CA Phillips Resume

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CA Phillips Resume Charles A. Phillips 15582 Pelican Lane Huntington Beach, California 92649 (714) 397-0014 Education B.S. Marine Biology, California State University Long Beach, 1976 Professional Experience City of Los Angeles – Environmental Monitoring Division 1979 – present [Water Biologist II] Senior taxonomist: Supervisor of marine benthic ecology group – responsible for identification of marine and estuarine infauna and trawl caught fish and invertebrates required for NPDES monitoring studies of Santa Monica Bay and outer Los Angeles Harbor; data analysis of completed infauna samples for statistical calculations; supervision of field studies (benthic infauna, trawl, water column, plankton (bongo and manta tow) and microlayer). Additional projects include the taxonomic study of the Order Cumacea in the Southern California Bight, clarification of the taxonomy of the genera within the Family Cirratulidae in the Southern California Bight and qualitative taxonomy of the Polycladida and Nemertea Enopla of the Southern California Bight. Taxonomic Consultant (1981 – Present) MTS: 2010 Identification of Polychaeta from San Francisco Bay San Jose State Foundation: 2007 – present Identification of Nemertea & Polycladida (California Bioinvasives Study – San Francisco, Los Angeles/Long Beach, San Diego Bays; California Outer Coast rocky intertidal/subtidal [Oregon to Mexico border]) Weston (Marine Ecological Consultants): 1986 – present Identification of Polychaeta and Mollusca from Los Angeles Harbor and Orange County Sanitation Districts; sort Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Polychaeta into families; identification Polychaeta and Echinodermata San Diego Bay; identification Polychaeta Palos Verdes Capping project; identification of LA3 dumpsite Polychaeta; identification of BIGHT ’98,‘2003 & 2008 Polychaeta, identification of PSAMP Polychaeta; Identification of Hackensack, New Jersey Polychaeta; QA identification of PSAMP miscellaneous phyla, SCCWRP stormwater identification Polychaeta, Mollusca, miscellaneous phyla; QA identification 1 CARP Tanaidacea, identification of Echinodermata Columbia River, Identification of Echinodermata Orange County Sanitation Districts; Identification of BIGHT ‘2003 & BIGHT ‘2008 Echinodermata; Identification of Encina, San Elijo & Oceanside Echinodermata; Identification of Gulf of Thailand Echinodermata SAIC: 1998 – 2008 QA/QC sort and identification of Orange County Sanitation Districts NPDES benthic infauna (polychaeta, mollusca, miscellaneous phyla) , identification of Polychaeta and Crustacea Los Angeles/Long Beach Harbor Bio-Baselin ABC Labs: 1998 – present identification of benthic infauna Marina del Rey and Goleta (all phyla); identification of Crustacea from minor POTW (Avalon, Carpenteria, Gaviota, Goleta, Morro Bay, Oxnard); identification BIGHT ’98 Crustacea; identification of Polychaeta (Avalon, Carpenteria, Gaviota, Goleta, Morro Bay, Oxnard, Ventura), identification of ‘BiIGHT 2008 Polychaeta & Miscellaneous phyla Cove Corporation: 1998 – 2002 identification of Family Cirratulidae (Polychaeta) [Massachusettes Water Resources Authority – Boston Harbor] Osprey Marine Management: 1987 – present QA/QC OCSD identifications (polychaeta, mollusca, others); identification all phyla Anaheim Bay/Huntington Harbour; sorting and identification of marine and estuarine benthic samples (Army Corps of Engineers – Oceanside, Santa Ana River, Sunset Beach); identification of all phyla LA3/LA2 dumpsites; identification of all phyla small POTW (Avalon, Carpenteria, Gaviota, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura); identification of all phyla Shell Oil Platforms (Huntington Beach), Marina del Rey, QA/QC identification of Orange County Sanitation Districts NPDES benthic infauna (polychaeta, mollusca, miscellaneous phyla) Marine Taxonomic Services: 1995 – 1999 identification of polychaeta (ASARCO/Puget Sound/Tacoma copper smelter); secondary ID Crustacea (Oregon/Puget Sound) EVS Consultants: 1990 – 1991 identification of polychaeta (Puget Sound) Dames & Moore: 1989 – 1991 secondary (QA) identification of miscellaneous phyla (intertidal/subtidal) [Nemertea, Polycladida, Sipuncula, Echiura, 2 Phoronida] from Prince William Sound and Kodiak, Alaska (EXXON Valdez Oil Spill) Battelle – Ventura: 1987 – 1989 identification of Nemertea and Sipuncula [MMS Year 1 Santa Maria Basin] Marine Biological Consultants: 1983 – 1986 sorting/identification Long Beach Harbor rip-rap infauna; identification of polychaeta [MMS baseline Santa Maria Basin] Reish Marine Studies: 1981 – 1986 identification of all phyla Los Angeles Harbor; identification of all phyla Gulf