MONTHLY REPORT February 20, 2001

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MONTHLY REPORT February 20, 2001 Famine Early Warning System NETwork - Zambia MONTHLY REPORT February 20, 2001 SUMMARY · Excessive rainfall in the northern half of Zambia has resulted in water logging in many areas. These include some high maize-producing areas of Eastern and Central Provinces. The extreme southern part of Zambia has experienced consistently dry conditions. Crops in part of these areas have wilted. · Southern Africa regional rainfall imagery shows persistent rainfall deficits in Zambia’s maize trading partners of Zimbabwe and South Africa during January. · The price of maize remained relatively stable from mid-January to first week of February, implying relative balance in supply and demand. · The real into-mill price of maize has been consistently much below that of the three previous years since July for Lusaka District and August for Choma District. · In the year 2001, government hopes to attain a 5% economic growth rate and bring down inflation from its current level of 30% to 17.5% by December. · The Kwacha appreciated significantly by about 23% against the U.S. dollar from early January to end of January. 1. AGROMETEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS Zambia is receiving normal to above-normal rainfall in line with the 2000/01 rainfall forecast. The rainfall in northern parts of the country has been mostly heavy, causing flash floods and water logging in many areas. The southern part has, on the other hand, been receiving mostly normal rainfall with the exception of the extreme southern part where some crops are reported by agrometeorologists to be at the permanent wilting point. In line with the forecast by Department of Meteorology, the country has so far received normal to above-normal rainfall, except for the extreme south. During the last half of January, Zambia received mostly heavy rains. According to the agrometeorologists, flash floods and water logging occurred in some parts of the country. This rainfall pattern was a result of the Inter Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) oscillating over most parts of the country except the far south. During the third dekad (ten-day period) of January, the northern half of the country A USAID Project managed by Chemonics International Inc. A USAID Project managed by Chemonics International Inc. Plot 30G Sable Rd P O Box 32481, Lusaka Tel: (260 1) 262750/1 Email: http:// www.fews.net Kabulonga Zambia Website: Fax: WWW.fews.net/reports (260 1) 262751 [email protected] FEWS NET Zambia Monthly Report – February 20, 2001 received substantial rainfall, similar to the rainfall received in the previous two dekads. Meteorologists have attributed this to continued dominance of the ITCZ. The highest rainfall was reported by Mpika (Northern Province) with 178 mm, followed by Kawambwa (Luapula Province) with 148 mm and Lusaka with 105 mm. The Department of Meteorology reported that in some areas, cumulative rainfall performance from July 1, 2000 to January 31, 2001 has been well above normal. These areas include Kasama, 44% above normal and Mpika (Northern Province) 41%, Mansa (Luapula Province) 41%, Petauke (Eastern Province) 29% and Kasempa (North-Western Province) 25%. The extreme southern parts, on the other hand, have been dry. For instance, Livingstone (Southern Province) reported rainfall deficit of 52% during the last dekad of January. Information from the Southern Province Meteorological Office indicated that rainfall in the southern parts of the province has been low in volume and poorly distributed. Generally, the crop in most parts of the country is at flowering to tasseling stage. In areas receiving excessive rainfall, water logging has been reported by agrometeorologists while in rainfall-deficit areas, some crops have wilted. 2. HAZARD CONDITIONS Areas experiencing excessive rainfall causing water logging in cropped fields include parts of Western Province (Kalabo, Kaoma, Lukulu and Mongu Districts), Luapula, Northern, Eastern and Central Provinces. Some of these are high grain-producing areas. Excessive rainfall normally leads to yellowing of plants and stunting as a result of leaching and therefore reduced yields. Loss of crops due to permanent wilting has been reported by agrometeorologists in parts of extreme southern Zambia. The regional rainfall picture shows relative dry conditions in Zambia’s major maize trading partners of Zimbabwe and South Africa during January. The rainfall pattern in Zambia so far has brought two extreme problems. During January, part of the country, specifically the northern and western parts (much of Northern, Luapula, Eastern and Western Provinces, Copperbelt and parts of Central Province) received heavy rains, resulting in water logging and flash floods in some of these areas. Infrastructure such as bridges and houses in some areas has been damaged. Areas reported by agrometeorologists as being the most affected are parts of Western (Kalabo, Kaoma, Lukulu and Mongu Districts), Luapula, Northern and Central Provinces. Others equally affected are most parts of Eastern Province (Mambwe, Lundazi, Katete, Chipata