DOCSLIB.ORG

From Might to Mandate Values in Rulers' Public Speeches

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Department of Social Sciences University of Helsinki Finland FROM MIGHT TO MANDATE VALUES IN RULERS’ PUBLIC SPEECHES IN FINLAND 1809-2000 Anneli Portman ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented for public examination, with the permission of the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Helsinki, in the Small Hall, Fabianinkatu 33, on 11 April 2014, at 12 noon. Publications of the Department of Social Research 2014:4 Social Psychology © Anneli Portman Cover: Jere Kasanen Photo: Giuseppe Zerilli Copyright of presidents photos: The Finnish Defence Forces, used by permission Distribution and Sales: Unigrafia Bookstore http://kirjakauppa.unigrafia.fi/ [email protected] PL 4 (Vuorikatu 3 A) 00014 Helsingin yliopisto ISSN-L 1798-9140 ISSN 1798-9132 (Online) ISSN 1798-9140 (Print) ISBN 978-952-10-9094-3 (Print) ISBN 978-952-10-9095-0 (Online) Unigrafia, Helsinki 2014 ABSTRACT This study looked at the values expressed in rulers’ (Czars and Presidents) public speeches in Finland from 1809-2000. During this time Finland underwent a transformation from a small, rural, backward, peripheral province into one of the forefront Western democracies in terms of transparent democratic practices, citizens’ welfare, education, and living standards. Rulers never reign in a vacuum, whether they are democratically elected presidents or hereditary emperors. Their rule is subject to cultural expectations, which is linked to the place and time of their reign. Culture, i.e. the shared beliefs and assumptions uniting both rulers and the people they reign over, influences the perceptions of what kind of reigning is recognized as just and suitable. At the core of culture are its values, the abstract goals according to which the society tries to live, concepts of what is good and worthy to be pursued. Society’s values are manifested and upheld through rituals and ceremonies, such as recurring public speeches. These speeches are most often held by the heads of state, acting as gatekeepers and spokesmen for the entire society. Three types of written collections of speeches directed to the entire population were used: Parliament Opening Speeches (1809-2000), Prayer Day Declarations (1812-1999) and New Year’s Speeches (1935-2000). The texts were analyzed using qualitative theory-driven content analysis. For the analysis a coding manual was created, which was based on Schwartz’ Theory of Basic Human Values and on previous Finnish value research. Overall changes of values in the data follow the predicted pattern of societal pluralization, but not secularization. The findings confirm the applicability of the survey-based Schwartz Value Theory also for archival value research. However, the findings also demonstrate that the two value types (Spirituality and Work- related values) found in previous Finnish studies, are also necessary to capture the essence of this timeframe. Contrary to the expectations of the value theory, Self-enhancement values (Power and Achievement) and Self-direction values are not presented as values for the individual, but only as values for the collective. The Czars and Presidents mostly differ on scope of their value emphasis. In their speeches the Czars concentrate on Benevolence, Spirituality and Conformity values, i.e. they emphasize the in-group and its welfare. As for the Presidents, they appeal to a wide variety of values, and reflect more the contemporary political situations, for instance Work-related values are accentuated especially in the times of crisis (e.g. war, recession). As the rulers present themselves as promoters of the society’s goals, they also act as creators and protectors of cohesion in their speeches. This results in the emphasis on Self- transcendence values and on values promoting social cohesion, especially Conservation values. Towards the end of the time included in this study (1980s and 1990s) there is a marked rise in Universalism values, as questions of nature 3 conservation and maintenance of global peace come to the forefront of the larger political agenda. This thesis applies social psychological viewpoints to political history, thus deepening the researching and the interpretation of historical phenomena. The results of this study underline the importance of the context in value research, and contribute to the widening of value research into political and archival data. Furthermore, this study adds to the research of how societal cohesion is rhetorically maintained. The results can also be applied in larger societal context to better understand the links between leaders and their followers. 