DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex J: City of Selma

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annex J: City of Selma ANNEXES J - Q ANNEX J: CITY OF SELMA J.1 Community Profile Figure J.1displays a map and the location within Fresno County of the City of Selma and its Sphere of Influence. Figure J.1: The City of Selma J.1.1 Geography and Climate The City of Selma is located in the central San Joaquin Valley in Fresno County and is about 20 miles west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. Selma is 19 miles south of the City of Fresno at the crossroads of State Highways 99 and 43. A major, busy railroad line runs diagonally through the City and parallel to State Highway 99. Neighboring communities include Kingsburg (5 miles south), Fowler (8 miles northwest), and Reedley (12 miles northeast). The City and its Sphere of Influence occupy an 8,194-acre area; the City alone comprises 3,316 acres. Over the past decade Fresno County (Selma) DRAFT Annex J.1 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan the City’s boundaries have changed minimally, with only a small annexation of land in the southwestern portion of the City’s Sphere of Influence. The landscape is generally flat. The climate is mild year-round with average summer daytime highs in the 90s and winter daytime lows in the 40s. The summer months are very dry, while the winter months get the most rainfall and moisture. Selma’s average yearly rainfall is approximately 11.2 inches. J.1.2 History Selma was founded in 1893 as an incorporated, agricultural-based city because of the area’s mild and temperate climate and the presence of a Southern Pacific Railroad line. J.1.3 Economy Much of the area’s economy is agriculturally based. The City of Selma is known as the Raisin Capital of the World because the area has numerous vineyards that produce raisins and supporting packing companies. Other local produce includes tree fruits such as peaches. The retail industry in the City of Selma is growing. The leaders in retail sales include large car dealerships, building material and farming implement establishments, and other general retailers. The retail sales increase is due to population growth, Selma’s incorporation into the Fresno metropolitan area, and the volume of people that pass through the City on its major highways. Select estimates of economic characteristics for the City of Selma are shown in Table J.1. Table J.1: City of Selma’s Economic Characteristics, 2016 Characteristic City of Selma Families below Poverty Level 20.9% All People below Poverty Level 23.1% Median Family Income $45,303 Median Household Income $41,086 Per Capita Income $15,686 Population in Labor Force 10,430 Population Employed* 9,195 Unemployment 11.6% Number of Companies 7,100 Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2012-2016 5-Year Estimates, www.census.gov/ *Excludes armed forces Tables J.2 and J.3 show how the City of Selma’s labor force breaks down by occupation and industry based on estimates from the 2016 American Community Survey. Fresno County (Selma) DRAFT Annex J.2 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Table J.2: City of Selma’s Employment by Occupation, 2016 Occupation # Employed % Employed Natural Resources, Construction, and Maintenance Occupations 2,203 24.0 Sales and Office Occupations 1,957 21.3 Service Occupations 1,776 19.3 Production, Transportation, and Material Moving Occupations 1,700 18.5 Management, Business, Science, and Arts Occupations 1,559 17.0 Total 9,195 100.0 Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2012-2016 5-Year Estimates, www.census.gov/ Table J.3: City of Selma’s Employment by Industry, 2016 Industry # Employed % Employed Educational Services, and Health Care and Social Assistance 1,752 19.1 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, and Mining 1,392 15.1 Retail Trade 1,024 11.1 Manufacturing 925 10.1 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation, and Accommodation, and Food Services 723 7.9 Public Administration 649 7.1 Construction 573 6.2 Wholesale Trade 540 5.9 Professional, Scientific, and Mgmt., and Administrative and Waste Mgmt. Services 497 5.4 Transportation and Warehousing, and Utilities 386 4.2 Finance and Insurance, and Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 322 3.5 Other Services, Except Public Administration 317 3.4 Information 95 1.0 Total 9,195 100.0 Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2011-2015 5-Year Estimates, www.census.gov/ J.1.4 Population The population was estimated at 24,597 in 2016 with a population density of 4,758 people per square mile. Select demographic and social characteristics for the City of Selma from the 2016 American Community Survey are shown in Table J.4. Table J.4: City of Selma’s Demographic and Social Characteristics, 2016 Characteristic City of Selma Gender/Age Male 50.0$ Female 50.0% Median age 30.7 Under 5 years 8.0% Under 18 years 30.4% 65 years and over 11.4% Race/Ethnicity* Fresno County (Selma) DRAFT Annex J.3 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Characteristic City of Selma White 73.7% Asian 5.2% Black or African American 0.4% American Indian/Alaska Native 0.8% Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 