DOCSLIB.ORG

WILDFIRES Northeast Refuges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WILDFIRES Northeast Refuges 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2010 Fire Statistics Regional Map .............................................................................................................. i Regional Activity Summaries Pacific............................................................................................................... 1 .................................................................................................................................................. Southwest ........................................................................................................ 4 ............................................................................................................................... ............................................................................... Midwest ........................................................................................................... 8 ....................................................... Southeast ......................................................................................................... 12 Northeast ......................................................................................................... 15 Mountain-Prairie ............................................................................................. 19 Alaska .............................................................................................................. 22 Pacific Southwest............................................................................................. 25 Wildfires Fire Activity Map ............................................................................................ 30 Number / Acres (graphs).................................................................................. 31 By State ........................................................................................................... 32 By Refuge Pacific .................................................................................................. 34 Southwest ............................................................................................ 35 Midwest ............................................................................................... 36 Southeast ............................................................................................. 37 Northeast ............................................................................................. 39 Mountain-Prairie ................................................................................. 40 Alaska .................................................................................................. 41 Pacific Southwest................................................................................ 42 Southwes................................................................................................. By Cause .......................................................................................................... 43 ffffffffSouthSouthwest.................................................................................. By Size Class ................................................................................................... 43 10-Day Period .................................................................................................. 44 Treatments (Non-WUI) Activity Map .................................................................................................... 45 Number / Acres (graphs).................................................................................. 46 By State ........................................................................................................... 47 By Refuge Pacific .................................................................................................. 49 Southwest ............................................................................................ 50 Midwest ............................................................................................... 51 Southeast ............................................................................................. 53 Northeast ............................................................................................. 55 Mountain-Prairie ................................................................................. 56 Alaska .................................................................................................. 58 Pacific Southwest................................................................................ 59 Southwest..................................................................................Wildland-Urban Interface Treatments Activity Map ............................................................................................... 60 Number / Acres (graphs).................................................................................. 61 By State ........................................................................................................... 62 By Refuge Pacific .................................................................................................. 64 Southwest ............................................................................................ 65 Midwest ............................................................................................... 66 Southeast ............................................................................................. 