DOCSLIB.ORG

Wildland Urban Interface Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared For: Elk Creek Fire Protection District Conifer, Colorado

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wildland Urban Interface Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared For: Elk Creek Fire Protection District Conifer, Colorado Wildland Urban Interface Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared for: Elk Creek Fire Protection District Conifer, Colorado Submitted By: Anchor Point Boulder, Colorado September 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOPSE....................................................................................................................................................... 1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................... 1 OTHER DESIRED OUTCOMES ......................................................................................................................... 1 UNDERSTANDING THIS DOCUMENT ....................................................................................................... 3 THE NATIONAL FIRE PLAN ............................................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA PROFILE ................................................................................................................................ 5 VALUES......................................................................................................................................................... 10 PRIORITIZED VALUES TO BE PROTECTED ................................................................................................... 10 CURRENT RISK SITUATION...................................................................................................................... 13 FIRE REGIME AND CONDITION CLASS.................................................................................................. 18 CONDITION CLASS DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................ 19 FIRE BEHAVIOR POTENTIAL ........................................................................................................................ 20 SOLUTIONS AND MITIGATION................................................................................................................ 27 ESTABLISHING AND PRIORITIZING FIRE MANAGEMENT UNITS (FMUS) .................................................... 27 ACCESS, EVACUATION AND SHELTERING-IN-PLACE FMU......................................................................... 27 Addressing ............................................................................................................................................... 27 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................ 30 Evacuation Routes ................................................................................................................................... 30 Access Route Fuels Modification Recommendations.......................................................................... 35 Other Access Route Recommendations ............................................................................................... 36 Shelter-In-Place ....................................................................................................................................... 37 PUBLIC EDUCATION EFFORTS FMU............................................................................................................ 39 Recommendations.................................................................................................................................... 39 FIRE DEPARTMENT INVOLVEMENT ............................................................................................................. 40 Recommendations.................................................................................................................................... 40 HOME MITIGATION FMU ............................................................................................................................ 42 Recommendations.................................................................................................................................... 42 ii Elk Creek Fire Protection District September 2005 Community Wildfire Protection Plan LANDSCAPE SCALE FUELS MODIFICATIONS FMU...................................................................................... 45 Current Projects ....................................................................................................................................... 46 Recommendations.................................................................................................................................... 47 WATER SUPPLY FMU.................................................................................................................................. 48 Recommendations.................................................................................................................................... 49 GLOSSARY.................................................................................................................................................... 50 BIBLIOGRAPHY........................................................................................................................................... 52 WEBSITE RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................... 54 iii Elk Creek Fire Protection District September 2005 Community Wildfire Protection Plan LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. TYPICAL AREA................................................................................................................................. 5 FIGURE 2. STUDY AREA COMMUNITIES ........................................................................................................... 