FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 32 • NUMBER 100

Wednesday, May 24,1967 • Washington, D.C. Pages 7557-7615

Agencies in this issue— The President Agricultural Research Service Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Civil Aeronautics Board Commodity Credit Corporation Commodity Exchange Authority Consumer and Marketing Service Engineers Corps Federal Aviation Administration Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Reserve System Interstate Commerce Com m ission Labor Department Land Management Bureau National Bureau of Standards National Park Service Securities and Exchange Commission Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Now Available

Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States

HARRY S. TRUMAN, 1952-53

This is the 20th volume in the “Public Papers” series to be released. It completes the set of eight books covering President Truman’s administration. It contains public messages and statements, news conferences, and other selected papers released by the White House during the period January 1, 1952-January 20, 1953. Included in the volume are the President’s two annual messages to Congress on the State of the Union; special messages to Congress on the Mutual Security Program, and on aid for refugees and displaced persons; statements by the President on the termination of the state of war with Japan, and on the need for “Operation Sky watch”; campaign speeches and remarks; the President’s 324th and final news conference; statement by the President giving his reflections on life in the Presidency; and the President’s farewell address to the Amer­ ican people. _

1334 Pages— $9.00

Published by: Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration

Order from: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402

r r n m ■ I W iiW Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or r r l l r n / i l I f l V V t i r l l l k N I r i l on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National 1 mjm Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address National Area Code 202 Phone 962-8626 Onitio * Building, Washington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., Ch. 8B), under regulations prescribed by the Admin-| istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintenaen of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The Federal Register will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15 per year, payable advance. The charge for individual copies varies in proportion to the size of the issue (15 cents for the first 80 pages and 5 cents 1 each additional group of 40 pages, as actually bound). Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Document , U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. .... The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed, to the Code of F ederal Regulations, which is published, under 50 t • P - suant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended. The Code op F ederal R egulations is sold by the Superintendent Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first F ederal Register issue of each month. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R egister or the Code op F ederal R egulation . Contents

COMMODITY EXCHANGE FEDERAL MARITIME THE PRESIDENT AUTHORITY COMMISSION EXECUTIVE ORDER Rules and Regulations Notices Designation of European Space Floor traders, definition; and rec­ Security for the public; financial Research Organization as a pub-___ ords of cash commodity and „responsibility certificates: lie international organization; futures transactions______7593 Chicago, Duluth and Georgian amendment of Executive order 7561 Bay Transit Co. et al.; appli­ Officers of the Marine Corps in the CONSUMER AND MARKETING cations______7603 grade of lieutenant colonel; Hanseatic Schiffahrts - Gesell­ suspension of certain provision SERVICE schaft m.b.H. & Co. and Coun­ of U.S. Code______L.______7563 Rules and Regulations cil on International Educa­ Apricots grown in designated tional Exchange, Inc.; issu­ counties in Washington; ship­ ance------.------7603 EXECUTIVE AGENCIES ments limitation______7582 FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Honey and certain other foods; U.S. standards for grades_____ 7565 Notices SERVICE Milk in Puget Sound marketing Hearings, etc.: Rules and Regulations area; order suspending certain provision ______7583 Community Natural Gas Co., D is e a s e d animals ; Interstate Inc., and Midwestern Gas movement______7583 Proposed Rule Making Transmission Co______7603 Scabies in cattle; revocation of Milk in certain marketing areas! Texaco, Inc., et al______7603 quarantine ______7583 Delaware Valley; suspension of certain provisions______7596 FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION Tampa Bay and Southeastern Florida; emergency decision- 7596 Rules and Regulations AND CONSERVATION SERVICE Loans to executive officers of mem­ Rules and Regulations DEFENSE DEPARTMENT ber banks; exemption of certain Sugar, continental, 1967; require­ See Engineers Corps. indebtedness______7584 ments, quotas, and deficits____ 7581 ENGINEERS CORPS INTERIOR DEPARTMENT AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Rules and Regulations See Land Management Bureau; National Park Service. See Agricultural Research Serv­ Danger zones; San Pablo Bay, ices; Agricultural Stabilization C a lif______-____ 7594 and Conservation Service; Com­ INTERSTATE COMMERCE modity C r e d it Corporation; FEDERAL AVIATION COMMISSION Commodity Exchange Author­ Proposed Rule Making ity; Consumer and Marketing ADMINISTRATION Service. Carrier agreements relating to Rules and Regulations rates, fares, etc.; stay of effec­ ARMY DEPARTMENT Altimeter system requirements; tive date______7600 miscellaneous amendments___ 7585 Notices See Engineers Corps. Control zone and transition area; designation and alteration____ 7589 Motor carrier: CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Enforcement procedures; admin­ Alternate route deviation no­ istrative disposition of viola­ tices ______7605 Rules and Regulations tions ______-______,______7584 Applications and certain other Certificated air carriers; uniform Federal airways; alterations (2 proceedings (2 documents)__ 7606, documents)______7588 7609 system of accounts--______7591 Motor carrier intrastate appli­ Notices Federal airway and jet routes; al­ teration and designation.:____ 7590 cations _____ 7606 Frontier Airlines, Inc.; ladies fare Federal airways and reporting Temporary authority applica­ proposal______7602 points; alteration, designation, tions______7604 and revocation____ 7589 COMMERCE DEPARTMENT Transition areas: LABOR DEPARTMENT See National Bureau of Standards. Alterations (4 documents)____ 7587, Rules and Regulations 7588, 7590 Designations (2 documents)__ 7590 Immigration and American work­ COMMODITY CREDIT ers; certification and noncerti- Proposed Rule Making ficatipn schedules______7594 CORPORATION Airworthiness directives: Rules and Regulations Continental Models 10-470 and LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU Contract Disputes Boards; man­ TSIO-470 engines______7598 Notices ner of filing appeals and hear­ Mooney Model M20C, M20D, and Proposed withdrawal and reser- ings ------7583 M20E airplanes___ - ______7598 vation of lands : Restricted area and continental M ontana______7601 Notices control area; designation and Certain commodities; May sales alteration______7599 Utah (2 documents)______7601 list; amendment______7602 Transition area; alteration______7599 (Continued on next page) 7559 7560 CONTENTS

NATIONAL BUREAU OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE STANDARDS COMMISSION Rules and Regulations Notices Standard rubbers and rubber Hearings, etc.: compounding materials; miscel­ Great American Insurance Co— 7604 laneous amendments______7593 Interamerican Industries, Ltd_ 7604 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Rules and Regulations TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Pishing at Yellowstone National See Federal Aviation Administra­ Park, Wyo______7594 tion.

List of CFR Parts Affected (Codification Guide) The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1967, and specifies how they are affected.

3 CFR 12 CFR 15 CFR Executive Orders: 215______7584 230_____ 7593 11318 (amended by EO 11351)----- 7561 11351 ______'------7561 14 CFR 17 CFR 11352 ______7563 13___"______- ______— 7584 l ______7593 23______7586 7 CFR 25______7587 29 CFR 5 2 ______7565 43_:______7587 60______7594 811______7581 71 (11 documents)______7587-7590 922______7582 75 — ______7590 33 CFR 1125______7583 91______7587 1400___ 7583 241____ .______7591 204...... 7594 P roposed R ules: P roposed R ules: 36 CFR 1004______7596 39 (2 documents) 7598 1012______71 (2 documents) 7599 7------7594 1013______7596 73______7599 49 CFR 9 CFR P roposed R ules: 71______7583 73______7583 103______7600 Presidential Documents

Title 3— THE PRESIDENT Executive Order 11351 AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 11318, DESIGNATING THE EURO­ PEAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION AS A PUBLIC INTERNA­ TIONAL ORGANIZATION By virtue of the authority vested in me by sections 1 and 11 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288), as amended by Public Law 89-353 (80 Stat. 5), Executive Order No. 11318 of December 5, 1966, is amended by adding thereto the following paragraph: “This order shall be effective as of May 31,1966.”

T he W hite H ouse, May 22, 1967. [F.R. Doc. 67-5819 ; Filed, May 22,1967 ; 2: 58 p.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967

THE PRESIDENT 7563

Executive Order 11352 SUSPENDING A PROVISION OF SECTION 5751(b) OF TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE, WHICH RELATES TO OFFICERS OF THE MARINE CORPS IN THE GRADE OF LIEUTENANT COLONEL By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 5785(b) of title 10 of the United jStates Code, I hereby suspend the provision of sec­ tion 5751(b) of title 10 of the United States Code which relates to the service-in-grade requirement for officers of the Marine Corps in the grade of lieutenant colonel for eligibility for consideration by a selec­ tion board for promotion to the next higher grade.

T he W hite H ouse, May 22, 1967. [F.R. Doc. 67-5872; Filed, May 23, 1967; 11:29 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967

7565 Rules and Regulations

Tolerances for Grades (d) The honey shall— Title 7— AGRICULTURE Sec. (1) Be uniform in color throughout the 52.2879 Application of tolerances. comb. Chapter I— Consumer and Marketing 52.2880 Tolerances for comb-section honey. 52.2881 Tolerances for shallow-frame comb (2) Be free from damage caused by Service (Standards, Inspections, honey. granulation, honeydew, poorly ripened Marketing Practices), Department of 52.2882 Tolerances for wrapped cut-comb or sour honey, objectionable flavor or Agriculture honey. odor, or other means. 52.2883 Tolerances for chunk or bulk comb (e) The wood section shall— PART 52— PROCESSED FRUITS AND honey—packed in tin. (1) Be as free from excessive propolis 52.2884 Tolerances for chunk or bulk comb VEGETABLES, PROCESSED PROD­ honey—packed in glass. and/or pronounced stains as illustra­ UCTS THEREOF, AND CERTAIN tion A in the official color chart. Colors, Color Classifications OTHER PROCESSED FOOD PROD­ (2) Be smooth and new in appearance, UCTS 52.2885 Official USDA colors. of white to light buff basswood, and shall 52.2886 Color classifications of comb honey. not contain knots and/or streaks in ex­ Standards for Grades 52.2887 Uniformity of color. cess of the amount shown in illustration Definitions of T erms B in the color chart. In accordance with the provisions of (f) The minimum net weight shall be section 3(a) of the Administrative Pro­ 52.2888 Definitions of terms. 12 ounces, unless otherwise specified. cedure Act (P.L. 89-487, July 4, 1966), the existing U.S. Standards for Grades Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades § 52.2863 U.S. No. 1 comb-section of the products included in this docu­ of Comb Honey 1 honey. ment are hereby codified without sub­ Product D escription U.S. No. 1 honey shall consist of comb- stantive change. section honey that meets the following Compliance with the provisions of the § 52.2861 Product description. requirements: standards set forth in this part shall not The grades in this subpart, as herein­ (a) The comb shall— excuse failure to comply with the pro­ after outlined, are for the following ( 1 ) Have no uncapped cells except— visions of the Federal Food, Drug, and variations of comb honey: (1) In the row attached to the wood Cosmetic Act (or with applicable State Comb-section honey. section, and/or laws and regulations). Shallow-frame comb honey. (ii) In the row adjoining the outside The following subparts are added to Wrapped cut-comb honey. row, in the corners, and along the lower Part 52 : Chunk or bulk comb honey. edge, provided the number does not ex­ ceed 15 in a comb section. Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades of Comb G rades of Comb-S ection Honey Honey (2) Be attached to 50 percent of the adjacent area of the wood section; Product Description § 52.2862 U.S. Fancy comb-section Sec. honey. (3) Not project beyond the edge of the 52.2861 Product description. wood section; U.S. Fancy honey shall consist of (4) Have no dry holes; Grades of Comb-Section Honey comb-section honey that meets the fol­ (5) Have not more than a total of 4 lowing requirements: 52.2862 U.S. Fancy comb-section honey. linear inches of through holes; 52.2863 U.S. No. 1 comb-section honey. (a) The comb shall— (6) Be free from cells of pollen. 52.2864 U.S. No. 1 Mixed Color comb-section (1) Have no uncapped cells except in (b) The cappings shall— honey. the row attached to the wood section; (1) Be dry and free from weeping and 52.2865 U.S. No. 2 comb-section honey. (2) Be attached to 75 percent of the from damage caused by bruising or other 52.2866 Unclassified comb-section honey. adjacent area of the wood section if the means; Grades for Shallow-F rame Comb Honey outside row of cells is empty, or attached (2) Present a uniformly even appear­ to 50 percent if the outside row is filled ance except in the row attached to the 52.2867 U.S. Fancy shallow-frame comb with honey; wood section and except for slight ir­ honey. (3) Not project beyond the edge of the 52.2868 U.S. No. 1 shallow-frame comb regularities affecting not to exceed one- honey. wood section; half of the comb surface. 52.2869 Unclassified shallow-frame comb (4) Not have dry holes; (c) The color of the comb and cap­ honey. (5) Have not more than a total of 2x/2 pings shall conform to the requirements linear inches of through holes; as illustrated for this grade in the official Grades for Wrapped Cut-Comb Honey (6) Be free from cells of pollen. color chart. 52.2870 U.S. Fancy wrapped cut-comb (b) The cappings shall— (d) The honey shall— honey. (1) Be dry and free from weeping and (1) Be fairly uniform in color through­ 52.2871 U.S. No. 1 wrapped cut-comb honey. from damage caused by bruising or other out the comb; 52.2872 Unclassified wrapped cut-comb means. (2) Be free from damage caused by honey. (2) Present a uniformly even appear­ granulation, honeydew, poorly ripened or Grades for Ch u n k or Bulk Comb Honey ance except in the row attached to the sour honey, objectionable flavor or odor, wood section. or other means. 52.2873 U.S. Fancy chunk or bulk comb (c) The color of the comb and cap­ (e) The wood section shall— honey—packed in tin. 52.2874 pings shall conform to the requirements (1) Be as free from excessive propolis U.S. No. 1 -chunk or bulk comb as illustrated for this grade in the offi­ and/or pronounced stains as illustration honey—packed in tin. cial color chart. 52.2875 Unclassified chunk or bulk comb A in the official color chart; honey—packed in tin. (2) Be smooth and new in appearance, 52.2876 U.S. Fancy chunk or bulk comb 1 This is a reissue (with slight modifications of white to light buff basswood, and shall honey—packed in glass. in wording, arrangement, and format) of the not contain knots and/or streaks in ex­ 52.2877 U.S. No. 1 chunk or bulk comb U.S. Standards for Grades of Comb Honey, cess of the amount shown in illustration honey—packed in glass. 52.2878 Circular No. 24, as revised, of the U.S. Depart­ B in the color chart. Unclassified chunk or bulk comb ment of Agriculture. That circular, revised (f) The minimum net weight shall be honey—packed in glass. Aug. 1933, is out of print. 11 ounces, unless otherwise specified.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 No. loo-----a 7566 RULES AND REGULATIONS

§ 52.2864 U.S. No. 1 Mixed Color comb- (1) Be produced in shallow frame (d) The honey shall— section honey. spaced 1% inches from center to center, (1) Be fairly uniform in color which will give a comb thickness of not throughout the comb; When sections of U.S. No. 1 comb-sec­ less than 1 inch, unless otherwise (2) Be free from damage caused by tion honey of different colors are packed specified; granulation, honeydew, poorly ripened or in the same container, they shall be des­ (2) Be drawn out on foundation which sour honey, objectionable flavor or odor, ignated as U.S. No. 1 Mixed Color comb- is light in color and is thin enough to or other means. section honey. produce a comb that compares favorably § 52.2869 Unclassified shallow-frame §52.2865 U.S. No. '2 comb-section in texture with the comb in comb-section comb honey. honey. honey; U.S. No. 2 honey shall consist of comb- (3) Be well built out; Unclassified shallow-frame co m b section honey that meets the following (4) Never have contained brood; honey shall consist of shallow-frame requirements: (5) Have no dry holes; comb honey that does not conform to (a) The comb shall— (6) Have no uncapped cells, except as the requirements for either of the. fore­ (1) Have no uncapped cells except— follows— going grades. (i) Empty cells in the row attached to (1) In the row attached to the wood G rades for W rapped Cut-C omb H oney section, and/or the frame, and/or (ii) In the row adjoining the outside (ii) 150 uncapped cells filled with § 52.2870 U.S. Fancy wrapped cut-comb row, in the comers, and along the lower well-ripened honey in the adjoining row; honey. (7) Be free from cells of pollen. edge; provided the number does not ex­ U.S. Fancy honey shall consist of ceed 30 in a comb section; (b) The cappings shall— (1) Not be broken or damaged by wrapped cut-comb honey that meets the (iii) Elsewhere in the body of the following requirements: comb, not more than 5; of the total num­ other means; ber of uncapped cells exclusive of those (2) Present a uniformly even appear­ (a) The comb shall— ance. (1) Be drawn out on foundation that in the outside row, not more than 20 may is light in color and is thin enough to be empty; (c) The color of the comb and cap­ (2) Be attached to 50 percent of the pings shall conform to the requirements produce a comb that compares favorably adjacent area of the wood section; as illustrated for U.S. Fancy comb- in texture with the comb in comb-section section honey in the official color chart. honey; (3) Not project beyond the edge of the (2) Have no uncapped cells except on wood section; (d) The honey shall— (4) Have no dry holes larger than (1) Be uniform in color throughout the cut edges; three-eighths inch across if more than the combs of the lot, unless otherwise (3) Never have contained brood; 1% inches from the wood section; specified; (4) Have no dry holes; (5) Have not more than a total of 6 (2) Be free from damage caused by (5) Be free from cells of pollen. linear inches of through holes; granulation, honeydew, poorly ripened or (b) The cappings shall— (6) Be free from serious damage sour honey, objectionable flavor or odor, (1) Be free from weeping and from caused by cells of pollen. or other means. damage caused by bruising or other means; (b) The cappings shall— § 52.2868 U.S. No. 1 shallow-frame comb (2) Present a uniformly even appear­ (1) Not be badly bruised, marred, or honey. leaking (small holes cut in cappings or ance. small broken surfaces permitted); U.S. No. 1 honey shall consist of (c) The color of the comb and cap­ (2) Have no requirements as to uni­ shallow-frame comb honey that meets pings shall conform to the requirements formly even appearance. the following requirements: as illustrated for U.S. Fancy comb-sec­ (c) The color of the comb and cap­ (a) The comb shall— tion honey in the official color chart. pings shall conform to the requirements (1) Be produced in shallow frames (d) The honey shall— as illustrated for this grade in the of­ spaced 1% inches from center to center, (1) Be uniform in color throughout ficial color chart. which will give a comb thickness of not the comb; (d) The honey shall— less than 1 inch, unless otherwise (2) Be free from damage caused by (1) Have no requirements as to uni­ specified; granulation, honeydew, poorly ripened or formity in color in any of the comb (2) Be drawn out on foundation which sour honey, objectionable flavor or odor, sections; is light in color and is thin enough to or other means. (2) Be free from serious damage produce a comb that compares favorably (e) The wrapper shall be transparent, caused by granulation, honeydew, poorly in texture with the comb in comb-section clean, and sealed in such a manner as to ripened or sour honey, objectionable honey; prevent leakage. flavor or odor, or other means. (3) Never have contained brood; (f) The minimum net weight shall be (e) The wood section shall— (4) Have no uncapped cells, except as 12 ounces, unless otherwise specified. (1) Be as free from excessive propolis follows— § 52.2871 U.S. No. 1 wrapped cut-comb and/or pronounced stains as illustration (i) Empty cells in the row attached to honey. A in the official color chart; the frame and in the adjoining row, (2) Be new in appearance, unless and/or U.S. No. 1 honey shall consist of otherwise specified. (ii) Additional uncapped filled cells, wraped cut-comb honey that meets the (f) The minimum net weight shall be provided they are confined to groups and following requirements: 10 ounces, unless otherwise specified. in the aggregate do not cover over 10 (a) The comb shall— percent of the comb surface in any (1) Be drawn out on foundation that § 52.2866 Unclassified comb-section frame; is light in color and is thin enough to honey. (5) Be free from damage caused by produce a comb that compares favorably Unclassified comb-section honey shall cells of pollen. in texture with the comb in comb-section consist of comb-section honey that does (b) The cappings shall— honey; not conform to the requirements for any (1) Be free from serious damage (2) Have no uncapped cells, except as of the foregoing grades. caused by being broken or by other follows— means; (i) On the cut edges, and/or G rades for Shallow-F rame Comb H oney (2) Present a uniformly even appear­ (ii) In the row adjoining the cut edge, § 52.2867 U.S. Fancy shallow-frame ance except for slight irregularities af­ provided the number does not exceed 15 comb honey. fecting not to exceed one-half of the in a cut comb; comb surface. (3) Never have contained brood; U.S. Fancy honey shall consist of (c) The color of the comb and cap­ shallow-frame comb honey that meets pings shall conform to the requirements (4) Have no dry holes; the following requirements: as illustrated for U.S. No. 1 comb-section (5) Be free from cells of pollen. (a) The comb shall— honey in the official color chart. (b) The cappings shall—

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7567

(1) Be free from weeping and from § 52.2874 U.S. No. 1 chunk or bulk comb § 52.2878 Unclassified chunk or bulk damage caused by bruising or other honey—packed in tin. comb honey— packed in glass. means; (2) Present a uniformly even appear­ U.S. No. 1 chunk or bulk comb honey “Unclassified” chunk or bulk comb ance except for slight irregularities af­ packed in tin shall consist of not less honey packed in glass shall consist of fecting not to exceed one-half of the than 50 percent by volume of chunk or chunk or bulk comb honey that does not comb surface. bulk comb honey, unless otherwise spec­ conform to the requirements of any of ified, which meets the following require­ the foregoing grades. (c) The color of the comb and cappings ments: shall conform to the requirements as T olerances for Grades illustrated for U.S. No. 1 comb-section (a) The comb shall— honey in the official color chart. (1) Be drawn out on foundation that § 52.2879 Application of tolerances. (d) The honey shall— is light in color and is thin enough to produce a comb that compares favor­ The tolerances specified for the vari­ (1) Be fairly uniform in color through­ ous grades are placed on a container ba­ out the comb; ably in texture with the comb in comb- section honey; sis. However, any lot of honey shall be (2) Be free from damage caused by considered as meeting the requirements granulation, honeydew, poorly ripened (2) Have not more than two uncapped cells per square inch of comb surface; of a specified grade if no sample from or sour honey, objectionable flavor or the containers in any lot is found to ex­ odor, or other means. (3) Never have 'contained brood; (4) Have no dry holest ceed the tolerances specified by more (e) The wrapper shall be transparent, than double the amount allowed, pro­ clean, and sealed in such a manner as to (5) Be free from cells of pollen. prevent leakage. (b) The cappings shall— vided the entire lot shall average within (1) Be free from damage caused by the tolerance specified. (f) The minimum net weight shair be bruising or other means; 11 ounces, unless otherwise specified. § 52.2880 Tolerances for comb-section (2) Present a uniformly even appear­ honey. § 52.2872 Unclassified wrapped cut- ance except for slight irregularities af­ comb honey. fecting not to exceed one-half of the (a) U.S. Fancy, U.S. No. 1, and U.S. Unclassified wrapped cut-comb honey comb surface. No. 1 Mixed Color. (1) In order to allow shall consist of cut-comb honey which (c) The color of the comb and cap­ for variations, other than in weight, in­ does not conform to the requirements pings shall conform to the requirements cident to proper grading and handling, for either of the foregoing grades. as illustrated for U.S. No. 1 comb-section not more than 5 percent, by count, of the comb sections in any container may be Grades for Chunk or B ulk Comb H oney honey in the official color chart, except that any amount of watery cappings below the requirements for the grade, but § 52.2873 U.S. Fancy chunk or bulk shall be permitted. not to exceed two-fifths of this tolerance, comb honey— packed in tin. (d) The honey shall— or 2 percent of the comb sections in any container, shall be allowed for defects U.S. Fancy chunk or bulk comb honey (1) Be fairly uniform in c o lo r throughout the comb and the color of causing serious damage. packed in tin shall consist of not less (2) In addition to the foregoing tol­ than 50 percent by volume of chunk or the honey in the comb shall not be darker than the next darker color clas­ erance, not more than 5 percent, by bulk comb honey, unless otherwise spec­ count, of the comb sections in any con­ ified, which meets the following require­ sification of the extracted honey used to make up the total weight; tainer may fail to meet the weight re­ ments: quirements. (a) The comb shall—" (2) Be free from damage caused by (b) U.S. No. 2. (1) In order to allow (1) Be drawn out on foundation that granulation, honeydew, poorly ripened or for variations, other than in weight, in­ is light in color and is thin enough to sour honey, objectionable flavor or odor, cident to proper grading and handling, produce a comb that compares favorably or other means. not more than 5 percent, by count, of in texture with the comb in comb-section (e) The total weight shall be made the comb sections in any container may honey; up with U.S. Fancy extracted honey. be below the requirements for the grade. (2) Have not more than one uncapped (f) The color of the honey within the (2) In addition to the foregoing tol­ cell per square inch of comb surface; container shall be designated according erance, not more than 5 percent, by (3) Never have contained brood; to the color of the extracted honey used count, of the comb sections in any con­ (4) Have no dry holes; to make up the total weight. tainer may fail to meet the weight (5) Be free from cells of pollen. requirements. (b) The cappings shall— § 52.2875 Unclassified chunk or bulk (1) Be free from damage caused by comb honey— packed in tin. § 52.2881 Tolerances for shallow-frame bruising or other means; “Unclassified” chunk or bulk comb comb honey. (2) Present a uniformly even appear­ honey packed in tin shall consist of ance. (a) U.S. Fancy and U.S. No. 1. (1) In chunk or bulk comb honey that does not order to allow for variations, other than (c) The color of the comb and cap­ conform to the requirements of any of in weight, incident to proper grading pings shall conform to the requirements the foregoing grades. as illustrated for U.S. Fancy comb-sec­ and handling, not more than 5 percent, tion honey in the official color chart, § 52.2876 U.S. Fancy chunk or bulk by count, of the frames of honey in any except that any amount of watery cap­ comb honey— packed in glass. container may be below the requirements pings shall be permitted. for the grade, but not to exceed two-fifths “U.S. Fancy” chunk or bulk comb of this number, or 2 percent of the frames (d) The honey shall— honey packed in glass shall consist of d) Be uniform in color throughout in any container, shall be allowed for the comb and the color of the honey in chunk or bulk comb honey that conforms defects causing serious damage. the comb shall not be darker than the to the requirements for this grade when (2) In addition to the foregoing tol­ erance, a variation of not more than 5 next darker color classification of the packed in tin, except that no given vol­ percent below the net weight marked on extracted honey used to make up the ume of chunk or bulk comb honey is re­ the cases shall be permitted. total weight. quired. (2) Be free from damage caused by § 52.2882 Tolerances for wrapped cut- granulation, honeydew, poorly ripened or § 52.2877 U.S. No. 1 chunk or bulk comb comb honey. honey— packed in glass. sour honey, objectionable flavor or odor, (a) U.S. Fancy and U.S. No. 1. (1) In or other means. “U.S. No. 1” chunk or bulk comb honey ^ Ttm total weight shall be made order to allow for variations, other than up with U.S. Fancy extracted honey. packed in glass shall consist of chunk or in weight, incident to proper grading and (f) The color of the honey within the bulk comb honey that conforms to the handling, not more than 5 percent, by requirements for this grade when packed count, of the wrapped cut combs in any ontainer shall be designated according container may be below the requirements o the color of the extracted honey used in tin, except that no given volume of for the grade, but not to exceed two-fifths c make up the total weight. chunk or bulk comb honey is required. of this tolerance, or 2 percent of the

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7568 RULES AND REGULATIONS wrapped cut combs in any container, § 52.2887 Uniformity of color. (h) “Weeping” is the exudation or seepage of honey through the cappings, shall be allowed for defects causing (a) “Uniform in color” means that no serious damage. pronounced variation in color Is apparent forming small drops which finally run (2) In addition to the foregoing tol­ down the face of the combi. It is usually in the honey on looking through a comb caused by absorption of moisture from erance, not more than 5 percent, by toward the light. count, of the wrapped cut combs in any the atmosphere by the honey. (b) “Fairly uniform in color” means (i) “Bruising” is any injury by ac­ container may fail to meet the weight that honey of a slightly different color requirements. cident or pressure, such as an indenta­ from that in the body of the comb section tion of the surface of the comb by pres­ § 52.2883 Tolerances for chunk or bulk is permitted in the row next to the sec­ sure of fingers. Bruising is considered to comb honey— packed in tin. tion and in 10 additional cells, provided be damage if it is sufficient to cause these additional cells are well distributed (a) U.S. Fancy and U.S. No. 1. In or­and are in the row adjoining the outside leaking. der to allow for variations incident to (j) “Uniformly even appearance” row. In no event shall the contrast of means that the surface of the combs proper grading and handling, not more color be greater than that between any than 5 percent, by count, of the con­ color classification and the darker color shall be free from irregularities other tainers in any lot may have honey below classification. than those incident to the work of the the requirements for the grade. bees in completing a comb of uniform D efinitions of T erms construction. § 52.2884 Tolerances for chunk or bulk (k) “Slight irregularities” means ir­ comb honey— packed in glass. § 52.2888 Definitions of terms. regularities of not more than one-eighth (a) U.S. Fancy and U.S. No. 1. In or­ (a) “Damage” means any injury or inch above or below the general surface der to allow for variations incident to defect that materially affects the appear­ of the comb, but not projecting beyond proper grading and handling, not more ance, edibility, or shipping quality of the the edge of the section. The slight ridg­ than 5 percent, by count, of the con­ honey, such as: ing of comb surface sometimes incidental tainers in any lot may have honey below (1) The presence of any cells, of pol­ to the use of fence separators is not to the requirements for the grade. len in more than one-third of the combs be considered an irregularity. in any lot of U.S. No. 1 shallow-frame Colors, Color Classifications (l) “Freedom from excessive propolis comb honey. One-third of the combs and/or pronounced stains” means that § 52.2885 Official USDA colors. may have not more than 50 cells of pollen the top of the wood section shall bear (a) Official color chart. The official in a comb, provided they are not widely no greater stain from propolis than that color chart mentioned throughout this scattered but are on the outside edges ordinarily found on a paraffined section, subpart is out of print and no longer of the comb. and that the other three sides and the available. (2) The presence in comb-section edges and inner faces and angles of the (b) USDA glass color standards. These honey, shallow-frame comb honey, wood sections shall be reasonably free color standards replace the “official color wrapped cut-comb honey, or chunk or from propolis. Permissible stain is shown chart” which is out of print. Information bulk comb honey packed in tin or glass, in the color chart.3 regarding the USDA glass color stand­ of more than 10 percent by volume of (m) “New in appearance” means not ards, and their availability, may be ob­ granulated honey in the uncapped cells, discolored by age or exposure. Paraffined tained from: or of more than very small or scattered sections usually appear new, even though granules in the capped cells. Processed Products Standardization and In­ they may be left over from a previous spection Branch, Fruit and Vegetable (3) The presence of any spots of season. Division, Consumer and Marketing Serv­ feces (bee excrement) on the comb. (n) “Well built out,” as used in ref­ ice, US. Department of Agriculture, (b) “Serious damage” means any in­ erence to shallow-frame comb honey, Washington, D.C. 20250. jury or defect that seriously affects the means that the combs are fairly uniform edibility or shipping quality of the honey. in thickness throughout each comb and § 52.2886 Color classifications of comb Any spots of feces on the surface of the throughout the lot. honey. comb or, in sections, attachment of comb (a) Comb-section honey, shallow- Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades of Bulk to less than 45 percent of the adjacent Sauerkraut frame comb honey, and wrapped cut- area shall be considered serious damage. comb honey shall be classified as white, (c) “Uncapped cells” or cells, either Product Description, Grades light amber, amber, or dark amber. Sec. empty or filled with honey, which are not 52.3451 Product description. (b) The foregoing color classification sealed or capped over by the bees. shall be determined in accordance with 52.3452 Grades of bulk sauerkraut. (d) “Adjacent area of the section” F actors of Quality the color standards as outlined in the means the total length of the four inner applicable U.S. Standards for Grades of sides of the section, multiplied by the 52.3453 Ascertaining the grade. Extracted Honey, but the color shall be 52.3454 Ascertaining the rating of each designated as follows: thickness of the comb; as, for instance, factor., (1) Honey classed as water white, ex­ in the case of a section 4 inches square, 52.3455 Color. tra white, and white for extracted honey 4+ 4+ 4+ 4 equals 16, which, multiplied 52.3456 Cut. by the actual thickness of the comb, 52.3457 Absence of defects. „ shall be designated white comb honey; which might be 1% inches, gives an ad­ 52.3458 Texture. (2) Honey classed as extra light amber 52.3459 Flavor. and light amber shall be designated light jacent area of 20 square inches. amber comb honey; (e) “Project beyond the edge of the Methods of Analysis (3) Honey classed as amber shall be section” refers to the projection of (»mb 52.3460 Determination of acidity. beyond the widest part of the section* designated amber comb honey; Lot Compliance (4) Honey that is darker than amber generally because no separators were shall be designated dark amber comb used, and does not refer to the occasional 52.3461 Ascertaining the grade of a lot. honey. slight projection of wax beyond the nar­ Score Sheet row or beeway part of the section. Pro­ (c) In classifying the color of comb 52.3462 Score sheet for bulk sauerkraut. honey, a sample of liquid honey shall be jection at this point to such an extent drained from a broken comb and the that honey leaks down over the face of Subpart— U.S. Standards fpr Grades determination made according to the the comb is not permitted. of Bulk Sauerkraut color standards for extracted honey as (f) “Dry holes” are holes in the honey­ outlined in the applicable U.S. Standards comb larger than a cell, and not next P roduct Description, Grades for Grades of Extracted Honey. to the wood; they may extend partly or § 52.3451 Product description. (d) It is permissible to state the color entirely through the comb. of the honey contained in the comb in (g) “Through holes” are holes or pas­ Bulk or barreled sauerkraut, herein­ conformity with the colors established sages through the comb from one side after referred to as “sauerkraut” or “bulk for the classification of the color of of the comb to the other, between the extracted honey. edge of the comb and the section. 3 See § 52.2885.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7569 sauerkraut” is the product of character­ § 52.3455 Color. (b) (A) classification. Sauerkraut that istic acid flavor, obtained by the full fer­ (a) (A) classification. Sauerkraut that is firm and crisp may be given a credit of mentation, chiefly lactic, of properly possesses a color approximating, or is 13 to 15 points. prepared and shredded cabbage in the lighter than “Olive Buff” (according to (c) (C) classification. If the product is presence of not less than 2 percent nor Ridgway’s “Color Standards and Nomen­ somewhat tough, or is slightly soft, a more than 3 percent of salt. It contains, clature”), may be given a credit of 13 credit of 10 to 12 points may be allowed. upon completion of the fermentation, not to 15 points. Sauerkraut that falls in this classifica­ less than 1.5 percent of acid, expressed tion shall not be graded above U.S. Grade as lactic acid. (b) (C) classification. If the sauer­ kraut possesses a color ranging from C (Second Quality), regardless of the § 52.3452 Gradies o f bulk sauerkraut. “Olive Buff” to (but not darker than) total score for the product. “Dark Olive Buff”, or is slightly greenish (d) (D) classification. If the sauer­ (a) “U.S. Grade A (First Quality)” kraut is tough, or contrariwise, is soft bulk sauerkraut is of a color approximat­ or yellowish, or possesses a tint of light brown, a credit of 10 to 12 points may be and mushy, a credit within the range of ing, or is lighter than “Olive Buff” (ac­ zero to nine points may be allowed. cording to Ridgway’s “Color Standards allowed. Sauerkraut that falls in this and Nomenclature”), with the shreds classification shall not be graded above § 52.3459 Flavor. uniformly cut to approximately %2-inch U.S. Grade C (Second Quality), regard­ (a) (A) classification. Sauerkraut that in thickness. The product is practically less of the total score for the product. has a highly acid (expressed as lactic), free from defects and blemishes; is of (c) (D) classification. If the sauer­ palatable, clean, characteristic sauer­ fine, crisp texture; possesses a normal, kraut possesses a decidedly dark, or pink kraut flavor, may be given a credit of well developed, sauerkraut flavor; and tinted color, a credit within the range of 40 to 45 points. scores not less than 85 points when zero to nine points may be allowed. (b) (C) classification. If the product scored according to the scoring system § 52.3456 Cut. possesses a good sauerkraut flavor that outlined herein. may be suggestive of improper bacterial (b) “U.S. Grade C (Second Quality)” (a) (A) classification. If the shreds of action, but not markedly so, it may be bulk sauerkraut may have a variable sauerkraut are uniformly cut to approxi­ given a credit of 34 to 39 points. Sauer­ straw color, but not darker than “Dark mately %2-inch in thickness and are of kraut that falls in this classification Olive Buff” (according to Ridgway’s a reasonable length, a credit of 13 to 15 shall not be graded above U.S. Grade C “Color Standards and Nomenclature”) ; points may be allowed. (Second Quality), regardless of the total the shreds may lack uniformity of thick­ (b) (C) classification. If the cut is very score for the product. ness. The product is reasonably free irregular, the shreds being “choppy” and (c) (Z>) classification. If the flavor is from defects and blemishes; is of reason­ poorly cut, a credit of 10 to 12 points may poor and unpalatable from any cause ably fine, crisp texture; possesses a nor­ may be allowed. Sauerkraut that falls in (acetic, butyric, yeasty, moldy, very mal sauerkraut flavor; and scores not this classification may not be graded salty, bitter stale, or rancid), a credit less than 70 points and need not score above U.S. Grade C (Second Quality), within the range of zero to 33 points may more than 84 points when scored ac­ regardless of the total score for the be allowed. cording to the scoring system outlined product. Methods of Analysis herein. (c) (D) classification. Sauerkraut that (c) “Substandard” bulk sauerkraut is is very uneven in cut, containing de­ § 52.3460 Determination of acidity. sauerkraut that fails to meet the require­ cidedly thick or short shreds, may be The method of titration used to de­ ments of the foregoing grades or when given a credit of not more than nine termine the degree of lactic acidity in any one of the grading factors falls in the points. sauerkraut is as follows: Place 10 cc. of (D) classification. sauerkraut juice in a flask, add 40 cc. of § 52.3457 Absence o f defects. distilled water (hydrant water contains F actors of Quality (a) General. The factor of absence of large quantities of alkaline salts which § 52.3453 Ascertaining the grade. defects refers to defects such as large tend to neutralize the sauerkraut acid before titration takes place). Shake the The grade of bulk sauerkraut may be pieces of leaves, dead leaves, large pieces of core, spotted shreds, or other defects. flask to mix thoroughly the sauerkraut ascertained by considering, in addition juice and water. Add three or four drops to the requirements in the definition, the (b) (A) classification. Sauerkraut that of phenolphthalein solution. Into this following factors: Color, cut, absence of is practically free from the defects men­ mixture slowly run, drop by drop, from a defects, texture, and flavor. The relative tioned may be given a credit of nine to 10 points. burette graduated in %o cc. and filled importance of each element has been ex­ with % normal solution of sodium hy­ pressed numerically on a scale of 100. (c) (C) classification. If the product is droxide, enough of the sodium hydroxide The maximum number of credits that reasonably free from the defects men­ to bring a permanent pink tint to the may be given for each factor is: tioned, a credit of six to eight points may sauerkraut juice solution, shaking the Points be allowed. Sauerkraut that falls in this flask as the sodium hydroxide is added. Color______1 5 classification shall not be graded above As soon as the pink tint becomes perma­ cut ...... I.""”!””""”"! is U.S. Grade C (Second Quality), regard­ nent (at first it will fade away), note the Absence of defects______10 less of the total score for the product. amount of the hydroxide used, divide this Texture ______1 5 Flavor ______45 (d) (D) classification. If pieces of dead number by 10, and the result is a number leaves, large pieces of core, spotted which is the percentage of lactic acid Total score______100 shreds, or any similar blemishes are in the sauerkraut juice. prominently present to the extent of in­ Lot Compliance § 52.3454 Ascertaining the rating of each juring the appearance of the product, a factor. credit within the range of zero to five § 52.3461 Ascertaining the grade of a points may be allowed. lot. The essential variations within each The grade of a lot of bulk sauerkraut factor are so described that the value § 52.3458 Texture. covered by these standards is determined may be ascertained for each factor and (a) General. The factor of texture re­by the procedures set forth in the Regu­ expressed numerically. The numerical fers to the condition of the product and lations Governing Inspection and Certi­ ranges within each factor are inclusive. the tendency of the shreds to be firm, fication of Processed Fruits and Vege­ tables, Processed Products Thereof, and For instance, the range 13 to 15 means fresh, crisp, and easy to cut, as contra­ 13,14, and 15. Certain Other Processed Food Products distinguished to soft or mushy. (§§ 52.1 to 52.87).

