Factors Required for the Successful Aquaculture of Black Bream In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Factors Required for the Successful Aquaculture of Black Bream In Determination of the biological parameters required for managing the fisheries of four tuskfish species and western yellowfin bream Fairclough, D. V., Hesp S. A., Potter, I. C. & N. G. Hall Project No. 2000/137 Fisheries Research and Development Corporation Report FRDC project 2000/137 Determination of the biological parameters required for managing the fisheries of four tuskfish species and western yellowfin bream Fairclough D.V. Hesp S.A. Potter I.C. Hall N.G. June 2004 Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research Murdoch University Murdoch, Western Australia 6150 This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. June 2004 ISBN: 0-646-39851-2 2 Table of Contents NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY:............................................................................................6 OUTCOMES ACHIEVED TO DATE .......................................................................................6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................................9 1.0 GENERAL INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................10 1.1 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................10 1.2 NEED.....................................................................................................................13 1.3 OBJECTIVES........................................................................................................14 1.4 ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVES..............................................................................14 2.0 GENERAL MATERIALS AND METHODS................................................................15 2.1 STUDY AREAS....................................................................................................15 2.2 SAMPLING REGIME ..........................................................................................17 2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS...........................................................18 2.4 FISH MEASUREMENTS.....................................................................................19 2.5 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY..............................................................................19 2.6 AGE AND GROWTH...........................................................................................21 3.0 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF ACANTHOPAGRUS LATUS ...............................23 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................23 3.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ..........................................................................25 3.2.1 Hermaphroditism of Acanthopagrus latus.............................................................25 3.2.2 Potential annual fecundity.....................................................................................27 3.2.3 Biomass and egg per recruit analysis....................................................................28 3.3 RESULTS..............................................................................................................29 3.3.1 Macroscopic and histological observations of gonad tissues ...............................29 3.3.2 Seasonal changes in gonadal categories with increasing length and age ............33 3.3.3 Proportions of juveniles, males and females immediately prior to and during the spawning period ....................................................................................................37 3.3.4 Reproductive variables..........................................................................................40 3.3.5 Fecundity ...............................................................................................................43 3.3.6 Spawning biomass per recruit ...............................................................................45 3.4 DISCUSSION........................................................................................................47 3.4.1 Acanthopagrus latus is a protandrous hermaphrodite ..........................................47 3.4.2 Aspects of spawning and estimates of fecundity....................................................49 3.4.3 Implications for management ................................................................................50 4.0 AGE AND SIZE COMPOSITIONS, GROWTH, MORTALITY AND HABITATS OF ACANTHOPAGRUS LATUS.....................................................................................52 4.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................52 4.