67 Northeast ............................................................................................ 68 Mountain-Prairie ................................................................................. 69 Alaska .................................................................................................. 70 Pacific Southwest................................................................................ 71 200Southwest..................................................................................6 - 2010 Statistics (graphs) 41 Pacific .................................................................................................. 72 Southwest ............................................................................................ 74 Midwest ............................................................................................... 76 Southeast ............................................................................................. 78 Northeast ............................................................................................. 80 Mountain-Prairie ................................................................................. 82 Alaska .................................................................................................. 84 Pacific Southwest................................................................................ 86 Southwest..................................................................................Regions 1-8 (graphs).................................................................... 41 ................................. 88 2001 - 2010 Statistics (graphs) Wildfires ...................................................................................................................... 91 Treatments ................................................................................................................... 92 Department of the Interior 2006 - 2010 (graphs) Wildfires ...................................................................................................................... 93 Treatments ................................................................................................................... 94 US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE Regional Map i PACIFIC REGION Season Overview Wildland Fire Management Region one experienced varying levels of The heaviest area of initial attack activity fire season across its three geographic occurred at Mid Columbia River NWRC areas. The Pacific Islands were in drought with 13 on Refuge fires and 48 support or conditions and experienced initial attack threat responses. These fires were all fire activity throughout much of the year, managed at the Type III level or lower the Northwest experienced an average fire complexity and contained after several season in both Oregon and Washington, burning periods. and the Great Basin experienced a below average fire load having fewer large fires Large fire activity was experienced on compared to recent years. several refuges in Washington and Oregon. Little Pend Oreille Refuge in northeast Region one had one Type II incident, Washington hosted the Slide Creek fire. A several Type III and numerous Type 4/5 Type II multi-jurisdictional fire (managed fires occur on FWS lands within the by FWS, Washington DNR, and Stevens Region. In addition to suppressing fires on County Fire District #7) located 13 miles Service-managed lands, the Region actively east of Colville, Washington. Hart Mountain provided interagency assistance both in and Refuge located 65 miles northeast of out of Region. 1 Lakeview, Oregon utilized the local Type III stations willingness to share resources to IMT to manage two wildfires totaling 3550 meet Refuge objectives. acres. The Region’s Prescribed Fire Module, The PNW Multi-Agency Coordinating based out of Turnbull NWR, was used in (MAC) Group was activated for several cooperation with individuals from several weeks this summer conducting daily other Refuges as a mobile workforce to conference calls. Regional office staff implement mechanical and prescribed fire continued to participate on the Great
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Wildland Fire and Preparedness in San Diego County Working with North County Fire Protection District
    Understanding Wildland Fire and Preparedness in San Diego County Working with North County Fire Protection District Understanding the Threat of Wildland Fire The Threat of Wildland Fire in Our Area? – Gavilan Fire (February 10, 2002) – Cedar Fire (October, 2003) – Paradise Fire (October, 2003) – Rice Fire (October 22, 2007) – Cocos, Highway Fire (May 2014) Understanding the Threat of Wildland Fire • What Drives Wildland Fires in Your Area? – California’s Native Plants are among the most Flammable in the World – Topography – Hot, dry Santa Anna Winds – Year-round Fire Season 2012 Wildland Fire Frequency Mapping The Ready, Set, Go! Program (RSG) • RSG Personal Wildland Fire Action Plan – Family and Property Preparation The Goal is to learn how to improve your homes resistance to wildfires and prepare your family to leave EARLY in a safe manner. National Level Response • Creating Communities Adapted to the Fire Threat - Collaborative efforts at the community level - RSG and is a national tool for this effort - Learn more at www.iafc.org/FAC and www.FireAdapted.org Ready : Prepare your home and family • Home: Creating Defensible Space and Hardening the structure • Family: Create a Family Disaster Plan ReadySandiego.org Alert San Diego Wildland Fire Environment SD Counties Damage assessment team 2007 Rice Fire in Fallbrook: The two main reasons homes were lost: 1. Lack of Defensible Space (Homes overgrown with flammable vegetation) 2. Lack of Ignition Resistant Construction (Homes built to burn) Create Defensible Space Protecting your home from wildfire damage requires limiting the amount of fuel that could bring flames and embers dangerously close to your property.