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7570 RULES AND REGULATIONS

S core S heet the addition of a seasoning ingredient, (4) Sirup that tests less than 18° Brix and are sufficiently processed by heat to is considered “Water pack.” § 52.3462 Score sheet for bulk sauer­ kraut. assure preservation of the product in § 52.5605 Recommended fill bf con­ hermetically sealed containers. tainer. § 52.5602 Types and varieties of canned The container shall be filled with dried dried prunes. prunes as full as practicable without im­ (a) “Sweet types” include such vari­ pairment of quality. The product and Maxi- Points eties as French, Imperials, Sugar, and packing medium occupies not less than Factors mum allowable Robe de Sergeant varieties. 90 percent of the total volume capacity score (b) “Tart type” includes the Italian of the container. variety. §52.5606 Recommended minimum [(A) 13-15 Color______15 {(C) »10-12 § 52.5603 Grades of canned dried drained weights. 1(D) 2 0-9 prunes. 1(A) 13-15 (a) Drained weights of canned dried Cut...... - 15 {(C) »10-12 prunes are determined by emptying the 1(D) 2 0-9 (a) “U.S. Grade A” or “U.S. Fancy” (A) 9-10 canned dried prunes are dried primes contents of the container upon a circu­ Absence of defects... 10 {(C) »6-8 of similar varietal characteristics which lar sieve of proper diameter, containing 1(D) 2 0-5 1(A) 13-15 possess a normal flavor and are of such eight meshes to the inch (0.097-inch Texture______- 15 {(C) »10-12 quality with respect to color, uniformity perforations) and allowing to drain for 2 1(D) 2 0-9 minutes. A sieve 8 inches in diameter is |(A) 40-45 of size, absence of defects, and character Flavor______35 {(C) »34-39 of fruit as to score not less than 90 points used for No. 2 y2 size containers and 1(D) 2 0-33 when scored in accordance with the scor­ smaller, and a sieve 12 inches in diam­ Total Score___ 100 ing system outlined herein. eter is used for containers larger than (b) “U.S. Grade B” or “U.S. Choice” No. 2 ^ size. canned dried prunes are dried prunes (b) The recommended minimum of similar varietal characteristics which drained weights in the containers com­ 1 Sauerkraut that falls In this classification may not be monly used in packing canned dried graded above U.S. Grade G (Second Quality). possess a reasonably uniform typical 2 Sauerkraut that falls in this classificatiomnay not be color; are reasonably free from defects; prunes are shown in the following table: graded above Substandard. possess a reasonably good, tender, fleshy Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades of Canned texture; possess a normal flavor; and Recommended drained weight Dried Prunes are of such quality with respect to uni­ formity of size as to score not less than Container size Metal containers Class con­ Product Description, T ypes and Varieties, or name tainers Grades 75 points when scored in accordance with the scoring system outlined herein. Sec. (c) “U.S. Grade C” or “U.S. Standard” Regular Heavy Regular 52.5601 Product description. pack pack pack 52.5602 Types and varieties of canned dried canned dried prunes are dried prunes prunes. which possess a fairly uniform, fairly 52.5603 Grades of canned dried prunes. good typical color; are fairly free from No. 1 Tall . defects; possess a fairly good texture; No. 2 Liquid Media, F ill op Container, Drained No. 2H-...... 18 oz. Weights, Counts possess a normal flavor; and are of such quality with respect to uniformity of No. 10 52.5604 Sirup density. size as to score not less than 60 points 52.5605 Recommended fill of container. when scored in accordance with the scor­ (c) Canned dried prunes that meet 52.5606 Recommended minimum drained the recommended drained weight re­ weights. ing system outlined herein. 52.5607 Count of prunes. (d) “U.S. Grade D” or “Substandard” quirements for “Heavy Pack” will be cer­ canned dried prunes are dried prunes tified as “Heavy Pack” in addition to Factors op Quality that are wholesome and edible but fail the grade statement. 52.5608 Ascertaining the grade. to meet the requirements of U.S. Grade (d) When certifying samples which 52.5609 Ascertaining the rating of each fac­ C or U.S. Standard. have been officially drawn from lots of tor. canned dried prunes, compliance of the 52.5610 Color. Liquid Media, F ill of Container, entire sample with recommended mini­ 52.5611 Uniformity of size. D rained Weights, Counts 52.5612 Absence of defects. mum drained weights will be determined 52.5613 Character of fruit. § 52.5604 Sirup density. by averaging the drained weights of all containers in the sample, provided the Explanation op Terms (a) Canned dried prunes are usually packed in sirup, or other packing me­ range bf variability is within the limits 52.5614 Explanation of terms. dium. Sirup “cut-out” requirements, of good packing practice. If the average Lot -Compliance however, are not incorporated in the thus obtained is not less than the rec­ ommended drained weight, shown in the 52.5615 Ascertaining the grade of a lot. grades of the finished product as sirup, as such, is not a factor of quality for the foregoing table, the samples will be cer­ Score Sheet purpose of these grades. tified without exception. 52.5616 Score sheet for canned dried prunes. (b) Canned dried prunes will be certi­ (e) Except^ as provided above, con­ fied as to grade without regard to sirup tainers of dried prunes that fall below Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades density, but in each instance Federal in­ the recommended minimum drained of Canned Dried Prunes spection certificates will indicate the weight will be certified with the addi­ P roduct D escription, T ypes and density of the sirup found upon exami­ tional statement: “Below recommended minimum drained weight.” Varieties, Grades nation. When samples are officially drawn, the designation of sirjup will be § 52.5607 Count of prunes. §52.5601 Product description. based upon the average sirup density of Canned dried prunes are the whole, all containers examined, provided the Federal inspection certificates will in­ ripe fruit of the plum tree CPrunus range of variability is within the limits of dicate the count of prunes found upon domestica) from which the greater por­ good packing practice. For this purpose— examination. tion of moisture was removed and which (1) “Extra heavy sirup” means that F actors of Quality are subsequently processed, usually by the sirup tests 30° or more Brix. § 52.5608 Ascertaining the grade. rehydration in boiling water or steam; (2) “Heavy sirup” means that the by packing with or without the addition The grade of canned dried prunes may of sirup, sugar, or a liquid medium; with sirup tests 24° to 30° Brix. be ascertained by considering, in addi­ or without the addition of a slight (3) “Light sirup” means that the sirup tion to the foregoing requirements, the amount of edible acid; with or without tests 18° to 24° Brix. following factors: Color, uniformity of

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7571 size, absence of defects, and character points. “Practically' uniform in size” (a) (1), (2), (3), and (4) of this section. of fruit. The relative importance of each means that the weight of the largest One prune that is defective is permitted factor has been expressed numerically prune may not exceed the weight of the if it exceeds 5 percent by count. on a scale of 100. The maximum number smallest prune by more than 75 percent. (c) (B) Classification. If the canned of points that may be given for each (b) (B) Classification. If the canned dried prunes are reasonably free from factor is: dried primes are reasonably uniform in defects, a score of 22 to 26 points may be Points size, a score of 12 or 13 points may be given. “Reasonably free from defects” Color — ------20 given. “Reasonably uniform in size” means that there may be present, not Uniformity of size..------15 Absence of defects------30 means that the weight of ihe largest more than 10 percent by count of prunes Character of fruit------35 prune may not be more than twice the affected by any defect or any combina­ weight of the smallest prune. tion of defects mentioned in paragraph Total score______100 (c) (C) Classification. Canned dried (a) (1), (2), (3), and (4) of this section. prunes that vary in size may be given One prune that is defective is permitted § 52.5609 Ascertaining the rating of a score of 10 or 11 points. if it exceeds 10 percent by count. each factor. § 52.5612 Absence of defects. (d) (C) Classification. If the canned The essential variations within each dried prunes are fairly free from defects, factor are so described that the value (a) Definitions of defects. The factor a score of 17 to 21 points may be given. may be ascertained for each factor and of absence of defects refers to the degree Canned dried prunes that fall into this expressed numerically. The numerical of freedom from the following: classification shall not be graded above ranges within each factor are inclusive. (1) Prunes tl^at possess growth cracks,U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard, regard­ For example, the range 18 to 20 means splits, breaks in the skin, or skin damage less of the total score for the product. 18, 19, and 20. of the following descriptions: “Fairly free from defects” means that (1) Calloused growth cracks aggre­ there may be present not more than 15 § 52.5610 Color. gating more than % inch in length. percent by count of prunes affected by (a) (A) Classification. Canned dried (ii) Splits or breaks not having cal­ any defect or combination of defects primes that possess a practically uni­ loused edges when the flesh is mashed mentioned in paragraph (a) (1), (2), form, typical color may be given a score out beyond the protecting skin so as to (3), and (4) of this section. of 18 to 20 points. “Practically uniform, affect materially the normal appearance (e) “(D) Classification. Canned dried typical color” means that the color of of the prunes. prunes that fail to meet the requirements the skins of the prunes is typical and (iii) Any cracks, splits, or breaks open of paragraph (d) of this section, may be may be black, blue black, or reddish to the pit. given a score of 0 to 16 points and shall brown; and that not more than 5 per­ (iv) Skin damage caused by over­ not be graded above U.S. Grade D or cent by count of the prunes may possess dripping, rain processing, or other causes Substandard, regardless of the total score a dull chocolate brown surface color or which materially affects the appearance for the product. may possess abnormal darkening of the of the prunes. § 52.5613 Character of fruit. flesh due to caramelization or fermenta­ (2) Prunes that possess areas of scab tion. of the following descriptions: (a) (A) Classification. Canned dried (b) (B) Classification. If the canned (i) Tough or thick scab exceeding in prunes that possess a good, fender, fleshy dried prunes possess a reasonably uni­ the aggregate the area of a circle % inch texture may be given a score of 31 to 35 form, typical color, a score of 15 to 17 in diameter. points. “Good tender, fleshy texture” points may be given. “Reasonably uni­ (ii) Scab of other character exceeding means that the prunes are thick-fleshed; form, typical color” means that the color in the aggregate the area of a circle % that not more than 5 percent by count of of the skins of the prunes is typical and inch in diameter. prunes have fibrous or tough skins; and may be black, blue black, or reddish (3) Prunes that 'are so affected by that not more than 10 percent by count brown; and that not more than 10 per­ burning or scorching in the sun, or in of prunes may be soft or hard in texture. cent by count of the prunes may possess dehydration, as to damage materially One prune that possesses a tough skin, a dull chocolate brown surface color or the skin or flesh. is soft, or is hard, is permitted, if one may possess abnormal darkening of the (4) Prunes that are damaged by insect prune exceeds 5 percent or 10 percent by flesh due to caramelization or fermenta­ injury or other similar defects. count. tion. (5) “Tough or thick scab” means (b) (B) Classification. If canned dried (c) (C) Classification. If the canned thick leathery areas on the skin fre­ prunes possess a reasonably good, tender, dried prunes possess a fairly uniform, quently formed as the result of thrip in­ fleshy texture, a score of 26 to 30 points fairly good typical color, a score of 12 jury, mildew, leaf chafing, limb rubs, or may be given. “Reasonably good, tender, to 14 points may be given. Canned dried other means. Such scab is to be distin­ fleshy texture” means that the prunes prunes that fall into this classification guished from “scab or other character” are reasonably thick-fleshed; that not shall not be graded above U.S. Grade C which is more or less inconsequential more than 10 percent by count of prunes or U.S. Standard, regardless of the total and practically blends in color with the may have fibrous or tough skins; and score for the product. “Fairly uniform, skin on the portion of the prune not that not more than 15 percent by count fairly good typical color” means that the affected. of prunes may be soft or hard in texture. skins of the prunes may vary in shades of (6) “Damaged by insect injury” means (c) (C) Classification. If the canned typical colors and that not more than 15 healed or unhealed surface blemishes, dried prunes possess a fairly good texture, percent by count of the prunes may pos­ and healed or unhealed blemishes in the a score of 21 to 25 points may be given. sess a dull chocolate brown surface color flesh which materially affect the appear­ Canned dried prunes that fall into this or may possess abnormal darkening of ance, edibility, or keeping quality of the classification shall not be graded above the flesh due to caramelization or fer­ fruit but which do not possess evidence U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard, regard­ mentation. of insect infestation. less of the total score for the product. (d) (£>) Classification. Canned dried (7) “Damaged by other similar de­ “Fairly good texture” means that the primes that are definitely off color for fects” means any injury or defect or prunes may vary in thickness and texture any reason or that otherwise fail to meet group of defects not mentioned herein of flesh or may possess fibrous or tough requirements of paragraph (c) of this which materially affect the appearance, skins; and that not more than 20 percent section may be given a score of zero to 11 edibility or keeping quality of the fruit. by count of prunes may be soft or hard Points and shall not be graded above U.S. (b) (A) Classification. Canned dried in texture. Grade D or Substandard, regardless of prunes that are practically free frdin de­ (d) (D) Classification. Canned dried the total score for the product. fects may be given a score of 27 to 30 prunes that fail to meet the requirements § 52.5611 Uniformity of size. points. “Practically free from defects” of paragraph (c) of this section may be means that there may be present not given a score of zero to 20 points and (a) (A) Classification. Canned driedmore than 5 percent by count of prunes shall not be graded above U.S. Grade D prunes that are practically uniform in affected by any defect or any combina­ or Substandard, regardless of the total size may be given a score of 14 or 15 tion of defects mentioned in paragraph score for the product.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL, 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7572 RULES AND REGULATIONS

E xplanation of T erms See. possess pale yellow areas around the 52.5771 U.S. Grade D (Slabs) or Substand­ stem and that do not exceed an area § 52.5614 Explanation of terms. ard (Slabs). equivalent to one-eighth of the outer (a) “24° Brix” means that the packing Explanation of T erms v surface side of the unit; not more than medium surrounding the fruit tests 24 52.5772 Explanation of terms. 5 percent by weight of the fruit may be degrees when tested with a Brix spindle, of a color described in U.S. Grade B or or hydrometer, or with a refractometer, Work Sheet U.S. Choice, but none of the fruit may be read at the proper temperature for the 52.5773 Work sheet and summary of re­ of a color described in UJS. Grade C or instrument used. quirements for. dried apricots. U.S. Standard. (b) “Normal canned dried prune (b) Not more than a total tolerance flavor” means that the product is free Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades of 10 percent by weight may be slabs, im­ from objectionable odors or objectionable of Dried Apricots mature, or may possess pits or pieces of flavors of any kind. P roduct D escription, Moisture, S izes pits; may be damaged by discoloration, Lot Compliance sunburn, hail marks, scab, disease, insect § 52.5761 Product description. injury, or other similar defects; or may § 52.5615 Ascertaining the grade of a Dried apricots are the halved and be affected by mold, decay, insect infes­ lot. pitted fruit of the apricot tree (Prunus tation (no live insects are permitted), The grade of a lot of canned dried armeniaca) from which the greater por­ imbedded dirt, or other foreign material: primes covered by these standards is tion of moisture has been removed. Be­ Provided, That, not more than two-fifths determined by the procedures set forth fore packing, the dried fruit is processed of the total tolerance, or 4 percent by in the Regulations Governing Inspection to cleanse the fruit and may be sulfured weight, may be affected by mold, decay, and Certification of Processed Fruits and sufficiently to retain a characteristic insect infestation (no live insects are Vegetables, Processed Products Thereof, color. permitted), imbedded dirt, or other for­ and Certain Other Processed Food Prod­ § 52.5762 Moisture. eign material: And further provided, ucts (§§ 52.1 through 52.87). That, not more than one-tenth of the Federal inspection certificates shall in­ S core Sheet total tolerance, or 1 percent by weight, dicate the moisture content of the fin­ may be affected by decay. § 52.5616 Score sheet for canned dried ished product which shall be not more prunes. than 26 percent by weight for sizes No. § 52.5765 U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice. 1, No. 2, and No. 3, and for slabs, and not (a) U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice dried Number, size, kind of container more than 25 percent by weight for other apricots possess similar varietal charac­ Can mark______— sizes. Label— . ______teristics; and possess a reasonably uni­ Net weight (in ounces)------§ 52.5763 Sizes. form, bright typical color, characteris­ Vacuum reading (in inches)----- Drained weight (in ounces)----- (a) Federal inspection certificates tic of reasonably well-matured apricots. Sirup (Degrees Brix)------The fruit may possess pale yellow areas Type...... shall indicate the size or combination of Count______sizes of halved apricots found upon ex­ around the stem end that do not exceed amination; or shall indicate “Slabs” if an area equivalent to one-fourth of the Factors Score points the apricots are such, or “Whole Pitted” outer surface side of the unit; not more (or “Slip Pitted”, (if the apricots are than 10 percent by weight of the fruit (A) 18-20 found to be of this style. may be of a color described in U.S. Grade (B) 15-17 (b) The various sizes of dried apricots, C or U.S. Standard, but none of the units Color. 20 (C) * 12-14 may possess light green areas that exceed (D) * 0-11 except for slabs (including “whole pitted” i(A) 14-15 or “slip pitted” aprieots) are as follows: an area equivalent to one-fourth of the Uniformity of size______15 ((B) 12-13 outer surface side of the unit. 1(C) 10-11 No. 1 Size (Jumbo Size) _ 1% inches, or (b) Not more than a total tolerance f(A) 27-30 inches in di­ J(B) 22-26 of 15 percent by weight may be slabs, im­ Absence pf defects______30 1(C) *17-21 ameter. 1(D) * 0-16 No. 2 Size (Extra Fancy 1% inches to 1% mature, or may possess pits or pieces of ((A) 31-35 Size). inches in di­ pits, may be damaged by discoloration, J(B) 26-30 ameter. sunburn, hail marks, scab, disease, insect Character of fruit. 35 1(C) *21-25 1(D) * 0-20 No. 3 Size (Fancy Size)_ iya inches to 1*4 injury, or other similar defects; or may inches in di­ be affected by mold, decay, insect infes­ Total score. 100 ameter. tation (no live insects are permitted), No. 4 Size (Extra Choice 1 inch to 1*4 imbedded dirt, or other foreign material: Grade. Size). Inches in di­ Flavor. ameter. Provided, That, not more than one-third No. 5 Size (Choice Size) _ i%6 inch to 1 inch of the total tolerance, or 5 percent by * Indicates limiting rules within classification. in diameter. weight, may be affected by mold, decay, No. 6 Size (Standard Less than i%e insect infestation (no live insects are per­ Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades of Dried Size). inch in diam­ mitted) , imbedded dirt, or other foreign Apricots eter. material: And further provided, That, P roduct Description, Moisture, Sizes (1) “Diameter” means the shortest not more than one-fifteenth of the total Sec. measurement across the face of the apri­ tolerance, or 1 percent by weight, may be 52.5761 Product description. cot half when restored to its normal affected by decay. 52.5762 Moisture. shape. § 52.5766 U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard. 52.5763 Sizes. (2) In determining compliance with Grades of Dried Apricots size requirements of this section, dried (a) U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard apricots will be considered as of one size dried apricots possess similar varietal (Other Than Slab Grades) if not more than 10 percent by weight characteristics; and possess a fairly uni­ 52.5764 XJ.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy. of the fruit varies from the size range. form typical color, characteristic of fairly 52.5765 U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice. well-matured apricots. The fruit may be 52.5766 U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard. G rades of D ried Apricots pale yellow in color and may possess 52.5767 U.S. Grade D or Substandard. (Other T han S lab Grades) light green areas around the stem end of Grades of Dried Apricots (Slabs) the fruit that do not exceed an area § 52.5764 U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy. equivalent to one-quarter of the outer 52.5768 U.S. Grade A (Slabs) or US. Fancy (a) U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy dried surface side of the unit, but not more (Slabs). than 15 percent by weight of the total 52.5769 U.S. Grade B (Slabs) or U.S. Choice apricots possess similar varietal charac­ (Slabs). teristics; and possess a practically uni­ fruit may possess light green areas that 52.5770 U.S. Grade C (Slabs) or U.S. Stand­ form, bright typical color, characteristic exceed an area equivalent to one-quarter ard (Slabs). of well-matured apricots. The fruit may of the outer surface side of the unit.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7573

(b) Not more than a total tolerance of Explanation of T erms the fruit but which do not possess evi­ 20 percent by weight of the fruit may be dence of insect infestation. slabs, immature, or possess pits or pieces § 52.5772 Explanation of terms. (6) “Affected by insect infestation” of pits; may be damaged by discolora­ (a) Damage or other defects. (1) means that the dried apricots show the tion, sunburn, hail marks, scab, disease, “Damaged by discoloration” means that insect injury, or other similar defects; presence of insects, insect fragments, or the apricots have become excessively excreta. No live insects are permitted. or may be affected by mold, decay, in­ darkened. Darkening of otherwise sound sect infestation (no live insects are per­ (7) “Affected by imbedded dirt” mitted) , imbedded dirt, or other foreign fruit characteristic of fruit held in stor­ means the units have sufficient quanti­ material: Provided, That, not more than age, in keeping with good commercial ties of adhering dirt to give the fruit a one-fourth of the total tolerance, or 5 practice, shall not be considered as dam­ dirty, smudgy appearance and dirt which percent by weight, may be affected by aged by discoloration unless excessively mold, decay, insect infestation (no live may not be removed readily in washing darkened. the fruit. insects are permitted), imbedded dirt, (2) “Damaged by sunburn” means any or other foreign material: And further (b) Maturity. (1) “Well-matured” provided, That, not more than one-tenth substantial damage to color or texture of means that the apricots are fully ripe. of the total tolerance, or 2 percent by skin caused by excessive heat from the (2) “Reasonably well-matured” means weight, may be affected by decay. sun. that the apricots are firm and may not § 52.5767 U.S. Grade D or Substandard. (3) “Damaged by hail marks, scab, or have reached the fully ripe stage. disease” means' that the combined area U.S. Grade D or Substandard dried (3) “Fairly well-matured” means that apricots are wholesome and edible fruit of all such defects, or of any one such de­ the apricots may be hard but not imma­ that fails to meet the requirements of fect, exceeds in the aggregate an area ture. U.S. Gradé C or U.S. Standard: Provided, equivalent to the area of a circle three- (4) “Immature” means that the apri­ That, not more than 20 percent by weight eighths inch in diameter. cots are tough or possess a green or of the total fruit may be slabs; and not (4) “Damaged by other similar de­ other color indicative of immature fruit. more than 5 percent by weight of the fects” means any injury or defect or total fruit may be affected by mold, de­ (c) Slabs. “Slabs” are apricots that cay, insect infestation (no live insects group of defects not mentioned herein have been mashed, broken, or mutilated are permitted), imbedded dirt, or other which materially affect the appearance, to the extent that they have lost their foreign material: And further provided, edibility, or keeping quality of the fruit. normal contour and have become defi­ That, not more than 2 percent by weight (5) “Damaged by insect injury” means nitely flattened at the edge or rim. A half of the total fruit may be affected by healed or unhealed surface blemishes, decay. that has a slightly tom edge is not con­ and healed or unhealed blemishes in sidered a slab. For the purpose of these Grades of D ried Apricots (S labs) the flesh which materially affect the ap­ grades “whole pitted” (or “slip pitted”) § 52.5768 Ü.S. Grade A (Slabs) or U.S. pearance, edibility, or keeping quality of dried apricots are considered as slabs. Fancy (Slabs). W ork S heet U.S. Grade A (Slabs) or U.S. Fancy (Slabs) dried apricots meet the require­ § 52.5773 Work sheet and summary o f requirements for dried apricots. ments of U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy, except that there is no limit to the per­ Size of case or package. centage of slabs. Markings___...______Label or brand___ § 52.5769 U.S. Grade B (Slabs) or U.S. Net weight..______Size or sizes__... _____ Choice (Slabs). Moisture content_____ U.S. Grade B (Slabs) or U.S. Choice (Slabs) dried apricots meet the require­ A B C D ments of U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice, Slabs Slabs Slabs Slabs except that there is no limit to the per­ centage of slabs. C olor Minimum requirements § 52.5770 U.S. Grade C (Slabs) or U.S. Grade A c

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 No. 100----- 3 7574. RULES AND REGULATIONS

Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades (b) Not more than a total tolerancetotal tolerance, or 2 percent by weight, of Dried Peaches of 10 percent by weight may be slabs, may be affected by decay. immature, or may possess pits or pieces of § 52.5808 U.S. Grade D or Substandard. P roduct D escription, Moisture, T ypes pits; may be damaged by discoloration, and Varieties, S izes sunburn, hail marks, scab, disease, in­ U.S. Grade D or Substandard dried peaches are wholesome and edible fruit § 52.5801 Product description. sect injury, or other similar defects; or may be affected by mold, decay, insect that fails to meet the requirements of Dried peaches are the halved and pit­ infestation (no live insects are per­ U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard: Provided, ted fruit of the peach tree (Prunus per­ mitted) , imbedded dirt, or other foreign That, not more than 5 percent by weight sica) from which the greater portion of material: Provided, That, not more than of the total fruit may be affected by mold, moisture has been removed. Before pack­ three-tenths of the total tolerance, or decay, insect infestation (no live insects ing, the dried fruit is processed to cleanse 3 percent by weight, may possess pits or are permitted), imbedded dirt, or other the fruit and may be sulfured sufficiently pieces of pits; not more than two-fifths foreign material: And further provided, to retain a characteristic color. of the total tolerance, or 4 percent by That, not more than 2 percent by weight of the total fruit may be affected by § 52.5802 Moisture. weight, may be affected by mold, decay, insect infestation (no live insects are decay. Federal inspection certificates shall in­ permitted), imbedded dirt, or other Explanation of Terms dicate the moisture content of the fin­ foreign material: And further provided, ished product which shall be not more That, not more than one-tenth of the § 52.5809 Explanation of terms. than 25 percent by weight. total tolerance, or 1 percent by weight, (a) Damage or other defects. (1) may be affected by decay. “Damaged by discoloration” means that § 52.5803 Types and varieties of dried the peaches have become excessively peaches. § 52.5806 U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice. darkened. Darkening of otherwise sound (a) Freestone. (1) Muir variety. (a) U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice dried fruit characteristic of fruit held in stor­ (2) Lovell variety. peaches possess similar varietal charac­ age, in keeping with good commercial (3) Elberta variety. teristics; and possess a reasonably uni­ practice, shall not be considered as dam­ (4) Other freestone varieties or mixed form, bright typical color, characteristic aged by discoloration unless excessively freestone varieties. of reasonably well-matured peaches. Not darkened. (b) Clingstone. (1) Midsummer vari­ more than 10 percent by weight of the (2) “Damaged by sunburn” means any ety. / fruit may be of a color described in U.S. substantial damage to color or texture (2) Phillips variety. Grade C or U.S. Standard. of skin caused by excessive heat from the (b) Not more than a total tolerance of sun. § 52.5804 Sizes of dried peaches. 15 percent by weight may be slabs, im­ (3) “Damaged by hail marks, scab, or (a) Federal inspection certificatesmature, or may possess pits or pièces of disease” means that the combined area shall indicate the size or combination of pits; may be damaged by discoloration, of all such defects, or of any one such sizes of halved peaches found upon exam­ sunburn, hail marks, scab, disease, insect defect exceeds in the aggregate an area ination. injury, or other similar defects; or may equivalent to the area of a circle three- (b) The various sizes of dried peachesbe affected by mold, decay, insect infes-, eighths inch in diameter. are as follows: tation (no live insects are permitted), (4) “Damaged by other similar de­ imbedded dirt, or other foreign material: fects” means any injury or defect or No. 1 Size (Jumbo Size) _ 2 inches or larger Provided, That, not more than one-third group of defects not mentioned herein in diameter. of the total tolerance, or 5 percent by which materially affect the appearance, No. 2 Size (Extra Fancy 1% inches to 2 weight, may possess pits or pieces of edibility, or keeping quality of the fruit. Size). inches in diam­ (5) “Damaged by insect injury” eter. pits; not more than one-third of the- No. 3 Size (Fancy Size)- iy2 inches to 1% total tolerance, or 5 percent by weight, means healed or unhealed surface blem­ inches in diam­ may be affected by mold, decay, insect ishes, and healed or unhealed blemishes eter. infestation (no live insects are permit­ in the flesh which materially affect the No. 4 Size (Extra Choice 1% inches to iy2 ted), imbedded dirt, or other foreign appearance, edibility, or keeping quality Size). inches in diam­ material: And further provided, That, of the fruit but which do not possess eter. not more than one-fifteenth of the total evidence of insect infestation. No. 5 Size (Choice Size) _ 1 y8 inches to 1% (6) “Affected by insect infestation” inches in diam­ tolerance, or 1 percent by weight, may eter. be affected by decay. means that the dried peaches show the No. 6 Size (Standard Less th an 1 yB presence of insects, insect fragments, or Size). inches in diam­ § 52.58Q7 U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard. excreta. No live insects are permitted. eter. (7) “Affected by imbedded dirt” means (a) U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard the units have sufficient quantities of (1) “Diameter” means the shortest dried peaches possess similar varietal adhering dirt to give the fruit a dirty, measurement across the face of the characteristics; and possess a fairly uni­ smudgy appearance and dirt which may peach half when restored to its normal form typical color, characteristic of fairly well-matured peaches. not be removed readily in washing the shape. fruit. (2) In determining compliance with (b) Not more than a total tolerance (b) Maturity. (1) “Well-matured” size requirements listed above, dried of 20 percent by weight of the fruit may means that the peaches are fully ripe. peaches will be considered as of one size be slabs, immature, or possess pits or (2) “Reasonably well-matured” means if not more than 10 percent by weight of pieces of pits; may be damaged by dis­ that the peaches are firm and may not halves vary from the size range. coloration, sunburn, hail marks, scab, disease, insect injury, or other similar have reached the fully ripe stage. G rades of D ried P eaches defects; or may be affected by mold, (3) “Fairly well-matured” means that the peaches may be hard but not imma­ § 52.5805 U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy. decay, insect infestation (no live insects are permitted), imbedded dirt, or other ture. (a) U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy driedforeign material: Provided, That, not (4) “Immature” means that the peaches possess similar varietal char­ more than one-half of the total tolerance, peaches are tough or possess green or acteristics; and possess a practically or 10 percent by weight, may possess pits other color indicative of immature fruit. uniform, bright typical color, character­ or pieces of pits; not more than one- (c) Slabs. “Slabs” are peaches that istic of well-matured peaches. Not more fourth of the total tolerance, or 5 percent have been mashed, broken, or mutilated than 5 percent by weight of the fruit by weight, may be affected by mold, de­ to the extent that they have lost their may be of a color described in U.S. Grade cay, insect infestation (no live insects normal contour and have become def­ B or U.S. Choice, and none of the fruit are permitted), imbedded dirt, or other initely flattened at the edge or rim. A may be of a color described in U.S. Grade foreign material: And further provided, half that has a slightly torn edge is not C or U.S. Standard. That, not more than one-tenth of the considered a slab.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7575

W ork S heet ease, Insect injury, or other similar de­ fects; or may be affected by mold, decay, § 52.5810 Work sheet and summary of requirements for dried peaches. insect infestation (no live insects are permitted), imbedded dirt, or other for­ Size of case or package. eign material: Provided, That, not more Markings...... —------Label or brand------than two-fifths of the total tolerance, or Net weight. 4 percent by weight, may be affected by Size or sizes_____ Moisture content. mold, decay, insect infestation (no live insects are permitted), imbedded dirt, or other foreign material: And further provided, That, not more than one-tenth Minimum requirements of the total tolerance, or 1 percent by COLOB weight, may be affected by decay. Grade A color. 95% Grade B color. 5% 90% § 52.5845 U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice. 10% 100% ----- Grade C color. (a) U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice dried Maximum tolerances D efects pears possess similar varietal charac­ Total defects.-..---- ______- —•______10% 15% 20% teristics; possess a reasonably uniform, Slabs, and immature; damaged by discoloration, sunburn, hail marks, scab, bright typical color, characteristic of disease, insect injury, or other similar defects; and------10% 15% 20% But not more than reasonably well-matured pears; and are Fruit processing pits or pieces of pits; an d....----- .------—------3%| 5%| 10%|------But not more than reasonably well shaped.. Not more than Affected by mold, decay, Insect infestation, imbedded dirt, or other foreign 10 percent by weight of the fruit may be material ,______——------—— 4%| 5%| 5%l 5% of a color described in U.S. Grade C or But not more than 1%| 1%| 2%| 2% U.S. Standard. Decay. (b) Not more than a total tolerance of 15 percent by weight may be slabs, Grade. immature, or scraps; may be affected by russet or similar discoloration; may be Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades of Dried (b) The various sizes of dried pears damaged by discoloration, sunburn, hail- Pears are as follows: marks, limb-rubs, hard end, black end, Product Description, Moisture, Sizes No. 1 Size (Jumbo Size) _ 1 % inches or external stems and calyx cups, scabs, more in width. Sec. disease, insect injury, or other similar No. 2 Size (Extra Large 1% inches to defects; or may be affected by mold, de­ 52.5841 Product description. Size). 1 % inches in 52.5842 Moisture. width. cay, insect infestation (no live insects 52.5843 Sizes of dried pears. No. 3 Size (Large Size) — iy2 inches to are permitted), imbedded dirt, or other Grades for Dried P ears 1% inches in foreign material: Provided, That, not width. more than one-third of the total toler­ 52.5844 U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy. No. 4 Size (Medium Size) _ 1% inches to ance, or 5 percent by weight, may be 52.5845 U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice. 1 y2 inches in 52.5846 U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard. affected by mold, decay, insect infesta­ width. tion (no live insects are permitted), 52.5847 U.S. Grade D or Substandard. No. 5 Size (Small Size)_ 1 y8 inches to Explanation of T erms 1% inches in imbedded dirt, or other foreign material: width. And further provided, That, not more 52.5848 Explanation of terms. No. 6 Size (Extra SmaU Less than 1% than one-fifteenth of the total tolerance Work S heet Size). in ch es in or 1 percent by weight, may be affected width. 52.5849 Work sheet and summary of re­ by decay. quirements for dried pears. (1) “Width” means the longest meas­ § 52.5846 U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard. urement obtainable, measured at right Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades angles to a line running from the stem (a) U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard of Dried Pears dried pears possess similar varietal char­ end to the calyx end. acteristics; possess a fairly uniform Product D escription, Moisture, Sizes (2) In determining compliance with size requirements listed above, dried pears color; characteristic of fairly well-ma­ § 52.5841 Product description. tured pears; and are fairly well shaped. will be considered as of one size if not (b) Not more than a total tolerance Dried pears are the halved fruit of the more than 10 percent by weight of halves vary from the size range. of 20 percent by weight may be slabs, pear tree (Pyrus communis) which may immature, or scraps; may be affected by or may not be cored, from which the ex­ Grades for D ried F ears russet or similar discoloration, may be ternal stems and calyx cups have been damaged by discoloration, sunburn, hail- removed, and from which the greater § 52.5844 U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy. marks, limb-rubs, hard end, black end, portion of the moisture has been re­ (a) U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy dried external stems and calyx cups, scab, moved. Before packing, the dried fruit is pears possess similar varietal character­ disease, insect infestation (no live in­ processed to cleanse the fruit and may istics; possess a practically uniform, sects are permitted), imbedded dirt, or be sulfured sufficiently to retain a char­ bright typical color characteristic of other foreign material; Provided, That, acteristic color. well-matured pears; and are well shaped. not more than one-fourth of the total § 52.5842 Moisture. Not more than 5 percent by weight of tolerance, or 5 percent by weight may be the fruit may be of a color described in affected by mold, decay, Insect infesta­ Federal inspection certificates shall U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice: and none tion (no live insects are permitted), im­ indicate thç moisture content of the fin­ of the fruit may be of a color described bedded dirt, or other foreign material: ished product which shall be not more in U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard. And further provided, That, not more than 26 percent by weight. (b) Not more than a total tolerance than one-tenth of the total tolerance, or § 52.5843 Sizes of dried pears. of 10 percent by weight may be slabs, 2 percent by weight, may be affected by immature, or scraps; may be affected by decay. (a) Federal inspection certificates russet or similar discoloration; may be shall indicate the size or combination of damaged by discoloration, sunburn, hall­ § 52.5847 U.S. Grade D or Substandard. sizes of halved pears found upon exami­ marks, limb-rubs, hard end, black end, U.S. Grade D or Substandard dried nation. external stems and calyx cups, scab, dis­ pears are wholesome and edible fruit

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7576 RULES AND REGULATIONS that fails to meet the requirements of presence of insects, insect fragments, or (2) “Reasonably well shaped” means U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard: Pro­ excreta. No live insects are permitted. that the pears have been cut longitudi­ vided, That, not more than 5 percent by (7) “Affected by im bedded dirt” nally into approximate equal halves, and weight of the total fruit may be affected means the units have sufficient quanti­ that the halves may tend to be oval in by mold, decay, insect infestation (no ties of adhering dirt to give the fruit a shape but are not so irregular as to be live insects are permitted), imbedded dirty, smudgy appearance and dirt which misshapen. dirt, or other foreign material: And fur­ may not be removed readily in washing (3) “Fairly well shaped” means that ther provided, That, not more than 2 the fruit. the pears have been cut longitudinally percent by weight of the total fruit may (c) Maturity. ( 1 ) “Well-matured” into approximately equal halves, and be affected by decay. means that the pears are fully ripe. that any portion of a half is not less (2) “Reasonably well-matured” means than two-thirds of the apparent original Explanation of T erms that the pears are firm and may not half. § 52.5848 Explanation of terms. have reached the fully ripe stage. (e) Slabs. “Slabs” are pears that have (3) “Fairly well-matured” means that been mashed or mutilated to the extent (a) Color. (1) “Practically uniform, the pears may be hard but not immature. that they have lost their normal con­ bright typical color” means that the (4) “Immature” means that the pears tour and have become definitely flat­ halves are bright and translucent, and possess a grayish white or dead white tened at the edge or rim. A half that has not darker than pear yellow in color. color indicative of immature fruit. a slightly torn edge is not considered a (2) “Reasonably uniform, bright typi­ (d) Shape. (1) “Well-shaped” means cal color” means that the halves are rea­ that the pears have been cut longitudi­ slab. sonably bright and reasonably translu­ nally into approximately equal halves, (f) Scraps. “Scraps” means any por­ cent, and not darker than pear yellow and that the halves are practically whole tion of a half that is less than two-thirds in color. and symmetrical. of the apparent original half. (3) “Fairly uniform typical color” means that the halves are fairly bright W ork S heet and fairly translucent and are of any § 52.5849 Work sheet and summary of requirements for dried pears. normal color not darker than dark amber. Size of case or package. (b) Damage or other defects. (1) “Af­ Markings...... fected by russet or similar discoloration” Label or brand____ ... Net weight____ ...... means reddish brown discoloration Size or sizes______caused by sunlight when the area so af­ Moisture content_____ fected is conspicuous. Russet or other similar skin discoloration is not consid­ ered “damaged by discoloration.” (2) “D a m a g e by discoloration” Minimum requirements means— Grade A color______;...... ______95% Grade B color...... 5% 90% (i) Skin discoloration caused by sun­ Grade C color...... 10% 100% burn, limb-rubs, hailmarks, or other D efects Maximum tolerance means which when light brown in color, Total defects...... 10% 15% 20% exceed in the aggregate one-eighth of the Slabs, immature, or scraps; affected by russet or similar discoloration; dam­ aged by discoloration; sunburn, hailmarks, limb-rub, hard Snd, black end, surface and which, when dark brown or external stems, calyx cups, scab, disease, insect injury, or other similar 10% 15% 20% darker, or hard, tough and leathery, ex­ defects; and ceed in the aggregate an area equivalent But not more than Affected by mold, decay, insect infestation, imbedded dirt, or other foreign to one-sixteenth of the outer surface side material. 4% | 6% | 5% | 5% of the unit. But not more than (ii) Flesh discoloration caused by Decay. 1% I 1% I 2% I 2% bruising, drought spot, or other means which are materially darker or lighter Grade. than the normal color of the half and which exceed in the aggregate an area Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades of Frozen Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades equivalent to one-sixteenth of the outer Berries of Frozen Berries surface side of the unit. P roduct Description, T ypes P roduct D escription, T ypes (iii) Darkening of otherwise sound Sec. fruit characteristic of fruit held in stor­ 52.5881 Product description. § 52.5881 Product description. age, in keeping with good commercial 52.5882 Types of frozen berries. Frozen berries are prepared from the practice, shall not be considered as dam­ Grades of F rozen Berries aged by discoloration unless excessively properly ripened fresh fruit of the plant 52.5883 Grades of frozen berries. (Genus Rubus); are stemmed and darkened. cleaned; may be packed with or without (3) “Damaged by hard end or black Grades of Frozen Berries for end” means the light colored areas at Manufacturing -packing media; and are frozen and stored at temperatures necessary for the the calyx end of the fruit or similar dam­ 52.5884 Grades of frozen berries for manu­ age which exceed in the aggregate an facturing. preservation of the product. area equivalent to one-eighth of the § 52.5882 Types of frozen berries. outer surface. T ypes of P ack 52.5885 Types of pack. (a) Blackberries. (4) “Damaged by other similar de­ (b) Boysenberries. fects” means any injury or defect or F actors of Quality group of defects not mentioned herein (c) Dewberries. 52.5886 Ascertaining the grade. (d) Loganberries. which materially affect the appearance, 52.5887 Ascertaining the rating of each (e) Youngberries. edibility, or keeping quality of the fruit. factor. (f) Other similar types, such as (5) “Damaged by insect injury” means 52.5888 Color. “Nectarberries.” healed or unhealed surface blemishes, 52.5889 Absence of defects. and healed or unhealed blemishes in the 52.5890 Character. G rades of F rozen Berries flesh which materially affect the appear­ § 52.5883 Grades o f frozen berries. ance, edibility, or keeping quality of the Lot Compliance fruit but which do not possess evidence 52.5891 Ascertaining the grade of a lot. (a) U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy frozen berries are berries of similar varietal of insect infestation. Score Sheet (6) “Affected by insect infestation” characteristics which possess a practi­ means that the dried pears show the 52.5892 Score sheet for frozen berries. cally uniform typical color; are prac-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7577 tically free from defects; possess a good time of packing, 1 pound of sugar was and shall not be graded above U.S. Grade character; possess a normal flavor and added to 6 pounds of berries. D or Substandard, regardless of the total odor; and score not less than 85 points (b) It is recommended that the quan­score for the product. when scored In accordance with the scor­ tity of liquid packing medium, if used, (d) The evaluation of the score points ing system outlined herein. is not in excess of the amount normally for the factor of color may be determined (b) U.S. Grade B or U.S. Choice frozenrequired by good commercial practice. from the following table which denotes berries are berries of similar varietal the variation in color allowed for the characteristics which possess a reason­ F acto rs o f Q u a l it y score indicated: ably uniform typical color; are reason­ § 52.5886 Ascertaining the grade. ably free from defects; possess a reason-* (a) The grade of frozen berries is de­ Marked Marked ably good character; possess a normal variation variation Definitely termined immediately after thawing to from color from color ofi color flavor and odor; and score not less than the extent that the units may be sepa­ of well- of reason­ for any 70 points when scored in accordance with Classi­ Score ripened ably well- reason rated easily. fication points berries ripened the scoring system outlined herein. (b) “Normal flavor and odor” means berries

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7578 RULES AND REGULATIONS more than 10 percent by weight of ber­ given. Frozen berries that fall into this berries, boysenberries, loganberries, ries may be undeveloped or damaged. classification shall not be graded above youngberries, or other similar types may (e) (D) classification: Frozen berries U.S. Grade B or UJ3. Choice, regardless be crushed. —■ that fail to meet the requirements of of the total score for the product. (d) (D) classification: Frozen berries paragraph (d) of this section may be “Reasonably good character” means that that fail to meet the requirements of given a score of zero to 27 points and the berries are reasonably mature and paragraph (c) of this section may be shall not be graded above U.S. Grade D may be not more than slightly immature given a score of zero to 20 points and or Substandard, regardless of the total nor slightly overmature; that the berries shall not be graded above U.S. Grade score for the product. may be not more than slightly lacking D or Substandard, regardless of the total (f) The evaluation of the score for the in fleshy texture; that the berries and score for the product. factor of absence of defects may be deter­ any accompanying liquor are reasonably (e) The evaluation of the score for mined from the following table which free from detached seed cells; and that character may be determined from the denotes the maximum allowance for not more than 15-percent by weight of following table which denotes the maxi­ each type of defect for the score blackberries may be crushed and not mum allowances for berries that are indicated: more than 20 percent by weight of dew­ crushed.

