In Substantially the Same Form As the Existing Rail 2 Rail MOU A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Substantially the Same Form As the Existing Rail 2 Rail MOU A Agenda NORTH COUNTY Item # TRANSIT DISTRICT jr 8 STAFF REPORT AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING TO CONTINUE THE RAIL 2 RAIL PROGRAM Time Sensitive OX Consent OX STAFF Authorize the Executive Director to finalize and execute a memorandum of RECOMMENDATION: understanding ( MOU) in substantially the same form as the existing Rail 2 Rail MOU after review and approval by General Counsel to continue the Rail 2 Rail program for one ( 1) additional one ( 1) year term expiring August 1, 2017 in an amount not -to -exceed $ 575, 300. BACKGROUND On August 1, 2013, NCTD entered into an MOU with Amtrak and CALTRANS INFORMATION: for continuation of the Rail 2 Rail program between Oceanside Transit Center OTC) and San Diego Santa Fe Depot on the San Diego subdivision. This service, which commenced operations in October 2013, provides additional service to NCTD COASTER customers outside peak hours, and increases flexibility for Amtrak customers to take a first train option. The service is provided under the following guidelines of the MOU. Rail 2 Rail Program — FY 2014 to Present: Amtrak stops six trains at all eight train stations between OTC and Santa Fe Depot. o Southbound departure from OTC to Santa Fe Depot at: 7: 00 p. m. 9: 24 p. m. 11: 53 p. m. o Northbound departure from Santa Fe Depot to OTC at: 8: 20 a. m. 10: 42 a. m. 9: 00 P. M. Passengers may use any valid COASTER fare ( single ride, round trip, day pass, or monthly pass) to board the six identified Amtrak trains. Passengers may use valid Amtrak fare ( single ride or monthly pass) to board any scheduled COASTER train. Amtrak conductors count the number of passengers with valid COASTER fares on Amtrak trains, and bill NCTD at the COASTER revenue per passenger rate of $ 4. 51 per passenger counted. NCTD code enforcement officers count the number of passengers with valid Amtrak fares on COASTER trains, and bill Amtrak at the COASTER revenue per passenger rate of $ 4. 51 per passenger counted. June 16, 2016 Board Meeting Staff Report No.: SR -16- 06- 008 Offering these six Amtrak trains to COASTER fare holders allows for increased use of available passenger rail capacity on the San Diego subdivision at minimal additional cost. The cost of placing six additional COASTER trains into service would total approximately $ 2. 8 million annually. For NCTD, this Rail 2 Rail program effectively increases service levels by six trains to COASTER customers at an annual cost of 84% less than operating additional trains, or a cost of approximately $ 447, 630. Since October 2013, the cost of the Rail 2 Rail Program to NCTD has ranged from 9% to 15% of the traditional cost to provide this level of service. FY 2014 ( October 2013 — June 30, 2014) 0 56, 274 boardings o $ 241, 000, or 9% of additional train cost FY 2015 0 97, 856 boardings o $ 418, 824, or 15% of additional train cost FY 2016 ( Projected) o 96, 362 boardings o $ 412, 429, or 15% of additional train cost FY 2017 ( Budget) o 99, 253 boardings o $ 447, 630, or 16% of additional train cost To date, this Rail 2 Rail program has proven to be a cost efficient and effective model for NCTD to increase service levels for COASTER customers, while also increasing service effectiveness for Amtrak as ridership increased through use of existing passenger rail capacity. Amtrak, CALTRANS, LOSSAN and NCTD have determined that continuation of this Rail 2 Rail program is in the best interest of the Parties and customers in the region. Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Executive Director to finalize and execute a memorandum of understanding ( MOU) in substantially the same form as the existing Rail 2 Rail MOU after review and approval by General Counsel to continue the Rail 2 Rail program for one ( 1) additional one ( 1) year term expiring August 1, 2017 in an amount not -to -exceed $ 575, 300. ATTACHMENT: 8A — Cooperative Agreement Between Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency, North County Transit District, and National Railroad Passenger Corporation For Continuation Of The Rail 2 Rail Program r;t61d_ 101 Td7Toa The fiscal impact of this staff report is not -to -exceed $ 575, 300 over one ( 1) year. The Rail 2 Rail services are included in the FY 2017 proposed operating budget with non - Federal Transit Administration ( FTA) grant funds and operating revenues from account 160. 