<<

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Notices 57421

with regard to this program, which had Public Comment DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE the lowest rate in the Preliminary Determination among the programs Case briefs or other written comments International Trade Administration may be submitted to the Assistant alleged to be inconsistent with the SCM [A–570–073] Agreement. In so doing, we intend to Secretary for Enforcement and limit the corresponding offset to the Compliance no later than seven days Antidumping Duty Investigation of dumping margin (if one is found) in the after the date on which the last Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From companion antidumping duty verification report is issued in this the People’s Republic of : investigation, which best fulfills our investigation. Rebuttal briefs, limited to Affirmative Final Determination of statutory mandate ‘‘to ensure that the issues raised in case briefs, may be Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value party does not obtain a more favorable submitted no later than five days after result by failing to cooperate than if it the deadline date for case briefs.20 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, had cooperated fully,’’ 18 and induce Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and International Trade Administration, future cooperation by companies in (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or Department of Commerce. investigations where the petitioners rebuttal briefs in this investigation are SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce allege the existence of programs encouraged to submit with each (Commerce) determines that common potentially inconsistent with the SCM argument: (1) A statement of the issue; alloy aluminum sheet (common alloy Agreement. (2) a brief summary of the argument; sheet) from the People’s Republic of 21 China (China) is being, or is likely to be, Because we preliminarily find that the and (3) a table of authorities. sold in the United States at less-than- ‘‘Export Assistance Grants’’ program is Electronically filed documents must fair value (LTFV) for the period of export contingent, we preliminarily find be received successfully in their entirety investigation (POI) April 1, 2017, that the criterion under section by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due through September 30, 2017. 703(e)(1)(A) of the Act has been met. In dates established above.22 addition, for the purposes of the DATES: Applicable November 15, 2018. ‘‘massive imports’’ analysis, we Suspension of Liquidation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Hoefke or Julie Geiger, AD/CVD preliminarily determine, pursuant to In accordance with section Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and section 776(b) of the Act, that Fasa 703(e)(2)(A) of the Act, for Fasa Compliance, International Trade Industrial and Hero Stone shipped Industrial and Hero Stone, we will Administration, U.S. Department of quartz surface products in ‘‘massive’’ direct U.S. Customs and Border quantities during the comparison Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone period, thereby fulfilling the criteria of any unliquidated entries of subject 19 (202) 482–4947 and (202) 482–2057, under section 703(e)(1)(B) of the Act. merchandise from the China entered, or As a result, we preliminarily determine respectively. withdrawn from warehouse for that critical circumstances exist with consumption, on or after June 23, 2018, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: regard to Fasa Industrial and Hero which is 90 days prior to the date of Stone. Background publication of the Preliminary On June 6, 2018, Commerce published All Other Companies Determination in the Federal Register. For such entries, CBP shall require a in the Federal Register the Preliminary We based the all-others rate applied Determination and invited interested cash deposit equal to the estimated 1 in the Preliminary Determination on the preliminary subsidy rates established parties to comment. On August 8, 2018, rate preliminarily calculated for Foshan for Fasa Industrial and Hero Stone in Commerce published in the Federal Yixin. As noted above, we preliminarily the Preliminary Determination. This Register the Amended Preliminary Determination.2 A summary of the found that Foshan Yixin did not use any suspension of liquidation will remain in events that occurred since Commerce countervailable subsidies inconsistent effect until further notice. with the SCM Agreement. As a result, published the Preliminary we also preliminarily determine that all ITC Notification Determination, as well as a full other exporters of subject merchandise discussion of the issues raised by parties from China not selected as mandatory In accordance with section 703(f) of for this final determination, may be respondents did not use countervailable the Act, we will notify the ITC of this found in the Issues and Decision subsidies inconsistent with the SCM preliminary determination of critical Memorandum that is dated concurrently Agreement, and thus preliminarily find circumstances. with this determination and hereby that critical circumstances do not exist This determination is issued and adopted by this notice.3 with respect to the companies covered published pursuant to sections 703(f) by the all-others rate. and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 1 See Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic Final Determination Dated: November 8, 2018. of China: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Gary Taverman, Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value, Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstance, We will make a final determination Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Postponement of Final Determination, 83 FR concerning critical circumstances in the and Countervailing Duty Operations, 29088 (June 22, 2018) (Preliminary Determination) final determination of this investigation, performing the non-exclusive functions and and accompanying Preliminary Decision which is currently scheduled for duties of the Assistant Secretary for Memorandum. 2 January 28, 2019. Enforcement and Compliance. See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Preliminary [FR Doc. 2018–24941 Filed 11–14–18; 8:45 am] Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than 18 Statement of Administrative Action BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Fair Value, 83 FR 39056 (August 8, 2018) (Amended accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Preliminary Determination). H.R. Doc. 103–316, Vol. 1 (1994) at 870, reprinted 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision in 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. 4040, 4199. 20 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). Memorandum for the Final Results of the 19 See Critical Circumstances Allegation at 21 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). Antidumping Duty Investigation of Common Alloy Exhibit 1. 22 See 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1). Continued