Harmless extraneous Cnisbed material Undevel­ oped or damaged Classi­ Score Dewberries, Sepal-like Leaves, berries fication points Maturity and texture Detached seed cells Boysenberries, bracts stems, full Blackberries Loganberries, Classifi­ Score caps Youngberries, cation points and other similar types Maximum Maximum (by weight) Per 16 Per 48 ounces net ounces net (by count) weight weight 30 Ripe but not over-ripe; fleshy Berries and accompany- 1% 2% 29 and tender. ing liquor-practically 2% 4% A 28 free. 3% 6% 40 0 None 0% 27 4% 8% 39 1 None 1% 26 6% 10% 38 1 1 2% A 37 1 1 3% 36 2 1 3% 26 Not more than slightly imma- Berries and accompany- 7% 12% 36 2 1 4% 24 ture nor slightly overmature; ing liquor-reasonably 9% 14% 34 2 1 5% B 23 not more than slightly lacking free. 11% 16% 22 in fleshy texture. 13% 18% 21 15% 20% Per 16 ounces net weight D 20 or More than allowances permitted in B Classification. less 33 3 None 6% 32 3 1 6% B 31 4 1 7% Lot Compliance 30 4 1 8% 29 6 1 9% § 52.5891 Ascertaining the grade of a lot. 28 6 1 10% / The grade of a lot of frozen berries covered by these standards is determined by 27 More than allowances permitted in B the procedures set forth in the Regulations Governing Inspection and Certification D or Classification of Processed Fruits and Vegetables, Processed Products Thereof, and Certain Other less Processed Food Products (§ § 52.1 through 52.87). S core S heet Subpart—-U.S. Standards for Grades of Maple § 52.5890 Character. § 52.5892 Score sheet for frozen berries. Sirup for Reprocessing (a) General: The factor of character P roduct Description refers to the maturity, texture, and ap­ No. size and kind of container______Sec. pearance, as well as to the degree of dis­ Label: Style of pack: Fruit-sugar ratio (If shown) 52.5921 Product description. integration of the berries. A berry is con­ Grades sidered “crushed” if more than 50 per­ Container or Container mark or sample 52.5922 U.S. Grade AA (Fancy). cent of the drupelets are crushed, broken, identification or detached, or if the normal shape of 52.5923 U.S. Grade A. the berry is otherwise materially af­ Cases 52.5924 U.S. Grade B. fected or destroyed. 52.5925 U.S. Grade C. (b) (A) classification: To receive a Net weight ('ounces') - __ 52.5926 Unclassified. score of 26 to 30 points the frozen berries must possess a good character. “Good Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades character” means that the berries are Factors Score points of Maple Sirup for Reprocessing mature and ripe but not overripe, are f(A) 25-30 P roduct D escription fleshy and tender, and are practically 30 ((B) »21-24 intact; that the berries and accompany­ l(SStd) »0-20 § 52.5921 Product description. f(A) 34-40 ing liquor are practically free from de­ 40 ((B) *28-38 (a) “Maple sirup” means sirup made tached seed cells; and that not more than l(SStd) »0-27 by the evaporation of maple sap or by 5 percent by weight of blackberries may ((A) 26-30 30 ((B) »21-25 the solution of maple concrete (maple be crushed and not more than 10 percent l(SStd) »0-20 by weight of dewberries, boysenberries, sugar) and contains not more than 35 loganberries, youngberries, or other sim­ Total score______100 percent of water, and weighs not less ilar types may be crushed. Normal flavor and odor .. _ than 11 pounds to the gallon (231 cubic (c) (B) classification: If the frozen Grade______inches). berries possess a reasonably good char­ (b) The standards in this subpart are acter, a score of 21 to 25 points may be 1 Limiting rule. applicable to sirup which is packed in

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7579 drums or other large containers for fur­ Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades of Table (c) The sirup shall not be cloudier ther processing. It is not intended that Sirup than medium amber cloudy standard as they shall apply to sirup packed in con­ P roduct Description represented by the standards of the U.S. tainers for table use. Another set of Sec. Department of Agriculture for cloudi­ standards entitled “U.S. Standards for 52.5961 Product description. ness. Table Maple Sirup” has been issued for Grades § 52.5964 U.S. Grade B. this purpose (§§ 52.5961-52.5968). 52.5962 U.S. Grade AA (Fancy). & (a) U.S. Grade B Table Maple Sirup G rades 52.5963 TT.S. Grade A. shall consist of maple sirup which meets 52.5964 U.S. Grade B. § 52.5922 U.S. Grade AA (Fancy). 52.5965 Unclassified. the requirements for U.S. Grade A A (Fancy) Table Maple Sirup except for U.S. Grade AA (Fancy) Maple Sirup T olerances, Packing for Reprocessing shall consist of maple color and cloudiness. 52.5966 Tolerances for preceding grades. (b) The color shall not be darker than sirup which meets the following require­ 52.5967 Packing. dark amber as represented by the color ments: Explanation of T erms standards of the U.S. Department of (a) The color shall not be darker than Agriculture. light amber as represented by the color 52.5968 Explanation of terms. standards of the U.S. Department of (c) The sirup shall not be cloudier Agriculture. Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades than dark amber cloudy standard as rep­ of Table Sirup resented by the standards of the U.S. (b) The weight shall be not less than Dpartment of Agriculture for cloudiness. 11 pounds per gallon of 231 cubic inches P roduct D escription at 68 degrees F. corresponding to 65.46 § 52.5965 Unclassified. degrees Brix or 35.27 degrees Baumé (Bu­ § 52.5961 Product description. Unclassified Table Maple Sirup shall reau of Standards Baumé scale for sugar (a) “Maple sirup” means sirup made consist of maple sirup which has not been solutions, modulus 145). by the evaporation of maple sap or by classified in accordance with the fore­ (c) The sirup shall possess a charac­ the solution of maple concrete (maple going grades. The term “Unclassified” is teristic maple flavor, shall be free from sugar) and contains not more than 35 not a grade within the meaning of the fermentation and free from damage, percent of water, and weighs not less than standards in this subpart but is provided caused by scorching, buddiness, any ob­ 11 pounds to the gallon (231 cubic as a designation to show that no definite jectionable foreign flavor or odor or other inches). grade has been applied to the lot. means. “Damage” means any defect that (b) The standards in this subpart are materially affects the appearance or the issued for the purpose of classifying T o l e r a n c es, P a c k in g edibility or shipping quality of the sirup. maple sirup packed in containers for § 52.5966 Tolerances for preceding § 52.5923 U.S. Grade A. table use. It is not intended that they grades. shall apply to sirup which is packed in (a) U.S. Grade A Maple Sirup for Re­ drums or other large containers for later In order to allow for variations inci­ processing shall consist of maple sirup reprocessing. Another set of standards dent to proper grading and handling, not which meets the requirements of U.S, entitled “U.S. Standards for Maple more than 5 percent, by count, of the Grade AA (Fancy) Maple Sirup for Re­ Sirup for Reprocessing” has been issued containers in any lot may have sirup be­ processing except for color. for this purpose (§§ 52.5921-52.5926). low the requirements for the grade: Pro­ (b) The color shall be darker than vided, That no part of this tolerance shall light amber but shall not be darker than G rades be allowed for defects causing “serious medium amber as represented by the § 52.5962 U.S. Grade AA (Fancy). damage”: And provided further, That no color standards of the U.S. Department tolerance is permitted for sirup that is of Agriculture. U.S. Grade AA (Fancy) Table Maple darker in color than that which is re­ Sirup shall consist of maple sirup which quired for the next lower grade. § 52.5924 U.S. Grade B. meets the following requirements: (a) U.S. Grade B Maple Sirup for Re­ (a) The color shall not be darker than § 52.5967 Packing. processing shall consist of maple sirup light amber as represented by the color (a) Containers shall be clean and new which meets the requirements of U.S. standards of the U.S. Department of Ag­ in appearance. Tin containers shall not Grade AA (Fancy) Maple Sirup for Re­ riculture. be rusty. processing except for color. (b) The sirup shall not be cloudier (b) In order to allow for variations (b) The color shall be darker than than light amber cloudy standard as incident to proper packing, not more medium amber but shall not be darker represented by the standards of the U.S. than 5 percent, by count, of the con­ than dark amber as represented by the Department of Agriculture for cloudi­ tainers in any lot may fail to meet these color standards of the U.S. Department ness. requirements. of Agriculture. (c) The weight shall be not less than 11 pounds per gallon of 23.1 cubic inches E x p l a n a t io n o f T e r m s §52.5925 U.S. Grade C. at 68 degrees F. corresponding to 65.46 (a) U.S. Grade C Maple Sirup for Re­ degrees Brix or 35.27 degrees Baume § 52.5968 Explanation of terms. processing shall consist of. maple sirup (Bureau of Standards Baume scale for (a) “Cloudiness” means presence in which meets the requirements of U 5. sugar solutions, modulus 145). suspension of fine particles of mineral Grade AA (Fancy) Maple Sirup for Re­ (d) The sirup shall possess a charac­ matter, such as malate of lime, “niter,” processing except for color. teristic maple flavor, shall be clean, free “sugar sand,” or other substances that (b) The color shall be darker than from fermentation, and free from dam­ detract from the clearness of the sirup. dark amber represented by the color age caused by scorching, buddiness, any (b) “Clean” means that the sirup shall standards of the U.S, Department of objectionable flavor or odor or other be practically free from foreign material Agriculture. means. such as pieces of bark, soot, dust, and § 52.5926 Unclassified. § 52.5963 UJS. Grade A. dirt. (c) “Damage” means any defect that Unclassified Maple Sirup for Reproc­ (a) U.S. Grade A Table Maple Sirup materially affects the appearance or the essing shall consist of maple sirup which Shall consist of maple sirup which meets edibility or shipping quality of the sirup. has not been classified in accordance the requirements for U.S. Grade AA (d) “Serious damage” means any de­ with the foregoing grades. The term (Fancy) Table Maple Sirup except for fect that seriously affects the edibility Unclassified” is not a grade within the color and cloudiness. or market value of the sirup. Badly meaning of the standards in this sub­ (b) The color shall not he darker than scorched sirup, buddy sirup, fermented part but is provided as a designation to medium amber as represented by the sirup or sirup that has any distasteful show that no definite grade has been color standards of the U.S. Department foreign flavor or disagreeable odor shall applied to the lot. of Agriculture. be considered as seriously damaged.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7580 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Subpart— U.S. Standards for Grades of Canned requirements of. U.S. Grade C or U.S. Table No. I Succotash Standard. P roduct Description, Grades Proportions by weight P roportion of I ngredients Sec. 52.6001 Product description. § 52.6006 Proportion of ingredients. Not less Not more 52.6002 U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy. than than 52.6003 U.S. Grade B or U.S. Extra Stand­ (a) Federal certificates of grade shall ard. indicate the approximate percentage of Percent Percent 52.6004 U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard. ingredients found upon examination. 60 «JA 52.6005 Grade D or Substandard. If whole-grain style corn is an ingredi­ 26 50 X&A 30 P roportion op I ngredients ent, the percentage of ingredients shall Lima beansj dry “ soaked”. . . . IVA 30 52.6006 Proportion of ingredients. be based on drained weight; otherwise, 10 30 F ill op Container, Drained Weight Method the percentage of ingredients shall be 52.6007 Recommended fill of container. based on net weight. F ill of Container, D rained W eight 52.6008 Method for ascertaining drained (b) The following mixtures of vege­ Method weight. tables in canned succotash shall conform § 52.6007 Recommended fill of con­ Work Sheet with the proportions indicated in Table tainer. 52.6009 Work sheet for canned succotash. No. I: The container shall be filled with suc­ Subparf— U.S. Standards for Grades cotash as full as practicable without im­ Cream-style corn and snap beans. pairment of quality. The product and of Canned Succotash Cream-style corn and lima beans (fresh or frozen). packing medium shall occupy not less P roduct D escription, Grades Cream-style com and lima beans (dry, than 90 percent of the total volume § 52.6001 Product description. “soaked”) . Cream-style com, snap beans, and to­ capacity of the container. Canned succotash is composed of matoes. § 52.6008 Method for ascertaining cream-style or whole-grain com and Cream-style com, lima beans (fresh or drained weight. lima beans or snap beans, with or with­ frozen), and tomatoes. out tomatoes; may be packed with the Cream-style corn, lima beans (dry, Drained weights of canned succotash addition of water, with or without the “soaked”), and tomatoes. containing whole-grain' corn are deter­ Whole-grain com and snap beans. addition of sugar or salt; and is suffi­ Whole-grain com and lima beans (fresh mined by emptying the contents of the ciently processed by heat to assure pres­ or frozen). container upon a circular sieve of proper ervation of the product in hermetically Whole-grain corn and lima beans (dry, diameter, containing eight meshes to the sealed containers. “soaked”) . inch (0.097-inch perforations) and al­ § 52.6002 U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy. Whole-grain corn, snap beans, and to­ matoes. lowing to drain for 2 minutes. A sieve 8 U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy canned Whole-grain corn, lima beans (fresh or inches in diameter is used for No. 2% succotash consists of cream-style or frozen), and tomatoes. cans and smaller, and a sieve 12 inches whole-grain sweet com and lima or snap Whole-grain corn, lima beans (dry, beans, which meet the requirements of “soaked”) , and tomatoes. in diameter is used for No. 10 cans. U.S. Grade A or U.S. Fancy, for the W ork S heet respective canned or frozen commodities. If tomatoes are an ingredient, they must § 52.6009 Work sheet for canned succotash. meet the requirements of U.S. Grade A canned tomatoes for color and absence No., Size and kind of container. of defects. Label.___ . ______§ 52.6003 U.S. Grade B or U.S. Extra Standard. Cans/Glass U.S. Grade B or U.S. Extra Standard Container mark or identification Average canned succotash consists of cream-style Cases or whole-grained sweet corn and lima or snap beans which meet the require­ Net weight ments of UJ3. Grade B or U.S. Extra Vacuum (ir Standard for the respective canned or Drained we frozen commodities. If tomatoes are an ingredient, they must meet the require­ ments of U.S. Grade B canned tomatoes Percent for color and absence of defects. of each §52.6004 U.S. Grade C or U.S. Stand­ ard.

U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard canned Grade succotash consists of cream-style or of each whole-grain sweet com and lima or snap beans which meet the requirements of U.S. Grade C or U.S. Standard for the respective canned or frozen commodities. Grad If tomatoes are an ingredient, they must meet the requirements of U.S. Grade C (Secs. 203, 205, 60 Stat. 1087, as amended, Dated: May 16,1967. canned tomatoes for color and absence 1090, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1622, 1624) G. R. Grange, of defects. ' Deputy Administrator, § 52.6005 Grade D or Substandard. Effective date. This codification is ef­ Marketing Services. Grade D or Substandard canned suc­ fective upon publication in the F ederal [F.R. Doc. 67-5660; Filed, May 23, 1967; cotash is succotash that fails to meet the R egister. 8:45 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7581

Chapter VIII— Agricultural Stabiliza­ mainland quota for that area will not be calendar year 1967 Puerto Rico and the tion and Conservation Service limited as a result of the deficit determi­ Virgin Islands will be unable by 415,000 (Sugar), Department of Agriculture nation and proration provided herein. and 15,000 short tons, raw value, respec­ The Government of The Republic of tively, to fill the quota? established for SUBCHAPTER B— SUGAR REQUIREMENTS AND the Philippines has notified the Depart­ such areas in subparagraph (1) of this QUOTAS ment that it will be unable to fill its paragraph. Pursuant to section 204(b) [Sugar Reg. 811, Arndt. 7] statutory share of any deficit during the of the Act the determination of such defi­ calendar year 1967. Therefore, pursuant cits shall not affect the quotas estab­ PART 811-—CONTINENTAL SUGAR to section 204(a) of the Act the entire lished in subparagraph (1) of this para­ REQUIREMENTS AND AREA QUOTAS deficit declaration of 430,000 short tons, graph. Requirements, Quotas and Quota raw value, is prorated and allocated to * * * * * Deficits for 1967 Western Hemisphere countries. Three 2. Section 811.52 is added to read as hundred and twenty-five thousand short follows: Basis and purpose and bases and con­ siderations. This amendment is issued tons, raw value, are prorated to Western § 811.52 Proration and allocation of pursuant to the authority vested in the Hemisphere countries on the basis of deficits and quotas in effect. Secretary of Agriculture by the Sugar quotas established pursuant to Amend­ (a) It is hereby determined that the Act of 1948, as amended (61 Stat. 922, as ment 6 of Sugar Regulation 811 for 1967. Republic of the Philippines will be unable amended), hereinafter referred to as the The remainder of the deficit is allocated to fill any of its statutory share of deficits “Act”. The purpose of this amendment to herein to the Dominican Republic pur­ during the calendar year 1967. The defi­ Sugar Regulation 811 (31 P.R. 15581, as cits in quotas determined in paragraph amended) is to determine and to prorate suant to the following determination (a) (2) of § 811.51 of 430,000 short tons, and allocate the deficits in quotas estab­ issued by the President. raw value, are hereby prorated and allo­ lished pursuant to the Act. Th e White House cated pursuant to section 204(a) of the Act to Western Hemisphere countries Section 204(a) of the Act provides WASHINGTON, MAY 11, 1967 that the Secretary shall from time to with quotas in effect. In accordance with time determine whether any area or Memorandum for: The Secretary of Agri­ a Presidential Memorandum dated May country will be unable to fill its quota or culture. proration of a quota. On the basis of the Subject: Finding pursuant to Section 204 11,1967, 105,000 short tons, raw value, of (a) of the Sugar Act of 1948, as amended by the deficit proration is herein allocated quotas established for Puerto Rico and the Sugar Act Amendments of 1965. the Virgin Islands for the calendar year In view of the restoration of stable political to the Dominican Republic. The remain­ 1967 in § 811.51 of this part and the sup­ conditions in the Dominican Republic and der of the deficits totaling 325,000 short ply of sugar expected to be available the establishment of a democratically elected tons, raw value, is prorated to Western from those areas for marketing in the Government, in accordance with the recom­ Hemisphere countries on the basis of continental United States during the mendation of the Conference Report on the calendar year 1967, it is herein found Sugar Act Amendments of 1965, that the quotas established in Sugar Regulation President use his authority to assign deficits 811, Amendment 6 for 1967. that Puerto Rico will be unable to fill its to provide additional quota for the Domini­ quota by 415,000 short tons, raw value, can Republic if the political situation in that (b) In establishing deficit prorations and the Virgin Islands will be unable to Republic warrants such action, and pursuant herein for Western Hemisphere countries fill its quota of 15,000 short tons, raw to Section 204(a) of the Sugar Act of 1948, consideration has been given to the pur­ value. Accordingly, quota deficits of as amended by the Sugar Act Amendments chase of U.S. agricultural commodities 430,000 short tons, raw value, are deter­ of J1965, I hereby determine that in view -of mined herein for Puerto Rico and the the unique and heavy burden of rehabilita­ by such countries, by determining that tion expenditure on the Government of the the value of U.S. agricultural exports to Virgin Islands. Dominican Republic in 1967 it would be in Production of sugar in Puerto Rico in the national interest to give the Dominican each such country exceeded the total 1967 is estimated to approximate 840,000 Republic a special allocation of about 105,000 net receipts f.a.s. port of shipment de­ short tons, raw value. Making allowance short tons of sugar from the unused Philip­ rived from the sale of sugar from deficit for the quantity of sugar required for pine share of the Puerto Rican and Virgin prorations imported from each such local consumption and inventory varia­ Islands deficits and its pro rata share of the balance of those deficits and of any other country during the most recent 12-month tions, it is expected that the supply of deficits that might be declared in 1967. period for which data are available. sugar from that area available for mar­ Tou are directed to take the necessary steps Each foreign country which is unable to keting in the continental United States to allocate deficits in accordance with this finding. fill its quota including its deficit prora­ will be about 725,000 short tons, raw Lyndon B. J ohnson. tion has the responsibility to notify the value. The sugar industry of the Virgin By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary the extent of and reasons for Islands terminated'production of sugar Secretary of Agriculture by the Act, Part such shortfall. with the 1966 crop and no plans are cur­ rently in prospect for any resumption of 811 of this chapter is hereby amended by 3. Section 811.53 is amended by adding a new § 811.52 and by amending sugar production in the future. Accord­ amending paragraph (c) to read as §§ 811.51 and 811.53 as follows: ingly, quota deficits of 415,000 short tons, follows: raw value, for Puerto Rico and 15,000 1. Section 811.51 is amended by desig­§ 811.53 Quotas for foreign countries. short tons, raw value, for the Virgin Is­ nating paragraph (a) as paragraph * * * ♦ * lands are herein determined and are pro­ (a) (1) and by adding paragraph (a) (c) For the calendar year 1967, the rated and allocated to foreign countries (2) as follows: prorations to individual foreign countries pursuant to section 204(a) of the Act. § 811.51 Quotas for domestic areas. other than the Republic of the Philip­ If production exceeds the present esti­ (a )(1) * * * pines pursuant to paragraphs (c) and mates for Puerto Rico, the marketing op­ (2) It is hereby determined pursuant (d) of section 202 and paragraph (a) portunities for that area within the total to section 204(a) of the Act that for the of section 204 of the Act are as follows:

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 No. loo— 4 7582 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Chapter IX— Consumer and Market­ § 922.307 Apricot Regulation 7. ing Service (Marketing Agreements (a) Order: (1) Apricot Regulation 5 and Orders; Fruits, Vegetables, is hereby terminated at 12:01 a.m., P.d.t., Nuts), Department of Agriculture June 1, 1967. Countries [Apricot Reg. 7] (2) During the period beginning at 12:01 a.m., P.d.t., June 1, 1967, and end­ PART 922— APRICOTS GROWN IN ing June 30, 1968, no handler shall han­ prorations prorations prorations pursuant > to202(a) sec. Deficits and deficit * andDeficits deficit * Total quotas and Temporary quotasand Basic quotas DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASH­ dle any container of apricots unless: INGTON (i) SUch apricots grade not less than a hort tons, raw vali e) Washington No. 1 and are at least rea­ Limitation of Shipments sonably uniform in color: Provided, That Mexico______211,499 222,079 62,508 496,086 Dominican Findings. (1) Pursuant to the market­ if such apricots are the Moorpark vari­ Republic___ 206,848 217,194 166,134 590,176 ety in open containers they are generally B ra z il______206,848 217,194 61,134 485,176 ing agreement, as amended, and Order Peru______1641986 173,239 48,761 386,986 No. 922, as amended (7 CFR Part 922), well matured; and British West regulating the handling of apricots (ii) Such apricots measure not less Indies_____ 82,630 73,448 22,502 178,580 than 1% inches in diameter: Provided, Equador_____ 30,097 31,602 8,895 70,594 grown in designated counties in Wash­ French West ington, effective under the applicable That apricots of the Blenheim, Blenril, Indies_____ 25,993 23,104 7,078 66,175 and Tilton varieties when packed in un­ Argentina____ 25,446 26| 718 7,520 59,684 provisions of the Agricultural Market­ Costa Rica___ 24,351 25,574 7,198 57,123 ing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended lidded containers may measure not less N icaragua____ 24,351 25,574 7,198 57,123 than 1Î4 inches: And provided further, Colombia____ 21,889 22,983 6,649 51,34) (7 U.S.C. 601-674), and upon the basis Guatemala___ 20,521 21,551 6,065 48,137 of the recommendations of the Washing­ That not more than 10 percent, by count, Panama_____ 15,322 16,088 4,528 35,938 of such apricots may fail to meet the ap­ El Salvador__ 15,049 15,804 4,448 35,301 ton Apricot Marketing Committee, es­ Haiti______11,492 12,066 3,396 26,954 tablished under the aforesaid amended plicable minimum diameter require­ Venezuela____ 10,397 10,916 3,073 24,386 marketing agreement and order, and ment. British (3) Notwithstanding any other pro­ Honduras__ 6,019 5,351 1,639 13,009 upon other available information, it is Bolivia______2,462 2,586 728 5,776 hereby found that the limitation of ship­ vision of this section, any individual Honduras____ 2,462 2,571 726 5,759 shipment of apricots which meets each 98,499 87,000 185,499 ments of apricots, in the manner herein Republic of provided, will tend to effectuate the of the following requirements may be 41,041 36,250 77,291 handled without regard to the provisions 39^400 34,800 74,200 declared policy of the act. South Africa... 29,003 25,616 54,619 (2) It is hereby further found that itof this paragraph, of § 922.41 (Assess­ Fiji Islands___ 21,615 19,092 40,707 is impracticable and contrary to the ments) , and of § 922.55 (Inspection and 9,029 7,975 17,004 certification) : 9^029 Ti 975 17,004 public interest to give preliminary notice, Malagasv engage in public rule-making procedure, (i) The shipment consists of apricots Republic___ 4,651 4,108 8,759 sold at the orchard for home use and 3,557 3,142 6,699 and postpone the effective date of this A 351 0 5,351 regulation until 30 days after publica­ not for resale; (ii) The shipment does not, in the Total___ 1,369,837 1,371,600 430,000 3,171,437 tion thereof in the F ederal R egister (5 U.S.C. 553) in that, as hereinafter set aggregate, exceed 500 pounds, net weight, forth, the time intervening between the of apricots; and 1 Includes the proration of quotas withheld from Cuba (iii) Each container^ is stamped or and Southern Rhodesia. date when information upon which this 2 Reflects 105,000 short tons, raw value, allocated to the regulation is based became available and marked with the words “not for resale” Dominican Republic by Presidential Memorandum in letters at least one-half inch in height. dated May 11, 1967. The remainder of the deficits was the time when this regulation must be­ prorated to all Western Hemisphere countries with quotas come effective in order to effectuate the (b) Terms used in the amended mar­ in effect. declared policy of the act is insufficient; keting agreement and order shall, when used herein, have the same meaning as (Secs. 201, 202, 204 and 403; Stat. 023, as a reasonable time is permitted, under amended, 924, as amended, 925, as amended, the circumstances, for preparation for is given to the respective term in said and 7 U.S.C. 1111, 1112, 1114, and 1153) such effective time; and good cause ex­ amended marketing agreement and or­ ists for making the provisions hereof der; “diameter” and “Washington No. 1” Effective date. This action establishes effective not later than June 1, 1967. A shall have the same meaning as when deficits of 430,000 short tons, raw value, reasonable determination as to the sup­ used in the State of Washington Depart­ and prorates and allocates such deficits ply of, and the demand for, such apricots ment of Agriculture “Washington Stand­ to Western Hemisphere countries with must await the development of the crop ards for Apricots,” effective May 31,1966; sugar quotas in effect. To permit such and adequate information thereon was “reasonably uniform in color” means countries for which larger quotas or pro­ not available to the Washington Apricot that the apricots in the individual con­ rations are hereby established to plan Marketing Committee until it met on tainer do not show sufficient variation and to market in an orderly manner the April 25, 1967; recommendation as to in color to materially affect the general larger quantity of sugar, it is essential at the need for, and the extent of, regula­ appearance of the apricots; and “gen­ this time that all persons selling and pur­ tion of shipments of such apricots was erally well matured” means that, with chasing sugar for consumption in the made at the said meeting of the com­ respect to not less than 90 percent, by continental United States be promptly mittee, after consideration of all avail­ count, of the apricots in any lot of con­ informed of the changes in marketing able information relative to the supply tainers, and not less than 85 percent, by count, of such apricots in any container opportunities. Therefore, it is hereby de­ and demand conditions for such apricots, at which time the recommendation and in such lot, at least 40 percent of the sur­ termined and found that compliance supporting information were submitted face area of the fruit is at least as yellow with the notice, procedure, and effective • to the Department; necessary supple­ as Shade 4 on the U.S. Standard Ground date requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553 is un­ mental data for consideration in con­ Color Chart for Apples and Pears in the necessary, impracticable, and contrary nection with the specifications of the Western States. to the public interest and this amend­ provisions were not available until May ment shall be effective upon publication 10, 1967, shipments of the current crop (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 T7.S.C. of such apricots will begin on or about 601-674) in the F ederal R egister. June 1, 1967, and this regulation should Signed at Washington, D.C., this 17th be applicable, insofar as practicable, to Dated: May 19,1967. all shipments of such apricots in order day of May 1967. F loyd F. Hedlund, to effectuate the declared policy of the Director, Fruit and Vegetable Orville L. F reeman, act; and compliance with the provisions Division, Consumer and Mar­ Secretary. of this regulation will not require of han­ dlers any preparation therefor which keting Service. [F.R. Doe. 67-5692; Filed, May 23, 1967; cannot be completed by the effective time [FJR. Doc. 67-5776; Filed, May 23, 1967; 8:45 am.] hereof. 8:49 am.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7583 Chapter X— Consumer and Market­ Signed at Washington, D.C., on May poultry because of contagious, infectious, ing Service (Marketing Agreements 18,1967. and communicable diseases, is hereby and Orders; Milk), Department of George L. Mehren, amended in the following respects: Agriculture Assistant Secretary. 1. Paragraph (e) of § 71.3 is redesig­ [F.R. Doc. 67-5757; Filed, May 23, 1967; nated as paragraph (f) of said section. [Milk Order 125] 8:47 am.] 2. A new paragraph (e) is added to said § 71.3 to readbs follows: PART 1125— MILK IN PUGET SOUND, Chapter XIV— Commodity Credit Cor­ § 71.3 ■ ■ Interstate movement of diseased WASH., MARKETING AREA animals and poultry generally pro­ poration, Department of Agriculture hibited. Order Suspending Certain Provision SUBCHAPTER A— GENERAL REGULATIONS AND ***** Pursuant to the provisions of the Agri­ POLICIES (e) Notwithstanding the provisions of cultural Marketing Agreement Act of [Arndt. 4] paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Director of the Division in specific and of the order regulating the handling PART 1400— RULES OF CONTRACT cases and under such conditions as he of milk in the Puget Sound, Wash., mar­ DISPUTES BOARD FOR COMMOD­ may prescribe to prevent the dissemina­ keting area (7 CFR Part 1125), it is ITY CREDIT CORPORATION tion of disease may provide for the inter­ hereby found and determined that: state movement of individual animals (a) The following provision of the or­ Manner of Filing Appeals and affected with contagious, infectious, or der no longer tends to effectuate the de­ Hearings communicable disease to a designated clared policy of the Act and is hereby The rules of the Contract Disputes diagnostic or research facility when ac­ suspended: In paragraph (c) (3) of Board for Commodity Credit Corpora­ companied by a permit from the ap­ § 1125.44 (interplant movement provi­ tion, as amended, and revised (14 F.R. propriate livestock sanitary official in sions) the provision “located in the mar­ 1865, 20 F.R. 8535, 28 F.R. 579, 28 F.R. the State of destination: Provided, That keting area or within any of the counties 13293, 29 F.R. 10495, and 30 F.R. 8457) animals so moved shall be maintained in of Kitsap, Mason, Clallam, Jefferson, and are further amended as follows: quarantine at such designated facility Pierce in the State of Washington,”. The 1. Section 1400.5(a) is amended by until freed of disease as determined by provision relates to the classification of deleting the period at the end of the last tests recognized by the Department, until milk moved by transfer or diversion from sentence of the paragraph and adding natural death, or until disposal by a pool plant to a nonpool plant. the following: “, unless the appeal is from euthanasia. (b) Thirty days notice of the effective a finding of fact of a Contracting Officer ***** date hereof is impractical, unnecessary, of the Corporation within'the scope of (Secs. 4, 5, 23 Stat. 32, as amended, sec. 1, 2, and contrary to the public interest in and required by a contract disputes 32 Stat. 791-792, as amended; 21 TJ.S.C. 111- that: clause which provides a method for final 113, 115, 120; 29 F.R. 16210, as amended; 30 (1) This suspension order does not re­ and conclusive determination of disputed F.R. 5799, as amended) quire of persons affected substantial or questions of fact.” Effective date. The foregoing amend­ extensive preparation prior to the effec­ 2. Section 1400.8(f) is amended by tive date. ment shall become effective upon publi­ deleting subparagraph (2). cation in the F ederal R egister. (2) This suspension order is necessary Effective date: Date of publication. À The amendment permits the Director to reflect current marketing conditions of the Animal Health Division to author­ and to maintain orderly marketing con­ Signed at Washington, D.C., on May ize the interstate movement of specific ditions iii the marketing area. 18, 1967. animals which are affected with conta­ (3) This suspension will permit the gious, infectious, or communicable dis­ Class II classification of milk (under cer­ H. D. Godfrey, eases to a designated diagnostic or re­ tain conditions and within certain limits) Executive Vice President, search center in accordance with speci­ which is transferred or diverted to a Commodity Credit Corporation. fied conditions. It has been determined nonpool plant regardless of its location. W. E. Underhill, that the movement of animals in accord­ The order presently provides that milk ance with the provisions of the amend­ which is transferred or diverted to a Chairman, Contract Disputes Board for Commodity Credit ment would not endanger the livestock nonpool plant located outside the mar­ Corporation. of the United States. keting area or outside of a designated The amendment relieves certain re­ five-county area be classified as Class I. [F.R. Doc. 67-5774; Filed, May 23, 1967; strictions presently imposed, and must (4) This suspension is needed to per­ 8:49 a.m.] be made effective promptly to be of maxi­ mit an association of producers supply­ ing the market to move reserve milk for mum benefit to persons subject to the re­ which it has been unable to find an out­ strictions which are relieved. Accord­ let in the marketing area to a nonpool Title 9— ANIMALS AND ingly, under the administrative proce­ plant located outside of the marketing dure provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, it is found area. upon good cause that notice and other ANIMAL PRODUCTS public procedure with respect to the (5) Interested parties were afforded amendment are impracticable and un­ opportunity to file written data, views, or Chapter I— Agricultural Research necessary, and the amendment may be a™ e n t s concerning this suspension Service, Department of Agriculture made effective less than 30 days after (32 F.R. 7025). None, was filed in oppo­ publication in the F ederal R egister. sition to the proposed suspension. SUBCHAPTER C— -INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF ANIMALS AND POULTRY Done at Washington, D.C., this 19th Therefore, good cause exists for mak­ day of May 1967. ing this order effective upon publication PART 71— GENERAL PROVISIONS E. P. R eagan, in the F ederal R e g is t e r . Interstate Movement of Diseased Acting Deputy Administrator, H is therefore ordered, That the afore­ Animals Agricultural Research Service. said provision of the order is hereby [F.R. Doc. 67-5760; Filed, May 23, 1967; suspended for an indefinite period. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act 8:47 am.] of February 2, 1903, as amended, the Act trcTn 48 Stat- 31’ 08 amended; 7 of May 29, 1884, as amended, and the PART 73— SCABIES IN CATTLE U.S.C. 601-674) Act of July 2, 1962 (21 U.S.C. 111-113, 115, 117, 120, 129-132), Part 71, Title 9, Revocation of Quarantine Effective date: Upon publication in the Code of Federal Regulations, restricting Federal Register. Pursuant to sections 1 and 3 of the Act the interstate movement of animals and of March 3, 1905, 33 Stat. 1264-1265, as

