Terms (London, 1934). Amm. = Ammianus Marcellinus. DB = Inscription of Darius at Behistan, cf. Anc. Lett. = Sogdian Ancient Letters, ed. OP 116-135. H. Reichelt, Die soghdischen DB (Akk.) = The Bisitun Inscription of Handschriften-reste des Britischen Darius the Great- Babylonian Version, Museums, 2 vols. (Heidelberg 1928- ed. E.N. von Voigtlander, CII, Pt. I, 1931), ii, 1-42. Vol. 2 (London, 1978). A?P = Inscription of Artaxerxes II or III at DB (Aram.) = The Bisitun Inscription of Persepolis, cf. OP 15-56. Darius the Great- Aramaic Version, Aram. = Aramaic (language). eds. J.C. Greenfield and B. Porten, CII, Arm. = Armenian (language). Pt. I, Vol. 5 (London, 1982). Arr. = Flavius Arrianus. Déd. = J.T. Milik, Dédicaces faites par Athan. Hist. Arian. = Athanasius, Historia des dieux (Palmyra, Hatra, Tyr et des Arianorum ad Monachos, PG 25.691- thiases sémitiques à l'époque romaine 796.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Temple States' of Pontus: Comana Pontica and Zela A
    ‘TEMPLE STATES’ OF PONTUS: COMANA PONTICA AND ZELA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY EM İNE SÖKMEN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY APRIL 2005 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Numan Tuna Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Asist. Prof. Dr .Deniz Burcu Erciyas Supervisor Examining Committee Members (first name belongs to the chairperson of the jury and the second name belongs to supervisor) Prof. Dr. Suna Güven (METU,AH) Asist. Prof. Dr. Deniz Burcu Erciyas (METU, SA) Asist. Prof. Dr. Jan Krzysztof Bertram (METU, SA) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Emine Sökmen Signature : iii ABSTRACT ‘TEMPLE STATES’ OF PONTUS: COMANA PONTICA AND ZELA Sökmen, Emine M.S., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor : Asist. Prof. Dr. Deniz Burcu Erciyas April 2005, 68 pages Before the Roman rule in Asia Minor, under the Hellenistic kings, small communities lived independently within areas surrounding temples with local powers.
    [Show full text]
  • Places and Peoples in Central Asia Graeco-Roman
    PLACES AND PEOPLES IN CENTRAL ASIA AND IN THE GRAECO-ROMAN NEAR EAST ¥]-^µ A MULTILINGUAL GAZETTEER COMPILED FOR THE SERICA PROJECT FROM SELECT PRE-ISLAMIC SOURCES BY PROF. SAMUEL N.C. LIEU FRAS, FRHISTS, FSA, FAHA Visiting Fellow, Wolfson College, Cambridge and Inaugural Distinguished Professor in Ancient History, Macquarie University ¥]-^µ ANCIENT INDIA AND IRAN TRUST (AIIT) CAMBRIDGE, UK AND ANCIENT CULTURES RESEARCH CENTRE (ACRC) MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY, NSW, AUSTRALIA (FEBRUARY, 2012) ABBREVIATIONS Acta Mari = The Acts of Mār Mārī the Doc. Addai = Doctrina Addai, ed. and Apostle, ed. and trans. A. Harrak trans. G. Howard, The Teaching of (Atlanta, 2005). Addai (Chico, 1981). Akk. = Akkadian (language). DPe = Inscription of Darius at Persepolis Amm. = Ammianus Marcellinus. (E), cf. OP 136. Anc. Lett. = Sogdian Ancient Letters, ed. DSf = Inscription of Darius at Susa (F), H. Reichelt, Die soghdischen cf. OP 116-135. Handschriften-reste des Britischen DSm = Inscription of Darius at Susa (M), Museums, 2 vols. (Heidelberg 1928- cf. OP 145-465. 1931), ii, 1-42. DTXYJ = Da Tang Xiyuji 大唐西域記 (= A?P = Inscription of Artaxerxes II or III at Daito Sekki) by Xuanzang 玄奘 (Kyoto Persepolis, cf. OP 15-56. 1911); also T 2087 (Vol. 51) 868a- Arm. = Armenian (language) 946c. Arr. = Flavius Arrianus. DZc = Inscription of Darius at Suez (C), BS = Bei Shi 北史 ed. Li Yanshou 李延 cf. OP 147. 壽 (Beijing, 1974) DCESSZFSZ = Daci’ensi Sanzangfashi BW = B. Watson trans. Records of the zhaun 大慈恩寺三藏法師傳 (i.e. Life grand historian (Han dynasty) by Sima of Xuanzang 玄奘 ) T 2053 (Vol. 50) Qian, 2 vols. (Hong Kong, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Legions: a Page of the Roman Numismatic Gallery (
