Katrin Yr Magnusdottir Og Olafu

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Katrin Yr Magnusdottir Og Olafu 153.548 = 107 pages Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to analyze business model innovation in the social media industry. This industry of extraordinary growth and continuous technological development is driven by high level of investment from venture capitalists in their quest to find the next Facebook or the next Instagram. By conducting case studies on seven successful venture capital founded social media companies we want to map key similarities and differences in their business models. By creating a theoretical framework; the 7 Factor Model and combining it to the Business Model Canvas we identify scalability, uniqueness, loyalty, profitability, sustainability, mobility and inimitability as key value drivers. Based on our findings from the case studies we conclude that the design of business model influences the success of a social media start-up company and state that business model innovation is an important issue for these companies to react and gain competitive advantage in a world of constantly changing condition. Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Foreword ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Problem formulation .................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3. Thesis approach .......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.4. Research strategy ........................................................................................................................................ 9 1.5. Case study design ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.6. Validity and Generalization .................................................................................................................... 12 1.7. Delimitation................................................................................................................................................ 12 1.8. Thesis structure ........................................................................................................................................ 13 2. Theoretical framework ..................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1. Empirical evidence .................................................................................................................................... 14 2.2. Business Model Canvas ............................................................................................................................ 15 2.3. The 7 Factor Model ................................................................................................................................... 18 2.3.1. Scalability ........................................................................................................................................... 19 2.3.2. Uniqueness ......................................................................................................................................... 19 2.3.3. Loyalty ................................................................................................................................................. 20 2.3.4. Profitability ........................................................................................................................................ 20 2.3.5. Sustainability ..................................................................................................................................... 20 2.3.6. Mobility ............................................................................................................................................... 20 2.3.7. Inimitability ........................................................................................................................................ 20 2.3.8. The 7 Factor Model Score ................................................................................................................ 21 2.4. Combined evaluation framework .......................................................................................................... 21 3. Venture Capital .................................................................................................................................................. 22 3.1. What is venture capital? .......................................................................................................................... 22 3.2. Industry dynamics .................................................................................................................................... 22 3.3. Investment strategy .................................................................................................................................. 23 3.3.1. Industry choice .................................................................................................................................. 23 3.3.2. Stage of investment .......................................................................................................................... 23 3.4. Exit opportunities ..................................................................................................................................... 26 3.5. Investment process................................................................................................................................... 27 1 3.5.1. Screening ............................................................................................................................................ 27 3.5.2. Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................... 28 3.5.3. Investment.......................................................................................................................................... 28 3.6. The logic of the deal ................................................................................................................................. 29 3.6.1. Control mechanisms ........................................................................................................................ 29 3.6.2. Incentive mechanisms ..................................................................................................................... 