    [Show full text]
  • Department Emergency Operations Plan (DEOP)
    San Bernardino County PROBATION DEPARTMENT Department Emergency Operations Plan (DEOP) October 2020 San Bernardino County SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Probation Department Emergency Operations Plan Department (DEOP) THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK San Bernardino County SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Probation Department Emergency Operations Plan Department (DEOP) RECORD OF CHANGES On an annual basis, the County Departments/Agencies shall review their respective DEOP and/or update Department/Agency Functional Annexes as appropriate. Document the date of the review and the names of personnel conducting the review. Change Section Change Revised By Description of Change # Date 1 10/3/18 Carrie Cruz ICEMA response Part I - Basic 2 6/26/19 Carrie Cruz Added Sec. 4.2 – DEOP Implementation Language Plan, Sec. 4 Part I - Basic Added Sec. 4.2.1 – Decision Matrix for DEOP 3 6/26/19 Carrie Cruz Plan, Sec. 4 Implementation Part II – 4 6/27/19 Carrie Cruz Revised Sec. Title and Additional Language Annex 2 Part II – Added Sec. 2.1.1 – MEF Initial Screening Aid and 5 6/27/19 Carrie Cruz Annex 2 Language Part II – Added Standardized MEF Chart for all County 6 Annex 2, 6/27/19 Carrie Cruz Department/Agencies and Language Sec. 2.1.1 Table of 7 6/27/19 Carrie Cruz Updated TOC Contents Part II – 8 7/1/19 Carrie Cruz Added Planning Tips – Step 1 Annex 1 Part II – 9 7/1/19 Carrie Cruz Added Planning Tips – Step 2 Annex 2 Part II – 10 7/1/19 Carrie Cruz Added Planning Tips – Step 3 Annex 3 Part II – 11 7/1/19 Carrie Cruz Added Planning Tips – Step 4 Annex 4 Part II – 12 7/1/19 Carrie
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration Date: January 9, 2019 Case No.: 2016-006868ENV Project Title: SFPUC Reliable Power Project Project Location: Portions of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Rights of Way in Stanislaus, Mariposa, and Tuolumne Counties Zoning: Various Project Sponsor San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Antonia Sivyer (415) 554-2474 Lead Agency: San Francisco Planning Department Staff Contact: Timothy Johnston – (415) 575-9035 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) proposes to implement the Reliable Power Project (proposed project) for maintaining the reliability of the SFPUC’s electrical transmission system between the Holm and Kirkwood Powerhouses and the Warnerville Substation. The project includes implementation of a long-term vegetation management program that would address the North American Electric Reliability Corporation’s reliability standard (FAC-003) and other regulatory requirements that seek to minimize the risk of power outages and fires from vegetation contact with transmission lines on or near the right of way for electrical transmission lines1. In addition to implementation of the vegetation management program, the proposed project would include repairs and replacements for culverts associated with transmission line access roads and construction of a sand storage shed to stockpile sand for winter road treatments needed for access during winter months. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would occur within existing SFPUC facility and right of way boundaries in Stanislaus County, Mariposa County, and Tuolumne County, and would not require the acquisition of new property. Project implementation involving vegetation management would be ongoing. Construction activities and duration for culvert repair and/or replacement would vary along the transmission corridor, but would be short-term in nature, generally requiring a few of days to a couple of weeks to complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Evergreen Fire Protection District Jefferson and Clear Creek Counties, Colorado
    2020 Evergreen Fire Protection District Jefferson and Clear Creek Counties, Colorado F Community Wildfire Protection Plan EVERGREEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN 2020 UPDATE Prepared for Evergreen Fire/Rescue 1802 Bergen Pkwy, Evergreen, Colorado 80439 Prepared by Forest Stewards Guild 170 2nd Street SW Loveland, CO 80537 1 CONTENTS Evergreen Fire Protection District ............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................5 Evergreen’s Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) .......................................................................................................6 Fire History ..................................................................................................................................................................8 Catastrophic Wildfire – Common Factors .........................................................................................................9 Ignition Prevention ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Evergreen’s Preparedness for Wildfire ................................................................................................................. 11 Community Accomplishments since first CWPP .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the QUEUE Before a Difficult Conversation, Take the Other