4 TIIVISTELMÄ Tämä tutkimus tarkastelee Suomen hallitsijoiden (tsaarien ja presidenttien) julkisissa puheissa esiintyviä arvoja vuosien 1809–2000 aikana. Tänä aikana Suomessa tapahtui suuri muutos: köyhästä takapajuisesta maakunnasta Euroopan äärilaidalla tuli demokraattinen länsimaa, joka erottuu edukseen kansalaisten hyvinvoinnin, koulutuksen ja elintason suhteen. Tutkimuksen aineisto koostuu kolmenlaisista kirjallisessa muodossa olevista koko kansalle suunnatuista julkisista puheista: Valtiopäivien avajaispuheet (1809–2000), rukouspäiväjulistukset (1812–1999) sekä uudenvuodenpuheet (1935–2000). Tekstit analysoitiin käyttäen teorialähtöistä laadullista sisällönanalyysiä. Analyysi perustuu laajalti Schwartzin arvoteoriaan sekä aiempiin suomalaisiin arvotutkimuksiin. Yhteiskunnan arvot ovat jaettuja käsityksiä siitä, mikä on hyvää ja tavoittelemisen arvoista, ja ne vaikuttavat siihen, minkälainen hallitseminen näyttäytyy oikeana ja tarkoituksenmukaisena. Arvoja tuodaan ilmi muun muassa erilaisten rituaalien ja seremonioiden kautta, joita ovat esimerkiksi vuosittain toistuvat julkiset puheet. Näitä puheita pitävät yleensä hallitsijat tai muut johtohenkilöt, toimien ikään kuin koko yhteisön äänitorvina. Puheissa esiintyvät arvomuutokset seuraavat ennakoitua mallia demokratian mukanaan tuomasta yhteiskunnan monimuotoistumisesta, mutta eivät vahvista oletettua hengellisyyden ja henkisyyden väistymistä. Tutkimuksen tulokset vahvistavat kyselytutkimuksiin perustuvan Schwartzin arvoteorian soveltuvuuden myös kirjoitetun materiaaliin tutkimiseen, laajentaen sen sovellusaluetta muuhunkin kirjalliseen ja poliittiseen aineistoon. Lisäksi tulokset osoittavat että aiemmissa suomalaisissa tutkimuksissa löydetyt työn arvot sekä henkisyysarvot ovat olennaisia tämän aikavälin kulttuurin kuvaamiseksi. Toisin kuin tutkimuksen pohjalla oleva arvoteoria olettaa, eivät valta-, itseohjautuvuus- ja suoriutumisarvot ole puheissa esillä yksilön vaan yhteisön arvoina. Tutkimuksen tulokset korostavat kontekstin merkitystä arvotutkimuksessa. Tsaarien ja presidenttien suurin ero on puheissa voimakkaimmin korostettujen arvojen keskittymisessä. Tsaarit painottavat hyväntahtoisuus-, henkisyys- ja yhdenmukaisuusarvoja huomattavasti enemmän kuin muita arvoja. Presidentit puolestaan painottavat laajempaa kirjoa arvoista, jotka heijastelivat enemmän kutakin senhetkistä poliittista tilannetta. Näin oli varsinkin kriisiaikoina (esim. sodat, taloudellinen lama), jolloin myös työ itseisarvona nostettiin painokkaasti esille. Lisäksi hallitsijat asemoivat itsensä puheissaan yhtenäisyyden luojiksi ja suojelijoiksi sekä yhteisön päämäärien edistäjiksi. Tästä seuraa se, että puheissa korostettiin itsensä ylittämisarvoja ja yhtenäisyyttä edistäviä arvoja, kuten esim. yhdenmukaisuutta. Väitöskirjani soveltaa sosiaalipsykologiaa poliittisen historian tutkimukseen ja tulkintaan. Lisäksi sen tulokset valottavat sitä, kuinka yhteiskunnallista yhtenäisyyttä retorisesti ylläpidetään. Tuloksia arvojen merkityksestä yhteisöjen 5 yhdistäjinä voidaan myös soveltaa johtajien ja seuraajien välisen yhteyden tutkimiseen laajoissa yhteiskunnallisissa konteksteissa. 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have always believed that the sum is greater than its parts, that for going far, one needs to travel in company. Nowhere is this truer than in academic research. Not only have we been able to come thus far thanks to the work of those who have gone before us, but scientific knowledge is in its basic nature cumulative. I have had privilege to be surrounded by fine scholars and great thinkers, both past and present, as I have been engaged in the present research. I would like to express my sincerest thanks to the people to whom I am mostly indebted, while recognizing that many more than the space allows me to mention have also greatly influenced me through their writings or in person. First of all I want to thank my supervisor Professor Klaus Helkama. If it hadn’t been for his patient scholarly gardening, this thesis would never have emerged from the bed of weed-like profusion of ideas into to the finished work it is. His breadth and depth of understanding combined with the great kindness with which he treats others has challenged me not just as scholar, but also as a person, and I hope I will be able to emulate what I have seen in him during these years. A firm believer in a university the primary goal of which is to foster civilization and thinking, he provided an environment which was characterized by both scientific rigor and freedom of exploration, both of which greatly shaped my research. I also want to thank my external examiners, Professor Sonia Roccas and Dr. Esa Pohjanheimo, for their encouraging comments and helpful suggestions. I also want to especially thank Professor Anna-Maija Pirttilä-Backman. She has been the source for much professional and personal help and encouragement, and I will always be grateful for the patience she has shown with my numerous questions and many interruptions,
Recommended publications
  • Finnish Society Course