30 3.6.3. Monitoring mechanisms .................................................................................................................. 30 3.6.4. Liquidity mechanisms ...................................................................................................................... 31 4. Social Media ........................................................................................................................................................ 32 4.1. What is social media? ............................................................................................................................... 32 4.2. The purpose of social media .................................................................................................................. 32 4.3. The need for social media ....................................................................................................................... 33 4.4. Smartphones, tablets and mobile applications .................................................................................. 33 4.5. Market segments in social media .......................................................................................................... 35 5. Venture Capital Investments in Social Media .............................................................................................. 37 5.1. Why invest in social media? .................................................................................................................... 37 5.2. Investment activity ................................................................................................................................... 38 5.3. Investment criteria.................................................................................................................................... 39 5.4. Business model as a key differentiator ................................................................................................ 40 5.5. Business model innovation in social media ........................................................................................ 41 5.5.1. Advertising model ............................................................................................................................ 42 5.5.2. Affiliate model .................................................................................................................................. 42 5.5.3. Crowdsourcing model ..................................................................................................................... 43 5.5.4. Freemium model ............................................................................................................................... 43 5.5.5. Merchant model ...............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Mont Pelerin Society
    A SPECIAL MEETING THE MONT PELERIN SOCIETY JANUARY 15–17, 2020 FROM THE PAST TO THE FUTURE: IDEAS AND ACTIONS FOR A FREE SOCIETY CHAPTER FORTY-ONE CHINA, GLOBALIZATION, CAPITALISM, SILICON VALLEY, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, AND EXCEPTIONALISM PETER THIEL & PETER ROBINSON HOOVER INSTITUTION • STANFORD UNIVERSITY 1 1 China, Globalization, Capitalism, Silicon Valley, Political Correctness, and Exceptionalism A Conversation Between Peter Theil and Peter Robinson January 17, 2020 Peter Robinson: The late economist and foreign policy analyst Hoover fellow Henry Rowen writing in 1996, quote, "When will China become a democracy? "The answer is around the year 2015. "This prediction is based on China's steady "and impressive economic growth, "which in turn fits the pattern of the way in which freedom "has grown in Asia and elsewhere in the World." Worked in South Korea, worked in Taiwan. Economic growth leads to democracy. In China, what went wrong? Peter Thiel: Well, Peter, this is always a set up for me to start by both flattering you and criticizing you a little bit, since there was that very famous Reagan speech you gave, that you wrote for Reagan, where it was, you know, tear down that wall, Mr. Gorbachev, and it was very effective. But it was perhaps, it was not only in the West that we learned lessons from it, the Chinese communists also paid very careful attention to it, and they learned that you had to have perestroika without glasnost. You had to get rid of the Marxism without getting rid of the Leninism, and they learned somehow the very opposite lessons of that fateful year 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise & Role of Venture Studios in Healthcare Innovation
    The Rise & Role of Venture Studios in Healthcare Innovation Session # 195, August 12, 2021 Le s Wilkins on Chief Operating Officer, Hashed Health DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are solely those of the author/presenter and do not necessarily represent any policy or position of HIMSS. 1 Welcome Le s Wilkins on Chief Operating Officer, Hashed Health #HIMSS21 2 Conflict of Interest Les Wilkinson, COO, Hashed Health Has no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report. #HIMSS21 3 Agenda • Current State of Innovation. • Studios are innovating innovation. • Studio value proposition. • Studio characteristics and structure. • Studio results. #HIMSS21 4 Learning Objectives – By the end of this session, the audience will be able to: • State common reasons healthcare startups fail and how new innovation models can de-risk the innovation process. • Describe traditional corporate innovation challenges in her/his own words. • Design a venture studio process for moving ideas to commercialization. • Apply the principles of a venture studio process to their own innovation efforts. • Identify how to differentiate between accelerators, incubators, corporate innovation programs and new venture studio models. • Recognize whether a venture studio model could be a fit for their organization. #HIMSS21 5 Startup Mythology The Garage 6 Startup Reality >90% 75% 1% Percentage of Venture Backed Startup Failure Rate Companies that NEVER Return Cash Odds of achieving Unicorn Status to Investors Source: Startup Genome, 2019 Source: CBInsights Report Source: Failory #HIMSS21 7 No Market Need Ran Out of Cash Poor User Experience Why Not the Right Team Startups Fail Pricing and COGS Competition Source: CBInsights #HIMSS21 8 Innovation is a Priority for Enterprise .