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Nov 14, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM 15NON1 khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES 57422 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Notices

The Issues and Decision We used standard verification Mingtai’s margin calculation since the Memorandum is a public document and procedures, including an examination of Preliminary Determination. For Mingtai, is on file electronically via Enforcement relevant accounting and financial we calculated U.S. price and normal and Compliance’s Antidumping and records, and original source documents value using the same methodology Countervailing Duty Centralized provided by Mingtai. stated in the Preliminary Determination, Electronic Service System (ACCESS). except as follows: Period of Investigation ACCESS is available to registered users • We revised the surrogate value for at http://access.trade.gov and is The POI is April 1, 2017, through Mingtai’s argon factor of production available to all parties in the Central September 30, 2017. using data from Bulgaria instead of Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Analysis of Comments Received South Africa. Department of Commerce building. In • addition, a complete version of the The issues raised in the case and We revised the surrogate value for Issues and Decision Memorandum can rebuttal briefs that were submitted by Mingtai’s prompt aluminum scrap factor be accessed directly at http:// parties are discussed in the Issues and of production. enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Decision Memorandum. A list of the • We revised Mingtai’s normal value Issues and Decision Memorandum and issues that parties raised, and to which calculation by: (1) Disallowing a the electronic version are identical in we responded in the Issues and claimed by-product offset; and (2) content. Decision Memorandum, is attached to treating run-around aluminum scrap as this notice at Appendix II. Scope Comments a direct material input, not as a by- Final Affirmative Determination, in product. We invited parties to comment on Part, of Critical Circumstances Commerce’s Scope Comments China-Wide Entity Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4 In the Preliminary Determination, we For the final determination, we Commerce has reviewed the briefs found that critical circumstances exist continue to find that the China-wide submitted by interested parties, for to Nanjie Resources Co., Limited entity, which includes certain Chinese considered the arguments therein, and (Nanjie), Yong Jie New Material Co., exporters and/or producers that did not has made no changes to the scope of the Ltd. (Yong Jie New Material), and respond to Commerce’s requests for investigation. For further discussion, see Zhejiang Yongjie Aluminum Co., Ltd. information, including mandatory Commerce’s Scope Comments Final (Yongjie Aluminum) (collectively, respondents GKO Aluminium and the Decision Memorandum.5 Yongjie Companies); Zhejiang GKO Aluminium Stock Co., Ltd. (GKO Yongjie Companies, failed to provide Methodology Aluminium); the companies eligible for necessary information, failed to provide information in a timely manner, and Commerce conducted this a separate rate; and the China-wide significantly impeded this proceeding investigation in accordance with section entity.7 After analyzing comments by not submitting the requested 731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as received from interested parties information. We also continue to find amended (the Act). For a full regarding our preliminary critical that the China-wide entity failed to description of the methodology circumstances determinations, we cooperate to the best of its ability. As a underlying our final determination, see continue to find that, in accordance result, we continue to rely on AFA in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. with section 735(a)(3) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.206, critical circumstances determining the rate for the China-wide Scope of the Investigation exist with respect to Nanjie, the Yongjie entity and, as AFA, we select the highest rate listed in the initiation of the The merchandise covered by this Companies, GKO Aluminium, the investigation (i.e., 59.72 percent), which investigation is common alloy sheet companies eligible for a separate rate, is greater than the revised weighted- from China. For a complete description and the China-wide entity.8 average dumping margin of Mingtai (i.e., of the scope of this investigation, see Use of Adverse Facts Available (AFA) 49.85 percent).9 Appendix I. For the final determination we Combination Rates Verification continue to rely upon facts otherwise As provided in section 782(i) of the available, with adverse inferences Consistent with Preliminary Act, in July, we conducted verification (AFA), for the China-wide entity, the Determination 10 and Policy Bulletin of the questionnaire responses Yongjie Companies, and GKO 05.1,11 Commerce calculated submitted by Henan Mingtai Industrial Aluminium, pursuant to sections 776(a) combination rates for the respondents Co., Ltd. and Mingtai and (b) of the Act. that are eligible for a separate rate in (collectively, Mingtai). We issued this investigation. Changes Since the Preliminary verification reports on August 28, 2018.6 Determination Final Determination Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of Based on our review and analysis of The final weighted-average China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby the comments received from parties, adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision antidumping margins are as follows: Memorandum). and minor corrections presented at 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum verification, we made certain changes to 9 See Issues and Decision Memorandum, at 5–7. Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Scope 10 See Preliminary Determination, 83 FR at Comments Preliminary Decision Memorandum,’’ Industrial Co., ltd. and Zhengzhou Mingtai Industry 29089–29090. dated June 15, 2018. Co., Ltd. in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation 11 See Enforcement and Compliance’s Policy 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum of Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the Bulletin No. 05.1, regarding, ‘‘Separate-Rates Sheet from the People’s Republic of China: Scope People’s Republic of China,’’ dated August 28, Practice and Application of Combination Rates in Comments Final Decision Memorandum,’’ dated 2018. Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market concurrently with this memorandum. 7 See Preliminary Determination, 83 FR at 29089. Economy Countries,’’ (April 5, 2005) (Policy 6 See Commerce Memoranda, ‘‘Verification of the 8 See Issues and Decision Memorandum, at Bulletin 05.1), available on Commerce’s website at Questionnaire Responses of Henan Mingtai Al Comment 2. http://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Nov 14, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM 15NON1 khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Notices 57423

