Replacing the RAAF F/A-18 Hornet Fighter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Replacing the RAAF F/A-18 Hornet Fighter Replacing the RAAF F/A-18 Hornet Fighter Strategic, Operational and Technical Issues Carlo Kopp Defence Analyst Submission to the Minister of Defence Parliament House, Canberra May, 1998 UNCLASSIFIED - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE -2- © 1998, C. Kopp [Release] "qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum" De Re Militari, Flavius Vegetius Renatus, Fourth Century A.D. UNCLASSIFIED - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Drawings -3- © 1998, C. Kopp [Release] Sukhoi Su-30K/MK/MKI/37 TNI-AU TNI-AU 11 TNI-AU 08 (C) 1997, Carlo Kopp Drawing 1. Sukhoi Su-30MK/MKI Tactical Fighter The Sukhoi Su-27P/S, Su-30M/MK/MKI, and Su-35/37 family of fighters represent the Soviet/Russian capability response to the US developed F-15A/C and F-15E Eagle fight- ers. Employing vortex lift techniques, these aircraft are unsurpassed in sustained and instantaneous close in manoeuvre capability, while offering 1000 NMI class unrefuelled combat radius and a respectable Beyond Visual Range radar and missile capability. The PLA-AF intend to deploy in excess of 350 such aircraft, and the IAF may deploy as many as 200 aircraft in time. The type is also operated by Vietnam and was ordered by Indone- sia prior to its economic collapse. Depicted is an aircraft in Indonesian TNI-AU colours. UNCLASSIFIED - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Drawings -4- © 1998, C. Kopp [Release] 23 A21-23 Drawing 2. RAAF/Boeing F/A-18A+ Hornet Tactical Fighter Deployed during the eighties, the Boeing (MDC) F/A-18A+ Hornet is the ADF’s princi- pal air superiority asset, which also has a respectable maritime and theatre strike capabil- ity. A capable and flexible second tier multirole fighter, the Hornet has now become marginally competitive with the large scale deployment of first tier Russian Sukhoi Su-27 and Su-30 fighters in the broader region. The RAAF’s 72 F/A-18A aircraft are to be equipped with the Matra-BAe AIM-132 ASRAAM and the Raytheon/Hughes AIM-120B air-to-air missiles under AIR 5400. UNCLASSIFIED - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Drawings -5- © 1998, C. Kopp [Release] A8-129 (c) 1997, Carlo Kopp RAAF F/RF-111C AUP 129129 Drawing 3. RAAF/GD F-111C Strike Aircraft UNCLASSIFIED - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Drawings -6- © 1998, C. Kopp [Release] Size Comparison- Su-30MK, F/A-18A and F-111C Drawing 4. Relative Size Comparison - Su-30MK, F/A-18A, F-111C UNCLASSIFIED - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Drawings -7- © 1998, C. Kopp [Release] Table of Contents Executive Summary....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........9 Notes....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........11 Author Background....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........12 Section 1 The Strategic Context.... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........13 1.1 Historical Perspective on Existing RAAF Force Structure.. ........ ........ ........ ........ ........13 1.2 Historical Perspective on Regional Capabilities ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........18 1.2.1 Fighter, Strike and Multirole Capabilities......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........18 1.2.2 Surface Based Air Defence Capabilities.. ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........24 1.3 Projected Regional Flanker Deployments ........... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........26 1.4 The Projected Strategic Context ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........28 Section 2 Technical and Operational Issues ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........32 2.1 Recent Technological Trends in Fighter Development ................ ........ ........ ........ ........32 2.1.1 Radar Issues.... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........33 2.1.2 Electronic Warfare Systems .... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........36 2.1.3 Optical Sensors....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........38 2.1.4 Cockpits and Computers......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........39 2.1.5 Propulsion ...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........40 2.1.6 Airframes........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........41 2.1.7 Air to Air Weapons ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........47 2.1.8 Air to Ground Weapons .......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........48 2.1.9 Stealth Issues.. ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........51 2.1.9.1 Stealth In Strike Warfare .............. ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........52 2.1.9.2 Stealth In Air Combat .. ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........56 2.1.9.3 Technical Issues in Stealth ... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........59 Section 3 Capability Issues.... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........63 3.1 The Sukhoi Su-27/30/35/37 Flanker Family of Fighters ..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........63 UNCLASSIFIED - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Contents -8- © 1998, C. Kopp [Release] 3.1.1 Airframe and Propulsion......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........65 3.1.2 Cockpit... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........66 3.1.3 Radar and IRS&T ... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........67 3.1.4 Electronic Warfare .......