and Nyimba Districts). Among these affected areas are high maize- producing areas like Kaoma District and the districts of Eastern and Central Province. The extent of damage, if any, is yet to be established. In the extreme southern part of the country, on the other hand, rainfall has been scanty. According to the Department of Meteorology, during January these areas received poor rainfall. Affected areas include parts of Western and Southern Provinces (specifically the southern parts of Sesheke, Shang’ombo and Senanga and Sinazongwe Districts in Southern Province). Page 2 FEWS NET Zambia Monthly Report – February 20, 2001 According to Southern Province Meteorological Office, most crops in Livingstone, Kazungula, Gwembe and parts of Sinazongwe Districts have suffered so severely that they have reached the permanent wilting point. If rainfall performance improves, no recovery of the crop is expected, a condition also known as agronomic drought. The crop in the northern parts of the province was reported to be in favorable condition. In part of Senanga District, FEWS NET observed the rainfall deficit in the second week of January, as crops were already severely water stressed. With no improvement in the rainfall situation, it is likely that those crops reached permanent wilting point. Although these rainfall deficit areas are in relatively low producing areas, loss of crops will have serious implications for household food security. Looking at the regional rainfall pattern (Figures 1a and 1b), it is apparent that Zimbabwe and South Africa, Zambia’s major grain trading partners, experienced persistent relative dryness throughout January. Figure 1a. Estimated Rainfall (RFE) by Dekad, January 2001 1 – 10 January 2001 11 – 20 January 2001 21 – 31 January 2001 Figure 1b. Difference of Estimated Rainfall from Normal, January 2001 Difference: 1 – 10 January 2001 Difference: 11 – 20 January 2001 Difference: 21 – 31 January 2001 Source: USGS/FEWS NET Southern Africa Page 3 FEWS NET Zambia Monthly Report – February 20, 2001 Compared to average, the extreme southern part of Zambia, most parts of Zimbabwe and the northeastern part of South Africa consistently received below normal rainfall. If the situation continues, it will create a worrying situation for the southern Africa region with regard to maize grain availability. In view of the rainfall pattern, FEWS NET in collaboration with WFP, FAO and DMMU are making arrangements to visit some of the affected areas of North-Western Province, Eastern and Southern Provinces. The objective of the visit is to verify the situation and establish the extent of impact of excessive deficit rainfall on the crops. 3. FOOD SECURITY SITUATION The current season has been better than most recent years in terms of food security. The government’s Disaster Management and Mitigation Unit (DMMU) reported that areas likely to have food access problems are parts of Kaputa, Cadiz, Petauke, Nyimba, Lungwa, Kafue, Siavonga, Choma and Sinazongwe Districts. For Luangwa District, high grain prices seem to bear this out. Generally, the food security situation in the country during the current consumption year (May 2000 – April 2001) has been relatively good compared to most past recent years as a result of relatively good grain output from the April 2000 harvest. As indicated by low prices in the marketplaces, the grain supply has been relatively good. There have been comparatively fewer areas considered to be food insecure this year. Based on information as of early January from the Disaster Management and Mitigation Unit (DMMU), food insecure areas included parts of Kaputa (Northern Province); Chadiza, the Nyalugwe Area of Petauke District, Nyimba (Eastern Province); Luangwa, Kafue (Lusaka); Siavonga, Choma, Sinazongwe (Southern Province); and Chavuma and Zambezi (Northwestern Province). For Zambezi and Chavuma, food insecurity has been related to refugee influx from neighboring Angola. The Government sent food to displaced households who fled their homes in fear of village raids and other effects of the war. Food was also sent to the Chiawa area of Kafue and Luangwa Districts, which was adversely affected by the March 2000 floods. In the other areas, verification of the food situation was not done. It is important to note that that the 2000 Vulnerability Assessment was not conducted due to the lack of sufficient data. Current reports of flooding of lowland areas in Luangwa District need to be followed up and the situation needs close monitoring. Maize is mostly planted in the lowland (valley area) since the upland often receives insufficient rainfall. However, any effect of crop loss due to this situation is unlikely to be felt until after the harvest period. Press reports (February 16) indicated that the second Kariba spillway gate was opened in mid-February due to the water levels having slightly exceeded the 484.15m water level limit recommended by the Zambezi River Authority. This means that people living downstream in Luangwa, Chiawa (Lusaka Province) and Siavonga (Southern Province) areas might need to brace for possible further floods. Page 4 FEWS NET Zambia Monthly Report – February 20, 2001 4.