508164, which has an FY 2017 budget of $ 575, 300 525, 300 for boardings and $ 50, 000 for security measures). If the Board approves this staff report, the balance of this account will be reduced to $ 0. Rail 2 Rail services for future fiscal years have been accounted for in the five year outlook, and will be budgeted accordingly in the future years operating budgets if the program is continued. COMMITTEE REVIEW: None STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Bailey, Chief Financial Officer E - ma IbU- yU i -2823 Approved and/ or authorized by the ardo' ors of the North County Transit June 16, 2016 Board Meeting Agenda Item No.: Staff Report No.: SR -16- 06- 008 DistJriccttByVJerk / Date, ATTACHMENT 8A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN LOS ANGELES — SAN DIEGO — SAN LUIS OBISPO RAIL CORRIDOR AGENCY, NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT, AND NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION FOR CONTINUATION OF THE RAIL 2 RAIL PROGRAM This Cooperative Agreement (" AGREEMENT"), is made and entered into on , 2016, by and between the Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency (" LOSSAN Agency"), the NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (" NCTD"), a public agency existing under the laws of the State of California, pursuant to California Public Utility Code Sections 125000, et seq., and the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (" AMTRAK"), a corporation organized under the Rail Passenger Service Act recodified at 49 U. S. C. § 24101 et. seq. and the laws of the District of Columbia and having its principal office and place of business in Washington, D. C., and ( LOSSAN Agency, NCTD and AMTRAK are each sometimes referred to herein as a " PARTY" and collectively referred to as " PARTIES"): RECITALS WHEREAS, the LOSSAN Agency is a joint powers authority as amended pursuant to Senate Bill 1225 Chapter 802, Statutes of 2012); WHEREAS, NCTD was created and exists pursuant to the North San Diego County Transit Development Board Act ( California Public Utility Code Section 125, 000 et seq.) to plan, construct and operate public transit systems within the northern portion of San Diego County. The commuter railroad portion of NCTD is hereafter called " COASTER"; WHEREAS, in California, AMTRAK operates state -supported intercity passenger train service along the Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo ( LOSSAN) rail corridor; this service is known as the Pacific Surfliner ( Service); WHEREAS, the LOSSAN Agency has assumed administrative and management responsibility for the Service as of July 1, 2015, and subsequent agreements for AMTRAK to operate the Service will be under contract of the LOSSAN Agency; Page 1 of 14 ATTACHMENT 8A WHEREAS, within NCTD commuter rail operating territory, the Service operates between NCTD' s Oceanside Station to the north and NCTD' s San Diego — Santa Fe Depot Station to the south, on rail rights of way over which NCTD also operates COASTER commuter rail service; WHEREAS, LOSSAN Agency, NCTD, and AMTRAK, desire to continue the Rail 2 Rail program Program") which authorizes AMTRAK and NCTD to accept certain tickets issued from each of their respective passenger rail services. In particular, COASTER ticketed passengers are permitted to ride any AMTRAK operated Pacific Surfliner train or AMTRAK operated bus listed in Appendix A, within the trip limits of their ticket. Similarly, AMTRAK Pacific Surfliner riders using monthly pass can ride any COASTER service within the trip limits of their ticket for no additional charge to the rider. In addition, NCTD and AMTRAK desire to continue a mutual aid agreement with this AGREEMENT. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual understandings of the PARTIES hereto, LOSSAN Agency, NCTD, and AMTRAK agree as follows: SECTION I NCTD AGREES: 1. To accept, at no additional cost to the rider, AMTRAK Pacific Surfliner fare media for travel on COASTER service within the trip limits of the AMTRAK fare media. 2. To work in earnest with AMTRAK and the LOSSAN Agency to develop a system for AMTRAK to capture station travel patterns for AMTRAK boardings with COASTER fare media. 3. To send to AMTRAK, no later than twenty ( 20) days after the end of each month, a report stating the number of passengers using AMTRAK fare media who traveled on COASTER trains during that month. Each report shall contain supporting documentation, which includes the number of tickets counted by COASTER service conductors or Fare Enforcement Officers. Said Page 2 of 14 ATTACHMENT 8A documentation shall be sorted by date and factored up by the ratio of total tickets counted compared with total daily ridership on the trains as reported by the conductors. All reports will be copied to the LOSSAN Agency. 4. To reimburse AMTRAK for each COASTER ticketed passenger traveling on AMTRAK operated Pacific Surfliner trains and AMTRAK buses within the trip limits of the COASTER fare media the amount shown under Reimbursement Rate in Appendix A, and adjusted every twelve months as defined in Section IV, paragraph 4. This amount will be offset by the same Reimbursement Rate for each passenger using AMTRAK fare media traveling on COASTER trains within the trip limits of the AMTRAK fare media. 5. Within thirty ( 30) days of receipt of an invoice, NCTD shall remit payment to AMTRAK the full amount due. 6. To work in earnest with AMTRAK and the LOSSAN Agency to sustain a safe and secure environment for customers and staff onboard both the COASTER and AMTRAK operated Pacific Surfliner trains operating under this AGREEMENT.