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........67 3.1.5 Weapons ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........68 3.1.6 Performance ... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........69 3.2.1 The Sukhoi Su-27P/PU/PK/UB Flanker .......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........70 3.2.2 The Sukhoi Su-27S/SK and Su-27K/Su-33 Flanker ......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........70 3.2.3 The Sukhoi Su-30/30K, Su-30M/MK and Su-30MKI Flanker ......... ........ ........ ........70 3.2.4 The Sukhoi Su-27M and Su-35 Flanker .......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........70 3.2.5 The Sukhoi Su-37 Flanker ............... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........70 3.2.6 The Sukhoi Su-27IB and Su-32FN, Su-34 ...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........71 3.2.7 Advanced Munitions for the Flanker .............. ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........71 3.3 Advanced Russian Fighter Projects.... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........73 3.4 Capability Issues in the Hornet Replacement ..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........74 Section 4 Replacement Strategy.... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........81 4.1 Rationale ... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........81 4.1.1 Role Spectrum......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........82 4.1.2 Type Capabilities and Availability ........... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........84 4.2 Strategy ............. ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........91 4.3 Specific Recommendations......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........94 4.3.1 Balancing The Hi-Lo Mix and Stretching Existing Assets....... ........ ........ ........ ........94 4.3.2 F/A-18A Hornet...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........95 4.3.3 F-111...... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........96 Section 5 Summary......... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........98 Section 6 F-22 Technical Data ....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........100 UNCLASSIFIED - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Executive Summary -9- © 1998, C. Kopp [Release] Executive Summary The last decade has seen a significant increase in the number of modern combat aircraft acquired in the nearer and broader region. The most important acquisitions have been variants of the capable Russian built Sukhoi Flanker aircraft. Current projections, based upon existing orders, indicate that in excess
Recommended publications
  • Air Power and National Security[INITIAL].P65
    AIR POWER AND NATIONAL SECURITY Indian Air Force: Evolution, Growth and Future AIR POWER AND NATIONAL SECURITY Indian Air Force: Evolution, Growth and Future Air Commodore Ramesh V. Phadke (Retd.) INSTITUTE FOR DEFENCE STUDIES & ANALYSES NEW DELHI PENTAGON PRESS Air Power and National Security: Indian Air Force: Evolution, Growth and Future Air Commodore Ramesh V. Phadke (Retd.) First Published in 2015 Copyright © Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi ISBN 978-81-8274-840-8 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without first obtaining written permission of the copyright owner. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this book are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, or the Government of India. Published by PENTAGON PRESS 206, Peacock Lane, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi-110049 Phones: 011-64706243, 26491568 Telefax: 011-26490600 email: [email protected] website: www.pentagonpress.in Branch Flat No.213, Athena-2, Clover Acropolis, Viman Nagar, Pune-411014 Email: [email protected] In association with Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses No. 1, Development Enclave, New Delhi-110010 Phone: +91-11-26717983 Website: www.idsa.in Printed at Avantika Printers Private Limited. This book is dedicated to the memory of my parents, Shri V.V. Phadke and Shrimati Vimal Phadke, My in-laws, Brig. G.S. Sidhu, AVSM and Mrs. Pritam Sidhu, Late Flg. Offr. Harita Deol, my niece, who died in an Avro accident on December 24, 1996, Late Flt.
    [Show full text]
  • Arms Sales Notification AGENCY: Department
    This document is scheduled to be published in the 1 Federal Register on 02/05/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-02264, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary [Transmittal No. 15-52] 36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated July 21, 1996. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah A. Ragan or Heather N. Harwell, DSCA/LMO, (703) 604-1546/ (703) 607-5339. The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 15-52 with attached Policy Justification and Sensitivity of Technology. Dated: February 2, 2016. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 2 3 Transmittal No. 15-52 Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended (i) Prospective Purchaser: Government of Iraq (GoI) (ii) Total Estimated Value: Major Defense Equipment* $ .550 billion Other $1.400 billion TOTAL $1.950 billion (iii) Description and Quantity or Quantities of Articles or Services under Consideration for Purchase: provides additional weapons, munitions, equipment, and logistics support for F-16 aircraft. Major Defense Equipment (MDE) includes: Twenty (20) each Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) Twenty-four (24) each AIM-9M Sidewinder missile One hundred and fifty (150) each AGM-65D/G/H/K Maverick missile Fourteen thousand one hundred and twenty (14,120) each 500-lb General Purpose (GP) bomb body/warhead for use either as unguided or guided bombs.