of Farallons radioactive dumpsite Reish Marine Studies (1975 – 1979) (Graduate Student CSULB) Supervisor of field sampling (shipboard/diver core); sorting and identification of benthic infaunal samples; monitoring of marine fouling communities; live culture and bioassay studies of marine polychaetes, identification of Indian River Lagoon Polychaeta (Florida), training of taxonomists in Polychaeta taxonomy from Florida Environmental Laboratory Lockheed Marine Research (1977 – 1978) Field sampling plankton (bongo/manta nets), entrainment and conduit grazing studies (Scattergood Generating Plant, Harbor Generation Station, Alamitos Bay Generating Station) Harbor Environmental Studies, University of Southern California (1975 – 1977) Research Assistant, cleaning and sorting of Los Angeles Harbor benthic infaunal samples; training in identification polychaeta and mollusca California State University Long Beach (1976 – 1979) Graduate Assistant and Teaching Assistant (Department of Biology) Publications Dorsey, J.H. and C.A. Phillips. 1987. A new species of Syllis (Ehlersia) (Polychaeta, Syllidae) from southern California, and description of the epitoke and atoke variation in S. (Ehlersia) heterochaeta Moore, 1909. Proceedings Biological Society of Washington, Bulletin No. 7, 152-161. 3 Dojiri, M., D.B. Cadien and C.A. Phillips. 1991. A new species of Ammothella (Pycnogonida:Ammotheidae) from deep water off San Nicolas Island, California. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 61(1):31-41. Memberships Biological Society of Washington California Malacozoological Society Crustacean Society San Diego Shell Club Southern California Association of Marine Invertebrate Taxonomists Southern California Academy of Sciences Western Society of Malacologists Western Society of Naturalists 4 .
Recommended publications
  • Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules
    49398 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR time. The information on candidate taxa Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New will be revised and updated continually Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Fish and Wildlife Service by the Regional Offices identified as Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West having lead responsibility for the Virginia. 50 CFR Part 17 particular taxa. The Service anticipates Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Endangered and Threatened Wildlife publishing annually an update of the Drive, Hadley, Massachusetts 01035± and Plants; Review of Plant and candidate notice of review, annual notice of findings on recycled petitions, 9589 (413/253±8615). Animal Taxa That Are Candidates or Region 6. Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Proposed for Listing as Endangered or and annual description of progress on listing actions. Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Threatened, Annual Notice of Findings Utah, and Wyoming. on Recycled Petitions, and Annual ADDRESSES: Interested persons or organizations should submit comments Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Description of Progress on Listing Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486, Actions regarding a particular taxon to the Regional Director of the Region Denver Federal Center, Denver, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, identified as having the lead Colorado 80225±0486 (303/236±7398). Interior. responsibility for that taxon. Comments Region 7. Alaska. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and ACTION: Notice of review. of a more general nature may be Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Road, submitted to the Chief, Division of Anchorage, Alaska 99503±6199 (907/ SUMMARY: In this document, the Fish Endangered Species, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3
    table of contrents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Part 4.6 4.6. Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Fungi4.6. Fungi Introduction Part 3.1 of this chapter describes landscape-scale vegetation patterns. Part 3.2 describes the vegetative structure, function, and composition of old forest ecosystems, while Part 3.3 describes hardwood ecosystems and Part 3.4 describes aquatic, riparian, and meadow ecosystems. This part focuses on botanical diversity in the Sierra Nevada, beginning with an overview of botanical resources and then presenting a more detailed analysis of the rarest elements of the flora, the threatened, endangered, and sensitive (TES) plants. The bryophytes (mosses and liverworts), lichens, and fungi of the Sierra have been little studied in comparison to the vascular flora. In the Pacific Northwest, studies of these groups have received increased attention due to the President’s Northwest Forest Plan. New and valuable scientific data is being revealed, some of which may apply to species in the Sierra Nevada. This section presents an overview of the vascular plant flora, followed by summaries of what is generally known about bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in the Sierra Nevada. Environmental Consequences of the alternatives are only analyzed for the Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants, which include vascular plants, several bryophytes, and one species of lichen. 