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ..........................................................................54 4.2.1 Natural mortality ...................................................................................................54 4.2.2 Total mortality .......................................................................................................55 4.2.3 Integrating the separate mortality estimates.........................................................58 4.3 RESULTS..............................................................................................................60 4.3.1 Comparisons between the number of opaque zones on whole and sectioned otoliths ...................................................................................................................60 4.3.2 Validation that opaque zones are formed annually...............................................60 4.3.3 Length-frequency distributions of the different age classes ..................................62 4.3.4 Length-frequency distributions in different habitats .............................................62 4.3.5 Growth of Acanthopagrus latus .............................................................................65 4.3.6 Mortality estimates and year class strengths ........................................................65 3 4.4 DISCUSSION........................................................................................................72 4.4.1 Age and growth of Acanthopagrus latus................................................................72 4.4.2 Estimates of mortality............................................................................................73 5.0 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE FOUR TUSKFISH SPECIES ....................76 5.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................76 5.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ..........................................................................79 5.2.1 Hermaphroditism of the four species of tuskfish..........................................................79 5.2.2 Lengths and ages at sexual maturity and sex change............................................80 5.2.3 Fecundity ...............................................................................................................81 5.3 RESULTS..............................................................................................................83 5.3.1 Histological evidence for hermaphroditism ..........................................................83 5.3.2 Sex ratios ...............................................................................................................85 5.3.3 Reproductive variables..........................................................................................87 5.3.4 Lengths and ages at maturity and sex change.......................................................94 5.3.5 Fecundity .............................................................................................................103 5.4 DISCUSSION......................................................................................................107 5.4.1 Evidence for hermaphroditism ............................................................................107 5.4.2 Spawning periods ................................................................................................108 5.4.3 Lengths and ages at maturity...............................................................................109 5.4.4 Comparisons between Choerodon rubescens in Shark Bay and the Abrolhos Islands..................................................................................................................110 5.4.5 Fecundity .............................................................................................................111 5.4.6 Management implications....................................................................................112 6.0 AGE COMPOSITIONS AND GROWTH OF THE FOUR TUSKFISH SPECIES 113 6.1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................113 6.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ........................................................................114 6.3 RESULTS............................................................................................................114 6.3.1 Length-weight relationships ................................................................................114 6.3.2 Validation of annual growth zone formation in otoliths and determination of birth dates.....................................................................................................................115
Recommended publications
  • Stock Status of Queensland's Fisheries Resources 2009–10
    Stock status of Queensland’s Fisheries Queensland fisheries resources 2009–10 Employment, Development Economic Innovation and Department of Tomorrow’s Queensland: strong, green, smart, healthy and fair Stock status of Queensland’s fisheries resources 2009–10 PR10–5184 © The State of Queensland, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, 2010. Except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of the work may in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or any other means be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or be broadcast or transmitted without the prior written permission of the Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The copyright owner shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Enquiries about reproduction, including downloading or printing the web version, should be directed to [email protected] or telephone +61 7 3225 1398. Contents Acronyms 6 Fishery acronyms 6 Introduction 7 Stock status process 7 Stock status assessment 2009–10 8 Stocks with no assessment made 16 Stock background and status determination 17 Barramundi (Lates calcarifer) EC 18 Barramundi (Lates calcarifer) GOC 19 Bream–yellowfin (Acanthopagrus australis) EC 20 Bugs–Balmain (Ibacus chacei and I. brucei) EC 21 Bugs–Moreton Bay (Thenus australiensis & T. parindicus) EC 22 Cobia (Rachycentron canadum) EC 23 Coral trout (Plectropomus spp. and Variola spp.) EC 24 Crab–blue swimmer (Portunus pelagius) EC 25 Crab–mud (Scylla spp.) EC 26 Crab–mud (Scylla spp.) GOC 27 Crab–spanner (Ranina ranina) EC 28 Eel (Anguilla australis and A.