    [Show full text]
  • O Emprego Dos Sistemas De Defesa Aérea Na Guerra Do Yom Kippur
    O Emprego dos Sistemas de Defesa Aérea na Guerra do Yom Kippur “We tried to drop low to avoid them. That was when we ran into the ZSUs. Before they hadn’t been much of a problem. Fly high enough and their range is too low to get you. Now we were trapped .If you flew too high, the SA-6 got you .If you dropped too low to avoid them, you ran into the ZSUs. Anything that can pump out that many shells in that short a time is just best avoided .” Piloto Israel ita de um F -4 Phantom 1-Introdução O desenrolar da História e em particular a História Militar é algo que pode ser comparado ao monitor de batimento cardíaco que existe nos hospitais. Em determinados momentos a linha do monitor encontra-se estável, como também acontece haver saltos periódicos quando o coração bate. Esta premissa pode ser comparada justamente com o historial de Guerra e Paz que tem vindo a acontecer no Médio Oriente. A linha estável do monitor de batimento cardíaco relaciona-se com o clima de não Guerra e não Paz que existe durante longos períodos de tempo na região e os saltos periódicos do batimento cardíaco relacionam-se com os conflitos militares de pequena e média intensidade que decorrem ocasionalmente. O Conflito Israelo-Árabe de 1973, também chamado por Guerra do Yom Kippur pelos Israelitas ou Guerra de Outubro pelos Árabes 1 iniciou-se no dia 6 de Outubro de 1973 e terminou no dia 24 do mesmo mês. Este conflito caracterizou-se por ser o quarto a decorrer na região do Médio Oriente desde a independência do Estado de Israel no ano de 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense FY 2002 Supplemental Request to Continue the Global War on Terrorism
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FY 2002 SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST TO CONTINUE THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM NT OF E D M E T F R E A N P S E E D U N A I IC T R ED E S AM TATE S OF March 2002 Department of Defense FY 2002 Supplemental Request To Continue the Global War on Terrorism Table of Contents Introduction........................................................................................................................... 2 Overview of Requirements................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Requirements .................................................................................................. 4 Military Operations and Mobilization Summary ...................................................... 5 Military Operations and Mobilization Justification................................................... 6 Personnel Readiness Summary..................................................................................... 8 Personnel Readiness Justification ................................................................................ 8 Weapons and Munitions Summary.............................................................................. 9 Weapons and Munitions Justification ........................................................................10 Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence Summary ......................... 13 Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence Justification..................... 13 Coalition Support Summary......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Missilesmissilesdr Carlo Kopp in the Asia-Pacific
    MISSILESMISSILESDr Carlo Kopp in the Asia-Pacific oday, offensive missiles are the primary armament of fighter aircraft, with missile types spanning a wide range of specialised niches in range, speed, guidance technique and intended target. With the Pacific Rim and Indian Ocean regions today the fastest growing area globally in buys of evolved third generation combat aircraft, it is inevitable that this will be reflected in the largest and most diverse inventory of weapons in service. At present the established inventories of weapons are in transition, with a wide variety of Tlegacy types in service, largely acquired during the latter Cold War era, and new technology 4th generation missiles are being widely acquired to supplement or replace existing weapons. The two largest players remain the United States and Russia, although indigenous Israeli, French, German, British and Chinese weapons are well established in specific niches. Air to air missiles, while demanding technologically, are nevertheless affordable to