80.7% Education High school graduate or higher 61.1% Disability Status Population 5 years and over with a disability 9.7% Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2012-2016 5-Year Estimates, www.census.gov/ *Of the 95.7% reporting one race Fresno County (Selma) DRAFT Annex J.4 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan J.2 Hazard Identification and Summary Selma’s planning team identified the hazards that affect the City and summarized their frequency of occurrence, spatial extent, potential magnitude, and significance specific to Selma (see Table J.5). In the context of the plan’s planning area, there are no hazards that are unique to Selma. Table J.5: City of Selma—Hazard Summaries Geographic Probability of Future Magnitude/ Hazard Significance Extent Occurrences Severity Agricultural Hazards Limited Highly Likely Critical Medium Avalanche N/A N/A N/A N/A Dam Failure Extensive Occasional Critical Medium Drought Significant Likely Limited High Earthquake Significant Occasional Catastrophic Medium Flood/Levee Failure Extensive Unlikely Critical Medium Hazardous Materials Incident Significant Likely Critical High Human Health Hazards: Epidemic/Pandemic Extensive Occasional Catastrophic Medium West Nile Virus Limited Highly Likely Negligible Low Landslide Limited Occasional Limited Low Severe Weather Extreme Cold/Freeze Significant Highly Likely Negligible Medium Extreme Heat Extensive Highly Likely Limited Medium Fog Extensive Likely Negligible Medium Heavy Rain/Thunderstorm/ Extensive Highly Likely Limited Medium Hail/Lightning Tornado Extensive Unlikely Negligible Low Windstorm Extensive Likely Limited Medium Winter Storm Extensive Highly Likely Negligible Low Soil Hazards: Erosion No Data Likely No Data Low Expansive Soils No Data Occasional No Data Low Land Subsidence Limited Occasional No Data Low Volcano Extensive Unlikely Negligible Low Wildfire Extensive Highly Likely Critical Low Geographic Extent Magnitude/Severity Limited: Less than 10% of planning area Catastrophic—More than 50 percent of property severely damaged; Significant: 10-50% of planning area shutdown of facilities for more than 30 days; and/or multiple deaths Extensive: 50-100% of planning area Critical—25-50 percent of property severely damaged; shutdown of facilities for at least two weeks; and/or injuries and/or illnesses result in Probability of Future Occurrences permanent disability Highly Likely: Near 100% chance of occurrence in Limited—10-25 percent of property severely damaged; shutdown of next year, or happens every year. facilities for more than a week; and/or injuries/illnesses treatable do not Likely: Between 10 and 100% chance of occurrence result in permanent disability in next year, or has a recurrence interval of 10 years Negligible—Less than 10 percent of property severely damaged, shutdown or less. of facilities and services for less than 24 hours; and/or injuries/illnesses Occasional: Between 1 and 10% chance of treatable with first aid occurrence in the next year, or has a recurrence interval of 11 to 100 years. Significance Unlikely: Less than 1% chance of occurrence in next Low: minimal potential impact 100 years, or has a recurrence interval of greater than Medium: moderate potential impact every 100 years. High: widespread potential impact Fresno County (Selma) DRAFT Annex J.5 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan J.3 Vulnerability Assessment The intent of this section is to assess Selma’s vulnerability separate from that of the planning area as a whole, which has already been assessed in Section 4.3 Vulnerability Assessment in the main plan. This vulnerability assessment analyzes the population, property, and other assets at risk to hazards ranked of medium or high significance that may vary from other parts of the planning area. The information to support the hazard identification and risk assessment for this Annex was collected through a Data Collection Guide, which was distributed to each participating municipality or special district to complete during the original outreach process in 2009. Information collected was analyzed and summarized in order to identify and rank all the hazards that could impact anywhere within the County, and used to rank the hazards and to identify the related vulnerabilities unique to each jurisdiction. In addition, the City of Selma’s HMPC team members were asked to validate the matrix that was originally scored in 2009 based on the experience and perspective of each planning team member relative to the City of Selma. Each participating jurisdiction was in support of the main hazard summary identified in the base plan (See Table 4.1). However, the hazard summary rankings for each jurisdictional annex may vary slightly due to specific hazard risk and vulnerabilities unique to that jurisdiction (See Table J.5).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding Wildland Fire and Preparedness in San Diego County Working with North County Fire Protection District
