DOCSLIB.ORG

2011 – Inventaire Entomologiques Et Herpétologique

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2011 – Inventaire Entomologiques Et Herpétologique Réserves Naturelles D’ILE-DE-FRANCE Inventaires entomologiques et herpétologiques ̶"NÞn`mq`"i¥opm`gg`"mÞbdji¥g`"_`"Ijdnnji ̶"Eiq`io¥dm`n"mÞ¥gdnÞn"k¥m"g¸KJB"`o"g¸KLEA"`i"2011 SOMMAIRE Partie 1 : Inventaire des Lépidoptères______________________________________________ 5 1. Méthodologie ____________________________________________________________________ 6 1.1. Méthodes d’échantillonnages utilisées_____________________________________________________ 6 1.2. Identifications et nomenclatures utilisées __________________________________________________ 8 2. Résultats de l’inventaire Rhopalocères ________________________________________________ 9 2.1. Espèces observées sur la Réserve ________________________________________________________ 9 2.2. Espèces d’intérêt commentées dans le cadre de l'étude ________________________________________ 9 3. Résultats du complément d’inventaire : Hétérocères (diurnes et nocturnes) _________________ 12 3.1. Espèces observées sur la Réserve ________________________________________________________ 12 3.2. Espèces d’intérêt commentées dans le cadre de l'étude _______________________________________ 12 3.3. Espèces d’intérêt patrimonial – enjeux patrimoniaux_________________________________________ 20 4. Analyse des résultats - bioévaluation ________________________________________________ 22 4.1. Rhopalocères________________________________________________________________________ 22 4.2. Hétérocères ________________________________________________________________________ 24 5. Propositions et mesures en faveur de la diversité des Lépidoptères_________________________ 25 5.1. Propositions spécifiques au site _________________________________________________________ 25 5.2. Diagnostic sur l’état de santé des espèces franciliennes _______________________________________ 31 Partie II : Inventaire des orthoptères _____________________________________________ 35 1. Objectifs de l’étude_______________________________________________________________ 36 1.1 Objectifs____________________________________________________________________________ 36 1.2 Matériel & méthodes __________________________________________________________________ 36 2. Recensement et localisation des espèces ______________________________________________ 37 3. Résultats _______________________________________________________________________ 38 3.1 Résultats globaux_____________________________________________________________________ 38 3.2 Espèces sensibles _____________________________________________________________________ 40 4. Espèces de fort intérêt patrimonial __________________________________________________ 41 4.1 Patrimonialité________________________________________________________________________ 41 4.2. Les espèces de fort intérêt patrimonial ____________________________________________________ 42 5. Gestion en faveur des Orthoptères __________________________________________________ 46 5.1. Mesures génériques___________________________________________________________________ 46 5.2. Mesures spécifiques __________________________________________________________________ 47 6. Conclusions ____________________________________________________________________ 48 Partie III : Inventaire des amphibiens ____________________________________________ 49 1. Objectif de l’étude _______________________________________________________________ 50 - 1 - 2. Méthodologie ___________________________________________________________________ 50 2.1. Recueil historique et documentaire_______________________________________________________ 50 2.2. Inventaire des amphibiens______________________________________________________________ 51 3. Les données existantes ___________________________________________________________ 53 4. Résultats des prospections _________________________________________________________ 55 4.1. Recensement et description des mares ____________________________________________________ 55 4.2. Résultats des prospections batrachologiques _______________________________________________ 56 4.3. Synthèse des observations 2011 _________________________________________________________ 58 4.4. Comparaison des observations effectuées en 2011 avec les données bibliographiques _______________ 58 4.5. Exigences écologiques des espèces présentes_______________________________________________ 59 4.6. Statut des espèces ____________________________________________________________________ 61 4.7. Bioévaluation des espèces______________________________________________________________ 61 4.8. Approche quantitative des populations ____________________________________________________ 62 4.9. Evaluation du succès de reproduction_____________________________________________________ 62 4.10. Répartition spatiale des espèces ________________________________________________________ 62 5. Essai de caracterisation des habitats d’espèce _________________________________________ 63 6. Atteintes pesant sur les populations d’amphibiens______________________________________ 64 7. Vulnérabilité des populations ______________________________________________________ 65 8. Dynamique possible d’évolution des habitats et des espèces ______________________________ 66 9. Suivi des habitats et des espèces ____________________________________________________ 66 9.1. Suivi de la végétation et des niveaux d’eau : _______________________________________________ 66 9.2. Suivi des populations d’amphibiens ______________________________________________________ 66 10. Actions à mener en faveur des amphibiens __________________________________________ 67 Partie 1V : Inventaire des reptiles ________________________________________________ 68 1. Méthodologie ___________________________________________________________________ 69 2. Etat des connaissances préalables___________________________________________________ 69 3. Implantation des plaques-abris _____________________________________________________ 70 4. Résultats des prospections de reptiles ________________________________________________ 74 4.1. Statut des espèces présentes ____________________________________________________________ 74 4.2. Bioévaluation des espèces______________________________________________________________ 74 4.3. Exigences écologiques des espèces_______________________________________________________ 75 4.4. Efficacité du dispositif des plaques-abris __________________________________________________ 77 4.5. Distribution des reptiles répertoriés entre zones restaurées et zones témoins_______________________ 79 5. Facteurs affectant l’état de conservation des populations de reptiles _______________________ 89 5.1. Tendances naturelles__________________________________________________________________ 89 5.2. Impacts humains _____________________________________________________________________ 89 5.3. Impact des travaux sur la distribution des reptiles ___________________________________________ 89 5.4. Propositions de réajustement des travaux __________________________________________________ 91 - 2 - Conclusion _______________________________________________________________________ 92 Bibliographie ___________________________________________________________________ 94 Travaux consultés pour les Lépidoptères______________________________________________________ 94 Travaux consultés pour les Orthoptères_______________________________________________________ 97 Travaux consultés pour les amphibiens _______________________________________________________ 99 Travaux consultés pour des observations de reptiles ____________________________________________ 119 Annexes Annexe 1 : Signification des statuts "autres" attribués aux Hétérocères observés mais hors inventaire Annexe 2 : Ensemble des données Lépidoptères Annexe 3 : Cartographie partie Orthoptères Annexe 4 : Données Lépidoptères Annexe 5 : Espèces Rhopalocères Annexe 6 : Espèces Hétérocères Annexe 7 : Biotopes Lépidoptères Annexe 8 : Compléments autres insectes Annexe 9 : Tableau récapitulatif des occurrences des observations de reptiles Annexe 10 : Détail des relevés reptiles Annexe 11 : Localisation des abris artificiels pour reptiles - 3 - L’Agence des Espaces Verts de la région Ile-de-France protège et aménage les espaces naturels d’Île-de-France. Outil de la Région, elle imagine et organise le territoire pour que, demain, chaque Francilien vive dans un meilleur environnement. Tous les jours, les agents de l’AEV gèrent les forêts et les sites écologiques pour en préserver toute la richesse et protègent les zones agricoles périurbaines. Et parce que sauvegarder les espaces naturels, c’est l’affaire de tous, l’AEV mène des actions de sensibilisation auprès de ses partenaires et des citoyens. L'AEV mène également une stratégie d’amélioration des connaissances pour mieux connaître et préserver les propriétés régionales dont elle assure la gestion. Des études préalables à la restauration de milieux naturels sont indispensables pour bien cerner leurs enjeux, comprendre leur fonctionnement et proposer des plans d’actions pertinents. C’est dans ce cadre que s’inscrivent les inventaires écologiques réalisés en 2011 dans la réserve naturelle régionale de Moisson (Yvelines). - 4 - PARTIE 1 : INVENTAIRE DES LEPIDOPTERES - 5 - 1. METHODOLOGIE Le protocole de terrain comprenait 1 session diurne mensuelle de Mai à Septembre. 2 sessions nocturnes, non commanditées, y ont été également faites, 1 en avril et 1 en octobre par conditions favorables. Les méthodes employées pour l’étude en accord avec le protocole pré établi sont de manière systématique pour
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Response of Orthoptera Assemblages to Management of Montane Grasslands in the Western Carpathians