4.6.1. Vascular plants4.6.1. plants The diversity of topography, geology, and elevation in the Sierra Nevada combine to create a remarkably diverse flora (see Section 3.1 for an overview of landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in the Sierra Nevada). More than half of the approximately 5,000 native vascular plant species in California occur in the Sierra Nevada, despite the fact that the range contains less than 20 percent of the state’s land base (Shevock 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules
    7596 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR appointment in the Regional Offices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: listed below. Fish and Wildlife Service Information relating to particular taxa Background in this notice may be obtained from the The Endangered Species Act (Act) of 50 CFR Part 17 Service's Endangered Species 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531 et Coordinator in the lead Regional Office seq.) requires the Service to identify Endangered and Threatened Wildlife identified for each taxon and listed species of wildlife and plants that are and Plants; Review of Plant and below: endangered or threatened, based on the Animal Taxa That Are Candidates for Region 1. California, Commonwealth best available scientific and commercial Listing as Endangered or Threatened of the Northern Mariana Islands, information. As part of the program to Species Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Pacific accomplish this, the Service has AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Territories of the United States, and maintained a list of species regarded as Interior. Washington. candidates for listing. The Service maintains this list for a variety of ACTION: Notice of review. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal reasons, includingÐto provide advance SUMMARY: In this notice the Fish and Complex, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, knowledge of potential listings that Wildlife Service (Service) presents an Portland, Oregon 97232±4181 (503± could affect decisions of environmental updated list of plant and animal taxa 231±6131). planners and developers; to solicit input native to the United States that are Region 2.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS DDS-43, Status of Rare and Endemic Plants
    JAMES R. SHEVOCK U.S. Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region San Francisco, California 24 Status of Rare and Endemic Plants ABSTRACT The Sierra Nevada represents nearly 20% of the California land base INTRODUCTION yet contains over 50% of the state’s flora. Approximately 405 vascu- For more than 100 years, the flora of the Sierra Nevada has lar plant taxa are endemic to the Sierra Nevada. Of this total, 218 fascinated botanists even beyond the borders of the United taxa are considered rare by conservation organizations and/or state States. Visions of Yosemite, giant sequoias, and extensive and federal agencies. In addition, 168 other rare taxa have at least mixed conifer forests have added to an awareness of this one occurrence in the Sierra Nevada. Five monotypic genera are magnificent mountain range. The Sierra Nevada, part of the endemic to the Sierra Nevada (Bolandra, Carpenteria, Orochaenactis, California Floristic Province, is characterized by high rates of Phalacoseris, and Sequoiadendron). Information on rarity and ende- plant endemism (Stebbins and Major 1965; Raven and Axelrod mism for lichens and bryophytes for the Sierra Nevada is very specu- 1978; Messick 1995). For most of this century, plant collecting lative and fragmentary due to limited fieldwork and the small number and floristic research remained the pursuits of professional of available collections. Two mosses are endemic to the Sierra Ne- botanists with ties to major scientific and educational centers vada. Parameters obtained for each rare and/or endemic taxon in- (Shevock and Taylor 1987). Floristic studies have as one of clude habitat type and distributions by county, river basin, and their primary goals documentation of all the taxa (species, topographic quadrangle.
