DOCSLIB.ORG

Freshwater Dynamics Monitoring Protocol for the National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center San Francisco Bay Area Network (SFAN) Streamflow Monitoring Protocol Volume 1: Narrative and Appendixes - Version 2.92 Natural Resource Report NPS/SFAN/NRR—2011/343 ON THE COVER Olema Creek, Point Reyes National Seashore. Photograph: NPS Photograph by: (name of person or courtesy of name of park [Times New Roman 9-point font] San Francisco Bay Area Network (SFAN) Streamflow Monitoring Protocol Volume 1: Narrative and Appendixes - Version 2.92 Natural Resource Report NPS/SFAN/NRR—2011/343 Darren Fong1 David Press2 Marcus Koenen2 Michael DeBlasi2 1National Park Service Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite Bldg. 1061 Sausalito CA 94965 2National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program Fort Cronkhite Bldg. 1063 Sausalito CA 94965 April 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available from San Francisco Area Network Inventory and Monitoring website (http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/units/sfan/) and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm/). Please cite this publication as: Fong, D., D. Press, M. Koenen, and M. DeBlasi. 2011. San Francisco Bay Area Network (SFAN) streamflow monitoring protocol: volume 1: narrative and appendixes - version 2.92. Natural Resource Report NPS/SFAN/NRR—2011/343. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 963/107248, April 2011 ii Revision History Log Prev. Revision Author Changes Made Reason for Change New Version Date Version # # 2005 Mike DeBlasi 1.0 1.0 2006 Mike DeBlasi, Incorporated comments Clarification of existing 2.5 Darren Fong, from internal peer view. information, addition of Travis Smith, Significant technical information, refining Marcus Koenen, revisions from Randy methods and parameters Randy Klein Klein and Darren Fong. 2.7 2/13/2007 Darren Fong Streamlined narrative and 2.75 moved portions to SOPs 2.75 2/20/2007 Marcus Koenen Reviewed and reformatted 2.8 according to Publications Management Template. 2.8 4/11/2007 Darren Fong Revised TOC, added 2.81 figures/tables, minor edits for whole doc 2.81 5/14/2007 Paul Johnson, Proofreading and minor 2.82 Marcus Koenen, edits Darren Fong, David Press 2.82 7/27/2008 Darren Fong General edits 2.83 2.83 8/6/2008 Paul Johnson Proofreading 2.84 2.84 1/30/2009 Darren Fong, General edits Review comments 2.85 2.85 2/15/2009 Marcus Koenen Reformatted, general edits 2.86 2.86 2/19/2009 Brannon Modify narrative to 2.87 Ketcham address management and linkages to other SFAN indicator programs. 2.87 9/17/2009 Jennie Skancke Incorporated WQ SOP 9, Reviewers request 2.88 now streamflow SOP 10. 2.88 Marcus Koenen, 2.89 David Press 2.89 12/30/2009 Darren Fong 2.90 2.9 1/15/2010 Jennie Skancke Edited PNG station info 2.91 2.91 2/24/2010 Darren Fong, Major edits throughout Review comments 2.92 Marcus Koenen iii Contents Page Revision History Log ..................................................................................................................... iii Figures............................................................................................................................................ ix Tables ............................................................................................................................................. xi Appendixes .................................................................................................................................. xiii Standard Operating Procedures......................................................................................................xv Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... xvii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... xix 1.0 Background and Objectives .......................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Policies Related to Streamflow Monitoring ...................................................................... 1 1.3 Existing and Significant Freshwater Resources ................................................................ 4 1.3.1 General Hydrologic Characteristics ....................................................................... 4 1.3.2 SFAN General Watershed Descriptions and Significant Resources ....................... 6 1.4 Rationale for Selecting This Resource to Monitor .......................................................... 11 1.5 Significance to Management/Management Triggers ....................................................... 12 1.6 History of Streamflow Monitoring in the Region............................................................ 15 1.6.1 Past and Ongoing Monitoring in the Network ...................................................... 15 1.6.2 Other Regional Monitoring Programs .................................................................. 16 1.7 Monitoring Questions ...................................................................................................... 21 1.7.1 Conceptual Framework ......................................................................................... 21 1.7.2 Discussions of Specific Monitoring Questions ...................................................... 22 1.8 Monitoring Objectives ..................................................................................................... 23 1.9 SFAN Vital Sign Integration and Linkages ..................................................................... 25 v 2.0 Sampling Design ......................................................................................................................27 2.1 Monitoring Site Selection ................................................................................................ 27 2.1.1 Census .................................................................................................................... 27 2.1.2 Statistical Survey ................................................................................................... 27 2.1.3 Judgmental Sampling ............................................................................................ 27 2.2 Target Population ............................................................................................................. 27 2.3 Program Constraints ........................................................................................................ 30 2.3.1 Core Stations ......................................................................................................... 30 2.3.2 Secondary Stations ................................................................................................ 31 2.4 Representativeness (and Level of Inference) ................................................................... 31 2.5 Selection of Sampling Parameters and Frequency .......................................................... 32 2.5.1 Core Stations ......................................................................................................... 37 2.5.2 Secondary Stations ................................................................................................ 38 2.6 Sampling Units ................................................................................................................ 38 2.7 Accuracy and Detection Limits ....................................................................................... 38 2.7.1 Minimum Detectable Differences .......................................................................... 38 2.8 Co-location of Sample Sites ............................................................................................ 38 3.0 Field Methods ..........................................................................................................................41
Recommended publications
  • Presidio of San Francisco an Outline of Its Evolution As a U.S

