40035B0

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

40035B0 '7 1 8h :14 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE r I .GIDENT 5 CQLOFFICEOF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY REPOSITORY~Q~ik- WASHINGTON. D.C. 20506 COLLECTION cs%(- (-V-aR% 23 December 1969 BOX No. L-X? . , b'A% FOLDER bbM-b' wnz&,31st0 Dear Dr. Bruner: I am writing to confirm our telephone conversation. The President's Science Advisory Committee (PSAC) has established a panel on Biological and Medical Science under the chairmanship of Dr. Ivan L. Bennett. The panel is devoting its initial efforts to a consideration of national health policy. On January 9 and 10 representatives of various Government agencies will meet with the panel to describe the relation between their agency's mission and health- related matters. The panel is particularly interested in learning the problems the agency faces with a view toward helping to solve these problems. We hope to see you on Saturday, January 10, 10:30 - 11:30 a. m., in Room 208 of the Executive Office Building. If you would care to prepare a written summary (25 copies of .. .. ... ....... .._ .._......-.. .. background information) to supplement your presentation, I . would be happy to distribute it to the panel members in advance of the meeting. In order to do this, I would have to receive the summary by January 5. I am looking forward to seeing you. 'Sincerely, , . , / Leonard Laster, M.D. ' Dr. H. D. Bruner ** Assistant Director Division of Biology and Medicine U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Ge rmantown, Maryland 3 GL A" - I 40035b0 < f SYNOPSIS OF GOlZLS OF TllE U. S. ATOMIC EKEEGY CO3PllSSlOY W11ICIl ARE RELATED TO IKALTH 1. PromoLe Xational Dcfcnse - To make the maximum contribution to the Con::#:oil deicnsc 2nd security of the United States through the devclopzcnc, use, and control of atomic energy for military and all other purposcs~whichare vital to the iiationnl security. 2. Contribute to General Welfare - To make tlic maximum 'contribution to the general welfare by conducting, assisting, and fostcring research and development, to encourage scientific and industrial progress in peaceful application, and to protect thc health and safety of the public. I 3. Strengthen Competition - To direct the development, use, and control of atomic energy so as to strengthen free competition in private enterprise. 4. Promote International Cooperation - To make the benefits of peaceful applications of atomic energy available to cooperating nations as widely as expanding technology arid considerations of coinmon'defense and security permit. Two Divisions of the Commission are charged with carrying out these Goals with reference to their health aspects. 1. The Division of Operational Safety develops and recommends safety policies, guides, and requirements followed by appraisal and evaluation of programs in the following areas for personnel of the , . .. .. ....5 .L. _..... ._ .._. , .. .. AEC and its contractors: a. Standards and interpretations for radiological protection b. Occupational Medicine and industrial hygiene c. Fire protection and industrial safety d. Air, water, soil and environmental control e. Waste management f. Emergency planning vis-a-vis accidents g. Ten other areas related to reactors, power sources, waste management, and transportation 2. The Division of Biology and Medicine is charged with: a. Bioxedical Research in Radiological Effects and Processes - To incrcasc basic knowledge of the biological effects of radiation on man and his cnviroiimenc and to provide scientific data to extend and rcfinc cxisting Guidance for the control of exposure to radiation. i i h. Health and Safety Problems - To utilize basic knowledge of radiation effects to evaluate the consequences of radiation exposure to man and to solve the relatcd practical health and safety probleiiis of atoiiiic energy opei-ations. c. Beneficial Applications - To discover beneficial uses of special nuclear and radioactive materials and accelerator radiations ior diagnosis and trent:ment of cancer and in other practical medical and biological applications. d. To cooperate with other agencies and national programs in conducting programs in basic and applied biomedical research on ionizing radiations and related fields. (Items 1 and 2 cover a very wide range of investigations which are directly related to resolving questions of the biologic hazards that might be associated with the rapid expansion of reactor programs and use of radiation in industry research and medicine. Radiation as a normal component of living things and the environ- ment cuts across conventional scientific disciplines and organizations so that problems and areas of investi- gation are correspondingly comprehensive. See Program . Booklet.) , 3. Organization of the Division of Biology and Medicine: a. Program development and control is administered by 40 . scientists of widely varied backgrounds supported by 41' administrative-secretarial personnel within the Headquarters at Germantown, Maryland. b. The research program is carried by contract via operational offices with educational institutions, companies, foundations and other government agencies. c. The current operating budget is essentially stacic at $89.5 M; about 75% is directed to the National Laboratories and large unit laboratories and 257, to individual investigators or small, groups in universities (average about $40,000 annually). .