    Finnish Society Course

    Finnish society course Finnish society Finland is located in Europe on the northern hemisphere of the globe. Finland is one of the Nordic countries. The others are Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. Finland shares a border with three neighbouring countries: Sweden in the west, Norway in the north and Russia in the east. Finland’s population is about 5.5 million and the surface area is around 338,500 square km. The population density in Fin- land is one of lowest in Europe. Finland has many forests and lakes: up to 75% of the surface area is forest and 10% water. Suomi Venäjä The official languages of Finland are Finnish, Swedish and Sámi. 4.8 million Finnish people speak Finnish as their mother tongue, 280,000 speak Swedish, and 1,900 speak Sámi. Oth- Norja er large language groups are Russian (79,000) and Estonian Ruotsi speakers (49,000). Everyone in Finland has the right to speak Viro their own language and enjoy their culture. About 69% of Finnish people belong to the Evangelic-Lu- theran church and 1,1% to the Orthodox Church. 1.7% have other religions. About 29% of the population do not belong to any religion. Freedom of religion is respected in Finland, and everyone can follow whichever religion they choose, or none. The right to follow a religion is safeguarded under the Constitution of Finland. Finnish society course - Finnish society - 2/2021 - englanti 2 History The state People have lived in Finland for more than 9,000 years. Dur- Finland is a republic headed by the President.
  • Seppo Hentilä.Indb

    Seppo Hentilä.Indb

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto President Urho Kekkonen of Finland and the KGB K IMMO RENTOLA A major post-Cold War history debate in Finland has been over the role of President Urho Kekkonen and his relations with the Soviet Union, in particular with the Soviet foreign intelligence. No surprise to anybody, variance of interpretations has been wide, fuelled by scarcity of sources on the most sensitive aspects, by the unavoidable ambiguity of an issue like the intelligence, and even by political leanings.1 As things stand now, even a preliminary assessment of available evidence – viewed from a distance – might prove useful. The Soviet Union regularly tried to build back-channel contacts and confi dential informal links with the Western powers. On the Soviet side, these contacts were usually conducted by intelligence offi cers, as were those to Robert Kennedy on the eve of the Cuban missile crisis,2 and to Chancellor Willy Brandt during his new German Ostpolitik.3 By far the 1 A good introduction to Finnish studies on Kekkonen in J. Lavery. ‘All of the President’s Historians: The Debate over Urho Kekkonen’, Scandinavian Studies 75 (2003: 3). See also his The History of Finland. Westport: Greenwood Press 2006, and the analysis of D. Kirby, A Concise History of Finland. Cambridge University Press 2006. 2 An account by G. Bolshakov, ‘The Hot Line’, in New Times (Moscow), 1989, nos. 4-6; C. Andrew, For the President’s Eyes Only: Secret Intelligence and American Presidency from Washington to Bush.
  • The Managerial Cube