develop and fund from a single national defence budget, and they result in greater diversity than seen previously in larger weapons, or combat aircraft designs. Air-to-air missile types are recognised in three distinct categories: highly agile Within Visual Range (WVR) missiles; less agile but longer ranging Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missiles; and very long range BVR missiles. While the divisions between the latter two categories are less distinct compared against WVR missiles, the longer ranging weapons are often quite unique and usually much larger, to accommodate the required propellant mass. In technological terms, several important developments have been observed over the last decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 71/Tuesday, April 14, 2015/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices 19967 ending at 5:30 p.m. each day, or as national visitors should contact Dr. Jim 16 to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery necessary to complete business. The Hastie at (206) 860–3412 at least 2 Management Plan, in conjunction with Panel will adjourn on Friday, July 31. weeks prior to the meeting date to Final Rule 0648–BE75. The information The locations of the meetings are as initiate the security clearance process. collection currently approved under follows: OMB Control No. 0648–0605 includes a Special Accommodations The STAR Panel for canary rockfish number of reporting requirements and darkblotched rockfish will be held This meeting is physically accessible necessary to end overfishing, rebuild the Hotel Deca, 4507 Brooklyn Avenue to people with disabilities. Requests for overfished groundfish stocks, and NE., Seattle, WA 98105; telephone: sign language interpretation or other mitigate the adverse economic impacts (206) 634–2000. auxiliary aids should be directed to Mr. of increased effort controls. This The STAR Panel for the bocaccio and Kris Kleinschmidt at (503) 820–2425 at revision proposes to modify only the China rockfish stock assessments will be least 5 days prior to the meeting date. broad stock area reporting requirements held at the NMFS, Southwest Fisheries Dated: April 8, 2015. currently approved under the Science Center, Santa Cruz Laboratory, Information Collection for Amendment 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA William D. Chappell, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable 16. We are seeking comments on a 95060; telephone: (831) 420–3900. provision that, if approved, would The STAR Panels for the black Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadlands Armory—Revolvers.”
    Rifles Part III. Magazines In Motion: Revolvers, Turrets, & Harmonicas Revolving Magazines The nineteenth century was a time of great mechanical innovation, marked by thousands of inventive creators seeking patents for all manner of curiously-engineered devices. Firearms were no exception, and a glance at any “weird weapons” collection reveals dozens of oddities, often stamped between 1820–1860. Many of these utilized some form of revolving magazine, whether a cylinder, a cluster of barrels, a turret, or some form of rotary chain. This introduction offers a short history of the revolver, followed by profiles for the more unique, popular, or interesting repeaters that use some form of moving magazine. A more detailed history of revolvers and the Colt patent is found in “Deadlands Armory—Revolvers.” Pepperbox Guns The general mechanism of a revolving magazine evolved from the “pepperbox” gun of the early nineteenth century. A pepperbox gun features a cluster of smooth-bore barrels which are rotated into position and fired individually. Predating the advent of the cartridge, pepperbox guns are muzzle-loaded, and require a separate primer charge for each barrel. Pepperbox guns began fading in popularity before the Civil War, replaced by the more efficient percussion revolver. The Percussion Revolver One of the most significant innovations in firearm design, a revolver features a cylindrical magazine that holds each round in an individual chamber. The first modern revolver was designed by Elisha Haydon Collier in 1814, and was a self-priming flintlock with a manually- rotated cylindrical magazine. Having been exposed to the Collier revolver during a voyage abroad, Samuel Colt made the critical innovation that earned him one of the century’s most famous patents—a revolving cylinder that was mechanically rotated.