    Understanding Wildland Fire and Preparedness in San Diego County Working with North County Fire Protection District Understanding the Threat of Wildland Fire The Threat of Wildland Fire in Our Area? – Gavilan Fire (February 10, 2002) – Cedar Fire (October, 2003) – Paradise Fire (October, 2003) – Rice Fire (October 22, 2007) – Cocos, Highway Fire (May 2014) Understanding the Threat of Wildland Fire • What Drives Wildland Fires in Your Area? – California’s Native Plants are among the most Flammable in the World – Topography – Hot, dry Santa Anna Winds – Year-round Fire Season 2012 Wildland Fire Frequency Mapping The Ready, Set, Go! Program (RSG) • RSG Personal Wildland Fire Action Plan – Family and Property Preparation The Goal is to learn how to improve your homes resistance to wildfires and prepare your family to leave EARLY in a safe manner. National Level Response • Creating Communities Adapted to the Fire Threat - Collaborative efforts at the community level - RSG and is a national tool for this effort - Learn more at www.iafc.org/FAC and www.FireAdapted.org Ready : Prepare your home and family • Home: Creating Defensible Space and Hardening the structure • Family: Create a Family Disaster Plan ReadySandiego.org Alert San Diego Wildland Fire Environment SD Counties Damage assessment team 2007 Rice Fire in Fallbrook: The two main reasons homes were lost: 1. Lack of Defensible Space (Homes overgrown with flammable vegetation) 2. Lack of Ignition Resistant Construction (Homes built to burn) Create Defensible Space Protecting your home from wildfire damage requires limiting the amount of fuel that could bring flames and embers dangerously close to your property.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules
    49398 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR time. The information on candidate taxa Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New will be revised and updated continually Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Fish and Wildlife Service by the Regional Offices identified as Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West having lead responsibility for the Virginia. 50 CFR Part 17 particular taxa. The Service anticipates Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Endangered and Threatened Wildlife publishing annually an update of the Drive, Hadley, Massachusetts 01035± and Plants; Review of Plant and candidate notice of review, annual notice of findings on recycled petitions, 9589 (413/253±8615). Animal Taxa That Are Candidates or Region 6. Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Proposed for Listing as Endangered or and annual description of progress on listing actions. Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Threatened, Annual Notice of Findings Utah, and Wyoming. on Recycled Petitions, and Annual ADDRESSES: Interested persons or organizations should submit comments Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Description of Progress on Listing Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486, Actions regarding a particular taxon to the Regional Director of the Region Denver Federal Center, Denver, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, identified as having the lead Colorado 80225±0486 (303/236±7398). Interior. responsibility for that taxon. Comments Region 7. Alaska. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and ACTION: Notice of review. of a more general nature may be Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Road, submitted to the Chief, Division of Anchorage, Alaska 99503±6199 (907/ SUMMARY: In this document, the Fish Endangered Species, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Wildland Fire Season
    Pacific Northwest Fire and Aviation Management 2019 WILDLAND FIRE SEASON A cooperative effort between the Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior 1 The 204 Cow Fire, ignited by lightning in August 2019 on the Malheur National Forest, was managed to reduce fuel build-up and restore forest health in an area dominated by beetle- killed trees that had not seen fire in 30 years. Photo Credit: Michael Haas Cover: The lightning-caused Granite Gulch Fire, which started in July 2019, burned in a remote part of the Eagle Cap Wilderness within the Wallowa- Whitman National Forest and was successfully managed to restore ecosystem resiliency. USFS Photo 2 A Season of Extremes: Opportunities in Oregon and Washington, Challenges in Alaska The 2019 fire season was short and inexpensive compared to past years in Oregon and Washington. Resources were on board and ready for an active fire year. Yet, the level of fire activity and resource commitment remained well below what has been experienced in recent years. Recurrent precipitation kept most of the geographic area at or below average levels of fuels dryness. The fuel moisture retention helped minimize severe wildfire activity and enabled firefighters to quickly contain hundreds of fires during initial attack. In Alaska, the situation was very different. Fire conditions warranted the highest preparedness level for an extended period of time. Resources from Oregon and Washington were sent to assist with a long and challenging season. While Alaska focused on wildfire suppression, Oregon and Washington seized opportunities to promote resilient landscapes through proactive fire management when conditions allowed.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3