    The Managerial Cube

    ARTIKKELIT• RAIMO NURMI 269 The managerial cube Raimo Nurmi tinuum (see e.g. Nurmi, 1994, for another con­ ABSTRACT ceptualization of the relation between the two concepts). Many management textbooks argue that top The article introduces a manageria! cube thai management is in charge of the strategy and it consists of three continua: The first is management delegates the operations to the middle manage­ vs. leadership, the second strategic vs. op�rative, the third responsibility vs. power. The Pres1dents of ment and operative personnel. ln fact, top man­ Finland are reviewed and classified by means of the agement tends to be loaded with much opera­ cube. Admittedly, the interpretations remain tive routine (Mintzberg, 1973), and, strategies debatable. Nonetheless, it is argued thai the cube often emerge from middle management or even has potential for further conceptual refi�ement, empirical measurement and use as an mstrument for from the operative personnel (Viitanen, 1993). AII management development. manageria! tasks have, accordingly, strategic and operative qualities. Strategic qualities purport making the organization fit with its environment, and they include managing and leading chang­ Key words: Management, leadership, strategy, operations, responsibility, power. es, transitions and transformations. Operative qualities mean to implement the given strategy - or, in fact, sometimes even working without a strategy. ln this article, the two concepts are seen to make up a continuum. 1. INTRODUCTION Responsibility vs. power is regarded in this article as the third manageria! continuum. Re­ Management and leadership are established sponsibility refers to manageria! behaviour to concepts in literature. Management as a "coun­ maintain or improve the position of the organiza­ terpoint" of leadership refers to manageria! work tion even at the cost of the manager - the cost process: e.g., the functions of management (like may be stress, unpleasant decisions, bad pub­ planning, coordinating, controlling, etc.) have licity and other persona! problems.
  • Soldiering and the Making of Finnish Manhood

    Soldiering and the Making of Finnish Manhood

    Soldiering and the Making of Finnish Manhood Conscription and Masculinity in Interwar Finland, 1918–1939 ANDERS AHLBÄCK Doctoral Thesis in General History ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY 2010 © Anders Ahlbäck Author’s address: History Dept. of Åbo Akademi University Fabriksgatan 2 FIN-20500 Åbo Finland e-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-952-12-2508-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-952-12-2509-3 (pdf) Printed by Uniprint, Turku Table of Contents Acknowledgements v 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Images and experiences of conscripted soldiering 1 1.2 Topics in earlier research: The militarisation of modern masculinity 8 1.3 Theory and method: Conscription as a contested arena of masculinity 26 1.4 Demarcation: Soldiering and citizenship as homosocial enactments 39 2 The politics of conscription 48 2.1 Military debate on the verge of a revolution 52 2.2 The Civil War and the creation of the “White Army” 62 2.3 The militiaman challenging the cadre army soldier 72 2.4 From public indignation to closing ranks around the army 87 2.5 Conclusion: Reluctant militarisation 96 3 War heroes as war teachers 100 3.1 The narrative construction of the Jägers as war heroes 102 3.2 Absent women and distant domesticity 116 3.3 Heroic officers and their counter-images 118 3.4 Forgetfulness in the hero myth 124 3.5 The Jäger officers as military educators 127 3.6 Conclusion: The uses of war heroes 139 4 Educating the citizen-soldier 146 4.1 Civic education and the Suomen Sotilas magazine 147 4.2 The man-soldier-citizen amalgamation 154 4.3 History, forefathers and the spirit of sacrifice
  • Finnish Studies

    Finnish Studies

    Journal of Finnish Studies Volume 23 Number 1 November 2019 ISSN 1206-6516 ISBN 978-1-7328298-1-7 JOURNAL OF FINNISH STUDIES EDITORIAL AND BUSINESS OFFICE Journal of Finnish Studies, Department of English, 1901 University Avenue, Evans 458, Box 2146, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TEXAS 77341-2146, USA Tel. 1.936.294.1420; Fax 1.936.294.1408 E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL STAFF Helena Halmari, Editor-in-Chief, Sam Houston State University [email protected] Hanna Snellman, Co-Editor, University of Helsinki [email protected] Scott Kaukonen, Assoc. Editor, Sam Houston State University [email protected] Hilary-Joy Virtanen, Asst. Editor, Finlandia University [email protected] Sheila Embleton, Book Review Editor, York University [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD Börje Vähämäki, Founding Editor, JoFS, Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto Raimo Anttila, Professor Emeritus, University of California, Los Angeles Michael Branch, Professor Emeritus, University of London Thomas DuBois, Professor, University of Wisconsin, Madison Sheila Embleton, Distinguished Research Professor, York University Aili Flint, Emerita Senior Lecturer, Associate Research Scholar, Columbia University Tim Frandy, Assistant Professor, Western Kentucky University Daniel Grimley, Professor, Oxford University Titus Hjelm, Associate Professor, University of Helsinki Daniel Karvonen, Senior Lecturer, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Johanna Laakso, Professor, University of Vienna Jason Lavery, Professor, Oklahoma State University James P. Leary, Professor Emeritus, University of Wisconsin, Madison Andrew Nestingen, Associate Professor, University of Washington, Seattle Jyrki Nummi, Professor, University of Helsinki Jussi Nuorteva, Director General, The National Archives of Finland Juha Pentikäinen, Professor, University of Lapland Oiva Saarinen, Professor Emeritus, Laurentian University, Sudbury Beth L.
  • Finland's Legal Preparedness for International Disaster Response