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7584 RULES AND REGULATIONS amended, sections 4 and 5 of the Act of § 215.1 Definitions. 375a) and this part certain indebtedness May 29, 1884, 23 Stat. 32, as amended, For the purposes of this part: of an executive officer to a bank other sections 1 and 2 of the Act of February than his own bank arising out of the use 2,1903,32 Stat. 791-792, as amended, and • * * • * of charge accounts and credit card or sections 3 and 11 of the Act of July 2, (c) “Loan”, “loaning”, “extension ofcheck credit plans. It would also exclude 1962, 76 Stat. 130, 132 (21 U.S.C. 111- credit”, and “extend credit". The terms an executive officer’s indebtedness to his 113, 120, 121, 123, 125, 134b, 134f), the “loan", “loaning", “extension of credit", own bank arising from such transactions provisions in § 73.1a of Part 73, Title 9, and “extend credit” mean the making of except in the case of a particular in­ Code of Federal Regulations, as amended, a loan or the extending of credit in any debtedness that involves prior individual quarantining certain areas in California manner whatsoever, and include: clearance or approval by his bank other and Texas because of cattle scabies, are (1) Any advance by means of an over­ than routine confirmation of the right to hereby revoked. draft, cash item, or otherwise; incur such indebtedness required of all Effective date. This revocation shall (2) The acquisition by discount, pur­ participants in the general plan, but in chase, exchange, or otherwise of any no event to the extent that the aggregate become effective upon publication in the note, draft, bill of exchange, or other F ederal R egister. However, such provi­ amount of his indebtedness exceeds evidence of indebtedness upon which an $1,000. Because of its impersonal nature, sions shall be deemed to continue in full executive officer may be liable as maker, force and effect for the purpose of sus­ indebtedness of the type within the cov­ taining any action or other proceeding drawer, indorser, guarantor, or surety; erage of the new exclusion is not re­ with respect to any right that accrued, (3) The increase of an existing in­ garded as falling within the general debtedness, except on account of accrued intent of section 22(g) of the Federal liability that was incurred, or violation interest or on account of taxes, insur­ that occurred prior to said date. Reserve Act. However, in order to guard This action releases from quarantine ance, or other expenses incidental to the against abuses or evasions of the basic existing indebtedness and advanced by purposes of the law, the amendment pre­ Merced County in California and Briscoe, the bank for its own protection; Castro, Floyd, Hale, Lamb, Motley, scribes certain limitations in the case of (4) Any advance of unearned salary indebtedness of an executive officer to Randall, and Swisher Counties in Texas, or other unearned compensation for pe­ heretofore quarantined because of cattle his own bank. riods in excess of 30 days; and b. This amendment was the subject of scabies. Hereafter, the restrictions per­ (5) Any other transaction as a result taining to the interstate movement of notices of proposed rule making pub­ of which an executive officer becomes lished in the F ederal R egister (31 F.R. cattle from quarantined areas, contained obligated to a bank, directly or indirectly in 9 CFR Part 73, as amended, will not 11399, Aug. 27, 1966, and 32 F.R. 4124, apply to such counties. However, the re­ by any means whatsoever, by reason of Mar. 16, 1967) and was adopted after an indorsement on an obligation or consideration of all relevant material, strictions pertaining to such movement otherwise, to pay money or its equivalent. from nonquarantined areas, contained including responses received from inter­ in this part, will apply thereto. Such terms, however, do not include: ested persons pursuant to these notices. This revocation relieves certain re­ (i) Advances against accrued salary Dated at Washington, D.C., this 15th strictions presently imposed, and must or other accrued compensation, or for the day of May 1967. be made effective immediately to be of purpose of providing for the payment qf maximum benefit to persons subject to authorized travel or other expenses in­ By order of the Board of Governors. the restrictions which are relieved. Ac­ curred or to be incurred on behalf of the [seal! Merritt Sherman, cordingly, under the administrative pro­ bank; Secretary. cedure provisions in 5 U.S.C. 553, it is (ii) The acquisition by a bank of any [F.R. Doc. 67-5732; Filed, May 23, 1967; found upon good cause that notice and check deposited in or delivered to the 8:45 a.m.] other public procedure with respect to bank in the usual course of business un­ the revocation are impracticable and un­ less it results in the granting of an over­ necessary, and the revocation may be draft to or the carrying of a cash item made effective less than 30 days after for an executive officer; Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND publication in the F ederal R egister. (iii) The acquisition of any note, draft, (Secs. 1, 3, 33 Stat. 1264-1265, as amended, bill of exchange, or other evidence of in­ SPACE secs. 4, 5, 23 Stat. 32, as amended, secs. 1, 2, debtedness, through a merger or con­ 32 Stat. 791-792, as amended, secs. 3, 11, 76 solidation of banks or a similar transac­ Chapter I— Federal Aviation Adminis­ Stat. 130, 132; 21 TT.S.C. 111-113, 120, 121, tion by which a bank acquires assets and tration, Department of Transporta­ 123, 125, 134b, 134f; interpret or apply secs. assumes liabilities of another bank or 2, 4, 33 Stat. 1264-1265, as amended, secs. 6, similar organization, or through fore­ tion 7, 23 Stat. 32, as amended; 21 U.S.C. 115, 117, closure on collateral or similar proceed­ [Docket No. 8179; Amdt. 13-5] 124, 126; 29 F.R. 16210, as amended, 30 F.R. ing for the protection of the bank; or PART 13— ENFORCEMENT 5799, as amended) (iv) Indebtedness arising by reason of Done at Washington, D.C., this 18th general arrangements under which a PROCEDURES day of May 1967. bank (a) acquires charge or time credit Administrative Disposition of E. P. R eagan, accounts or (b) makes payments to or on Violations Acting Deputy Administrator, behalf of participants in a bank credit Agricultural Research Service. card plan, check credit plan, or similar The purpose of this amendment is to [F.R. Doc. 67-5777; Filed, May 23, 1967; plan, except that this subdivision (iv) clarify the distinction between the ad­ 8:49 a.m.] shall not apply to indebtedness of an ministrative disposition of violations that executive officer to his own bank to the are handled by Flight Standards per­ extent that the aggregate amount thereof sonnel in the field and legal enforcement exceeds $1,000 or to any such indebted­ actions that are processed by the FAA Title 12— BANKS AND BANKING ness to his own bank that involves prior counsel. In furthering the FAA decentraliza­ Chapter II— Federal Reserve System individual clearance or approval by the bank other than for the purpose of de­ tion program and to provide greater dis­ SUBCHAPTER A— BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF termining whether his participation in cretion at the lowest operational level, THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM the arrangement is authorized or authority is being given to personnel at [Reg. O] whether any dollar limit has been or that level to make final disposition by would be exceeded. administrative action in place of legal PART 215— LOANS TO EXECUTIVE ♦ * * * * enforcement action, whenever it is de­ OFFICERS OF MEMBER BANKS termined to be the most appropriate 2a. The purpose of this amendment is means'of obtaining compliance with the Exemption of Certain Indebtedness to add a new subdivision (iv) that ex­ Federal Aviation Regulations. 1. Effective July 1, 1967, §215.1(0 iscludes from the coverage of section 22(g) At present a violation disposed of by amended to read as follows: of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. letter of reprimand is considered a legal

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7585 enforcement a c t i o n (§13.13). This amending, suspending or revoking the amended to permit the proof test of un­ amendment establishes safety compli­ respondent’s certificate. The certificate pressurized aircraft with the static pres­ ance notices including a reprimand to action imposed may not be more severe sure system evacuated to an altimeter violator if appropriate and letters of cor­ than that proposed in the notice of pro­ reading of 1,000 feet above the airplane rection as administrative" actions. Con­ posed certificate actipn. If the Hearing elevation at the time of the test. sequently, § 13.13 is deleted and § 13.67 Officer finds that the allegations of the It was recommended that § 25.1325(c) (a) is amended to delete authority of notice have been proved, but that no (2) (ii) be changed in its entirety to pro­ PAA Hearing Officers to issue repri­ sanction is required, he makes appro­ vide a new leak test tolerance formula mands. Section 13.11 is rewritten and priate findings and orders the notice that would reduce test ambiguities re­ placed into a new Subpart B—Adminis­ terminated. If the Hearing Officer finds sulting from calculating the 2 percent trative Actions. The remaining sections that the allegations of the notice have tolerance using pounds per square inch in present Subpart B are unchanged and not been proved, he orders the notice or feet altitude at different airport ele­ are placed in new Subpart C—Legal En­ dismissed. If the Hearing Officer finds it vations. In this connection, the FAA forcement Actions, and present Subpart to be equitable and in the public interest, previously investigated the feasibility of C is redesignated as Subpart D. he may order the proceeding terminated establishing a quantitative static system Since this amendment is procedural in upon payment by the respondent of a test. That investigation, however, indi­ nature and does not impose a burden on civil penalty in an amount agreed upon cated that a quantitative test was much any person, notice and public procedure by the parties. too complex for general use but that the thereon are not required and the amend­ ***** simplified qualitative test would be satis­ ment may be made effective immediately. (Secs. 302(f), 303(d), 313(a), 1001, Federal factory and would provide adequate re­ In consideration of the foregoing, Part Aviation. Act of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1343, 1344, sults without any adverse effect on 13 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 1354,1481) safety. The latter was accordingly pro­ (14 CFR Part 13) is amended, effective Issued in Washington, D.C., on May posed in the notice. In the interest of May 23, 1967, as follows: 16, 1967. simplicity and ease of performance, the 1. By amending the heading of Sub­ FAA is retaining the test references in part. A to read “Subpart A—Investiga­ W illiam F. McK ee, terms of feet altitude even though this tive Procedures”; Administrator. qualitative approach may give minor 2. By amending the heading of Sub­ [F.R. Doc. 67-5738; Filed, May 23, 1967; differences in test results where the tests part B, and § 13.11, to read as follows: 8:46 a.m.] are run at different field elevations. Subpart B— Administrative Actions One commentator stated that the [Docket No. 7831; Arndts. 23-6, 25-12, 43-7, proposed § 23.1325(b) (3) requirement § 13.11 Administrative disposition of 91-40] for a correction card where altimeter certain violations. readings on primary and alternate static ALTIMETER SYSTEM (a) If it is found that a violation of systems differ by more than 50 feet, is too the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, or an REQUIREMENTS restrictive at high altitudes and high order or regulation issued under it, does Miscellaneous Amendments to Mach numbers and suggested clarifica­ not require legal enforcement action, a Chapter tion as to the range of altitude and Mach Flight Standards inspector or other ap­ numbers applying to this tolerance. propriate official may issue a safety com­ The purpose of this amendment to However, the FAA believes that the pro­ pliance notice including a letter of repri­ Parts 23, 25, 43, and 91 of the Federal posed requirement is necessary to as­ mand to the violator if appropriate, or Aviation Regulations is to revise the sure proper vertical separation consider­ a letter of correction that confirms de­ design standards concerning static pres­ ing the entire altitude-speed range. In cisions and states the corrective action sure systems and to revise the test re­ the high Mach—high altitude regime, agreed to as acceptable to the FAA. quirements applicable to the mainte­ the static system accuracy may be mar­ (b) Except for any case in which the nance of altimeter systems. ginal at best and errors introduced while agreed upon corrective action is not suc­ This amendment is based on a notice of on the alternate system could lead to cessfully completed, any action taken un­ proposed rule making (Notice No. 66- hazardous operation if the pilot is not der paragraph (a) of this section termi­ 44) published in the F ederal R egister informed of the magnitude of the error. nates the matter upon which the action on December 31, 1966 (31 F.R. 16790). In the low speed—low altitude regime, was based. If the agreed upon corrective Numerous eomments were received in static system errors are minimized so action is not successfully completed, legal response to Notice 66-44, most of which that correspondence between the two enforcement action may be initiated. were in agreement with the proposal. systems should pose no problem. The more pertinent of the comments As noted by one commentator, the first § 13.13 [Deleted] that raised questions together with the altitude entry in Table I, Appendix E, 3. By deleting § 13.13 and inserting the changes in the proposal resulting there­ Part 43, was inadvertently printed as following new heading before § 13.15: from are discussed hereinafter. 1,000 feet when it should have been With reference to the static pressure —1,000. The table has been corrected ac­ Subpart C— Legal Enforcement system proof test required under both cordingly. Actions Part 23 and Part 25, an inconsistency in One of the comments contained a rec­ § 13.19 [Amended] wording wqs noted in regard to the pres­ ommendation that section (c) of Ap­ sure differential at which the tests are pendix E should be changed to require 4. By strikingaeut the words “Subpart run for unpressurized aircraft. Since recording of date and test altitude on C” in the last sentence of § 13.19(c) and there is no reason for different require­ inserting the words “Subpart D” in place the altimeter dial. The FAA does not, ments, § 25.1325(c) (2) (i) has been modi­ however, agree with the recommended thereof. fied to require a pressure differential of 5. By redesignating present Subpart C change. Such a requirement would result as Subpart D. approximately 1 inch of mercury rather in the unnecessary cluttering of the in­ than the absolute value of 1 inch as strument face and unnecessary expense 6. By amending § 13.67(a) to read as stated in the notice. follows: and inconvenience due to instrument One commentator pointed out that the removal and teardown in order to record § 13.67 Final order of Hearing Officer. requirement that the proof tests of the the information on subsequent inspec­ static pressure systems on unpressurized tions. The requirement that the date and (a) If the final order of the Hearing aircraft be conducted with the static maximum altitude to which the altimeter Officer makes a decision on the merits, pressure system evacuated to a pressure has been tested be recorded on the al­ it contains a statement of his findings differential based on an altimeter read­ timeter, is necessary to provide the in­ and conclusions on all material issues of ing of 1,000 feet at sea level could be formation for entry in the airplane log fact and law. If the Hearing Officer confusing to people located at elevations or other permanent record when the in­ determines that safety in air commerce above 1,000 feet mean sea level. The FAA strument is installed in an airplane. or air transportation and the public in­ agrees and §§ 23.1325(b) (2) (i) and With the maximum altitude for the al­ terest so require, he may issue an order 25.1325(c) (2) (i) have been further timeter entered in the aircraft log, there

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100^-WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7586 RULES AND REGULATIONS Is no need, insofar as the pilot is con­ and operators without a corresponding in response to Notice 66-44 requesting cerned, to enter that data on the face increase in safety. the FAA to delete the phrase “in con­ of the instrument. Numerous comments were received trolled airspace” on the ground that a In connection with the altimeter test concerning the persons authorized to substantial number of IFR flights are and inspection, comments variously sug­ perform the tests and inspections of the made within uncontrolled airspace and gested the importance of preliminary static pressure system and the altimeter that there is no reason why the altimetry pitot system checks to preclude damage instrument. One comment suggested that maintenance and alteration standards to the airspeed meter, of periodic purg­ the designation should have included should not apply to IFR flight in both ing of pitot and static lines, and of in­ noncertificated repair stations and fixed controlled and uncontrolled airspace. formation concerning the accuracy of base operators. In this connection, it While this comment involves a sub­ altimeter test equipment. The FAA sees should be pointed out that the static stantive change to the present require­ merit in these comments, and contem­ pressure system and altimeter instru­ ments that goes beyond the scope of plates that to the extent that it has not ment tests and inspections are mainte­ this notice of proposed rule making, the already been accomplished, such infor­ nance items and must, therefore, be per­ FAA believes that it warrants further mation will be presented as acceptable formed by persons certificated to per­ consideration in connection with other means of compliance with the proposed form maintenance. Moreover, the tests altitude indication projects now in rules in appropriate advisory circulars. and inspections require sophisticated test process. One commentator suggested changes equipment and a capability that must be Interested persons have been afforded to section (c) of Appendix E to eliminate maintained under a system of periodic an opportunity to participate in the the requirement for commercial opera­ inspections.'It is only through the certi­ making of this amendment, and due con­ tors to prepare records under § 43.9 in fication procedures that the FAA is able sideration has been given to all matter addition to those they presently keep. to regularly conduct surveillance of the presented. Commercial operators of large aircraft approved facilities and make periodic In consideration of the foregoing, maintained in accordance with a con­ determinations as to their capability. Parts 23, 25, 43, and 91 of the Federal tinuous airworthiness program under Another comment suggested that a cer­ Aviation Regulations are amended Part 121 are exempted from the require­ tificated “A & P” mechanic should be effective August 1, 1967, as follows: ments of § 91.170 by the provisions of permitted to conduct the necessary tests § 91.161. Therefore, there is no need for and inspections. The FAA agrees with • PART 23— AIRWORTHINESS STAND­ the recommended change insofar as such this comment insofar as the static pres­ ARDS: NORMAL, UTILITY, AND operators are concerned. On the other sure system tests are concerned and the ACROBATIC CATEGORY AIR­ hand, commercial operators of small air­ regulation has been so revised. However, PLANES craft are governed by Part 135 of the the FAA does not consider that it would PARs and they are not required to main­ be appropriate to authorize certificated 1. Section 23.1325(b) (2) and (3) is tain their aircraft under a continuous mechanics to conduct the required altim­ amended to read as follows: airworthiness program. The provisions eter tests and inspections in the light of present § 43.9(a) apply to such opera­ of the test equipment and capability that § 23.1325 Static pressure system. tors and they would not, by the proposed is necessary for those tests and inspec­ ***** rule, be required to prepare records in tions. The opinion was also expressed (b) * * * addition to those they presently keep. that the proposal would permit certifi­ (2) A proof test must be conducted to The recommended change, is, therefore, cated repair stations with airframe rat­ demonstrate the integrity of the static unnecessary. ings to accomplish an instrument major pressure system in the following manner: Expressing the belief that the proposed repair without the necessity of obtaining (i) Unpressurized airplanes. Evacuate regulations would require periodic re­ an instrument rating. As proposed, the the static pressure system to a pressure moval of the altimeter instruments for rule permits a repair station having an differential of approximately 1 inch of the required tests and inspections, one airframe rating to conduct the tests and murcury or to a reading on the altimeter, comment indicated that extensive work inspections necessary for the altimeter 1,000 feet above the aircraft elevation behind the instrument panel can cause instrument. However, the rule does not at the time of the test. Without addi­ malfunctions of other equipment dis­ permit repair stations with only an air­ tional pumping for a period of 1 minute, turbed in the process. For this reason, frame rating to accomplish any repairs to the loss of indicated altitude must not the comment suggested that there should the instrument. Contrary to the under­ exceed 100 feet on the altimeter. be an amendment to allow airframe re­ standing of this commentator, the altim­ eter tests covered under this proposal are (ii) Pressurized airplanes. Evacuate pair stations to use external connections the static pressure system until a pres­ to test the static system and the altimeter not considered to be major repairs to the using a reference altimeter that is cali­ altimeter. Finally, the FAA does not con­ sure system until a pressure differential brated against a master semiannually. cur with the recommendation that the equivalent to the maximum cabin pres­ The FAA presently permits the use of provision designating the persons au­ sure differential for which the airplane external connections to test the static thorized to conduct the required inspec­ is type certificated is achieved. Without and altimeter systems. However, the ad­ tions and tests be deleted from § 91.170 additional pumping for a period of 1 visory circular covering this matter sug­ and added to Appendix E in Part 43. minute, the loss of indicated altitude gests that the reference altimeter be cali­ While it is true that Appendix E contains must not exceed 2 percent of the equiva­ brated once each month until the neces­ the scope of the required inspections and lent altitude of the maximum cabin dif­ sary interval between calibration checks tests that the designated persons are ferential pressure or lOjj^feet, whichever can be determined. Using this proce­ authorized to conduct, the FAA considers is greater. dure, it may be that the accuracy of the that from the standpoint of the owner (3) If a static pressure, system is pro­ reference altimeter can be maintained or operator of an airplane, it would be vided for any instrument, device, or sys­ by a semiannual calibration. better to set forth the designation in the tem required by the operating rules of The proposal has not been revised in operating requirements of Part 91 rather this chapter, each static pressure port accordance with the recommendation than as part of the technical details of must be designed or located in such a that altimeters and static systems be the inspections and tests in the Appen­ manner that the correlation between air tested and inspected once each year in­ dix to Part 43. pressure in the static pressure system stead of each 24 months. Based on cur­ The present requirements of § 91.170 and true ambient atmospheric static rent experience as reported by major apply only to persons operating an air­ pressure is not altered when the airplane altimeter manufacturers and repair sta­ plane in controlled airspace under IFR. encounters icing conditions. An anti­ tions, the FAA has determined that an The phrase “in controlled airspace,” icing means or an alternate source of altimeter instrument and static system which limits the applicability of § 91.170, static pressure may be used in showing will maintain accuracy and integrity for was incorporated into the regulation compliance with this requirement. If the 2 years following a test and inspection. after consideration by the Agency in an reading of the altimeter, when on the To require yearly tests of either or both appropriate rule-making action. How­ alternate static pressure system differs systems would impose a burden on owners ever, a comment has now been received from tiie reading of the altimeter when

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7587 on the primary static system by more Table I (c) No person may operate an air­ than 50 feet,-a correction card must be plane in controlled airspace under IFR provided for the alternate static sys­ Equivalent at an altitude above the maximum alti­ Altitude (feet) pressure Tolerance tude to which an altimeter of that air­ tem. (inches of =b(feet) mercury) plane has been tested. PART 25— AIRWORTHINESS STAND­ (Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, Federal Aviation Act ARDS: TRANSPORT CATEGORY —i,noo 31.018 20 of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423) o .._ ...... 29.921 20 AIRPLANES son 29.385 20 Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 16, 1,000 28.856 20 2. Section 25.1325(c) (2) is amended to i)soo...... 28.335 25 1967. 2,000 27.821 30 read as follows: a)nno ...... : 26.817 30 W illiam F. McKee, 4,000 ...... _ 25.842 35 Administrator. § 25.1325 Static pressure systems. 6,000 _ . 23.978 40 * * * * * 8,000 ... __ 22.225 60 [F.R. Doc. 67-5739; Filed, May 23, 1967; 10,000 ___ 20.577 80 8:46 a.m.] (C ) * * * 12,000...... 19.029 90 14)000-...... 17.677 100 (2) It is airtight except for the port16,000 16.216 110 into the atmosphere. A proof test must 18)000 ...... 14.942 120 [Airspace Docket No. 67-CE-15] be conducted to demonstrate the in­ 20)000 ...... 13.750 130 22,000. _ ...... __ ___ 12.636 140 PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL tegrity of the static pressure system in 25,000...... -...... 11.104 166 the following manner: 30,000...... 8.885 180 AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, 35,000 - . 7.041 205 (i) Unpressurized airplanes. Evacuate 40,000...... 5.538 230 AND REPORTING POINTS the static pressure system to a pressure 45,000 ...... 4.355 255 differential of approximately 1 inch of 50)000...... 3.425 280 Alteration of Transition Area mercury or to a reading on the altimeter, On March 7,1967, a notice of proposed 1,000 feet above the airplane elevation rule making was published in the F ederal at the time of the test. Without addi­ PART 91— g e n e r a l o p e r a t in g R egister (32 F.R. 3780) stating that the tional pumping for a period of 1 minute, AND FLIGHT RULES Federal Aviation Administration pro­ the loss of indicated altitude must not posed to alter controlled airspace in the exceed 100 feeton the altimeter. 4. Part 91 is amended as follows: Faribault-Owatonna, Minn., terminal (ii) Pressurized airplanes. Evacuate § 91.165 [Amended] area. the static pressure system until a pres­ Interested persons were afforded an sure differential equivalent to the maxi­ a. Section 91.165 is amended by in­ opportunity to participate in the rule mum cabin pressure differential for serting the words “and § 91.170” imme­ making through submission of com­ which the airplane is type certificated is diately after the reference “§ 91.169”. ments. The one comment received offered achieved. Without additional pumping b. Section 91.170 is amended to read no objection to the proposal. for a period of 1 minute, the loss of in­ as follows: In consideration of the foregoing, Part dicated altitude must not exceed 2 per­ § 91.170 Altimeter system tests and in­ 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is cent of the equivalent altitude of the spections. amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., July 20, maximum cabin differential pressure or 1967, as hereinafter set forth: 100 feet, whichever is greater. (a) No person may operate an air­ In § 71.181 (32 F.R. 2148), the Fari­ * * * * * plane in controlled airspace under IFR bault-Owatonna, Minn., transition area unless, within the preceding 24 calendar is amended to read: months, each static pressure system and PART 43— MAINTENANCE, PREVEN­ each altimeter instrument has been F aribault-O watonna, Min n . TIVE MAINTENANCE, REBUILDING, tested and inspected and found to com­ That airspace extending upward from 700 AND ALTERATION ply with Appendix E of Part 43 of this feet above the surface within a 5-mile radius chapter. The static pressure system and of Faribault Municipal Airport (latitude 44°- 3. Appendix E of Part 43 is amendedaltimeter instrument tests and inspec­ 19'35" N., longitude 93°18'30'' W.); within as follows: tions may be conducted by— a 5-mile radius of Owatonna Municipal Air­ port (latitude 44°07'15'' N., longitude 93° 15'- a. The second sentence of subpara­ (1) The manufacturer of the airplane 15" W.); within 2 miles each side of the 200° graph (ii) of paragraph (b) (1) is on which the tests and inspections are bearing from Faribault Municipal Airport ex­ to be performed; amended to read as follows: tending from the Faribault 5-mile radius (2) A certificated repair station prop­ area to 9 miles south of the airport; and (b) Altimeter: erly equipped to perform these functions within 2 miles each side of the 315° bearing (1) * * * and holding— from Owatonna Municipal Airport, extending (ii) Hysteresis. * * * Pressure shall be (i) An instrument rating, Class I; from the Owatonna 5-mile radius area to 9 increased at a rate simulating a descent in (ii) A limited instrument rating ap­ miles northwest of the airport; and that air­ altitude at the rate of 5,000 to 20,000 feet space extending upward from 1,200 feet above per minute until within 3,000 feet of the propriate to the make and model altim­ the surface in the Faribault-Owatonna ter­ first test point (50 percent of maximum al­ eter to be tested; minal area bounded on the north by the arc titude) . * * * (iii) A limited rating appropriate to of a 36-mile radius circle centered on the ***** the test to be performed; Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (iv) An airframe rating appropriate (latitude 44°53'08" N., longitude 93°13'11" b. Section (c) is amended to read as to the airplane to be tested; or W.), on the east by V-82, on the south by follows: (v) A limited rating for a manufac­ V—24 and on the west by V-170, excluding (c) Records: Comply with the provisions turer issued for the altimeter in accord­ the portion which overlies the Hope, Minn., of § 43.9 of this chapter as to content, form, ance with § 145.101(b) (4) of this chap­ and Rochester, Minn., transition areas. and disposition of the records. The person ter; or (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; performing the altimeter tests shall record on (3) A certificated mechanic with an 49 U.S.C. 1348) the altimeter the date and maximum alti­ airframe rating (static pressine system tude to which the altimeter has been tested tests and inspections only). Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on May 8, and the persons approving the airplane for (b) The first test and inspection re­ 1967. return to service shall enter that data in the Edward C. Marsh, airplane log or other permanent record. quired by this section for airplanes, under annual inspection is not required Director, Central Region. c. Table I is amended to read as fol­ to be made until the first annual inspec­ [F.R. Doc. 67-5740; Filed, May 23, 1967; lows: tion after July 31, 1967. 8:46 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7588 RULES AND REGULATIONS [Airspace Docket No. 67—CE-23] In consideration of the foregoing, Part [Airspace Docket No. 66-WE-52] 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL amended, effective immediately, as here­ PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, inafter set forth. AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND REPORTING POINTS In § 71.181 (32 F.R. 2148) the Eufaula, AND REPORTING POINTS Ala., transition area is amended as fol­ Alteration of Transition Area lows: “* * * (latitude 31°56'45" N., Alteration of Federal Airways On March 10, 1967, a notice of pro­ longitude 85°08'15" W.) * * *” is deleted posed rule making was published in the and “* * * (latitude 31°57'05" N., On March 1,1967, a notice of proposed rule making was published in the F ed­ F ederal R egister (32 F.R. 3947) stating longitude 85°07'45" W.) * * *” is sub­ stituted therefor. eral R egister (32 F.R. 3401) stating that that the Federal Aviation Administra­ the Federal Aviation Agency was consid­ tion proposed to alter controlled airspace (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; ering raising the floors of Federal airway in the Coldwater, Mich., terminal area. 49 U.S.C. 1348(a) ) Interested persons were afforded an segments in the Seattle, Wash., ARTC opportunity to participate in the rule Issued in East Point, Ga., on May 15, Center area. making through submission of com­ 1967. Interested persons were afforded an J ames G. R ogers, opportunity to participate in the pro­ ments. The one comment received was posed rule making by the submission of favorable. Director, Southern Region. The Coldwater, Mich., Branch County [FJEt. Doc. 67-5742; FUed, May 23, 1967; comments. All comments received were Memorial Airport coordinates recited in 8:46 a.m.] favorable. the notice of proposed rule making have Subsequent to publication of the no­ been changed slightly in this final rule. [Airspace Docket No. 67-CE-51] tice, V-440 was designated from Seattle Since this change is minor in nature and to Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. imposes no additional burden on anyone, PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL A floor for this airway is considered it is being incorporated in the rule with­ AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, herein. V-99 was renumbered as seg­ out notice and public procedure. AND REPORTING POINTS ments of V-165 and V-287; V-281 was In consideration of the foregoing, Part renumbered as a segment of V-536; and 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is Alteration of Federal Airway V-283 was renumbered as a segment of V-165 (Airspace Docket No. 66-WA-42, amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., July 20, The purpose of this amendment to 1967, as hereinafter set forth: 32 F.R. 6434) effective June 22, 1967. Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ In as much as the floors proposed for In § 71.181 (32 F.R. 2148), the Cold- tions is to alter the segment of VOR Fed­ water, Mich., transition area is amended V-99, V-281, V-283, and V-287 were in­ eral airway No. 218 between Rochester, corporated in Airspace Docket No. 66- to read: Minn., and Rockford, 111. Coldwater, Mic h . WA-42, action on these floors is not V-218 airway from Rochester, Minn., considered herein. A proposed floor for That airspace extending upward from 700 to Waukon, Iowa, is a common segment V-520 is not considered herein as action feet above the surface within a 5-mile radius with VOR Federal airway No. 24 south of Branch Comity, Memorial Airport (lati­ to realign and extend this airway to tude 41°56'05" N., longitude 85°02'55" W.), alternate. Action is taken herein to raise The Dalles has been postponed until within 2 miles each side of the Litchfield, the floor of this segment of V-218 to August 17, 1967 (Airspace Docket No. Mich. VORTAC 239° radial extending from 1,200 feet AGL so as to provide compat- 66-WE-70). the 5-mile radius area to 8 miles northeast ability on the floors for this common air­ of the airport, and within 2 miles each side way segment. In addition, action is taken In addition, several changes differing of the 209° bearing from the Branch County herein to realign V-218 segment be­ from those proposed in the notice are in­ Memorial Airport extending from the 5-mile tween Waukon and Rockford via the in­ corporated herein for aeronautical chart radius area to 8 miles southwest of the tersection of the Waukon 119° T (114* legibility and to include airspace in which airport. M) and the Rockord 304° T (301° M) radar vectoring is currently accom­ (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; radials. This realignment of V-218 will plished. Since these changes are, in each 49 UJS.C. 1348) permit the deletion of the Rewey, Wis., case, minor changes in distance and alti­ VOR as a facility within the VOR airway tudes of floors and are made in the in­ Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on May 10, terest of safety, the Administrator has 1967. structure and also permit its decommis­ D aniel E. Barrow, sioning. Since this realignment of V-218 determined that notice and public pro­ Acting Director, Central Region. will not alter the extent of controlled air­ cedure thereon are impracticable. space, notice and public procedure are In consideration of the foregoing, Part [F.R. Doc. 67-5741; Filed, May 23, 1967; 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is 8:46 am .] unnecessary. However, since it is neces­ sary that sufficient time be allowed to amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., July 20, permit appropriate changes to be made 1967, as hereinafter set forth. [Airspace Docket No. 67—SO—56] on aeronautical charts, these amend­ 1. Section 71.123 (32 F.R. 2009, 3219, 3438, 5988) is’ amended as follows: PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL ments will become effective more than 30 days after publication. a. In V-2 all before “12 AGL Spokane, AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, In consideration of the foregoing, Part Wash.,” is deleted and “From Seattle, AND REPORTING POINTS 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is Wash., 12 AGL Ellensburg, Wash., in­ Alteration of Transition Area amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., July 20, cluding a 12 AGL south alternate via INT 1967 as hereinafter set forth. Seattle 124° and Ellensburg 274° radials; The purpose of this amendment to In § 71.123 (32 F.R. 2009) V-218 is 12 AGL Ephrata, Wash., including a 12 Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regu­ amended by deleting all before “12 AGL AGL north alternate from Seattle to lations is to alter the Eufaula, Ala., tran­ INT Rockford 136°” and substituting Ephrata via Wenatchee, Wash.;” is sub­ sition area. “From Rochester, Minn., 12 AGL via stituted therefor. The Eufaula transition area is de­ Waukon, Iowa; 12 AGL INT Waukon b. In V-4 all before “12 AGL Pendle­ scribed in § 71.181 (32 F.R. 2148). 119° and Rockford, HI., 304° radials; 12 ton, Oreg.;” is deleted and “From Neah The geographic coordinate for the AGL Rockford;” therefor. Bay, Wash., RBN, 12 AGL Port Angeles, Weedon Airport is published as “* * * (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; Wash.; 12 AGL INT Port Angeles 090* (latitude 31°56'45" N., longitude 85°08'- 49 U.S.C. 1348) and Seattle, Wash., 329° radials; 12 AGL 15" W.) * * Seattle; 12 AGL Yakima, Wash., includ­ Because of a refinement of the geo­ Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 16, ing a 12 AGL south alternate from Se­ graphic coordinate by Coast and Geodetic 1967. attle to Yakima via INT Seattle 163° and Survey, it is necessary to alter the tran­ . H. B. H elstrom, Olympia, Wash., 084° radials and INT sition area accordingly. Chief, Airspace and Air Olympia. 084° and Yakima 305° radials, Traffic Rules Division. excluding the airspace between the main Since this amendment is editorial in onrl fW c olfornafA fllfWAV!99 ÍS Substitute Cl nature, notice and public procedure here­ [F.R. Doc. 67-5743; Filed,- May 23, 1967; on are unnecessary. 8:46 ajn.] therefor.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7589

c. In V-23 all after “12 AGL Red V-182 Prom Portland, Oreg., 12 AGL The tion was revoked (Airspace Docket No. Bluff;” Is deleted and “58 miles, 12 AGL, Dalles, Oreg.; 12 AGL Baker, Oreg. 66-WA-4I, 32 P.R. 6435). Accordingly, 95 MSL Port Jones, Calif.; 12 AGL Med­ j. V-204 is amended to read as follows: no action is taken on this airway seg­ ment. ford, Oreg., including a 12 AGL east al­ V-204 Prom Hoquiam, Wash., 12 AGL ternate via INT Port Jones 042* and Olympia, Wash. In consideration of the foregoing, Part Medford 157° radials and also a 12 AGL 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations west alternate via INT Port Jones 340* k. V-287 is amended to read as follows: is amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., July 20, and Medford 235® radials, excluding the V-287 Prom North Bend, Oreg., 12 AGL 1967, as hereinafter set forth. airspace between the main and these Newberg, Oreg., Including a 12 AGL west al­ 1. Section 71.123 (32 F.R. 2009* 3219) alternate airways; 12 AGL Eugene, Oreg., ternate from North Bend to Newberg via is amended as follows: including a 12 AGL west alternate from Newport, Oreg.; excluding the airspace be­ a. In V-4 “12 AGL Marshall, Mo.;” is Medford to Eugene via Roseburg, Oreg., tween the main and this west alternate; 12 deleted. and INT Roseburg 003° and Eugene 187® AGL Portland, Oreg., including a 12 AGL b. In V-12 all between “12 AGL Blue east alternate via INT Newberg 069° and radials; 12 AGL Portland, Oreg., includ­ Portland 196° radials; 20 miles, 12 AGL, 51 Springs;” and “12 AGL Troy, HI.;” is ing a 12 AGL east alternate and also a miles, 45 MSL, 12 AGL Olympia, Wash.; 12 deleted and “12 AGL Columbia, Mo.; 12 12 AGL west alternate from Eugene to AGL INT Olympia 010° and Seattle, Wash., AGL Maryland Heights, Mo.;” is substi­ Portland via Corvallis, Oreg., INT Cor­ 329° radials; 12 AGL INT Seattle 329° and tuted therefor. vallis 352° and Newberg, Oreg., 204® ra­ Port Angeles, Wash., 090° radials; 12 AGL c. V-424 is amended to read as follows: dials and Newberg; 20 miles, 12 AGL, 45 Port Angeles, 12 AGL Neah Bay, Wash., RBN. V-424 Prom Blue Springs, Mo., 12 AGL MSL INT Portland 350° and Seattle, The airspace within Canada is excluded. INT Blue Springs 077“ and Macon, Mo., 236“ Wash., 197° radials; 21 miles, 45 MSL, l. V-448 is amended to read as follows: radials; 12 AGL Maoon. 12 ÀGL Seattle; 12 AGL Paine, Wash.; 12 AGL Bellingham, Wash.; 12 AGL via V-448 Prom Portland, Oreg., 12 AGL 2. In § 71.203 (32 FJt. 2275) “Reads- Yakima, Wash., including a 12 AGL south ville, Mo.” is deleted and “Columbia, INT Bellingham 290° radial to the United alternate; 12 AGL Ephrata, Wash. States/Canadian border.” is substituted Mo.” is added. therefor. m. V-497 is amended to read as fol­ (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; d. In V-25 all between “12 AGL Red lows: 49 U .S.0.1348) Bluff, Calif.;” and “12 AGL INT Yakima V-497 Prom John Day, Oreg., 49 miles, Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 16, 305°” is deleted and “53 miles, 12 AGL, 65 MSL, 12 AGL The Dalles, Oreg. 1967. 95 MSL INT Red Bluff 015° and Klamath n. V-500 is amended to read as follows: H. B. Helstrom, Palls, Oreg., 181° radials; 19 miles, 95 Chief, Airspace and Air MSL, 12 AGL Klamath Falls; 21 miles, V-500 Prom Portland, Oreg., 12 AGL New­ berg, Oreg.; 41 miles, 12 AGL, 70 MSL John Traffic Rules Division. 12 AGL, 77 miles, 90 MSL, 12 AGL Red­ Day, Oreg.; 30 miles, 12 AGL, 71 miles, 105 [P.R. Doc. 67-5746; FUed, May 23, 1967; mond, Oreg.; 12 AGL The Dalles, Oreg.; MSL, 12 AGL Boise, Idaho. 8:46 a.m.] 12 AGL Yakima, Wash., including a 12 AGL east alternate via INT The Dalles 2. Section 71.125 (32 F.R. 2058) is [ Airspace Docket No. 67-SO-38] 032° and Yakima 183° radials;” is sub­ amended as follows: in V-440 all before stituted therefor. “Victoria,” is deleted and “From Seattle, PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL e. In V-27 all between “12 AGL For­ Wash., 12 AGL” is substituted therefor. AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, tuna, Calif.;” and “The airspace below (Secs. 307(a), 1110, Federal Aviation Act of AND REPORTING POINTS 2,000 feet MSL” is deleted and “12 AGL 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348, 1510) ; Executive Order Crescent City, Calif.; 31 miles, 12 AGL, 10854 (24 F it. 9565) ) Designation of Control Zone and 32 miles, 59 MSL, 12 AGL North Bend, Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 16, Alteration of Transition Area Oreg.; 12 AGL Newport, Oreg.; 39 miles, 1967. On April 14,1967, a notice of proposed 12 AGL, 30 miles, 45 MSL, 12 AGL As­ H. B. H elstrom, toria, Oreg.; 30 miles, 12 AGL, 17 miles, rule making was published in the F ed­ Chief, Airspace and Air eral R egister (32 F.R. 5998) stating that 45 MSL, 12 AGL Olympia, Wash.; 12 Traffic Rules Division. AGL INT Olympia 010* and Seattle, the Federal Aviation Administration was Wash., 249° radials; 12 AGL Seattle, in­ [F.R. Doc. 67-5744; Filed, May 23, 1967; considering amendments to Part 71 of cluding a 12 AGL west alternate from 8:46 a.m.] the Federal Aviation Regulations that Astoria to INT Olympia 010° and Seattle would designate the Miami, Fla. (new 249° radials via Hoquiam, Wash., exclud­ [Airspace Docket No. 67-CE-4] Tamiami Airport) part-time control ing the airspace between the main and zone and alter the Miami, Fla., 700-foot this west alternate.” is substituted PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL transition area. therefor. AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, Interested persons were afforded an AND REPORTING POINTS opportunity to participate in the rule f. In V-112 all before “Spokane, making through the submission of com­ Wash.,” is deleted and “From Astoria, ments. All comments received were Oreg., 44 miles, 12 AGL; 15 miles, 6-mile Alteration of Federal Airways and Designation and Revocation of Re­ favorable. wide, 12 AGL Portland, Oreg.; 12 AGL In consideration of the foregoing, Part The Dalles, Oreg.; 12 AGL INT The porting Points 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Dalles 096° and Pendleton, Oreg., 254* On March 4,1967, a notice of proposed is amended, effective 0001 e.d.s.t., July 1, radials; 12 AGL Pendleton; 53 miles, 12 1967, as hereinafter set forth. AGL, 28 miles, 45 MSL, 12 AGL” is sub­ rule making was published in the F ederal R egister . (32 F.R. 3750) stating that the In § 71.171 (32 F.R. 2071) the follow­ stituted therefor. ing control zone is added: g. V-121 is amended to read as follows : Federal Aviation Agency was consider­ ing altering V-4, V-210, V-424, and V-12; Miam i, F la. (New T amiami Airport) V-121 Prom Medford, Oreg., 12 AGL INT revoking the Readsville, Mo., VOR as a Within a 5-mile radius of the new Tamiami Medford 352° and Roseburg, Oreg., 127° ra­ designated low altitude reporting point; Airport, 51a. (latitude 25“38'49" N., longi­ tals; 12 AGL Roseburg; 12 AGL North Bend, and designating the Columbia, Mo., VOR tude 80°25'59" W.). This control zone is Oreg.; 12 AGL Eugene, Oreg. as a low altitude reporting point. It was effective during the specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. h. V-122 is amended to read as follows: also proposed to retain the 1,200-foot AGL floors on the airways. The effective date and time will thereafter v~122 Prom Crescent City, Calif., 12 AGL Interested persons were afforded an be continuously published in the Airman’s rv^ford’ 0re8,5 22 miles, 12 AGL, 75 MSL opportunity to participate in the pro­ Information Manual. INT Medford 117° and Klamath Palls, Oreg., posed rule making through the submis­ In § 71.181 (32 F.R. 2148) the Miami, £82 True radials; 6 miles, 75 MSL, 12 AGL Fla., 700-foot transition area (32 F.R. Klamath Palls; 21 miles, 12 AGL, 90 MSL sion of comments. All comments received Lakeview, Oreg. were favorable. 3766) is amended to read: Subsequent to publicaion of the notice, That airspace extending upward from 700 i. V-182 is amended to read as follows: the segment of V-210 under considera­ feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 No. 100-----5 7590 RULES AND REGULATIONS of Miami International Airport (latitude 25 °- southeast of the airport; and that airspace mente. Thé one comment received was 47'35" N., longitude 80°17'10" W.); within 5 extending upward from 1,200 feet above the favorable. miles south and 8 miles north of the Miami surface within 5 miles southwest and 8 miles Runway 9—L ILS localizer west course, ex­ northeast of the 115* bearing from Denison In consideration of the foregoing, Part tending from the airport to 12 miles west of Municipal Airport, extending from' the air­ 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is the Runway 9-L ILS LOM; within 5 miles port to 12 miles southeast of the airport. amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., July 20, north and 8 miles south of the Miami Run­ 1967, as hereinafter set forth : way 27—L ILS localizer east course, extending (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; 49 In § 71.181 (32 F.R. 2148), the follow­ from the airport to 12 miles east of the Run­ U.S.C. 1348) ing transition areas are amended to read : way 27—L ILS LOM; within 5 miles south and Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on May 10, Green Bay, Wis . 8 miles north of the Runway 9—L ILS localizer 1967. east course, extending from the airport to 12 D aniel E. B arrow, That airspace extending upward from 700 miles east of the I NT of Runway 9-L ILS lo­ feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius calizer east course and the Biscayne Bay VOR Acting Director, Central Region. of Austin-Straubel Airport, Green Bay, Wis. 351° radial; within 2 miles each side of the [F.R. Doc. 67-5748; Filed, May 23, 1967; (latitude 44°29'15" N., longitude 88°07'45" Miami VORTAC 139° radial, extending from 8:47 a.m.] W.); within 2 miles each side of the Green the 7-mile radius area to the VORTAC; with­ Bay VORTAC 326° radial, extending from the in a 4-mile radius of the old Tamiami Air­ 6-mile radius area to 8 miles northwest of port, Fla. (latitude 25°46'15" N., longitude [Airspace Docket No. 67-SO-35] the VORTAC; and within 2 miles each side 80°22'35'' W.) ; within an 8-mile radius of of the Green Bay ILS localizer southwest the new Tamiami Airport, Fla. (latitude 25°- PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL and northeast courses, extending from 11 38'49" N„ longitude 80°25'59" W.) ; within a AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, miles southwest to 21 miles northeast of the 6-mile radius of the Opa Locka Airport, Fla. AND REPORTING POINTS OM. (latitude 25°54'25" N„ longitude 80*16'40" Oshkosh, Wis . W.) ; within 2 miles each side of the Miami Designation of Transition Area VORTAC 108° radial, extending from the 6- That airspace extending upward from 700 On April 7, 1967, a notice of proposed feet above the surface within an 8-mile mile radius area to the VORTAC; within a 5- radius of Winnebago County Airport, mile radius of the North Perry Airport, Fla. rule making was published in the F ederal Oshkosh, Wis. (latitude 43°59'20” N., longi­ (latitude 26°00'06" N„ longitude 80°14'24" R egister (32 F.R. 5706) stating that the tude 88°33'15" W.); within 8 miles east and W.) ; within a 7-mile radius of Fort Lauder­ Federal Aviation Administration was 5 miles west of the Oshkosh VOR 176° dale-Hollywood International Airport (lati­ considering an amendment to Part 71 of tude 26°04'2ô" N., longitude 80°09'10" W.); radial, extending from the 8-mile radius area within 2 miles each side of the 315° bearing the Federal Aviation Regulations that to 12 miles south of the VOR; within a 5- from the Fort Lauderdale RBN, extending would designate the Gainesville, Ga., mile radius of Fond du Lac County Airport, from the 7-mile radius area to 8 miles north­ transition area. Fond du Lac, Wis. (latitude 43°46'10" N„ Interested persons were afforded an longitude 88°29'30" W.); and within 5 miles west of the RBN; within a 7-mile radius of south and 8 miles north of the 273° bearing Homestead AFB (latitude 25°29'15" N„ longi­ opportunity to participate in the rule from Fond du Lac County Airport, extending tude 80°23'10" W.); within 2 miles each side making through the submission of com­ from the airport to 12 miles west of the air­ of the Homestead ILS localizer northeast ments. All comments received were port; and that airspace extending upward course, extending from the 7-mile radius area favorable. from 1,200 feet above the surface bounded by to 9 miles northeast of Homestead AFB; In consideration of the foregoing, Part a line beginning at latitude 44°36'00" N„ (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is longitude 87°47'15" W.; thence to latitude 49 U.S.C. 1348(a)) amended, effective 0001 e.d.s.t., July 20, 44°36'00" N„ longitude 87°27'00" W.; thence to latitude 43°30'00" N„ longitude 87°27'00" Issued in East Point, Ga., on May 15, 1967, as hereinafter set forth. W.; thence to latitude 43°30'00" N., longitude 1967. In § 71.181 (32 F.R. 2148) the follow­ 88°30'00" W.; thence to latitude 43°40'40" N„ J ames G. R ogers, ing transition area is added: longitude 89°38'20" W.; thence north along Director, Southern Region. Gainesville, Ga. the east boundary of V-255 to latitude 44°19'50" N„ longitude 89°29'00" W.; thence [F.R. Doc. 67-5747; Filed, May 23, 1967; That airspace extending upward from 700 counterclockwise via the arc of a 15-mile 8:46 a.m.] feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius radius circle centered on the Stevens Point, of the Gainesville Municipal Airport (lati­ Wis., VOR to latitude 44°28'30" N., longitude tude 34°16'23" N., longitude 83°49'45" W.); 89°14'25" W.; thence to latitude 44°29'25" N., [Airspace Docket No. 67-CE-20] within 2 miles each side of the 216° bearing longitude 88°35'00" W.; thence clockwise via from the Gainesville, Ga., RBN (latitude 34*- PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL the arc of a 20-mile radius circle centered on 16'29.99" N., longitude 83°49'55.58” W.), ex­ the Green Bay VOR to the point of begin­ AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, tending from the 6-mile radius area to 8 ning, excluding the portion which overlies AND REPORTING POINTS miles southwest of the RBN. the Cecil, Wis., transition area. (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; Designation of Transition Area 49 U.S.C. 1348(a)) 49 U.S.C. 1348) On March 10,1967, a notice of proposed Issued in East Point, Ga., on May 15, Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on May 8, rule making was published in the F ed­ 1967. 1967. eral R egister (32 F.R. 3946) stating that James G. R ogers, Edward C. Marsh, the Federal Aviation Administration pro­ Director, Southern Region. Director, Central Region. posed to designate controlled airspace in [F.R. Doc. 67-5749; Filed, May 23, 1967; [F.R. Doc. 67-5750; Filed, May 23, 1967; the Denison, Iowa, terminal area. 8:47 a.m.] ‘8:47 a.m.] Interested persons were afforded an opportunity to participate in the rule making through submission of com­ [Airspace Docket No. 67-CE-13] [ Airspace Docket No. 66-EA-51] ments. The one comment received was PART 71— designation o f fed er a l PART 71— designation o f federal favorable. AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, In consideration of the foregoing, Part AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is AND REPORTING POINTS AND REPORTING POINTS amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., July 20, Alteration of Transition Areas 1967, as hereinafter set forth; PART 75— ESTABLISHMENT OF In § 71.181 (32 F.R. 2148), the following On March 11, 1967,. a notice of pro­ JET ROUTES transition area is added: posed rule making was published in the F ederal R egister (32 F.R. 3997) stating Alteration of Federal Airway and Denison, I owa that the Federal Aviation Administra­ Designation of Jet Routes That airspace extending upward from 700 tion proposed to alter controlled airspace feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius in the Green Bay, Wis., and Oshkosh, On February 24, 1967, a notice of pro­ of the Denison, Iowa, Municipal Airport Wis., terminal areas. posed rule making was published in the (latitude 41*59'15" N., longitude 95°23'0O" F ederal R egister (32 F.R. 3228) stating W .) and within 2 miles each side of the 115° Interested persons were afforded an bearing from Denison Municipal Airport, ex­ opportunity to participate in the rule that the Federal Aviation Agency was tending from the 6-mile radius area to 8 miles making through submission of com- considering extension of VOR Federal