    table of contrents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Part 4.6 4.6. Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Fungi4.6. Fungi Introduction Part 3.1 of this chapter describes landscape-scale vegetation patterns. Part 3.2 describes the vegetative structure, function, and composition of old forest ecosystems, while Part 3.3 describes hardwood ecosystems and Part 3.4 describes aquatic, riparian, and meadow ecosystems. This part focuses on botanical diversity in the Sierra Nevada, beginning with an overview of botanical resources and then presenting a more detailed analysis of the rarest elements of the flora, the threatened, endangered, and sensitive (TES) plants. The bryophytes (mosses and liverworts), lichens, and fungi of the Sierra have been little studied in comparison to the vascular flora. In the Pacific Northwest, studies of these groups have received increased attention due to the President’s Northwest Forest Plan. New and valuable scientific data is being revealed, some of which may apply to species in the Sierra Nevada. This section presents an overview of the vascular plant flora, followed by summaries of what is generally known about bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in the Sierra Nevada. Environmental Consequences of the alternatives are only analyzed for the Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants, which include vascular plants, several bryophytes, and one species of lichen. 4.6.1. Vascular plants4.6.1. plants The diversity of topography, geology, and elevation in the Sierra Nevada combine to create a remarkably diverse flora (see Section 3.1 for an overview of landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in the Sierra Nevada). More than half of the approximately 5,000 native vascular plant species in California occur in the Sierra Nevada, despite the fact that the range contains less than 20 percent of the state’s land base (Shevock 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • AN ANALYSIS of WILDFIRE IMPACTS on CLIMATE CHANGE By
    AN ANALYSIS OF WILDFIRE IMPACTS ON CLIMATE CHANGE By: Taylor Gilson Mentor: Dr. Elaine Fagner 1 Abstract Abstract: The western United States (U.S.). has recently seen an increase in wildfires that destroyed communities and lives. This researcher seeks to examine the impact of wildfires on climate change by examining recent studies on air quality and air emissions produced by wildfires, and their impact on climate change. Wildfires cause temporary large increases in outdoor airborne particles, such as particulate matter 2.5 (PM 2.5) and particulate matter 10(PM 10). Large wildfires can increase air pollution over thousands of square kilometers (Berkley University, 2021). The researcher will be conducting this research by analyzing PM found in the atmosphere, as well as analyzing air quality reports in the Southwestern portion of the U.S. The focus of this study is to examine the air emissions after wildfires have occurred in Yosemite National Park; and the research analysis will help provide the scientific community with additional data to understand the severity of wildfires and their impacts on climate change. Project Overview and Hypothesis This study examines the air quality from prior wildfires in Yosemite National Park. This research effort will help provide additional data for the scientific community and local, state, and federal agencies to better mitigate harmful levels of PM in the atmosphere caused by forest fires. The researcher hypothesizes that elevated PM levels in the Yosemite National Park region correlate with wildfires that are caused by natural sources such as lightning strikes and droughts. Introduction The researcher will seek to prove the linkage between wildfires and PM.
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake Between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facili
    Draft FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facilitate Water Supply for the Exchange Contractors and Friant Division Contractors FONSI-15-034 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation June 2015 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and manage the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provide scientific and other information about those resources; and honor its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION South-Central California Area Office, Fresno, California FONSI-15-034 Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facilitate Water Supply for the Exchange Contractors and Friant Division Contractors _____________ Prepared by: Rain L. Emerson Date Supervisory Natural Resources Specialist _____________ Concurred by: Shauna McDonald Date Wildlife Biologist _____________ Approved by: Michael Jackson, P.E. Date Area Manager FONSI-15-034 Introduction In accordance with section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, the South-Central California Area Office of the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), has determined that an environmental impact statement is not required for the facilitation of an exchange of 13,195 acre-feet (AF) between Westlands Water District (Westlands) and the San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors (Exchange Contractors).