-*e-- - 4. Problems and Issues: a. The static budget is equivalent to a reduction in funding due to increasing salaries and other rising costs. The resulting -7- Enclosure I'B" I , dislocations and rcadjustmciits have been made morc acute hy the need to organize ncw programs, and to reorient and expand others to respond to organizations and members of Lhe piiblic who question the inLroduction of civilian nuclear power. Thus areas of equally important research, but of less urgency, are being deloycd or neglected. The effects of this deferral will bc felt within 5 to 10 year. b. The immediate and short-tcrm effects of ionizing radiation are reasonably vel1 understood, whereas clear data concerning the long- term or chronic effcc ts of such exposures are only now beginning to be obtained. More is known about the effects of radiation on man, animals , and special laboratory materials than on the componcnts in the environment that make up the "ecological webs;" a special effect iiiust be made in the latter area. Ecological studies above all require time; there is no reliable way of telescoping the procedures or the collection of the datz from such experiments. Second they are expensive and the publishable data appear disproportionately small. Third, only the mature investigator can affosd from a career standpoint to undertake such long-term possibly unrewarding studies regardless of the number of eventual publications. Fourth, there must be comqitincnts on both sic?es that the plan-led researches will be carried through and amply fuiided for the requisite number'of years--possibly 15 to 20. Fifth, the investigators must be . .. .. ....... , allowed a substantial fraction of their time to devote to scientific researches not precisely a part of the research plan and be supported in every way in such researches. The Division has pioneered in this type of investigation in man, animals , gcnctic models and several dif ferent environmc:irs. These reduce budgetary and program flexibility. Generally they tend to becmc progressively more expensive. Problems arise in connection with their cost, finding and keeping high quality scientific personnel, and justifying their con- tinuance during the fallow years before the long- tern effects become detectible and enough data arc accuniulatcd for statistizal reliability. The restrictions and limitations inherent in the long-term cxperiiiient arc not fully appreciated by scientists, much less the public. And yet they arc one of tlic necessary lines of evidence for responding to questions about cnvironnicnral coil taniina t ion. -8- Enclosure "B" 4003Sb3 c. Opposition LO the siting of reactors rakes the form of gencralizcd objections such as: Khat !;ill bc thc potential effects of its effluenLs on the "qualiLy of the ciivironment"? Responses based on Lhcory or analogy or on reference to recognized standards have not proved compelling. A full presentation of what in fact does happen whm actual reactor operations interact wiLh all components of thc environment seems to be the only response which will bct acceptable. Unfortunately the components of a circumscribed cnvironmcnt are complex and vary widely from location to location so that observations made on one site nay not be fully applicable to another. But if a combination of accepted scientfic principles and field observations cannot be synthesized into an acceptablc prediction (to be checked out later) an impasse develops that requires a solution based on judgments other than science. A second line of objection is to call in question the validity of the radiation standards promulgated by the International Comaission on Radiological Protection, the National Comnittee on Radiation Protection and Pleasurements, and the Federal Radiation Council. The standards do contain an element,of judgment as to degree of effect relative to a given radiation exposure. Such judgnicn ts, howcvcr , are niade by radiological scientists of international reputation on the basis of sound data. Consequently when such standzrds are questioned the . .. .. problem becones part of a much broader issue. ... ._.i .... c. .._..._. ....... d. Studies of the long-term effects of nuclear explosions on human populations arc continuing
Recommended publications
  • Thephysiologist
    Published by the American Physiological Society – Integrating the Life Sciences from Molecule to Organism THEPHYSIOLOGIST March 2016 • Vol. 59/No. 2 89th President of APS Jane F. Reckelhoff A Matter of Opinion I am very honored and humbled to have Warning: Watch been chosen by the members of the American Out for Predatory Physiological Society to represent them as the 89th President beginning in April 2016. I would Publishers like to thank the membership for their support. I would also like to thank the mentors I have had Because of the publication schedule for along the way who have shaped my career as a The Physiologist, I am writing this piece physiologist. I have been a member of APS for the shortly after the New Year! Hopefully, past 25 years, and the Society has not only shaped each of you had an opportunity to relax, Jane F. Reckelhoff my scientific career but given me opportunities to enjoy family and friends, and, most be of service to fellow physiologists by allowing importantly, begin considering how to me to serve on various APS committees. I consider take advantage of the 6.6% increase in the role of President as another opportunity to serve the Society and am the NIH budget. While I too am looking excited to begin the task. forward to 2016, I was also pleasantly surprised to discover that even predatory As I read the editorials by my predecessors, I believe the Society faces Open Access (OA) publishers took some old challenges and also some new ones. I just listened to Ben time off over the Holidays.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rockefeller University Story