    [Show full text]
  • Oyster Farms Are the Main Spawning Grounds of the Black Sea Bream Acanthopagrus Schlegelii in Hiroshima Bay, Japan
    Oyster farms are the main spawning grounds of the black sea bream Acanthopagrus schlegelii in Hiroshima Bay, Japan Kentaro Kawai, Hiroki Fujita, Gustavo Sanchez and Tetsuya Umino Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University, Higashi Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan ABSTRACT Understanding the anthropogenic impact of oyster farms is essential for the management and conservation of marine fishes. In Japan, Hiroshima Bay is the region with the most intense oyster farming and thus suitable to study the impact of these farms. Here, we surveyed spherical planktonic eggs of the black sea bream Acanthopagrus schlegelii, one of the most abundant fish in the Bay. Our survey was performed at fourteen stations which included places with oyster farms and historical spawning grounds. We found the highest egg densities in four stations, one with historical spawning aggregations and three with major oyster farms. Besides, surveys at the innermost part of Hiroshima Bay, where two major rivers discharge, showed a low density of eggs indicating that black sea bream avoids spawning in low salinity areas. Our study suggests that oyster farms benefit spawners of black sea bream by providing more food sources than historical spawning grounds for efficient spawning. Yet, whether oyster farms represent a full advantage for the species remains unclear, particularly because they are known to host jellyfishes that prey on eggs and limit water flow that can influence the survival of fish eggs. Subjects Agricultural Science, Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science, Ecology, Marine Biology, Submitted 8 February 2021 Accepted 26 April 2021 Zoology Published 1 June 2021 Keywords Shellfish aquaculture, Fish spawning, Sparid, Anthropogenic impact, Fish eggs Corresponding author Tetsuya Umino, INTRODUCTION [email protected] Hiroshima Bay is an enclosed bay in the western Seto Inland Sea of Japan with an average Academic editor seabed depth of 25.6 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Protozoan Parasites Recorded in Australia Peter J. O
    1 CATALOGUE OF PROTOZOAN PARASITES RECORDED IN AUSTRALIA PETER J. O’DONOGHUE & ROBERT D. ADLARD O’Donoghue, P.J. & Adlard, R.D. 2000 02 29: Catalogue of protozoan parasites recorded in Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45(1):1-164. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. Published reports of protozoan species from Australian animals have been compiled into a host- parasite checklist, a parasite-host checklist and a cross-referenced bibliography. Protozoa listed include parasites, commensals and symbionts but free-living species have been excluded. Over 590 protozoan species are listed including amoebae, flagellates, ciliates and ‘sporozoa’ (the latter comprising apicomplexans, microsporans, myxozoans, haplosporidians and paramyxeans). Organisms are recorded in association with some 520 hosts including mammals, marsupials, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates. Information has been abstracted from over 1,270 scientific publications predating 1999 and all records include taxonomic authorities, synonyms, common names, sites of infection within hosts and geographic locations. Protozoa, parasite checklist, host checklist, bibliography, Australia. Peter J. O’Donoghue, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia; Robert D. Adlard, Protozoa Section, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia; 31 January 2000. CONTENTS the literature for reports relevant to contemporary studies. Such problems could be avoided if all previous HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST 5 records were consolidated into a single database. Most Mammals 5 researchers currently avail themselves of various Reptiles 21 electronic database and abstracting services but none Amphibians 26 include literature published earlier than 1985 and not all Birds 34 journal titles are covered in their databases. Fish 44 Invertebrates 54 Several catalogues of parasites in Australian PARASITE-HOST CHECKLIST 63 hosts have previously been published.
    [Show full text]
  • M 12001 Supplement
    The following supplement accompanies the article Biological mechanisms of marine invasions Katherine J. Papacostas, Elizabeth W. Rielly-Carroll, Samuel E. Georgian, Dustin J. Long, Sarah D. Princiotta, Andrea M. Quattrini, Kim E. Reuter, Amy L. Freestone* *Corresponding author: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 565: 251–268 (2017) Table S1: Search parameters used in ISI Web of Science. General search terms used for all mechanisms were (non-native* OR nonnative* OR invasi* OR introduc* OR non-indigenous OR nonindigenous OR alien OR exotic OR invade*) AND (estuar* OR marine OR coastal OR ocean* OR sea OR *tidal), followed by mechanism-specific terms outlined below. Search results were then refined using Web of Science tools to those pertaining only to Marine and Freshwater Biology, and all research areas that were clearly not relevant (e.g., not biological) were excluded. All remaining papers were then individually evaluated for relevance. Over 2500 papers were evaluated for negative interactions alone. Mechanism Search terms Negative Interactions AND (“biotic resistance” OR “invasion resistance” OR diversity OR “diversity invasibility” OR “empty niche*” OR “limiting similarity” OR “Darwin’s naturalization” OR pre-adaptation OR “enemy release” OR “enemy escape” OR “natural enem*” OR “native enem*” OR allelopath* OR “chemical defense*” OR “novel weapon*” OR “novel chemical*” OR predat* OR herbivor* OR parasit* OR compet* OR consum*) Positive Interactions AND (meltdown OR facilitat* OR mutual* OR “positive interact*”