    Finland's Legal Preparedness for International Disaster Response

    HOST NATION SUPPORT GUIDELINES Finland’s legal preparedness for international disaster response – Host Nation Support Guidelines Finnish Red Cross 2014 Report on the regulation of the reception of international aid in Finland ECHO/SUB/2012/638451 The report is part of the project titled ”Implementation of the EU Host Nation Support Guidelines”, (ECHO/SUB/2012/638451) The project is funded by the Civil Protection Financial Instrument of the European Union for 2013– 2014, provided by the European Community Humanitarian Office (ECHO) Author: Maarit Pimiä, Bachelor of Laws Mandators: The Finnish Red Cross, National Preparedness Unit The Department of Rescue Services of the Ministry of the Interior Translated by: Semantix Finland Oy Date: 14.3.2014 © Finnish Red Cross The European Commission is not responsible for the content of this report or the views expressed in this report. The authors are responsible for the content. 2 Report on the regulation of the reception of international aid in Finland ECHO/SUB/2012/638451 Contents Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 6 Definitions ............................................................................................................................. 8 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Background of the report .....................................................................................
  • Finnish Studies Volume 18 Number 2 July 2015 ISSN 1206-6516 ISBN 978-1-937875-95-4

    Finnish Studies Volume 18 Number 2 July 2015 ISSN 1206-6516 ISBN 978-1-937875-95-4

    JOURNAL OF INNISH TUDIES F S International Influences in Finnish Working-Class Literature and Its Research Guest Editors Kirsti Salmi-Niklander and Kati Launis Theme Issue of the Journal of Finnish Studies Volume 18 Number 2 July 2015 ISSN 1206-6516 ISBN 978-1-937875-95-4 JOURNAL OF FINNISH STUDIES EDITORIAL AND BUSINESS OFFICE Journal of Finnish Studies, Department of English, 1901 University Avenue, Evans 458 (P.O. Box 2146), Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77341-2146, USA Tel. 1.936.294.1420; Fax 1.936.294.1408 SUBSCRIPTIONS, ADVERTISING, AND INQUIRIES Contact Business Office (see above & below). EDITORIAL STAFF Helena Halmari, Editor-in-Chief, Sam Houston State University; [email protected] Hanna Snellman, Co-Editor, University of Helsinki; [email protected] Scott Kaukonen, Assoc. Editor, Sam Houston State University; [email protected] Hilary Joy Virtanen, Asst. Editor, Finlandia University; hilary.virtanen@finlandia. edu Sheila Embleton, Book Review Editor, York University; [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD Börje Vähämäki, Founding Editor, JoFS, Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto Raimo Anttila, Professor Emeritus, University of California, Los Angeles Michael Branch, Professor Emeritus, University of London Thomas DuBois, Professor, University of Wisconsin Sheila Embleton, Distinguished Research Professor, York University Aili Flint, Emerita Senior Lecturer, Associate Research Scholar, Columbia University Titus Hjelm, Lecturer, University College London Richard Impola, Professor Emeritus, New Paltz, New York Daniel Karvonen, Senior Lecturer, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Andrew Nestingen, Associate Professor, University of Washington, Seattle Jyrki Nummi, Professor, Department of Finnish Literature, University of Helsinki Juha Pentikäinen, Professor, Institute for Northern Culture, University of Lapland Oiva Saarinen, Professor Emeritus, Laurentian University, Sudbury George Schoolfield, Professor Emeritus, Yale University Beth L.
  • From Personality Cult Figure to Camp Image – the Case of President Urho Kekkonen