    CASPARY AUDITORIUM AND FOUNTAINS THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY STORY THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY STORY JOHN KOBLER THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY PRESS· 1970 COPYRIGHT© 1970 BY THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY PRESS LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUE CARD NO. 76-123050 STANDARD BOOK NO. 8740-015-9 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INTRODUCTION The first fifty years of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research have been recorded in depth and with keen insight by the medical his­ torian, George W. Corner. His story ends in 1953-a major turning point. That year, the Institute, which from its inception had been deeply in­ volved in post-doctoral education and research, became a graduate uni­ versity, offering the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to a small number of exceptional pre-doctoral students. Since 1953, The Rockefeller University's research and education pro­ grams have widened. Its achievements would fill a volume at least equal in size to Dr. Corner's history. Pending such a sequel, John Kobler, a journalist and biographer, has written a brief account intended to acquaint the general public with the recent history of The Rockefeller University. Today, as in the beginning, it is an Institution committed to excellence in research, education, and service to human kind. FREDERICK SEITZ President of The Rockefeller University CONTENTS INTRODUCTION V . the experimental method can meet human needs 1 You, here, explore and dream 13 There's no use doing anything for anybody until they're healthy 2 5 ... to become scholarly scientists of distinction 39 ... greater involvement in the practical affairs of society 63 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 71 INDEX 73 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Biomedical Research and Education Campus Publications
    Rockefeller University Digital Commons @ RU The Future of Biomedical Research and Education Campus Publications 1979 The Future of Biomedical Research and Education The Rockefeller University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/future-biomedical-research- education THE FUTURE OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION Four Talks on the Occasion of the Installation of Dr. Joshua Lederberg as President of The Rockefeller University OCTOBER 16, 1978 ACKNOWLEDGMENT This publication has been aided by a grant from The Carl and Lily Pforzheimer Foundation, Inc. Copyright © 1979 THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY Library of Congress Catalogue Number 79-66963 ISBN 87470-031-0 Printed in the United States of America Foreword On October 16, 1978, Joshua Lederberg was installed as pres­ ident of The Rockefeller University. A Nobel laureate and a major contributor to modern genetics, Dr. Lederberg succeeded Frederick Seitz, the distinguished physicist who served as pres­ ident for 10 years and under whose leadership The Rockefeller University Council was founded. As part of the installation activities, the Council sponsored a colloquium on the outlook for biomedical research and education from the vantage points of the University and its two nearest institutional neighbors-Memorial-Sloan Ketter­ ing Cancer Center and Cornell University Medical College. The three speakers not only provided unique insights based on their individual involvement in the scientific pursuit, but also voiced concerns shared by the institutions they represent. Some of the major themes emerging from the colloquium were explored, eloquently and trenchantly, by Dr. Lederberg in his installation address. We are indebted to the generosity of The Carl and Lily Pforzheimer Foundation that makes it possible to present these four statements to the wider audience they deserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twentieth-Century Science: a Case Study of Excellence in Biomedical Research
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers Working Paper Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers (2002) : Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research, WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50229 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu P 02 – 003 RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS AND MAJOR DISCOVERIES IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY SCIENCE: A CASE STUDY OF EXCELLENCE IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH J.
