Final Evaluation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Evaluation Report 30 Final Evaluation Report Evaluation of UNICEF’s Response and Recovery Efforts to the Gorkha Earthquake in Nepal (25 April 2015 – 31 January 2016) 1 DARA Evaluation Team June 2016 Contents Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Overview of the evaluation purpose ............................................................................. 7 1.2 Evaluation objectives and intended audience .............................................................. 7 1.3 Evaluation methodology ............................................................................................... 7 1.4 Most important findings and conclusions ..................................................................... 8 1.5 Main recommendations .............................................................................................. 12 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 12 2.1 Nepal's gender and human rights challenges ............................................................. 13 2.2 Gorkha earthquake: context and humanitarian response .......................................... 14 2.2.1 Description of UNICEF response, recovery and reconstruction efforts .............. 16 2.3 Purpose and objectives of the evaluation ................................................................... 17 2.4 Scope of the evaluation ............................................................................................... 17 2.5 Methodology ............................................................................................................... 18 2.5.1 Evaluation criteria and evaluation questions ...................................................... 19 2.5.2 Evaluation process: methods for data collection and analysis ........................... 19 2.5.3 Limitations ........................................................................................................... 21 3. Evaluation Findings ............................................................................................................. 22 3.1 Appropriateness .......................................................................................................... 22 3.1.1 Immediate post-disaster response ...................................................................... 22 3.1.2 Alignment with standards on humanitarian action ............................................ 22 3.1.3 Response to local needs ...................................................................................... 23 3.1.4 Equity and gender-sensitive programming ......................................................... 27 3.1.5 Community participation and communications .................................................. 28 3.2 Connectedness/ Sustainability .................................................................................... 29 3.2.1 Contingency planning/preparedness measures .................................................. 29 3.2.2 Planning for transition ......................................................................................... 30 3.2.3 Transition-oriented activities incorporated into programmes ........................... 31 3.3 Coordination ................................................................................................................ 33 3.3.1 Internal coordination .......................................................................................... 33 3.3.2 Compliance with CLA responsibilities ................................................................. 34 3.3.3 Coordination arrangements in UNICEF led clusters ............................................ 35 3.3.4 Sub-national coordination ................................................................................... 36 3.3.5 Communication with Communities ..................................................................... 36 3.4 Coverage ...................................................................................................................... 37 2 3.4.1 Overall coverage issues: sections' challenges ..................................................... 37 3.4.2 Coverage of vulnerable groups ........................................................................... 41 3.5 Efficiency ..................................................................................................................... 44 3.5.1 Timeliness ............................................................................................................ 44 3.5.2 Survey findings on timeliness .............................................................................. 46 3.5.3 Cost effectiveness ............................................................................................... 47 3.5.4 Funds mobilization .............................................................................................. 47 3.5.5 Human Resource mobilization ............................................................................ 49 3.5.6 Supplies mobilization .......................................................................................... 49 3.5.7 Partner mobilization: PCAs .................................................................................. 51 3.5.8 Efficiency of the transition process ..................................................................... 53 3.5.9 M&E ..................................................................................................................... 53 3.5.10 Innovation ........................................................................................................... 54 3.6 Effectiveness ............................................................................................................... 54 3.6.1 Results achieved against programme targets ..................................................... 55 3.6.2 Adequacy: Quality Standards .............................................................................. 58 3.6.3 Integration of UNICEF programmes .................................................................... 62 3.6.4 Progress towards human rights .......................................................................... 63 4. Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................... 64 4.1 Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 70 4.2 Lessons learned ........................................................................................................... 71 Figures Figure 1: Suitability of support provided by group (Dhading and Sindhupalchowk) .................. 27 Figure 2: Community consultation and participation ................................................................. 28 Figure 3: Support received by district ......................................................................................... 38 Figure 4: Number of TLCs targeted and established by district .................................................. 39 Figure 5: Number of water systems targeted and reached for repair/ rehabilitation................ 40 Figure 6: Number of individuals receiving support for new/rehabilitated household latrines (targeted and reached) ............................................................................................................... 40 Figure 7: Number of individuals targeted and reached for soap distribution ............................ 