    Roman Legions: A Page of the Roman Numismatic Gallery (www.romancoins.info) Legion Caesar Augustus Tiberius Claudius Nero Vespasian Domitian Trajan Hadrian M. Aurel SepSev 300 AD I Adiutrix . Misenium 68 Mogontiacum Mogontiacu Brigetio 97 Brigetio Brigetio Brigetio Brigetio Galba 69/70 m 85 Dacia Camp (Otho) Sirmium 89 Parthia Bodriacum ? bis 97 Camp 114-6 I Augusta Hispania Col Agrippi Bonna Bonna 69/70 Germanica Gallia 19 BC - 16 Col Agrippina (Germanicus 9 AD - Bonna 16 - I Italica 66 Gallia Novae 69 Novae Novae Novae Novae Novae Novae Cisalp Dcia Camp 68 Lugdunum (Vitellius) I Minerva Bonna 82 Moesien Bonna Bonna -161 Bonna Bonna Dacia Camp Orient 161- Bonna 105 166 Bonna 167- I Parthica Singara (Mesopotam) II Adiutrix 69 Ravenna Deva Dacia Aquincum Aquincum Aquincum Aquincum Noviomagus -86/88 101-106 70 Singidunum Aquincum Orient 161- Lindum (Brit) 87-89 106 166 70/71-78 Aquincum 89 II Augusta 43 BC 17 Britannia 43 Glevum Glevum Isca Isca Isca Isca Isca Isca CVibius Pansa Argentorate (Vespasianus) (Gloucester) -75 (Caerleon) (Caerleon) (Caerleon) (Caerleon) (Caerleon) (Caerleon) 30 BC (Germanicus 67- 75 - Hispania T 9AD Rhein II Italica Aquilea 165 Lauriacum Lauriacum Locica 170-2 Albing 172-2 Lauriacum 205 II Parthica 197 Alba 202 Alba (Rom) Parther (Caracalla) II Traiana 105 125 Nicopolis Nicopolis Nicopolis Laodicea Nicopolis Legion Caesar Augustus Tiberius Claudius Nero Vespasian Domitian Trajan Hadrian M. Aurel SepSev 300 AD 114-116 (Aegypten) Parther 117 Judea (Ägypten) III Augusta 43 BC Ammaedra Ammaedra Ammaedra Ammaedra
    [Show full text]
  • On the Roman Frontier1
    Rome and the Worlds Beyond Its Frontiers Impact of Empire Roman Empire, c. 200 B.C.–A.D. 476 Edited by Olivier Hekster (Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) Editorial Board Lukas de Blois Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt Elio Lo Cascio Michael Peachin John Rich Christian Witschel VOLUME 21 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/imem Rome and the Worlds Beyond Its Frontiers Edited by Daniëlle Slootjes and Michael Peachin LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2016036673 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. issn 1572-0500 isbn 978-90-04-32561-6 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-32675-0 (e-book) Copyright 2016 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical World
    MAPS of the PAUL’SBIBLICAL MISSIONARY JOURNEYS WORLD MILAN VENICE ZAGREB ROMANIA BOSNA & BELGRADE BUCHAREST HERZEGOVINA CROATIA SAARAJEVO PISA SERBIA ANCONA ITALY Adriatic SeaMONTENEGRO PRISTINA Black Sea PODGORICA BULGARIA PESCARA KOSOVA SOFIA ROME SINOP SKOPJE Sinope EDIRNE Amastris Three Taverns FOGGIA MACEDONIA PONTUS SAMSUN Forum of Appius TIRANA Philippi ISTANBUL Amisos Neapolis TEKIRDAG AMASYA NAPLES Amphipolis Byzantium Hattusa Tyrrhenian Sea Thessalonica Amaseia ORDU Puteoli TARANTO Nicomedia SORRENTO Pella Apollonia Marmara Sea ALBANIA Nicaea Tavium BRINDISI Beroea Kyzikos SAPRI CANAKKALE BITHYNIA ANKARA Troy BURSA Troas MYSIA Dorylaion Gordion Larissa Aegean Sea Hadrianuthera Assos Pessinous T U R K E Y Adramytteum Cotiaeum GALATIA GREECE Mytilene Pergamon Aizanoi CATANZARO Thyatira CAPPADOCIA IZMIR ASIA PHRYGIA Prymnessus Delphi Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Mazaka Sardis PALERMO Ionian