Cash deposit Weighted- adjusted for Exporter Producer average subsidy margin offset (percent) (percent)

Henan Mingtai Al Industrial Co., Ltd./Zhengzhou Henan Mingtai Al Industrial Co., Ltd./Zhengzhou 49.85 49.85 Mingtai Industry Co., Ltd. Mingtai Industry Co., Ltd. Alcha International Holdings Limited ...... Jiangsu Alcha Aluminium Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Alumax Composite Material (Jiangyin) Co., Ltd ...... Chalco Ruimin Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Granges Aluminum () Co., Ltd ...... Granges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Henan Founder Beyond Industry Co., Ltd ...... Henan Xintai Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Huafon Nikkei Aluminium Corporation ...... Huafon Nikkei Aluminium Corporation ...... 49.85 49.85 Jiangsu Lidao New Material Co., Ltd ...... Henan Jinyang Luyue Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Jiangsu Lidao New Material Co., Ltd ...... Jiangsu Zhong He Aluminum Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Jiangyin Litai Ornamental Materials Co., Ltd ...... Jiangyin Litai Ornamental Materials Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Jiangyin New Alumax Composite Material Co. Ltd ...... Chalco Ruimin Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Fuhai Industrial Co., Ltd ...... Shandong Fuhai Industrial Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Zhongwang Aluminium Co., Ltd ...... Tianjin Zhongwang Aluminium Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Xiashun Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd ...... Xiamen Xiashun Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Jintai International Trade Co., Ltd ...... Shandong Nanshan Aluminium Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd ...... Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Zhengzhou Silverstone Limited ...... Henan Zhongyuan Aluminum Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Zhengzhou Silverstone Limited ...... Xinlong Aluminum Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Zhengzhou Silverstone Limited ...... Shanghai Dongshuo Metal Trade Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85 Zhengzhou Silverstone Limited ...... Zhengzhou Mingtai Industry Co., Ltd ...... 49.85 49.85