41 Figure 8: Percentage of missing data for activities listed in WASH 4Ws, Individuals targeted .. 42 Figure 9: Timeliness of support received (average of responses per sector) ............................. 47 Figure 10: Total procurement value by type of procurement – based on PO creation date regardless of the sales order creation date and sales order status ............................................ 50 Figure 11: Sales orders budget (including freight lines) released per month ............................. 51 Figure 12: Final status of completed deliveries as per agreed sales order TAD (excluding deliveries with TAD before sales order date) by number of POs ................................................ 51 Figure 13: PCA breakdown per section ....................................................................................... 52 Figure 14: Month of PCA signature ............................................................................................. 52 Figure 15: Number of days between submission date and signature of PCAs ........................... 52 Figure 16: Summary of the achievement before, during and after the Child Nutrition Week ... 57 Figure 17: Adequacy of Support Received .................................................................................. 59 3 Figure 18: Cash transfer programme estimated beneficiaries reached by district ..................... 60 Figure 19: Coverage of UNICEF Education interventions ............................................................ 63 Figure 20: Coverage of UNICEF WASH interventions .................................................................. 63 Tables Table 1: Timeline of the initial response ..................................................................................... 44 Table 2: UNICEF Funding Summary ............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Nepal Earthquake District Profile - Gorkha OSOCC Assessment Cell 09.05.2015
    Nepal Earthquake District Profile - Gorkha OSOCC Assessment Cell 09.05.2015 This report is produced by the OSOCC Assessment Cell based on secondary data from multiple sources, including the Government of Nepal, UNDAC, United Nations Agencies, non-governmental organisation and media sources. I. Situation Overview Gorkha, with a population of more than 271,000, is one of the worst-affected districts.1 The epicenter of the earthquake was in Brapok, 15km from Gorkha town. As of 6 May, 412 people have been reported killed and 1,034 injured. In the southern part of the district, food has been provided, but field observations indicate that the food supplied might not be enough for the actual population in the area. Several VDCs in the mountainous areas of Gorkha are yet to be reached by humanitarian assistance. There are no roads in these northern areas, only footpaths. The level of destruction within the district and even within VDCs varies widely, as does the availability of food. A humanitarian hub has been set up at the Chief District Officer’s (CDO) premises in Gorkha town. Reported number of people in need (multiple sources) The figures featured in this map have been collected via multiple sources (district authorities, Red Cross, local NGO, media). Where multiple figures for the same location have been reported the highest one was taken. These figures are indicative and do not represent the overall number of people in need. 1 This is an updated version of the Gorkha District Profile that was published by ACAPS on 1 May 2015. As with other mountain areas of Nepal, Gorkha contains popular locations for foreign trekkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • RE Subsidy Policy, 2073(English)
    (Unofficial Translation) Government of Nepal Ministry of Population and Environment Renewable Energy Subsidy Policy, 2073 BS May 2016 1. Background Nepal is endowed with good renewable energy potential. The major sources of renewable energy are mini and micro hydropower, solar energy, various forms of biomass energy, biogas and wind energy etc. Despite huge renewable energy potential, still around 85% of the total final energy consumption in Nepal is met by traditional biomass energy and around 28% of households (HHs) in Nepal do not have access to electricity. It is not possible to significantly improve the living standard of the low income population living in the rural areas if their renewable energy demand is not met. Extension of national grid to reach those areas is not possible in many years to come due to difficult terrain, high cost and existing energy crisis in the country. Therefore, clean and sustainable energy such as Renewable Energy Technologies (RETs) needs to be developed as immediate and long-term solutions. The economic hardship of people living in the rural areas and the high initial cost of the RETs justifies the need of subsidy and concessional credit facilities to increase access to cleaner energy. 2. Past Efforts The Government of Nepal (GoN) has been supporting promotion and development of RETs since more than past two decades with support from Development Partners (DPs), private sector and non- governmental organizations. These initiatives have resulted in significant fruitful achievements in the development of renewable energy in the country. The GoN and DPs have been providing financial and technical support to increase energy access in the rural areas both for household's consumption and productive end uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
    Chapter 3 Project Evaluation and Recommendations 3-1 Project Effect It is appropriate to implement the Project under Japan's Grant Aid Assistance, because the Project will have the following effects: (1) Direct Effects 1) Improvement of Educational Environment By replacing deteriorated classrooms, which are danger in structure, with rainwater leakage, and/or insufficient natural lighting and ventilation, with new ones of better quality, the Project will contribute to improving the education environment, which will be effective for improving internal efficiency. Furthermore, provision of toilets and water-supply facilities will greatly encourage the attendance of female teachers and students. Present(※) After Project Completion Usable classrooms in Target Districts 19,177 classrooms 21,707 classrooms Number of Students accommodated in the 709,410 students 835,820 students usable classrooms ※ Including the classrooms to be constructed under BPEP-II by July 2004 2) Improvement of Teacher Training Environment By constructing exclusive facilities for Resource Centres, the Project will contribute to activating teacher training and information-sharing, which will lead to improved quality of education. (2) Indirect Effects 1) Enhancement of Community Participation to Education Community participation in overall primary school management activities will be enhanced through participation in this construction project and by receiving guidance on various educational matters from the government. 91 3-2 Recommendations For the effective implementation of the project, it is recommended that HMG of Nepal take the following actions: 1) Coordination with other donors As and when necessary for the effective implementation of the Project, the DOE should ensure effective coordination with the CIP donors in terms of the CIP components including the allocation of target districts.