    [Show full text]
  • GURPS+-+4Th+Edition+-+High-Tech
    Written by SHAWN FISHER, MICHAEL HURST, and HANS-CHRISTIAN VORTISCH Additional Material by DAVID L. PULVER, SEAN PUNCH, GENE SEABOLT, and WILLIAM H. STODDARD Edited by SEAN PUNCH Cover Art by ABRAR AJMAL and BOB STEVLIC Illustrated by BRENT CHUMLEY, IGOR FIORENTINI, NATHAN GEPPERT, BRENDAN KEOUGH, and BOB STEVLIC ISBN 978-1-55634-770-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 STEVE JACKSON GAMES 5. WEAPONRY. 78 FIREARMS . .78 Dirty Tech: Full-Auto Conversions . 79 How to Treat Your Gun . 79 CONTENTS Drawing Your Weapon . 81 Immediate Action. 81 INTRODUCTION . 4 PERSONAL DEVICES AND Shooting. 82 Publication History. 4 CONSUMER GOODS . 30 Reloading Your Gun . 86 About the Authors. 4 Personal Accessories. 31 Careful Loading . 86 Appliances . 32 Black-Powder Fouling . 86 1. THE EQUIPMENT AGE . 5 Foodstuffs . 33 Air Guns . 88 Ranged Electric Stunners . 89 TIMELINE . 6 Luxuries . 34 TL5: The Industrial Revolution . 6 Non-Repeating Pistols . 90 COMMUNICATIONS . 35 Revolvers . 92 TL6: The Mechanized Age . 6 Mail and Freight . 35 TL7: The Nuclear Age. 6 Dirty Tech: Improvised Guns . 92 Telegraph . 36 Semiautomatic Pistols . 97 TL8: The Digital Age . 6 Telephone. 36 Dirty Tech . 6 Automatic Revolver . 97 Radio . 37 Disguised Firearms . 98 BUYING EQUIPMENT . 7 Radio in Use. 38 Rocket Pistol. 99 You Get What You Pay For . 7 Other Communications . 40 Shotguns . 103 The Black Market . 7 MEDIA . 40 Muskets and Rifles . 107 New Perk: Equipment Bond . 7 Audio Storage, Recording, Drilling . 108 Legality and Antiques. 8 and Playback . 40 Minié Balls . 109 WEAR AND CARE . 9 Video Storage, Recording, The Kalashnikov .
    [Show full text]
  • Sukhoi's Fullback
    TECHNOLOGY EXPLAINED Sukhoi Fullback by Dr Carlo Kopp While the region has seen the deployment and from the wide fuselage tunnel. As a result of this manufacture of hundreds of Flankers since the the aircraft’s effective wing loading is much lower early 1990s, all of these have been incremen- than that of aircraft with different configurations. tal developments of the baseline Su-27S and This is reflected in superb high alpha handling and Su-27UB tandem seat airframes. sustained turn rates. The enlarged LERX/canards Since the early 1980s the Sukhoi bureau has been migrated to a range of other Flanker variants, in- developing a family of derivative airframes, which cluding the Su-35, Su-37 and production Su-30MKI. utilise side by side seating. With ongoing industry Experience from initial Su-27K flight testing and speculation about regional buys of these aircraft, trials indicated that major issues would arise with this month’s analysis will explore the features, capa- training pilots for carrier recoveries. Without the bilities and growth potential of the Fullback family large range of aircraft types, and specialised carrier of Flanker derivatives. trainers operated by the US Navy, the Soviet AV-MF needed an aircraft which was identical in handling Sukhoi Su-27KUB to the basic Su-27K but dual seated, without the for- The navalised Su-27K for Korabl’ny was devel- ward visibility impediments of the existing tandem oped for the Project 1143.5 55,000 tonne class air- configuration Su-27UB. craft carrier, of which four were to have been built. Design of the dual navalised combat trainer de- The Su-27K is the Russian equivalent to the US Navy rivative began in 1989, the aim being to produce an F-14, but also important as it was the prototype for airframe suitable for a range of other carrier based design features which migrated to a wide range of roles such as reconnaissance, aerial refuelling, mari- other Flanker variants and derivatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide
    WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT GUIDE TRADOC DCSINT Threat Support Directorate DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Worldwide Equipment Guide Sep 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Memorandum, 24 Sep 2001 ...................................... *i V-150................................................................. 2-12 Introduction ............................................................ *vii VTT-323 ......................................................... 2-12.1 Table: Units of Measure........................................... ix WZ 551........................................................... 2-12.2 Errata Notes................................................................ x YW 531A/531C/Type 63 Vehicle Series........... 2-13 Supplement Page Changes.................................... *xiii YW 531H/Type 85 Vehicle Series ................... 