6 FIGURE 3. PERCENT SLOPE............................................................................................................................... 8 FIGURE 4. ELEVATION ...................................................................................................................................... 9 FIGURE 5. CULTURAL SITES ........................................................................................................................... 11 FIGURE 7. PIKES PEAK, SOUTH PARK AND SOUTH PLATTE RANGER DISTRICT FIRE STATISTICS ................. 15 FIGURE 8. RECENT LARGE FIRES.................................................................................................................... 16 FIGURE 9. CONDITION CLASS MAP ................................................................................................................ 18 FIGURE 10. FLAME LENGTH PREDICTIONS (AVERAGE WEATHER CONDITIONS)........................................... 21 FIGURE 11. SPREAD RATE PREDICTIONS (AVERAGE WEATHER CONDITIONS).............................................. 22 FIGURE 12. CROWN FIRE POTENTIAL (AVERAGE WEATHER CONDITIONS)................................................... 23 FIGURE 13. FLAME LENGTH PREDICTIONS (EXTREME WEATHER CONDITIONS)........................................... 24 FIGURE 14. SPREAD RATE PREDICTIONS (EXTREME WEATHER CONDITIONS).............................................. 25 FIGURE 15. CROWN FIRE POTENTIAL (EXTREME WEATHER CONDITIONS)................................................... 26 FIGURE 16. MULTIPLE, CONFUSING ADDRESS MARKERS.............................................................................. 28 FIGURE 17. BROKEN ADDRESS MARKERS...................................................................................................... 28 FIGURE 18. CONFUSING, SIMILAR ROAD NAMES ........................................................................................... 29 FIGURE 19. UNSAFE BRIDGES......................................................................................................................... 29 FIGURE 20. EAST SIDE EVACUATION ROUTES ............................................................................................... 33 FIGURE 21. WEST SIDE EVACUATION ROUTES .............................................................................................. 34 FIGURE 22. WATER SUPPLY LOCATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA ...................................................................... 48 iv Elk Creek Fire Protection District September 2005 Community Wildfire Protection Plan LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. HAZARD RANKING OF COMMUNITIES IN THE STUDY AREA............................................................. 7 TABLE 2. CULTURAL SITES ............................................................................................................................ 12 TABLE 3. CONDITION CLASS DESCRIPTIONS.................................................................................................. 19 TABLE 4. RECOMMENDED TREATMENT DISTANCES FOR MID-SLOPE ROADS ............................................... 35 TABLE 5. HAZARD RATINGS BY COMMUNITY................................................................................................ 44 v Elk Creek Fire Protection District September 2005 Community Wildfire Protection Plan PURPOSE The purpose of the fire behavior analysis and community wildfire hazard rating is to provide a comprehensive, scientifically-based assessment of the wildfire hazards and risks within the Elk Creek Fire Protection District. The assessment estimates the risks, likelihood of the occurrence of a significant wildfire event and hazards, potential for deleterious and otherwise undesirable effects resulting from a moderately advancing wildfire, associated with wildland
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stenapa Newsletter
    STENAPA NEWSLETTER ST. EUSTATIUS NATIONAL PARKS OFFICE Her Royal Highness Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands visit- ed the St Eustatius National Parks Foundation (STENAPA) E v e n t s Office on Friday, December 13th. The Princess came from 2020 Made in Statia where On-site Manager, Adam Mitchell, spoke with her about the Reforestation Project. Read more about Marine Park the Reforestation Project on page 5. Info Series Annual Cleanup 2019 in a few words... ICCD We would say that it was a year of new faces and fresh approaches. Several staff members joined the team at the beginning of the year. Kids A nature agreement with the government was signed mid year as Summer Club the previous Director Clarissa Buma said goodbye to the team. Tak- Lionfish Fry ing up the reins of Director was biologist Erik Boman who was im- mediately tasked with upgrading operations from the injection of And MORE! funds released by the nature agreement. New board members also joined our ranks with Dr. Dorette Courtar becoming our Board Pres- Miriam C. Schmidt ident. Botanical Garden Continue reading our newsletter to see what the Parks, Garden, Re- Bird watching forestation Project and Education/Outreach have been up to! Birthdays Family Reunions The STENAPA Team Graduation Erik Boman Director Movie Nights Jessica Berkel Marine Park Manager School trips Francois Mille Marine Park Ranger Marit Pistor Marine Park Ranger Team Building Ervin Arnaud Botanical Garden Ranger Rupnor Redan Terrestrial Ranger Weddings Achsah Mitchell Education and Outreach Officer Workshops Adam Mitchell On-site Manager (ReforeStatia) $75 [$25 returned if Philippa King Reforestation Ranger left in a good state] NATIONAL MARINE PARK Unlike larger islands, St Eustatius is able to protect all of our surrounding waters with the National Ma- rine Park (up to a depth of 30 m).