    [Show full text]
  • Social Network
    DEADLINE.com FROM THE BLACK WE HEAR-- MARK (V.O.) Did you know there are more people with genius IQ’s living in China than there are people of any kind living in the United States? ERICA (V.O.) That can’t possibly be true. MARK (V.O.) It is. ERICA (V.O.) What would account for that? MARK (V.O.) Well, first, an awful lot of people live in China. But here’s my question: FADE IN: INT. CAMPUS BAR - NIGHT MARK ZUCKERBERG is a sweet looking 19 year old whose lack of any physically intimidating attributes masks a very complicated and dangerous anger. He has trouble making eye contact and sometimes it’s hard to tell if he’s talking to you or to himself. ERICA, also 19, is Mark’s date. She has a girl-next-door face that makes her easy to fall for. At this point in the conversation she already knows that she’d rather not be there and her politeness is about to be tested. The scene is stark and simple. MARK How do you distinguish yourself in a population of people who all got 1600 on theirDEADLINE.com SAT’s? ERICA I didn’t know they take SAT’s in China. MARK They don’t. I wasn’t talking about China anymore, I was talking about me. ERICA You got 1600? MARK Yes. I could sing in an a Capella group, but I can’t sing. 2. ERICA Does that mean you actually got nothing wrong? MARK I can row crew or invent a 25 dollar PC.
    [Show full text]
  • ( Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif Tentang Alih Fungsi Situs Microblogging Twitter
    perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id ALIH FUNGSI TWITTER ( Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif tentang Alih Fungsi Situs Microblogging Twitter pada Pengguna Twitter ) SKRIPSI Oleh : NANA ROHANAWATI D1209059 Diajukan Untuk Melengkapi Tugas dan Memenuhi Syarat Guna Memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Ilmu Komunikasi pada Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sebelas Maret JURUSAN ILMU KOMUNIKASI FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET SURAKARTA 2012 commit to user i perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id PERSETUJUAN Skripsi dengan judul : ALIH FUNGSI TWITTER ( Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif tentang Alih Fungsi Situs Microblogging Twitter pada Pengguna Twitter ) Telah disetujui untuk dipertahankan di hadapan Panitia Ujian Skripsi Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Pembimbing, Drs. Alexius Ibnu M, M.Si Dra. Sri Urip Haryati, M.Si NIP. 19510717 198303 1 001 NIP. 19570821 198303 2 001 commit to user ii perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id PENGESAHAN Telah Diuji dan Disahkan oleh Panitia Ujian Skripsi Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Hari : Rabu Tanggal : 11 Januari 2012 Susunan Panitia Penguji 1. Ketua : Drs. Mursito BM, SU (.................................) NIP. 195307271980031001 2. Sekretaris : Chatarina Heny DS, S.Sos, M.Si (................................) NIP. 179612222002122002 3. Penguji I : Drs. Alexius Ibnu M, M.Si (................................) NIP. 195107171983031001 4. Penguji II : Dra. Sri Urip Haryati, M.Si (.................................) NIP. 195708211983032001 commit to user iii perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id MOTTO “ There is a will there is a way “ commit to user iv perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id PERSEMBAHAN Tuhanku “Allah SWT” Ayah dan Ibu, thanks for the best.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Master
    ! 1 Fundamentals of Screenwriting: Assessment Two Analyse EITHER a film OR a screenplay of your choice, referring in detail to one or more of the models and/ or theories of narrative structure that you have encountered on this module. --------------------------- The Social Network in an adapted screenplay based on the book ‘The Accidental Billionaires’ By Ben Mezrich. The screenplay was written by Aaron Sorkin and tells the story of the social networking site, Facebook, and its founder Mark Zuckerberg, from the inception of the idea to Zuckerberg’s establishment as one of the youngest billionaires in recent history. It also details the other people said to be involved in Facebook’s creation including Eduardo Saverin, Zuckerberg’s best friend, and the Winklevoss twins, who claim that Zuckerberg stole the idea of Facebook from them. The Social Network is both an adaptation of book ‘The Accidental Billionaires’, by Ben Mezich, and a historical adaptation. Whilst Mezrich claims to have tried to accurately re-tell the events of the creation of Facebook, himself saying “I have tried to keep the chronology as close to exact as possible” (Mezrich, 2009), Sorkin appears to have written the screenplay for The Social Network under no such restriction, adhering more to the logic mentioned in unused dialogue of Lawrence of Arabia, “History isn’t made up of truth anyhow, so why worry”. (Chopra-Gant, 2008). This essay will analyse the screenplay of the Social Network, first through the lens of a number of classical film theories, before discussing the tendency of Sorkin’s screenplay to bend rules, particularly those of the modern screenwriting gurus.