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7591

airway No. 128 from Charleston, W. Va„ carriers; (2) a considerable growth in 1. Amend section 04, by dividing the to Casanova, Va., and designation of a operating revehues alone is not a sound supplemental air carriers into Group I new jet route between Charleston, W. Va., basis, for imposing additional reporting and Group n , and by otherwise revising and Herndon, Va. requirements; and (3) the proposed ef­ the list of certificated carriers to read: Interested persons were afforded an fective date of January I, 1967, is un­ opportunity to participate in the rule realistic and cannot be complied with. Section 04 . Air Carrier Groupings and making through the submission of Initially, we must disagree with the Standard Name Abbreviations comments. All comments received were assertion that a considerable increase in favorable. operating revenue alone is not a sound Group I Route Air Carriers In consideration of the foregoing, basis for imposing additional reporting Name Abbreviation Parts 71 and 75 of the Federal Aviation requirements. Operating revenue indi­ Aerovías Sud Americana, Aerovías. Regulations are amended, effective 0001 cates the scope of operations and ac­ Inc. e.s.t., July 20, 1967, as hereinafter set counting capability, which were the orig­ Alaska Coastal Airlines, Alaska Coastal. forth. inal bases for classifying the route Inc. 1. Section” 71.123 (32 F.R. 2009) is carriers into three accounting groups. Aspen Airways, Inc. Aspen. amended as follows: In V-128 “12 AGL The supplemental carriers were assigned Caribbean-Atlantic Air­ Caribair. Charleston, W. Va.” is deleted and “12 to Group I because their revenues were lines, Inc. Chicago Helicopter Air­ Chicago Helicop­ AGL Charleston, W. Va.; 12 AGL Cas­ comparable to those of the smallest car­ ways, Inc. ter. anova, Va.” is substituted therefor. riers. In fiscal 1966, however, Saturn Cordova Airlines, Inc. Cordova. 2. Section 75.100 (32 F.R. 2341) is received over $14 million and Universal Kodiak Airways, Inc. Kodiak. amended by adding: received over $16 million in revenues Los Angeles Airways, Inc. LA Airways. from the Military Airlift Command New York Airways, Inc. NY Airways. J et Route No. 142 (Charleston, W. Va., to Northern Consolidated Herndon, Va.) (MAC) alone; fiscal 1967 MAC revenues Northern Consol. are expected to be even greater. There is Airlines, Inc. Prom Charleston, W. Va., via INT of Reeve Aleutian Airways, Reeve. Charleston 083° and Herndon, Va., 254* no doubt that these MAC contractors Inc. radials; to Herndon. can no longer be classified among the San Francisco & Oakland SFO Helicopter. “smallest” air carriers. The simplified Helicopter Airlines, Inc. (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; accounts especially designed for small Western Alaska Airlines, Western Alaska. 49 U.S.C. 1348) operations and revenues are no longer Inc. Wien Alaska Airlines, Inc. Wien. Issued in Washington, D.C., on May adequate for reporting the operating 16,1967. results of these carriers. Group II R oute Air Carriers We must also reject the assertion that H. B. Helstrom, Airlift Internationial, Inc. Chief, Airspace and Air the additional information will not as­ Airlift. sist the Board in its rate-making func­ Allegheny Airlines, Inc. Allegheny. Traffic Rules Division. Aloha Airlines, Inc. Aloha. tion. The Board has assumed the Bonanza Air Lines, Inc. Bonanza. [F.R. Doc. 67-5745; Filed, May 23, 1967; responsibility of fixing minimum rates Central Airlines, Inc. 8:46 a.m j Central. for MAC charter services in order to Frontier Airlines, Inc. Frontier. stabilize this highly competitive market. Lake Central Airlines, Inc. Lake Central. The Board accordingly has a duty to be North Central Airlines, North Central. Chapter II— Civil Aeronautics Board informed of current cost levels and rates Inc. Ozark Air Lines, Inc. SUBCHAPTER A— ECONOMIC REGULATIONS of return so that it will be in a position Ozark. Pacific Air Lines, Inc. Pacific. [Reg. ER-492] to adjust rates if conditions and yields Southern Airways, Inc. Southern. should change rapidly. The supplemental Trans Caribbean Airways, Trans Oar. PART 241— UNIFORM SYSTEM OF carriers have an important segment of Inc. ACCOUNTS AND REPORTS FOR the MAC market, and their refined cost Trans-Texas Airways, Inc. Trans-Texas. CERTIFICATED AIR CARRIERS data are necessary for a true picture of West Coast Airlines, Inc. West Coast. MAC costs. It is true that the additional Group i n Route Ant Carriers Group II Classification for Supple­ data reported on schedules P-6 and P-7 mental Air Carriers will not be the basis for a rate review. Alaska Airlines, Inc. Alaska. These data, however, will permit a con­ American Airlines, Inc. American. Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics tinuing evaluation of system costs in re­ Braniff Airways, Inc. Braniff. Board at its office in Washington, D.C., Continental Air Lines, Continental. on the 5th day of May 1967. lation to those of other MAC contrac­ Inc. In EDR-107 (Docket 18064), dated tors, and are essential to a proper Delta Air Lines, Inc. Delta. December 23, 1966, and published at 31 analysis of the allocations of such costs to Eastern Air Lines, Inc. Eastern. MAC services. The Flying Tiger Line, Flying Tiger. P.R. 16626, the Board gave notice that it We have decided to adopt the regula­ Inc. had under consideration an amendment tion substantially as proposed except for Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. Hawaiian. to Part 241 which would reclassify nine the effective date. Therefore, the tenta­ Mohawk Airlines, Inc. Mohawk. supplemental air carriers from the Group tive findings set forth in the explanatory National Airlines, Inc. National. I category to the Group n category for Northeast Airlines, Inc. Northeast. accounting and reporting purposes. The statement to the proposed rule (EDR- Northwest Airlines, Inc. Northwest. 107, supra) are incorporated herein by Pacific Northern Airlines, Pacific Northern. proposal was based on the fact that op­ reference and finalized. Although it Inc. erating revenues of these supplemental would be advantageous to have the de­ Pan American World Air­ Pan American. carriers are now comparable to those of tailed expense data for the full calendar ways, Inc. the Group n route air carriers, owing year, we recognize that a retroactive date Piedmont Aviation, Inc. Piedmont. largely to charter services performed Seaboard World Airlines, Seaboard. under contracts with the Military Airlift of'January 1, 1967, would impose an ad­ Inc. Command (MAC). ditional accounting burden during the Slick Corp. Slick. Only two air carriers, Saturn Airways, peak accounting season. The rule will be Trans World Airlines, Trans World. Inc., and Universal Airlines, Inc.,1 sub­ made effective July 1, 1967, to coincide Inc. with the beginning of the MAC contract United Air Lines, Inc. United. mitted comments on the proposal. Both Western Air Lines, Inc. Western. carriers objected to the reclassification, year, thus allowing adequate time for the asserting that: (1) The additional re­ reclassified carriers to modify their ac­ Group I Supplemental Air Carriers counting systems and develop allocation porting requirements are unwarranted procedures. Johnson Flying Service, Johnson. and will impose a costly and time-con­ Inc. suming burden upon the reclassified In consideration of the foregoing, the Purdue Aeronautics Corp. Purdue. Board hereby amends Part 241 of the Standard Airways, Inc. Standard. Economic Regulations (14 CFR Part Vance International Air- Vance, 1 Formerly Zan.top Air Transport, Inc. 241), effective July 1, 1967, as follows: ways, Inc.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7592 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Group H Supplemental Air Carriers Capital International Airways, Inc. maintenance, equipment modification, American Flyers Airline American Flyers. Johnson Flying Service, Inc. personnel training, etc. Corp. Modern Air Transport, Inc. (d) The sum of the subdivisions of Capitol International Air­ Capitol. Overseas National Airways, Inc. Purdue Aeronautics Corp. each objective account reported in this ways, Inc. Saturn Airways, Inc. schedule shall agree with the correspond­ Modern Air Transport, Modern. ing amounts reported in schedule P-1— Inc. Southern Air Transport, Inc. Overseas National Air­ Overseas Standard Airways, Inc. Income Statement. ways, Inc. National. Trans International Airlines Corp. C. Amend the title and paragraphs (a) Saturn Airways, Inc. Saturn. Universal Airlines, Inc. and (i) of schedule P-5.1 to read: Southern Air Transport, Southern Air Vance International Airways, Inc. World Airways, Inc. Schedules P-5.1 and P-5.2—Aircraft Inc. Transp. Operating Expenses Trans International Air­ Trans Interna­ 3. Amend section 32 by inserting lines Corp. tional. schedules B-10, P-1.2, P-4, P-5.2, and (a) Schedule P-5.1 shall be filed by Universal Airlines, Inc. Universal. each Group I supplemental air carrier World Airways, Inc. World. P-7 in the list of schedules in paragraph and schedule P-5.2 shall be filed by each -2. Amended paragraph (h) of section (a) and by revising paragraph (b), to Group II supplemental air carrier. 31 by revising the list of supplemental read as follows: * * * * * air carriers to read: . Section 32— General Reporting

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7593 (d) The total of each functional ex­ levels. The Commodity Exchange Au­ pense classification reported in this Title 17— COMMODITY AND thority must adopt electronic data proc­ schedule shall agree with the correspond­ essing equipment and techniques to cope ing amount reported on schedule P-1. SECURITIES EXCHANGES with this volume of trading and enable (Secs. 204(a), 407, Federal Aviation Act of the Authority properly to enforce pro­ 1958, as amended, 72 Stat. 743, 766; 49 U.S.C. Chapter I— Commodity Exchange Au­ visions of the Commodity Exchange Act. 1324,1377) thority (Including Commodity Ex­ In order for electronic data processing Note: The reporting requirements con­ change Commission), Department to be effectively used by the Authority, it is necessary that members of contract tained herein have been approved by the of Agriculture Bureau of the Budget in accordance with the markets and the contract markets them­ Federal Reports Act of 1942. PART 1— GENERAL REGULATIONS selves maintain more uniform and more UNDER THE COMMODITY EX­ centrally available records. The revisions By the Civil Aeronautics Board. of §§ 1.3 and 1.35 will achieve these re­ CHANGE ACT [seal] H arold R . S a n d er so n , sults, and they are necessary to improve Secretary. Definition of Floor Trader and Record the Authority’s ability to detect illegal [F.R. Doc. 67-5761; Filed, May 23, 1967; Keeping trading practices which are detrimental 8:47 a n .] to market users and the general public. On January 28, 1967, there was pub­ Therefore, pursuant to the Provisions lished in the F ederal R e g is t e r (32 F.R. of the Commodity Exchange Act, said 1042) a notice of proposed amendments §§1.3 and 1.35 are hereby amended as Title 15— COMMERCE AND of §§ 1.3 and 1.35 of the general regula­ follows: tions (17 CFR 1.3, 1.35) under the Com­ (1) Section 1.3 is amended by adding modity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) at the end thereof a new paragraph (x) FOREIGN TRADE with respect to records of cash com­ reading as follows: Chapter II— National Bureau of Stand­ modity and futures transactions. Inter­ § 1.3 Definitions. ards, Department of Commerce ested persons were afforded opportunity ***** to submit written data, views, or argu­ SUBCHAPTER B— STANDARD REFERENCE ments on the proposal. (x) Floor trader. A member of a con­ MATERIALS tract market who, on the exchange floor, Prior to the publication of the notice executes a futures trade for his own ac­ PART 230— STANDARD REFERENCE on January 28, 1967, conferences were count or an account controlled by him, MATERIALS held with officials and members of all of the exchanges which would be affected or has such a trade made for him. Subpart D— Standards of Certified by the proposed changes. At these con­ (2) Section 1.35 is amended to read as Properties and Purity ferences, tentative proposed record­ follows: keeping requirements were discussed in S tandard R u b b e r s and R u b b e r C o m ­ § 1.35 Records of cash commodity and detail in order that the Commodity Ex­ futures transactions. p o u n d in g M a te r ia ls change Authority might have the benefit Under the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 275a of the experience and views of the ex­ (a) Futures commission merchants and 277, the following amendment relat­ changes, and that the requirements and members of contract markets : ing to standard reference materials is­ might be kept to a reasonable minimum. Each futures commission merchant and sued by the National Bureau of Stand­ As a result'of the discussions held with each member of a contract market shall ards is effective upon publication in the the exchanges, several changes were keep full, complete, and systematic rec­ Federal R e g is t e r . made in the tentative requirements origi­ ords, together with all pertinent data The amendment rev ises § 230.8-6, nally presented to them. and memoranda, of all transactions re­ Standard rubbers and rubber compound­ Written data, views, and arguments lating to his business of dealing in com­ ing materials, to (1) renew and change received pursuant to the notice of pro­ modity futures and cash commodities. the price of standard reference mate­ posed rule making were carefully re­ He shall retain the required records, rial 388c, and renumber the material viewed, and it was determined to provide data, and memoranda in accordance 388d, and (2) add standard reference further opportunity for the presentation with the requirements of § 1.31, and material 390. Accordingly, § 230.8-6 is of views in an oral hearing. Such a hear­ shall produce them for inspection and revised to read; ing was held on March 28,1967, at which shall furnish true and correct infor­ time the need for the amendments was mation and reports as to the contents § 230.8—6 Standard rubbers and rubber explained by the Commodity Exchange or the meaning thereof, when and as compounding materials. Authority in a statement which appears requested by any authorized representa­ * * * ♦ * in the transcribed record of that hearing. tive of the U.S. Department of Agricul­ (a) Standard rubbers. Oral statements made at the hearing and ture or the U.S. Department of Justice. written submissions filed at that time Included among such Records shall be Approxi­ were carefully considered. Pursuant to ail orders (filled, unfilled, or canceled), Sample Kind mate Price these comments one additional change trading cards, signature cards, street Nos. weight In was made in the proposed amendments, books, journals, ledgers, canceled checks, grams consisting of the addition of the paren­ copies of confirmations, copies of state­ * * * * * * • * * • • * thetic statement which appears at the ments of purchase and sale and all other 388d_ Butyl______27.000 $105.00 end of § 1.35(d). records, data, and memoranda which 390 Butyl (Mooney viscosity 27.000 95.00 After due consideration of all com­ have been prepared in the course of his only). ments submitted pursuant to the notice business of dealing in commodity fu­ of proposed rule making or at the hear­ tures and cash commodities. * * * ** ing and other information available to (b) Futures commission merchants (Sec. 9, 31 Stat. 1450, as amended; 15 U.S.C. the Department of Agriculture, it is and clearing members of contract mar­ 277. Interprets or applies Sec. 7, 70 Stat. 959; hereby found that the amendments of kets: Each futures commission mer­ 15 U.S.C. 275a) §§ 1.3 and 1.35 set forth herein are rea­ chant and each clearing member of a Dated: May 15,1967. sonably necessary to effectuate the pro­ contract market shall, as a m inim um visions and accomplish the purposes of requirement, prepare regularly and A. V. Astin, the Commodity Exchange Act. The vol­ promptly, and keep systematically and Director. ume of futures trading in regulated in permanent form, the following: [F.R. Doc. 67-5728; Filed, May 23, 1967; commodities has increased tremendously (1) A financial ledger record which 8:45 ajm.] and is expected to continue at very high will show separately for each customer

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7594 RULES AND REGULATIONS all charges against and credits to such The record required by this paragraph customer’s account, including but not (e) shall show, by appropriate and uni­ Title 33— NAVIGATION AND limited to funds or securities deposited, form symbols, exchanges of futures for withdrawn, or transferred, and charges cash, transfer trades, and trades cleared NAVIGABLE WATERS or credits resulting from losses or gains on dates other than the date of execu­ on closed transactions; tion. Chapter II— Corps of Engineers, (2) A record of transactions which (f) Each contract market shall pro­ Department of the Army will show separately for each account vide for the identification of floor PART 204— DANGER ZONE (including house accounts) all com­ brokers, floor traders, and clearing mem­ modity futures transactions executed for bers, in the records required to be kept REGULATIONS such account, including the date, price, under paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of San Pablo Bay, Calif. quantity, market, commodity, and future; this section, by the use of a distinctive, and nonvariable designation for each such Pursuant to the provisions of section 7 (3) A record or journal which will floor broker, floor trader, and clearing of the River and Harbor Act of August 8, show separately for each business day member. 1917 (40 Stat. 266; 33 U.S.C. 1 ), § 204.216 complete details of all commodity futures (Sec. 4g, 49 Stat. 1496; sec. 5(b), 42 Stat. establishing and governing the use and transactions executed on that day, in­ 1000, as amended; sec. 8a(5), 49 Stat. 1500, navigation of a danger zone in San Pablo cluding the date, price, quantity, mar­ as amended; 7 U.S.C. 6g, 7(b), 12a(5); 29 Bay, Calif., is hereby amended with re­ ket, commodity, future, and the person F.R. 16210, as amended) spect to “Note” at the end of paragraph for whom such transaction was made. (a) to extend the period of use, as The amendments set forth above are follows: (c) Clearing members of contract the same as those proposed in the notice markets: In the daily record or journal of rule making, except for changes made § 204.216 San Pablo Bay, Calif.; gun­ required to be kept under paragraph pursuant to comments received in the nery range, U.S. Naval Schools Com­ (b) (3) of this section, each clearing rule making proceedings or for clarity. mand, Mare Island, Vallejo. member of a contract market shall also The principal clarifying change is the (a) The danger zone. * * * show the floor broker or floor trader addition of paragraph (f) in § 1.35. It executing each transaction, the opposite Note : The danger zone shall be used u n til does not appear that further rule making June 2, 1968, after which it shall be subject floor broker or floor trader, and the op­ procedure on these changes would make to review to determine the further need posite clearing member with whom it additional information available to the thereof. was made. Department. Therefore, under the ad­ ***** (d) Members of contract markets: ministrative procedure provisions in 5 [Regs., May 4, 1967, 1507-32 (San Pablo Bay, Each member of a contract market U.S.C. 553, it is found upon good cause Calif.)-ENGCW-ON] (Sec. 7, 40 Stat. 266; 33 who, in the place provided by the con­ that further notice and public procedure U.S.C. 1) tract market for the meeting of persons with respect to the amendments are im­ K enneth G. W ickham, similarly engaged, executes purchases or practicable and unnecessary. Major General, U.S. Army, sales of any commodity for future deliv­ The recordkeeping requirements con­ The Adjutant General. ery on or subject to the rules of such con­ tained herein have been approved by the [F.R. Doc. 67-5727; Filed, May 23, 1967; tract market, shall prepare regularly and Bureau of the Budget in accordance with 8:45 am.] promptly a trading card or other record the Federal Reports Act of 1942. showing such purchases and sales. The amendments shall become effec­ Such trading card or record shall show tive on July 1, 1967. his own name, the name of the member firm clearing the trade, the date, price, Done at Washington, D.C., this 18th Title 36— PARKS, FORESTS, quantity, commodity and future, and day of May, 1967. shall clearly identify the opposite floor George L. Mehren, AND MEMORIALS broker or floor trader with whom such Assistant Secretary. Chapter I— National Park Service, transaction was executed, and the op­ [F.R. Doc. 67-5775; Filed, May 23, 1967; Department of the Interior posite clearing member (if, in accordance 8:49 a.m.] with the rules or practice of the contract PART 7— SPECIAL REGULATIONS RE­ market such opposite clearing member is LATING TO PARKS AND MONU­ made known to him ). Title 29— LABOR MENTS (e) Contract markets: Each con­ tract market shall maintain or cause to Subtitle A— Office of the Secretary of Fishing in Yellowstone National be maintained by its clearing organiza­ Labor Park, Wyo. tion a record which shall show for each futures trade: The date, commodity, fu­ PART 60— IMMIGRATION; AVAIL­ Notice is hereby given that pursuant to ture, quantity, price, floor broker or floor ABILITY OF, AND ADVERSE EFFECT the authority contained in section 3 of trader buying, clearing member buying, UPON, AMERICAN WORKERS the Act of August 25, 1816 (39 Stat. 535, floor broker or floor trader selling, clear­ 16 U.S.C. 3), 245 DM-1 (27 F.R. 6395), ing member selling, and a symbol indi­ Correction of CFR National Park Service Order No. 34 (31 cating the customer type. The customer F.R. 4255)', Regional Director, Midwest In the revision of Title 29, Parts 0 to Region Order No. 4 (31 F.R. 5769), as type indicator shall show whether the 499, revised as of January 1, 1967, the person executing the trade: amended, § 7.13 of Title 36, Code of Fed­ text of § 60.2(a) (2) which was inad­ eral Regulations is amended as set forth (1) Was trading for his own account vertently omitted, reads as follows: below. The purpose of this amendment is or an account which he controlled; to extend the open season date of fishing, (2) Was trading for his clearing mem­ § 60.2 Certification and noncertification schedules. and to define and clarify fishing regula­ ber’s house account; tions with respect to existing catch and (3) Was trading for another member (a) Determination. * * * possession limits, and to provide for the present on the exchange floor, or an ac­ (2) For the categories of employment closing of streams to fishing when re­ count controlled by such other member; described in Schedule B, the determina­ search programs are in progress. or tion and certification required by section It has been determined that public (4) Was trading for any other type of 212(a) (14) cannot now be made. comment on these amendments is im­ customer. * * * * * practical, unnecessary, and contrary to

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 RULES AND REGULATIONS 7595 the public interest, since these amend­ § 7.13 Yellowstone National Park. ling shall be a total of five (5) fish per ments will relax a restriction upon the * * * * person fishing of which no more than public and authorize fishing at an earlier (e) Fishing—(1) Open season. Ex­three (3) may be taken from Yellowstone date than was previously in effect; will cept as otherwise provided, the open sea­ Lake and its tributaries or from Yellow­ clarify for the public during this fishing son for fishing in the waters of the park stone River and its tributaries above the season the limits on catch and in posses­ shall be from sunrise on May 28 to sun­ Upper Falls at Canyon. A person must sion; and will provide authority for the set on October 31. cease fishing immediately upon filling his Superintendent to adequately manage (2) Limited open season. * * * catch limit. fisheries research projects which are be­ (ii) All streams emptying into Yellow­ (ii) The number of trout or graylings ing conducted within the park and which stone Lake are open to fishing from sun­ which may be possessed by any person require protection drndng this fishing rise on July 15 to sunset on October 31, during any day shall not exceed five (5). season. In order that the public may have except those streams which may be closed The possession limit shall apply to all the benefits of the extended fishing sea­ by the Superintendent during periods non-commerially processed trout and son, and the clarification of the catch when active research programs are in and possession limits as soon as possible progress. Notice of closure of such grayling which are in possession of a and so that fisheries research programs streams will be made by the posting of person. within the park will not be jeopardized official signs. For fishing purposes, signs ***** during this fishing season, these amend­ and buoys within 100 yards of the stream ments shall take effect immediately upon outlets or inlets on Yellowstone Lake (5 U.S.C. 553; 39 Stat. 535; 16 UJ5.C. 3) ederal egis their publication in the F R ­ shall define these stream waters from J ohn S. McLaughlin, ter. the lake waters. Superintendent, Subparagraphs (1), (2)(ii), and (5) * * * * * Yellowstone National Park. of paragraph (e) of § 7.13 are amended (5) Catch and possession limits, (i) [F.R. Doc. 67-5736; Filed, May 23, 1967; to read as follows : The daily catch limit of trout and gray­ 8:45 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7596 Proposed Rule Making

erally, it can be presumed that milk 4. Need for emergency action on DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE not needed for fluid use could be moved Issue 3. Consumer and Marketing Service to nearby manufacturing plants in the This decision deals with Issues 3 and 4. country at substantial transportation Issues 1 and 2 will be dealt with in a later [ 7 CFR Part 1004 1 savings. However, the cooperative con­ decision. tends that the outlets for a large share Findings and conclusions. The follow­ MILK IN DELAWARE VALLEY of the reserve milk supplies associated ing findings and conclusions on the ma­ MARKETING AREA with the Delaware Valley market are so terial issues are based on evidence pre­ located that there is, in fact, no signifi­ sented at the hearing and the record Notice of Proposed Suspension of cant savings on transportation charges thereof: Certain Provisions of the Order on milk diverted to such outlets. There­ 3. Classification of milk moved to non­ Notice is hereby given that, pursuant fore, they contend that pricing diverted pool plants. The Southeastern Florida to the provisions of the Agricultural milk at the plant of physical receipt im­ order should, under specified conditions, Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as poses a significant burden on the indi­ allow a Class IV classification of bulk amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the sus­ vidual producers involved. milk moved to nonpool plants. pension of certain provisions of the order All persons who desire to submit Presently, fluid milk products trans­ regulating the handling of milk in the written data, views, or arguments in con­ ferred or diverted in bulk from a pool Delaware Valley marketing area is being nection with the proposed suspension plant to a nonpool plant located within considered for the period after May 31, should file the same with the Hearing 500 miles of West Palm Beach (except 1967. Clerk, Room 112-A, Administration an other order plant or a producer-han­ The provisions proposed to be sus­ Building, U.S. Department of Agricul­ dler plant) may be classified as Class n pended are: (1) In the introductory ture, Washington, D.C. 20250, not later or Class IH milk. Such classification is paragraph of § 1004.15, the provision “or than 3 days from the date of publica­ allowed if there is sufficient utilization an other order plant”. (2) In subpara­ tion of this notice in the F ederal in these classes at the nonpool plant after graph (d) of § 1004.15 the provision “ex­ R egister. All documents filed should be the assignment of the plant's Class I cept that, for the purpose of applying in quadruplicate. utilization to its receipts. location adjustments pursuant to All written submissions made pursuant Independent Dairy Farmers’ Associa­ §§ 1004.52 and 1004.82 milk which is di­ to this notice will be made available for tion proposed that the present provisions verted from a pool plant to a plant at public inspection at the office of the be changed to allow Class IV classifica­ which a greater location adjustment Hearing Clerk during regular business tion as well as Class n or Class IH classi­ credit is applicable shall be priced at the hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)). fication on bulk milk moved to nonpool latter location.” plants. The association claims that the Signed at Washington, D.C., on May Class IV classification and pricing would These suspensions would be applicable 22,1967. be more commensurate with the salvage to the Delaware Valley order as amended Clarence H. G irard, value of unneeded producer milk that effective June 1, 1967. A major coopera­ Deputy Administrator, must be moved to nonpool plants for dis­ tive in the market requested suspension Regulatory Programs. posal. The association, which represents action on the basis that such provisions [F.R. Doc. 67-5820; Filed, May 23, 1967; about three-fourths of the producer milk will impede the efficient handling of re­ 8:49 a.m.] supply in the market, assumes the serve milk supplies pending considera­ function of disposing of the milk in the tion at a public hearing of proposed [ 7 CFR Parts 1012, 1013 1 market that is not needed by handlers. modifications of the provisions to better [Docket Nos. AO 347-46, AO 286-A13] Milk not needed in the market for accommodate the existing market situa­ Class I use is generally processed into tion. MILK IN TAMPA BAY AND SOUTH­ Class H products such as cream items, Because most Federal orders determine EASTERN FLORIDA MARKETING buttermilk, and chocolate drink and into producer status on the basis of receipt of AREAS Class IH products such as cottage cheese milk directly from the farm at a pool Emergency Decision- on Proposed and frozen desserts. Facilities for manu­ plant, no provision was made in the Dela­ facturing, storable products such as but­ ware Valley order for diversions to an Amendments to Tentative Market­ ter, nonfat dry milk, and hard cheeses other order plant. One of the primary ing Agreement and to Order are not available in the market or within outlets used by the cooperative for the Pursuant to the provisions of the Agri­ a reasonable distance from the market. disposition of reserve milk is a pool plant cultural Marketing Agreement Act of Thus, it is often difficult to find an outlet under another Federal order. However, for any remaining producer milk. Han­ 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), dlers have accommodated producers by under the terms of such other order such and the applicable rules of practice and separating the milk for the purpose of milk cannot acquire producer status un­ procedure, governing the formulation of salvaging the butterfat, with the skim der that order. Accordingly, milk di­ marketing agreements and marketing milk portion being dumped or used as verted by the cooperative to such other orders (7 CFR Part 900), a public hear­ livestock feed. Milk handled in this man­ order plant would not hold producer ing was held at Tampa and Miami, Fla., ner at a pool plant is classified as Class status under either order. The requested on April 28, and May 1, 1967, pursuant IV milk. The Class IV price reflects only the suspension would permit retention of to notices thereof issued on March 15, value of the butterfat contained in the producer status under the Delaware 1967 (32 F.R. 4313) and on March 28, milk. No value is returned to producers Valley order. 1967 (32 F.R. 5472). for the skim milk portion. In March 1967, With respect to the point of pricing of The material issues on the record of for example, the Class IV price was $3.05 diverted milk, the provision was intended the hearing relate to: per hundredweight on a 3.5 percent but­ to deter the association of milk with the 1. The Class I price; terfat basis. The Class IH price that month was $4.16. pool which was intended solely for 2. Shrinkage allowance for producer The separation capacity at pool plants manufacturing uses and to insure, that milk; is no longer sufficient to take care of the the pool could not subsidize transporta­ 3. Classification of milk moved to non­ Class IV milk that must be handled. The tion costs which are not incurred. Gen­ pool plants; and handler who had been separating up to

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 7597 40 percent of the market’s Class IV milk Act, are not reasonable in view of the and of the previously issued amendments has relocated his pool plant and is no price of feeds, available supplies of feeds, thereto; and all of said previous findings longer in a position to handle Class IV and other economic conditions which af­ and determinations are hereby ratified milk. The cooperative association con­ fect market supply and demand for milk and affirmed, except insofar as such find­ templates moving excess producer milk in the marketing area, and the minimum ings and determinations may be in con­ to a nonpool plant in Miami, the only prices specified in the proposed market­ flict with the findings and determina­ such facility available locally with ade­ ing agreement and the order, as hereby tions set forth herein. quate separating capacity to handle Class proposed to be amended, are such prices (a) Findings upon the basis of the IV milk. The lowest classification pres­ as will reflect the aforesaid factors, in­ hearing record. Pursuant to the provi­ ently allowed under the order on milk sure a sufficient quantity of pure and sions of the Agricultural Marketing moved to nonpool plants is Class m . wholesome milk, arid be in the public in­ Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 The order should be changed to allow terest; and U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable a Class IV classification on such milk, as (c) The tentative marketing agreementrules of practice and procedure govern­ producers proposed. There is no economic and the order, as hereby proposed to be ing the formulation of marketing agree­ reason for differentiating between pool amended, will regulate the handling of ments and marketing orders (7 CFR plants and nonpool plants in the classi­ milk in the same manner as, and will be Part 900), a public hearing was held fication of milk of which only the but- applicable only to persons in the respec­ upon certain proposed amendments to terfat portion has any returnable value. tive classes of industrial and commercial the tentative marketing agreement and Adoption of the proposal will result in activity specified in, a marketing agree­ to the order regulating the handling of more equitable classified pricing for ment upon which a hearing has been milk in the Southeastern Florida mar­ handlers on any surplus milk which they held. keting area. Upon the basis of the evi­ must dispose of to nonpool plants. Marketing agreement and order. An­ dence introduced at such hearing and 4. Need for emergency action on Is­nexed hereto and made a part hereof are the record thereof, it is found that: sue 3. The due and timely execution of two documents entitled, respectively, (1) The said order as hereby amended, the functions of the Secretary under the “Marketing Agreement Regulating the and all of the terms and conditions Act imperatively and unavoidably re­ Handling of Milk in the Southeastern thereof, will tend to effectuate the quires the omission of a recommended Florida Marketing Area” and “Order declared policy of the Act; decision and opportunity for filing ex­ Amending the Order, Regulating the (2) The parity prices of milk, as de­ ceptions thereto. Handling of Milk in the Southeastern termined pursuant to section 2 of the The proposed amendments must be Florida Marketing Area”, which have Act, are not reasonable in view of the made effective by June 1 if they are to been decided upon as the detailed and price of feeds, available supplies of feeds, have any practical application in 1967. appropriate means of effectuating the and other economic conditions which Milk supplies relative to fluid sales under foregoing conclusions. affect market supply and demand for the Southeastern Florida order are cus­ milk in the said marketing area, and the tomarily the highest in June. Consider­ It is hereby ordered, That all of this minimum prices specified in the order as ably more milk is disposed of in Class IV decision, except the attached marketing hereby amended are such prices as will in June than in the other months. In agreement, be published in the F ederal reflect the aforesaid factors, insure a 1966, Class IV utilization in June was 72 R egister. The regulatory provisions of sufficient quantity of pure and whole­ percent of the total Class IV utilization said marketing agreement are identical some milk, and be in the public interest; for the year. with those contained in the order, as and It is therefore found that good cause hereby proposed to be amended by the attached order which will be published (3) The said order as hereby amended, exists for omission of the recommended regulates the handling of milk in the decision and the opportunity for filing with this decision. Determination of representative pe­ same manner as, and is applicable only exceptions thereto. to persons in the respective classes of Rulings on proposed findings and con­ riod. The month of March 1967 is hereby determined to be the representative pe­ industrial or commercial activity speci­ clusions. A brief and proposed findings fied in, a marketing agreement upon and conclusions were filed on behalf of riod for the purpose of ascertaining which a hearing has been held. an interested party. The brief, proposed whether the issuance of the attached or­ der, as amended and as hereby proposed Order relative to handling. It is there­ findings and conclusions and the evi­ fore ordered, That on and after the effec­ dence in the record were considered in to be amended, regulating the handling of milk in the Southeastern Florida mar­ tive date hereof the handling of milk in making the findings and conclusions set the Southeastern Florida marketing area forth above. To the extent that the sug­ keting area is approved or favored by gested findings and conclusions filed by producers, as defined under the terms of shall be in conformity to and in compli­ the interested party are inconsistent with the order, as amended and as hereby ance with the terms and conditions of the findings and conclusions set forth proposed to be amended, and who, dur­ the aforesaid order, as amended and as herein, the requests to make such find­ ing such representative period were en­ hereby further amended, as follows: ings or to reach such conclusions are de­ gaged in the production of milk for sale In § 1013.44(c), subparagraphs (1) and nied for the reasons previously stated in within the aforesaid marketing area. (3) (iv) are revised to read as follows: this decision. Signed at W ash in gton , D.C., on § 1013.44 Transfers. General findings. The findings and de­ May 18,1967. * * * * * terminations hereinafter set forth are G eorge L. Mehren, (c) * * * supplementary and in addition to the Assistant Secretary. findings and determinations previously (1) The transferring or diverting han­ made disconnection with the issuance of Order1 Amending the Order Regulating dler claims classification in Class n , Class the aforesaid order and of the previously the Handling of Milk in the Southeast­ HI, or Class IV in his report submitted ern Florida Marketing Area to the market administrator pursuant to issued amendments thereto; and all of § 1013.30; said previous findings and determina­ § 1013.0 Findings and determinations. tions are hereby ratified and affirmed, * * * * * The findings and determinations here­ (3) * * * except insofar as such findings and de­ inafter set forth are supplementary and terminations may be in conflict with the in addition to the findings and determi­ (iv) To the extent that Class I utiliza­ findings and determinations set forth tion is not so assigned to it, the skim milk herein. nations previously made in connection and butterfat in Quid milk products so (a) The tentative marketing agree­ with the issuance of the aforesaid order transferred shall be classified as Class ment and the order as hereby proposed IV milk to the extent available, then as to be amended, and all of the terms and 1 This order shall not become effective un­ Class i n milk, and any remainder as less and until the requirements of § 900.14 conditions thereof will tend to effectu- of the rules of practice and procedure gov­ Class n milk; and at®k e declar« l Policy of the Act; erning proceedings to formulate marketing * * * * • (b) The parity prices of milk, as de­ agreements and marketing orders have been [F.R. Doc. 67-5758; Filed, May 23, 1967; termined pursuant to section 2 of the met. 8:47 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 No. 1 0 0 - 7598 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