    [Show full text]
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • LIFE on the FRONTLINE 2018 a Global Survey of the Working Conditions of Rangers PROJECT TEAM Mike Belecky, Rohit Singh & William Moreto
    REPORT 2018 LIFE ON THE FRONTLINE 2018 A global survey of the working conditions of rangers PROJECT TEAM Mike Belecky, Rohit Singh & William Moreto SPECIAL THANKS Rob Parry-Jones, Mike Baltzer, Drew McVey & Alain Ononino LAYOUT, DESIGN & ILLUSTRATION Catalyze COVER PHOTO © Greg Armfield / WWF © Simon Rawles / WWF-UK Published in October 2018 Disclaimer: The responses provided by rangers in this survey do not necessarily represent the position of WWF. 2 | Life on the Frontline CONTENTS Forewords 1 Dedication to Rangers 3 Executive Summary 5 The Ranger Survey In Context 7 Methodology Summary 9 Country Survey Sites 11 Global Overview 13 Africa 27 South Asia 39 Southeast Asia 51 Further Regional Comparison 63 China / Russia Tiger Landscape Case Study 65 Latin America Preview Survey 66 Recommendations 67 Acknowledgements 69 Life on the Frontline | 3 Forewords Sustainable Development Goal 15 aims to wildlife, the ILO will host a sectoral meeting on promoting decent work “protect, restore and promote sustainable use and safety and health in forestry in 2019. of terrestrial ecosystems, [and] sustainably manage forests.” When adopting this Goal To mark the centenary of the ILO in 2019, the International Labour among only 17 Sustainable Development Conference has decided to adopt a Convention and a Recommendation Goals, the international community on violence and harassment in the workplace, which is a main concern recognized that it must take action to protect of this report. During the first discussions in 2018, the workers’ the ecosystems that are home to more than representatives pointed out that violence at work may stem from public servants’ interaction with third parties, especially in dealing with 80 per cent of the terrestrial species of animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Evergreen Fire Protection District Jefferson and Clear Creek Counties, Colorado
    2020 Evergreen Fire Protection District Jefferson and Clear Creek Counties, Colorado F Community Wildfire Protection Plan EVERGREEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN 2020 UPDATE Prepared for Evergreen Fire/Rescue 1802 Bergen Pkwy, Evergreen, Colorado 80439 Prepared by Forest Stewards Guild 170 2nd Street SW Loveland, CO 80537 1 CONTENTS Evergreen Fire Protection District ............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................5 Evergreen’s Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) .......................................................................................................6 Fire History ..................................................................................................................................................................8 Catastrophic Wildfire – Common Factors .........................................................................................................9 Ignition Prevention ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Evergreen’s Preparedness for Wildfire ................................................................................................................. 11 Community Accomplishments since first CWPP .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Ranger School
    The Ranger School State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry Wanakena, New York The SUNY-ESF Ranger School in Wanakena, N.Y., offers students a unique educational experience in a spectacular natural setting. The Ranger School, part of the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry (ESF), confers the associate in applied science (A.A.S.) degree. The A.A.S. degree can open doors to forest technology, natural resources conservation or land surveying technology careers or it can serve as a hands-on, experience-based step toward a bachelor of science degree. The Ranger School’s one-plus-one plan allows students to complete their first- year degree requirements at the college of their choice, including ESF’s Syracuse campus if admitted as a first-year student. The second-year degree requirements are completed at The Ranger School. Many graduates continue on to complete a bach- elor’s degree program at the ESF Syracuse campus or other colleges and universities. The 2,800-acre campus, located in the heart of the six million-acre Adirondack Park, supports the field-based, hands-on education which is a hallmark of The Ranger School experience. Students learn to use equipment and tools specific to their academic program. The main campus building houses state-of-the-art facilities including classrooms, conference room, library, drafting lab and computer lab. Students also live in the building sharing comfortable residence hall rooms, eating and socializing in the dining center and spending their free time in the enter- tainment and recreation areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019