Recommended publications
  • Commuter Rail System Study
    TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Commuter Rail System Study Transit Committee March 11, 2010 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Study Purpose Study Requested by MAG Regional Council in 2008 Commuter Rail Study Funding in 2004 RTP Study Feasibility of Commuter Rail Service in MAG Region Ridership Forecasting and Cost Effectiveness Capital and Operating Cost Estimates Vehicle Technology Recommendation Implementation Requirements Copyright © 2009 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Peer Regions ~ Commuter Rail Systems WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? Peak Period, Peak Direction Service. Traditionally caries less daily riders than light rail, but for longer distances. Similar market and characteristics with Bus Rapid Transit / Express. SOUNDER-Seattle CALTRAIN-San Francisco ALTAMONT COMMUTER EXPRESS – San Jose Can share ROW and track with freight railroads and can operate concurrently (does not require exclusive right-of-way) . Typically longer station spacing (every 3-7 miles on average) than light rail (1-2 miles) with emphasis on park-and-rides and traditional city CBDs. Locomotive technology (diesel or clean/green hybrid Genset). Passenger coaches (push-pull). Engines and cars meets federally mandated structural requirements for rolling stock crash resistance Larger, heavier profile than light rail vehicles. METROLINK – Los Angeles COASTER – San Diego FRONT RUNNER – Salt Lake City-Ogden Higher max.speed (79mph), slower acceleration and deceleration than light rail. Average speed approx 44mph. Lower capital cost per mile ($10-$20M) due to existing right of way use / reuse. Light
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison Report
    Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison Report Public Review Draft October 2017 Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison October 2017 Research and Peer Review Research and Peer Review .................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 A Note on TCRP Sources ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Elasticity of Demand for Commuter Rail ............................................................................... 3 Definition ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Commuter Rail Elasticity ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Comparison with Peer Systems ............................................................................................ 4 Fares ................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Employer Programs ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California
    Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California Hollie M. Lund, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Robert Cervero, Ph.D. Professor of City and Regional Planning University of California at Berkeley Richard W. Willson, Ph.D., AICP Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Final Report January 2004 Funded by Caltrans Transportation Grant—“Statewide Planning Studies”—FTA Section 5313 (b) Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Acknowledgements This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers, practitioners and graduate students. We would like to thank all members involved for their efforts and suggestions. Project Team Members: Hollie M. Lund, Principle Investigator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Robert Cervero, Research Collaborator (University of California at Berkeley) Richard W. Willson, Research Collaborator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Marian Lee-Skowronek, Project Manager (San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit) Anthony Foster, Research Associate David Levitan, Research Associate Sally Librera, Research Associate Jody Littlehales, Research Associate Technical Advisory Committee Members: Emmanuel Mekwunye, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Val Menotti, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Planning Department Jeff Ordway, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Real Estate Department Chuck Purvis, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Doug Sibley, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Research Firms: Corey, Canapary & Galanis, San Francisco, California MARI Hispanic Field Services, Santa Ana, California Taylor Research, San Diego, California i Travel Characteristics of TOD in California ii Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Executive Summary Rapid growth in the urbanized areas of California presents many transportation and land use challenges for local and regional policy makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Southern California's Future on Track