    [Show full text]
  • Jab, Jab, Jab, Right Hook
    DEDICATION TO MY TWO KIDS, MISHA AND XANDER. YOU HAVE BROUGHT A KNOCKOUT PUNCH OF LOVE TO MY LIFE THAT I DIDN’T KNOW EXISTED. AND TO THE WOMAN WHO BROUGHT THEM TO ME, THE LOVE OF MY LIFE, LIZZIE. CONTENTS Dedication Acknowledgments Author’s Note Introduction: Weigh-In Round 1: The Setup Round 2: The Characteristics of Great Content and Compelling Stories Round 3: Storytell on Facebook Round 4: Listen Well on Twitter Round 5: Glam It Up on Pinterest Round 6: Create Art on Instagram Round 7: Get Animated on Tumblr Round 8: Opportunities in Emerging Networks Round 9: Effort Round 10: All Companies Are Media Companies Round 11: Conclusion Round 12: Knockout Notes About the Author Also by Gary Vaynerchuk Credits Copyright About the Publisher ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have so many people to thank I could never fit all their names into a tweet, so I decided to put them in an acknowledgments page. First and foremost, I want to thank my family, whom I love very much and who always help me, support me, and drive me. They really are the guiding light to my life. I also want to thank Stephanie Land, who is my true partner in writing these books. This is the third book we’ve written together. Steph—thank you so much. I truly, truly could never write a book without you. Huge shout-out to my boy Nathan Scherotter, who is the CEO of this book. Nate has been an amazing friend and business associate for many years. His help in guiding this book’s content and then its sales afterward was immensely important.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Revoluciones De Facebook
    CIBERESPACIO Las revoluciones de Facebook POR JAIME YÉPEZ Las rebeliones populares, juveniles y democráticas que están tenien - da a la gente a organizarse, rompiendo do lugar en estos días en los países árabes tienen como causa pro - las jerarquías y monopolios (http://tin - yurl.com/644r2rm). funda el desempleo, el aumento del costo de la vida, la falta de Otro autor, David Weinberger , da libertades civiles y de respeto a los derechos humanos, y la aspi - la vuelta al dicho de Andy Warhol de ración de sus pueblos por derrotar a regímenes autoritarios y clep - que cada persona tiene sus 15 minutos de fama, para afirmar que cada perso - tócratas de diversa índole (repúblicas, monarquías, “democracias na es famosa para 15 personas. populares y socialistas”, etc.). Incluso un autor antiglobalización, Si bien esos son los factores desencadenantes, un instrumento Jorge Majfud , hace una contorsión intelectual para decir, al mismo tiem - común en todos estos casos ha sido la presencia de las nuevas tec - po, que los nuevos medios no consti - nologías de información y comunicación (TIC), y, en particular, tuyen un factor central en las revuel - las redes sociales (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, mensajes de tex - tas árabes, pero que posiblemente algu - na agencia de inteligencia este utili - to telefónicos, etc.). Ya sucedió algo así con las manifestaciones zándolos. escribe en la Agencia Lati - contra las FARC. Pero Facebook es mucho más. He aquí la his - noamericana de Información (ALAI) toria real de este fenómeno contemporáneo que ya tiene 600 millo - que “Los actuales levantamientos en el mundo árabe no son siquiera revolu - nes de usuarios.