Continental. Applies to Models 10—470—D, This amendment is proposed under the IO-470-E, IO-470-F, IO-470-H, 10-470- authority of sections 313(a), 601 and 603 DEPARTMENT OF Ii, IO-470-M, IO—470-N, IO-470-S, IO- 470-U, 10-470—V, and TSIO-470-B, TSIO- of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 TRANSPORTATION 470—C, TSIO-470-D engines. U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423). Federal Aviation Administration Compliance required as indicated, unless In consideration of the foregoing, it already accomplished. is proposed to amend § 39.13 of Part 39 [ 14 CFR Part 39 ] To prevent failure of reground or chrome plated Part No. 626820 cylinder assemblies, of the Federal Aviation Regulations by [Docket No. 67-CE-6-AD] not having the letter “H” stamped on the adding the following new Airworthiness rocker box flange over the exhaust valve, AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES installed on the above referred to Continen­ Directive: tal engine models, accomplish the following: M o o n e y . Applies to Model M20C (Mark 21) Continental Models 10—470 Within the next 200 hours’ time in service airplanes, Serial Numbers 2623 through and TSIO-470 Engines after the effective date of this AD, remove 2737 and 2739 through 3198; Model reground or chrome plated Part No. 626820 M20D (Master) airplanes, Serial Num­ The Federal Aviation Administration cylinder assemblies, not having the letter bers 201 through 260; and Model M20E is considering amending Part 39 of the “H” stamped on the rocker box flange over (Super 21) airplanes, Serial Numbers Federal Aviation Regulations by adding the exhaust valve, and install as replacements 101 through 850. an airworthiness directive applicable to either (1) Continental Part No. 626820 cyl­ Compliance required as indicated unless certain Continental Models 10-470 and inder assemblies identified by the letter “H” already accomplished. TSIO-470 engines. There have been in­ stamped on the rocker box flange over the Service experience indicates that it is nec­ stances of fatigue cracks in the thread exhaust valve, or (2) Continental Part No. essary to replace Dukes fuel pumps now in 626820 cylinder assemblies not having the service with a redesigned Dukes fuel pump runout area of the barrel on reground letter “H” stamped on the rocker box flange as foUows: and chrome plated Continental Part No. over the exhaust valve which have neither (a) For Model M20E (Super 21) Air­ 626820 cylinder assemblies installed in been reground nor chrome plated. planes Equipped with Dukes Fuel Pump: these engines which could result in sep­ (1) Within the next 25 hours time in serv­ aration of the cylinder head from the Issued at Kansas City, Mo., on May 15, ice after April 12, 1965, replace Dukes fuel cylinder barrel. This part number applies 1967. pump, Part Number 4140-00-19, Serial Num­ to two groups of cylinder assemblies, E dward C. Marsh, bers 101, 102, 103, 150 through 312, with Director, Central Region. Dukes fuel pump, Part Number 4140-00-19A, those having the letter “H” stamped on with pump Serial Number above 1551, in the rocker box flange over the exhaust [P.R. Doc. 67-5751; Filed, May 23, 1967; accordance with Mooney Service Bulletin valve, and those which do not have this 8:47 a.m.] M20-121B (Rev. B, 11-4-66). _ identification. Strengthening design fea­ (2) Within the next 100 hours time in tures were incorporated in those cylin­ service after April 12, 1965, replace Dukes ders having the letter “H” stamped on [ 14 CFR Part 39 ] fuel pump, Part Number 4140-00-19, Serial them. The instances of fatigue cracks in Numbers 313 through 613, with Dukes fuel question have occurred on those reground [Docket No. 6360] pump, Part Number 4140-00-19A with pump or chrome plated parts which are not AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES serial number above 1551, in accordance with marked with the letter “H.” Therefore, Mooney Service Bulletin M20-121B (Rev. B, Mooney Model M20C, M20D, M20E 11-4-66). the “H” marked parts will not be covered (3) Within the next 100 hours time in by the proposed AD. Since this condition Airplanes service after the effective date of this AD, is likely to exist or develop in other en­ Amendment 39-45 (30 F.R. 3349), Air­ replace Dukes fuel pump, Part Number gines of the same design, on which the worthiness Directive 65-6-5, requires the 4140-00-19A, Serial Numbers 614 through unmarked reground or chrome plated replacement of Dukes fuel pumps with 1551 with Dukes fuel pump, Part Number cylinder assemblies are installed, the pro­ 4140-00-19A with pump serial number above redesigned pumps on Mooney M20C, 1551, in accordance with Mooney Service posed AD would require, within the next M20D, and M20E airplanes. After issuing 200 hours’ time in service after the effec­ Bulletin M20-121B (Rev. B, 11-4-66). Amendment 39-45, due to service experi­ (b) For Models M20C (Mark 21) and M20D tive date of this AD, that these cylin­ ence, the Agency determined that cor­ (Master) Airplanes Equipped with Dukes ders be removed from service. rective action is also required for more Fuel Pump: Interested persons are invited to par­ recently manufactured aircraft having (1) Within the next 25 hours time in serv­ ticipate in the making of the proposed higher serial numbers than those speci­ ice after April 12, 1965, replace Dukes fuel rule by submitting such written data, fied in the Airworthiness Directive. pump, Part Number 4140-00-21, Serial Num­ views, or arguments as they may desire. Therefore, the Agency is considering su­ bers 100, 102, 103, 150 through 244, with Communications should identify the perseding Amendment 39-45'with a new Dukes fuel pump, Part Number 4140-00-21A docket number and be submitted in du­ with pump serial number above 1159, in ac­ AD applicable to additional aircraft re­ cordance with Mooney Service Bulletin M20- plicate to the Director, Central Region, quiring the replacement of Dukes fuel Attention: Regional Counsel, Airworthi­ 121B, (Rev. B, 11-4-66). pumps with redesigned models. (2) Within the next 100 hours time in ness Rules Docket, 601 Fast 12th Street, Interested persons are invited to par­ Kansas City, Mo. 64106. All communica­ service after April 12, 1965, replace Dukes ticipate in making of the proposed rule fuel pump, Part Number 4140-00-21, Serial tions received within 30 days after publi­ by submitting such written data, views, Numbers 245 through 409, with Dukes cation of the notice in the F ederal R eg­ or arguments as they may desire. Com­ fuel pump, Part Number 4140-00-21A with ister will be considered before action is munications should identify the docket pump serial number above 1159, in accord­ taken upon the proposed rule. The pro­ number and be submitted in triplicate to ance with Mooney Service Bulletin Number posals contained in this notice may be the Federal Aviation Administration, Re­ M20-121B (Rev. B, 11-4-66). changed in the light of comments re­ gional Counsel, Post Office Box 1689, (3) Within the next 100 hours time in ceived. All comments will be available, service after the effective date of the AD, Fort Worth, Tex. 76101. replace Dukes fuel pump, Part Number 4140- both before and after the closing date All communications received within 00-21A, Serial Numbers 410 through 1159, for comments, in the Airworthiness Rules 30 days after publication of this notice with Dukes fuel pump, Part Number 4140- Docket for examination by interested will be considered by the Director be­ 00-21A with pump serial number above 1159, fore taking action upon the proposed in accordance with Mooney Service Bulletin persons. rule. The proposals contained in this M20-121B (Rev. B, 11-4-66). This amendment is proposed under the notice may be changed in the light of (c) For Model M20E, Serial Numbers 101 authority of sections 313(a), 601, and comments received. All comments will through 263, Model M20C, Serial Numbers 603 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 be made a part of the official docket and 2623 through 2690, and Model M20D, Serial Numbers 201 through 226, concurrent with (49 UJS.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423). will be available for examination by in­ the fuel pump replacement in (a) and (b) In consideration of the foregoing, tt terested persons, both before and after above, remove Mooney electric fuel pump is proposed to amend § 39.13 of Part 39 the closing date for comments, at the mounting bracket, Part Number 610032, and Office of the Regional Counsel, South­ install redesigned pump bracket, Part Num­ of the Federal Aviation Regulations by west Region, Federal Aviation Adminis­ ber 610048, in accordance with Mooney Serv­ adding the following new AD: tration, Fort Worth, Tex. ice Letter 20-120, dated March 18, 1964.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 7599 This supersedes Amendment 39-45, 30 F.R. in a 33-mil© radius of Sioux FaUs VORTAC, ing, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, 3349, AD 65-6-5. extending from a line 5 miles southwest of Mo. 64106. and parallel to the Sioux Falls VORTAC 336° Issued in Fort Worth, Tex., on May 11, radial clockwise to the northwest edge of This amendment is proposed under the 1967. V—148, excluding the portion which overlies authority of section 307(a) of the Fed­ H enry L. Newman, V—181. eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348). Director, Southwest Region. The proposed 700-foot floor transition Issued at Kansas City, Mo., on May 5, [PR. Doc. 67-5752; Filed, May 23, 1967; area will provide controlled airspace pro­ 1067. 8:47 a.m.] tection for arriving and departing air­ Daniel E. Barrow, craft at Joe Foss Field, Sioux Falls, Acting Director, Central Region. S. Dak., during descent from 1,500 to [F.R. Doc. 67-5753; Filed, May 23, 1967; [14 CFR Part 71 1 1.000 feet above the surface and during 8:47 a.m.] [Airspace Docket No. 67-CE-5] climb to 1,200 feet above the surface. TRANSITION AREA The proposed 1,200-foot floor transi­ tion area will provide controlled airspace [ 14 CFR Parts 71, 73 1 protection for arriving and departing Proposed Alteration; Supplemental [Airspace Docket No. 67-WE-8] Notice aircraft at this airport during the por­ tions of the arrival procedures executed RESTRICTED AREA AND CONTI­ The Federal Aviation Administration is between 1,500 feet above the surface and NENTAL CONTROL AREA considering an amendment to Part 71 of 5.000 feet MSL and during the portion of the Federal Aviation Regulations which the departure procedures executed be­ Proposed Designation and would alter the controlled airspace in the tween 1,200 feet above the surface and Alteration Sioux Falls, S. Dak., terminal area. 5.000 feet MSL. In a notice of proposed rule making The proposed transition area with a The Federal Aviation Administration published in the F ederal R egister on floor of 5,000 feet MSL will provide con­ is considering amendments to Parts 71 February 21, 1967 (32 F.R. 3101), the trolled airspace protection for aircraft and 73 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ Federal Aviation Administration pro­ holding at the Chester, Sherman, Parker, tions that would designate a new joint posed to alter the Sioux Falls, S. Dak., and Canton, S. Dak., intersections, and use restricted area near Tonopah, Nev., transition area by redesignating it as for the portions of the high altitude ap­ and include it in the continental control follows: proach procedures executed above 5,300 area. That airspace extending upward from 700 feet MSL. The portions of this 5,000-foot Interested persons may participate in feet above the surface within a 10-mile radius MSL floor transition area southeast and the proposed rule making by submitting of Sioux Falls/Joe Foss Field (latitude 43 °- west of Sioux Falls in conjunction with such written data, views, or arguments 34'44" N„ longitude 96°44'27” W.); within the 1,200-foot and 700-foot transition as they may desire. Communications a 21-mile radius of the Sioux Falls VORTAC, areas will provide controlled airspace should identify the airspace docket num­ extending from a line 5 miles east of and protection for aircraft transitioning to ber and be submitted in triplicate to the parallel to the 154® radial, clockwise to the and from jet route J-82. Director, Western Region, Attention: 329° radial, and within a 17-mile radius of Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Avi­ the Sioux Falls VORTAC, extending from the The floors of the airways that traverse 329° radial, clockwise to a line 5 miles south the transition area proposed herein will ation Administration, 5651 West Man­ of and parallel to the 070° radial, and that automatically coincide with the floors of chester Avenue, Post Office Box 90007, airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet the transition area. Airport Station, Los Angeles, Calif. 90009. above the surface within a 43-mile radius of No procedural changes will be effected All communications received within 30 the Sioux Falls VORTAC, extending from in conjunction with the actions proposed days after publication of this notice in the south edge of V-120 east of Sioux FaUs herein. the F ederal R egister will be considered clockwise to the south edge of V-120 west of Specific details of this proposal may be before action is taken on the proposed Sioux Falls; and within a 33-mile radius of amendments. The proposal contained in Sioux Falls VORTAC, extending from a line examined by contacting the Chief, Stand­ 5 miles southwest of and parallel to the 336° ards and Airspace Branch, Air Traffic this-notice may be changed in the light radial, clockwise to a line 5 miles south of Division, Federal Aviation Administra­ of comments received. and parallel to the 070° radial. tion, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, An official docket will be available for Mo. 64106. examination by interested persons at the Subsequent to publication of the notice Federal Aviation Administration, Office of proposed rule making, it has been de­ Interested persons may submit such written data, views, or arguments as they of the General Counsel, Attention: Rules termined that the proposed transition Docket, 800 Independence Avenue SW., area must be revised in order to provide may desire. Communications should be submitted in triplicate to the Director, Washington, D.C. 20590. An informal a more effective use of airspace. The pro­ docket also will be available for examina­ posed revision will consist of raising the Central Region, Attention: Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Aviation Admin­ tion at the office of the Regional Air floor on part of the proposed 1,200-foot Traffic Division Chief. » floor transition area and by reducing the istration, Federal Building, 601 East 12th amount of 700-foot floor transition area. Street, Kansas City, Mo. 64106. All com­ The Tonopah Test Range, presently munications received within 45 days designated as Restricted Area R-4809, In view of the foregoing, the proposed after publication of this notice in the has been utilized by the Atomic Energy notice is amended to propose that the F ederal R egister will be considered be­ Commission (AEC) since 1956. Addi­ Sioux Falls transition area be redesig­ fore action Is taken on the proposed tional rocket programs scheduled for nated as follows: amendment. No public hearing is con­ testing at the Tonopah Test Range can­ That airspace extending upward from 700 templated at this time, but arrangements not be contained within the existing feet above the surface, within a 17-mile ra­ for informal conferences with Federal R-4809 and ground installations and in­ dius of the Sioux Falls VORTAC; that air­ Aviation Administration officials may be strumentation within R-4807 and R-4808 space extending upward from 1,200 feet above prevent their use for impact areas. The the surface within a 25-mile radius of Sioux made by contacting the Regional Air Falls VORTAC extending from a line 5 miles Traffic Division Chief. Any data, views, test rockets would be fired from launch­ southwest of and parallel to the Sioux Falls or arguments presented during such con­ ers located in the Tonopah Test Range, VORTAC 336° radial clockwise to the north­ ferences must also be submitted in writ­ R-4809 and the proposed restricted area west edge of V-148, and extending from the ing in accordance with this notice in would provide two impact areas. The south edge of V—120 east of Sioux Falls clock­ order to become part of the record for proposed new area would be designated wise to the south edge of V—120 west of Sioux consideration. The proposal contained in as R-4814 and subdivided into two parts Falls; and that airspace extending upward to provide more flexibility in the man­ from 5,000 feet MSL within a 43-mile radius this notice may be changed in the light of Sioux Falls VORTAC, extending from the of comments received. agement of the airspace under the joint south edge of V-120 east of Sioux Falls clock­ The public docket will be available for use concept. wise to the south edge of V—120 west of Sioux examination by interested persons in the The Tonopah Test Range launch fa­ Falls, excluding the area which overlies V-15, Office of the Regional Counsel, Federal cilities and associated instrumentation V-15E, V-148, V—181, and V-181W; and with­ Aviation Administration, Federal Build­ are a part of an $11 million investment

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 « 7600 PROPOSED RULE MAKING in permanent testing facilities. Due to The surface underlying the proposed Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 17, the close proximity to Albuquerque, restricted area is almost entirely public 1967. N. Mex., and the remote location of the land under the jurisdiction of the Bu­ H. B. H elstrom, test range, the Atomic Energy Commis­ Chief, Airspace and Air sion considers it to be in the best inter­ reau of Land Management and the For­ Traffic Rules Division. est Service. As a safety precaution, all est of the Government to be able to [F.R. Doc. 67-5754; Filed, May 23, 1967; continue the use of the test range for individuals residing within or having an 8:47 a.m.] rocket testing that requires higher alti­ interest in the area will be evacuated tudes. The apogee of the rockets will during the tests. The AEC will negotiate vary up to 1 million feet. These rockets with these persons and compensate them are essentially vertical probes, wherein INTERSTATE COMMERCE the exit and reentry part of the trajec­ for their inconvenience. In addition, U.S. tory, below 100,000 feet, is practically Highway 25 which runs through the area vertical. will be closed during the test periods. COMMISSION These rockets will be solid fuel ballistic If action is taken to adopt this pro­ [ 49 CFR Part 103 1 devices with one, two, or three stages and posal, a new restricted area, R-4814A [Ex Parte 253] since they do not have guidance mech­ and R-4814B, will be designated at To- anisms, the expected impacts are some­ nopah, Nev., as follows: CARRIER AGREEMENTS RELATING what dispersed. Therefore, the proposed TO RATES, FARES, ETC. restricted area is relatively large in or­ R-4814A T onopah, Nev. der to insure an adequate degree of Stay of Effective Date safety. The reentry payloads envisioned Boundaries: Beginning at latitude 37°53'- 00" N., longitude 116°50'15" W.; thence May 19, 1967. are inert, i.e., nonexplosive, nonfrag­ clockwise via the arc of a circle with a 27- menting, and not radioactive. These statute-mile radius centered at latitude 37 °- Notice of independent action-regula­ rockets, which vary in size from 3 to 13 47'00" N., longitude 116° 21'30" W.; to lat­ tions governing the giving of public inches in diameter and are 3 to 20 feet itude 37°40'30" N., longitude 115°53'00" W.; notice of tariff publication proposals by long, will be fired on an infrequent basis. to latitude 37°42'00" N., longitude 115°53'- individual carriers where publication is AEC plans to fire approximately 10 to 00" W.; to latitude 37°42'00" N., longitude to be effected by a rate conference. 15 rockets per year with each firing pe­ 116°11'00" W.; to latitude 37°53'00" N., lon­ This rulemaking proceeding, initiated- riod scheduled for a duration of 30 hours. gitude 116°11'00" W; to the point of be­ by a notice of proposed rulemaking pub­ ginning. lished in 31 F.R. 13392 on October 15, The actual flight time of the rockets Designated altitudes: Surface to FL 240. from launch to impact is approximately Time of designation: Monday through Sat­ 1966, was conducted under the Commis­ 5 minutes with a maximum of 15 min­ urday, as published by NOTAM issued at least sion’s modified procedure. utes expected. 48 hours in advance and upon termination The Hearing Examiner issued his R-4814A would infringe on a natural of use. recommended report and order propos­ VFR flyway between Las Vegas and Cur­ Controlling agency: Federal Aviation Ad­ ing an amendment to Part 103 of Chapter rant, Nev., and both R-4814A and R- ministration, Salt Lake City ARTC Center. I, Subtitle B of Title 49 of the Code of 4814B would overlie Federal airway V-244 Using agency: Manager, Atomic Energy Federal Regulations. This amendment and jet route J-80. Since the actual clo­ Commission, Albuquerque, N. Mex. was set out in a Notice of Issuance of Ex­ sure periods should be brief and infre­ R-4814B T onopah, Nev. aminer’s Recommended Report and quent, the principal inconvenience to Boundaries: Beginning at latitude 38° 10'- Order published in the rules and regula­ airmen will arise from the necessity for 30" N., longitude 116°21'30" W.; thence tions sectidn on page 6451 of the F ederal checking the status of the area before clockwise via the arc of a circle with a 36- R egister issue of April 26, 1967, as F.R. transit. Normally, the exact time of the statute-mile radius centered at latitude 37 °- Doc. 67-4606. rocket firing is not critical and could 53'30" N., longitude 115°48'20" W.; to On May 11, 1967, notice was published be adjusted to-accommodate aircraft op­ latitude 37°24'00" N., longitude 115°35'00" on page 7128 of the F ederal R egister erating on an air traffic control clearance W.; to latitude 37°28'00" N., longitude 115°- 35'00" W.; to latitude 37°28'00" N., longitude that F.R. Doc. 67-4606 was inadvertently on V-244 and J-80. Delays of such traffic published in the rules and regulations would not be expected except that an 115°48'00" W.; to latitude 37°33'0O" N., longitude 115°48'00" W.; to latitude 37°33'- section of the F ederal R egister, and that occasional aircraft could be delayed for VO" N., longitude 115°53'00" W.; to latitude the document should have been published 5'or 10 minutes. 37°40'3G" N„ longitude 115°53'0O" W.; The proposed restricted area would in­ thence counterclockwise via the arc of a in the Proposed Rule Making Section of clude those segments of two circles which circle with a 27-statute-mile radius centered the April 26,1967 issue. A cross-reference lie outside of existing restricted areas at latitude 37°47'00" N., longitude 116°21'- redesignating F.R. Doc. 67-4606 to the 30" W.; to point of beginning. R-4807, Rr-4808, and R-4809. One circle Designated altitudes: Surface to FL 240. Proposed Rule Making Section was pub­ would be centered on latitude 37°47'00" Time of designation: Monday through lished on page 7134 of the May 11, 1967, N., longitude 116°21'30" W. and have a Saturday, as published by NOTAM issued at F ederal R egister. least 48 hours in advance and upon termina­ radius of 27 statute miles. The other tion of use. Exceptions having been tim ely filed would be centered on latitude 37°53'30" Controlling agency: Federal Aviation Ad­ to the Examiner’s Recommended Report N., longitude 115°48'20" W., and have a ministration, Salt Lake City ARTC Center. and Order the effective date of the pro­ radius of 36 statute miles. The altitudes Using agency: Manager, Atomic Energy posed amendment to Part 103 is stayed Commission, Albuquerque, N. Mex. would include from the surface to flight until further notice. level 240. Aircraft above flight level 240 This amendment Is proposed under [seal] H. N eil Garson, would be separated from the rocket the authority of section 307(a) of the Secretary. firings through air traffic control Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. [F.R. Doc. 67-5767; Filed, May 23, 1967; procedures. 1348). 8:48 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7601

Notices

the above subdivisions, and as shown on the F ederal R egister. A separate notice will attached plat. be sent to each interested party of record. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Total area—2.72 acres, more or less. Bureau of Land Management T. 11 N., R. 14 W., If circumstances warrant, a public Sec. 20, NW%SW}4. hearing will be held at a convenient time [Montana 2105] A tract of land of variable width in the and place, which will be announced. MONTANA above subdivision in accordance with the The lands involved in the application figures and measurements as shown on the are: Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and attached plat. Salt Lake Meridian, Utah Reservation of Lands Total area—0.92 acres, more or less. T. 19 S., R. 7 E., Sec. 8, S^NWi4, and NE^SW ^. May 15, 1967. The areas described aggregate 3.64 acres. The area described contains 120 acres. The Department of Agriculture, on be­ E ugene H. Newell, half of the Forest Service, has filed ap­ Land Office Manager. R. D. Nielson, plication, Montana 2105, for the with­ State Director. [F.R. Dpc. 67-5733; Filed, May 23, 1967; drawal of the lands described below, 8:45 a.m.] [F.R. Doc. 67-5734; Filed, May 23, 1967; from all forms of appropriation, subject 8:45 a.m.] to existing valid claims. The applicant desires the land for the [Utah 2945] [Utah 2930] development of a road in connection with UTAH the administration of the Lolo National UTAH Forest. Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and For a period of 30 days from the date Reservation of Lands Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and of publication of this notice, all persons Reservation of Lands who wish to submit comments, sugges­ M ay 16, 1967. tions, or objections in connection with The U.S. Forest Service, Department May 17, 1967. the proposed withdrawal may present of Agriculture, has filed an application The U.S. Forest Service, Department their views in writing to the undersigned for the withdrawal of the lands described of Agriculture, has filed application for officer of the Bureau of Land Manage­ below, from all forms of appropriation the withdrawal of the lands described ment, Department of the Interior, 316 except the General Mining and Mineral below, from all forms of appropriation North 26th Street, Billings, Mont. 59101. Leasing laws. except the general mining and mineral The Department’s regulations (43 CFR The applicant desires the land for ex­ leasing laws, subject to existing valid 2311.1-3 (c) ) provide that the authorized tending the boundaries of the Manti- rights. officer of the Bureau of Land Manage­ LaSal National Forest. The lands were The applicant desires the land to ex­ ment will undertake such investigations obtained in a private exchange of land tend the boundaries of the Fishlake Na­ as are necessary to determine the exist­ and are suitable for inclusion into the tional Forest, Utah, to include an iso­ ing and potential demand for the lands forest. lated parcel of public domain land suit­ and their resources. He wall also under­ ■For a period of 30 days from the date of able for national forest purposes. take negotiations with the applicant publication of this notice, all persons For a period of 30 days from the date agency with the view of adjusting the ap­ who wish to submit comments, sugges­ of publication of this notice, all persons plication to reduce the area to the mini­ tions, or objections in connection with who wish to submit comments, sugges­ mum essential to meet the applicant’s the proposed withdrawal may present tions, or objections in connection with needs, to provide for the maximum con­ their views in waiting to the undersigned the proposed withdrawal may present current utilization of the lands for the officer of the Bureau of Land Manage­ their views in writing to the undersigned purpose other than the applicant’s, to ment, Department of the Interior, Post office of the Bureau of Land Manage­ eliminate lands needed for purposes more Office Box 11505, Salt Lake City, Utah ment, Department of the Interior, Post essential than the applicant’s, and to 84111. Office Box 11505, Salt Lake City, Utah reach agreement on the concurrent man­ The Department’s regulations (43 CFR 84111. agement of the lands and their resources. 2311.1-3 (c) ) provide that the authorized The Department’s regulations (43 CFR The authorized officer wall also prepare officer of the Bureau of Land Manage­ 2311.1-3 (c) ) provide that the authorized a report for consideration by the Secre­ ment will undertake such investigations officer of the Bureau of Land Manage­ tary of the Interior who will determine as are necessary to determine the exist­ ment will undertake such investigations whether or not the lands will be with­ ing and potential demand for the lands as are necessary to determine the exist­ drawn as requested by the applicant and their resources. He will also under­ ing and potential demand for the lands agency. take negotiations with the applicant and their resources. He will also under­ The determination of the Secretary on agency with the view of adjusting the take negotiations with the applicant application to reduce the area to the agency with the view of adjusting the the application wall be published in the application to reduce the area to the F ederal Register. A separate notice will minimum essential to meet the appli­ be sent to each interested party of record. cant’s needs, to provide for the maximum minimum essential to ' meet the appli­ If circumstances warrant, a public concurrent utilization of the lands for cant’s needs, to provide for the maximum hearing- will be held at a convenient time purposes other than the applicant’s,, to concurrent utilization of the lands for and place, which will be announced. eliminate lands needed for purposes more purposes other than the applicant’s, to The lands involved in the application essential than the applicant’s, and to eliminate lands needed for purposes more are: reach agreement on the concurrent man­ essential than the applicant’s and to Lolo National F orest agement of the lands and their resources. reach argeement on the concurrent man­ The authorized officer will also prepare agement of the lands and their resources. PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN MONTANA a report for consideration by the Secre­ The authorized officer will also pre­ Harvey Creek Road tary of the Interior who will determine pare a report for consideration by the whether or not the lands will be with­ T- UN.,R. 14 W., Secretary of the Interior who will de­ Sec. 20, Lot 3, SE^SW ^. drawn as requested by the applicant „.A strip of land 60 feet in width, being agency. termine whether or not the lands will be feet on each side of the centerline of The determination of the Secretary on withdrawn as requested by the applicant uarvey Creek Road No. 307 in and through the application will be published in the agency.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7602 NOTICES The determination of the Secretary (Sec. 4, 62 Stat. 1070, as amended; 15 U.S.C. date affords the Board opportunity to on the application will be published in 714b. Interpret or apply sec. 407, 63 Stat. 1066; refuse renewal of the tariff after 3 sec. 105, 63 Stat. 1051, as amended by 76 months if it finds that the fares are not the F ederal R egister. A separate notice Stat. 612; secs. 303, 306, and 307, 76 Stat. will be sent to each interested party of 614-617; U.S.0.1441 (note) ) beneficial, and also provides Frontier record. the opportunity to discontinue the fares If circumstances warrant, a public Signed at Washington, D.C., on May if it finds them to be unsuccessful. Con­ hearing will be held ait a convenient time 18, 1967. cerning discrimination, the carrier states and place, which will be announced. H. D. Godfrey, that discrimination per se is not illegal The lands involved in the application Executive Vice President, and only becomes so if it results in sig­ are: Commodity Credit Corporation. - nificant prejudice; the law does not pro­ Salt Lake Meridian, Utah [PE. Doc. 67-5756; Filed, May 23, 1967; hibit more favorable treatment of one T. 23 Sr, R. 3 E., 8:47 a.m.] sex when the favorable treatment has no Sec. 11, Ey2Ey2, S^SW%, SW%SE1A. adverse effect upon members of the oppo­ site sex. Frontier asserts that there is no The area described aggregates 280 factual basis for finding that the pro­ acres. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD posed fares would have an adverse effect R. D. Nielson, upon other passengers, that men as a State Director. [Docket No. 18573; Order E-25169] class would benefit from the reduced [F.R.' Doc. 67-5735; Filed, May 23, 1967; FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. fares since the proposed tariff will pro­ 8:45 a.m.] vide reduced transportation costs for Order of Investigation and Suspen­ their wives, mothers, sisters, and daugh­ sion Regarding Ladies Fare Pro­ ters, and that the proposed fares would posal eliminate a significant element of dis­ DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE crimination under existing tariffs where­ Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics in a married woman traveling with her Commodity Credit Corporation Board at its office in Washington, D.C., husband receives a substantial Family [Arndt. 1] on the 19th day of May 1967. Plan discount while a single or widowed By tariff1 posted April 17, 1967, and woman is denied such discount. In addi­ SALES OF CERTAIN COMMODITIES marked to become effective June 1, 1967, tion, the carrier states that, rather than May Sales List Frontier Airlines, Inc. (Frontier) has burdening other traffic, its various pro­ proposed ladies round-trip excursion motional fares have resulted in a signifi­ Pursuant to the policy of the Commod­ fares at the level of 60 percent of the cant reduction of unit costs. ity Credit Corporation issued October 12, standard fare applicable to such trans­ Complaints requesting investigation 1954 (19 F.R. 6669), and subject to the portation. Transportation under this and suspension of the Ladies Fare pro­ conditions stated therein, the CCC proposal, is limited to women at least 22 posal have been filed by Northwest Air­ Monthly Sales lis t for May 1967 is years of age, must be completed within lines, Inc. (Northwest), and Western Air amended as set forth below: 15 days after the date of departure of the Lines, Inc. (Western). The complaints 1. A new section which covers Dry going portion of the trip, and is subject assert that the instant proposal is basic­ Edible Beans is inserted immediately af­ to a minimum round-trip fare of $20. ally the same as that filed by Frontier ter the Tung Oil section. The new section The tariff will not be applicable in some in late 1966, and which the Board or­ will read as follows: of Frontier’s competitive markets, and dered investigated and suspended by Dry Edible Beans—(Bagged) bears an expiration date of . August 31, Order E-24563, December 27, 1966. Com­ 1967. plainants contend that a special fare A. Domestic market price but not less than In its letter of justification accom­ based upon the sex of the passenger is the following minimum prices per hundred­ panying the tariff transmittal, and in its weight for U.S. No. f.o.b. indicated points unjustly discriminatory and runs directly of production. Amount of paid-in-freight to answer to complaints, Frontier asserts counter to the Federal Government’s be added as applicable. For other grades and that its proposal is of extraordinary and philosophy of abrogating discrimination locations, adjust by applicable 1966 price unusual importance to the carrier and is based upon sex. in addition, it is asserted support differentials. economically justified, that an experi­ that the proposal is unjust and unreason­ mentation period is required in order to able and that Frontier’s use of an added Class Price per Area of production evaluate the fare, and that the fare is cost technique is improper. cwt. not unjustly discriminatory since it will The Board has determined to investi­ not have an adverse effect upon other gate Frontier’s Ladies Fare proposal. By 7.37 Michigan; passengers. With regard to economic 9.51 Michigan/New York; Order E-24563, December 27, 1966, the Light red kidney.... justification, the carrier asserts that the Board ordered the investigation and sus­ adult female population constitutes an pension of an earlier Frontier Ladies Fare B. Available. Evanston Grain Merchandis­ untapped source for airline travel, that ing ACSC Office. tariff. The instant proposal differs from its Ladies Fare will result in an increase the earlier one in three respects: (1) It of at least 75 percent in adult female 2. An unrestricted use section for pea­ offers a discount of 40 percent instead of travel producing an estimated annual 50 percent; (2) it excludes 29 competitive nuts is being added and will read as increase in operating profit of approxi­ follows: markets instead of applying system- mately $900,000 after allowance for a wide; and (3) it is limited to an initial Unrestricted use. 60 percent diversion of present full-fare 3-month period- instead of 6 months. A. U.S. Medium—Virginia type, offered at female passengers and for the added cost the higher of the market price or 105 percent None of these differences remove the of handling the additional passengers, basic question of discrimination inherent of support plus carrying charges. and that as a result, Frontier’s subsidy B. When stocks are available, lot lists are in the proposal. Therefore, for the rea­ issued by Peanut Growers Cooperative Mar­ would be reduced by $188,000 annually. sons more fully stated in Order E-24563, keting Association, Franklin, Va. The carrier states that it wishes to mar­ December 27, 1966, the Board will also ket test the Ladies Fares and to evaluate suspend the tariff pending investigation. 3. The first sentence of paragraph 12 the success of the Ladies Fares by com­ of press release portion of the Sales List paring the growth and development of Accordingly, pursuant to the Federal is amended to read as follows: traffic in the markets where the Ladies Aviation Act of 1958, and particularly sections 204(a), 403, 404, and 1002 Interest rates per annum under the Fares are applicable with those where CCC Export Credit Sales Program (An­ they are not; that it will develop more thereof: nouncement GSM-3 or GSM-4) for May detailed information on the use of the It is ordered, That: 1967 are 5Yz percent for U.S. bank ob­ fares by means of passenger question­ 1. An investigation be instituted to de­ ligations and 6 Yz percent for foreign bank naires; and that the 3-month expiration termine whether the fares and provisions obligations, without regard to credit pe­ in Rule 18 on 1st Revised Page 32 of riods involved, up to a maximum of 36 *Rule 18 of Airline Tariff Publishers, Inc., tariff CAB No. 101 issued by Airline Tar­ months. * * * Agent, CAB No. 101. iff Publishers, Inc., Agent, and rules, reg-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 NOTICES 7603 illations, and practices affecting such Grace Line, Inc. cant), 111 North Main Street, Owens- fares and provisions, are or will be unjust The Cunard Steam-Ship Co. Ltd. (Cunard). ville, Ind. 47565, filed in Docket No. N.V. Mailschip Rotterdam (HoUand-America CP67-329 an application pursuant to or unreasonable, unjustly discriminatory, Line). unduly preferential, unduly prejudicial, Den norske Amerikalinje A/S (Norwegian section 7(a) of the Natural Gas Act for or otherwise unlawful, and if found to America Line). an order of the Commission directing be unlawful, to determine and prescribe -“Italia” Società’ Per Azioni Di Navigazione Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. (Re­ the lawful fares and provisions, and rules, (Italian Line). spondent) to establish physical connec­ regulations, or practices affecting such Home Lines, Inc. (Home Lines). tion of its transmission facilities with fares and provisions; Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. (Delta Line). the facilities proposed to be constructed 2. Pending hearing and decision by Compagnie Generale Transatlantique by Applicant and to sell and deliver to (French Line). Applicant volumes of natural gas for re­ the Board, the fares and provisions in Transatlantic Shipping Corp. and Trans­ Rule 18 on 1st Revised Page 32 of tariff oceanic Navigation Corp. (Greek Line). sale and distribution in the community of CAB No. 101 issued by Airline Tariff Pub­ Giacomo Costa Fu Andrea (Costa Line) Carlisle, Ind., all as more fully set forth lishers, Inc., Agent, are suspended and (Linea “C”) . in the application which is on file with their use deferred to and including Au­ Moore McCormack Lines, Inc. the Commission and open to public gust 29, 1967, unless otherwise ordered Matson Navigation Co./The Oceanic Steam­ inspection. by the Board, and that no changes be ship Co. (Matson Lines). Applicant proposes to construct and made therein during the period of sus­ Aegean Cruises, S.A. and Unitours, Inc. operate approximately 0.57 miles of 3- (Aegean: Epirotiki Lines). inch lateral transmission line extending pension except by order or special per­ The New Zealand Shipping Co., Ltd. mission of the Board; Jugoslavenska linijska plovidba-Rijeka (Ju- due west from a point of interconnection 3. The proceeding ordered herein be golinija; Yugoline). with Respondent’s main transmission assigned for hearing before an Examiner Compagnie Française de Navigation (Paquet line to a point -of connection with the of the Board at a time and place here­ Lines). proposed municipal distribution system after to be designated; Canadian Pacific Railway Co. (Canadian at the town border of Carlisle, Ind. 4. Except to the extent granted herein, Pacific). Applicant estimates the third year Oceanic Special Shipping Co., Ltd. peak daily and peak annual natural gas the complaints of Northwest Airlines, The Indo China Steam Navigation Co., Ltd. Inc., in Docket 18494, and Western Air requirements at 380 Mcf and 31,000 Mcf, Lines, Inc., in Docket 18489 be dismissed; Dated: May 19, 1967. respectively. Applicant estimates the total cost of and T homas L is i, 5. Copies of this order be filed with the Secretary. the proposed facilities at approximately aforesaid tariff and be served upon Fron­ $98,000, said cost to be financed through tier Airlines, Inc., Northwest Airlines, [F.R. Doc. 67-5764; Filed, May 23,r 1967; the sale of common stock, a bank loan Inc., and Western Air Lines, Inc., which 8:48 a.m.] and cash from internal sources. are hereby made parties to this pro­ Protests or petitions to intervene may ceeding. HANSEATIC SCHIFFAHRTS-GESELL­ be filed with the Federal Power Com­ mission, Washington, D.C. 20426, in ac­ This order will be published in the SCHAFT m.b.H. & CO. ET AL. cordance with the rules of practice and Federal R egister. Security for Protection of the Public; procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or By the Civil Aeronautics Board. Issuance of Performance Certificate before June 12, 1967. [seal] H arold R. Sanderson, Notice is hereby given that pursuant G ordon M. G rant, Secretary. to the provisions of section 3, Public Law Acting Secretary. [F.R. Doc. 67-5762; Filed, May 23, 1967; 89-777 (80 Stat. 1357, 1358) and Federal [F.R. Doc. 67-5729; FUed, May 23, 1967; 8:48 a.m.] Maritime Commission General Order 20 8:45 a.m.] (46 CFR Part 540) that a Certificate of Financial Responsibility for Indemnifi­ [Docket No. CI64—1138] cation of Passengers for Nonperformance FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION of Transportation has been issued to the TEXACO, INC., ET AL. CHICAGO, DULUTH AND GEORGIAN following: Notice of Petition To Amend BAY TRANSIT CO. (GEORGIAN BAY Hanseatic Schiffahrts-Gesellschaft m.b.H. & Co., Deutsche Atlantik Schiffahrts- May 16, 1967. LINE) ET AL. Gesellschaft m.b.H & Co. (Hanseatic Line, Take notice that on May 8, 1967, Tex­ Inc.) (German Atlantic Line) (GAL). aco, Inc. (Operator), et al. (Petitioner), Security for Protection of the Public; Certificate No. P-46. Effective date: May Application for Casualty Certificate 18, 1967. Post Office Box 52332, Houston, Tex. Council on International Educational Ex­ 77052, filed in Docket No. CI64-1138 a Notice is hereby given that pursuant to change, Inc. (Council on Student Travel). petition to amend the order issuing a the provisions of section 2, Public Law Certificate No. P-47. Effective date: May certificate of public convenience and 89-777 (80 Stat. 1357, 1358) and Federal 18, 1967. necessity pursuant to section 7(c) of the Maritime Commission General Order 20, Dated: May 19, 1967. Natural Gas Act in said docket by au­ Amendment 2 (46 CFR Part .540) the thorizing Petitioner to sell additional following persons have applied to the T homas Lis i, volumes of natural gas, all as more fully Federal Maritime Commission for a Cer­ Secretary. set forth in the petition which is on file tificate of Financial Responsibility to [F.R. Doc. 67-5765; Filed, May 23, 1967; with the Commission and open to public Meet Liability Incurred for Death or In­ 8:48 a.m.] inspection. jury to Passengers or Other Persons on Petitioner proposes to sell an addi­ Voyages: tional 4,000 Mcf of natural gas per day Chicago, Duluth and Georgian Bay Transit to El Paso Natural Gas Co. from the Co. (Georgian Bay Line). FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION Fuller Gasoline Plant, Scurry County, Rederiaktiebolaget Clipper (Clipper Steam- [Docket No. CP67-329] Tex., at a total initial rate of 15.74 cents Co.) (Clipper Line). per Mcf at 14.65 p.s.i.a. pursuant to its Victoria Steamship Co., Ltd. (Ineres Line). COMMUNITY NATURAL GAS CO., FPC Gas Rate Schedule No. 328. Peti­ Alaska Cruise Lines, Ltd. INC., AND MIDWESTERN GAS tioner has submitted as a supplement N. V. Nederlandsch-Amerikaansche Stoom- to the related rate schedule a supple­ vaart-Maatschappij (Holland-A m e r i c a TRANSMISSION CO. Line). mental agreement with the gas pur­ EU™Pa'Canada Linie G.m.b.H„ Bremen Notice of Application chaser for the sale of the additional vol­ ^^■opo-Canada Line and ECL Shipping umes. Petitioner agrees to accept a cer­ May 16, 1967. tificate amendment which conforms to Aktiebolaget Svenska Amerika Linien (Swed­ Take notice that on May 8,1967, Com­ the provisions of the Commission’s Opin­ ish American Line). munity Natural Gas Co., Inc. (Appli­ ion No. 468, 34 FPC 159, to the extent