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Fresno-Kings Unit Fire Plan
    Fresno-Kings Unit 5/03/2020 UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Numbers Description Updated Date Section Updated Updated of Update By 4/30/20 Appendix A 36-38 Fire Plan Projects B. Garabedian 4/30/20 Appendix B 40-41 Added Wildland Activity B. Garabedian Chart 4/30/20 Appendix C 42 Update Ignition Data B. Garabedian 4/30/20 Various 103-119 2019 Accomplishment B. Garabedian i TABLE OF CONTENTS UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS .................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... ii SIGNATURE PAGE ............................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 3 UNIT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 FIRE HISTORY ................................................................................................................................ 4 UNIT PREPAREDNESS AND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES ..................................................... 4 SECTION II: COLLABORATION..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CAL FIRE 2014 Madera Mariposa Merced Unit
    Last update: 1 Feb 2012 UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Numbers Description Updated Date Section Updated Updated of Update By 4/14 Contents Page ii 2014 Update P4224 5/14 Signature Page 1 Annual Update C4200 4/13 Executive Summary 2 Re-Write C4200 5/13 I 3-6 Re-Write 4200 5/14 II 7-8 Update P4224 4/13 III 9-10 Re-Write NK 4/13 IV 11-19 Update B4220 5/14 V 20-38 Update All Battalions 4/14 Appendix A 39-43 Update F4207 4/14 Appendix B 44 Update C4200 4/13 Appendix C 45-49 Update JP 4/13 Appendix C-1 50 Update JP 4/14 Appendix D 51 Update C4201 4/14 Appendix E 52 Update B4220 4/14 Appendix F 55-56 Update B4211 4/14 Appendix G 57-60 Update B4212 4/14 Appendix H 57-60 Update B4214 4/14 Appendix I 61-62 Update B4215 4/14 Appendix J 63-65 Update B16 4/14 Appendix K 66 Update B17 4/14 Appendix L 67-68 Update B18 4/13 Appendix M 69 Update JP 4/13 Exhibits: Maps 70-77 Update JP 6/1 Accomplishments 78-80 Re-Write P4224 i Last update: 1 May 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... ii SIGNATURE PAGE .................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 2 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW .................................................................................................. 3 UNIT DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4.8 Water Resources
    4.8 WATER RESOURCES INTRODUCTION This section describes the impacts on County water resources associated with development anticipated to occur under the General Plan. This section focuses on how development at the intensities assumed in the General Plan could affect water supply and water quality. Other water-related issues, such as wastewater, storm drainage, and flooding are discussed in Section 4.5, Wastewater, Storm Drainage, and Flooding. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Water Resources Water resources in Fresno County include a number of rivers and streams, artificial waterways, and groundwater. Detailed information about surface water and groundwater resources is contained in Chapter 5.3, Public Facilities and Services, Storm Drainage and Flood Control, Chapter 5.4, Water Supply and Distribution Facilities, Chapter 5.5, Wastewater Collection, Treatment, and Disposal, Chapter 7.2, Natural Resources, Water Resources, and Chapter 7.3, Water Quality Condition in the General Plan Background Report (Background Report). That information is hereby incorporated by reference and is summarized below. Surface Water Resources The San Joaquin River originates in the Sierra Nevada and flows westerly forming the border between Fresno and Madeira Counties downstream from Mammoth Pool Reservoir. The North and Middle Forks originate in Madeira County near Devils Postpile National Monument. The South Fork begins at Martha Lake in northern Kings Canyon National Park within Fresno County. Average annual precipitation in the upper reaches of the river falls mainly in the form of snow and is as high as 70 inches. By comparison, the arid San Joaquin Valley to the west, average annual rainfall is as low as six inches near Mendota.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules
    7596 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR appointment in the Regional Offices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: listed below. Fish and Wildlife Service Information relating to particular taxa Background in this notice may be obtained from the The Endangered Species Act (Act) of 50 CFR Part 17 Service's Endangered Species 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531 et Coordinator in the lead Regional Office seq.) requires the Service to identify Endangered and Threatened Wildlife identified for each taxon and listed species of wildlife and plants that are and Plants; Review of Plant and below: endangered or threatened, based on the Animal Taxa That Are Candidates for Region 1. California, Commonwealth best available scientific and commercial Listing as Endangered or Threatened of the Northern Mariana Islands, information. As part of the program to Species Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Pacific accomplish this, the Service has AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Territories of the United States, and maintained a list of species regarded as Interior. Washington. candidates for listing. The Service maintains this list for a variety of ACTION: Notice of review. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal reasons, includingÐto provide advance SUMMARY: In this notice the Fish and Complex, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, knowledge of potential listings that Wildlife Service (Service) presents an Portland, Oregon 97232±4181 (503± could affect decisions of environmental updated list of plant and animal taxa 231±6131). planners and developers; to solicit input native to the United States that are Region 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Draft
    Chapter 11 Geology and Soils This chapter describes the affected environment for geology and soils, as well as potential environmental consequences and associated mitigation measures, as they pertain to implementing the alternatives. This chapter presents information on the primary study area (area of project features, the Temperance Flat Reservoir Area, and Millerton Lake below RM 274). It also discusses the extended study area (San Joaquin River from Friant Dam to the Merced River, the San Joaquin River from the Merced River to the Delta, the Delta, and the CVP and SWP water service areas). Affected Environment This section describes the affected environment related to geology, geologic hazards, erosion and sedimentation, geomorphology, mineral resources, soils, and salts. Where appropriate, geology and soils characteristics are described in a regional context, including geologic provinces, physiographic regions, or other large-scale areas, with some area-specific geologic maps and descriptions of specific soil associations. Geology This section describes the geology of the primary and extended study areas. Primary Study Area A description of the surficial geologic units encountered in the primary study area is presented in Table 11-1. Geologic maps of the primary study area and the area of project features are presented in Figure 11-1 and Figure 11-2, respectively. Draft – August 2014 – 11-1 Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Environmental Impact Statement Table 11-1. Description of Surficial Geologic Units of the Primary Study Area Geologic Map of Millerton Lake Quadrangle, West-Central Sierra Nevada, California1 Formation Surficial Deposits General Features Abbreviation Plutonic rocks characterized by undeformed blocky hornblende prisms as long as 1 cm and by biotite books as Tonalite of Blue Canyon much as 5 mm across.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS DDS-43, Status of Rare and Endemic Plants
    JAMES R. SHEVOCK U.S. Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region San Francisco, California 24 Status of Rare and Endemic Plants ABSTRACT The Sierra Nevada represents nearly 20% of the California land base INTRODUCTION yet contains over 50% of the state’s flora. Approximately 405 vascu- For more than 100 years, the flora of the Sierra Nevada has lar plant taxa are endemic to the Sierra Nevada. Of this total, 218 fascinated botanists even beyond the borders of the United taxa are considered rare by conservation organizations and/or state States. Visions of Yosemite, giant sequoias, and extensive and federal agencies. In addition, 168 other rare taxa have at least mixed conifer forests have added to an awareness of this one occurrence in the Sierra Nevada. Five monotypic genera are magnificent mountain range. The Sierra Nevada, part of the endemic to the Sierra Nevada (Bolandra, Carpenteria, Orochaenactis, California Floristic Province, is characterized by high rates of Phalacoseris, and Sequoiadendron). Information on rarity and ende- plant endemism (Stebbins and Major 1965; Raven and Axelrod mism for lichens and bryophytes for the Sierra Nevada is very specu- 1978; Messick 1995). For most of this century, plant collecting lative and fragmentary due to limited fieldwork and the small number and floristic research remained the pursuits of professional of available collections. Two mosses are endemic to the Sierra Ne- botanists with ties to major scientific and educational centers vada. Parameters obtained for each rare and/or endemic taxon in- (Shevock and Taylor 1987). Floristic studies have as one of clude habitat type and distributions by county, river basin, and their primary goals documentation of all the taxa (species, topographic quadrangle.
    [Show full text]