    [Show full text]
  • Restocking the Blackwood River Estuary with the Black Bream Acanthopagrus Butcheri Project No. 2000/180
    Restocking the Blackwood River Estuary with the Black Bream Acanthopagrus butcheri Jenkins, G.I., French, D.J.W., Potter, I.C., de Lestang, S., Hall, N.G., Partridge, G.J., Hesp, S.A. and Sarre, G.A. Project No. 2000/180 Fisheries Research and Development Corporation Report FRDC Project 2000/180 Restocking the Blackwood River Estuary with the Black Bream Acanthopagrus butcheri. Jenkins, G.I. # French, D.J.W.* Potter, I.C. * de Lestang, S.* Hall, N.* Partridge, G.J. # Hesp, S.A. * Sarre, G.A. * June 2006 #Aquaculture Development Unit WA Maritime Training Centre, Challenger TAFE 1 Fleet Street, Fremantle, Western Australia, 6160 *Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology Murdoch University Murdoch, Western Australia 6150 This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. June 2006 ISBN: 86905-8932 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................................2 OBJECTIVES................................................................................................................................................3 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY.................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Biology, Stock Status and Management Summaries for Selected Fish Species in South-Western Australia
    Fisheries Research Report No. 242, 2013 Biology, stock status and management summaries for selected fish species in south-western Australia Claire B. Smallwood, S. Alex Hesp and Lynnath E. Beckley Fisheries Research Division Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories PO Box 20 NORTH BEACH, Western Australia 6920 Correct citation: Smallwood, C. B.; Hesp, S. A.; and Beckley, L. E. 2013. Biology, stock status and management summaries for selected fish species in south-western Australia. Fisheries Research Report No. 242. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. 180pp. Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Fisheries Western Australia. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Department of Fisheries Western Australia does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Fish illustrations Illustrations © R. Swainston / www.anima.net.au We dedicate this guide to the memory of our friend and colleague, Ben Chuwen Department of Fisheries 3rd floor SGIO Atrium 168 – 170 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Telephone: (08) 9482 7333 Facsimile: (08) 9482 7389 Website: www.fish.wa.gov.au ABN: 55 689 794 771 Published by Department of Fisheries, Perth, Western Australia. Fisheries Research Report No. 242, March 2013. ISSN: 1035 - 4549 ISBN: 978-1-921845-56-7 ii Fisheries Research Report No.242, 2013 Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of the Black Bream Acanthopagrus Butcheri (Pisces: Sparidae) Population in Lake Clifton, South-Western Australia
    Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 94: 25–28, 2011 The status of the black bream Acanthopagrus butcheri (Pisces: Sparidae) population in Lake Clifton, south-western Australia K A Smith & J Norriss Department of Fisheries, P.O. Box 21, North Beach, 6020, Australia. Corresponding author: [email protected] Manuscript received August 2010; accepted December 2010 Abstract Lake Clifton hosts the largest living, non-marine thrombolite (microbialite) reef in the southern hemisphere. The thrombolite reef was recently listed as a critically endangered ecological community. The main threat to the ecology of the lake is increasing salinity, but other threats have also been identified, including the impact of the introduced fish Acanthopagrus butcheri (Munro, 1949). Samples opportunistically collected after a fish kill in 2007 indicated that A. butcheri in this lake experienced very low somatic growth and recruitment failure between 1995 and 2007, probably in response to hypersalinity. The evidence suggests that the A. butcheri population in Lake Clifton is effectively extinct. The proposed conservation strategy for Lake Clifton addresses a range of identified threats, including the eradication of A. butcheri. However, management action in response to this particular threat may no longer be required. The abundance of A. butcheri in the lake is probably very low and the population is likely to become extinct if current environmental trends continue. A dramatic reduction in growth rate after 1995 demonstrates the extraordinary growth plasticity of A. butcheri in response to environmental influences. Keywords: salinity, fish kill, growth, Sparidae, thrombolite Introduction 1987). Hence, a shift from permanently hyposaline to permanently hypersaline conditions threatens the Lake Clifton is a small, permanently closed, coastal survival of the key microbial species responsible for lake on the south-west coast of Western Australia, thrombolite formation.