    Presidio of San Francisco an Outline of Its Evolution As a U.S

    Special History Study Presidio of San Francisco An Outline of Its Evolution as a U.S. Army Post, 1847-1990 Presidio of San Francisco GOLDEN GATE National Recreation Area California NOV 1CM992 . Special History Study Presidio of San Francisco An Outline of Its Evolution as a U.S. Army Post, 1847-1990 August 1992 Erwin N. Thompson Sally B. Woodbridge Presidio of San Francisco GOLDEN GATE National Recreation Area California United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Denver Service Center "Significance, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder" Brian W. Dippie Printed on Recycled Paper CONTENTS PREFACE vii ABBREVIATIONS viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNINGS, 1846-1861 5 A. Takeover 5 B. The Indians 8 C. The Boundaries 9 D. Adobes, Forts, and Other Matters 10 CHAPTER 2: CIVIL WAR, 1861-1865 21 A. Organizing 21 B. Keeping the Peace 22 C. Building the Post 23 CHAPTER 3: THE PRESIDIO COMES OF AGE, 1866-1890 31 A. Peacetime 31 B. The Division Comes to the Presidio 36 C. Officers' Club, 20 46 D. Other Buildings 47 E. Troop Duty 49 F. Fort Winfield Scott 51 CHAPTER 4: BEAUTIFICATION, GROWTH, CAMPS, EARTHQUAKE, FORT WINFIELD SCOTT, 1883-1907 53 A. Beautification 53 B. Growth 64 C. Camps and Cantonments 70 D. Earthquake 75 E. Fort Winfield Scott, Again 78 CHAPTER 5: THE PRESIDIO AND THE FORT, 1906-1930 81 A. A Headquarters for the Division 81 B. Housing and Other Structures, 1907-1910 81 C. Infantry Terrace 84 D. Fires and Firemen 86 E. Barracks 35 and Cavalry Stables 90 F.
  • Peninsula-SF Map Set 010119 V43 Copy