    [Show full text]
  • VBST Short List
    1 आिेदकको दर्ा ा न륍बर नागररकर्ा न륍बर नाम थायी जि쥍ला गा.वि.स. बािुको नाम ईभेꅍट ID 10002 2632 SUMAN BHATTARAI KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. KEDAR PRASAD BHATTARAI 136880 10003 28733 KABIN PRAJAPATI BHAKTAPUR BHAKTAPUR N.P. SITA RAM PRAJAPATI 136882 10008 271060/7240/5583 SUDESH MANANDHAR KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. SHREE KRISHNA MANANDHAR 136890 10011 9135 SAMERRR NAKARMI KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. BASANTA KUMAR NAKARMI 136943 10014 407/11592 NANI MAYA BASNET DOLAKHA BHIMESWOR N.P. SHREE YAGA BAHADUR BASNET136951 10015 62032/450 USHA ADHIJARI KAVRE PANCHKHAL BHOLA NATH ADHIKARI 136952 10017 411001/71853 MANASH THAPA GULMI TAMGHAS KASHER BAHADUR THAPA 136954 10018 44874 RAJ KUMAR LAMICHHANE PARBAT TILAHAR KRISHNA BAHADUR LAMICHHANE136957 10021 711034/173 KESHAB RAJ BHATTA BAJHANG BANJH JANAK LAL BHATTA 136964 10023 1581 MANDEEP SHRESTHA SIRAHA SIRAHA N.P. KUMAR MAN SHRESTHA 136969 2 आिेदकको दर्ा ा न륍बर नागररकर्ा न륍बर नाम थायी जि쥍ला गा.वि.स. बािुको नाम ईभेꅍट ID 10024 283027/3 SHREE KRISHNA GHARTI LALITPUR GODAWARI DURGA BAHADUR GHARTI 136971 10025 60-01-71-00189 CHANDRA KAMI JUMLA PATARASI JAYA LAL KAMI 136974 10026 151086/205 PRABIN YADAV DHANUSHA MARCHAIJHITAKAIYA JAYA NARAYAN YADAV 136976 10030 1012/81328 SABINA NAGARKOTI KATHMANDU DAANCHHI HARI KRISHNA NAGARKOTI 136984 10032 1039/16713 BIRENDRA PRASAD GUPTABARA KARAIYA SAMBHU SHA KANU 136988 10033 28-01-71-05846 SURESH JOSHI LALITPUR LALITPUR U.M.N.P. RAJU JOSHI 136990 10034 331071/6889 BIJAYA PRASAD YADAV BARA RAUWAHI RAM YAKWAL PRASAD YADAV 136993 10036 071024/932 DIPENDRA BHUJEL DHANKUTA TANKHUWA LOCHAN BAHADUR BHUJEL 136996 10037 28-01-067-01720 SABIN K.C.