    [Show full text]
  • ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List February 2007 Sorted on Scientific Name
    ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List Sorted on Scientific Name February 2007 Scientific name English Name French name Spanish Name Code Abalistes stellaris (Bloch & Schneider 1801) Starry triggerfish AJS Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky 1855) Chinese false gudgeon ABB Ablabys binotatus (Peters 1855) Redskinfish ABW Ablennes hians (Valenciennes 1846) Flat needlefish Orphie plate Agujón sable BAF Aborichthys elongatus Hora 1921 ABE Abralia andamanika Goodrich 1898 BLK Abralia veranyi (Rüppell 1844) Verany's enope squid Encornet de Verany Enoploluria de Verany BLJ Abraliopsis pfefferi (Verany 1837) Pfeffer's enope squid Encornet de Pfeffer Enoploluria de Pfeffer BJF Abramis brama (Linnaeus 1758) Freshwater bream Brème d'eau douce Brema común FBM Abramis spp Freshwater breams nei Brèmes d'eau douce nca Bremas nep FBR Abramites eques (Steindachner 1878) ABQ Abudefduf luridus (Cuvier 1830) Canary damsel AUU Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus 1758) Sergeant-major ABU Abyssobrotula galatheae Nielsen 1977 OAG Abyssocottus elochini Taliev 1955 AEZ Abythites lepidogenys (Smith & Radcliffe 1913) AHD Acanella spp Branched bamboo coral KQL Acanthacaris caeca (A. Milne Edwards 1881) Atlantic deep-sea lobster Langoustine arganelle Cigala de fondo NTK Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate 1888 Prickly deep-sea lobster Langoustine spinuleuse Cigala raspa NHI Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi 1861) Blackbrow bleak AHL Acanthaphritis barbata (Okamura & Kishida 1963) NHT Acantharchus pomotis (Baird 1855) Mud sunfish AKP Acanthaxius caespitosa (Squires 1979) Deepwater mud lobster Langouste
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowfin Bream (Acanthopagrus Australis)
    I & I NSW WILD FISHERIES RESEARCH PROGRAM Yellowfin Bream (Acanthopagrus australis) EXPLOITATION STATUS FULLY FISHED The yellowfin bream has a long history of stability of both the length composition and commercial catch rate data. The species is the basis of very significant recreational and commercial fisheries in NSW. SCIENTIFIC NAME STANDARD NAME COMMENT Acanthopagrus australis yellowfin bream Majority of landings. Acanthopagrus australis Image © Bernard Yau Background reefs. Yellowfin bream grow slowly, taking about 5 years to reach 23 cm fork length (FL). Yellowfin bream (Acanthopagrus australis) are They mature at around 22 cm and appear to endemic to Australia and occur from Townsville undertake extensive pre-spawning migrations. in Queensland to the Gippsland lakes in Maximum length is about 55 cm FL and Victoria. In NSW waters, yellowfin bream are maximum weight about 3.7 kg. Adults may found primarily within estuaries and along return to estuarine waters after spawning. nearshore beaches and rocky reefs, although they also occur within the lower freshwater The majority of bream taken in the Estuary reaches of coastal rivers. Within estuaries, General Fishery are caught in mesh and hauling yellowfin bream are found in association with nets with a smaller number taken in fish traps. all types of habitat, including seagrass beds, The highest commercial catches of bream occur mangroves, bare substrates and rocky reefs. in autumn and winter. Yellowfin bream are also They eat a wide variety of foods, including small taken in very large quantities by recreational fish, molluscs, crustaceans and worms. fishers and recreational landings are estimated to be about double commercial landings.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Conservation Advice for Posidonia Australis Seagrass
    1 Posidonia australis seagrass meadows of the Manning – Hawkesbury ecoregion 2 3 1. Description of the ecological community 4 1.1 Name of the ecological community 5 This advice follows the assessment of a public nomination to list the ‘Posidonia australis 6 seagrass beds’ as a threatened ecological community under the EPBC Act. 7 8 Posidonia australis is a sub-tidal meadow-forming seagrass species. The northernmost limit to 9 the distribution of P. australis on the east coast of Australia is Wallis Lake. Its distribution then 10 extends around the southern half of Australia to Shark Bay on the west coast encompassing 11 significant ecological and biogeographic variation. Given the close links between biodiversity 12 and the underlying abiotic drivers, the definition of the ecological community has been focused 13 on the assemblage of plants, animals and micro-organisms associated with seagrass meadows 14 dominated by Posidonia australis occurring in the temperate Manning Shelf and Hawkesbury 15 Shelf bioregions (IMCRA v4.01). Spalding et al. (2007) consider the Manning Shelf and 16 Hawkesbury Shelf bioregions to be a single ecoregion based on relative homogeneous species 17 composition and clear distinction from adjacent systems. 