    From Personality Cult Figure to Camp Image – the Case of President Urho Kekkonen

    From personality cult figure to camp image – the case of President Urho Kekkonen Tuuli Lähdesmäki , University of Jyväskylä, Finland Volume 6, Issue 1 (May 2009) Abstract Former Finnish President Urho Kekkonen (1900-1986) has two debated monuments in Finland. The debates surrounding these monuments contain intense rhetoric which indicates a particular sentiment towards Kekkonen. This attitude is described in the article in terms of cultic discourse. During the first monument project at the end of the 1980s, Kekkonen was still broadly seen as an official political icon, which was approached through personality cultic discourse. The second monument was executed in 2000 after large critical debates over the Kekkonen era and his persona. As a result of these debates, the cultic discourse transformed its traits – Kekkonen was consciously seen as a mythological figure whose features could be exaggerated, ironized and turned into hilarious stories. In the postmodern atmosphere of the turn of the millennium, the figure of Kekkonen was even aestheticized as camp. This article explains how the cultic discourse about Kekkonen has changed in Finland during the past two decades. Keywords: personality cult, cultic discourse, camp, monument, Urho Kekkonen, Finland Cultic discourse in monument debates Erecting a monument for the commemoration of a person is a practice which frequently produces public discussions on the meanings of the monument. Sometimes the monuments even cause severe debates, in which people are only seemingly talking about the monument
  • International Human Rights Instruments As Domestic Laws

    International Human Rights Instruments As Domestic Laws

    UNITED NATIONS HRI International Distr. Human Rights GENERAL Instruments HRI/CORE/1/Add.59/Rev.2 29 June 1998 Original: ENGLISH CORE DOCUMENT FORMING PART OF THE REPORTS OF STATES PARTIES FINLAND [28 February 1997] Paragraphs Page I. THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE ............ 1 - 20 2 A. General .................. 1 - 6 2 B. A short history .............. 7 - 8 2 C. Statistical information .......... 9 2 D. The national languages .......... 10 ­ 20 5 II. CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS AND GENERAL POLITICAL STRUCTURE ................... 21 - 30 6 III. GENERAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK WITHIN WHICH HUMAN RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED .......... 31 - 50 8 IV. INFORMATION AND PUBLICITY ........... 51 ­ 55 11 GE.98-16677 (E) HRI/CORE/1/Add.59/Rev.2 page 2 I. THE LAND AND THE PEOPLE A. General 1. With a total area of 338,145 km2, Finland is the seventh largest country in Europe. The longest distance from south to north is 1,160 km and the greatest width 540 km. Its total frontier is 3,600 km in length: 2,571 km are land borders, 586 km with Sweden, 716 km with Norway, and 1,269 km with Russia. The coastline is about 1,100 km long. 2. Approximately 70 per cent of the land surface is forest, 15 per cent cultivated land, settlement or roads and 15 per cent lakes and wasteland, such as swamps, arctic fells and sand. 3. The population of Finland in 1995 was 5,116,800. The average population density is 16.8 inhabitants/km2, which varies from 134 in the industrialized south to between 2 and 3 in the sparsely populated regions of the north.
  • The Constitution of Finland and Parliament's Rules of Procedure

    The Constitution of Finland and Parliament's Rules of Procedure

    publication by the parliamentary office 3/2013 the constitution of finland and parliament’s rules of procedure The Constitution of Finland (731/1999, amendments up to 1112/2011 included) and Parliament’s Rules of Procedure (40/1999, amendments up to 1272/2010 included) NB: Unofficial translations Parliament of Finland 2013 On the cover: The facade of Parliament House Published with permission from the Ministry of Justice and Edita Publishing Oy. ISBN 978-951-53-3498-5 (nid.) ISBN 978-951-53-3499-2 (PDF) Erweko Oy Helsinki 2013 Contents The 2000 Constitution – Continuity and Strengthened Parliamentarism 5 The Constitution of Finland 13 Chapter 1 Fundamental provisions 14 Chapter 2 Basic rights and liberties 16 Chapter 3 The Parliament and the Representatives 22 Chapter 4 Parliamentary activity 25 Chapter 5 The President of the Republic and the Government 32 Chapter 6 Legislation 38 Chapter 7 State finances 42 Chapter 8 International relations 46 Chapter 9 Administration of justice 49 Chapter 10 Supervision of legality 52 Chapter 11 Administration and self-government 56 Chapter 12 National defence 58 Chapter 13 Final provisions 59 Parliament’s Rules Of Procedure 61 Chapter 1 Parliamentary session 62 Chapter 2 Bodies elected by the Parliament 63 Chapter 3 The initiation of matters in the Parliament 69 Chapter 4 Preparation of matters for plenary session 74 Chapter 5 Consideration of matters in plenary session 80 Chapter 6 Parliamentary documents 89 Chapter 7 Administration of the Parliament 91 Chapter 8 Miscellaneous provisions 93 Chapter
  • Seinäjoen Kokoomus • Sata Vuotta • 1919-2019