    [Show full text]
  • District Report Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform, Nepal Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform
    Monthly District Report Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform, Nepal Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform District Report Gorkha 12 April – 9 May 2019 Summary of events during this period Name of activity/event Event date Participants Contact Person Reference summary Document Male Female HRRP team, M & E consultant, 15th to 19 techcord.gorkha@hrrpnepal and DSE conducted field visit April 2019 .org; at Barpak Sulikot and Dharche [email protected] Rural Municipality from 15th to 19 April 2019. The details action plans and objective of the meeting has been stated in the field visit section. HRRP/GMALI jointly organized 17th April 14 1 Techcord.gorkha@hrrpnepal preparatory meeting with POs 2019 .org, for the program of Earthquake [email protected], Memorial Day in presence of [email protected] CDO, Gorkha, Mayor of Gorkha Municipality, and key POs in the district. The agenda of the meeting to jointly organize the earthquake Memorial Day effectively to disseminate message of safer construction and resilient community. GMALI Gorkha organized 4th 25th April [email protected] Earthquake Memorial Day in 2019 [email protected] Gorkha on 25th April 2019 at DCC Hall. HRRP Gorkha has facilitated the program and planning. All the active POs, government stakeholders, political leaders, local representatives, media, civil societies, representatives of bank were actively participated in the program. HRRP participated Demo 23rd April [email protected], house handover program 2019 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • NEPAL: Gorkha - Operational Presence Map [As of 14 July 2015]
    NEPAL: Gorkha - Operational Presence Map [as of 14 July 2015] 60 Samagaun Partners working in Gorkha Chhekampar 1-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-35 Lho Bihi Prok Chunchet Partners working in Nepal Sirdibas Health 26 Keroja Shelter and NFI Uhiya 23 Ghyachok Laprak WASH 18 Kharibot Warpak Gumda Kashigaun Protection 13 Lapu HansapurSimjung Muchchok Manbu Kerabari Sairpani Thumo Early Recovery 6 Jaubari Swara Thalajung Aaruaarbad Harmi ShrithankotTar k u k ot Amppipal ArupokhariAruchanaute Education 5 Palungtar Chhoprak Masel Tandrang Khoplang Tap le Gaikhur Dhawa Virkot PhinamAsrang Nutrition 1 Chyangling Borlang Bungkot Prithbinarayan Municipality Namjung DhuwakotDeurali Bakrang GhairungTan gli ch ok Tak lu ng Phujel Manakamana Makaising Darbung Mumlichok Ghyalchok IMPLEMENTING PARTNERS BY CLUSTER Early Recovery Education Health 6 partners 5 partners 26 partners Nb of Nb of Nb of organisations organisations organisations 1 >=5 1 >=5 1 >=5 Nutrition Protection Shelter and NFI 1 partners 13 partners 23 partners Nb of Nb of Nb of organisations organisations organisations 1 >=5 1 >=5 1 >=5 WASH 18 partners Want to find out the latest 3W products and other info on Nepal Earthquake response? visit the Humanitarian Response website at http:www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/op Nb of Note: organisations Implementing partners represent the organization on the ground, erations/nepal in the affected district doing operational work, such as send feedback to 1 >=5 distributing food, tents, water purification kits etc. [email protected] Creation date:23 July 2015 Glide number: EQ-2015-000048-NPL Sources: Cluster reporting The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Uf]/Vf K'gm;J]{If0f Ug'{Kg]{ Nfeu|Fxl Ljj/0F