    Keeping Southern California’s 25Future on Track CONTENTS Message from the Board Chair .........................1 CEO’s Message .....................................................3 A Quarter Century of Moving People: The Metrolink Story .............................................5 How It All Began ................................................19 Metrolink’s Top Priority: Safety .......................27 WHO WE ARE Environment ........................................................31 Metrolink is Southern California’s regional commuter rail service in its Metrolink Relieves Driving Stress ...................35 25th year of operation. Metrolink is governed by The Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), Board Members Past and Present ..................40 a joint powers authority made up of an 11-member board representing Metrolink Pioneering Staff the transportation commissions of Still on Board ......................................................47 Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura counties. Metrolink Employees Metrolink operates seven routes Put Customers First ...........................................48 through a six-county, 538-route-mile network with 60 stations. Facts at a Glance ...............................................50 For more information, including how to ride, go to www.metrolinktrains.com MISSION STATEMENT Our mission is to provide safe, efficient, dependable and on-time transportation service that offers outstanding customer experience and enhances quality of life. For
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Opportunities for Intelligent Transportation Systems in California's Passenger Intermodal Operations and Services
    UC Berkeley Research Reports Title Assessing Opportunities for Intelligent Transportation Systems in California's Passenger Intermodal Operations and Services Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4rk4p09t Authors Miller, Mark A. Loukakos, Dimitri Publication Date 2001-11-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California CALIFORNIA PATH PROGRAM INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Assessing Opportunities for Intelligent Transportation Systems in California’s Passenger Intermodal Operations and Services Mark A. Miller, Dimitri Loukakos California PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2001-34 This work was performed as part of the California PATH Program of the University of California, in cooperation with the State of California Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency, Department of Transportation; and the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Final Report for MOU 375 November 2001 ISSN 1055-1425 CALIFORNIA PARTNERS FOR ADVANCED TRANSIT AND HIGHWAYS Assessing Opportunities for Intelligent Transportation Systems in California's Passenger Intermodal Operations and Services Mark A. Miller Dimitri Loukakos November 9, 2001 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was conducted under the sponsorship of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Office of New Technology and Research (ONT&R) (Interagency Agreement #65A0013) and the authors especially acknowledge Bob Justice and Pete Hansra of ONT&R for their support of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • TROLLEY EXTENSION May Do So Using Any of the Following Methods: Post Until 3/12/2021
    Proposed Major The MTS Board of Directors will also hold a Public Hearing in March 2021 to consider these proposals, Take Service Changes prior to approval of any major service changes. If you wish One to comment on any proposal for the Public Hearing, you TROLLEY EXTENSION may do so using any of the following methods: Post Until 3/12/2021 In Fall 2021, the UC San Diego Blue Line light rail • Testimony at the • Our website, extension will open and expand the San Diego sdmts.com/Trolley-Extension Trolley system from Downtown San Diego to PUBLIC HEARING: the UTC Transit Center, serving nine new Trolley Thursday, March 11, 2021, Please use the comment form UC SAN DIEGO UC San DiegoExecutive DriveUTC stations. Health La Jolla 9:00 a.m. UC San Diego See box below. • U.S. Mail. Send to: MTS is also proposing to change the bus network Central Campus MTS Public Hearing Comments to connect people and communities to the Trolley VA Medical Center extension. Extensive rider and public outreach Blue Line • Telephone Hotline: 1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000, was conducted in 2018-2019 to collect ideas and Nobel Drive (619) 595-4912 feedback on potential changes.. The results of that (leave your comments as a San Diego, CA 92101 outreach, combined with detailed data analysis, Balboa Avenue resulted in the proposals detailed in this Take One. message on the voicemail) Clairemont Drive IN SUMMARY: • E-Mail: [email protected] • Current bus routes affected would include: Tecolote Road Routes 8, 9, 27, 30, 44, 50, 105, 150, and Green Line 201/202.