    Peninsula-SF Map Set 010119 V43 Copy

    Map 1: Lake Merced to Stern Grove Map 2: Stern Grove to the Presidio MUNI L See See Map 4 Sunset District Taraval St. 20th Presidio Arguello Gate 21st 1 Map 2 Arguello Blvd. 34th Mountain Presidio Heights 38th Ocean A Lake 46th Parkside ve. A Larsen Temple Emanu-El Beach ve. Park A Ulloa St. 1 Divisadero St. A 200 Lake St. St. John’s ve. GGNRA Sunset Blvd. Vicente St. California St. A ve. Trocadero Inn Presbyterian Church ve. Vicente St. 200' Parkside Jordan Park Square Sava Pool 60' Wawona St. Pine Lake 19th St. Clement St. 1.0 Park 0.5 Roosevelt Geary Expwy. Wawona 0.5 P Richmond District Great Hwy. Great 0.2 . 40' t A Jr. High School Laguna Masonic S ve. stage P Sloat 0.5 Puerca le Geary Blvd. 200 a Cre V Columbarium stlake Dr. Sigmund Park - Presidio Blvd. Parker St. Blvd. 35 Stern Grove Lone Mtn. Sloat Blvd. Anza St. Rossi A P Lakeside ve. San Francisco Zoo PlaygroundStanyan St. Plaza Ocean Ave. Balboa St. Enlarged on Map 3 MUNI K 200 University of Blvd. L Fulton St. Alamo a San Francisco k McAllister Square e Lake Cabrillo St. Shrader Western Addition M B Arn e ed l 0.9 Merced l ol Skyline rc vd i d Baker St. h Stonestown P Fulton St. T The Panhandle Buena Dr. wastewater Galleria tory Dr. r 40' P n rva a to se i Fell St. 0.5 l Vista treatment s on n n F. C 0.8 0.2 plant i Joh Ken 1.3 Lake Merced W ned Oak St.
  • Presidio Trust Management Plan: Land Use Policies for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco (PTMP, Or Plan)

    Presidio Trust Management Plan: Land Use Policies for Area B of the Presidio of San Francisco (PTMP, Or Plan)

    Preface AN AERIAL VIEW OF FORT SCOTT, CAPTURED IN 2001 In 1972, in recognition of its spectacular setting, important historical resources, and rich ecological and scenic attributes, Congress decreed that if the U.S. Army no longer needed the Presidio of San Francisco, it would become part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), the country’s largest national park in an urban area. In 1989, the U.S. Army announced that the oldest continuously operating military post in the country would be closed, and so the Presidio became a park for the American people. The very characteristics that distinguish the Presidio - its many historic buildings, cultural landscapes, and urban location - also make it expensive to preserve and operate. In 1996, in recognition of the Presidio’s singular character and of the challenges and expense attending its preservation, Congress took a further step and established the Presidio Trust. Congress reasoned that “an innovative public/private partnership that minimizes cost to the United States Treasury” was necessary to 1 oversee the Presidio as a distinct part of the GGNRA. 1 The 1,491-acre Presidio of San Francisco is at the center of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), which was created by Congress in 1972. The GGNRA legislation ensured that if the military deemed the Presidio excess to its needs, jurisdiction would be transferred to the National Park Service (NPS). In 1989, the Presidio was designated for closure and in 1994, the U.S. Army transferred the Presidio to the NPS. In 1996, the Presidio Trust Act (see Appendix A) gave jurisdiction of the 1,168-acre inland area of the Presidio known as Area B to the Presidio Trust; the NPS continues to manage the shoreline, or Area A.
  • ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SAN Franciscoa

    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SAN Franciscoa

    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF SAN FRANCISCOa View of San Francisco, formerly Yerba Buena, in 1846-7, before the discovery of gold (Library of Congress) Third Edition June 2021 Compiled by Mike Wood, Co-Chairman, Rare Plants Committee California Native Plant Society - Yerba Buena Chapter ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF SAN FRANCISCO FOOTNOTES This Checklist covers the extirpated and extant native and non-native plants reported from natural and naturalistic areas within the City and County of San Francisco. These areas include lands falling under the jurisdiction of the City and County of San Francisco (e.g., the Recreation and Parks Department, the Real Estate Division, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, the a Department of Public Works, and the San Francisco Unified School District); the National Park Service (e.g., the Golden Gate National Recreation Area and the Presidio Trust); the California Department of Parks and Recreation; the University of California, San Francisco; the University of San Francisco; and privately owned parcels. References and data sources are listed in APPENDIX 1. b FAMILY: Family codes, family names and all genera mentioned in the Checklist are listed in APPENDIX 3. SCIENTIFIC NAME: Scientific names and taxonomy conform to the Jepson Flora Project (JFP, 2021). Taxa in BOLD TYPE are listed as endangered, threatened or rare (federal / state / CNPS). Nomenclature used in Howell, et al. (1958) is UNDERLINED. c Taxa highlighted in GRAY are indigenous to San Francisco, but which are presumed extirpated (i.e., those which have not been reported here since 1980, other than those that have been reintroduced).
  • In the Presidio a Reference Guide