    [Show full text]
  • (Arecaceae): Évolution Du Système Sexuel Et Du Nombre D'étamines
    Etude de l’appareil reproducteur des palmiers (Arecaceae) : évolution du système sexuel et du nombre d’étamines Elodie Alapetite To cite this version: Elodie Alapetite. Etude de l’appareil reproducteur des palmiers (Arecaceae) : évolution du système sexuel et du nombre d’étamines. Sciences agricoles. Université Paris Sud - Paris XI, 2013. Français. NNT : 2013PA112063. tel-01017166 HAL Id: tel-01017166 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01017166 Submitted on 2 Jul 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE PARIS-SUD ÉCOLE DOCTORALE : Sciences du Végétal (ED 45) Laboratoire d'Ecologie, Systématique et E,olution (ESE) DISCIPLINE : -iologie THÈSE DE DOCTORAT SUR TRAVAUX soutenue le ./05/10 2 par Elodie ALAPETITE ETUDE DE L'APPAREIL REPRODUCTEUR DES PAL4IERS (ARECACEAE) : EVOLUTION DU S5STE4E SE6UEL ET DU NO4-RE D'ETA4INES Directeur de thèse : Sophie NADOT Professeur (Uni,ersité Paris-Sud Orsay) Com osition du jury : Rapporteurs : 9ean-5,es DU-UISSON Professeur (Uni,ersité Pierre et 4arie Curie : Paris VI) Porter P. LOWR5 Professeur (4issouri -otanical Garden USA et 4uséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Paris) Examinateurs : Anders S. -ARFOD Professeur (Aarhus Uni,ersity Danemark) Isabelle DA9OA Professeur (Uni,ersité Paris Diderot : Paris VII) 4ichel DRON Professeur (Uni,ersité Paris-Sud Orsay) 3 4 Résumé Les palmiers constituent une famille emblématique de monocotylédones, comprenant 183 genres et environ 2500 espèces distribuées sur tous les continents dans les zones tropicales et subtropicales.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Pruning/Maintenance Most Plants Will Respond Best to Pruning AFTER the Flowering Season and Before Significant New Foliage Growth Begins
    Plant Pruning/Maintenance Most plants will respond best to pruning AFTER the flowering season and before significant new foliage growth begins Botanical Name Common Name Pruning Season Pruning Notes CA Native (Yes/No) Plant Type Plant Size Achillea millefolium, Yarrow summer Cut spent flower stalks to the ground. Reseeding on A. millefolium can A.Millefolium: Yes, others: No P 1-4' h x 1.5-3' w, species dependent filipendulina, tomentosa fall be managed by trimming stalks before seed sets. Seeds are attractive birds. Seed can easily be collected and resown in winter. Aeonium spp. Canary Island rose any time Prune to shape or remove dead or top heavy growth. Cut stems can No Su 2-3'h x 1-2' w be re-planted and watered to propagate new plants. Agapanthus Lily of the Nile fall Trim off dried flower stalks to the base. Old plants can be cut to the No P 1.5-4'h x 1-2.5'w ground. Agave spp. Agave fall Remove spent flower stalks after bloom. Remove brown leaves. Some: Yes Su varies widely with species Aloe spp. Aloe fall Remove spent flower stalks after bloom. Remove brown leaves. No Su varies with species Alyogyne huegelii Blue Hibiscus summer/fall Can be pinch pruned/tipped back to 1/3 or 1/2 size after flowering. No S 6-10'hx 6-8'w Responds well to most pruning after roots are established. Anigozanthos flavidus Kangaroo Paw summer/fall Cut off spent flower stalks and brown foliage at the base of the plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List.Xlsx
    Family Latin name Location in garden PINACEAE Abies bracteata (D. Don) Nutt. 10, Yellow Pine W, Californian PINACEAE Abies fabri Craib 236, Asian PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 348, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 355, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 358, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 359, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 360, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies koreana E.H. Wilson 225, Asian PINACEAE Abies nordmanniana Spach subsp. equi-trojani Coode & Cullen 706, Mediterranean PINACEAE Abies nordmanniana Spach subsp. equi-trojani Coode & Cullen 709, Mediterranean PINACEAE Abies spectabilis (D. Don) Spach 235, Asian LAMIACEAE Acanthomintha duttonii (Abrams) Jokerst Location Restricted CACTACEAE Acharagma aguirreanum (Glass & R.A. Foster) Glass 1005, Arid House CACTACEAE Acharagma roseanum (Boed.) E.F. Anderson 1005, Arid House CACTACEAE Acharagma roseanum (Boed.) E.F. Anderson 1005, Arid House FABACEAE Acmispon dendroideus (Greene) Brouillet var. dendroideus 6B, Channel Isld., Californian CRASSULACEAE Adromischus diabolicus Toelken 1005, Arid House CRASSULACEAE Adromischus mammillaris (L.f.) Lem. 1005, Arid House CRASSULACEAE Adromischus mammillaris (L.f.) Lem. 131, Southern African CRASSULACEAE Adromischus mammillaris (L.f.) Lem. 131, Southern African CRASSULACEAE Adromischus mammillaris (L.f.) Lem. var. cinereus (L.f.) Lem. 1008, Cactus Frame CRASSULACEAE Adromischus nanus (N.E. Br.) Poelln. 