    [Show full text]
  • William T. Golden October 1950 – April 1951
    Impacts of the Early Cold War on the Formulation of U.S. Science Policy Selected Memoranda of William T. Golden October 1950 – April 1951 Edited with an Appreciation by William A. Blanpied Foreward by Neal Lane Copyright © 1995, 2000 American Association for the Advancement of Science 1200 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20005 The findings, conclusions, and opinions stated or implied in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Directors, Council, or membership of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. William T. Golden Contents Contents Foreword....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Preface ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................ 7 A Brief Biography ........................................................................................................................................ 8 William T. Golden’s Chronicle of an Era: An Appreciation ....................................................................... 9 Decision Memorandum F.J. Lawton, Decision Memorandum for the President, October 19, 1950................................................ 34 Conversations: 1950 Herman
    [Show full text]
  • Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twentieth-Century Science: a Case Study of Excellence in Biomedical Research Hollingsworth, J
    www.ssoar.info Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: a case study of excellence in biomedical research Hollingsworth, J. Rogers Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Arbeitspapier / working paper Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: SSG Sozialwissenschaften, USB Köln Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Hollingsworth, J. R. (2002). Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: a case study of excellence in biomedical research. (Papers / Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, 02-003). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-112976 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed
    [Show full text]
  • Special Libraries, September 1962
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Special Libraries, 1962 Special Libraries, 1960s 9-1-1962 Special Libraries, September 1962 Special Libraries Association Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1962 Part of the Cataloging and Metadata Commons, Collection Development and Management Commons, Information Literacy Commons, and the Scholarly Communication Commons Recommended Citation Special Libraries Association, "Special Libraries, September 1962" (1962). Special Libraries, 1962. 7. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1962/7 This Magazine is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Libraries, 1960s at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Libraries, 1962 by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPECIAL LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION Putting Knowledge to Work OFFICERS DIRECTORS President SARAAULL ETHELS. KLAHRE University of Houston Federal Reserve Bank of Clezeland, Clez'eland, Ohio Houston 4, Texas First Vice-president and President-Elect JOANM. HUTCHINSON MRS.MILDRED H. BRODE Research Center, Diamond Alkali David Taylor Model Bash, IVash~ngtoiz,D. C. Company, Painesville, Ohio Second Vice-president ROBERTW. GIBSON,JR. PAULW. RILEY College of Business Adminirtfatiun Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktouw Heights, New Yorh Boston College Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts Secretary MRS.JEANNE B. NORTH MRS.ELIZABETH B. ROTH Lochheed Missiles & Space Diz,ision. Pdo Alto, Standard Oil Company of Califor- California nia, San Francisco, California Treasurer EDWARDG. STRABLE RALPHH. PHELPS J. Walter Thompson Company Engineering Societies Library, New Yorh, New Yorh Chicago, Illinois Immediate Past-President hins. ELIZABETHR. USHER EUGENEB. JACKSON Metropolitan Museum of A!t Research Laboratories, General Moio~sCorporation New York, New Yorh Warren, Michigaiz EXECUTIVE SECRETARY: BILL M.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Science: the Paradoxes of Research and Education in the Sciences at Swarthmore College, 1935-1965
    Little Science: the Paradoxes of Research and Education in the Sciences at Swarthmore College, 1935-1965 By Darwin H. Stapleton Executive Director Emeritus, Rockefeller Archive Center [email protected] and Donna H. Stapleton, Retired City School District of New Rochelle, New York Read for the annual meeting of the History of Science Society, Cambridge, Massachusetts, November 22, 2003 © 2010 by Darwin H. Stapleton and Donna H. Stapleton Much of the history of American sciences in the mid-twentieth century has focused on the triumph of “big science,” based on the combination of federal funding, vast increases in the scale of instrumentation and experimentation, and the alliance of universities with agencies of government, particularly the military.1 This approach documents the vast and clearly consequential changes in American sciences that are necessary for understanding the creation of what President Dwight Eisenhower called the “military-industrial complex,” the space program, and the deep technological infrastructure that underpins most advanced science today. But it virtually ignores the education of the scientists themselves – without whom, after all, there would be no science. We became interested in this historical problem through researching and writing a book on Courtney C. Smith, president of Swarthmore College, 1953-1969.2 Though Smith himself, a former professor of English literature, did not have a strong interest in the sciences, our reading of his papers and our investigation of the years leading up to his presidency, convinced us that 1 the sciences at Swarthmore, a small liberal arts college, were vital, important, and worth examining more closely. Moreover, we have looked at several other small liberal arts colleges, such as Juniata, Oberlin, and Reed, which have had reputations for strong science programs, to see whether what we have observed at Swarthmore is part of a bigger story.