    Latinpost.com Murrieta Fire Department Weekly Newsletter www.MurrietaCA.gov/fire www.MurrietaCA.gov/fireplans Re-deployed from the Sand to the Fire Soberanes fire out near Big Sur INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Highlights 1 Career Development 1 In the Queue 1 Training 2 EMS 2 Equipment/Facilities 3 Safety/Health 3 Prevention 3 Hot Shots 4 The Riverside County Fire Chiefs Association Steele Steps Up 4 has worked closely with My Safe: California to Fleet 5 produce its first multi-agency public service The Numbers 5 announcement. This edition focuses on Hearst Castle: It looks like the accommodations wildfire-urban interface. Link: HERE at these wildland fires are improving! Ackerman, Cicconi, Brann, and Rexroad assigned to the Chimney Fire. More: HERE Live Updates of California wildfires courtesy of L.A. Now Los Angeles Times - HERE Day #1 - Murrieta Fire Citizen’s Fire Academy EXTRAS In the QUEUE Before a Difficult Conversation, Principles of Modern Fire Take the Other Person’s Perspective Attack: Aug 25 Harvard Business Review – Amy Gallo Aug 19 2016 Free Webinar: How Clean is When you need to talk through a difficult issue with a coworker, Clean? PPE. Aug 30 it’s tempting to just get it over with. But don’t start the HP Open Enrollment: Aug 24 conversation until you’ve taken the time to see the situation from their perspective. Try to get a sense of what your Council Goals: Aug 26 colleague might be thinking. They have a rationale for the way they’ve been behaving, so what might that reason be? Imagine you’re in their shoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
    INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE Table of Contents Section 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 San Bernardino County Unincorporated Area ................................................................ 2 San Bernardino County Fire Protection District ..................................................... 3 San Bernardino County Flood Control District ....................................................... 4 Special Districts Department ................................................................................. 6 1.2 Purpose of the Plan ...................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Authority ....................................................................................................................... 12 1.4 What’s New .................................................................................................................. 12 Updates to the Current Plan ............................................................................... 13 New Jurisdictional Annexes ................................................................................. 13 New Risk Assessment ......................................................................................... 14 Successful Wildfire Mitigation Implementation .................................................... 15 Flood Hazard Mitigation Success ........................................................................ 18 Geologic
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Vulnerability Assessment for Mendocino County ______
    FIRE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR MENDOCINO COUNTY ____________________________________________ _________________________________________ August 2020 Mendocino County Fire Vulnerability Assessment ________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I- OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 6 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 B. Project Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 6 C. Mendocino County Description and Demographics ................................................................ 7 D. Planning Area Basis .................................................................................................................. 8 SECTION II- COUNTY WILDFIRE ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 9 A. Wildfire Threat ......................................................................................................................... 9 B. Weather/Climate ........................................................................................................................ 9 C. Topography ............................................................................................................................. 10 D. Fuel Hazards ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scott Mclean: from the CAL FIRE Information Center, I'm Scott Mclean with the CAL FIRE Report for Monday, August 26, 2019. La
    Scott McLean: From the CAL FIRE Information Center, I’m Scott McLean with the CAL FIRE Report for Monday, August 26, 2019. Last week, amid yet another week of triple digit temperatures, California firefighters saw a steady flow of new wildfires. In total, 202 new fires started statewide, across all jurisdictions. Of those 202, 164 were within CAL FIRE’s jurisdiction. Switching over to our Statewide Fire Map, you can see that there are currently 4 active wildfires with most of those in Northern California. Let’s take a closer look at a few of those active fires, starting with the Mountain Fire in Shasta County. The Mountain Fire started on Thursday, August 22 north of Bella Vista. Within just a few hours, it grew to 600 acres and led to the evacuation of several surrounding communities. However, thanks to the aggressive initial attack by firefighters, the Mountain Fire was kept from growing further, and residents were able to return home relatively quickly. The Mountain Fire currently remains at 600 acres, and is 95% contained. Next up, another fire started yesterday along the California-Mexico border. This one is known as the Border 10 Fire and is burning along the area east of the Otay port of entry, about half a mile south of the border. The Border 10 fire did cross over into the US, but firefighters were able to quickly stop its spread at 20 acres. The Border 10 fire is currently 75% contained. And lastly, we have the Long Valley Fire which started over the weekend off Highway 395 north of the Hallelujah Junction.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management Committee Safety Gram 2018