    Biologia 66/6: 1127—1133, 2011 Section Zoology DOI: 10.2478/s11756-011-0115-1 Response of Orthoptera assemblages to management of montane grasslands in the Western Carpathians Vladimíra Fabriciusová, Peter Kaňuch &AntonKrištín* Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Ľ. Štúra 2,SK-96053 Zvolen, Slovakia; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Montane grassy habitats in the Western Carpathians are relatively well preserved, maintain high species richness and are often important in accordance to the nature conservation policy in Europe. However, knowledge about the impact of farming on the habitat quality there is rather poor. The influence of various management types (permanent sheep pen, irregular grazing, mowing) on Orthoptera diversity and species determining assemblages of these habitats were analysed on 72 plots in Poľana Mts Biosphere Reserve. Altogether, 36 Orthoptera species (15 Ensifera, 21 Caelifera) were found, whereas the highest number of species was found on plots with irregular grazing (28 species), followed by plots with mown grass (17) and permanent sheep pens (14). All four measures of the assemblages’ diversity confirmed significant differences. Using Discriminant Function Analysis, correct classification rate of Orthoptera assemblages was unambiguous according to the type of management. Each form of the management harboured several characteristic species. Thus implications regarding the biodiversity conservation and grassland management were given. Key words: bush-crickets; grasshoppers; pasture; ecology; nature conservation Introduction or the influence of plant succession in meadows without any management (Marini et al. 2009). Higher species Various systems used to manage grasslands have a diversity was found in grazed compared to mowed significant influence on plant and animal communi- meadows in alpine habitats (Wettstein & Schmid 1999; ties, their species richness and abundance (Kampmann Kampmann et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods in Linear Elements
    Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis committee Thesis supervisor: Prof. dr. Karlè V. Sýkora Professor of Ecological Construction and Management of Infrastructure Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Thesis co‐supervisor: Dr. ir. André P. Schaffers Scientific researcher Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Other members: Prof. dr. Dries Bonte Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Hans Van Dyck Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium Prof. dr. Paul F.M. Opdam Wageningen University Prof. dr. Menno Schilthuizen University of Groningen This research was conducted under the auspices of SENSE (School for the Socio‐Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment) Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Jinze Noordijk Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Doctorate Board to be defended in public on Tuesday 3 November 2009 at 1.30 PM in the Aula Noordijk J (2009) Arthropods in linear elements – occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen NL with references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN 978‐90‐8585‐492‐0 C’est une prairie au petit jour, quelque part sur la Terre. Caché sous cette prairie s’étend un monde démesuré, grand comme une planète. Les herbes folles s’y transforment en jungles impénétrables, les cailloux deviennent montagnes et le plus modeste trou d’eau prend les dimensions d’un océan. Nuridsany C & Pérennou M 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Population, Ecology and Morphology of Saga Pedo (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) at the Northern Limit of Its Distribution
    Eur. J. Entomol. 104: 73–79, 2007 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1200 ISSN 1210-5759 Population, ecology and morphology of Saga pedo (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) at the northern limit of its distribution ANTON KRIŠTÍN and PETER KAĕUCH Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štúrova 2, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Tettigoniidae, survival strategies, endangered species, large insect predators, ecological limits Abstract. The bush-cricket Saga pedo, one of the largest predatory insects, has a scattered distribution across 20 countries in Europe. At the northern boundary of its distribution, this species is most commonly found in Slovakia and Hungary. In Slovakia in 2003–2006, 36 known and potentially favourable localities were visited and at seven this species was recorded for the first time. This species has been found in Slovakia in xerothermic forest steppes and limestone grikes (98% of localities) and on slopes (10–45°) with south-westerly or westerly aspects (90%) at altitudes of 220–585 m a.s.l. (mean 433 m, n = 20 localities). Most individuals (66%) were found in grass-herb layers 10–30 cm high and almost 87% within 10 m of a forest edge (oak, beech and hornbeam being prevalent). The maximum density was 12 nymphs (3rd–5th instar) / 1000 m2 (July 4, 510 m a.s.l.). In a comparison of five present and previous S. pedo localities, 43 species of Orthoptera were found in the present and 37 in previous localities. The mean numbers and relative abundance of species in present S.