Recommended publications
  • Monthly Report January 19 – February 19, 2002 Summary
    Monthly Report January 19 – February 19, 2002 Summary • Zambia continued to experience a generally normal to below-normal rainy season. The dry spell in the southern parts of the country is of great concern as this has extended into some high- producing districts in Southern Province (Choma District), Western Province (Kaoma District) and the southern parts of Central Province. Crop yields in these areas are expected to be significantly reduced as a result. In some areas, crops have passed the permanent wilting point. • Zambia’s neighboring countries of Malawi, Mozambique, and particularly Zimbabwe have also experienced well-below normal rainfall this season. • Zambia’s food security situation continues to be of great concern, as the availability of staple food (maize) remains limited this late into the marketing season. Many households are also having problems purchasing maize as a result of exceptionally high prices. • The World Food Program started its relief food distribution program on January 24. So far, progress has been good despite the slow rate of relief food being brought into the country. Out of the estimated 42,000 MT requirement, only 12,000 MT has been purchased in South Africa for distribution to Zambia. Response from donors has been slow. As of February 12, 1,800 MT of maize was received from South Africa, all of which has been moved to the targeted districts. 1.0 Rainfall and Crop Condition 1.1 Rainfall Generally, the rainy season in Zambia so far has been characterized by normal to below-normal rainfall. Normal rainfall has been confined to northern and central parts of Zambia.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia USADF Country Portfolio
    Zambia USADF Country Portfolio Overview: Country program established in 1984 and reopened in U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: Keepers Zambia 2004. USADF currently manages a portfolio of 23 projects and one Country Program Coordinator: Guy Kahokola Foundation (KZF) Cooperative Agreement. Total active commitment is $2.9 million. Suite 103 Foxdale Court Office Park Program Manager: Victor Makasa Agricultural investments total $2.6 million. Youth-led enterprise 609 Zambezi Road, Roma Tel: +260 211 293333 investments total $20,000. Lusaka, Zambia Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Country Strategy: The program focuses on support to agricultural enterprises, including organic farming as Zambia has been identified as a Feed the Future country. In addition, there are investments in off-grid energy and youth led-enterprises. Enterprise Duration Grant Size Description Mongu Dairy Cooperative Society 2012-2017 $152,381 Sector: Agriculture (Dairy) Limited Town/City: Mongu District in the Western Province 2705-ZMB Summary: The project funds will be used to increase the production and sales of milk through the purchase of improved breed cows, transportation, and storage equipment. Chibusa Home Based Care 2013-2018 $187,789 Sector: Agriculture (Food Processing) Association Town/City: Mungwi District in the Northern Province of Zambia 2925-ZMB Summary: The project funds will be used to provide working capital for purchasing grains, increase milling capacity, build a storage warehouse, and provide funds to improve marketing. Ushaa Area Farmers Association 2013-2018 $94,960 Sector: Agriculture (Rice) Limited Town/City: Mongu District in the Western Province of Zambia 2937-ZMB Summary: The project funds will be used to provide working capital for purchasing rice, build a storage warehouse, and provide funds to improve marketing.