    [Show full text]
  • ONLINE COMMUNITIES, ECHO CHAMBERS and the ANTI-VACCINE MOVEMENT | David R Poiner/ Curtin University
    Social Media, Communities and Networks Conference paper Online communities, echo chamber and the anti-vaccine movement David Poiner Curtin university [email protected] Keywords Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Pintrest, Twitter, Anti-Vaccine, Anti-Vax, Echo Chambers, Confirmation bias, Elective exposure theory, Bias assimilation, Targeted advertising, Online freedom, World Health Organisation, WHO Abstract In the first few months of 2019 a large amount of attention has been drawn to the roles that social media giants like Facebook, Instagram, Pintrest and Youtube are playing in the spread of misinformation. This attention has primarily been focused around the spread of anti-vaccine propaganda as a global resurgence of diseases have been observed by the World Health Organisation. These giants have created this problem through the use of targeted advertising, bolstering confirmation bias, aiding the creation of echo chambers and using their platforms to hijack the neural chemistry of its users. This paper will endeavour to show the real-world negative consequences that come hand-in-hand with giving people freedom of association online. Introduction The technology boom of the 21st century has brought with it the overconsumption of social media platforms, like Facebook, that lead to the creation of online communities. These communities allow communication and instantaneous information sharing. Albeit, factual or not. Platforms like Facebook give users the freedom to connect with likeminded peers and facilitate the forging of strong relationships. Often with complete strangers and based entirely on personal interests, hobbies, ideologies and beliefs. There are, however, potential consequences that come with this freedom. Facebook allows users to create closed communities’ and groups which have the potential ONLINE COMMUNITIES, ECHO CHAMBERS AND THE ANTI-VACCINE MOVEMENT | David R Poiner/ Curtin University to aid in the creation of online echo chambers.
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook Timeline
    Facebook Timeline 2003 October • Mark Zuckerberg releases Facemash, the predecessor to Facebook. It was described as a Harvard University version of Hot or Not. 2004 January • Zuckerberg begins writing Facebook. • Zuckerberg registers thefacebook.com domain. February • Zuckerberg launches Facebook on February 4. 650 Harvard students joined thefacebook.com in the first week of launch. March • Facebook expands to MIT, Boston University, Boston College, Northeastern University, Stanford University, Dartmouth College, Columbia University, and Yale University. April • Zuckerberg, Dustin Moskovitz, and Eduardo Saverin form Thefacebook.com LLC, a partnership. June • Facebook receives its first investment from PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel for US$500,000. • Facebook incorporates into a new company, and Napster co-founder Sean Parker becomes its president. • Facebook moves its base of operations to Palo Alto, California. N. Lee, Facebook Nation, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5308-6, 211 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 212 Facebook Timeline August • To compete with growing campus-only service i2hub, Zuckerberg launches Wirehog. It is a precursor to Facebook Platform applications. September • ConnectU files a lawsuit against Zuckerberg and other Facebook founders, resulting in a $65 million settlement. October • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a $300,000 three-year credit line. December • Facebook achieves its one millionth registered user. 2005 February • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a second $300,000 credit line and a $25,000 equity investment. April • Venture capital firm Accel Partners invests $12.7 million into Facebook. Accel’s partner and President Jim Breyer also puts up $1 million of his own money.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Thiel: What the Future Looks Like