    REVIEW OF CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE EVACUATIONS FROM 2017 TO 2019 STEPHEN WONG, JACQUELYN BROADER, AND SUSAN SHAHEEN, PH.D. MARCH 2020 DOI: 10.7922/G2WW7FVK DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R Wong, Broader, Shaheen 2 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-19-b N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019 March 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Berkeley 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report Stephen D. Wong (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-3651), No. Jacquelyn C. Broader (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-955X), N/A Susan A. Shaheen, Ph.D. (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-856X) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley N/A 109 McLaughlin Hall, MC1720 11. Contract or Grant No. Berkeley, CA 94720-1720 UC-ITS-2019-19 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Covered www.ucits.org Final Report 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R 16. Abstract Between 2017 and 2019, California experienced a series of devastating wildfires that together led over one million people to be ordered to evacuate. Due to the speed of many of these wildfires, residents across California found themselves in challenging evacuation situations, often at night and with little time to escape. These evacuations placed considerable stress on public resources and infrastructure for both transportation and sheltering.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Processes 3Rd - 4Th Grade Field Trip Preparing for Your Trip
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Glacier National Park Forest Processes 3rd - 4th Grade Field Trip Preparing For Your Trip 1 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Glacier National Park Table of Contents Forest Processes 3rd-4th Grade Field Trip Read this FIRST! Dear Teacher ...................................................................................................... 3 Glacier’s Education Goals ................................................................................ 3 Suggested 5-Day Lesson Sequence around Field Trip ................................. 4 Preparing for Your Lesson 1- Pre-Visit- Mature Forest Mime ..................................................... 5 Field Trip Lesson 2- Pre-Visit- Old Growth Forest Mural ............................................. 8 Field Trip Information Field Trip- Objectives and Vocabulary ......................................................... 10 Field Trip- Schedule for the Day and Standards Alignment ..................... 11 Field Trip- Tips for a Successful Field Trip ................................................... 12 Field Trip- Chaperon Guidelines to Share with Parents ............................ 13 Field Trip- Sample Evaluation of Ranger and How Day Went ................. 14 Field Trip- Sample Ranger Evaluation of Class and How Day Went ........ 15 After Your Field Trip Lesson 3- Post- Visit- Forest Poems .............................................................. 16 Appendix Additional Teacher Background Information .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • CEE 189 Remote Sensing Jiaheng Hu CEE Department, Tufts University
    Forestation Change Detection in Los Angeles Wildfires Background Processes Wildfire is one of the most disastrous event around the world, as it Sand Fire Creek Fire burn large area of forest and often times it will also burn buildings and threaten human’s life. Wildfire is usually triggered by dry cli- mate, volcano ash, hot wind and so on, but can be caused by human as well: a used cigarette thrown by a visitor who is unaware of envi- ronmental protection, or illegally put on a fire by someone. Wildfire has become frequent in California these years. There were 64 wildfires in record in 2017, the figure on the right shows the area destroyed by wildfire. Many wildfires occur in national forest parks Landsat 8 Metadata for Sand Fire on August 9, 2016 Landsat 8 Metadata for Sand Fire on February 4, 2018 (Source: USGS Earth Explorer) (Source: USGS Earth Explorer) just adjacent to some big cities such as LA and San Francisco. 1. Resize 2. Create Water Mask Remote sensing has been developed for several decades and proved to be a useful tool for large-scale environmental moni- 6. Color Slicing toring, conservation goals, spatial analysis and natural re- 3. Radiometric Cali- sources manage- 4. Apply BAI bration ment. Float(b2)-float(b1) B1= BAI of Sand fire Two Sand fire (Jul 22, 2016-Aug 3, 2016) and Creek fire (Dec 5, 2017- B2= BAI of Creek fire Jan 9, 2018) happened in Angeles National Forest. It is worthwhile to evaluate the change after these two fires by using some index.
    [Show full text]
  • Cal Fire: Creek Fire Now the Largest Single Wildfire in California History
    Cal Fire: Creek Fire now the largest single wildfire in California history By Joe Jacquez Visalia Times-Delta, Wednesday, September 23, 2020 The Creek Fire is now the largest single, non-complex wildfire in California history, according to an update from Cal Fire. The fire has burned 286,519 acres as of Monday night and is 32 percent contained, according to Cal Fire. The Creek Fire, which began Sept. 4, is located in Big Creek, Huntington Lake, Shaver Lake, Mammoth Pool and San Joaquin River Canyon. Creek Fire damage realized There were approximately 82 Madera County structures destroyed in the blaze. Six of those structures were homes, according to Commander Bill Ward. There are still more damage assessments to be made as evacuation orders are lifted and converted to warnings. Madera County sheriff's deputies notified the residents whose homes were lost in the fire. The Fresno County side of the fire sustained significantly more damage, according to Truax. "We are working with (Fresno County) to come up with away to get that information out," Incident Commander Nick Truax said. California wildfires:Firefighters battle more than 25 major blazes, Bobcat Fire grows Of the 4,900 structures under assessment, 30% have been validated using Fresno and Madera counties assessor records. Related: 'It's just too dangerous': Firefighters make slow progress assessing Creek Fire damage So far, damage inspection teams have counted more than 300 destroyed structures and 32 damaged structures. "These are the areas we can safely get to," Truax said. "There are a lot of areas that trees have fallen across the roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Board of Directors, Aromas Tri-County Fire Protection District, County of Monterey, State of California