    In the Presidio a Reference Guide

    Offered by the Presidio Trust with the John Stewart Company LIVING IN THE PRESIDIO A REFERENCE GUIDE Published April 2016 WELCOME TO THE PRESIDIO! Thank you for making your home in this one-of-a-kind national park. This guide is a “how to” manual for living in the Presidio. It introduces the Presidio’s amazing history and resources and provides detailed information about managing your home. While this guide is a helpful reference tool, it is not a substitute for your lease, the Presidio Residential Rules, and other important guidelines for living in this unique environment. As you settle into your new home and get to know the park, please feel free to contact the staff at Presidio Residences. They welcome your questions and feedback. And don’t forget that the best source for ongoing information about the park is at www.presidio.gov. Navigate to each section by clicking on the » blue links. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION MANAGING YOUR HOME THE PRESIDIO » Housing in the Presidio / 4 » General Information / 9 » Parking and Vehicles / 14 » Map / 22 » Paying Rent » Residential Parking Permits » Presidio at a Glance / 23 » Contact Information / 5 » Utility Billing and Payments » Parking Permit Fees » Presidio Residences » Renter’s Insurance » Parking in Other Areas of the Presidio » About the Presidio and the Presidio » Presidio Trust » Lock-outs and Lost Keys » Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Trust / 25 » Work Order Service Center » City CarShare » Inspections Department » Refuse and Recycling / 10 » Presidio History / 26 » Utilities Department
  • Presidio Trails and Bikeways Master Plan & Environmental Assessment TABLE of CONTENTS

    Presidio Trails and Bikeways Master Plan & Environmental Assessment TABLE of CONTENTS

    National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior The Presidio Trust Presidio of San Francisco, Golden Gate National Recreation Area July 2003 Presidio Trails and Bikeways Master Plan & Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction A Vision of the Future . .1 The Master Plan . .1 Analysis and Alternatives Development . .2 Document Organization . .2 The Presidio's History . .3 Planning Context . .4 Planning Process . .4 Public Involvement . .6 Changes to the Trails Plan . .7 Plan Implementation . .10 Prioritization and Phasing . .10 Environmental Assessment . .10 Chapter 2: Purpose and Need Project Purpose . .13 Project Need . .13 Goals . .13 Chapter 3: Trail Classifications and Design Guidelines User Groups . .17 Trails and Bikeways Classification System . .17 Pedestrian Trails . .19 Multi-Use Trails . .21 Bikeways . .22 Bikeway Design . .22 Accessibility . .24 Accessible Trails . .25 CONTENTS i Presidio Trails & Bikeways master plan Trail Features . .27 Best Management Practices . .29 Chapter 4: Alternatives Alternative Descriptions . .31 Changes to Existing Trail Corridors . .35 New Trail Corridors . .44 Overall Trail Network . .48 Comparisons at Key Locations . .58 Environmentally Preferrable Alternative . .66 Chapter 5: Environmental Consequences Introduction and Methodology . .67 Geologic Resources . .67 Hydrologic Resources . .69 Biological Resources . .71 Cultural Resources . .78 Traffic Safety . .80 Visitor Use . .83 Visual Resources . .86 Air Quality . .88 Noise . .89 Cumulative Impacts . .90 Impact Topics Dismissed from Further Analysis . .96 Chapter 6: Consultation and References Interagency Review . .97 List of Persons and Agencies Consulted . .98 List of Preparers . .99 References . .99 ii CONTENTS Chapter 7: Appendices Appendix A: Finding of No Significant Impact . .A-1 Appendix B: Response to Comments . .B-1 Appendix C: Best Management Practices .
  • San Francisco Breeding Bird Atlas