    [Show full text]
  • ZAMSTAR TB Prevalence Survey Monde Muyoyeta ZAMBART Project Primary Objective
    ZAMSTAR TB Prevalence Survey Monde Muyoyeta ZAMBART Project Primary Objective Measure the effect of the ZAMSTAR interventions on TB prevalence by comparing the prevalence of TB across study arms Secondary Objectives Determine the prevalence of culture positive tuberculosis in the study sites Measure the prevalence of risk factors for TB (HIV, diabetes, smoking, indoor air pollution, alcohol & SES) Determine the prevalence of people with current TB (self-reported) Determine health care seeking behavior of people with respiratory symptoms ZAMSTAR: The Zambia/South Africa TB and AIDS Reduction Study-Overview A study designed to find out whether combinations of community based interventions aimed at increasing case finding of TB and implementing packages of combined TB/HIV care can reduce TB Interventions were implemented for 3 years from 2006-2009 Prevalence of TB across study arms is one of the end points Study Setting ZAMSTAR ZAMSTAR Sites in Zambia Sites Luapula Mansa District-Senama, Central Copperbelt Ndola District-Chifubu and Chipulukusu Kitwe District-Chimwemwe, Ndeke Central Province Kabwe District-Makululu, Ngungu/Bwacha Lusaka Province Lusaka District-Chawama, Kanyama, Chipata, George Southern Province Choma District-Pemba and Shempande Livingstone District- Maramba and Dambwa Prevalence Survey -Sample Size & Enumeration 24 sites, 16 in Zambia and 8 in Western Cape- SA Sample size – 80 000 Zambia – 40 000 Western cape Enumeration – SEA are randomly visited – Every HH in the SEA is visited and enumerated MAPS with SEAS numbered
    [Show full text]
  • Chiefdoms/Chiefs in Zambia
    CHIEFDOMS/CHIEFS IN ZAMBIA 1. CENTRAL PROVINCE A. Chibombo District Tribe 1 HRH Chief Chitanda Lenje People 2 HRH Chieftainess Mungule Lenje People 3 HRH Chief Liteta Lenje People B. Chisamba District 1 HRH Chief Chamuka Lenje People C. Kapiri Mposhi District 1 HRH Senior Chief Chipepo Lenje People 2 HRH Chief Mukonchi Swaka People 3 HRH Chief Nkole Swaka People D. Ngabwe District 1 HRH Chief Ngabwe Lima/Lenje People 2 HRH Chief Mukubwe Lima/Lenje People E. Mkushi District 1 HRHChief Chitina Swaka People 2 HRH Chief Shaibila Lala People 3 HRH Chief Mulungwe Lala People F. Luano District 1 HRH Senior Chief Mboroma Lala People 2 HRH Chief Chembe Lala People 3 HRH Chief Chikupili Swaka People 4 HRH Chief Kanyesha Lala People 5 HRHChief Kaundula Lala People 6 HRH Chief Mboshya Lala People G. Mumbwa District 1 HRH Chief Chibuluma Kaonde/Ila People 2 HRH Chieftainess Kabulwebulwe Nkoya People 3 HRH Chief Kaindu Kaonde People 4 HRH Chief Moono Ila People 5 HRH Chief Mulendema Ila People 6 HRH Chief Mumba Kaonde People H. Serenje District 1 HRH Senior Chief Muchinda Lala People 2 HRH Chief Kabamba Lala People 3 HRh Chief Chisomo Lala People 4 HRH Chief Mailo Lala People 5 HRH Chieftainess Serenje Lala People 6 HRH Chief Chibale Lala People I. Chitambo District 1 HRH Chief Chitambo Lala People 2 HRH Chief Muchinka Lala People J. Itezhi Tezhi District 1 HRH Chieftainess Muwezwa Ila People 2 HRH Chief Chilyabufu Ila People 3 HRH Chief Musungwa Ila People 4 HRH Chief Shezongo Ila People 5 HRH Chief Shimbizhi Ila People 6 HRH Chief Kaingu Ila People K.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia USADF Country Portfolio
    Zambia USADF Country Portfolio Overview: Country program established in 1984 and re-established U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: Keepers Zambia in 2004. USADF currently manages a portfolio of 23 projects and Guy Kahokola, Country Program Coordinator Foundation (KZF) one Cooperative Agreement, and 4 off-grid energy projects. Total Suite 103 Foxdale Court Office Park Program Manager: Victor Makasa commitment is $3.6 million. Agricultural investments total $3.2 609 Zambezi Road, Roma Tel: +260 211 293333 million; off-grid energy total $0.4 million. Lusaka, Zambia Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Country Strategy: The program focuses on support to agricultural enterprises, including organic farming as Zambia has been identified as a Feed the Future country. Grantee Duration Value Summary Mongu