    Seinäjoen Kokoomus • Sata Vuotta • 1919-2019

    S E I N Ä J O E N KO KO O M U S SATA VUOTTA • 1919-2019 1919 S E I N Ä J O E N 2019 SEINÄJOEN KOKOOMUS • SATA VUOTTA • 1919-2019 Hyvä ystävä! Seinäjoen Kokoomus ry:llä on vuonna yritteliäisyys antaa mahdollisuudet 2019 tärkeä juhlavuosi: täytämme kehittää hyvinvointiamme. kunniakkaat 100 vuotta. Juhlistamme sitä juhlan ja kädessäsi olevan historiikin Haluan kiittää juhlan hetkellä lämpimästi merkeissä. Sataan vuoteen mahtuu lähes kaikkia Seinäjoen Kokoomuksessa koko itsenäisen Suomen historia ja taival. t o i m i v i a j a t o i m i n e i t a a k t i i v e j a . Vaikeuksien kautta on luotu hyvinvoin- Panoksenne yhteisten asioiden hoidossa tiyhteiskunta, jossa on moni asia hyvin. Se on ollut äärettömän tärkeää. Myöskään on vaatinut paitsi taistelua itsenäisyydestä ilman hyviä yhteistyökumppaneita, kuten myös paljon työtä ja viisaita päätöksiä, Seinäjoen kaupunkia, yhdistys ei voi joita on tehty yhdessä Suomea rakentaen. menestyä – teille myös kiitos. Erityisesti Kokoomus on ollut aina vastuullinen, h a l u a n v i e l ä k i i t t ä ä S e i n ä j o e n yksilöä kunnioittava arvopuolue, joka on Kokoomuksen kunniapuheenjohtajaa ja toiminut koko yhteiskunnan hyväksi niin juhlatoimikunnan puheenjohtaja Matti valtakunnallisesti, alueellisesti kuin Kuvajaa 100-vuotisjuhlamme valmistelun paikallisestikin. koordinoinnista ja historiikin kokoamises- ta. Seinäjoen Kokoomus on jäsenmäärältään suurin Pohjanmaan maakuntien alueella Vastuu alkaa siitä, että välittää. Tämän toimivista Kokoomuksen jäsenyhdistyk- Kokoomuksen taannoisen vaalisloganin sistä. Tänä päivänä jäseniä on noin 130. olen kokenut itselleni läheiseksi. Sen Yhdistys toimii aktiivisesti Kokoomuksen voimin jatketaan kohti satavuotiskautta Seinäjoen kunnallisjärjestössä yhteistyös- sopivasti uudistuen, hyviä perinteitä sä muiden paikallisten kokoomusyhdis- hylkäämättä.
  • International Human Rights Instruments As Domestic Laws

    International Human Rights Instruments As Domestic Laws

    UNITED NATIONS HRI Distr. International GENERAL HRI/CORE/1/Add.59/Rev.1 Human Rights 25 June 1996 Instruments Original: ENGLISH CORE DOCUMENT FORMING PART OF THE REPORTS OF STATES PARTIES FINLAND [10 August 1995] Paragraphs Page I. LAND AND THE PEOPLE ................ 1- 8 2 A. General .................... 1- 6 2 B. A short history ................ 7- 8 2 II. CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS AND GENERAL POLITICAL STRUCTURE ..................... 9-22 3 A. General .................... 9-12 3 B. The national language ............. 13-22 3 III. STATISTICAL INFORMATION .............. 23 5 IV. GENERAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK WITHIN WHICH HUMAN RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED ................... 24-39 7 V. INFORMATION AND PUBLICITY ............. 40-45 9 GE.96-16917 (E) I. LAND AND THE PEOPLE A. General 1. With a total area of 338,145 km2, Finland is the seventh largest country in Europe. The longest distance from south to north is 1,160 km and the greatest width 540 km. Its total frontier is 3,600 km in length: 2,571 km are land borders, 586 km with Sweden, 716 km with Norway, and 1,269 km with Russia. The coastline is about 1,100 km long. 2. Approximately 70 per cent of the land surface is forest, 15 per cent cultivated land, settlement or roads and 15 per cent lakes and wasteland, such as swamps, arctic fells and sand. 3. The population of Finland in 1992 reached the 5 million mark. The average population density is 16.5 inhabitants/km2, which varies from 130 in the industrialized south to between 2 and 3 in the sparsely populated regions of the north.