    Peter Thiel: What The Future Looks Like Peter Thiel: Hello, this is Peter. James Altucher: Hey, Peter. This is James Altucher. Peter Thiel: Hi, how are you doing? James Altucher: Good, Peter. Thanks so much for taking the time. I’m really excited for this interview. Peter Thiel: Absolutely. Thank you so much for having me on your show. James Altucher: Oh, no problem. So I’m gonna introduce you, but first I wanna mention congratulations your book – by the time your podcast comes out, your book will have just come out, Zero to One: Notes on Startups or How to Build a Future, and, Peter, we’re just gonna dive right into it. Peter Thiel: That’s awesome. James Altucher: So I want – before I break – I wanna actually, like, break down the title almost word by word, but before I do that, I want you to tell me what the most important thing that’s happened to you today because I feel like you’re – like, every other day you’re starting, like a Facebook or a PayPal or a SpaceX or whatever. What happened to you today that you looked at? Like, what interesting things do you do on a daily basis? Peter Thiel: Well, it’s – I don’t know that there’s a single thing that’s the same from day to day, but there’s always an inspiring number of great technology ideas, great science ideas that people are working on, and so even though there are many different reasons that I have concerns about the future and trends that I don’t like in our society and in the larger world, one of the things that always gives me hope is how much people are still trying to do, how many new technologies they’re trying to build.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Technology in David Fincher's <I>The Social Network</I>
    Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville Department of English, Literature, and Modern English Seminar Capstone Research Papers Languages 4-15-2013 A New Masculinity for a New Millennium: Gender and Technology in David Fincher’s The Social Network Danielle McDonald Cedarville University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/ english_seminar_capstone Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, and the Film and Media Studies Commons Recommended Citation McDonald, Danielle, "A New Masculinity for a New Millennium: Gender and Technology in David Fincher’s The Social Network" (2013). English Seminar Capstone Research Papers. 15. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/english_seminar_capstone/15 This Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Seminar Capstone Research Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A New Masculinity for a New Millenium: Gender and Technology in David Fincher’s The Social Network Dani McDonald Dr. Deardorff Senior Seminar 15 April 2013 McDonald 2 Though critics’ praise for David Fincher’s film, The Social Network, thundered across the media, ironically, it still could not drown out the informal feminist outcry taking place on social media platforms. Blogs sprang up across cyberspace as women virulently objected to the misogyny of the film supposedly capturing “the character of a generation.” Articles and reviews titled, “Is the Facebook Movie Sexist?”, “The Social Network: Where Women Never Have Ideas,” “The Homosocial Network,” and “The Social Network’s ‘Angry Nerd Misogyny,’” proliferated from popular social commentary sites such as Slate.com, Jezebel.com, Salon.com, and IFC.com.
    [Show full text]
  • PETER THIEL Palantir Technologies; Thiel Foundation; Founders Fund; Paypal Co-Founder
    Program on SCIENCE & DEMOCRACY Science, Technology & Society LECTURE SERIES 2015 HARVARD KENNEDY SCHOOL HARVARD UNIVERSITY PETER THIEL Palantir Technologies; Thiel Foundation; Founders Fund; PayPal co-founder BACK TO THE FUTURE Will we create enough new technology to sustain our society? WITH PANELISTS WEDNESDAY Antoine Picon Travelstead Professor, Harvard Graduate School of Design March 25, 2015 Margo Seltzer Harvard College Professor, School of Engineering and 5:00-7:00pm Applied Sciences Science Center Samuel Moyn Professor of Law and History, Harvard Law School Lecture Hall C 1 Oxford Street MODERATED BY Sheila Jasanoff Harvard University Pforzheimer Professor of Science and Technology Studies CO-SPONSORED BY Program on Harvard University Harvard School of Harvard University Center for the Engineering and Graduate School Science, Technology & Society Environment Applied Sciences of Design HARVARD KENNEDY SCHOOL HARVARD UNIVERSITY http://sts.hks.harvard.edu/ Program on SCIENCE & DEMOCRACY Science, Technology & Society LECTURE SERIES 2015 HARVARD KENNEDY SCHOOL HARVARD UNIVERSITY Peter Thiel is an entrepreneur and investor. He started PayPal in 1998, led it as CEO, and took it public in 2002, defining a new era of fast and secure online commerce. In 2004 he made the first outside investment in Facebook, where he serves as a director. The same year he launched Palantir Technologies, a software company that harnesses computers to empower human analysts in fields like national security and global finance. He has provided early funding for LinkedIn, Yelp, and dozens of successful technology startups, many run by former colleagues who have been dubbed the “PayPal Mafia.” He is a partner at Founders Fund, a Silicon Valley venture capital firm that has funded companies like SpaceX and Airbnb.
    [Show full text]