    [Show full text]
  • Faunistics and Ecology of the Grasshoppers and Crickets (Saltatoria) of the Dunes Along the Belgian Coast
    Faunistics and ecology of the grasshoppers and crickets (Saltatoria) of the dunes along the Belgian coast by Kris DECLEER & Hendrik DEVRIESE Abstract Hitherto a total number of 23 species were recorded in the coastal dune area; this is about half of the Belgian Saltatoria fauna. Despite the overall deterioration of the former semi-natural dune landscape during the past decades, still 18 species were found after 1980. The actual presence of 3 additional species needs confirmation. Three species seem to have become extinct: Decticus verrucivorus, Gryllus campestris and Mecostethus grossus. Both in a Flemish and Belgian perspective, the coastal dunes still form a stronghold for several rare species, e.g. Conocephalus disco/or, Platycleis albopunctata, Tetrix ceperoi, Chorthippus albomarginatus and Oedipoda caerulescens. The importance of particular microclimatological conditions for the occurrence of most grasshoppers is stressed. The cessation in the beginning of the century of the agricultural practice of cattle grazing in the inner-dunes undoubtedly played an important role in the extinction process or the decrease of several species. An increased effort to remove considerable parts of dense scrub vegetations in former dune grasslands and the re-use of extensive grazing as a management practice can therefore strongly be recommended. Resume La faune des criquets et sauterelles (Saltatoria) du district des dunes littorales comprend 23 especes, soit environ la moitie de la faune belge. Malgre la deterioration complete des paysages semi-naturelles des dunes durant les dernieres decennies, 18 especes ont encore ete observees apres 1980. L'eventuelle presence de 3 autres especes doit etre confirmee. Trois especes peuvent etre considerees comme disparues: Decticus verrucivorus, Gryllus campestris et Mecostethus grossus.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape-Scale Connections Between the Land Use, Habitat Quality and Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Mureç/Maros Valley
    TISCIA monograph series Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureç/Maros valley Edited by László Körmöczi Szeged-Arad 2012 Two countries, one goal, joint success! Hungary-Romania European Union Cross-Border Co-operation European Regional Development Fund Programme 2007-2013 Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureç/Maros valley TISCIA monograph series 1. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Maros/Mure§ River Valley. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1995. 2. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Cri§/Kórós Rivers' Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1997. 3. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Some§/Szamos River Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1999. 4. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background, 1999. 5. L. Gallé and L. Kórmóczi (eds.): Ecology of River Valleys, 2000. 6. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): Ecological Aspects of the Tisa River Basin, 2002. 7. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, I. 2005. 8. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, II. 2008. 9. L. Kórmóczi (ed.): Ecological and socio-economic relations in the valleys of river K6ros/Cri§ and river Maros/Mure§, 2011. 10. L. Kórmóczi (ed.): Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mure§/Maros valley, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Grazing on Orthopteran Assemblages of Central-European Sand Grasslands
    Research Article Z. KENYERESJournal of Orthoptera Research 2018, 27(1): 23-3323 Effects of grazing on orthopteran assemblages of Central-European sand grasslands ZOLTÁN KENYERES1 1 Acrida Conservational Research L.P., Tapolca 8300, Hungary. Corresponding author: Zoltán Kenyeres ([email protected]) Academic editor: Corinna S. Bazelet | Received 12 June 2017 | Accepted 14 January 2018 | Published 12 June 2018 http://zoobank.org/931577F0-49AA-4CA9-965A-E2A5FB862ECC Citation: Kenyeres Z (2018) Effects of grazing on orthopteran assemblages of Central-European sand grasslands. Journal of Orthoptera Research 27(1): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.15033 Abstract of the habitat-structure (Metera et al. 2010). Nutrient-poor habi- tats seem to be the most sensitive to grazing intensity (Kruess and The effect of grazing on Orthoptera assemblages has long been the Tscharntke 2002). When the grazing pressure decreases or is aban- focus of research worldwide due to the high sensitivity of orthopterans doned in the grasslands of a temperate climate zone, the coverage to changes in vegetation structure. According to previous studies, grazing of the dominant, narrow-leaved perennial monocotyledons of the has individual, spatially-different effects on orthopteran assemblages. The associated plants increases (Critchley et al. 2008), while the cover- current case study was carried out between 2012 and 2016 in a subarea age of annual plant species becomes reduced (Matus et al. 2003). dominated by open sandy grasslands in the Carpathian Basin. The ~70 ha study area was grazed by 250–300 sheep in 2012. In the beginning In addition to the favorable changes for the vegetation-dependent of 2014, the overgrazing pressure was overall reduced, for the most part, insect communities, the abandonment of grazing can also cause in the examined grassland patches.