    SAFETY GRAM 2018 Fatalities, Entrapments and Accident Summary for 2018 (http://www.nwcg.gov/committees/risk-management-committee/resources) The following data indicates the fatalities, entrapments, burnovers and fire shelter deployments during calendar year 2018. The information was collected by the Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center and verified by the NWCG Risk Management Committee. Fatalities Incident Name Agency/Entity Number # Date Type of Jurisdiction Activity of Personnel of Shelters Fatalities Injuries/Treatment Accident Location Involved People Deployed 1/26 Puerto Rico Pack Test Work Capacity Test Local Government Medical 1 1 Cardiac Arrest Fatality Arduous San Juan Puerto Rico 2/28 Water Tender Accident Initial Attack Local Government Vehicle 3 1 2 injured, 1 fatality Fatality VFD New London TX 3/10 Grass Fire Fatality UNK Local Government UNK 1 1 Incident date: 3/10 Ellinger VFD (Suspected Medical) Deceased: 3/23 TX 3/12 Hazard Tree Mitigation Chainsaw Federal Medical 1 1 Fell unconscious, Fatality Operations USFS transported to Olympic NF hospital. Deceased WA 3/15 Grass Fire Fatality Initial Attack Local Government Medical 1 1 Fell ill and collapsed UNK Heart Attack on 3/16. OH Deceased: 3/16 1 Incident Name Agency/Entity Number # Date Type of Jurisdiction Activity of Personnel of Shelters Fatalities Injuries/Treatment Accident Location Involved People Deployed 4/12 Shaw Fire Initial Attack Local Government Entrapment 2 1 1 fatality; 1 FF with Cheyenne 2nd degree burns. OK 4/18 Rocky Mount Fatality Initial Attack Local Government Medical 1 1 Neck and back pain VA VFD on 4/18. Deceased: 4/19 4/21 Training Hike Fatality Fitness Training State Medical 1 1 Collapsed, treated on CA Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019
    REVIEW OF CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE EVACUATIONS FROM 2017 TO 2019 STEPHEN WONG, JACQUELYN BROADER, AND SUSAN SHAHEEN, PH.D. MARCH 2020 DOI: 10.7922/G2WW7FVK DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R Wong, Broader, Shaheen 2 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-19-b N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019 March 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Berkeley 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report Stephen D. Wong (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-3651), No. Jacquelyn C. Broader (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-955X), N/A Susan A. Shaheen, Ph.D. (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-856X) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley N/A 109 McLaughlin Hall, MC1720 11. Contract or Grant No. Berkeley, CA 94720-1720 UC-ITS-2019-19 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Covered www.ucits.org Final Report 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R 16. Abstract Between 2017 and 2019, California experienced a series of devastating wildfires that together led over one million people to be ordered to evacuate. Due to the speed of many of these wildfires, residents across California found themselves in challenging evacuation situations, often at night and with little time to escape. These evacuations placed considerable stress on public resources and infrastructure for both transportation and sheltering.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Wildland Fire Season
    Pacific Northwest Fire and Aviation Management 2019 WILDLAND FIRE SEASON A cooperative effort between the Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior 1 The 204 Cow Fire, ignited by lightning in August 2019 on the Malheur National Forest, was managed to reduce fuel build-up and restore forest health in an area dominated by beetle- killed trees that had not seen fire in 30 years. Photo Credit: Michael Haas Cover: The lightning-caused Granite Gulch Fire, which started in July 2019, burned in a remote part of the Eagle Cap Wilderness within the Wallowa- Whitman National Forest and was successfully managed to restore ecosystem resiliency. USFS Photo 2 A Season of Extremes: Opportunities in Oregon and Washington, Challenges in Alaska The 2019 fire season was short and inexpensive compared to past years in Oregon and Washington. Resources were on board and ready for an active fire year. Yet, the level of fire activity and resource commitment remained well below what has been experienced in recent years. Recurrent precipitation kept most of the geographic area at or below average levels of fuels dryness. The fuel moisture retention helped minimize severe wildfire activity and enabled firefighters to quickly contain hundreds of fires during initial attack. In Alaska, the situation was very different. Fire conditions warranted the highest preparedness level for an extended period of time. Resources from Oregon and Washington were sent to assist with a long and challenging season. While Alaska focused on wildfire suppression, Oregon and Washington seized opportunities to promote resilient landscapes through proactive fire management when conditions allowed.
    [Show full text]