DOCSLIB.ORG

In the Supreme Court

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the Supreme Court Print Form IN THE SUPREME COURT (for court system use) OF THE STATE OF ALASKA DOCKETING STATEMENT B For Use With Petitions for Hearing, Petitions for Review, and Original Applications and as a Notice of Intent to File Sentence Petition INSTRUCTIONS FOR MULTIPLE PARTIES OR ATTORNEYS: If there are multiple parties or attorneys, repeat the appropriate box. This may be done on a separate page. Please clearly indicate which attorney represents which party. No. 1. TYPE OF PETITION Date of Court of Appeals Superior Distribution of Type of Petition Court Subsequent Proceedings Decision or Order or Superior Court Judge Case Number to be Reviewed a. Petition for Hearing Petition for Rehearing: from Court of Appeals not filed filed. Date filed: b. Petition for Hearing Date of distribution of order denying petition: from Superior Court c. Petition for Review Motion for Reconsideration: Notice of Intent to file not filed Sentence Petition $1&, 2FWREHU 'DQLCrosby filed. Date filed: denied by order distribution: d. Original Application deemed denied under Civil Rule 77(k)(4). from Court of Appeals case No. from trial court case. No. Judge . Other. Explain: . 2. PETITIONER a. Name b. Status in the Trial Court Kevin Meyer, Gail Fenumiai, and State of Alaska, D Plaintiff Defendant c. Petitioner Mailing Address (not attorney’s address) Other. Specify: . 32%R[ City State Zip Code d.Telephone Juneau Alaska (907) 465-4611 3. PETITIONER’S ATTORNEY a. Name b. Bar Number Laura Fox 0905015 c. Attorney Mailing Address d. Telephone e. Fax 1031 West Fourth Avenue, Suite 200 (907) 269-5722 (907) 258-4978 City State Zip Code f.Firm/Agency Anchorage Alaska 99501 Department of Law 4. RESPONDENT a. Name b. Status in the Trial Court Arctic Village Council et al. Plaintiff Defendant c. Respondent Mailing Address Other. Specify: . C/O Native American Rights Fund City State Zip Code d.Telephone SCT-B (rev. 1/18) 5. RESPONDENT’S ATTORNEY a. Name Court Apptd b. Bar Number Natalie Landreth 0405020 c. Attorney Mailing Address d. Telephone e. Fax 745 West Fourth Avenue, Suite 502 (907) 276-0680 (907) 276-2466 City State Zip Code f.Firm/Agency Anchorage Alaska 99501 Native American Rights Fund 6. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES Is the constitutionality of a state statute or regulation at issue in this proceeding? Yes No If yes, cite statute or regulation: AS 15.20.081(d); AS 15.20.066(b)(2) 7. SENTENCE PETITIONS ONLY a. Excessiveness of the sentence is the ONLY issue. b. A transcript of the sentencing proceeding is requested because Petitioner is indigent. (If petitioner has not been adjudicated indigent by the trial court, a completed, financial statement affidavit form must be attached.) 8. ATTACHMENTS The following items are submitted with this form ( a, b, or c must be check unless this is a notice of intent to file sentence petition): a. The original petition for review and SIX copies or petition for hearing from the superior court and SIX copies; OR b. The original petition for hearing from the court of appeals and NINE copies; OR c. The original application and SIX copies. d. A copy of the judgment or order from which relief is sought attached to the original petition and EACH copy. e. A $250 filing fee or a motion to appeal at public expense (financial statement affidavit form must be included). a motion to waive filing fee (if basis for motion is inability to pay, financial statement affidavit form must be included). no filing fee is required because appellant is represented by court-appointed counsel. the state or an agency thereof. an employee appealing denial of benefits under AS 23.20 (Employment Security Act) f. A motion for expedited action submitted not submitted. g. A motion for stay of trial court proceedings submitted not submitted 2FWREHU V/DXUD)R[ Date Signature of Petitioner or Petitioner’s Attorney CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on a copy of this docketing statement and all attachments (except filing fee) were mailed delivered to All Parties in the trial court (listed) Signature: SCT-B- 2 (rev. 1/18) [email protected] E M E R G E N C Y IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA KEVIN MEYER, in his official ) capacity as the Lieutenant Governor of ) the State of Alaska; GAIL FENUMIAI, ) in her official capacity as the Director ) of the Alaska Division of Elections; ) and the ALASKA DIVISION OF ) ELECTIONS, ) Supreme Court No.: S-_______ ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) ) ARCTIC VILLAGE COUNCIL, ) LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ) ALASKA, ELIZABETH