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7604 NOTICES that such provisions are judicially up­ owns 52,221 shares, or approximately 4.1 this matter, including the date of the held or not further stayed. percent of the outstanding capital stock hearing (if ordered) and any postpone­ The subject petition has been filed un­ of Peoples Life. Great American repre­ ments thereof. der protest and is conditioned by Peti­ sents that there are no other relation­ For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ tioner upon a determination being made ships between Trust and either Great gated authority). by the Commission that additional cer­ American or Peoples Life. tificate authorization is required for the Section 17(a) of the Act, as here perti­ [SEAL] ORVAL L. DUBOIS, service proposed. Petitioner states that nent, makes it unlawful for Great Ameri­ Secretary. the proposed increase in sales and de­ can, an affiliate of Trust, to purchase [F.R. Doc. 67-5737; Filed, May 23, 1967; liveries of residue gas derived from cas­ from such registered investment com­ 8:45 a.m.] inghead gas results from a more rapid pany any security or other property un­ rate of production arising out of an in­ less the Commission upon application crease in oil allowables. Petitioner sub­ pursuant to section 17(b) grants an INTERAMERICAN INDUSTRIES, LTD. mits that the subject petition and rate exemption from the provisions of sec­ schedule supplement pertain to the iden­ tion 17(a) after finding that the terms Order Suspending Trading tical gas reserves from which sales were of the proposed transaction, including May 18,1967. heretofore authorized in this docket in­ the consideration to be paid or received, It appearing to the Securities and Ex­ asmuch as the contract comprising Peti­ are reasonable and fair and do not in­ volve overreaching on the part of any change Commission that the summary tioner’s FPC Gas Rate Schedule No. 328 suspension of trading in the capital stock provides that the gas purchaser has the person concerned and that the proposed of Interamerican Industries, Ltd., Cal­ right to increase its daily takes and that transaction is consistent with the policy of the Trust and with the general pur­ gary, Alberta, Canada, being traded in upon commencement of the additional the United States otherwise than on a deliveries the contract volume previously poses of the Act. in effect automatically will be increased Applicant represents that the $40 per national securities exchange is required by the amount of the additional volumes. share purchase price of the Peoples Life in the public interest and for the protec­ Protests or petitions to intervene may stock was the asked price quoted on tion of investors; be filed with the Federal Power Com­ April 12, 1967, the day the arrangement It is ordered, Pursuant to section 15(c) mission, Washington, D.C. 20426, in ac­ was entered into and negotiated at arm’s (5) of the Securities Exchange Act of cordance with the rules of practice and length. Applicant also states that it is 1934, that trading in the United States procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or unlikely that the Trust could sell its 52,- in such securities otherwise than on a before June 12,1967. 221 shares of Peoples Life stock at a more national securities exchange be sum­ favorable price since this block has no marily suspended, this order to be effec­ G ordon M. G rant, value from the standpoint of control in tive for the period May 19,1967, through Acting Secretary. view of the large holdings of persons con­ May 28, 1967, both dates inclusive. [F.R. Doc. 67-5730; Filed, May 23, 1967; nected with the management of Peoples By the Commission. 8:45 a.m.] Life. In addition, applicant indicates that it would probably be unable to [seal] Orval L. DuBois, acquire a block of this size in the open Secretary. market without causing an increase in [F.R. Doc. 67-5766; Filed, May 23, 1967; SECURITIES AND EXCHANBE price to a point where the investment 8:48 a.m.] could no longer be justified. COMMISSION The transaction is to be consummated [812-2104] within 20 days after issuance of the Com­ INTERSTATE COMMERCE GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. mission’s order pursuant to section 17(b). Notice is further given that any inter­ Notice of Filing of Application for ested person may, not later than June 5, COMMISSION Order Exempting Transaction Be­ 1967 at 5:30 pm., submit to the Com­ [Notice 390] tween Affiliated Persons mission in writing a request for a hear­ ing on the matter accompanied by a MOTOR CARRIER TEMPORARY May 18, 1967. statement as to the nature of his interest, AUTHORITY APPLICATIONS Notice is hereby given that Great the reason for such request, and the May 19,1967. American Insurance Co. (“Great Amer­ issues of fact or law proposed to be con­ ican’’), 99 John Street, New York, N.Y. troverted, or he may request that he be The following are notices of filing of 10038, a New York corporation, has filed notified if the Commission shall order a applications for temporary authority un­ an application pursuant to section 17 (b) hearing thereon. Any such communica­ der section 210a(a) of the Interstate of the Investment Company Act of 1940 tion should be addressed: Secretary,' Commerce Act provided for under the (“Act”) for an order exempting from Securities and Exchange Commission, new rules of Ex Parte No. MC 67 (49 CFR the provisions of section 17(a) of the Washington, D.C. 20549. A copy of such Part 340) published in the F ederal Reg­ Act a proposed purchase by Great Amer­ request shall be served personally or by ister, issue of April 27, 1965, effective ican from Insurance Securities Trust mail (airmail if the person being served is July 1, 1965. These rules provide that Fund (“Trust”), a registered open-end, located more than 500 miles from the protests to the granting of an application diversified investment company, of^2,221 point of mailing) upon applicant at the must be filed with the fiejd official named shares of the capital stock of Peoples Life address set forth above. Proof of such in the F ederal R egister publication, Insurance Co. (“Peoples Life”), a life service (by affidavit or in case of an within 15 calendar days after the date of insurance company incorporated in the attorney at law by certificate) shall be notice of the filing of the application is District of Columbia. All interested per­ filed contemporaneously with the re­ published in the F ederal R egister. One sons are referred to the application on quest. At any time after said date, as copy of such protest must be served on file with the Commission for a full state­ provided by Rule 0-5 of the rules and the applicant, or its authorized repre­ ment of the representations made there­ regulations under the Act, an order dis­ sentative, if any, and the protests must in, which are summarized below. posing of the application herein may be certify that such service has been made. As of December 31, 1966 Trust owned issued by the Commission upon the basis The protest must be specific as to the 309,820 shares, or slightly less than 10 of the information stated in the applica­ service which such protestant can and percent, of the capital stock of . Great tion, unless an order for hearing upon the will offer, and must consist of a Signed American. Such ownership has not application shall be issued upon request original and six copies. changed materially since that date. or upon the Commission’s own motion. A copy of the application is on file, and Great American is therefore an affiliated Persons who request a hearing or advice can be examined at the Office of the Sec­ person of Trust within the meaning of as to whether a hearing is ordered, will retary, Interstate Commerce Commis­ section 2(a)(3) of the Act. Trust also receive notice of further developments in sion, Washington, D.C. and also in the

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 NOTICES 7605 field office to which protests are to be Teichert, District Supervisor, Bureau of Successively filed letter-notices of the transmitted. Operations, Interstate Commerce Com­ same carrier under the Commission’s mission, Room 1621, 51 Southwest First Motor Carriers of P roperty Deviation Rules Revised, 1957, will be Avenue, Miami, Fla. 33130. numbered consecutively for convenience No. MC 493 (Sub-No. 4 TA), filed No. MC 123067 (Sub-No. 60 TA), filed in identification and protests if any May 17, 1967. Applicant: HYMAN MO­ May 17, 1967. Applicant: M & M TANK should refer to such letter-notices by TOR SERVICE CO., 425 South 6th LINES, INC., Post Office Box 4174, North number. Street, Quincy, HI. 62301. Applicant’s Station, Winston-Salem, N.C. 27105. Ap­ representative: R. W. Burgess, 8514 plicant’s^ representative: Frank C. Motor Carriers of P roperty Midland Boulevard, St. Louis, Mo. 63114. Philips, Post Office Box 612, Winston- No. MC 30504 (Deviation No. 6), Authority sought to operate as a com­ Salem, N.C. 27102. Authority sought to TUCKER FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1415 mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over regu­ operate as a common carrier, by motor South Olive Street, South Bend, Ind. lar routes, transporting: General com­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ 46621, filed May 5,1967. Carrier proposes modities (except those of unusual value, ing: Olivine, dry, in bulk, in tank vehicles, to operate as a common carrier, by motor classes A and B explosives, household from points in Jackson County, N.C., to vehicle, of general commodities, with goods, commodities in bulk, and those points in Alabama, Georgia, Pennsyl­ certain exceptions, over a deviation route requiring special equipment), serving vania, and Tennessee, for 180 days. Sup­ as follows: From Bristol, Ind., over Indi­ the plantsite of Missouri Farmers Asso­ porting Shipper: E. J. Lavino & Co., ana Highway 120 to junction Indiana ciation, Inc., adjacent to the Missouri Division of International Minerals & Highway 13, thence over Indiana High­ Electric Co-Operative, near Palmyra, Chemicals Corp., Throe Penn Center way 13 to junction U.S. Highway 131, Mo., as an off-route point in connection Plaza, Philadelphia, Pa. 19102. Send pro­ thence over U.S. Highway 131 to junc­ with applicant’s authorized regular-route tests to: Jack K. Huff, District Super­ tion U.S. Highway 12, and return over operations between Quincy, HI., and St. visor, Interstate Commerce Commission, the same route, for operating conven­ Louis, Mo., for 180 days. Supporting ship­ Bureau of Operations, Room 206, 327 ience only. The notice indicates that per: Missouri Farmers Association, Inc., North Tryon Street, Charlotte, N.C. the carrier presently authorized to trans­ 201 South Seventh, Columbia, Mo. 65201. 28202. port the same commodities, over a per­ Send protests to: Harold Jolliff, District No. MC 123393 (Sub-No. 182 TA), filed tinent service route as follows: From Supervisor, Interstate Commerce Com­ May 17, 1967. Applicant: BILYEU RE­ Elkhart, Ind., over Indiana Highway 120 mission, Bureau of Operations, Room FRIGERATED TRANSPORT CORPO­ to junction Indiana Highway 15, thence 476, 325 West Adams Street, Springfield, RATION, 2105 East Dale, Post Office Box over Indiana Highway 15 to the Indiana- HI. 62704. 948, Commercial Station, Springfield, Michigan State line, thence over Mich­ No. MC 114301 (Sub-No. 48 TA), Mo. 65803. Applicant’s representative: igan Highway 103 (formerly portion U.S. filed May 17, 1967. Applicant: DELA­ David D. Brunson, Post Office Box 671, Highway 131), to junction U.S. Highway WARE EXPRESS CO., a corporation, Oklahoma City, Okla. 73102. Authority 12 (formerly portion U.S. Highway 112), Post Office Box 97, Elkton, Md. 21921. sought to operate as a common carrier, thence over U.S. Highway 12 to Somer­ Applicant’s representative: Chester A. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, set Center, Mich., thence over unnum­ Zyblut, 1522 K Street NW., Washington, transporting: Foodstuffs, from La Porte, bered highway (formerly portion U.S. D.C. 20005. Authority sought to operate Ind., to points in Missouri, Arkansas, Highway 127) to Jackson, Mich., and re­ as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Oklahoma, and Kansas, for 180 days. turn over the same route. over irregular routes, transporting: In­ Supporting shipper: American .Home No. MC 33641 (Deviation No. 4), IML edible tallow, in bulk, from Berlin, Md., Foods, Division of American Home Prod­ FREIGHT, INC., Post Office Box 2277, to points in Delaware, Virginia,. West ucts Corp., 685 Third Avenue, New York, Salt Lake City, Utah 84110, filed May 8, Virginia, New Jersey, and Pennsylva­ N.Y. 10017. Send protests to: John V. 1967. Carrier’s representative: Marshall nia (except those points in New Jersey Barry, District Supervisor, Interstate G. Berol, 100 Bush Street, San Francisco, and Pennsylvania located within 100 Commerce Commission, Bureau of Oper­ Calif. 94104. Carrier proposes to operate miles of Columbus Circle, N.Y.), and the ations, 1100 Federal Office Building, 911 as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, District of Columbia, for 150 days. Sup­ Walnut Street, Kansas City, Mo. 64106. of general commodities, with certain ex­ porting shipper: Ralston Purina Co., ceptions, over a deviation route as fol­ Checkerboard Square, Saint Louis, Mo. By the Commission. lows: From junction U.S. Highway 93 63199 (Roy H. Shipley, Poultry Prod­ [seal] H. N eil Garson, and Interstate Highway 80N, north of ucts Division, Traffic Manager). Send Secretary. Twin Falls, Idaho, over Interstate High­ protests to: Paul J. Lowry, District Su­ way 80N to junction Interstate Highway [F.R. Doc. 67-5768; Filed, May 23, 1967; 15W, thence over Interstate Highway pervisor, Bureau of Operations, Inter­ 8:48 am.] state Commerce Commission, 206 Old 15W to junction Interstate Highway 15, Post Office Building, Salisbury, Md. thence over Interstate Highway 15 to 21801. [Notice 447] Pocatello, Idaho, and return over the same route, for operating convenience No. MC 118290 (Sub-No. 5 TA), filed MOTOR CARRIER ALTERNATE ROUTE only. The notice indicates that the car­ May 17, 1967. Applicant: EDWARD F. DEVIATION NOTICES rier is presently authorized to transport PULLER, doing business as EDDIE FUL­ the same commodities, over pertinent LER, 2180A Northwest 23d Street, Miami, May 19,1967. service routes as follows: (1) From Pla. 33142. Applicant’s representative: The following letter-notices of pro­ Weiser, Idaho, over U.S. Highway 95 via Joe G. Fender, 802 Houston First Savings posals to operate over deviation routes Payette, Idaho, to Fruitland, Idaho, Building, Fannin at Capital, Houston, for operating convenience only have been thence over U.S. Highway 30 to Ontario, Tex. 77002. Authority sought to operate filed with the Interstate Commerce Com­ Oreg., thence over U.S. Highway 26 via as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, mission, under the Commission’s Devia­ Nyssa, Oreg., to junction U.S. Highway over irregular routes, transporting: tion Rules Revised, 1957 (49 CFR 211.1 20, thence over U.S. Highway 20 via Groceries, not frozen, requiring refriger­ (c) (8) ) and notice thereof to all inter­ Parma and Notus, Idaho, to junction U.S. ation in transit, from Miami, West Palm ested persons is hereby given as pro­ Highway 30, thence over U.S. Highway Beach, and Tampa, Fla., to Houston and vided in such rules (49 CFR 211.1(d) 30 via Nampa, Meridian, Boise, Moun­ Dallas, Tex., and Los Angeles and San (4)). tain Home, and Glenns Ferry, Idaho, to Francisco, Calif., for 180 days. Support­ Protests against the use of any pro­ Bliss, Idaho, thence over Idaho High­ ing Shippers: Miavana Wholesale Co.. posed deviation route herein described way 24 via Gooding, Idaho, to Shoshone, Lie., 1031 Northwest 21st Street, Miami, may be filed with the Interstate Com­ Idaho, thence over U.S. Highway 93 to Pla. 33137; West Indies Food & Packing, merce Commission in the manner and Twin Falls, Idaho (also from Bliss over *nc., 2149 Northwest 10th Avenue, Miami, form provided in such rules (49 CFR 211.1(e) ) at any time, but will not oper­ U.S. Highway 30 via Buhl and Filer to Pla. 33152; and N. Polanco, Inc., 2177 ate to stay commencement of the pro­ Twin Falls), thence over U.S. Highway Northwest Eighth Avenue, Miami, Fla. posed operations unless filed within 30 30 to Burley, Idaho, thence over U.S. 33127. Send protests to: Joseph B. days from the date of publication. Highway 30S via Malta and Strevell,

No. loo----- 7 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7606 NOTICES

Idaho, and Snowville, Tremonton, and Shoals, Ind., to Cincinnati, Ohio, thence quests for procedural information, in­ Bear River City, Utah, to Brigham City, over U.S. Highway 25 (or Ohio Highway cluding the time for filing protests, con­ Utah, (2) from Pocatello, Idaho, over 4) to Dayton, Ohio, and return over the cerning this application should be ad­ U.S. Highway 30N to Montpelier, Idaho, same route. dressed to the Public Service Commission of Michigan, Lewis Cass Building, Lans­ (3) from Salt Lake City, Utah, over U.S. Motor Carrier of P assengers Highway 91 to Preston, Idaho, thence ing, Mich., and should not be directed to over Idaho Highway 34 to junction U.S. No. MC 1515 (Deviation No. 375) the Interstate Commerce Commission. Highway 30N, thence over U.S. Highway (Cancels Deviation No. 353), GREY­ N ote: The purpose of this republication 30N to Montpelier, Idaho (also, when HOUND LINES, INC. (Southern Divi­ is to add ‘‘and points within 2% miles Idaho Highway 34 is impassable due to sion) , 219 East Short Street, Lexington, thereof”, to the origin point of Saline, weather condition, from Preston over Ky. 40507, filed April 24, 1967, should be Mich. U.S. Highway 91 to junction U.S. High­ corrected to properly describe the access By the Commission. way 30N, thence over U.S. Highway 30N route as follows: From Cullman, Ala., to Montpelier), thence over U.S. High­ over U.S. Highway 278 to junction Inter­ [seal] H. N eil Garson, way 89 to Paris, Idaho, and (3) from state Highway 65. Published in the F ed­ Secretary. Afton, Wyo., over U.S. Highway 89 to eral R egister May 3, 1967. [F.R. Doc. 67-5770; Filed, May 23, 1967; Alpine, Wyo., thence over U.S. Highway By the Commission. 8:48 a.m .] 26 to junction U.S. Highway 191, thence [seal] H. N eil Garson, over U.S. Highway 191 to Pocatello, [Notice 1064] Idaho (also from Afton over U.S. High­ Secretary. way 89 to Geneva, Idaho, thence across [F.R. Doc. 67-5769; Filed, May 23, 1967; MOTOR CARRIER APPLICATIONS AND the Idaho-Wyoming State line to Wyo­ 8:43 a.m.] CERTAIN OTHER PROCEEDINGS ming Highway 89, thence over Wyoming Highway to Border, Wyo., thence over May 19, 1967. U.S. Highway 30N to Pocatello), and NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTOR CAR­ The following publications are gov­ return over the same routes. RIER INTRASTATE APPLICATIONS erned by Special Rule 1.247 of the Com­ No. MC 33641 (Deviation No. 5), IML mission’s rules of practice, published in FREIGHT, INC., Post Office Box 2277, May 19, 1967. the F ederal R egister issue of April 20, Salt Lake City, Utah 84110, filed May 8, The following applications for motor 1966, which became effective May 20, 1967. Carrier’s representative: Marshall common carrier authority to operate 1966. G. Berol, 100 Bush Street, San Francisco, in intrastate commerce seek concur­ The publications hereinafter set forth Calif. 94104. Carrier proposes to operate rent motor carrier authorization in in­ reflect the scope of the applications as as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, terstate or foreign commerce within filed by applicant, and may include de­ of general commodities, with certain ex­ the limits of the intrastate authority scriptions, restrictions, or limitations ceptions, over a deviation route as fol­ sought, pursuant to section 206(a) (6) which are not in a form acceptable to lows: From St. Louis, Mo., over Interstate of the Interstate Commerce Act, as, the Commission. Authority which ulti­ Highway 55 to Chicago, HI., and return amended October 15, 1962. These ap­ mately may be granted as a result of the over the same route, for operating rights plications are governed by Spe­ applications here noticed will not neces­ convenience only, restricted to shipments cial Rule 1.245 of the Commission’s sarily reflect the phraseology set forth moving to or from Denver, Colo., or rules of practice, published in the F ed­ in the application as filed, but also will points west thereof. The notice indicates eral R egister, issue of April 11, 1963, eliminate any restrictions which are not that the carrier is presently authorized page 3533, which provides, among other acceptable to the Commission. to transport the same commodities, over things, that protests and requests for A pplications Assigned for Oral Hearing pertinent service routes as follows: (1) information concerning the time and From Denver, Colo., over U.S. Highway place of State Commission hearings or MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY 36 to Smith Center, Kans., thence over other proceedings, any subsequent The below-listed applications are being U.S. Highway 281 to junction U.S. High­ changes therein, and any other related republished primarily to clarify the com­ way 24, thence over U.S. Highway 24 to matters shall be directed to the State modity description. In the applications Kansas City, Mo., thence over U.S. High­ Commission with which the application as originally published, it might have way 50 to St. Louis, Mo., and (2) from is filed and shall not be addressed to or appeared that applicants seek authority Chicago, HI., over Alternate U.S. High­ filed with the Interstate Commerce to transport iron and steel articles, in­ way 30 to junction U.S. Highway 30, Commission. cluding, but not limited to, the commodi­ thence over U.S. Highway 30 to Missouri State Docket No. C-13718 (Amend­ ties named in the original publications. Valley, Iowa, thence over Alternate U.S. ment), filed March 3, 1967, published The applicants, however, seek authority Highway 30 to Council Bluffs, Iowa, F ederal R egister issue of April 26, 1967, to transport only the specific commodi­ thence over U.S. Highway 6 to Hastings, amended May 10, 1967, and republished ties as set forth in the republication be­ Nebr., thence over U.S. Highway 34 to as amended this issue. Applicant PAUL low, which are made of iron or steel. The Brush, Colo., thence over U.S. Highway E. ARMS, doing business as SALINE restriction, “in bales or bundles, weigh­ 6 to Denver, Colo., and return over the CAB CO., 126 East Michigan, Saline, ing 2,000 pounds or more each, which same routes. Mich. 48176. Applicant’s representative: require the use of special equipment,” ap­ No. MC 33641 (Deviation No. 6), IML Wilhelmina Boersma, 1600 First Federal pearing in the applications, as filed, re­ FREIGHT, INC., Post Office Box 2277, Building, Detroit, Mich. 48226. Certif­ fers to the units that will make up a ship­ Salt Lake City, Utah 84110, filed May 8, icate of public convenience and necessity ment and not to the shipment itself. The 1967. Carrier’s representative: Marshall sought to operate a freight service as territorial authority sought by each ap­ G. Berol, 100 Bush Street, San Francisco, follows: Transportation of property, be­ plicant remains the same as that sought Calif. 94104. Carrier proposes to operate tween Saline and points within 2% in the applications as filed and originally as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, miles thereof, and Manchester, Mich., published. The public’s attention is di­ of general commodities, with certain ex­ and points within 1 mile thereof, on the rected to the Special Footnote imme­ ceptions, over a deviation route as one hand, and, on the other, points and diately following the republication of follows: From St. Louis, Mo., over Inter­ places within 65 miles thereof, limited to these applications. state Highway 70 to junction Interstate shipments weighing not more than 1,000 No. MC 4964 (Sub-No. 35) (Republica­ Highway 75, thence over Interstate High­ pounds, moving to a single consignee and tion) , filed February 27, 1967, published way 75 to Dayton, Ohio, and return over moving in taxicabs, sports wagons, panel, F ederal R egister issue of March 16. the same route, for operating conven­ or stake trucks. Both intrastate and in­ 1967. Applicant: ROY L. JONES, INC., ience only. The notice indicates that the terstate authority sought. 915 McCarthy Avenue, Post Office Box carrier is presently authorized to trans­ HEARING: Thursday, June 8,1967, at 24128, Houston, Tex. 77029. Applicant’s port the same commodities, over a per­ 9:30 a.m., Michigan Public Service Com­ representative: Austin L. Hatchell, 1102 tinent service route as follows: From mission, Lewis Cass Building, South Wal­ Perry Brooks Building, Austin, Tex. St. Louis, Mo., over U.S. Highway 50 via nut Street, Lansing, Mich. 48913. Re­ 78701.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 NOTICES 7607

No. MC 10881 (Sub-No. 5), filed Feb­ R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ R egister issue of March 16,1967. Appli­ ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal cant: GULF STATES TRUCK LINES, cant: HEARD & HEARD, INC., 115 East register issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ INC., 9101 Linwood Avenue, Post Office Vance, Post Office Box S, Refugio, Tex. cant: CANYON TRUCKING CO., a Box 6090, Shreveport, La. 71106. Appli­ 78377. Applicant’s representative: Ben­ corporation, Garden City Highway, Post cant’s representative: Jerry Pestridge, ton Coopwood, The 904 Lavaca Building, Office Box 3106, Midland, Tex. 79704. Post Office Box 1148, Austin, Tex. 78767. Austin, Tex. 78701. Applicant’s representative: Austin L. No. MC 30798 (Sub-No. 3), filed Feb­ No. MC 73165 (Sub-No. 231), filed Hatchell, 1102 Perry Brooks Building, ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal February 27, 1967, published F ederal Austin, Tex. 78701. R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ No. MC 13250 (Sub-No. 88), filed Feb­ cant: MILLER BROTHERS TRUCK cant: EAGLE MOTOR LINES, INC., 830 ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal LINE, INC., 901 Northeast 28th Street, North 33d Street, Post Office Box 1348, Register issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ Fort Worth, Tex. 76106. Applicant’s rep­ Birmingham, Ala. 35201. Applicant’s rep­ cant: J. H. ROSE TRUCK LINE, INC., resentative: Thomas E. James, The 904 resentative: Thomas E. James, The 904 5003 Jensen Drive, Post Office Box 16190, Lavaca Building, Austin, Tex. 78701. Lavaca Building, Austin, Tex. 78701. Houston, Tex. 77022. Applicant’s repre­ No. MC 31321 (Sub-No. 8), filed March No. MC 74321 (Sub-No. 30), filed Feb­ sentative Thomas E. James, The 904 20, 1967, published F ederal R egister ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ Lavaca Building, Austin, Tex. 78701. issue of April 6, 1967. Applicant: ister issue of March 23, 1967. Applicant: No. MC 18099 (Sub-No. 5), filed SOUTHWESTERN TRANSFER COM­ B. F. WALKER, INC., 650 17th Street, February 27, 1967, published F ederal PANY, INC., 1730 Bassett Avenue, Post Denver, Colo. 80202. Applicant’s repre­ Register issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ Office Box 1611, El Paso, Tex. 79948. Ap­ sentative: Jerry Prestridge, Post Office cant: ROLAND HELDT, AGNES MARIE plicant’s representative: Joe G. Fender, Box 1148, Austin, Tex. 78767. HELDT, HERTHA L. HELDT, AND 802 Houston First Savings Building, No. MC 77184 (Sub-No. 1), filed Feb­ ROLAND HELDT, AGNES MARIE Houston, Tex. 77002. ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ HELDT, HERTHA L. HELDT AND W. L. No. MC 32528 (Sub-No. 32), filed Feb­ ister issue of March 30, 1967. Applicant: POWELL, TRUSTEES FOR GRACE ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal PAT BAKER, LESLIE BAKER, AND ELAINE POGUE, MARY ANN DAVIS, R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ GLEN BAKER, a partnership, doing DIANA RUTH HELDT, AND DAVID cant: CECIL E. VALLEE, E. H. VALLEE, business as PAT BAKER AND SONS, MICHAEL HELDT, doing business as EFFIE VALLEE ALBAUGH, AND Post Office Box 475, Kingsbury, Tex. HELDT BROTHERS, Post Office Drawer HELEN VALLEE WITHERS, doing busi­ 78638. Applicant's representative: Aus­ 1130, Alice, Tex. Applicant’s representa­ ness as UNION CITY TRANSFER, 1295 tin L. Hatchell, 1102 Perry Brooks Build­ tive: Jerry Prestridge, Post Office Box Railroad Avenue, Beaumont, Tex. 77702. ing, Austin, Tex. 78701. 1148, Austin, Tex. 78767. Applicant’s representative: John H. No. MC 79999 (Sub-No. 3), filed No. MC 19227 (Sub-No. 116), filed Benckenstein, 1350 Petroleum Building, March 20, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ February 27, 1967, published F ederal Post Office Box 551, Beaumont, Tex. ister issue of April 6,1967. Applicant: E. Register issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ 77704. JACK WALTON TRUCKING COM­ cant: LEONARD BROS. TRUCKING No. MC 43867 (Sub-No. 19), filed PANY, a corporation, 13020 Sarah’s Lane, CO., INC., 2595 Northwest 20th Street, February 27, 1967, published F ederal also Post Office Box 9789, Houston, Tex. Post Office Box 52-602, Biscayne Annex, R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ 77015. Applicant’s representative: Joe Miami, Fla. 33152. Applicant’s represent­ cant: ALTON LEANDER MCALISTER, G. Fender, 802 First Houston Savings ative: Thomas E. James, The 904 Lavaca Post Office Box 2214, Wichita Falls, Tex. Building, Houston, Tex. 77002. Building, Austin, Tex. 78701. 76307. Applicant’s representative: James No. MC 83539 (Sub-No. 204) (Republi­ No. MC 22046 (Sub-No. 15), filed Feb­ W. Hightower, 136 Wynnewood Profes­ cation) , filed February 6, 1967, and pub­ ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal sional Building, Dallas, Tex. 75224. lished in F ederal R egister issues of Feb­ Register issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ No. MC 56887 (Sub-No. 8), filed ruary 24, 1967, and April 19, 1967. Appli­ cant: W. M. (BILLY) WALKER, INC., February 27, 1967, published F ederal cant: C & H TRANSPORTATION CO., 129 South Grimes Street, Hobbs, N. Mex. R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ INC., 1935 West Commerce Street, Dallas, 88240. Applicant’s representative: Jerry cant: JESS EDWARDS, INC., Post Office Tex. 75222. Applicant’s representative: Prestridge, Post Office Box 1148, Austin, Box 1091, Corpus Christ!, Tex. 78403. W. T. Brunson, 419 Northwest Sixth Tex. 78767. Applicant’s representative: Jerry Prest­ Street, Oklahoma City, Okla. 73102. No. MC 23618 (Sub-No. 12), filed ridge, Post Office Box 1148, Austin, Tex. No. MC 83835 (Sub-No. 54), filed Feb­ March 2, 1967, published F ederal 78767. ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R egis­ Register issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ No. MC 58311 (Sub-No. 15), filed ter issue of March 23, 1967. Applicant: cant: McAl is t e r t r u c k in g c o m ­ February 27, 1967, published F ederal WALES TRUCKING COMPANY, a cor­ pany, a corporation, Post Office Box R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ poration, Post Office Box 6186, Dallas, 2377, Abilene, Tex. 79604. Applicant’s cant: BALL BROS. TRUCKING COM­ Tex. 75222, also 905 Myers Road, Grand representative: Ewell H. Muse, Jr., 415 PANY, INC., 2330 East Main Street, Prairie, Tex. Applicant’s representative: Perry Brooks Building, Austin, Tex. Grand Prairie, Tex. 75050. Applicant’s James W. Hightower, 136 Wynnewood 78701. representative: James W. Hightower, 136 Professional Building, Dallas, Tex. 75224. No. MC 24583 (Sub-No. 13), filed Wynnewood Professional B u ild in g, No. MC 85557 (Sub-No. 3) (Republica­ March 20, 1967, published F ederal Dallas, Tex. 75224. tion) ,_ filed January 9, 1967, published Register issue of April 6,1967. Applicant: No. MC 60157 (Sub-No. 9), filed F ederal R egister issues of February 9, RODNEY STEWART & TROY February 27, 1967, published F ederal 1967, and April 12,1967. Applicant: PAUL STEWART, a partnership, doing business R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ MUSSLEWHITE, Post Office Box 847, as FRED STEWART COMPANY, 129 cant: C. A. WHITE TRUCKING COM­ Levelland, Tex. 79336. Applicant’s repre­ South Clay Street, Post Office Box 659, PANY, INC., 4641 Greenville Avenue, sentative: Alvin R. Allison, 719 Houston Magnolia, Ark. 71753. Applicant’s repre­ Dallas, Tex. 75206. Applicant’s repre­ Street, Levelland, Tex. 79336. sentative: Joe G. Fender, 802 Houston sentative: James W. Hightower, 136 No. MC 85715 (Sub-No. 5), filed Feb­ First Savings Building, Houston, Tex. Wynnewood Professional B u ild in g, ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal 77002. Dallas, Tex. 75224. R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ No. MC 27662 (Sub-No. 9), filed Feb­ No. MC 63792 (Sub-No. 12), filed cant: J. V. HARRISON TRUCK LINES, ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ February 27, 1967, published F ederal INC., Post Office Box 15057, Houston, Tex. ister issue of March 16,1967. Applicant: R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ 77020. Applicant’s representative: Don rL A- DAyIS TRANSPORT, INC., Post cant: TOM HICKS TRANSFER COM­ Felts, The 904 Lavaca Building, Austin, Office Box 9413, Beaumont Highway, PANY, INC., Post Office Box 283, Harvey, Tex. 78701. Houston, Tex. Applicant’s representa- La. 70058. Applicant’s representative: No. MC 85811 (Sub-No. 2), filed uve: Jerry Prestridge, Post Office Box Thomas E. James, The 904 Lavaca Build­ March 20, 1967, published F ederal H48, Austin Tex. 78767. ing, Austin, Tex. 78701. R egister issue of April 6,1967. Applicant: No. MC 29805 (Sub-No. 10), filed Feb- No. MC 72058 (Sub-No. 6), filed AMSCO TRANSPORTATION, INC., Uary 27,- 1967, published F ederal February 27, 1967, published F ederal 10560 Mykawa Road, Houston, Tex.

FEDERAt REGISTER, V O L 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7608 NOTICES