1005, Arid House CRASSULACEAE Aeonium balsamiferum Webb & Berthel. 1008, Cactus Frame CRASSULACEAE Aeonium balsamiferum Webb & Berthel. 707A, Canary Islands CRASSULACEAE Aeonium balsamiferum Webb & Berthel. 707B, Canary Islands CRASSULACEAE Aeonium balsamiferum Webb & Berthel. 708, Canary Islands CRASSULACEAE Aeonium castello-paivae Bolle 1008, Cactus Frame CRASSULACEAE Aeonium castello-paivae Bolle 707A, Canary Islands CRASSULACEAE Aeonium haworthii (Salm-Dyck) Webb & Berthel.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Within Cornales and Circumscription of Cornaceae—Matk and Rbcl Sequence Data and Effects of Outgroups and Long Branches
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24 (2002) 35–57 www.academicpress.com Relationships within Cornales and circumscription of Cornaceae—matK and rbcL sequence data and effects of outgroups and long branches (Jenny) Qiu-Yun Xiang,a,* Michael L. Moody,b Douglas E. Soltis,c Chaun zhu Fan,a and Pamela S. Soltis d a Department of Botany, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7612, USA b Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-4236, USA c Department of Botany and the Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-5826, USA d Florida Museum of Natural History and the Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Received 9 April 2001; received in revised form 1 March 2002 Abstract Phylogenetic relationships in Cornales were assessed using sequences rbcL and matK. Various combinations of outgroups were assessed for their suitability and the effects of long branches and outgroups on tree topology were examined using RASA 2.4 prior to conducting phylogenetic analyses. RASA identified several potentially problematic taxa having long branches in individual data sets that may have obscured phylogenetic signal, but when data sets were combined RASA no longer detected long branch problems. tRASA provides a more conservative measurement for phylogenetic signal than the PTP and skewness tests. The separate matK and rbcL sequence data sets were measured as the chloroplast DNA containing phylogenetic signal by RASA, but PTP and skewness tests suggested the reverse. Nonetheless, the matK and rbcL sequence data sets suggested relationships within Cornales largely congruent with those suggested by the combined matK–rbcL sequence data set that contains significant phylogenetic signal as measured by tRASA, PTP, and skewness tests.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Time
    Friday September 19, 1997 Part V Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Species; Review of Plant and Animal Taxa; Proposed Rule federal register 49397 49398 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR time. The information on candidate taxa Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New will be revised and updated continually Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Fish and Wildlife Service by the Regional Offices identified as Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West having lead responsibility for the Virginia. 50 CFR Part 17 particular taxa. The Service anticipates Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Endangered and Threatened Wildlife publishing annually an update of the Drive, Hadley, Massachusetts 01035± and Plants; Review of Plant and candidate notice of review, annual notice of findings on recycled petitions, 9589 (413/253±8615). Animal Taxa That Are Candidates or Region 6. Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Proposed for Listing as Endangered or and annual description of progress on listing actions. Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Threatened, Annual Notice of Findings Utah, and Wyoming. on Recycled Petitions, and Annual ADDRESSES: Interested persons or organizations should submit comments Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Description of Progress on Listing Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486, Actions regarding a particular taxon to the Regional Director of the Region Denver Federal Center, Denver, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, identified as having the lead Colorado 80225±0486 (303/236±7398). Interior. responsibility for that taxon. Comments Region 7. Alaska. Regional Director (TE), U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Urban Interface Approved Plant List
    WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE APPROVED PLANT LIST This approved plant list has been developed to serve as a tool to determine the placement of vegetation within the Wildland Urban Interface areas. The approved plant list has been compiled from several similar lists which pertain to the San Francisco Bay Area and to the State of California. This approved plant list is not intended to be used outside of the San Mateo County area. The “required distance” for each plant is how far the given plant is required to be from a structure. If a plant within the approved plant list is not provided with a “required distance”, the plant has been designated as a fire-resistant plant and may be placed anywhere within the defensible space area. The designation as a fire-resistant plant does not exempt the plant from other Municipal Codes. For example, as per Hillsborough Municipal Code, all trees crowns, including those that have been designated as fire resistant, are required to be 10 feet in distance from any structure. Fire resistant plants have specific qualities that help slow down the spread of fire, they include but are not limited to: • Leaves tend to be supple, moist and easily crushed • Trees tend to be clean, not bushy, and have little deadwood • Shrubs are low-growing (2’) with minimal dead material • Taller shrubs are clean, not bushy or twiggy • Sap is water-like and typically does not have a strong odor • Most fire-resistant trees are broad leafed deciduous (lose their leaves), but some thick-leaf evergreens are also fire resistant.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Riverside Friendly Plant List
    ATTACHMENT A COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA FRIENDLY PLANT LIST PLANT LIST KEY WUCOLS III (Water Use Classification of Landscape Species) WUCOLS Region Sunset Zones 1 2,3,14,15,16,17 2 8,9 3 22,23,24 4 18,19,20,21 511 613 WUCOLS III Water Usage/ Average Plant Factor Key H-High (0.8) M-Medium (0.5) L-Low (.2) VL-Very Low (0.1) * Water use for this plant material was not listed in WUCOLS III, but assumed in comparison to plants of similar species ** Zones for this plant material were not listed in Sunset, but assumed in comparison to plants of similar species *** Zones based on USDA zones ‡ The California Friendly Plant List is provided to serve as a general guide for plant material. Riverside County has multiple Sunset Zones as well as microclimates within those zones which can affect plant viability and mature size. As such, plants and use categories listed herein are not exhaustive, nor do they constitute automatic approval; all proposed plant material is subject to review by the County. In some cases where a broad genus or species is called out within the list, there may be multiple species or cultivars that may (or may not) be appropriate. The specific water needs and sizes of cultivars should be verified by the designer. Site specific conditions should be taken into consideration in determining appropriate plant material. This includes, but is not limited to, verifying soil conditions affecting erosion, site specific and Fire Department requirements or restrictions affecting plans for fuel modifications zones, and site specific conditions near MSHCP areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex J: City of Selma
    ANNEXES J - Q ANNEX J: CITY OF SELMA J.1 Community Profile Figure J.1displays a map and the location within Fresno County of the City of Selma and its Sphere of Influence. Figure J.1: The City of Selma J.1.1 Geography and Climate The City of Selma is located in the central San Joaquin Valley in Fresno County and is about 20 miles west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. Selma is 19 miles south of the City of Fresno at the crossroads of State Highways 99 and 43. A major, busy railroad line runs diagonally through the City and parallel to State Highway 99. Neighboring communities include Kingsburg (5 miles south), Fowler (8 miles northwest), and Reedley (12 miles northeast). The City and its Sphere of Influence occupy an 8,194-acre area; the City alone comprises 3,316 acres. Over the past decade Fresno County (Selma) DRAFT Annex J.1 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan the City’s boundaries have changed minimally, with only a small annexation of land in the southwestern portion of the City’s Sphere of Influence. The landscape is generally flat. The climate is mild year-round with average summer daytime highs in the 90s and winter daytime lows in the 40s. The summer months are very dry, while the winter months get the most rainfall and moisture. Selma’s average yearly rainfall is approximately 11.2 inches. J.1.2 History Selma was founded in 1893 as an incorporated, agricultural-based city because of the area’s mild and temperate climate and the presence of a Southern Pacific Railroad line.
    [Show full text]