L. JONES, ) and BARBARA CLARK, ) ) Respondents. ) ) Trial Court Case No.: 3AN-20-07858 CI 269-5100 269-5100 ) EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DECISION ON THE STATE’S 907 ( PETITION FOR REVIEW (Appellate Rule 504) PHONE ANCHORAGE BRANCH DEPARTMENT OF LAWDEPARTMENT OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 99501 ALASKA ANCHORAGE, Petitioners, State of Alaska, Division of Elections, Kevin Meyer, and Gail 1031 W. FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 200 SUITE FOURTH AVENUE, 1031 W. OFFICE OFFICE THE ATTORNEY OF GENERAL Fenumiai, make this Emergency Motion for Expedited Decision on their Petition for Review filed today. Expedited action is necessary because this dispute concerns the State’s ability to apply a statutory witness requirement for absentee by-mail ballots in the upcoming general election. Thousands of absentee ballots—with instructions explicitly requiring that the voters have their ballots witnessed—have already been distributed, voters have already begun to cast their ballots, and election day is fast approaching. On October 5, 2020, the superior court granted but did not implement a preliminary injunction directing the Division to suspend the witness requirement and directing the parties to agree to, or separately propose, a public awareness campaign. If this Court were to affirm the superior court’s preliminary injunction, the Division would need to initiate a significant, expedited public awareness campaign to help assure voters are informed that the statute has been suspended and are not misled or confused about the absentee voting process. For example, if the superior court orders any mailings, it will take the Division 7- 10 days to print and mail a postcard to all registered voters. Voters would then need additional time to receive the postcard, act on the information provided by the Division, and vote and return their ballots before next month’s election—all while accounting for the likelihood that mail may be delayed. Additionally, until this Court definitively rules on the matter, there is an ongoing risk that voters might misunderstand the superior 269-5100 269-5100 ) 907 ( court’s ruling—even if it is stayed—and believe that the witness requirement is no PHONE ANCHORAGE BRANCH DEPARTMENT OF LAWDEPARTMENT OF longer in force. If voters submit unwitnessed ballots, and the witness requirement is ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 99501 ALASKA ANCHORAGE, 1031 W. FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 200 SUITE FOURTH AVENUE, 1031 W. OFFICE OFFICE THE ATTORNEY OF GENERAL ultimately upheld by this Court, those voters will be disenfranchised. For these reasons, the State requests that the Court rule by close of business Monday, October 12, 2020. This will minimize the risk of confusion or potential disenfranchisement to voters and allow the Division as much time as possible to education and inform voters about the changes to absentee voting requirements. Counsel for the State has notified counsel for the respondents of the State’s Kevin Meyer, et al. v. Arctic Village Council, et al. Case No. S-_______ Emergency Motion for Expedited Decision on the State’s Petition for Review (Appellate Rule 504) Page 2 of 3 intention to file this emergency motion and the related petition for review. All grounds advanced in support of this motion were submitted to the superior court. This motion is based upon Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure 402 and 504 and supported by the attached affidavit of counsel and written statement of facts. Opposing counsels’ telephone numbers and addresses are: Natalie Landreth Ezra D. Rosenberg Native American Rights Fund Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights 2801 B Street, Suite 401 Under Law Anchorage, Alaska 99501 1500 K Street, NW Suite 900 (907) 276-0680 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 662-8600 Stephen Koteff ACLU of Alaska Foundation Dale E. Ho ACLU of Alaska American Civil Liberties Union 1057 West Fireweed Lane, Suite 207 Foundation, Inc. (New York) Anchorage, AK 99503 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor (907) 263-2007 New York, NY 10004 (212) 519-7866 DATED October 6, 2020. 269-5100 269-5100 ) 907 ( CLYDE “ED” SNIFFEN, JR. ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL PHONE ANCHORAGE BRANCH DEPARTMENT OF LAWDEPARTMENT OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 99501 ALASKA ANCHORAGE, 1031 W. FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 200 SUITE FOURTH AVENUE, 1031 W. OFFICE OFFICE THE ATTORNEY OF GENERAL By: /s/ Laura Fox Laura Fox Assistant Attorney General Alaska Bar No. 0905015 State of Alaska; Department of Law 1031 West Fourth Avenue, Suite 200 Anchorage, AK 99501 (907) 269-5275 Kevin Meyer, et al. v. Arctic Village Council, et al. Case No. S-_______ Emergency Motion for Expedited Decision on the State’s Petition for Review (Appellate Rule 504) Page 3 of 3 [email protected] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA KEVIN MEYER, in his official ) capacity as the Lieutenant Governor of ) the State of Alaska; GAIL FENUMIAI, ) in her official capacity as the Director ) of the Alaska Division of Elections; ) and the ALASKA DIVISION OF ) ELECTIONS, ) Supreme Court No.: S-_______ ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) ) ARCTIC VILLAGE COUNCIL, ) LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ) ALASKA, ELIZABETH L. JONES, ) and BARBARA CLARK, ) ) Respondents. ) ) Trial Court Case No.: 3AN-20-07858 CI WRITTEN STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EXPEDITED ACTION 269-5100 269-5100 ) 907 ( The petitioners, the State of Alaska, Division of Elections, Kevin Meyer, and PHONE ANCHORAGE BRANCH DEPARTMENT OF LAWDEPARTMENT OF Gail Fenumiai (“the State”) provide the following statement of facts in support of this ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 99501 ALASKA ANCHORAGE, 1031 W.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NASS Resolution on Threats of Violence Toward Election Officials and Election Workers
    NASS Resolution on Threats of Violence Toward Election Officials and Election Workers Introduced by Hon. Kyle Ardoin (R-LA) Co-Sponsored for Introduction by: Hon. Kevin Meyer (R-AK) Hon. John Merrill (R-AL) Hon. Jena Griswold (D-CO) Hon. Paul Pate (R-IA) Hon. Scott Schwab (R-KS) Hon. Michael Adams (R-KY) Hon. Jocelyn Benson (D-MI) Hon. Steve Simon (D-MN) Hon. Michael Watson (R-MS) Hon. Al Jaeger (R-ND) Hon. Maggie Toulouse Oliver (D-NM) Hon. Barbara Cegavske (R-NV) Hon. Shemia Fagan (D-OR) Hon. Kim Wyman (R-WA) WHEREAS, the 2020 election cycle was the most challenging in recent memory, with a global pandemic and multiple natural disasters affecting numerous states and their election infrastructure and processes; and WHEREAS, election workers across the country worked tirelessly under difficult conditions to ensure a fair, safe and accurate election for the more than 155 million voters in November; and WHEREAS, based upon unrelenting misinformation and disinformation from both domestic and foreign sources, extremists have taken to threatening and endangering election workers, from Secretaries of State, state election directors, local election officials and election workers; and WHEREAS, the cornerstone of our republic is the right of Americans to vote in a safe, secure and accurate election, and their exercising of that right; and WHEREAS, election workers are a vital part of ensuring the exercise of that right for all eligible Americans; and WHEREAS, violence and violent threats directed at Secretaries of State, their families, staff, and other election workers is abhorrent and the antithesis of what our nation stands for.
    [Show full text]
  • John H. Merrill Secretary of State
    ALABAMA STATE CAPITOL (334) 242-7200 600 DEXTER AVENUE FAX (334) 242-4993 SUITE S-105 WWW.SOS.ALABAMA.GOV MONTGOMERY, AL 36130 [email protected] JOHN H. MERRILL SECRETARY OF STATE February 22, 2021 The Honorable Chuck Schumer The Honorable Mitch McConnell Majority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States Senate 322 Hart S.O.B. 317 Russell S.O.B. Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker of the House Minority Leader of the House House of Representatives House of Representatives 1236 Longworth H.O.B. 2468 Rayburn H.O.B. Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Majority Leader Schumer, Minority Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, and House Minority Leader McCarthy: We are writing you today to urge you to reject the “For the People Act” otherwise known as H.R. 1 or S. 1, which is a dangerous overreach by the federal government into the administration of elections. Each state legislature should have the freedom and flexibility to determine practices that best meet the needs of their respective states. A one-size-fits-all approach mandated by Congress is not the solution to any of our problems. These bills intrude upon our constitutional rights, and further sacrifice the security and integrity of the elections process. We firmly believe the authority to legislate and regulate these changes should be left with the states. H.R. 1 and S. 1 blatantly undermine the extensive work we, as election officials, have completed in order to provide safe, accessible voting options for our constituencies.