77048, also Post Office Box 14147, R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ No. MC 106644 (Sub-No. 78), filed Feb­ Houston, Tex. Applicant’s representative: cant: PATTERSON TRUCK LINE, INC., ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal Joe G. Fender, 802 Houston First Savings 600 Roosevelt Street, Post Office Box 70, R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ Building, Houston, Tex. 77002. Houma, La. Applicant’s representative: cant: SUPERIOR TRUCKING COM­ No. MC 93318 (Sub-No. 15), filed Thomas E. James, The 904 Lavaca Build­ PANY, INC., 2770 Peyton Road NW., Post March 2, 1967, published Federal ing, Austin, Tex. 78701. Office Box 17050, Chattahoochee Station, R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ No. MC 99365 (Sub-No. 3), filed Feb­ Atlanta, Ga. 30321. Applicant’s repre­ cant: JOE D. HUGHES, INC., Post Office ruary 27, 1967, published March 16, sentative: Thomas E. James, The 904 Box 2143, Houston, Tex. Applicant’s 1967. Applicant: SHORTY HALL RIG Lavaca Building, Austin, Tex. 78701. representative: Ewell H. Muse, Jr., 415 CO., INC., Post Office Box 2429, Odessa, No. MC 106775 (Sub-No. 22) (Correc­ Perry Brooks Building, Austin, Tex. Tex. 79760. Applicant’s representative: tion) , filed February 27, 1967, published 78701. George Fowler, 520 North Lee, Odessa, F ederal R egister issues of March 16, No. MC 93884 (Sub-No. 4), filed Tex. 79760. 1967, and March 23, 1967. Applicant: March 23, 1967, published F ederal No. MC 99753 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ ATLAS TRUCK LINE, INC., Post Office •Register issue of April 6, 1967. Appli­ ruary 27, 1967, published March 16, Box 9848, Houston, Tex. 77015. Appli­ cant: FRANK C. STRECH TRUCKING 1967. Applicant: CLYDE C. DENT, 106 cant’s representative: James W. High­ CO., Box 2082, 2728 East Pearl, Odessa, Knight Hurst, Ennis, Tex. Applicant’s tower, 136 Wynnewood Professional Tex. 79760. Applicant’s representative: representative: Albert G. Walker, 304 Building, Dallas, Tex. 75224. Dan Felts, The 904 Lavaca Building, Capital National Bank Building, Austin, No. MC 106941 (Sub-No. 4), filed Feb­ Austin, Tex. 78701. _ Tex. 78701. ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal No. MC 96719 (Sub-No. 2), filed No. MC 102162 (Sub-No. 4), filed R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ February 27, 1967, published F ederal March 23, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ cant: WILLIAM H. OTT, doing business R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ ister issue of April 12, 1967. Applicant: as TEXAS HOT SHOT COMPANY, 3815 cant: THRASHER TRUCKING COM­ RED ARROW HEAVY HAULING, INC., Irvington Boulevard, Post Office Box PANY, a corporation, Post Office Box 116, Post Office Box 1897, San Antonio, Tex. 8587, Houston, Tex. 77009. Applicant’s Monahans, Tex. 79756. Applicant’s repre­ 78206. Applicant’s representative: Wal­ representative: Thomas E. James,. The sentative: Benton Coopwood, The 904 lace H. Nations, The 904 Lavaca Build­ 904 Lavaca Building, Austin, Tex 78701. Lavaca Building, Austin, Tex. 78701. ing, Austin, Tex. 78701. No. MC 107322 (Sub-No. 93), filed Feb­ No. MC 97068 (Sub-No. 6), filed No. MC 103066 (Sub-No. 24), filed ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal February 27, 1967, published F ederal February 27, 1967, published F ederal R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ cant: BELL TRANSPORTATION COM­ cant: H. S. ANDERSON TRUCKING cant: STONE TRUCKING COMPANY, PANY, a corporation, 1406 Hays Street, COMPANY, a corporation, Highway 69, a corporation, Post Office Box 2014, Post Office Box 8598, Houston, Tex. 77009. Post Office Box 3656, Port Arthur, Tulsa, Okla. 74101. Applicant’s repre­ Applicant’s representative: Thomas E. Tex. 77640. Applicant’s representative: sentative: Austin L. Hatchell, 1102 Perry James, The 904 Lavaca Building, Austin Thomas E. James, The 904 Lavaca Build­ Brooks Building, Austin, Tex. Tex. 78701. ing, Austin, Tex. 78701. No. MC 105984 (Sub-No. 8), filed Feb­ No. MC 107678 (Sub-No. 39), filed No. MC 97944 (Sub-No. 5), filed Feb­ ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ March 20, 1967, published F ederal ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal ister issue of March 23, 1967. Applicant: R egister issue of March 30, 1967. Appli­ R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ JOHN B. BARBOUR, JR., doing business cant: HILL & HILL TRUCK LINE, INC., cant: LANES BROTHERS TRUCKING as JOHN B. BARBOUR TRUCKING 13019 Sarah Lane, Post Office Box 9698, COMPANY, a corporation, Post Office COMPANY, Post Office Box 577, Iowa Houston, Tex. 77015. Applicant’s repre­ Box 1827, San Angelo, Tex. 76902. Appli­ Park, Tex. 76367. Applicant’s representa­ sentative: Joe G. Fender, 802 Houston cant’s representative: Austin L. Hatchell, tive: James W. Hightower, 136 Wynne- First Savings Building, Houston, Tex. 1102 Perry Brooks Building, Austin, Tex. wood Professional Building, Dallas, Tex. 77002. 78701. 75224. No. MC 107993 (Sub-No. 14), filed Feb­ No. MC 98289 (Sub-No. 2), filed April No. MC 106407 (Sub-No. 23), filed Feb­ ruary 27, 1967, published March 16, 19, 1967, published F ederal R egister ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ 1967. Applicant: J. J. WILLIS TRUCK­ issue of May 4, 1967. Applicant: RITE­ ister issue of March 23,1967. Applicant: ING COMPANY, a corporation, Post WAY TRANSPORT, INC., 4030 East T. E. MERCER TRUCKING, CO., a cor­ Office Box 2112, Odessa, Tex. 79760. Magnolia, Post Office Box 12163, Phoenix, poration, Post Office Box 1809, Fort Applicant’s representative: Thomas E. ^Vx*iz 85034 Worth, Tex. Applicant’s representative: James, The 904 Lavaca Building, Austin, No. MC 98334 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ Reagan Sayers, Century Life Building, Tex. 78701. ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal Post Office Drawer 17007, Fort Worth, No. MC 108942 (Sub-No. 4), filed Feb­ R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ Tex. 76102. ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal cant: INDUSTRIAL TRANSIT SERV­ No. MC 106497 (Sub-No. 36), filed R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ ICE, a corporation, 3203 Pluto, Dallas, April 13, 1967, published F ederal R egis­ cant: C. G. TODD TRUCKING COM­ Tex. 75212. Applicant’s representative: ter issue April 27, 1967. Applicant: PANY, a corporation, Post Office Box James W. Hightower, 136 Wynnewood PARKHILL TRUCK COMPANY, a cor­ 13734, Dallas, Tex., also 4828 West Professional Building, Dallas, Tex. 75224. poration, 4219 South Memorial, Tulsa, Illinois Avenue, Dallas, Tex. Applicant’s No. MC 98649 (Sub-No. 4), filed Okla. Applicant’s representative: Tom representative: James W. Hightower, 136 February 27, 1967, published F ederal B. Kretsinger, 450 Professional Building, Wynnewood Professional Building, R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ Kansas City, Mo. 64106. Dallas, Tex. 75224. cant: BUCKALOO TRUCKING COM­ No. MC 106509 (Sub-No. 20), filed No. MC 109064 (Sub-No. 16), filed Feb­ PANY, a corporation, Post Office Box March 2, 1967, published F ederal R egis­ ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal 570, Kenedy, Tex. 78119. Applicant’s rep­ ter issue of March 23, 1967. Applicant: R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ resentative: Austin L. Hatchell, 1102 YOUNGER TRANSPORTATION, INC., cant: TEX-O-KA-N TRANSPORTA­ Perry Brooks Building, Austin, Tex. Post Office Box 14066, Houston, Tex. TION COMPANY, INC., Post Office Box 78701. 77021. Applicant’s representative: Ewell 8367, 3301 Southeast Loop 820, Fort No. MC 98868 (Sub-No. 3), filed H. Muse, Jr., 415 Perry Brooks Building, Worth, Tex. 76112. Applicant’s repre­ February 27, 1967, published F ederal Austin, Tex. 78701. sentative: Reagan Sayers, Century Life R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ No. MC 106623 (Sub-No. 10), filed Feb­ Building, Post Office Drawer 17007, Fort cant: R. R. KENNEDY TRUCKING, ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R egis­ Worth, Tex. 76102. INC., Post Office Drawer K, McCamey, ter issue of March 16, 1967. Applicant: No. MC 110817 (Sub-No. 13), filed Tex. 79752. Applicant’s representative: SOUTHWEST OILFIELD TRANSPOR­ February 27, 1967, published F ederal Jerry Prestridge, Post Office Box 1148, TATION CO., a corporation, Post Office R egister issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ Austin, Tex. 78767. Box 7427, Houston, Tex. 77008. Appli­ cant: E. L. FARMER & COMPANY, a No. MC 99214 (Sub-No. 4), filed Feb­ cant’s representative: Jerry Prestridge, corporation, 300 South Grant, Post Office ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal Post Office Box 1148, Austin, Tex. 78767. Box 3512, Odessa, Tex. Applicant’s rep-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 NOTICES 7609 resentative: Jerry Prestridge, Post Office No. MC 120228 (Sub-No. 3) , filed Feb­ Albert G. Walker, 304 Capital National Box 1148, Austin, Tex. 78767.* ruary 27,1967, published March 16,1967. Bank Building, Austin, Tex. 78701. No. MC 111412 (Sub-No. 6), filed Feb­ Applicant: TRANS WESTERN AIR­ No. MC 128949, filed March 20, 1967, ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal PORT, INC., Post Office Box 490, 1111 published F ederal R egister issue of register issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ Redondo Avenue, Odessa, Tex. 79760. April 13, 1967. Applicant: BIGGS OF cant: J. I. HAILEY, INC., Navigation Applicant’s representative: Reagan Say­ TEXAS, INC., 8110 La Porte Road, Hous­ Boulevard, Post Office Box 1919, Corpus ers, Century Life Building, Post Office ton, Tex. 77012. Applicant’s representa­ Christi, Tex. 78403. Applicant’s repre­ Drawer 17007, Fort Worth, Tex. 76102. tive: Joe G. Fender, 802 Houston First sentative: Jerry Prestridge, Post Office No. MC 120257 (Sub-No. 7), filed Feb­ Savings Building, Houston, Tex. 77002. Box 1148, Austin, Tex. 78767. ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ Authority sought to operate as a com­ No. MC 113459 (Sub-No. 40), filed ister issue of March 23, 1967. Applicant: mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over irreg­ February 27, 1967, published F ederal K. L. BREEDEN & SONS, INC., 410 ular routes, transporting: (1) The fol­ Register issue of March 23, 1967. Appli­ Alamo Street, Terrell, Tex. Applicant’s lowing iron or steel articles to wit: Plates, cant: H. J. JEFFRIES TRUCK LINE, representative: James W. Hightower, 136 posts, angles, forms, sheets, rounds, INC., Post Office Drawer 94850, Okla­ Wynnewood Professional Building, Dal- channels, beams, ingots, piling, billets, homa City, Okla. 73109. Applicant’s rep­ I q q 11 'pv 7^994. blooms, reinforcing rods, bars, wire mesh resentative: James W. Hightower, 136 No. MC 120316 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ and pipe, in bales or bundles, weighing Wynnewood Professional Building, Dal­ ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ 2,000 pounds or more each, which require las, Tex. 75224. ister issue of March 16, 1967. Applicant: the use of special equipment; and (2) the No. MC 115186 (Sub-No. 6), filed Feb­ WALTON TRANSPORTATION COM­ following iron or steel articles to wit: ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R egis­ PANY, INC., 13020 Sarah’s Lane, Post Sheets, beams, plates, and coils, weigh­ ter issue of March 23, 1967. Applicant: Office Box 9787, Houston, Tex. 77015. Ap­ ing 2,000 pounds or more each, requiring RAY E. RAMSEY, doing business as plicant’s representative: Joe G. Fender, the use of special equipment. RAMSEY TRUCKING COMPANY, 1273 802 Houston First Savings Buildings, S pecial F ootnote: The above repub­ Sheffield, Post Office Box 9631, Houston, Houston, Tex. 77002. lication reflects the scope of the applica­ Tex. 77015. Applicant’s representative: No. MC 120633 (Sub-No. 3), filed tions as filed by applicants. The Special Thomas E. James, The 904 Lavaca Build­ March 23, 1967, published F ederal Notice set forth above applies with re­ ing, Austin, Tex. 78701. R egister issue of April 6, 1967. Appli­ spect to this republication in the same No. MC 115603 (Sub-No. 9), filed Feb­ cant: SPECIALIZED CARRIERS INC., manner as to initial publication. ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ 310 South 12th Street, Waco, Tex. Appli­ ister issue of March 16, 1967. Applicant: cant’s representative: Wallace H. Na­ By the Commission. TURNER BROS. TRUCKING COM­ tions, The 904 Lavaca Building, Austin, [seal] H. Neil Garson, PANY, INC., 5501 South Hattie, Okla­ Tex. 78701. Secretary. homa City, Okla. 73109. Applicant’s rep­ resentative: James W. Hightower, 136 No. MC 120851 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ [F.R. Doc. 67-5771; Filed, May 23, 1967; Wynnewood Professional Building, Dal- ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal 8:48 a.m.] R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ loo rPpY 7^994 cant: BLASCHKE TRUCKING COM­ No. MC 119176 (Sub-No. 4), filed PANY, a corporation, 6242 Hurst, [Notice 1065] March 20, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ Houston, Tex. 77008. Applicant’s repre­ ister issue of March 30,1967. Applicant: MOTOR CARRIER APPLICATIONS AND THE SQUAW TRANSIT COMPANY, a sentative: James W. Hightower, 136 CERTAIN OTHER PROCEEDINGS corporation, 5121 South 49 West Avenue, Wynnewood Professional B u ild in g , Dallas, Tex. 75224. May 19,1967. Post Office Box 9415, Tulsa, Okla. 74107. Applicant’s representative: Joe G. Fend­ No. MC 121201 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ The following publications are gov­ er, 802 Houston First Savings Building, ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal erned by Special Rule 1.247 of the Com­ Houston, Tex. 77002. R egister issue of March 16, 1967. Appli­ mission’s rules of practice, published in No. MC 119774 (Sub-No. 8), filed Feb­ cant: L D. COOPER TRUCKING & the F ederal R egister issue of April 20, ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R egis­ CONTRACTING, INC., 7725 Parkhurst 1966, which became effective May 20, ter issue of March 23, 1967. Applicant: Street, Houston, Tex. 77028. Applicant’s 1966. MARY ELLEN STIDHAM, N. M. STID­ representative: Jerry Prestridge, Post The publications hereinafter set forth HAM, A. E. MANKINS, JAMES E. MAN- Office Box 1148, Austin, Tex. 78767. reflect the scope of the applications as KINS, SR., a partnership, doing business No. MC 121423 (Sub-No. 2), filed filed by applicant, and may include de­ as EAGLE TRUCKING COMPANY, Post March 20, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ scriptions, restrictions, or limitations Office Box 471, Kilgore, Tex. 75662. Ap­ ister issue of April 6, 1967. Applicant: which are not in a form acceptable to plicant’s representative: James W. High­ BOYD NAEGELI, INC., 1107 Jackson, the Commission. Authority which ulti­ tower, 136 Wynnewood Professional South Houston, Tex. 77587. Applicant’s mately may be granted as a result of the Building, Dallas, Tex. 75224. representative: Joe G. Fender, 802 applications here noticed will not neces­ No. MC 119897 (Sub-No. 10), filed Feb­ Houston First Savings Building, Houston, sarily reflect the phraseology set forth in ruary 27,1967, published March 16, 1967. Tex.77002. the application as filed, but also will Applicant: GREAT WESTERN MOTOR No. MC 121424 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ eliminate any restrictions which are not LINES, INC., Post Office Box 987, 4601 ruary 27, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ acceptable to the Commission. Avenue H, Rosenberg, Tex. 77471. Appli­ ister issue of March 23,1967. Applicant: Applications Assigned for Oral Hearing cant’s representative: George Fowler, 520 DAL-HAR DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, North Lee, Odessa, Tex. 79760. INC., 1517 Briarcrest, Dallas, Tex. 75224. MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY No. MC 119908 (Sub-No. 3), filed Applicant’s representative: James W. No. MC 125722 (Sub-No. 1) (Republi­ April 19, 1967, published F ederal R eg­ Hightower, 136 Wynnewood Professional cation) , filed February 3,1963, published ister issue May 11, 1967. Applicant: Building, Dallas, Tex. 75224. F ederal R egister issues of October 25, WESTERN LINES, INC., Post Office Box No. MC 128901, filed February 27,1967, 1963, and January 31, 1964, under MC- 1145,3523 North McCarty, Houston, Tex. published F ederal R egister issue of FC-65666, and republished this issue. <7001. Applicant’s representative: Clar­ March 16, 1967. Applicant: TEXAS Applicant: GREAT WESTERN PACK­ ence D. Todd, 1825 Jefferson Place NW., TRANSPORT, INC., 6637 West Com­ ERS EXPRESS, INC., 5151 York Road, Washington, D.C. 20036. merce Street, San Antonio, Tex. 78237. Post Office Box 16886, Denver, Colo. Ap­ No. MC 120031 (Sub-No. 2), filed Applicant’s representative: Benton Coop- plicant’s representative : Charles W. March 20, 1967, published April 6, 1967. wood, The 904 Lavaca Building, Austin, Singer, Tower Suite 3600, 33 North La Applicant: WOODARD TRUCKING Tex. 78701. Salle Street, Chicago, 111. 60602. In No. COMPANY, a corporation, 1620 Enid, No. MC 128908, filed February 27,1967, MC 125722 (Sub-No. 3) and No. MC X L ° fflce. Box 8647> Houston, Tex. published F ederal R egister issue of 125722 (Sub-No. 6), by a consolidated ' <009. Applicant’s representative: Joe G. March 23, 1967. Applicant: WALTER order entered March 30, 1965, the Com­ gender, 802 Houston First Savings Build- PITTS, INC., Post Office Box 14534, San mission, Operating Rights Board No. 1, mi, Houston, Tex. 77002. Antonio, Tex. Applicant’s representative: authorized the issuance to applicant of a FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7610 NOTICES certificate to transport meats, meat prod­ to the requirements of the Interstate further Amendment of Petitioner’s Cer­ ucts, meat byproducts and articles dis­ Commerce Act and the Commission’s tificate of Public Convenience and Ne­ tributed by meat packinghouses, as de­ rules and regulations thereunder. Be­ cessity) , filed April 17, 1967. Petitioner: scribed in sections A and C of appendix I cause it is possible that other parties, SMITH & SOLOMON TRUCKING to the report in Descriptions in Motor who have relied upon the notice of the COMPANY, a corporation, How Lane, Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209, 766, above-described applications, may have New Brunswick, N.J. Petitioner’s repre­ and dairy products, from Denver, Colo­ an interest in and would be prejudiced sentatives: Samuel W. Earnshaw, 833 rado Springs, and Pueblo, Colo., to by the lack of proper notice of the modi­ Washington Building, Washington, D.C. Phoenix, Tucson, and Prescott, Ariz., fication of said certificate in this Order, 20005, and Edward A. Martin, 1001 15th subject to the coincidental cancellation a notice of such modification will be pub­ Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20005. of that part of applicant’s certificate No. lished in the F ederal R egister and is­ Petitioner states it presently holds au­ MC 125722 (Sub-No. 1), dated Feb­ suance of a modified certificate will be thority in certificate No. MC 59264, one ruary 8, 1965, which authorized the withheld for a period of 30 days from segment of said certificate which reads transportation of packinghouse products the date of such publication, during as follows: “Ordnance and quartermas­ and dairy products; and that, pursuant which period any proper party in interest ter supplies, subject to certain restric­ to the said order, certificate No. MC may file an appropriate petition for leave tions, for U.S. Government only, between 125722 (Sub-No. 1), dated June 1, 1965, to intervene in this proceeding setting Raritan Arsenal, Nixon, N.J., and points was issued to applicant, superseding and forth in detail the precise manner in in Philadelphia County, Pa., on the one canceling certificate No. MC 125722 which it has been so prejudiced. hand, and, on the other, all military (Sub-No. 1), dated February 8, 1965, as posts, forts, and reservations, naval modified by the said order. Notice of F iling of Petitions bases, and ports of embarkation in New Certificate No. MC 125722 (Sub-No. 1), No. MC 42487 (Sub-No. 578) (Notice York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massa­ dated February 8, 1965, authorized of Filing of Petition for Interpretation chusetts, Rhode Island, Maine, Pennsyl­ among other things the transportation of of Certificate), filed April 25, 1967. Peti­ vania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, packinghouse products and dairy prod­ tioner: CONSOLIDATED FREIGHT- and the District of Columbia.” Petitioner ucts from Denver, Colo., to Tucson, Ariz., WAYS CORPORATION OF DELA­ further states that since the grant of this over a described regular route, serving WARE, Menlo Park, Calif. Petitioner’s segment in its original grandfather au­ the intermediate points of Colorado representatives: Eugene T. Liipfert and thority in a certificate issued March 21, Springs and Pueblo, Colo., and Prescott Ronald B. Natalie, 1035 Universal Build­ 1941, continuous efforts were made by and Phoenix, Ariz.; and that the purpose ing North, 1875 Connecticut Avenue petitioner and resultant action taken by of the applications in No. MC 125722 NW„ Washington, D.C. 20009. Petitioner the Commission to revise and perfect (Sub-Nos. 3 and 6), was to convert appli­ states that it holds authority to trans­ the language of this segment so as to cant’s regular-route authority as to pack­ port general commodities, in No. MC carry out the original purpose and intent inghouse products and dairy products 42487 Sub 578 Part B which reads, in under changed and changing circum­ into corresponding irregular-route au­ part, “Between Evansville, Ind., and stances and conditions, so as to enable thority. By petition filed April 6, 1967, Vincennes, Ind., serving no intermediate petitioner to operate a full, complete, applicant submitted additional informa­ points, from Evansville over U.S. High­ and responsive service in implementa­ tion indicating that it did not intend to way 41 to Vincennes and return over tion of the public need for its specialized convert to irregular-route authority that the same route.” The regular route au­ service and operation as to ordnance and portion of its regular-route authority thority is subject to the following re­ quartermaster supplies. from Denver to Pueblo, Colo., but that striction: “Service is not authorized The .situation involving transportation through inadvertance such intention was * * * (2) between points in Indiana of ordnance and quartermaster supplies not brought to the attention of the Com­ * * *.” Also contained in Sub 578, Part in the area involved in the interest of mission, or interested parties, at the time B, is a route between Boston and St. the U.S. Government has again changed, of filing such applications; therefore, ap­ Louis, Mo., with Vincennes as an inter­ very drastically. The Raritan, N.J., Ar­ plicant seeks modification of certificate mediate point. Petitioner states that it senal has been abandoned and is no' No. MC 125722 (Sub-No. 1), dated June 1, holds no authority at Evansville other longer a Government facility, and many 1965, so as additionally to authorize the than that described. Thus, the only way of the former military forts, posts, and transportation, over regular routes, of in which it can serve Evansville is by reservations have been changed or dis­ packinghouse products and dairy prod­ operating over the Vincennes-Evansville continued. The production and handling ucts, from Denver, Colo., to Pueblo, Colo., route which dead ends at Evansville; that of the commodities concerned is now over U.S. Highway 85, serving the inter­ the restriction against service between handled primarily through commercial mediate point of Colorado Springs, Colo. points in Indiana precludes the origina­ facilities, although the basic interest of A Supplemental Order of the Commis­ tion or delivery of Evansville traffic at the Government remains and has a need sion, Operating Rights Board No. 1, dated Vincennes, as well as the interchange of that the same type service be performed. Evansville traffic at Vincennes; and that Petitioner’s present certificate restric­ May 9, 1967, and served May 15, 1967, if, however, the restriction is read as as modified, finds that while regular- tions are inconsistent with its effective precluding as well the tacking of the handling of such traffic under these route authority is sought in the subject Evansville-Vincennes route, at Vin­ petition, a grant of irregular-route au­ changed circumstances. The purpose of cennes, to the Boston-St. Louis route the instant petition is to request that thority as set forth below would be more of petitioner, the former route becomes appropriate in the present circumstances the pertinent segment of its operating meaningless and cannot be used for any authority in MC 59264, issued September and in view of the limited commodities purpose. By the instant petition, peti­ sought to be transported; compare 18,1962, be amended to read: “Ordnance tioner requests the Commission deter­ and quartermaster supplies, between Transportation Activities, Brady Trans­ mine that the restriction in Part B of its fer & Storage Co., 47 M.C.C. 23; and Nixon, N.J., and points in Philadelphia Sub 578 does not preclude tacking of its County, Pa., on the one hand, and, on Motor Common Carriers of Property— Evansville-Vincennes route at Vincennes Routes and Service, 88 M.C.C. 415. That the other, points in New York, New Jer­ and that it may transport traffic to and sey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode certificate No. MC 125722 (Sub-No. 1), from Evansville under the same condi­ Island, Maine, Pennsylvania, Delaware, dated June 1, 1965, be, and it is hereby, tions as it may to and from Vincennes. modified, by adding at Sheet 2, after the Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Any interested person desiring to par­ Columbia.” Note: The petition is accom­ restriction appearing at lines 15-18 ticipate may file an original and six panied by a verified letter from the De­ thereof, the following: Packinghouse copies of his written representations, partment of the Army, Headquarters products and dairy products, (1) from views, or argument in support of or U.S. Army Materiel Command, dated Denver, Colo., to Colorado Springs, and against the petition within 30 days from March 29, 1967, and a verified statement Pueblo, Colo., and (2) from Colorado the date of publication in the F ederal by Leon Smith, President of Petitioner, Springs, Colo., to Pueblo, Colo.; that ap­ R egister. both, in support of a change to conform plicant is fit, willing, and able properly No. MC 59264 (Petition for reopening to the new conditions. Any person desir­ to perform such service and to conform of Proceeding and for Clarification and ing to participate, may file an original

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 NOTICES 7611 and six copies of his written representa­ the Indiana-Ohio State line, including and Wisconsin; and meats, meat prod­ tions, views, or argument in support of, points on the designated portions of ucts, and meat byproducts and articles or against, the petition within 30 days the highways above described except distributed by meat packinghouses, as from the date of publication in the F ed­ Indianapolis and Peru, Ind., and points described in sections A and C of appendix e r a l R e g i s t e r . on U.S. Highway 24; and propellers, I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Applications U nder S ections 5 and from Piqua, Ohio, to points in Michigan Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 210a(b) on and west of U.S. Highway 27, and on 766 (except hides, and commodities in and south of U.S. Highway 16. GRAFF bulk), from Waterloo and Columbus The following applications are gov­ TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., is au­ Junction, Iowa, to points in Minnesota, erned by the Interstate Commerce Com­ thorized to operate as a common carrier with restrictions; and (2) general com­ mission’s special rules governing notice in Michigan, Kentucky, Missouri, Iowa, modities, excepting, among others house­ of filing of applications by motor carriers Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, and Wisconsin, hold goods and commodities in bulk, as of property or passengers under sections Application has been filed for temporary a common carrier, over irregular routes, 5(a) and 210a(b) of the Interstate Com­ authority under section 210a(b). between Waterloo and Oelwein, Iowa, merce Act and certain other proceedings No. MC-F-9749. Authority sought for on the one hand, and, on the other, Min­ with respect thereto. (49 CFR 1.240). purchase by JOE HODGES TRANS­ neapolis and St. Paul, Minn., between St. MOTOR CARRIERS OP PROPERTY PORTATION CORPORATION, Post Of­ Paul, Minn., on the one hand, and, on fice Box 82397, Oklahoma City, Okla., of the other, South St. Paul and Newport, No. MC-F-9748. Authority sought for a portion of the operating rights of LEE Minn., between certain specified points control and merger by GRAFF TRUCK­ WAY MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., 3000 in Minnesota. KROBLIN REFRIG­ ING COMPANY, INC., 2110 Lake Street, West Reno, Post Office Box 82488, Okla­ ERATED XPRESS, INC., is authorized Kalamazoo, Mich. 49005, of the operating homa City, Okla., and for acquisition to operate as a common carrier in New rights and property of BELL MOTOR by GEORGE T. PEW, 231 Chisholm Hill York, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Florida, FREIGHT, INC., 2135 Olmstead Road, Road, Haverford, Pa., of control of such New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Okla­ Kalamazoo, Mich. 49001, and for acqui­ rights through the purchase. Applicants’ homa, California, Wisconsin, Kansas, sition by THOMAS B. WOODWORTH, attorneys: Leroy Hallman, 4555 First Na­ Virginia, Nebraska, Minnesota, Colo­ SR., U Avenue, West, Schoolcraft, Mich., tional Bank Building, Dallas, Tex., and rado, Maryland, Massachusetts, South and FREDERICK J. BUCKHOUT, 5803 Richard H. Champlin, Post Office Box Carolina, Texas, Missouri, Indiana, Ar­ North 16th Street, Kalamazoo, Mich., of 82488, Oklahoma City, Okla. Operating kansas, Delaware, Maine, New Hamp­ control of such rights and property rights sought to be transferred: General shire, Vermont, Connecticut, Rhode Is­ through the transaction. Applicants’ at­ commodities, except those of unusual land, West Virginia, North Dakota, Ala­ torneys: John M. Veale, 1 Woodward value, classes A and B explosives, house­ bama, Tennessee, South Dakota, Louisi­ Avenue, Detroit, Mich. 48226, and Leon­ hold goods, as defined by the Commis­ ana, Mississippi, Kentucky, Wyoming, ard D. Verdier, Jr., 1 Vanderberg Center, sion, commodities in bulk, and those re­ North Carolina, and the District of Co­ Grand Rapids, Mich. 49502. Operating quiring special equipment, as a common lumbia; and TAKIN BROS. FREIGHT rights sought to be controlled and carrier, over regular routes, between LINE, INC., is authorized to operate as a merged: General commodities, except Lawton, Okla., and Wichita Falls, Tex. common carrier in all points in the those of unusual value, and except dan­ Vendee is authorized to operate as a com­ United States (excepting Colorado, gerous explosives, intoxicating beverages, mon carrier in Oklahoma and Texas. Ap­ Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, household goods as defined in Practices plication has not been filed for temporary South Dakota, Utah, Washington and of Motor Common Carriers of Household authority under section 210a(b). Wyoming). Application has been filed Goods, 17 M.C.C. 467, commodities in No. MC-F-9750. Authority sought for for temporary authority under section bulk, commodities requiring special (1) control and merger by KROBLIN 210a(b). Note: MC-87909 Sub-No. 9 is equipment, and those injurious or Con­ REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., Post a matter directly related. taminating to other lading, as a common Office Box 5000, 2125 Commercial Street, No. MC-F-9751. Authority sought for carrier, over regular routes, between Waterloo, Iowa, of the operating rights purchase by HENNIS FREIGHT LINES, Chicago, HI., and Grand Rapids, Mich., and property of ARROW MOTOR INC., Post Office Box 612, Winston- serving all intermediate and the off- FREIGHT LINE, INC., 498 First Avenue Salem, N.C. 27102, of a portion of the route point of Fennville, Mich.; com­ NW., New Brighton, Minn., and (2) pur­ operating rights of A-P-A TRANSPORT modities as specified above, for operating chase by TAKIN BROS. FREIGHT LINE, CORP., 2110 85th Street, North Bergen, convenience only, between Grand Rapids, INC., Post Office Box 5000, 2125 Com­ N.J. 07047, and for acquisition by S. H. Mich., to Benton Harbor, Mich., serving mercial Street, Waterloo, Iowa, of a por­ MITCHELL, also of Winston-Salem, no intermediate points; paper, paper tion of the operating rights of ARROW N.C., of control of such rights through products, and paper manufacturing ma­ MOTOR FREIGHT LINE, INC., 498 First the purchase. Applicants’ attorneys and chinery and parts thereof, and paper Avenue NW., New Brighton, Minn., and representative, respectively: James E. mill supplies, oVer irregular routes, be­ for acquisition by ALLEN E. KROBLIN, Wilson, 1735 K Street NW., Washington, tween points in Michigan on and west of MILDRED E. KROBLIN, both of 104 D.C. 20006, Herbert Burstein, 160 Broad­ rif’ ^tehway 27 and on and south of Lillian Lane, Waterloo, Iowa, and way, New York, N.Y. 10038, and Frank u.S. Highway 16, on the one hand, and, LOYAL H. FRISCH, 3018 West Ninth C. Philips, Post Office Box 612, Winston- on the other, certain specified points in Street, Waterloo, Iowa, of control of such Salem, N.C. Operating rights sought to be Ohio, and Huntington, W. Va., points in rights and property through the trans­ transferred: General commodities, ex­ Indiana on and east of U.S. Highway 31 action. Applicants’ attorneys: Stockton, cepting, among others, household goods and on and north of U.S. Highway 52, Lewis and Mitchell, The 1650 Grant and commodities in bulk, as a common and certain specified points in Ohio, and Street Building, Denver, Colo. 80203. Op­ carrier, over irregular routes, between those in Ohio and Kentucky within 10 erating rights sought to be (1) con­ points in Union County, N.J., on the one miles of Cincinnati, Ohio; paper labels, trolled and merged and (2) transferred: hand, and, on the other, points in New from Cincinnati, Ohio, to Sparta, Mich.; (1) General commodities, excepting, York east and south of a line beginning Printing paper, from Watervliet, Mich., among others, household goods and com­ at the New York-Pennsylvania State line to Blanchester, Ohio; magazines, from modities in bulk, as a common carrier, and extending along New York High­ Dayton and Springfield, Ohio, to Sparta, over irregular routes, from points in way 7 to the New York-Vermont State Mich and certain specified points in Black Hawk County, Iowa, to Waterloo, line, including points on the indicated Michigan; jute, jute fiber, and carpet Iowa, from Waterloo, Iowa, to certain portion of the highway specified. Vendee cushion linings, from Franklin, Ohio, to specified points in Iowa; malt beverages, is authorized to operate as a common Points in that portion of Indiana lying from Minneapolis, Minn., and La Crosse, carrier in Georgia, South Carolina, on and north of U.S. Highway 52 from Wis., to certain specified points in Iowa; North Carolina, Virginia, Michigan, ne Indiana-Ohio State line to Indianap­ household goods as defined by the Com­ Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Maryland, New olis, Ind., on and east of U.S. Highway 31 mission, between certain specified points York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, West M anapolis to Peru, Ind., and in Iowa, on the one hand, and, on the Virginia, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, south of U.S. Highway 24 from Peru to other, points in Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, Florida, Delaware, Missouri, Wisconsin,

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 32, NO. 100— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 7612 NOTICES Kentucky, Alabama, Connecticut, and Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, in Missouri, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, the District of Columbia. Application has Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Vir­ Ohio, Texas, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, not been filed for temporary authority ginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Maine, New Arkansas, Iowa, Tennessee, Indiana, under section 210a (b). Hampshire, Vermont, Alabama, Florida, Wisconsin, Alabama, Kentucky, and No. MC-F-9752. Authority sought for Mississippi, Arizona, California, Nevada, Nebraska, between Overland, Mo., and purchase by DEAN VAN LINES, INC., Utah, Montana, Idaho, Oregon, Wash­ points in that part of Missouri and 18420 South Santa Fe Avenue, Post Office ington, and the District of Columbia. Ap­ Illinois within 35 miles of Overland, on Box 923, Long Beach, Calif. 90801, of the plication has not been filed for temporary the one hand, and, on the other, points operating rights of PERRY MOVING & authority under section 210a(b). in Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, New York, STORAGE, INC., 14 West Roy Street, No. MC-F-9753. Authority sought for and the District of Columbia, between Seattle, Wash. 98109, and for acquisition purchase by WEATHERS BROS. points in Missouri, except Overland, Mo., by DEAN VAN & STORAGE, INC., and TRANSFER CO., INC., 2728 Northeast and points in Missouri within 35 miles DEAN INVESTMENT CO. and, in turn Freeway, Northeast, Atlanta, Ga. 30329, of Overland, on the one hand, and, on by A. E. DEAN, all also of Long Beach, of the operating rights of SWIFT VAN the other, points in Minnesota, Missis­ Calif., of control of such rights through AND STORAGE CO., 5200 South Topeka sippi, Colorado, New Jersey, Florida, the purchase. Applicants’ attorneys and Boulevard, Topeka, Kans., and for ac­ Georgia, Louisiana, New York, and the representative: Axelrod, Goodman, and quisition by R. L. WEATHERS, MRS. District of Columbia. Vendee is author­ Steiner, 39 South La Salle Street, W. W. WEATHERS, MRS. GLORIA ized to operate as a common carrier in Chicago, HI. 60603 and Phelix Woempner, DOBBS, all also of Atlanta, Ga., and Georgia, Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, 14 West Roy Street, Seattle, Wash. 98109. L. W. WEATHERS, 1268 Druid Park Av­ Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Operating rights sought to be trans­ enue, Augusta, Ga., of control of such Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, ferred: Household goods as defined by rights through the purchase. Applicants’ Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New the Commission, as a common carrier attorney: Robert J. Gallagher, 66 Central Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, over irregular routes between Seattle, Street, Wellesley, Mass. 02181. Operat­ Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Wash., and points within 25 miles of ing rights sought to be transferred: South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Connec­ Seattle, on the one hand, and, on the Household goods, as defined by the Com­ ticut, Tennessee, West Virginia, and the other, points in Washington, Oregon, and mission, as a common carrier over irreg­ District of Columbia. Application has Idaho. Vendee is authorized to operate as ular routes, between Overland, Mo., and been filed for temporary authority under a common carrier in Arkansas, Colorado, points within 35 miles of Overland, on section 210a(b). Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, the one hand, and, on the other, points Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, in Missouri, Illinois, Minnesota, Michi­ By the Commission. Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, gan, Mississippi, Indiana, Ohio, Tennes­ [seal] H. Neil Garson, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ne­ see, Pennsylvania, Arkansas, Iowa, Colo­ Secretary. braska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New rado, Kansas, Kentucky, and New Jersey, York, North Carolina, North Dakota, between points in Missouri and Illinois, [P.R. Doc. 67-5772; Piled, May 23, 1967; Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode on the one hand, and, on the other, points 8:49 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 32, NO. TOO— WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 1967 FEDERAI REGISTER 7613

CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— MAY The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during May.

3 CFR Page 7 CFR—-Continued Page 8 CFR— C o n tin u e d Page Proclamations: 1134------6835 Proposed Rules—Continued 3781-___ _— ______6757 1205------7068 299______3782 _— ______7167 1400------7583 312______3783 ______7169 1421------7246,7522 316a______3784 ______7203 1425______7123 334______Executive Orders: 1427------6967, 7386 337______9988 (see EO 11350) ______6961 1434------6967 339______10001 (see EO 11350)______6961 1483------6931 341______10008 (see EO 11350)______6961 1488------6836, 7437 343______10116 (see EO 11350)______6961 1821------7171 343a______10202 (see EO 11350)______6961 1823------7171 343b______10292 (see EO 11350)______6961 P roposed R ules: 349_____ 10363 (see EO 11350)______6961 33------7289 499______10659 (see EO 11350)______6961 52------6848 10714 (see EO 11350)______6961 725______7287 9 CFR 10984 (see EO 11350) ______6961 777______7337 7 1 ______11136 (amended by EO 11349) _ 6759 907 _I______7088 73______11007(see EO 11349)______6759 908 ______7089 83______11188 (see EO 11350)______6961 926______7089 94______11318 (amended by EO 11351) _ 7561 1004______7596 203______11349 ------6759 1012______7596 Proposed RtrLEs: 11350 ------6961 ,1013------7596 101______11351 ------7561 1030 ______6692 102______11352 ----- 7563 1031 ______6692 114______1038 ------'______6692 Presidential D ocuments Other 1 0 CFR Than P roclamations and Execu­ 1039 ______6692 tive Orders: 1040 ______7182 10______Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1045------6692 31 ______1967------7049 1051------6692 3 2 ______1060------6872, 7460 40______5 CFR 1063------6692, 7460, 7499 Proposed Rules: 1090—------7133 177------7052 * 25______1099______6978 26______213------6901, 6965, 7011, 7172, 7521 1101------7133 531------7246 1103------7338 95______550------66 74 1106------7090 1 2 CFR 1125 ------7025 7 CFR 1126 ______7090 10______18______— ------7171 1132------7090 215______l1--...... —------7011 509______28...... ™ __ 7011 8 CFR 541______"J------7565 336------7205 542______P roposed R ules: 547______100------6781 548______S------7437 101------6781 549______6770, 6773 HS-— ------7011 103------6781 550______IH...... — ------7385 204------6781, 6978 551______211 ------6781, 7025 566______of?------6965» 7054 212 ------6781 Proposed R ules: ------7011, 7521, 7581 213------• 6781 51------7385 214 ------6781 19______HI------7243 215 ------6781 263______221------6781 308...... Vi*...... 6930, 6966^211, 7491 223------6781 561______9?«------7211 231------6781 1 3 CFR qÎ"...... 6674, 6966, 7212, 7492 234 ------v ------6781 g ì ------7212 235 ---- 6781 121______7440, 7522 236 ------6781 Proposed Rules: Ann------7012, 7522 238 ------6781 121______944------— 75 82 239 ------_------6781 242 ------6781 1 4 CFR 243------V 6781 1------6905 1006_____ — 7888 245------*------6781 13— ------7584 1012 oioô 248 ------6781 23------6912,7586 10ß9------— 6835 249 ------,------6781 25------6912, 7587 251 ------6781 27------6914 252 ------6781 29------6914 i S ------: : :::::: : ::: S 253 ------6781 39------6674, 264------_---- 6781 6675, 6914, 6968, 6969, 7051, 7124, SS 292------6781 7205, 7247, 7248, 7391, 7442, 7443 7614 FEDERAL REGISTER

14 CFR—Continued Page 20 CFR page 32 CFR— Continued 43______:______7587 404______7332 1628------6973 61______-______6905, 7249405.______7126 1632.______6973 71______6676, 1690______7073 6837, 7014, 7124, 7125, 7250-7254, 21 CFR 1810______6932 7391, 7392, 7443, 7492, 7493, 7522, 2 ______I____ _ 6838 32A CFR 7587-7590. 3 ______7127 73______7014, 7015, 7125, 7392, 7393 8 ______6685, 7173 BDSA (Ch. VI): 75______7126, 7443, 7590 17 ______7496 M-11A...... 7207 77-______1____ 6970 19 ______7263 M-11A, Dir. 1------7208 91______6906, 7587 120 ______7173, 7522, 7523 M-11A, Dir. 2______7208 95______i______7448 1 2 1 ______6686, 97______6915, 7254, 7444 6775, 6970, 7127, 7174, 7263-7265, 33 CFR 103______7015 7394, 7458,7459, 7522-7524. 82___ 7127 135______6908 141c______6839 204___ 7594 151______— 6925 144______6970 401______6973 153______- __ 6925 146c______6839 171______7331 191______6839 221______;______7452 35 CFR 241______7591 P roposed R ules: 117—______.___ -______7022 1______7533 P roposed R ules: 3______7026 36 CFR 1______6938, 7219, 7220 8_.______i______6701 7______6932, 7333,'7594 39_____ 6845, 6983, 7396, 7460, 7598 20_____ 6938 311__ 6933 71______6845, 27______t____ 7342 6846,7133,7219, 7290-7292, 7397, 42______6844 P roposed R ules: 7461-7463,7599. 120 _ 6702 30______6978 73______7026, 7134, 7599 121 ______6844 251______6978 91______6938, 7219, 7220 131___ 7026 97______6938, 7219 38 CFR 121______6938, 7219 25 CFR 2—u___ _ 7127 135_____ 6938, 7219 6840 P roposed R ules: 3______137______7183 17______6841 207 ____ 7090 161______-______7287 208 ______7090 233______!______6714 26 CFR 39 CFR 241______7343 144______7438 1______6679, 6682, 6971, 7390 531______6973 243______6941 P roposed R ules: 288______7499 812______7265 1 — ______6691, 7080, 7337 822______7265 302____ 6714 301______7080 378______6847, 7134 P roposed R ules: 399____ 7499 28 CFR 132-______6701 15 CFR 0______r____ 6930 41 CFR 201 ______7131, 7312 202 ______7372 29 CFR 2 60__...... ___ 6974 8-1______■Bpfe-- 7267 230______7131, 7132, 7593 26______7206 R_9 ■BsF. 7267 P roposed R ules: 60______7594 8-3______■ ■ ■ 6974 12______7532465______6840 8 6 | P 7268 526______7390 8-7______i p - -7268 16 CFR P roposed R ules: 8-10______7269 13_____ 6676, 40_____ - ______7025 8-12 7269 6677, 6836, 6837, 6926-6928, 7015, 1604______^r______6941 8-52 H 7271 7016, 7206,7493, 7494. 1605 ______— 7092 8-75______—- ^ 7271 15______6929, 7262 9-2 y 7175 30 CFR 9-4 f e 7271 17 CFR 9-7 — 7175 45______7016 9-15 _ 7175 1__ *______7593 9-16 . 7278 P roposed R ules: 31 CFR 11 1 . 6974 270______7398, 739956— ______7496 11 7 . 6976,7208 82 ______%______7496 11 16 7073 18 CFR 93_____ 7496 50 204 . 7022 ___ 7494 60-2______7439 25______7495 32 CFR 101______6678 51______6777 42 CFR 141______6678 83 ______7175 35______6842 103____ 7175 260______— 7051, 7331 257______7019 P roposed R ules: 577— ______6931 ______7215 19 CFR 810_.__ 7020 l ______7262 819______7021 43 CFR 4______7390 840______7021 6683 13______6838 885______— 7440 P ublic Land Orders: 1457______6971 4152 (corrected) 6780 P roposed Rules 1464__ 6972 1______7499 1624______6973 P roposed R ules: 2244______7085 13______7080 1626 ______6973 7086 24______7337 1627 ______6973 3170— ______FEDERAL REGISTER 7615

Page 47 CFR Page 49 CFR Page 6684 2------6933 1______7497 7498 15------6933 103______7128 7333 73______6679, 195______6780 287______6685 6780, 7023, 7334, 7393, 7394, 7530 ______6843 81------6933 290 ______7128 85_____ 6933 291 ______.a______7128 89------7531 293 ______7129 7524 91------6937, 7531 294 ______7129 7054 93_^______7531 295 ______7130 95______7531 296 ______7130 7174 P roposed R ules: P roposed R ules: 7525 103______7134, 7185, 7600 7454 73 ______7092, 7344, 7397 74 ______7537 50 CFR 7457 87______7345 io______7497 7214 91______7537 32 ______7054 7282 97______6942 33 ______6685, 7024, 7131, 7394

KNOW ^ ^ ■ your GOVERNMENT U.S. GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION MANUAL

The United States Presents authoritative information about Government agencies (updated and republished annually). Government Describes the creation and authority, organization, and func­ Organization Manual tions of the agencies in the legislative, judicial, and executive is the official guide branches. to the functions of the This handbook is an indispensable reference tool for teachers, Federal Government librarians, scholars, lawyers, and businessmen who need cur­ rent official information about the U.S. Government.

$ 2 0 0 Per copy. Paperbound, with charts

Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.$. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.