    g]kfn ;/sf/ ;+3Lo dfldnf tyf :yfgLo ljsf; dGqfno s]Gb|Lo cfof]hgf sfof{Gjog OsfO{ e"sDkLo cfjf; k'glg{df{0f cfof]hgf Hjfun, nlntk'/ uf]/vf k'gM;j]{If0f ug'{kg]{ nfeu|fxL ljj/0f . S.N G_ID RV/RS Grievant Name District VDC/MUN (P) Ward(P) Tole GP/NP WARD Slip No Remarks 1 281924 RS Nettra Bahadur Thap Gorkha Aanppipal 1 bajredanda Palungtar 3 21350 2 290180 RS Sabitri Devi Bhattrai Gorkha Aanppipal 1 bajredanda Palungtar 3 212331 3 288425 RS Jit Bahadur Rana Magar Gorkha Aanppipal 1 jal jala Palungtar 3 4 290553 RS Dhan Bahadur Rana Gorkha Aanppipal 1 judi thumka Palungtar 3 5 290114 RS Rithe Sarki Gorkha Aanppipal 1 pathivara Palungtar 3 6 288914 RS Tulka Sarki Gorkha Aanppipal 1 pathivara Palungtar 3 7 288959 RS Arjun Baniya Gorkha Aanppipal 1 pathivara Palungtar 3 8 290178 RS Sanak Bahadur Bhattrai Gorkha Aanppipal 1 pathivara Palungtar 3 9 290030 RS Jibarayal Miya Gorkha Aanppipal 2 dumre danda Palungtar 3 10 290560 RS Gurungseni Sunar Gorkha Aanppipal 2 maibal Palungtar 3 215317 11 290034 RS Damar Kumari Thapa Gorkha Aanppipal 2 maibal Palungtar 3 12 288925 RS Amar Bahadur Kuwar Gorkha Aanppipal 2 pachchyan Palungtar 3 13 290556 RS Rajendra Dhakal Gorkha Aanppipal 2 raute pani Palungtar 3 215570 14 286299 RS Sarala Devkota Gorkha Aanppipal 2 raute pani Palungtar 3 423666 15 288462 RS Bijaya Raj Devkota Gorkha Aanppipal 2 raute pani Palungtar 3 16 288920 RS Shree Niwas Devkota Gorkha Aanppipal 2 raute pani Palungtar 3 17 290055 RS Uttam Kumar Shtestha Gorkha Aanppipal 2 raute pani Palungtar 3 18 290047 RS Brendra Devkota Gorkha Aanppipal
    [Show full text]
  • TSLC PMT Result
    Page 62 of 132 Rank Token No SLC/SEE Reg No Name District Palika WardNo Father Mother Village PMTScore Gender TSLC 1 42060 7574O15075 SOBHA BOHARA BOHARA Darchula Rithachaupata 3 HARI SINGH BOHARA BIMA BOHARA AMKUR 890.1 Female 2 39231 7569013048 Sanju Singh Bajura Gotree 9 Gyanendra Singh Jansara Singh Manikanda 902.7 Male 3 40574 7559004049 LOGAJAN BHANDARI Humla ShreeNagar 1 Hari Bhandari Amani Bhandari Bhandari gau 907 Male 4 40374 6560016016 DHANRAJ TAMATA Mugu Dhainakot 8 Bali Tamata Puni kala Tamata Dalitbada 908.2 Male 5 36515 7569004014 BHUVAN BAHADUR BK Bajura Martadi 3 Karna bahadur bk Dhauli lawar Chaurata 908.5 Male 6 43877 6960005019 NANDA SINGH B K Mugu Kotdanda 9 Jaya bahadur tiruwa Muga tiruwa Luee kotdanda mugu 910.4 Male 7 40945 7535076072 Saroj raut kurmi Rautahat GarudaBairiya 7 biswanath raut pramila devi pipariya dostiya 911.3 Male 8 42712 7569023079 NISHA BUDHa Bajura Sappata 6 GAN BAHADUR BUDHA AABHARI BUDHA CHUDARI 911.4 Female 9 35970 7260012119 RAMU TAMATATA Mugu Seri 5 Padam Bahadur Tamata Manamata Tamata Bamkanda 912.6 Female 10 36673 7375025003 Akbar Od Baitadi Pancheswor 3 Ganesh ram od Kalawati od Kalauti 915.4 Male 11 40529 7335011133 PRAMOD KUMAR PANDIT Rautahat Dharhari 5 MISHRI PANDIT URMILA DEVI 915.8 Male 12 42683 7525055002 BIMALA RAI Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Man Bahadur Rai Gauri Maya Rai Ghodghad 915.9 Female 13 42758 7525055016 SABIN AALE MAGAR Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Raj Kumar Aale Magqar Devi Aale Magar Ghodghad 915.9 Male 14 42459 7217094014 SOBHA DHAKAL Dolakha GhangSukathokar 2 Bishnu Prasad Dhakal
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Municipality Profile
    RURAL MUNICIPALITY PROFILE Office of Rural Municipality Arughat Province no. 4 2074 , ii , Abbreviation Acronyms Full Form VDC Village Development Committee RM Rural Municipality FY Fiscal Year M Meter Mm Millimeter Km Kilo meter DDC District Development Committee DCWB District Child Welfare Board DRCN District Road Core Network Ha Hector ECD Education for Child Development SLC School Leaving Certificate DEO District Education Office DHO District Health Office CLC Community Learning Center PS Primary School LSS Lower Secondary School SS Secondary School DCWB District Child Welfare Board iii , Contents 1 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Method ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Limitation of Study .......................................................................................................... 2 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Geo-Physical
    [Show full text]