    San Francisco Breeding Bird Atlas

    San Francisco Breeding Bird Atlas Figure 1: California Quail © Alan Hopkins San Francisco Field Ornithologist’s Home Page http://www.sffo.org All material ©2001-2003 San Francisco Field Ornithologists. Additional portions may also be copyrighted by the individuals who generated those portions. Last Revised 1 June 2003 Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents........................................................................................................................2 Table of Tables ...........................................................................................................................9 Table of Figures ........................................................................................................................10 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................15 The Evolution of Natural History of San Francisco ...................................................................16 Water and Wetlands ..............................................................................................................16 Pre-colonial Flora..................................................................................................................18 Pre-colonial Fauna ................................................................................................................21 What Happened?...................................................................................................................23
  • 1 San Francisco Bay Area National Park Service Natural Resources

    1 San Francisco Bay Area National Park Service Natural Resources

    San Francisco Bay Area National Park Service Natural Resources and Science Symposium April 23, 2013 Abstracts PRESENTATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 3 THEME: ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION .............................................................................................. 3 1. Monarch Overwintering Habitat Stewardship Informed by Hemispherical Photography 3 2. Lichen Iinventory Data: How Useful Is It? ...................................................................... 3 3. Using Phytolith Analysis to Reconstruct Prehistoric Plant Communities for Restoration and Management at Pinnacles National Park ................................................................ 3 4. Towering Exotic Pines and Dwarfed Native Oaks: A Synthesis of Two Ecological Studies From the Marin Headlands................................................................................ 4 5. Determining Landscape-scale Changes in Forest Structure and Possible Management Responses to Phytophora ramorum in the Mt. Tamalpais Watershed, Marin County CA. ................................................................................................................................. 4 6. Sex, Genes And Biodiversity: Growing Plants for Restoration, Able to Withstand Climate Change and Using Practices to Reduce Our Own Environmental Footprint .... 5 7. Application of data from the Invasive Species Early Detection Program of the San Francisco Bay Area Inventory and Monitoring
  • San Francisco History Center Robert Durden

    San Francisco History Center Robert Durden

    Robert Durden Color Slide Collection (SFP 42) San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library (www.sfpl.org/sfphotos) Robert Durden Color Slide Collection (SFP 42) San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library Subject List A “ABOVE SAN FRANCISCO.” Robert Cameron AIR VIEWS. San Francisco and Bay Area AIRCRAFT (see: TRANSPORTATION) AIRPORT (see: TRANSPORTATION) APARTMENTS (see: BUILDINGS. by name) ART COMMISSION ART COMMISSION. 1961 1967 1969 1970 1975 1978 ART SHOWS. Arts. Commission Gallery, 1986 Golden Gate Park, 1967 Marina, 1962, 1966 P.G. & E., 1973 One Market Plaza, 1976 St. Francis Hospital, 1981 Stern Grove Photo Fair, 1954 ARTISTS. Unknown Artist’s Studio. ASSOCIATIONS. (see also: CENTERS) Bay View Boat Club California Historical Society California Tennis Club Campfire Girls Century Club Colonial Dames Columbia Park Boys Club Delancey Street Dovre Club (see: CENTERS. Women’s Bldg.) Dolphin Club Forest Hill Club House Friends of the Urban Forest Goodwill Knights Templar (Macedonia Church) Maritime Firemen’s Union Oddfellows Pacific Union Club Red Cross Redwood Association Sailors’ Union 1 Robert Durden Color Slide Collection (SFP 42) San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library (www.sfpl.org/sfphotos) St. Anthony’s Dining Room Salvation Army. Harbor Light Valencia St. San Francisco Association for the Blind San Francisco Boys & Girls Club San Francisco Tennis Club San Francisco Yacht Club Shanti Project Show Folks of America South End Rowing Club Women’s City Club YMCA (220 Golden Gate Ave.) YWCA (Post St.) AUTOMOBILES. Various Autos and Periods on Show and on Street. B BALBOA RESERVOIR BALLS. Black and White Ball. May 1, 1987 May 10, 1991 BANKS.