    AROMAS TRI-COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA Tuesday May 30, 2017 - 6:30 p.m. 492 Carpenteria Road, Aromas, California 95004 ROLL CALL: Miller __ Mahler __ Mortan Mesiroff______ Brown____ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Director Mesiroff PUBLIC COMMENT 6:30 P.M. - Opportunity to address the Board on items of interest not appearing on the agenda. No action may be taken unless provided by Government Code 54954.2 (speakers are limited to 5 minutes). The public may comment on any matter listed on the agenda at the time the matter is being considered by the Board. DIRECTORS COMMENT PERIOD APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1 Approve minutes of the March 23, 2017 regular meeting. ACTION PUBLIC HEARING 6:35 P.M. Preliminary Budget for fiscal year 2017-18 2 Receive proposed final budget of $1,656,600 for fiscal year 2017-18 2a. Receive public comment on the proposed final budget. 2b. Consider and approve Resolution No. 2017-05 adopting a preliminary budget of $1,656,600 for fiscal year 2017-18. ACTION GENERAL BUSINESS 3 Receive report of operations, training and fire prevention. 4 Receive staff report on Financial Audit Services. 5 Receive and consider staff report and CSG Consultants contract. ACTION FINANCIAL 6 Approve checks for April and May 2017. 7 Receive budget status report. Any documents produced by Aromas Tri-County Fire Protection District and distributed to a majority of the board 1 regarding any item on the agenda will be made available at the Aromas fire station located at 492 Carpenteria, Aromas, CA during normal business hours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Costs and Losses of Wildfires a Literature Review
    NIST Special Publication 1215 The Costs and Losses of Wildfires A Literature Review Douglas Thomas David Butry Stanley Gilbert David Webb Juan Fung This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1215 NIST Special Publication 1215 The Costs and Losses of Wildfires A Literature Survey Douglas Thomas David Butry Stanley Gilbert David Webb Juan Fung Applied Economics Office Engineering Laboratory This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1215 November 2017 U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Walter Copan, NIST Director and Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. Photo Credit: Lake City, Fla., May 15, 2007 -- The Florida Bugaboo Fire still rages out of control in some locations. FEMA Photo by Mark Wolfe - May 14, 2007 - Location: Lake City, FL: https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/images/51316 National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 1215 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 1215, 72 pages (October 2017) CODEN: NSPUE2 This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1215 Abstract This report enumerates all possible costs of wildfire management and wildfire-related losses.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRE DEPARTMENT TOWN 106 Rural Fire District Association Newkirk Adair County Tri Community Volunteer Fire Dept
    FIRE DEPARTMENT TOWN 106 Rural Fire District Association Newkirk Adair County Tri Community Volunteer Fire Dept. Stilwell Airport Road Fire Support Incorporated Bartlesville Albany Volunteer Fire Department Albany Albion Fire Department Association Albion Alden Fire Department Association Carnegie Alfalfa Rural Fire Company Carnegie Arlington Volunteer Fire Dept. Incorporated Prague Arrowhead Estates Voluntary Fire Department, Inc. Canadian Ash Creek Community Fire Department Inc. Wilburton Ashland Volunteer Fire Dept Association Stuart Baker Fire Protection Association Turpin Bar C Rural Fire Department, Inc Burbank Barnsdall Rural Fire Association Incorporated Barnsdall Basin Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. Mannford Bear Creek Rural Fire District Association Kaw City Bee Community Volunteer Fire Department Association Kenefic Bell Rural Fire Department Inc Stilwell Bengal Fire Department Assn Wister Bennington Community Rural Volunteer Fire Department Assoc. Bennington Bennington Bentley Volunteer Fire District Atoka Berlin Volunteer Fire Association Sayre Berryhill Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. Tulsa Bethel Road Fire Department Association Lawton Big 4 Rural Fire District Association Kingfisher Big Beaver Fire Department Inc. Shidler Big Bend Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Ralston Big Cedar Volunteer Fire Dept., Inc. Muse Black Dog Fire Association Tulsa Blackburn Rural Fire Department Pawnee Blackgum Mountain Fire Department Vian Blackland Fire Corporation Pawhuska Blue Volunteer Fire Association McAlester Bluff Fire Department Inc Soper Boggy Fire Department Association Red Oak Boulanger Rural Fire Dept. Inc. Pawhuska Bowlin Springs Fire Protection Association Chelsea Brent Rural Fire District Inc. Sallisaw Bridge Creek Fire Fighters Association Blanchard Brooken Volunteer Fire Department Stigler Brooksville Volunteer Fire Dept Corporation Tecumseh Broxton Fire Dept. Company Assn. Fort Cobb Brushy Mt. Vol. Fire Dept. Muskogee Brushy Mt.-Sequoyah Co.
    [Show full text]