ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.14222 Evolution of specialization in a plant-microbial mutualism is explained by the oscillation theory of speciation Lorena Torres-Martínez,1,2 Stephanie S. Porter,3 Camille Wendlandt,3 Jessica Purcell,4 Gabriel Ortiz-Barbosa,5 Jacob Rothschild,1 Mathew Lampe,1 Farsamin Warisha,1 Tram Le,1 Alexandra J. Weisberg,6 Jeff H. Chang,6 and Joel L. Sachs1,5,7 1Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521 2E-mail:
[email protected] 3School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Vancouver, Washington 98686, United States of America 4Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States of America 5Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States of America 7Institute of Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States of America 6Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States of America Received October 5, 2020 Accepted March 14, 2021 Specialization in mutualisms is thought to be a major driver of diversification, but few studies have explored how novel special- ization evolves, or its relation to the evolution of other niche axes. A fundamental question is whether generalist interactions evolve to become more specialized (i.e., oscillation hypothesis) or if partner switches evolve without any change in niche breadth (i.e., musical chairs hypothesis). We examined alternative models for the evolution of specialization by estimating the mutualistic, climatic, and edaphic niche breadths of sister plant species, combining phylogenetic, environmental, and experimental data on Acmispon strigosus and Acmispon wrangelianus genotypes across their overlapping ranges in California.