  • Vegetation Management Plan

    SUMMARY The Vegetation Management Plan (VMP) and Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Presidio of San Francisco is a collaborative planning effort between the National Park Service (NPS) and the Trust (Trust), the two agencies that share land management responsibilities for the Presidio, part of Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA). The VMP and EA conform to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and tier from the Presidio General Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) completed in 1994. The scope of this plan addresses all vegetation within the Presidio - both native plants and species introduced as landscaping. The native plant communities, diminished in size and rare within San Francisco, contain important habitat for a relatively large number of rare and endangered plant species. Historic landscape plantings and a historic forest are the result of significant design efforts and afforestation by the U.S. Army from the 1880s into the 1940s. This plan has been developed to guide the NPS and the Trust in the management of vegetation resources at the Presidio. The vegetation resources have both natural and historical significance; both aspects will be protected and enhanced. Central to the plan is the development of sustainable and enduring vegetation that can be managed with less maintenance effort than is currently required, with increased resource sensitivity, and using natural processes whenever possible. A vegetation management zoning map has been developed as the basis for future actions within three vegetation categories: native plant communities, historic forest, and landscape vegetation. The Selected Alternative for the VMP (a modification of the VMP and EA (1999) Alternative 1) directs the following management of Presidio vegetation resources: • Native plant communities will be enhanced and restored and non-native trees outside of the historic forest and other non-native plants that have invaded native habitat will be removed over time.
  • Defender of the Gate: the Presidio of San

    Defender of the Gate: the Presidio of San

    DRAFT VERSION DEFENDER OF THE GATE Presidio of San Francisco, ca. 1900-1904 Image source, U.S Army Military History Institute THE PRESIDIO OF SAN FRANCISCO A History from 1846 to 1995 by Erwin N. Thompson Historic Resource Study Golden Gate National Recreation Area National Park Service Note: This is a preprint version without photos or maps of a Historic Resource Study of the same title printed by the National Parks Service, Denver Service Center, July, 1997 (NPS-330). This volume is not otherwise available to the general public. CONTENTS PREFACE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I: SAN FRANCISCO BAY 1842-1849 ..................................................................................13 A. American Occupation ......................................................................................................13 B. John Charles Fremont ......................................................................................................15 C. Military Government....................................................................................................... 17 D. Yerba Buena .....................................................................................................................18 E. New York Volunteers .......................................................................................................20 F. The Regular Army and the Presidio ................................................................................29 CHAPTER II: THE PRESIDIO, GROWING PAINS................................................................................31
  • Rissy Field Plan

    Rissy Field Plan

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT rissy Field Plan olden Gate ation'll~creation H(J{lm./onr,(J1 n18rl'fI~'O of all units of the National Park System is to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wildlife and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment offuture generations.-From National Park Service Organic Act, 1916 as amended Environmental Assessment for Crissy Field Plan Prepared for: National Park Service Golden Gate National Recreation Area San Francisco, CA Contact: Nancy Hornor Prepared by: Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. Sacramento, CA Contact: Christy Corzine June 1996 as: Environmental assessment for Crissy Field plan. June. (JSA 95-127.) Sacramento, CA. ,,-"V'H.;>"-'" Gate National Recreation Area, San Francisco, CA. Page Section 1.0 P .. ·.. ndl"""'" and for the Proposed Action . 1-1 2.6. Environmental Commitments Induded as Part of the Project 2-36 1.1 ........................................ 1-2 2.6.1 Cultural Resources ............................. 2-36 iUIr,-,',,",AI"!O>r1i Action ................... 1-2 2.6.2 Geomorphology and Soils ....................... 2-36 1-2 2.6.3 Water Resources ............................... 2-36 ;D.-,,, .... ,,"'a.rl Action and Environmental 2.6.4 Air Quality ................................... 2-36 Assessment ,................................... 1-4 2.6.5 Public Health and Safety .................. : ..... 2-36 1.2 n".·~~.~a and Need .................................... 1-7 1.2.1 \h;",-,.t;,,,,,,,•.•••..••......................... 1-7 Section 3.0 Affected Environment ............................ 3-1 1.2.2 lLJ"u.cn .. ,F. Conditiolos ............................. 1-8 3.1 Land Use .......................................... 3-2 1.2.3 ............................ 1-10 3.1.1 Regional Context ..............................