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Teleconference Board Meeting
    Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Nancy Young, City of Tracy Vice Chair, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Bob Elliott, San Joaquin County Commissioner, Debby Moorhead, City of Manteca Commissioner, Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Commissioner, John Marchand, City of Livermore Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE BOARD MEETING Call-In Information: 1 (872) 240-3412 Conference Access Code: 442-680-861 GoToMeeting Link: https://www.gotomeet.me/acerail/sjrrc-board-meeting-april SPECIAL NOTICE Coronavirus COVID-19 In accordance with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board Members will be attending this meeting via teleconference. Members of the public may observe the meeting by dialing 1 (872) 240-3412 with access code: 442-680-861 or log-in using a computer, tablet or smartphone at GoToMeeting.com using link: https://www.gotomeet.me/acerail/sjrrc-board-meeting-april. Please note that all members of the public will be placed on mute until such times allow for public comments to be made. If a person wishes to make a public comment during the meeting, to do so they must either 1) use GoToMeeting and will have the option to notify SJRRC staff by alerting them via the “Chat” function or they can 2) contact SJRRC staff via email at [email protected] in which staff will read the comment aloud during the public comment period. Public comments will be limited to two (2) minutes per comment. This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Oceanside Transit Center Platform Improvement Project Fact Sheet
    Transportation OCEANSIDE TRANSIT CENTER PLATFORM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FACT SHEET TOTAL COST: $23.6 million The Project CAMP The Oceanside Transit Center (OTC) is one of PENDLETON COMPLETION: 2017 the busiest in the San Diego region, where 5 more than 1.2 million passengers annually Vandegrift Blvd. board trains and buses. The station connects 76 transit services between San Diego, Orange, Riverside, and Los Angeles counties. VISTA To enhance regional transit service, SANDAG OCEANSIDE 78 and the North County Transit District (NCTD) are undertaking an expansion of the transit Carlsbad Dr. center to increase the number of trains that Village TR OF ANS NT P E O can board passengers simultaneously and M R T T A R T A I Palomar Airport Rd. O P allow freight trains to move through the E N D U N A station while passenger trains are boarding. CARLSBAD C IT I E R D E S M TA F A TES O Planned improvements include adding a third rail track in the center of the railroad right-of-way, building a new 1,000-foot-long TR OF ANS NT P E O M R boarding platform to the south, adding a T T A R T A I O P E N new passenger walkway at the southern D U N A C IT I end of the transit center, and modifying E R D E M ST A ATES OF existing boarding platforms, as needed. After the project is done, Metrolink and COASTER trains will be able to use the new track, leaving the two existing main rail lines available for Amtrak Pacific Surfliner and passing freight trains.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail
    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PASSENGER RAIL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TECHNICAL REPORT DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 3 ANALYTICAL APPROACH 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6 STRATEGIES 27 NEXT STEPS 44 CONCLUSION 45 TECHNICAL REPORT PASSENGER RAIL DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT connectsocal.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM This Connect SoCal Passenger Rail report lays out a vision of passenger rail services for the SCAG Region for the next three decades. It demonstrates Passenger Rail the progress that has been made over the last two decades in terms of growing ridership, new rail services, capital improvements and new funding opportunities. It demonstrates the regional importance and significance of passenger rail in the SCAG region, and why growing rail services by increasing frequencies in underserved corridors, as well as establishing service in unserved markets, is crucial to the future mobility and sustainability of our region. The report highlights recent success in establishing new funding opportunities for passenger rail, including the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) and Senate Bill (SB) 1. Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner intercity rail service is benefiting from these new funding opportunities as well as recent institutional arrangements that establish local control for the service. The Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE) program is an ambitious
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 102 – Transit-Oriented
    TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 102 Transit-Oriented Sponsored by Development in the the Federal United States: Transit Administration Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2004 (Membership as of January 2004) SELECTION COMMITTEE (as of January 2004) OFFICERS CHAIR Chair: Michael S. Townes, President and CEO, Hampton Roads Transit, Hampton, VA J. BARRY BARKER Vice Chair: Joseph H. Boardman, Commissioner, New York State DOT Transit Authority of River City Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS MEMBERS KAREN ANTION MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT Karen Antion Consulting SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC GORDON AOYAGI Montgomery County Government E. DEAN CARLSON, Director, Carlson Associates, Topeka, KS RONALD L. BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Central Ohio Transit Authority DOUGLAS G. DUNCAN, President and CEO, FedEx Freight, Memphis, TN LINDA J. BOHLINGER GENEVIEVE GIULIANO, Director, Metrans Transportation Center and Professor, School of Policy, HNTB Corp. Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles ANDREW BONDS, JR. BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Prof. of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University JENNIFER L. DORN JAMES R. HERTWIG, President, Landstar Logistics, Inc., Jacksonville, FL FTA HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR. ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Metropolitan Atlanta RTA RONALD F. KIRBY, Director of Transportation Planning, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments CONSTANCE GARBER HERBERT S. LEVINSON, Principal, Herbert S. Levinson Transportation Consultant, New Haven, CT York County Community Action Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Funding 101
    Caltrain Funding 101 Prepared for: SFMTA Board Meeting Prepared by: Caltrain Staff Date: February 7, 2012 Caltrain Funding 101 Overview • Funding contribution is guided by Joint Powers Agreement • Funding for Caltrain Operations • Funding for Caltrain Capital Projects 2 Funding for Caltrain Operations • Member Agencies provide operating contributions to the JPB according to the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) • After fares and other funding sources, the JPA provides that each member subsidize the operating budget based upon each county’s morning peak hour boarding • In FY2006, the Members agreed to an annual increase of 3% • Since FY2009, Member contributions have been frozen • In FY2011, SamTrans reduced its contributions, but did “fund swaps” to keep its contribution near FY2010 levels for FY2011 and FY2012 3 Summary of FY2012 Budget (in millions) Total Revenues % Total Expenses % Fares $ 54.0 50% Rail Op Contract & Maint $ 63.0 59% Parking 3.0 3% Contract Transition Costs 4.7 4% Other Income 5.8 5% Fuel 15.2 14% AB434 & Grants 10.3 10% Other Operating Expenses 11.7 11% Member 25.3 24% Administrative 10.6 10% Agencies Other Sources 9.0 8% Long-term Debt 1.1 1% Total Revenue $107.4 100% Total Expenses $106.3 100% Revenue over Expenses $ 1.1 4 Commuter Railroads FareBox Recovery Ratio Comparison Caltrain’s farebox recovery ratio is comparable with other commuter rail systems in the country. 70.0% 58.9% 60.0% 51.2% 47.4% 46.1% 50.0% 36.7% 40.0% 30.0% 18.4% 20.0% 14.0% 9.5% 10.0% 0.0% CalTrain ACE VRE LIRR Tri-Rail Coaster Front Runner Rail
    [Show full text]