DOCSLIB.ORG

Agenda of Georges River Local Planning Panel (LPP)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agenda of Georges River Local Planning Panel (LPP) AGENDA - LPP Meeting: Georges River Local Planning Panel (LPP) Date: Thursday, 19 September 2019 Time: 4.00pm Venue: Council Chambers, Civic Centre, Hurstville Panel Members: Adam Seton (Chairperson) Michael Leavey (Expert Panel Member) Helen Deegan (Expert Panel Member) Annette Ruhotas (Community Representative) 1. On Site Inspections - 1.00pm – 3.30pm a) 61-63 Lawrence Street, Peakhurst b) 16 Peake Parade, Peakhurst c) 2-6 Lacey Street, Kogarah Bay and 186-190 Princes Highway, Beverley Park Break - 3.30pm 2. Public Meeting – Consideration of Items 4.00pm – 6.00pm - Public Meeting SessionTHIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF ClosedTHE GEORGESR RIVER COUNCIL - BUSINESS6.00pm PAPER. FOR THE OFFICIAL DOCUMENT PLEASE VISIT THE GEORGES RIVER WEBSITE; WWW.GEORGESRIVER.NSW.GOV.AU (Break – Light Supper served to Panel Members) Georges River Council – Local Planning Panel Thursday, 19 September 2019 Page 2 3. Reports and LPP Deliberations in Closed Session - 6.30pm 19 LPP035-19 61-63 Lawrence Street, Peakhurst – DA2017/0584 - (Report by Development Assessment Planner) LPP036-19 16 Peake Parade, Peakhurst – DA2017/0627 (Report by Senior Development Assessment Planner) LPP035 LPP037-19 186-190 Princes Highway Beverley Park and 2-6 Lacey Street, Kogarah Bay – DA2018/0513 (Report by Senior Development Assessment Planner) 4. Confirmation of Minutes MINUTES: Georges River Local Planning Panel (LPP) - 05 September 2019 (18/653) WWW.GEORGESRIVER.NSW.GOV.AU WEBSITE; RIVER GEORGES THE VISIT PLEASE DOCUMENT OFFICIAL THE FOR PAPER. BUSINESS COUNCIL RIVER GEORGESR THE OF COPY PRINTED A IS THIS Georges River Council – Local Planning Panel Thursday, 19 September 2019 Page 3 REPORT TO GEORGES RIVER COUNCIL LPP MEETING OF THURSDAY, 19 SEPTEMBER 2019 19 - Development LPP Report No LPP035-19 DA2017/0584 Application No Site Address & Ward 61-63 Lawrence Street, Peakhurst LPP035 Locality Peakhurst Ward Proposed Development Lot consolitation, demolition of the existing structures and construction of three (3) storey residential flat building with basement parking. Owners Younan Management Pty Ltd, CHY Holdings Pty Ltd, Maria A. Rasic Applicant Cornerstone Design Planner/Architect Cornerstone Design Date Of Lodgement 24/11/2017 Submissions Nil Submissions Cost of Works $3,390,000.00 Local Planning Panel Development is defined as a “ResidentialWWW.GEORGESRIVER.NSW.GOV.AU Flat Building” and is Criteria subject to SEPP 65. A Clause 4.6WEBSITE; variation in respect to exceedance of the height controlRIVER List of all relevant s.4.15 State Environmental PlanningGEORGES Policy No 55 - Remediation of THE matters (formerly Land, State EnvironmentalVISIT Planning Policy No 65 - Design s79C(1)(a)) Quality of Residential ApartmentPLEASE Development, State EnvironmentalDOCUMENT Planning Policy (Vegetation in Non-Rural Areas) 2017, State Environmental Planning Policy – OFFICIAL Infrastructure, DraftTHE Environmental State Environmental Planning FOR Policy, Apartment Design Guide, Greater Metropolitan Regional PAPER. Environmental Plan No 2 - Georges River Catchment, BUSINESS Hurstville Local Environmental Plan 2012, Hurstville COUNCIL DevelopmentRIVER Control Plan No 1 - LGA Wide List all documents Survey Plan, Architectural Plans, Landscape Plan, Concept GEORGESR submitted with this THEStormwater Plans, Statement of Environmental Effects, OF report for the Panel’s COPY consideration PRINTED A IS THIS Report prepared by Development Assessment Planner Recommendation THAT the application be approved, in accordance with the conditions included within this report. Summary of matters for consideration under Section 4.15 Have all recommendations in relation to relevant s4.15 matters Yes been summarised in the Executive Summary of the assessment report? Legislative clauses requiring consent authority satisfaction Yes Georges River Council – Local Planning Panel Thursday, 19 September 2019 Page 4 Have relevant clauses in all applicable environmental planning instruments where the consent authority must be satisfied about a particular matter been listed and relevant 19 - recommendations summarised, in the Executive Summary of the assessment report? Clause 4.6 Exceptions to development standards LPP035 If a written request for a contravention to a development Yes - Clause 4.6 standard (clause 4.6 of the LEP) has been received, has it Statement submitted in been attached to the assessment report? respect to Height Special Infrastructure Contributions Does the DA require Special Infrastructure Contributions Not Applicable conditions (under s7.24)? Conditions Have draft conditions been provided to the applicant for No, however will be comment? available when the report WWW.GEORGESRIVER.NSW.GOV.AU is published WEBSITE; RIVER Site Plan GEORGES THE VISIT PLEASE DOCUMENT OFFICIAL THE FOR PAPER. BUSINESS COUNCIL RIVER GEORGESR THE OF COPY PRINTED A IS THIS Sites outlined in red Executive Summary Proposal 1. Council is in receipt of an application which proposes lot consolidation, demolition of all structures, tree removal and the construction a three (3) storey residential flat building containing fourteen (14) residential apartments and one (1) basement level accommodating twenty-two (22) parking spaces and associated landscaping works at 61- 63 Lawrence Street, Peakhurst. Georges River Council – Local Planning Panel Thursday, 19 September 2019 Page 5 Specifically the development proposes fourteen (14) residential apartments with the following unit mix: 19 - 2 x 1 bedroom apartments 8 x 2 bedroom apartments; and 4 x 3 bedroom apartments. LPP035 (two (2) of the units are nominated as adaptable). One (1) basement level containing twenty-two (22) vehicle car parking spaces, two (2) being accessible and one (1) car wash bay. Site and Locality 2. The development site involves the amalgamation of 61 and 63 Lawrence Street, Peakhurst. The sites are rectangular in shape with No 61 Lawrence Street having a 15.24m arced front northern boundary, a 36.505m side eastern boundary, a 36.73m side western boundary, a 17.68m arced rear southern boundary and a totalWWW.GEORGESRIVER.NSW.GOV.AU site area of 602.6sqm. WEBSITE; RIVER Number No 63 Lawrence Street has a 15.24m arced front northern boundary, a 36.32m GEORGES side eastern boundary, a 36.505m side western boundary,THE a 17.68m arced rear southern boundary and a total site area of 599.1sqm. VISIT PLEASE The amalgamated allotments will result inDOCUMENT a 30.48m arced front northern boundary, a 36.32m side eastern boundary, a 36.73mOFFICIAL side western boundary, a 35.36m arced rear THE southern boundary and a total site areaFOR of 1,201.7sqm. Zoning and Permissibility PAPER. BUSINESS 3. The development site is zoned R3 Medium density residential under the provisions of the COUNCIL Hurstville Local EnvironmentalRIVER Plan (HLEP) 2012. The proposed development is a ‘Residential Flat Building’ and satisfies the objectives of the zone and is permissible with GEORGESR THE consent in the zone. OF Clause 4.6 Variation - HeightCOPY PRINTED A IS 4. The proposedTHIS development seeks a maximum height of 13.85 metres, a variation to clause 4.3 Height of Buildings under the provisions of the Hurstville Local Environmental Plan (HLEP) 2012. The maximum building height for the development is 12m; the proposed development seeks a 1.85m variation, equating to a 15.4% variation. The height breach is due to the proposed lift overrun and pergola/shade structure located on the Roof Top Level. Submissions 5. The proposed development was notified and advertised to the surrounding residents/owners from 6 December 2017 to 5 January 2018. No submissions were received by Council. Conclusion 6. This application has been assessed having regard to the matters for consideration under Section 4.15(1) and 4.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the provisions of the relevant State Environmental Planning Policies, Local Environmental Plan and Development Control Plans. The application seeks lot Georges River Council – Local Planning Panel Thursday, 19 September 2019 Page 6 consolidation, demolition of all structures, tree removal and the construction a three (3) storey residential flat building containing fourteen (14) residential apartments and one (1) basement level accommodating twenty-two (22) parking spaces and associated 19 landscaping works. - Following a detailed assessment it is recommended that Development Application No. DA2017/0584 be approved subject to the recommended conditions at the end of this report. LPP035 Report in Full Proposal 7. The proposed development seeks lot consolidation, demolition of all structures, tree removal and the construction of a three (3) storey residential flat building containing fourteen (14) residential apartments and one (1) basement level accommodating twenty- two (22) parking spaces and associated landscaping works. Specifically, the proposed development contains the following; Basement: - Parking for twenty-two (22) vehicles which includes two (2)WWW.GEORGESRIVER.NSW.GOV.AU accessible spaces and four (4) visitor spaces, one (1) doubles as a car wash bay;WEBSITE; RIVER - Individual storage spaces allocated to each unit; GEORGES THE - Garbage room; VISIT - Access lift; PLEASE - Access stairs; DOCUMENT OFFICIAL THE - Cleaner’s room; FOR - Six (6) bicycle parking spaces; PAPER. BUSINESS - Store room; and COUNCIL - Meter room. RIVER GEORGESR THE Ground Floor – Total:OF Five (5) Units: COPY - One (1) by three (3) bedroom apartment; PRINTED A IS - Three (3) byTHIS two (2) bedroom apartment; - One (1) x one (1) bedroom