China-Wide Entity 12 ...... 59.72 59.72

Disclosure margin listed for that combination in the does exist, Commerce will issue an We intend to disclose to parties in table; (2) for all combinations of Chinese antidumping duty order directing CBP this proceeding the calculations producers/exporters of merchandise to assess, upon further instruction by performed for this final determination under consideration that have not Commerce, antidumping duties on all within five days of the date of public established eligibility for their own imports of the subject merchandise announcement of our final separate rates, the cash deposit rate will entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, determination, in accordance with 19 be equal to the estimated weighted- for consumption on or after the effective CFR 351.224(b). average dumping margin established for date of the suspension of liquidation, as the China-wide entity; and (3) for all discussed above in the ‘‘Suspension of Suspension of Liquidation third-county exporters of merchandise Liquidation’’ section. under consideration not listed in the In accordance with section Notification Regarding Administrative table above, the cash deposit rate is the 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, for this final Protective Orders determination, we will direct U.S. cash deposit rate applicable to the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to Chinese producer/exporter combination This notice will serve as a reminder continue to suspend liquidation of all (or the China-wide entity) that supplied to the parties subject to administrative entries of common alloy sheet from that third country exporter. These protective order (APO) of their China, as described in Appendix I of suspension of liquidation instructions responsibility concerning the this notice, which are entered, or will remain in effect until further notice. disposition of propriety information withdrawn from warehouse, for disclosed under APO in accordance International Trade Commission consumption on or after June 6, 2018, with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely Notification the date of publication in the Federal written notification of return or Register of the affirmative Preliminary In accordance with section 735(d) of destruction of APO materials or Determination. Further, pursuant to the Act, we will notify the International conversion to judicial protective order is section 733(d)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 Trade Commission (ITC) of the final hereby requested. Failure to comply CFR 351.205(d), Commerce will instruct affirmative determination of sales at with the regulations and terms of an CBP to require a cash deposit equal to LTFV. Because Commerce’s final APO is a sanctionable violation. the weighted average amount by which determination is affirmative, in Return or Destruction of Proprietary normal value exceeds U.S. price, as accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Information indicated in the chart above as follows: Act, the ITC will make its final (1) For the producer/exporter determination as to whether the In the event the ITC issues a final combinations listed in the table above, domestic industry in the United States negative injury determination, this the cash deposit rate is equal to the is materially injured, or threatened with notice serves as the only reminder to estimated weighted-average dumping material injury, by reason of imports or parties subject to an APO of their sales (or the likelihood of sales) for responsibility concerning the 12 The China-wide entity also includes the importation of common alloy sheet, no destruction of proprietary information following companies that filed separate rate applications: Nanjie Resources Co., Limited, Yong later than 45 days after this final disclosed under APO in accordance Jie New Material Co., Ltd., and Zhejiang Yongjie determination. If the ITC determines with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely Aluminum Co., Ltd., Zhejiang GKO Aluminium that such injury does not exist, this written notification of the return or Stock Co., Ltd.; Alnan Aluminium Inc.; Chalco proceeding will be terminated and all destruction of APO materials, or Ruimin Co., Ltd.; CHALCO–SWA Cold Rolling Co., Ltd.; Luoyang Wanji Aluminium Processing Co., cash deposits posted will be refunded. conversion to judicial protective order, Ltd.; and Wanji Global (Singapore) PTE. LTD. If the ITC determines that such injury is hereby requested. Failure to comply

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Nov 14, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM 15NON1 khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES 57424 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 221 / Thursday, November 15, 2018 / Notices