Sea Athens Antioch Pisidia MESSINA Nysa Hierapolis Rhegium Corinth Ephesus Apamea KONYA COMMOGENE Laodicea TRAPANI Olympia Mycenae Samos Tralles Iconium Aphrodisias Arsameia Epidaurus Sounion Colossae CATANIA Miletus Lystra Patmos CARIA SICILY Derbe ADANA GAZIANTEP Siracuse Sparta Halicarnassus ANTALYA Perge Tarsus Cnidus Cos LYCIA Attalia Side CILICIA Soli Korakesion Korykos Antioch Patara Mira Seleucia Rhodes Seleucia Malta Anemurion Pieria CRETE MALTA Knosos CYPRUS Salamis TUNISIA Fair Haven Paphos Kition Amathous SYRIA Kourion BEIRUT LEBANON PAUL’S MISSIONARY JOURNEYS DAMASCUS Prepared by Mediterranean Sea Sidon FIRST JOURNEY : Nazareth SECOND
    [Show full text]
  • Military Installations at Zeugma: an Overview of the Swiss Archaeological Investigations, 2001‒2003
    . chapter ten . Military Installations at Zeugma: An Overview of the Swiss Archaeological Investigations, 2001‒2003 M. Hartmann and M. A. Speidel THE HISTORICAL AND surveying the Euphrates.9 Even so, the names and gar- GEOGRAPHICAL CONTEXT rison places of only a few units are known for this early period.10 In A.D. 19, legio X Fretensis had its winter quar- The Euphrates marked most of Rome’s eastern frontier, and ters at Cyrrhus, roughly halfway between the provincial it divided the empire’s territory from the spheres of influ- capital Antioch and Zeugma.11 In the years prior to A.D. ence of Rome’s most resourceful foes, the Parthians and 66, the same legion is known to have been safeguarding Persians (fig. 1).1 The river marked the border between the the Euphrates.12 Hence, legio X Fretensis may have been two foremost empires of the ancient world,2 and, for the moved closer to the river, perhaps to a new fortress at or many different peoples of this frontier zone, it made a true near Zeugma.13 difference on which side of the border they lived.3 At any rate, a temporary Roman military camp was set The defense of Rome’s eastern frontier was the task of up in A.D. 49 apud Zeugma, when the emperor Claudius soldiers. Their duties were of such proportions that the supported a friendly Parthian prince to seize the Parthian defense of this border consumed about one quarter of throne.14 The camp was set up for a Roman military escort, Rome’s entire military force.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY
    ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY EDITED BY RICHARD J.A.TALBERT London and New York First published 1985 by Croom Helm Ltd Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 1985 Richard J.A.Talbert and contributors All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Atlas of classical history. 1. History, Ancient—Maps I. Talbert, Richard J.A. 911.3 G3201.S2 ISBN 0-203-40535-8 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-71359-1 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-03463-9 (pbk) Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Also available CONTENTS Preface v Northern Greece, Macedonia and Thrace 32 Contributors vi The Eastern Aegean and the Asia Minor Equivalent Measurements vi Hinterland 33 Attica 34–5, 181 Maps: map and text page reference placed first, Classical Athens 35–6, 181 further reading reference second Roman Athens 35–6, 181 Halicarnassus 36, 181 The Mediterranean World: Physical 1 Miletus 37, 181 The Aegean in the Bronze Age 2–5, 179 Priene 37, 181 Troy 3, 179 Greek Sicily 38–9, 181 Knossos 3, 179 Syracuse 39, 181 Minoan Crete 4–5, 179 Akragas 40, 181 Mycenae 5, 179 Cyrene 40, 182 Mycenaean Greece 4–6, 179 Olympia 41, 182 Mainland Greece in the Homeric Poems 7–8, Greek Dialects c.