    [Show full text]
  • Frederick Seitz 1 9 1 1 – 2 0 0 8
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES FREDERICK SEITZ 1 9 1 1 – 2 0 0 8 A Biographical Memoir by CHARLES P. SLICHTER Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2010 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. Courtesy of the Rockefeller Archive Center. FREDERICK SEITZ July 4, 1911–March 2, 2008 BY CHARLES P . SLICHTER REDERICK SEITZ WAS A BRILLIANT SCIENTIST. He was one of the Ffounders of the field that became known as the physics of condensed matter; a wise and insightful leader of academic and scientific organizations; an influential spokesman for science nationally and internationally; a trusted counselor and adviser of many organizations. His contributions to the field of solid-state physics, to the National Academy of Sciences, and to The Rockefeller University were transforma- tive. Ever alert, he used his influence to help many scientists at crucial stages of their careers. He died in New York on March 2, 2008. I met Fred in 1949 when we both joined the faculty of the Department of Physics of the University of Illinois, he as research professor and I as a brand-new Ph.D. with the rank of instructor. Although he was only 8 years old, he was already a famous scientist. He had been elected a member of the American Philosophical Society in 1946, and he was elected a member of the National Academy of Sciences five years later. He was deeply and actively involved in solid-state physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9325485 Scientists and statesmen: President Eisenhower’s science advisers and national security policy, 1953-1961 Damms, Richard Vernon, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1993 Copyright ©1993 by Damms, Richard Vernon.
    [Show full text]
  • Krebs Collection Books (Octavos)
    Special Collections and Archives: Krebs Collection A collection of around 1250 items from the library of Sir Hans Krebs, Lecturer and subsequently Professor of Biochemistry at Sheffield from 1935 to 1954, and Nobel Prize Winner in 1953 for his work, along with Fritz Lipmann, in discovering in living organisms the series of chemical reactions known as the tricarboxylic acid cycle. For further biographical details, see the collection level description for the Krebs Papers (MS 116). The Krebs Collection consists of over 800 books and periodicals, which have been individually catalogued, and over 400 pamphlets, newspaper cuttings and reprints of journal articles, which have been listed. Some of the material has been annotated by Krebs. Books (octavos) International Neurochemical Conference (1965 : Oxford, England) Variation in chemical composition of the nervous system : as determined by developmental and genetic factors ; edited by G.B. Ansell on behalf of the National Committee of the International Neurochemical Conference, Oxford, 1965. - Oxford : Symposium Publications Division, Pergamon Press, 1966. [M0139812SH] Western Bank Library KREBS COLLECTION 1; 200673119 Reference. Inscribed with Hans Krebs' initials on half-title page. Western Bank Library KREBS COLLECTION 2; 200673120 Reference Ardenne, Manfred, Baron von, 1907- Eine glückliche Jugend im Zeichen der Technik ; Manfred von Ardenne. - Leipzig; Jena; Berlin : Urania Verlag, 1965. [M0135153SH] Western Bank Library KREBS COLLECTION 3; 200673014 Reference. Inscription on flyleaf by the author dated 7/7/66, and letter in reply from Krebs dated 14/7/66, pasted in at the back of the book. Ardenne, Manfred, Baron von, 1907- Ein glückliches Leben für Technik und Forschung : Autobiographie ; Manfred von Ardenne.
    [Show full text]
  • DETLEV WULF BRONK August 13,189/'-November 17,1975
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES D E T L E V W U L F B R O N K 1897—1975 A Biographical Memoir by F RANK BRINK, JR. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1978 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. DETLEV WULF BRONK August 13,189/'-November 17,1975 BY FRANK BRINK, JR. ETLEV WULF BRONK was born in 1897 in New York City, D where his father, Mitchell Bronk, was pastor of the Ascen- sion Baptist Church at 160th Street and Park Avenue. Det received his unusual Christian names through his mother, Marie Wulf, whose father was Detlev Wulf, a businessman in New York City. The family moved to Bayonne, New Jersey in 1900, where his sister, Isabelle, was born in 1903. His later youth (1912-1919) was spent in Troy, New York in the same region of the state where his forebears had lived for many years. Detlev Bronk is a direct descendant of Mattheus Brunck, a "smith" from the Rhenish Palatinate, who came to West Camp, on the Hud- son River, in 1710. A grandson of Mattheus, Abraham, settled about 1797 on a farm near Duanesburg, Schenectady county, which became known as "the Bronk Place." Det's grandfather, Abram Bronk, grew up in Florida, New York. In nearby Man- chester lived Cynthia Brewster, a descendant of the Elder William Brewster of the Mayflower Colony. Abram and Cynthia were married in 1856 after a prolonged courtship, much of it carried on by letter via packets to and from California.
    [Show full text]