Dairy Cooperative Society 2012-2017 $152,381 Sector: Agriculture (Dairy) Limited Beneficiaries: 169 dairy farmers 2705-ZMB Town/City: Mongu District in the Western Province Summary: The project funds will be used to increase the production and sales of milk through the purchase of improved breed cows, transportation, and storage equipment. Chibusa Home Based Care 2013-2018 $187,789 Sector: Agriculture (Food Processing) Association Beneficiaries: 260 maize, soya, groundnut and millet farmers 2925-ZMB Town/City: Mungwi District in the Northern Province of Zambia Summary: The project funds will be used to provide working capital for purchasing grains, increase milling capacity, build a storage warehouse, and provide funds to improve marketing. Ushaa Area Farmers Association 2013-2018 $94,960 Sector: Agriculture (Rice) Limited Beneficiaries: 751 rice farmers 2937-ZMB Town/City: Mongu District in the Western Province of Zambia Summary: The project funds will be used to provide working capital for purchasing rice, build a storage warehouse, and provide funds to improve marketing.
    [Show full text]
  • IRS Mop-Up Monitoring and Support Supervision Report
    Ministry of Health National Malaria Control Centre IRS Mop-up Monitoring and Support Supervision Report Health Services and Systems Program, Plot 8237 Nangwenya Road, Rhodespark, P. O. Box 39090, LUSAKA, ZAMBIA January, 2010 Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 1 2 General Objective ........................................................................................................ 1 3 Specific Objectives....................................................................................................... 1 4 Methodology................................................................................................................ 2 5 Report Outline............................................................................................................. 2 6 Observations................................................................................................................ 2 6.1 Team One............................................................................................................ 2 6.1.1 Coverage.......................................................................................................... 2 6.1.2 Status of Storage Facilities................................................................................ 3 6.1.3 Insecticide Stock Management ......................................................................... 4 6.1.4 Preparation Areas............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ZAMSTAR TB Prevalence Survey Monde Muyoyeta ZAMBART Project Primary Objective
    ZAMSTAR TB Prevalence Survey Monde Muyoyeta ZAMBART Project Primary Objective Measure the effect of the ZAMSTAR interventions on TB prevalence by comparing the prevalence of TB across study arms Secondary Objectives Determine the prevalence of culture positive tuberculosis in the study sites Measure the prevalence of risk factors for TB (HIV, diabetes, smoking, indoor air pollution, alcohol & SES) Determine the prevalence of people with current TB (self-reported) Determine health care seeking behavior of people with respiratory symptoms ZAMSTAR: The Zambia/South Africa TB and AIDS Reduction Study-Overview A study designed to find out whether combinations of community based interventions aimed at increasing case finding of TB and implementing packages of combined TB/HIV care can reduce TB Interventions were implemented for 3 years from 2006-2009 Prevalence of TB across study arms is one of the end points Study Setting ZAMSTAR ZAMSTAR Sites in Zambia Sites Luapula Mansa District-Senama, Central Copperbelt Ndola District-Chifubu and Chipulukusu Kitwe District-Chimwemwe, Ndeke Central Province Kabwe District-Makululu, Ngungu/Bwacha Lusaka Province Lusaka District-Chawama, Kanyama, Chipata, George Southern Province Choma District-Pemba and Shempande Livingstone District- Maramba and Dambwa Prevalence Survey -Sample Size & Enumeration 24 sites, 16 in Zambia and 8 in Western Cape- SA Sample size – 80 000 Zambia – 40 000 Western cape Enumeration – SEA are randomly visited – Every HH in the SEA is visited and enumerated MAPS with SEAS numbered