  • Vol2 Quarterlybulletin 2.Pdf
    Volume II Asal Chhimekee Nepal International Medical Corps Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN United Nations World Food Programme USAID / Sajhedari Bikaas Project People In Need Save the Children UN Women ECO Nepal United Nations Children’s Fund Community Support Group Good Neighbors International International Organization for Migration World Health Organization Nepal Red Cross Society International Nepal Fellowship Department for International Development World Vision International CARE Nepal OXFAM United Nations Development Programme Recovery & Reconstruction Quarterly Bulletin | Gorkha June 2016 Volume II Asal Chhimekee Nepal Asal Chimekee Nepal is an organization which was registered as NGO in 2059 and was started by Pokhara Christian Community Kaski. Asal Chimekee Nepal works close coordination with DDRC, related district government offices, like minded organizations, local communities and churches in Gorkha. Updates of Asal Chhimekee Nepal (ACN); 1. Asal Chhimekee is working in Shreenathkot, Aappipal, Ghairung, Bhumlichowk and Ghyalchowk VDC's in Gorkha focusing on rehabilitation, reconstruction, livelihood & health, disaster preparedness and strengthening local community in close coordination with government bodies and local community. 2. New Health Post Building Handed Over to the local community in Shreenathkot: After completing the reconstruction of Shreenathkot Health Post and supplying furnishing and medical equipment, in March 2016 it was formally handed over to the local community. It was handed over in the presence of local beneficiaries, stakeholders, service receivers, chief district officer from District Health Office, VDC governmental bodies of Gorkha district and Asal Chhimekee Executive. 3. Reconstructions: Asal Chhimekee Nepal is in the process of the rebuilding of four Health Post building in Aappipal, Ghairung, Bhumlichowk & Ghyalchowk VDC's.
    [Show full text]
  • GNI Earthquake Response 2015-2019
    Nepal’s geography makes it prone to natural disasters which cause significant loss of lives and property every year. 2015 was an unfortunate year for 128,000 the people of Nepal. The Individuals Benefitted April 25th Earthquake hit Nepal very hard. Gorkha, Kathmandu, and Lalitpur where GNI Nepal had on- going interventions were Total Budget among the worst affected NRs. 574,141,298 districts. Gorkha being the epicentre suffered the most. EMERGENCY RESPONSE Sphere Standards. We reached 915 earthquake 72,430 Earthquake survivors were in immediate survivors in different parts of Gorkha District earthquake need of shelter, food, and non-food items with health care services through a health survivors reached (NFIs), WASH (Water, Sanitation and Hygiene) hygiene kits camp each in Soti and Aaruarbang VDCs. They 1000 in Gorkha, Kathmandu, and health care services, and protection. We distributed in Gorkha were treated for injuries, wounds, fractures, and Lalitpur districts reached 72,430 earthquake survivors (14,486 District water-borne diseases, fever, and diarrhea and households) in Gorkha Municipality, Ward provided with medicine. 1,000 hygiene kits No. 4 (former Finam VDC), Dharche Rural were also distributed among survivor families. GORKHA Municipality, Ward No. 7 (former Lapu VDC) KATHMANDU and Aarughat Rural Municipality, Ward No. 1, For restoring water supply, 21 poly water LALITPUR 21 poly water 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (former Aruarbang, Manbu and tanks were provided to communities in tanks provided 4 municipalities, Thumi VDCs) of Gorkha District; Tarkeshwor Gorkha, Kathmandu and Lalitpur districts. 109 to communities 3 rural municipalities, Municipality, Ward No. 1, 2, 7 (Sangla, temporary toilets were constructed at six health 21 wards of 3 districts Kavresthali, and Phutung VDCs), Tokha facilities, 61 schools, and in 42 communities.
    [Show full text]