    [Show full text]
  • 141097NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. .. ,. .... ... ... • ... 'r .. .., ~~ • -- .. -•• •... --• ""' - • .. .. .. ·r ,.. .. ~ .. ., J' -- ., I - - I . 4" '. • ~ ". ',.. • •~ ~ • ~ 'I -.,,- <.. • - • I. - • --"~ ,'pi.. alaska judicial council 1029 W. Third Avenue, Suite 201, Anchorage, Alaska 99501-1917 (907) 279-2526 FAX (907) 276-5046 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NON-ATIORNEY MEMBERS William T. Cotton Jim A. Arnesen David A. Dapcevich Leona Dkakok ATIORNEY MEMBERS Mark E. Ashburn Daniel L. Callahan Thomas G. Nave CHAIRMAN. EX OFFICIO Daniel A. Moore, Jr. Chief Justice Supreme Court Message From the Executive Director We are pleased to present the Alaska Judicial Council's Sixteenth Report to the Legislature and Supreme Court for the years 1991 and 1992. The Council reports biennially on its dual constitutional responsibilities of nominating candidates for judicial vacancies and of making reports and recommendations to the supreme court and legislature. The report also covers the statutory mandate to evaluate judges standing for retention and applicants for the Public Defender. This report includes a brief narrative section that summarizes Council activities during 1991 and 1992, and a series of appendices. The appendices include a current listing of statutory and constitutional law affecting the Judicial Council, a log of judicial applicants, nominees and appointees, a log of all sitting judges and their retention election dates, and summaries of Council procedures for judicial selection and retention evaluation. Summaries of the Council's major reports during 1991 and 1992 also are included as appendices. The Judicial Council welcomes your comments and questions about this report. Very truly yours, ~;('~ William T. Cotton Executive Director 141097 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures
    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures The Vermont Public Interest Action Project Office of Career Services Vermont Law School Copyright © 2021 Vermont Law School Acknowledgement The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures represents the contributions of several individuals and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for their ideas and energy. We would like to acknowledge and thank the state court administrators, clerks, and other personnel for continuing to provide the information necessary to compile this volume. Likewise, the assistance of career services offices in several jurisdictions is also very much appreciated. Lastly, thank you to Elijah Gleason in our office for gathering and updating the information in this year’s Guide. Quite simply, the 2021-2022 Guide exists because of their efforts, and we are very appreciative of their work on this project. We have made every effort to verify the information that is contained herein, but judges and courts can, and do, alter application deadlines and materials. As a result, if you have any questions about the information listed, please confirm it directly with the individual court involved. It is likely that additional changes will occur in the coming months, which we will monitor and update in the Guide accordingly. We believe The 2021-2022 Guide represents a necessary tool for both career services professionals and law students considering judicial clerkships. We hope that it will prove useful and encourage other efforts to share information of use to all of us in the law school career services community.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Committee 2015-2016 Members
    Ex ecutive Committee 2015-2016 Members As of February 12, 2015 CHAIR CHAIR-ELECT Senator Nancy Todd Representative Jeff Thompson Colorado Idaho VICE CHAIR IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIR Representative Sam Hunt Representative Craig Johnson Washington Alaska ALASKA CALIFORNIA President Kevin Meyer Senator Kevin de Leon President of the Senate Senate President Pro Tempore Senator Berta Gardner Senator Bob Huff Senate Minority Leader Senate Minority Leader Senator Lesil McGuire Speaker Toni Atkins CSG West Past Chair Speaker of the Assembly Senator Gary Stevens Assembly Member Kristin Olsen CSG Immediate Past Chair Assembly Minority Leader CSG Co-Chair, International Committee Speaker Mike Chenault COLORADO Speaker of the House Senator Bill Cadman Representative Craig Johnson President of the Senate CSG West Immediate Past Chair Senator Morgan Carroll Representative Chris Tuck Senate Minority Leader House Minority Leader Senator Mary Hodge Representative Lance Pruitt Chair, CSG West Agriculture and Water Chair, CSG West State and Federal Relations Committee Committee Senator Nancy Todd CSG West Chair ARIZONA Speaker Dickey Lee Hullinghorst President Andy Biggs Speaker of the House President of the Senate Representative Brian DelGrosso Senator Katie Hobbs House Minority Leader Senate Minority Leader Representative Su Ryden Senator Kelli Ward Co-Chair, CSG West Canada Relations Vice Chair, CSG West Health and Human Committee Services Committee Speaker David Gowan Speaker of the House Representative Eric Meyer House Minority Leader CSG West ∙ 1107 9th Street, Suite 730 ∙ Sacramento, CA 95814 ∙ Phone (916) 553-4423 ∙ www.csgwest.org ~ 1 ~ HAWAII Representative Chuck Hunter President Donna Mercado Kim House Minority Leader President of the Senate Representative Kimberly Dudik Senator Sam Slom Vice Chair, CSG West Public Safety Senate Minority Floor Leader Committee Senator Brian T.