    [Show full text]
  • List of Districts of Zambia
    S.No Province District 1 Central Province Chibombo District 2 Central Province Kabwe District 3 Central Province Kapiri Mposhi District 4 Central Province Mkushi District 5 Central Province Mumbwa District 6 Central Province Serenje District 7 Central Province Luano District 8 Central Province Chitambo District 9 Central Province Ngabwe District 10 Central Province Chisamba District 11 Central Province Itezhi-Tezhi District 12 Central Province Shibuyunji District 13 Copperbelt Province Chililabombwe District 14 Copperbelt Province Chingola District 15 Copperbelt Province Kalulushi District 16 Copperbelt Province Kitwe District 17 Copperbelt Province Luanshya District 18 Copperbelt Province Lufwanyama District 19 Copperbelt Province Masaiti District 20 Copperbelt Province Mpongwe District 21 Copperbelt Province Mufulira District 22 Copperbelt Province Ndola District 23 Eastern Province Chadiza District 24 Eastern Province Chipata District 25 Eastern Province Katete District 26 Eastern Province Lundazi District 27 Eastern Province Mambwe District 28 Eastern Province Nyimba District 29 Eastern Province Petauke District 30 Eastern Province Sinda District 31 Eastern Province Vubwi District 32 Luapula Province Chiengi District 33 Luapula Province Chipili District 34 Luapula Province Chembe District 35 Luapula Province Kawambwa District 36 Luapula Province Lunga District 37 Luapula Province Mansa District 38 Luapula Province Milenge District 39 Luapula Province Mwansabombwe District 40 Luapula Province Mwense District 41 Luapula Province Nchelenge
    [Show full text]
  • Overall Grant Program Title
    FORM #3 Grants Solicitation and Management Quarterly Progress Report Grantee Name: Maternal and Child Survival Program Grant Number: # AID-OAA-A-14- 00028 Primary contact person regarding this report: Mira Thompson ([email protected]) Reporting for the quarter Period: Year 2, Quarter 4 (July to September 2018) 1. Briefly describe any significant highlights/accomplishments that took place during this reporting period. Please limit your comments to a maximum of 4 to 6 sentences. • Following the gaps that were identified during the routine TA visits to the districts in the first and second quarters, MCSP engaged the districts in the supported provinces in revising their 2018 annual workplans and budgets based on the data (scorecards) and service quality assessment (SQA) findings. Using these tools, MCSP influenced the inclusion of appropriate high-impact interventions (HIIs) to respond to identified gaps in the revised workplans and recommended the allocation of resources in an equitable manner. Consequently, Districts revised the 2018 CoC plans to incorporate these recommendations and identified interventions that would be included in the 2019 plans in all provinces. Additional details are provided in the provincial report annexes. • MCSP provided technical assistance (TA) during the provincial integrated management meeting (PIM) across all of the four target provinces. These meetings provided an opportunity for MCSP to identify areas requiring TA in a context-specific and responsive manner to the needs of each district. MCSP contributed to discussions in those meetings by making on-the-spot recommendations for improving specific indicators. For example, using a very brief role play, MCSP graphically showed districts a simple way of estimating the number of new FP acceptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Wildlife Authority 4