    [Show full text]
  • Hükümet Faize Teslim Oldu
    Hükümet faize teslim oldu Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan yüksek faizden şikayet ederken, şok faiz artışı yapıldı. Merkez Bankası faizleri FaizlerFaizler 6.25 artırarak, yüzde 24’e yükseltti. Yılbaşından bu yana faizlerdeki artış yüzde 100’ü buldu 6.256.25 YILBAŞINDA yüzde 12 olan faiz, dokuz ayda iki katına çıktı. Mer- Gayrimenkulde TL dönemi kez Bankası’ndan yapılan açıklamada, “Kurul, fiyat istikrarını des- teklemek amacıyla güçlü bir parasal sıkılaştırma yapılmasına karar artırıldıartırıldı vermiştir” denildi. Hükümet’in faize teslim olduğunu belirten ekonomi RESMİGazete’deyeralanCumhurbaşkanıkararınagöre,menkulvegayrimenkul uzmanları, “Orta Vadeli Program’da radikal tasarruf kararları alınmazsa alım-satımilekiralamasözleşmelerindebedeller,bundanböyledövizcinsindenka- iki ay sonra durum bugünkünden çok daha kötü olur” dedi. 6’da rarlaştırılamayacak.DövizyerinesözleşmelerdeTürklirasıkullanılacak.6’da www.aydinlik.com.tr PAZAR GÜNÜ Cumhurbaşkanı AYDINLIK VATAN EMEK dövize el attı KİTAP NAMUS \\ MUSTAFA PAMUKOĞLU’NUN BAYİLERDE KURULUŞ: 1921 14 EYLÜL 2018, CUMA 2 TL YAZISI 6’DA TUZAĞATUZAĞATUZAĞA DÜŞMEYİNDÜŞMEYİNDÜŞMEYİN! oğu PERİNÇEK Türkiye’nin milli çıkarları Suriye ile bir araya gelmeyi gerektirirken Batı’yı davet ederek Dolduruşa Türk basını Reyhanlı katliamı üzerinden Suriye düşmanlığını ne kazanacaksınız? D gelmek ABD emperyalizmi kaybetmiştir. Çin’den Al- CUMHURBAŞKANI Erdoğan,ABDbası- manya’ya kadar bütün Avrasya aynı cephede bu- körükleyerek ABD’nin tuzağına düşüyor. Suriye düşmanlığına benzin nındaçıkanmakalesinde,Batıülkeleri- luşuyor.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 87 Pontus-Phasis Compiled by David Braund and T
    Map 87 Pontus-Phasis Compiled by David Braund and T. Sinclair (Turkey), 1997 with the assistance of Diane Braund Introduction Pontus The land of Pontus has two main parts, both of which belonged to the Mithridatic kingdom of Pontus in the Hellenistic period. The first is the main ridge of the Pontic mountains and the steep descent to the shore. The lower slopes are thickly wooded, and the shore districts have a humid and rainy climate. In the main Pontic ridge a gap occurs in the hinterland of Amisus (modern Samsun), after which the mountain chain continues at a lower height and with less abrupt slopes (Strabo’s term Paryadres seems to denote the higher part of the chain). As far east as Rhizaion (Rize) Greek settlements along the coast have existed since the sixth century B.C., and in the case of Sinope the seventh. To the south, the Pontic chain is bordered by Armenia Minor, a part of Armenia itself (Late Antique Sper, probably the Syspiritis of the classical authors), and what was to become the Georgian mountainous district of Tao, drained by the R. Glaukos (Oltu Çay) and the Tortum Çay. The district of Chaldia, the Gümüşhane basin, is difficult to classify, particularly in classical times, as there is no evidence that it belonged either to Pontus (in a geographical or administrative sense), to Armenia Minor, or to Armenia itself. The Roman empire made no effort to control the interior of Chaldia until the reign of Justinian. The second part of Pontus is the series of fertile inland plains, joined by relatively low chains of hills, in the river systems of the Iris (Kızıl Irmak) and the lower Halys (Yeşil Irmak).
    [Show full text]