    [Show full text]
  • Pala Earctic G Rassland S
    Issue 46 (July 2020) ISSN 2627-9827 - DOI 10.21570/EDGG.PG.46 Journal of the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group Dry Grassland of the Eurasian Journal PALAEARCTIC GRASSLANDS PALAEARCTIC 2 Palaearctic Grasslands 46 ( J u ly 20 2 0) Table of Contents Palaearctic Grasslands ISSN 2627-9827 DOI 10.21570/EDGG.PG46 Palaearctic Grasslands, formerly published under the names Bulletin of the European Editorial 3 Dry Grassland Group (Issues 1-26) and Bulletin of the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group (Issues 27-36) is the journal of the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group (EDGG). It usually appears in four issues per year. Palaearctic Grasslands publishes news and announce- ments of EDGG, its projects, related organisations and its members. At the same time it serves as outlet for scientific articles and photo contributions. News 4 Palaearctic Grasslands is sent to all EDGG members and, together with all previous issues, it is also freely available at http://edgg.org/publications/bulletin. All content (text, photos, figures) in Palaearctic Grasslands is open access and available under the Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 4.0 that allow to re-use it provided EDGG Publications 8 proper attribution is made to the originators ("BY") and the new item is licensed in the same way ("SA" = "share alike"). Scientific articles (Research Articles, Reviews, Forum Articles, Scientific Reports) should be submitted to Jürgen Dengler ([email protected]), following the Au- Aleksanyan et al.: Biodiversity of 12 thor Guidelines updated in Palaearctic Grasslands 45: 4. They are subject to editorial dry grasslands in Armenia: First review, with one member of the Editorial Board serving as Scientific Editor and deciding results from the 13th EDGG Field about acceptance, necessary revisions or rejection.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation, Biodiversity and Governance of Semi-Natural Grasslands in Southern Transylvania (Romania)
    Conservation, biodiversity and governance of semi-natural grasslands in Southern Transylvania (Romania) Dissertation for the award of the degree "Doctor of Philosophy" Ph.D., Division of Mathematics and Natural Sciences of the Georg-August University of Göttingen within the doctoral program Biology of the Georg-August University School of Science (GAUSS) submitted by Laura Sutcliffe from Great Yarmouth (UK) Göttingen, November 2013 Thesis Committee Prof. Dr. Christoph Leuschner Plant Ecology and Ecosystem Research, Georg-August University of Göttingen Prof. Dr. Rainer Marggraf Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August University of Göttingen Dr. Thomas Becker Geobotany, University of Trier Members of the Examination Board Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Christoph Leuschner Plant Ecology and Ecosystem Research, Georg-August University of Göttingen Second Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Rainer Marggraf Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August University of Göttingen Further members of the Examination Board Prof. Dr. Erwin Bergmeier Vegetation and Phytodiversity Analysis, Georg-August University of Göttingen Prof. Dr. Markus Hauck Plant Ecology and Ecosystem Research, Georg-August University of Göttingen Prof. Dr. Johannes Isselstein Institute of Grassland Science, Georg-August University of Göttingen Prof. Dr. Teja Tscharntke Agroecology, Georg-August University of Göttingen Date of the oral examination: 11.12.2013 Table of contents Chapter 1 – General introduction ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Articulata 2004 Xx(X)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Articulata - Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V. DGfO Jahr/Year: 2013 Band/Volume: 28_2013 Autor(en)/Author(s): Szövenyi Gergely, Harmos K., Nagy Barnabas Artikel/Article: The Orthoptera fauna of Cserhát Hills and its surroundings (North Hungary) 69-90 © Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V.; download http://www.dgfo-articulata.de/; www.zobodat.at ARTICULATA 2013 28 (1/2): 69‒90 FAUNISTIK The Orthoptera fauna of Cserhát Hills and its surroundings (North Hungary) Gergely Szövényi, Krisztián Harmos & Barnabás Nagy Abstract Cserhát is an orthopterologically relatively less studied region of the North Hun- garian Mountains. After a faunistic research conducted here, the Orthoptera fauna of the Cserhát region is summarized. The pool of formerly known 33 spe- cies is raised to 67, which is about 53% of the total Orthoptera fauna of Hungary. Seven of them (Acrida ungarica, Isophya modesta, Leptophyes discoidalis, Poly- sarcus denticauda, Poecilimon fussii, Saga pedo, Tettigonia caudata) are legally protected and two (Isophya costata, Paracaloptenus caloptenoides) strictly pro- tected in Hungary. Others (Aiolopus thalassinus, Chorthippus dichrous, Oedaleus decorus, Pachytrachis gracilis, Pezotettix giornae, Platycleis affinis, Rhacocleis germanica, Ruspolia nitidula, Tessellana veyseli) are zoogeographically also valuable here, near their northern-northwestern areal limit. Zusammenfassung Der Orthopteren-Fauna der nördlichen Mittelgebirge Ungarns ist ziemlich gut er- forscht, aber die Hügellandschaft Cserhát, in den westlichen Teil der Nördlichen Mittelgebirge, bildete bisher eine Ausnahme. Basierend auf unsere Untersuchun- gen, durchgeführt zwischen 1963 und 2011, hat sich die Artenzahl hier auf 67 erhöht (= 53% der Orthopteren-Arten Ungarns).
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera, Acrididae) Au Pied Sud Du Jura
    Observations phénologiques sur Chorthippus mollis (Charp.) (Orthoptera, Acrididae) au pied sud du Jura Autor(en): Thorens, P. Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft = Bulletin de la Société Entomologique Suisse = Journal of the Swiss Entomological Society Band (Jahr): 67 (1994) Heft 3-4 PDF erstellt am: 05.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-402560 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich
    [Show full text]
  • Orthoptera, Acrididae) in the Rottensand (Pfynwald, VS): Biodiversity Aspects
    Planning a migration corridor for the highly endangered grasshopper Chorthippus pullus (Orthoptera, Acrididae) in the Rottensand (Pfynwald, VS): biodiversity aspects. Diplomarbeit der Philosophisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Bern vorgelegt von Salomé Kurth März 2007 Leiter der Arbeit: Prof. Dr. Jürg Zettel Abteilung Synökologie, Zoologisches Institut TABLE OF CONTENTS 0. Zusammenfassung, Summary 4 1. Introduction 7 2. Material and Methods 10 2.1 Study site 10 2.1.1 Habitat parameters 11 2.1.1.1 Zone characteristics 11 2.1.1.2 Vegetation and soil surface 11 2.2 Insect inventory 11 2.2.1 Sampling methods 11 2.2.2 Handling 12 2.2.3 Identification 13 2.2.4 Species spectrum and abundance 13 2.2.5 Chorthippus pullus 14 2.3 Statistics 15 3. Results 17 3.1 Study site 17 3.1.1 Habitat parameters 17 3.1.1.1 Zone characteristics 17 3.1.1.2 Vegetation 17 3.1.1.3 Temperature 19 3.2 Insects: Biodiversity and abundance 20 3.2.1 Orthoptera 21 3.2.1.1 Species spectrum and abundances 21 3.2.1.2 Relationship species – habitat parameters 25 3.2.1.3 Chorthippus pullus: population size and dispersal 27 3.2.2 Heteroptera 29 3.2.2.1 Species spectrum and abundances 29 3.2.2.2 Relationship species – habitat parameters 31 3.2.3 Sphecidae 31 3.2.3.1 Species spectrum and abundances 31 3.2.3.2 Relationship species – habitat parameters 32 3.2.4 Coleoptera 32 3.2.4.1 Species spectrum and abundances 32 2 3.2.4.2 Relationship species – habitat parameters 34 3.2.5 Myrmeleonidae 35 4.
    [Show full text]
  • CIRAD - Locust Ecology & Control Unit, Bibliographical Query Database, Issued September 2005
    CIRAD - Locust ecology & control unit, bibliographical query database, issued September 2005 1. ABDULGADER A. & MOHAMMAD K.U., 1990. – Taxonomic significance of epiphallus in some Libyan grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acridoidea ). – Annals of Agricultural Science (Cairo), 3535(special issue) : 511- 519. 2. ABRAMS P.A. & SCHMITZ O.J., 1999. – The effect of risk of mortality on the foraging behaviour of animals faced with time and digestive capacity constraints. – Evolutionary Ecology Research, 11(3) : 285-301. 3. ABU Z.N., 1998. – A nematode parasite from the lung of Mynah birds at Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. – Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 2828(3) : 659-663. 4. ACHTEMEIER G.L., 1992. – Grasshopper response to rapid vertical displacements within a “clear air” boundary layer as observed by doppler radar. – Environmental Entomology, 2121(5) : 921-938. 5. ACKONOR J.B. & VAJIME C.K., 1995. – Factors affecting Locusta migratoria migratorioides egg development and survival in the Lake Chad basin outbreak area. – International Journal of Pest Management, 44111(2) : 87-96. 6. ADIS J. & JUNK W.J., 2003. – Feeding impact and bionomics of the grasshopper Cornops aquaticum on the water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes in Central Amazonian floodplains. – Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 3838(3) : 245-249. 7. ADIS J., LHANO M., HILL M., JUNK W.J., MARQUES MARINEZ I. & OBEOBERHOLZERRHOLZER H., 2004. – What determines the number of juvenile instars in the tropical grasshopper Cornops aquaticum (Leptysminae : Acrididae : Orthoptera) ? – Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 3939(2) : 127-132. 8. AGRO D., 1994. – Grasshoppers as food source for black-billed cuckoo. – Ontario Birds, 1212(1) : 28-29. 9. AHAD M.A., SHAHJAHAN M.
    [Show full text]