    Public Disclosure Authorized DESIGN E845 REPORT Vol. 8 Consultancy Services for Detailed Assessment, Prioritisation and Engineering design for Reinstating / Constructing of the Damaged and Washed Public Disclosure Authorized Away Crossings in Region 11: Lusaka, Southern, Western, Copperbelt and North- western Provinces of Zambia July 2006 - ! ,NO 'TANZANIA REP C80fKOP EHE Public Disclosure Authorized AN;6aNA'A I 'ab2Pe loko''i:. ''- -sf \ ZIMBABWE. BOSWN \ ° " Public Disclosure Authorized REGION!! Ll.SAKA, SOUTHERN, WESTERN, COPPERBFLTAND NORTHWFSTERN PROVINCES Assessment and Engineering I)esign of Damaged and Washed away Crossings SNCIASCO (Z) Led DESIGN REPORT CONTENTS List of Acronyms Preface 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.2 Objective 1.3 Scope of Services 1.4 Purpose of Report 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3. SURVEYS 3.1 Document Review 3.2 Copperbelt Province 3.3 Southern Province 3.4 Western Province 3.5 Northwestern Province 3.6 Chongwe and Chibombo 3.7 Zambia Wildlife Authority 4. DESIGN STANDARDS 4.1 Design Manual 4.2 Design of Small Bridges and Crossings 4.3 Drainage Design 4.4 Pavement Design 4.5 Road Furniture and Services 5. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 5.1 Traffic Patterns 5.2 Multiple-Criteria-Based Prioritisation of Crossings 6. HYDROLOGY AND DRAINAGE 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Survey Findings 6.3 Hydrological Data and Analysis 6.4 Drainage Design 6.5 Current Situation of Flood 7. GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS 7.1 General 7.2 Regional Geology 7.3 Soil 7.4 Materials 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REGION II -lLUSAKA, SOUTHERN, WESTFRN, COPPERBFELTANDNOR7HWFESTERN PROVINCES Assessnment and Engineering Design of Damaged and Washed away Crossings SVPCASCO (Z) Ltd 8.1 Environmental Assessment Process 8.2 Initial Environmental Examination and Environmental Project Brief 8.3 Environmental Management Plan 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report for the End of Program Evaluation of the C-Faarm Program
    FINAL REPORT FOR THE END OF PROGRAM EVALUATION OF THE C-FAARM PROGRAM DECEMBER, 2011 C-FAARM Program map: Evaluation conducted by: Lead evaluators: John Spilsbury Stephen Tembo Dorothy Nthani Revised and edited by: Meri Ghorkhmazyan (independent consultant) i ACKNWLEDGEMENTS This evaluation would not have been possible without the commitment, time and effort that all respondents and participants of the evaluation contributed. C-FAARM and the authors of the final evaluation report would like to express their gratitude to all program staff and beneficiaries for their endless patience, logistical support and openness in sharing programmatic information and their opinions. The support and time allocated by the interviewed ministry and district officials was valuable, and we are thankful that you were able to take part in this evaluation as your insights and suggestions are important for improving these types of interventions in Zambia. We wish to also acknowledge the financial support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Zambian Mission, and their continued input and flexibility throughout the program implementation. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNWLEDGEMENTS II TABLE OF CONTENTS III ACRONYMS VII 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 5 2.1. Context 5 2.2. The C-FAARM Program 6 2.3. Evaluation 7 3. METHODOLOGY 8 4. PROGRESS MADE (by Work Plan Strategic Objective (SO) and Intermediate Result (IR) 11 4.1. SO 1: By 2011, Vulnerable Households in targeted districts have diversified and/or increased their agricultural livelihoods in a sustainable manner 11 Indicator 1.1: Percentage of HH with improved livelihood score 11 Indicator 1.2: Number of months of adequate food provisioning 11 4.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX 1. Case Studies from Different Agro-Ecological Regions
    OFFICE OF EVALUATION Project evaluation series Final Evaluation of the Conservation Agriculture Scaling-Up (CASU) Project Funded by the European Union ANNEX 1. Case studies from different agro-ecological regions July 2018 PROJECT EVALUATION SERIES Final Evaluation of the Conservation Agriculture Scaling-Up (CASU) Project funded by the European Union (GCP/ZAM/074/EC) ANNEX 1. Case studies from different agro-ecological regions FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF EVALUATION July 2018 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Office of Evaluation (OED) This report is available in electronic format at: http://www.fao.org/evaluation The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO 2018 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.
    [Show full text]