18 19 It is recommended that the ecological community be named Posidonia australis seagrass 20 meadows of the Manning-Hawkesbury ecoregion (hereafter referred to as the ecological 21 community). The name best describes the dominant component, structure and location 22 characterising the ecological community. 23 24 1.2 Location and physical environment 25 The ecological community occurs mostly within the sheltered environments of permanently 26 open estuaries along the warm temperate New South Wales coastline, from Wallis Lake (32°S) 27 to Port Hacking (34°S).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Life History Characteristics of Black Bream, Acanthopagrus Butcheri, in Tasmanian Estuarine Ecosystems
    Ecology and Life History Characteristics of Black Bream, Acanthopagrus butcheri, in Tasmanian Estuarine Ecosystems Ryuji Sakabe B.Sc Hons Submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2009 School of Zoology Tasmanian Aquaculture & Fisheries Institute University of Tasmania DECLARATION I hereby declare that this thesis is my own work, except where due acknowledgement is given, and that the material presented here has not been submitted at another university for the award of any other degree or diploma. Ryuji Sakabe Date 9.70 , STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY OF ACCESS This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Ryuji Sakabe Date III IV ABSTRACT Estuaries are characterised by high biological productivity associated with relatively variable environmental conditions. Estuarine dependent fish fauna must cope with such variability and typically exhibit a range of life history adaptations in conjunction with migratory capabilities, to make use of a range of habitats throughout their life time. Their utilisation of these habitats is known to vary at a number of temporal scales, including tide, diurnal, seasonal and life history stage. Studies of the interrelationships between estuarine dependent fauna and environmental conditions have attracted much attention because of the physiological and/or behavioral adaptations to the unstable environment. The black bream, Acanthopagrus butcheri, is an estuarine resident species that completes its whole life cycle within an estuary. It occurs extensively in temperate estuarine waters in southern Australia. This species is the subject of major recreational and commercial fisheries throughout its distributional range and has been the subject of several studies on mainland Australia, though very little work has been conducted in Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Stock Assessments of Bream, Whiting and Flathead (Acanthopagrus Australis, Sillago Ciliata and Platycephalus Fuscus) in South East Queensland
    Department of Agriculture and Fisheries Stock assessments of bream, whiting and flathead (Acanthopagrus australis, Sillago ciliata and Platycephalus fuscus) in South East Queensland April 2019 This publication has been compiled by George M. Leigh1, Wen-Hsi Yang2, Michael F. O’Neill3, Jason G. McGilvray4 and Joanne Wortmann3 for the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries. It provides assessments of the status of south east Queensland’s populations of yellowfin bream, sand whiting and dusky flathead, three of Australia’s most commonly fished species. 1Agri-Science Queensland, Floor 5, 41 George Street, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia 2Centre for Applications in Natural Resource Mathematics (CARM), School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia 3Agri-Science Queensland, Maroochy Research Facility, 47 Mayers Road, Nambour, Queensland 4560, Australia 4Fisheries Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Level 1A East, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Park, Queensland 4102, Australia © The State of Queensland, 2019 Cover photos: Yellowfin bream Acanthopagrus australis, sand whiting Sillago ciliata and dusky flathead Platycephalus fuscus (source: John Turnbull, Creative Commons by Attribution, Non-commercial, Share-alike licence). The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons by Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated.
    [Show full text]