    [Show full text]
  • MEET the NATION's NEW SECONDS-IN-COMMAND from the National Lieutenant Governors Association (NLGA)
    Subscribe Past Issues Trans Mark the Dates NOW: Nov. 28 - 30, 2018, in VA; March 27 -29, 2019 in DC; & July 17 - 19, 2019, in Delaware. November 12, 2018 MEET THE NATION'S NEW SECONDS-IN-COMMAND from the National Lieutenant Governors Association (NLGA) The NLGA welcomes 22 new members to the ranks of the seconds-in-command in the states, with at least three additional new members arriving by the new year. The NLGA brings engaged leaders together. All newly elected members are invited to the NLGA Meeting in Alexandria, Virginia, November 28 - 30, 2018. Visit www.nlga.us or contact [email protected] NOW to make arrangements. Registrations are due next Monday. LT. GOVERNOR-ELECT WILL AINSWORTH, ALABAMA (R) Lt. Governor-elect Will Ainsworth served in the State House since 2014. He turned a passion for hunting and fishing into the Dream Ranch, one of the most recognized sportsmen’s lodges in the U.S., and he founded the Tennessee Valley Hunting and Fishing Expo. Elected independently of the Governor. Statutory duties of Alabama lieutenant governor. LT. GOVERNOR-ELECT KEVIN MEYER, ALASKA (R) Lt. Governor-elect Kevin Meyer has a long public service career. He was elected to the Anchorage Assembly, the State House of Representatives, and the Alaska State Senate and held various leadership positions. He is now procurement coordinator for ConocoPhillips. Elected on a ticket with the Governor. Statutory duties of Alaska lieutenant governor. SEC. OF STATE-ELECT STEVE GAYNOR (R) Secretary of State-elect Steve Gaynor is the gubernatorial successor of Arizona. He has owned printing businesses in California, Colorado, and Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ALASKA SUPREME COURT, the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, and RETROACTIVITY Paul E.Mcgreal*
    A TALE OF TWO COURTS: THE ALASKA SUPREME COURT, THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, AND RETROACTIVITY Paul E.McGreal* SINTRODUCTION Whether out of homage to superior wisdom, judicial economy, desire for uniformity, or simple agreement, many state courts look to decisions of the United States Supreme Court for guidance on state constitutional issues or other issues where an analogy from federal law might be helpful. Many state supreme courts, such as the Alaska Supreme Court expressly reserve the power to interpret protections under their state constitutions more broadly than similar protections under the federal Constitution. At times, those courts that faithfully adhere to this republican spirit find sharp division within their ranks.2 Copyright © 1992 by Alaska Law Review * B.A., Williams College, 1989; I.D., Southern Methodist University School of Law, 1992. Law Clerk to the Honorable Warren W. Matthews, Alaska Supreme Court, 1992-93. 1. See Roberts v. State, 458 P.2d 340, 342 (Alaska 1969) ("We are not bound in expounding the Alaska Constitution's Declaration of Rights by the decisions of the United States Supreme Court, past or future, which expound identical or closely similar provisions of the United States Constitution."); Baker v. City of Fairbanks, 471 P.2d 386,402 (Alaska A.2d 793, 800 (N. 1990); the1970) highest ("We court need thenot he stand land."); by idly see andalso passively, State v. Hempele, waiting for576 constitutional direction from Statev. Boland, 800 P.2d 111 1114 319(Wash. S.E.2d 1990); 254, Pool 260 v. (N.C. Superior 1984). Court, 677 P.2d 261, 271 (Ariz.Professor 1984); Lawrence State v.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Acts and Cases for Alaska Tribal Court Jurisdiction