2-14 1. INFANTRY WEAPONS ................................... 1-1 Infantry Fighting Vehicles AMX-10P IFV................................................... 2-15 Small Arms BMD-1 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-17 AK-74 5.45-mm Assault Rifle ............................. 1-3 BMD-3 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-19 RPK-74 5.45-mm Light Machinegun................... 1-4 BMP-1 IFV..................................................... 2-20.1 AK-47 7.62-mm Assault Rifle .......................... 1-4.1 BMP-1P IFV...................................................... 2-21 Sniper Rifles.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Xenta Series Radars for Superior Detection and Performance Against Drones and Aerial Targets in Air Defense and Critical Infrastructure Applications
    a8.90 D 14974 E D European & Security ES & Defence 9/2020 International Security and Defence Journal COUNTRY FOCUS: POLAND ISSN 1617-7983 • Dutch-Belgian www.euro-sd.com • Naval Cooperation • Logistic Trucks • Multinational Corps Northeast • Armoured Vehicles from • Equipping Medical Responders Eastern Europe for CBRN Scenarios September 2020 • The Art of Electronic Eavesdropping • European 8x8 Vehicles Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology ELCAN SPECTER® WEAPON SIGHTS Long range. Close up. One sight. Only the ELCAN Specter® DR dual role weapon sight can instantly switch between close-combat battle mode and precision ranged fire mode. It delivers superior capabilities to protect troops – and provide a trusted advantage – across any domain, any challenge, and every mission. RTX.com/ELCAN ©2020 Raytheon Company, a Raytheon Technologies company. 20RIS013_ELCAN_ADLO_210x297.indd 1 8/20/20 3:09 PM Editorial Eastern Mediterranean: Paris Shows Impatience – with Ulterior Motives? In view of Turkey's actions in the Eastern Mediterranean, France announced that it would increase its mili- tary presence there. On closer inspection, Paris is using units of the French armed forces on the ground to take a stand. Two RAFALE B of the 4th Fighter Wing, sent to Cyprus for an exercise from 10 to 12 August, Photo: author made a stopover in Crete on 13 August. A French C-130FR HERCULES tanker aircraft is also present at the Andreas Papandreou air base in Paphos (Cyprus), also in connection with the exercise. The helicopter carrier (PHA) TONNERRE with support material on the way to Beirut was temporarily joined by the frigate LA FAYETTE, which was in Larnaca (Cyprus) as part of a bilateral exercise with the Hellenic Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems
    Dec Worldwide Equipment Guide 2016 Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems TRADOC G-2 ACE–Threats Integration Ft. Leavenworth, KS Distribution Statement: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Opposing Force: Worldwide Equipment Guide Chapters Volume 2 Volume 2 Air and Air Defense Systems Volume 2 Signature Letter Volume 2 TOC and Introduction Volume 2 Tier Tables – Fixed Wing, Rotary Wing, UAVs, Air Defense Chapter 1 Fixed Wing Aviation Chapter 2 Rotary Wing Aviation Chapter 3 UAVs Chapter 4 Aviation Countermeasures, Upgrades, Emerging Technology Chapter 5 Unconventional and SPF Arial Systems Chapter 6 Theatre Missiles Chapter 7 Air Defense Systems 2 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Units of Measure The following example symbols and abbreviations are used in this guide. Unit of Measure Parameter (°) degrees (of slope/gradient, elevation, traverse, etc.) GHz gigahertz—frequency (GHz = 1 billion hertz) hp horsepower (kWx1.341 = hp) Hz hertz—unit of frequency kg kilogram(s) (2.2 lb.) kg/cm2 kg per square centimeter—pressure km kilometer(s) km/h km per hour kt knot—speed. 1 kt = 1 nautical mile (nm) per hr. kW kilowatt(s) (1 kW = 1,000 watts) liters liters—liquid measurement (1 gal. = 3.785 liters) m meter(s)—if over 1 meter use meters; if under use mm m3 cubic meter(s) m3/hr cubic meters per hour—earth moving capacity m/hr meters per hour—operating speed (earth moving) MHz megahertz—frequency (MHz = 1 million hertz) mach mach + (factor) —aircraft velocity (average 1062 km/h) mil milliradian, radial measure (360° = 6400 mils, 6000 Russian) min minute(s) mm millimeter(s) m/s meters per second—velocity mt metric ton(s) (mt = 1,000 kg) nm nautical mile = 6076 ft (1.152 miles or 1.86 km) rd/min rounds per minute—rate of fire RHAe rolled homogeneous armor (equivalent) shp shaft horsepower—helicopter engines (kWx1.341 = shp) µm micron/micrometer—wavelength for lasers, etc.
    [Show full text]