Land Use Effects on Soil Quality and Productivity in the Lake Victoria Basin of Uganda
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LAND USE EFFECTS ON SOIL QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY IN THE LAKE VICTORIA BASIN OF UGANDA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Lukman Nagaya Mulumba ***** The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Rattan Lal, Adviser Professor Norman Fausey Professor Fred Hitzhusen _____________________________ Professor Frank Calhoun Advisor Soil Science Graduate Program ABSTRACT Soil quality indices are useful tools for assessing agronomic/ biomass productivity and ascertaining temporal changes in soil properties in relation to land use and management. This study was conducted in the Lake Victoria region in Masaka, Uganda to: (a) identify key soil properties that impact soil quality and agronomic productivity; (b) evaluate soil quality-management inter-relationships; (c) evaluate the use of soil reflectance as a soil quality indicator, and (d) determine the cost and returns of different cropping systems. Bulk and core soil samples were collected from the 0-20 and 20 – 50 cm depths, from the farmers’ fields, in order to determine soil organic carbon, nitrogen, calcium, phosphorous, magnesium, pH, _13C, _15N, coarse fragments, soil bulk density and soil texture. Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) was determined in the field using a tension infiltrometer and soil depth using an auger. The soil degradation rating was assessed by assigning parametric values to levels of SOC, soil bulk density, Ks, soil texture, soil pH, soil depth and the proportion of coarse fragments in the top soil and these parameters were utilized to develop a single index. Air dry samples were scanned using a spectrometer and the first derivative of the spectral data was calibrated against the measured soil properties. Results indicated that soil quality was affected by SOC, soil depth and Ks. No direct effects of management on soil quality were discerned. Good predictions of several soil properties were obtained using the spectral data. Although a majority of farmers planted bananas as the first choice crop, the highest net returns were obtained from coffee while the highest costs were ii measured for bananas implying that food self sufficiency was the major determinant of the choice of crop to be grown. It was recommended that grasslands must not be converted to agricultural land use because of their high susceptibility to soil degradation and that farmers be sensitized to think beyond food-self sufficiency, a goal that could also be achieved through strategies which increase farm income. iii Dedicated to my family for all the sacrifices they made for me iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to extend my gratitude to the Rockefeller Foundation whose fellowship enabled me to pursue a doctorate degree at the Ohio State University. I also wish to thank my advisor, Dr. Rattan Lal, for providing advice and support through the academic program and research. Special thanks go to Dr. Keith Shepherd, of ICRAF, for his guidance and support when I was during the field work and data analysis. I also wish to acknowledge the other dissertation committee members, Professors Norman Fausey, Fred Hitzhusen, and Frank Calhoun for the time they took out of their schedules to serve on my committee and provide professional input throughout the duration of my study. Without their help, this dissertation would not have been completed. I recognize the contribution of Dr. Moses Tenywa of Makerere University, Mr. Kabango Fred of Masaka, Richard Coe of ICRAF and Andrew Sila of ICRAF for the support and assistance that they rendered to me. I’m also thankful to Mr. Kalule, Mukiibi, Meddy, and Emma for their perseverance and assistance during data collection. Other thanks go to the staff of ICRAF and Makerere University for their cooperation and support in one way or the other. Special thanks are also due to Dr. Harriet Nannyonga for all the assistance she rendered to my family during data collection and while writing up this dissertation. I greatly indebted to my parents, Haji Badru Mulumba and Mrs Hasifa Mulumba for all the support and sacrifice that they had to make for me to get a decent education. v Last but not least, I’m thankful to my wife Birungi, my daughter Mariam and my son Nasser for their inspiration and moral support and long patience as I undertook my studies. vi VITA January 20, 1967 ………… Born – Jinja, Uganda. 1990 ……………………… B.Sc. Agriculture, Makerere University, Uganda. 1993 ……………………… M.Sc. Land and Water Management, University of Nairobi, Kenya. 1993- 1994 ……………… Lecturer, Makerere University 1994- 1996 ……………… Soil Scientist, Farmer Participatory Research Unit, ActionAid. 1995- 1999 ……………… Agriculture Officer, Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries. 1999 - Present …………… Graduate Student, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. PUBLICATIONS Tenywa, M.M., L.M.Nagaya and D.Bwamiki. 1995. Soil Sampling Criteria for Spatially Variable Soils. SSSEA, Conference held November 21-25, 1994, in Mbarara, Uganda. In. M.C. Rwakaikara, M.A Bekunda and J.S. Tenywa. (eds.). Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of East Africa conference, pp 229-235. Nagaya L.M (1995): Participatory Evaluation of On-Farm Soil trials, a paper presented at the 14th conference of the Soil Science Society of East Africa, Mbarara vii FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Soil Science Minor Field: Environmental Economics viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract...........................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgments...........................................................................................................v Vita...............................................................................................................................vii List of Tables .................................................................................................................xi List of Figures..............................................................................................................xiv Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background and Setting ..............................................................................1 1.2 Statement of the Problem ............................................................................5 1.3 Objectives of the Study ...............................................................................6 1.4 Hypotheses to be tested...............................................................................7 1.5 Goals and Significance of the study.............................................................8 1.6 Study Area..................................................................................................8 Chapter 2 ......................................................................................................................16 Review of Literature......................................................................................................16 2.1 Soil Erosion ..............................................................................................16 2.2 Soil Quality...............................................................................................24 2.3 The Banana-Coffee System.......................................................................35 2.4 Modeling Soil Quality, Erosion and Productivity ......................................36 2.5 The Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy ......................................................40 2.6 Soil Organic Carbon .................................................................................42 2.7 Exchangeable Potassium...........................................................................48 2.8 Magnesium ...............................................................................................48 2.9 Calcium ....................................................................................................49 2.10 Land use and Management Practices.........................................................49 2.11 Soils of the Tropics ...................................................................................55 Chapter 3 ......................................................................................................................59 Methodology.................................................................................................................59 3.1 Research Design .......................................................................................59 3.2 Methodology........................................................................................... 655 ix 3.3 Laboratory Measurements.........................................................................69 3.4 Mini Survey..............................................................................................75 3.5 Data Analysis............................................................................................76 Chapter 4 ......................................................................................................................78 Results and Discussion..................................................................................................78 4.1 Soil Physical Properties.............................................................................78