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Agenda of Ordinary Council Meeting
    AGENDA Notice is hereby given that an Ordinary Meeting of Council will be held at Manly Chambers on Tuesday 13 December 2016 Beginning at 6:30pm for the purpose of considering and determining matters included in this agenda. Mark Ferguson General Manager Issued: 09/12/2016 OUR VALUES Respect Empowerment Service Wellbeing Equity - 2 - Agenda for an Ordinary Meeting of Council to be held on Tuesday 13 December 2016 at Manly Chambers Commencing at 6:30pm ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY 1.0 APOLOGIES 2.0 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS 2.1 Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting held 22 November 2016 2.2 Minutes of Extraordinary Council Meeting held 30 November 2016 3.0 DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 4.0 PUBLIC FORUM 5.0 ADMINISTRATOR'S MINUTES ................................................................................ 8 5.1 Administrator's Minute No 12/2016 - Collaroy-Narrabeen Beach Sand Nourishment Options ................................................................................................ 8 5.2 Administrator's Minute No 13/2016 - Affordable Housing Policy .............................. 17 6.0 GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORTS Nil 7.0 CORPORATE SERVICES DIVISION REPORTS ................................................... 19 7.1 Draft Pricing Policy: Principles and Basis ................................................................ 19 7.2 Financial Statements and Audit Reports for the Period Ended 12 May 2016 for the Former Manly, Pittwater and Warringah Council's ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Funding Performance Monitor
    UDIA NSW | 2020 Infrastructure Funding Performance Monitor $2.7 billion is currently held as a restricted asset by Councils for the delivery of infrastructure • The current total balance of contributions held across the Greater Sydney megaregion is $2.7 billion, with the average amount held by a Council sitting at $56 million. • Every year new housing contributes almost $900 million to local infrastructure, Executive roads, stormwater, open space and community facilities across the Greater Sydney megaregion through the infrastructure charging framework. It is expected Summary that this infrastructure is built with the funds that are paid. • However, only 64% of the contributions that are paid for were spent in the last three years. Average Total Expenditure Total Income Balance E/I ($’000) ($’000) ($’000) Total 0.64 $650,679 $876,767 $2,653,316 Contributions Under a s7.11 0.85 $564,670 $711,912 $2,330,289 or s7.12 Under a s7.4 0.62 $41,640 $124,180 $259,501 The amount of unspent funding has increased over the past three years • Since FY16 total unspent contributions have increased 33% from $1.98 billion to over $2.65 billion. Executive • In the last year alone unspent contributions increased by 7.8%, or almost $191 million. Summary • Local Government must resolve local issues to ensure that infrastructure is actually provided on the ground. If necessary, the State Government should step-in to support Councils get infrastructure on the ground. Increased funding does not correlate to increased infrastructure delivery • The scatter graphs here show an extremely weak relationship between cash held and expenditure ratios.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittwater and Warringah (Part) 1 Local Government Boundaries Commission
    Local Government Boundaries Commission 1. Summary of Local Government Boundaries Commission comments The Boundaries Commission has reviewed the Delegate’s Report on the proposed merger of Pittwater Council and part of Warringah Council to determine whether it shows the legislative process has been followed and the Delegate has taken into account all the factors required under the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act). The Commission has assessed that: the Delegate’s Report shows that the Delegate has undertaken all the processes required by section 263 of the Act, the Delegate’s Report shows that the Delegate has adequately considered all the factors required by section 263(3) of the Act, with the exception of the factors listed under subsections 263(3)(e2) (employment impacts) and 263(3)(e5) (diverse communities), and the Delegate’s recommendation in relation to the proposed merger is supported by the Delegate’s assessment of these factors. 2. Summary of the merger proposal On 6 January 2016, the Minister for Local Government referred a proposal to merge the local government areas of Pittwater Council and part of Warringah Council to the Acting Chief Executive of the Office of Local Government for examination and report under the Act. The following map shows the proposed new council area (shaded in green). Proposed merger of Pittwater and Warringah (part) 1 Local Government Boundaries Commission The proposal would have the following impacts on population across the two councils. Council 2016 2031 Pittwater Council 63,900 77,600 Warringah Council (part) 77,343 89,400 Merged entity 141,243 167,000 Source: NSW Department of Planning & Environment, 2014 NSW Projections (Population, Household and Dwellings), and NSW Government, January 2016 ,Merger Proposal: Pittwater Council and Warringah Council (part), p8.
    [Show full text]
  • Greening Our City Grant Guidelines March 2021
    Greening our City Grant Program Cooler Suburbs Grant Guidelines March 2021 Acknowledgement NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the land and pays respect to all Elders past, present and future. Greening our City Grant Program Grant Guidelines March 2021 Copyright notice © State of New South Wales through Department of Planning, Industry and Environment 2021. You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment as the owner. However, you must obtain permission if you wish to charge others for access to the publication (other than at cost); include the publication in advertising or a product for sale; modify the publication; or republish the publication on a website. You may freely link to the publication on a departmental website. Disclaimer The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (March 2021) and may not be accurate, current or complete. The State of New South Wales (including the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment), the author and the publisher take no responsibility, and will accept no liability, for the accuracy, currency, reliability or correctness of any information included in the document (including material provided by third parties). Readers should make their own inquiries and rely on their own advice when making decisions related to material contained
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Georges River Council's Proposed Boundary Changes
    SUBMISSION Georges River Council Boundary Realignment Proposal HANDS OFF BAYSIDE © Bayside Council Bayside Council Submission: GRC Boundary Realignment Proposal - Hands Off Bayside File: F20/813 Document: 20/247348 Enquiries: General Manager - Meredith Wallace Contents 1 Proposed Boundary Realignment ........................................... 4 2 Elected Council Response .................................................. 6 3 Amalgamations 2016 ....................................................... 9 4 Bayside’s Fiscal Management of Ward 5.................................... 10 4.1 Current revenue to Bayside Council ($19.5 million) ....................................... 10 4.1.1 Rates and annual charges ......................................................... 10 4.1.2 Potential loss of the Financial Assistance Grant (FAG) ............................... 11 4.1.3 Loss of other income............................................................... 11 4.2 Rates rise for impacted residents (increase of 26%) ...................................... 12 4.3 Destabilising Bayside: A well-run Council ................................................ 13 4.4 Costs to demerge borne by Bayside ratepayers ......................................... 17 4.5 Loss of $50 million worth of Bayside Council owned land ................................ 17 5 Bayside’s Care and Custodianship of Ward 5 ............................... 18 5.1 Major infrastructure: loss of $220 million of Bayside assets ............................... 18 5.2 Joint asset management ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Licence Rent
    Communication licences Fact sheet Communication licence rent In November 2018, the NSW Premier had the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) undertake a review of Rental arrangements for communication towers on Crown land. In November 2019, IPART released its final report to the NSW Government. To provide certainty to tenure holders while the government considers the report, implementation of any changes to the current fee structure will apply from the next renewal or review on or after 1 July 2021. In the interim, all communication tenures on Crown land will be managed under the 2013 IPART fee schedule, or respective existing licence conditions, adjusted by the consumer price index where applicable. In July 2014, the NSW Government adopted all 23 recommendations of the IPART 2013 report, including a rental fee schedule. Visit www.ipart.nsw.gov.au to see the IPART 2013 report. Density classification and rent calculation The annual rent for communication facilities located on a standard site depends on the type of occupation and the location of the facilities. In line with the IPART 2013 report recommendations, NSW is divided into four density classifications, and these determine the annual rent for each site. Table 1 defines these classifications. Annexure A further details the affected local government areas and urban centres and localities (UCLs) of the classifications. Figure 1 shows the location of the classifications. A primary user of a site who owns and maintains the communication infrastructure will incur the rent figures in Table 2. A co-user of a site will be charged rent of 50% that of a primary user.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Decision Making and Independent Panels
    The Henry Halloran Trust Research Report Council Decision Making and Independent Panels Yolande Stone A Practitioner-in-Residence Project A review of the Evolution of Panels and their Contribution to Improving Development Assessment in NSW ISBN: 978-0-9925289-1-1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This material was produced with funding from Henry Halloran Trust at the University of Sydney. The University gratefully acknowledges the important role of the Trust in promoting scholarship, innovation and research in town planning, urban development and land management. The University of Sydney, through the generous gift of Warren Halloran, has established the Henry Halloran Trust in honour of Henry Halloran, who was an active advocate for town planning in the first half of the twentieth century. He introduced and implemented new concepts of town planning in the many settlements he established, as part of h is contribution to nation building. The objective of the trust is to promote scholarship, innovation and research in town planning, urban development and land management. This will be achieved through collaborative, cross- disciplinary and industry-supported research that will support innovative approaches to urban and regional policy, planning and development issues. The Trust’s ambition is to become a leading voice and advocate for the advancement of liveable cities, thriving urban communities and sustainable development. For further information: http://www.sydney.edu.au/halloran I would also like to acknowledge and thank Professor Peter Phibbs Director, Henry Halloran Trust and Dr Michael Bounds, Coordinator of the Practitioner in Residence Program, Henry Halloran Trust for their guidance and support. I would also like to thank council staff, panel members and development assessment experts who provided valuable input into my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Engagement Handbook to You on Behalf of the NSW Government and Our Partners
    COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN THE NSW PLANNING SYSTEM www.iplan.nsw.gov.au/engagement/ IN THE NSW PLANNING SYSTEM in partnership with www.iplan.nsw.gov.au/engagement/ Prepared for PlanningNSW by Elton Consulting COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN THE NSW PLANNING SYSTEM www.iplan.nsw.gov.au/engagement/ PlanningNSW in partnership with NSW Department of Local Government Lgov NSW Institute of Public Administration Australia (NSW Division) Planning Institute of Australia (NSW Division) International Association for Public Participation NSW Premier’s Department Prepared for PlanningNSW by Elton Consulting © Crown copyright 2003 Department of Planning Henry Deane Building 20 Lee Street Sydney, NSW, Australia 2000 www.planning.nsw.gov.au Published February 2003 ISBN 0 7347 0403 8 Pub no. 03-034A Disclaimer. While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of printing, the State of New South Wales, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of this document. Minister’s Foreword Building vibrant and sustainable communities is a complex, multi-layered process but at its heart is one critically important component – the views of the community itself. There is growing recognition both in Australia and internationally that engaging the community in both plan making and development assessment processes results in better planning outcomes. That is why one of the key principles of planFIRST – the biggest reforms to the NSW planning system in more than two decades – is greater community engagement in the planning and development system.
    [Show full text]
  • Smoke-Free Policy in Outdoor Areas
    Smoke-free policy in outdoor areas A 2011 survey of NSW councils Smoke-free policy in outdoor areas | A 2011 survey of NSW councils 2 Contents Introduction 1 Introduction Smoking is the largest single preventable cause of death 2 Methodology in Australia, killing more than 15,000 Australians a 2 Results year. There is substantial evidence linking exposure to 12 Resource kit second-hand smoke with a range of serious and life 13 Barriers to introducing threatening health impacts including heart disease, or expanding policy cancer, asthma and other respiratory problems. Children exposed to second-hand smoke are at an 14 Alfresco dining increased risk of asthma, sudden infant death syndrome 15 Conclusion (SIDS), acute respiratory infections and ear problems. 15 Appendix While most of the evidence relates to Community interest in the provision indoor exposure, there is emerging of smoke-free outdoor areas such evidence on how smoking affects as playgrounds, sporting fields and air quality in outdoor locations such alfresco dining areas is growing. as alfresco cafes and playgrounds. To assist local councils in A recent study which measured developing their own smoke-free cigarette smoke levels in a variety outdoor areas policy, the Heart of outdoor locations showed that a Foundation, The Cancer Council person sitting near a smoker in an NSW, the Australian Medical outdoor area could be exposed to Association NSW, the Local levels of cigarette smoke similar to Government and Shires Associations the exposure of someone sitting in of NSW and Action on Smoking an indoor pub or club. Therefore, the and Health Australia have second-hand smoke in outdoor areas developed a resource kit including where people tend to congregate, a CD-ROM of signage templates including alfresco dining areas, for Local Government outlining in sports stadiums and concert venues, clear detail the steps required to can present a real health risk to present before Council a motion to the public and staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Canterbury Bankstown Local Planning Panel - 30 September 2019
    Canterbury Bankstown Local Planning Panel - 30 September 2019 ITEM 1 Planning Proposal: 74 Rickard Road and Part 375 Chapel Road, Bankstown AUTHOR Planning PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND Council is in receipt of a planning proposal application for the site at 74 Rickard Road and part 375 Chapel Road, Bankstown. The application is requesting to increase the building envelope controls from 4.5:1 FSR / 53 metre building height to 8:1 FSR / 83 metre building height for the purposes of an educational establishment (university). The Greater Sydney Commission has classified Bankstown as a strategic centre, which aims to locate a university and hospital within the emerging health and education precinct. The proposed university (650 staff and 10,000 students) is a City shaping infrastructure project that aligns with the Commission’s initiative and would inject a significant number and variety of jobs to the Bankstown CBD. A detailed assessment of the application submitted to Council indicates the proposal has strategic merit to proceed to Gateway subject to undertaking further built form analysis to ensure overshadowing and wind impacts meet the required planning rules as outlined in this report. ISSUE The Local Planning Panel is requested to recommend whether a planning proposal for the site at 74 Rickard Road and part 375 Chapel Road, Bankstown should proceed to Gateway in accordance with the Local Planning Panels Direction, issued by the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces. RECOMMENDATION That - 1. The application to amend Bankstown Local Environmental Plan 2015 proceed to Gateway subject to the following: (a) Permit a maximum 83 metre building height subject to consultation with Bankstown Airport and the Commonwealth Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Cities and Regional Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes for the Annual General Meeting Held on Saturday 21
    i Minutes3-13 SYDNEY COASTAL COUNCILS GROUP Inc. MINUTES FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING HELD ON SATURDAY 21 SEPTEMBER, 2013 AT MANLY COUNCIL, IN ATTENDANCE Cr. Brian Troy City of Botany Bay Council Cr. Irene Doutney City of Sydney Council Cr. John Mant City of Sydney Council Cr. Cathy Griffin Manly Council Cr. Barbara Aird Manly Council Cr. Tom Sherlock Mosman Council Mr. Peter Massey North Sydney Council Cr. Jacqueline Townsend (Mayor) Pittwater Council Cr. Selena Griffith Pittwater Council Cr. Geoff Stevenson Randwick Council Cr. Leon Gottsman Waverley Council Cr. Bill Mouroukas Waverley Council Cr. Wendy Norton Willoughby Council Cr. Lynne Saville Willoughby Council Cr. Greg Levenston Woollahra Council Mr. Phil Colman Honorary Member Dr. Judy Lambert AM Honorary Member Ms. Wendy McMurdo Honorary Member Mr. Geoff Withycombe SCCG (EO) Mr. Stephen Summerhayes SCCG (SCPO) Ms. Emma Norrie SCCG (CPO) Dr. Ian Armstrong SCCG (POSP) 1. OPENING The meeting opened at 12.30pm. Cr. Griffin (Chairperson) provided a acknowledgement of country and welcomed delegates to Manly. 2. APOLOGIES Cr. Mark Castle City of Botany Bay Council Cr. Darcy Byrne (Mayor) Leichhardt Council Cr. Tony Carr North Sydney Council Mr. Paul Hardie Pittwater Council Cr. Lindsay Shurey Randwick Council Cr. Shane O’Brian Rockdale Council Cr. Peter Towell Sutherland Council Cr. Sally Betts (Mayor) Waverley Council Cr. Elena Kirillova Woollahra Council Mr. George Copeland Honorary Member Mr. George Cotis Honorary Member Emeritus Professor Bruce Thom AM Honorary Member Resolved that the apologies be received and noted. Councils not represented at the meeting Hornsby, Leichhardt, Rockdale, Warringah ii 3. DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS Resolved that the there was no declaration of pecuniary interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Review of Structural Options for Manly Council & Pittwater Council
    Independent review of structural options for Manly Council & Pittwater Council Prepared for Manly Council & Pittwater Council PART A: SUMMARY REPORT 1 April 2015 www.kpmg.com.au Contents Key Findings Introduction & Approach 1 Strategic Capacity 4 No Merger 7 Greater Pittwater Council & Greater Manly Council 11 Single Northern Beaches Council 15 Implementing Reform 19 Inherent Limitations This report is delivered subject to the agreed written terms of KPMG’s engagement. This report provides a summary of KPMG’s findings during the course of the work undertaken for Manly Council and Pittwater Council under the terms of the engagement letter dated 18 December 2014. The contents of this report do not represent our conclusive findings, which will only be contained in our final detailed report – Part B: Compendium Report and Appendices This report is provided solely for the benefit of the parties identified in the engagement letter and is not to be copied, quoted or referred to in whole or in part without KPMG’s prior written consent. KPMG accepts no responsibility to anyone other than the parties identified in the engagement letter for the information contained in this report. Third Party Reliance This report is solely for the purpose set out in the Scope Section and for Pittwater Council and Manly Council’s information, and is not to be used for any other purpose or distributed to any other party without KPMG’s prior written consent. This report has been prepared at the request of Pittwater Council and Manly Council in accordance with the terms of KPMG’s engagement letter dated 18 December 2014.
    [Show full text]