    Key Acts and Cases for Alaska Tribal Court Jurisdiction Item Type Article Authors Fortson, Ryan Citation Fortson, Ryan. (2014). "Key Acts and Cases for Alaska Tribal Court Jurisdiction." Alaska Justice Forum 31(3–4): 12–13 (Fall 2014/Winter 2015). Publisher Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage Download date 01/10/2021 23:45:06 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/6578 12 Alaska Justice Forum 31(3–4), Fall 2014/Winter 2015 Key Acts and Cases for Alaska Tribal Court Jurisdiction Ryan Fortson recognized tribe, that it had not attempted to (1998). This case addressed whether the Alaska Native Claims Settlement reassume jurisdiction under the procedures land selected by Alaska Native corporations Act (ANCSA) (1971). ANCSA resolved set out in ICWA, and that federal law granted through ANCSA constituted Indian country. the outstanding land claims of Alaska Na- Alaska exclusive jurisdiction over custody This status is important because tribes can tives through Congressional action. Prior matters involving Indian children. do things in Indian country normally as- to ANCSA, Alaska Natives held what is Native Village of Venetie I.R.A. Council sociated with sovereign governments, such known as aboriginal title to land in Alaska. v. State of Alaska, 944 F.2d 548 (9th Cir. as tax business conducted on tribal lands Through a series of United States Supreme 1991). In this case, two village councils and exercise criminal jurisdiction. Venetie Court cases dating back to 1823, aboriginal and two individuals who had adopted chil- had tried to collect taxes from the State title was held to mean that Native American dren through tribal courts sued the State and a private contractor for constructing tribes were domestic dependent nations for refusing to recognize the legal validity a school on ANCSA land to which it held that had a right to occupy lands they had of tribal court adoptions by denying the title.
    [Show full text]
  • California Secretary of State Dr. Shirley N. Weber Statement on Signing Bipartisan Letter to CISA Secretary Mayorkas and Acting Director Wales
    SW21:018 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 16, 2021 CONTACT: SOS Press Office (916) 653-6575 California Secretary of State Dr. Shirley N. Weber Statement on Signing Bipartisan Letter to CISA Secretary Mayorkas and Acting Director Wales SACRAMENTO, CA – California Secretary of State Dr. Shirley N. Weber issued the following statement on signing the letter to Department of Homeland Security’s Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) requesting an expansion of federal efforts to combat foreign disinformation. "Democracy exists because we have free and fair elections, and we must protect those elections at all costs. In 2020, our local and state election officials worked tirelessly to combat the spread of mis- and disinformation perpetuated by foreign actors seeking to diminish trust in our elections." "Without CISA's leadership combating this threat at the federal level, we would not be able to call the 2020 General Election the most secure in our nation's history. For this reason, I gladly join my bipartisan colleagues in calling on CISA not only to continue this vital work but expand its efforts to combat the ongoing threat of foreign interference in our elections." The complete letter can be accessed here and is co-signed by Kevin Meyer, Alaska Lt. Governor; Jena Griswold, Colorado Secretary of State; Shenna Bellows, Maine Secretary of State; William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; Jocelyn Benson, Michigan Secretary of State; Maggie Toulouse Oliver, New Mexico Secretary of State; Shemia Fagan, Oregon Secretary of State; Nellie Gorbea, Rhode Island Secretary of State; Jim Condos, Vermont Secretary of State, and Kim Wyman, Washington Secretary of State.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Mischief
    Alaska Criminal Code Revision — Tentative Draft, Part 4: Conspiracy; Criminal Mischief; Business and Commercial Offenses; Escape and Related Offenses; Offenses Relating to Judicial and Other Proceedings; Obstruction of Public Administration; Prostitution; Gambling Item Type Report Authors Alaska Criminal Code Revision Subcommission Citation Alaska Criminal Code Revision Subcommission. (1977). Alaska Criminal Code Revision — Tentative Draft, Part 4: Conspiracy; Criminal Mischief; Business and Commercial Offenses; Escape and Related Offenses; Offenses Relating to Judicial and Other Proceedings; Obstruction of Public Administration; Prostitution; Gambling. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Criminal Code Revision Subcommission. Publisher Alaska Criminal Code Revision Subcommission Download date 06/10/2021 06:00:16 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/10752 Scholarworks@UA — UAA Justice Center July 1977 Alaska Criminal Code Revision — Tentative Draft, Part 4: Conspiracy; Criminal Mischief; Business and Commercial Offenses; Escape and Related Offenses; Offenses Relating to Judicial and Other Proceedings; Obstruction of Public Administration; Prostitution; Gambling Alaska Criminal Code Revision Subcommission Suggested citation Alaska Criminal Code Revision Subcommission. (1977). Alaska Criminal Code Revision — Tentative Draft, Part 4: Conspiracy; Criminal Mischief; Business and Commercial Offenses; Escape and Related Offenses; Offenses Relating to Judicial and Other Proceedings; Obstruction of Public Administration; Prostitution; Gambling. Anchorage,
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Supreme Court MO&J No Sm-1741
    NOTICE Memorandum decisions of this court do not create legal precedent. A party wishing to cite such a decision in a brief or at oral argument should review Alaska Appellate Rule 214(d). THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA MICHAELA ROBINSON and ELIAS ) ROBINSON, ) Supreme Court No. S-17140 ) Appellants, ) Superior Court No. 3AN-16-09559 ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND JUDGMENT* STATE OF ALASKA, DEPARTMENT ) OF HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES, ) No. 1741 – September 18, 2019 DIVISION OF SENIOR & ) DISABILITIES SERVICES, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court of the State of Alaska, Third Judicial District, Anchorage, Pamela Scott Washington, Judge pro tem. Appearances: Michaela and Elias Robinson, pro se, Anchorage, Appellants. Anna Jay, Assistant Attorney General, Anchorage, and Kevin G. Clarkson, Attorney General, Juneau, for Appellee. Before: Bolger, Chief Justice, Winfree, Stowers, Maassen, and Carney, Justices. Michaela and Elias Robinson, appearing unrepresented, appeal from the Anchorage Superior Court’s dismissal of their claims against the Alaska Division of Senior and Disabilities Services in a long-running dispute over Michaela’s Medicaid * Entered under Alaska Appellate Rule 214. Personal Care Assistance (PCA) services. Michaela was the only plaintiff in the original complaint, but the superior court later granted her motion to join Elias as a co-plaintiff. The superior court only considered the claims raised in Michaela’s original complaint, disregarding several claims raised in her and Elias’s later filings. By doing so the court left several of the Robinsons’ claims unaddressed, and we remand so that they may be resolved. A. The Superior Court Did Not Consider The Robinsons’ Claim About Pre-2016 Benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Conspiracy: What's the Use?
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 54 Number 1 Article 2 10-1-1999 Civil Conspiracy: What's the Use? Thomas J. Leach Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended Citation Thomas J. Leach, Civil Conspiracy: What's the Use?, 54 U. Miami L. Rev. 1 (1999) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol54/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University of Miami Law Review VOLUME 54 OCTOBER 1999 NUMBER 1 Civil Conspiracy: What's the Use? THOMAS J. LEACH* I. INTRODUCTION Any lawyer, given a few moments to think about it, could offer a reasonably correct definition of civil conspiracy. She would say it involves an agreement or combination. Extrapolating from the criminal context, she would probably formulate a phrase to convey the object of the agreement: something like "to do an unlawful act." If pressed for explanation, she would probably come to the point of realizing that the "unlawful act" is most likely to be a recognized tort. She might refine the definition in light of the requirement of an "agreement," which imports intent, to confine the applicability to intentional torts. Such a definition of civil conspiracy satisfactorily matches the usual formulation found in the cases and texts: "The essence of conspir- acy is an agreement - together with an overt act - to do an unlawful act, or a lawful act in an unlawful manner."' * Associate Professor of Law, University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law.
    [Show full text]