with the regulations and terms of an 7606.11.3060, 7606.11.6000, 7606.12.3090, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of APO is a violation subject to sanction. 7606.12.6000, 7606.91.3090, 7606.91.6080, the Export Trading Company Act of 7606.92.3090, and 7606.92.6080. Further, 1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) (‘‘the Act’’) Notification to Interested Parties merchandise that falls within the scope of authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to This determination is issued and this investigation may also be entered into issue Export Trade Certificates of published in accordance with sections the United States under HTSUS subheadings 7606.11.3030, 7606.12.3030, 7606.91.3060, Review. An Export Trade Certificate of 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 7606.91.6040, 7606.92.3060, 7606.92.6040, Review protects the holder and the CFR 351.210(c). 7607.11.9090. Although the HTSUS members identified in the Certificate Dated: November 5, 2018. subheadings are provided for convenience from State and Federal government Gary Taverman, and customs purposes, the written antitrust actions and from private treble description of the scope of this investigation damage antitrust actions for the export Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping is dispositive. and Countervailing Duty Operations, conduct specified in the Certificate and performing the non-exclusive functions and Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed carried out in compliance with its terms duties of the Assistant Secretary for in the Issues and Decision and conditions. The regulations Enforcement and Compliance. Memorandum implementing Title III are found at 15 CFR part 325 (2018). OTEA is issuing Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation I. Summary this notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b), The merchandise covered by this II. List of Issues which requires the Secretary of investigation is aluminum common alloy III. Background Commerce to publish a summary of the IV. Period of Investigation sheet (common alloy sheet), which is a flat- certification in the Federal Register. rolled aluminum product having a thickness V. Scope of Investigation VI. Scope Comments Under Section 305(a) of the Act and 15 of 6.3 mm or less, but greater than 0.2 mm, CFR 325.11(a), any person aggrieved by in coils or cut-to-length, regardless of width. VII. Changes from the Preliminary Common alloy sheet within the scope of this Determination the Secretary’s determination may, investigation includes both not clad VIII. Adjustment Under Section 777A(F) of within 30 days of the date of this notice, aluminum sheet, as well as multi-alloy, clad the Act bring an action in any appropriate aluminum sheet. With respect to not clad IX. Selection and Corroboration of the district court of the United States to set aluminum sheet, common alloy sheet is Adverse Facts Available Rate aside the determination on the ground manufactured from a 1XXX-, 3XXX-, or X. Discussion of the Issues that the determination is erroneous. 5XXX-series alloy as designated by the Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts Aluminum Association. With respect to Available (AFA) Description of Certified Conduct multi-alloy, clad aluminum sheet, common Comment 2: Critical Circumstances ALCC’s Export Trade Certificate of alloy sheet is produced from a 3XXX-series Determination Comment 3: Surrogate Country Review has been amended to: core, to which cladding layers are applied to 1. Add the following companies as either one or both sides of the core. Comment 4: Surrogate Value for Aluminum Scrap new Members of the Certificate within Common alloy sheet may be made to the meaning of section 325.2(l) of the ASTM specification B209–14, but can also be Comment 5: Surrogate Value for Argon made to other specifications. Regardless of Comment 6: Mingtai’s Aluminum Scrap Regulations (15 CFR 325.2(l)): specification, however, all common alloy Comment 7: Separate Rate Status for Wanji a. Alaskan Leader Vessel LLC, Lynden, sheet meeting the scope description is Global and Luoyang Wanji WA included in the scope. Subject merchandise Comment 8: Separate Rate Status for b. Bristol Leader Fisheries LLC, Lynden, includes common alloy sheet that has been Tianjin Zhongwang WA further processed in a third country, V. Recommendation c. Bering Leader Fisheries LLC, Lynden, including but not limited to annealing, [FR Doc. 2018–24869 Filed 11–14–18; 8:45 am] WA tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P d. Northern Leader Fisheries LLC, cutting, punching, and/or slitting, or any Lynden, WA other processing that would not otherwise e. Prowler Fisheries, LLC, Seattle, WA remove the merchandise from the scope of DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE the investigations if performed in the country 2. Delete the following companies as Members of the Certificate: of manufacture of the common alloy sheet. International Trade Administration Excluded from the scope of this a. Pathfinder Fisheries LLC, Seattle, WA investigation is aluminum can stock, which [Application No. 10–4A001] b. Bering Select Seafoods Company, is suitable for use in the manufacture of Seattle, WA aluminum beverage cans, lids of such cans, Export Trade Certificate of Review c. Glacier Bay Fisheries LLC or tabs used to open such cans. Aluminum 3. Change/correct the name or can stock is produced to gauges that range ACTION: Notice of issuance of an location of the following Members of the from 0.200 mm to 0.292 mm, and has an H– amended Export Trade Certificate of Certificate: 19, H–41, H–48, or H–391 temper. In Review to Alaska Longline Cod addition, aluminum can stock has a lubricant a. Alaskan Leader Fisheries, Inc., applied to the flat surfaces of the can stock Commission (‘‘ALCC’’), Application No. Lynden, WA changes to Alaskan to facilitate its movement through machines 10–4A001. Leader Fisheries LLC, Lynden, WA used in the manufacture of beverage cans. b. Coastal Villages Longline, LLC SUMMARY: Aluminum can stock is properly classified The Secretary of Commerce, changes to Coastal Villages Longline under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the through the Office of Trade and LLC, Anchorage, AK United States (HTSUS) subheadings Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’), issued an c. Romanzoff Fishing Company, Seattle, 7606.12.3045 and 7606.12.3055. amended Export Trade Certificate of WA changes to Romanzof Fishing Where the nominal and actual Review to ALCC on November 7, 2018. Company, L.L.C., Seattle, WA measurements vary, a product is within the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: d. Tatoosh Seafoods LLC, Seattle, WA scope if application of either the nominal or actual measurement would place it within Joseph Flynn, Director, OTEA, changes to Tatoosh Seafoods, LLC, the scope based on the definitions set for the International Trade Administration, by Edmonds, WA above. telephone at (202) 482–5131 (this is not e. Beauty Bay Washington, LLC, Seattle, Common alloy sheet is currently a toll-free number) or email at etca@ WA changes to Beauty Bay classifiable under HTSUS subheadings trade.gov. Washington, LLC, Edmonds, WA

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Nov 14, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM 15NON1 khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES