DOCSLIB.ORG

2007 Fire Activity Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2007 Fire Activity Report U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE Regional Map Akaska REGION 7 Pacific REGION 1 Mountain - Prairie Northeast REGION 6 REGION 5 Great Lakes-Big Rivers California and Nevada REGION 3 REGION 8 Southeast Southwest REGION 4 REGION 2 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 2007 Fire Statistics Regional Map .............................................................................................................. i Regional Activity Summaries Pacific .............................................................................................................. 1 Southwest ........................................................................................................ 5 Great Lakes-Big River .................................................................................... 8 Southeast ......................................................................................................... 12 Northeast ......................................................................................................... 18 Mountain-Prairie ............................................................................................. 24 Alaska .............................................................................................................. 28 California and Nevada...................................................................................... 41 Wildfires Fire Activity Map ............................................................................................. 50 Number / Acres ............................................................................................... 51 By State ........................................................................................................... 52 By Refuge Pacific .................................................................................................. 54 Southwest ............................................................................................ 55 Great Lakes-Big Rivers ....................................................................... 56 Southeast ............................................................................................. 57 Northeast ............................................................................................. 59 Mountain-Prairie ................................................................................. 60 Alaska .................................................................................................. 61 California and Nevada........................................................................... 62 By Cause .......................................................................................................... 63 By Size Class ................................................................................................... 63 10-Day Period .................................................................................................. 64 Treatments (Non-WUI) Activity Map .................................................................................................... 65 Number / Acres ............................................................................................... 66 By State ........................................................................................................... 67 By Refuge Pacific .................................................................................................. 69 Southwest ............................................................................................ 70 Great Lakes-Big Rivers ....................................................................... 71 Southeast ............................................................................................. 73 Northeast ............................................................................................. 74 Mountain-Prairie ................................................................................. 75 Alaska .................................................................................................. 77 California and Nevada........................................................................... 78 Wildland-Urban Interface Treatments Activity Map .................................................................................................... 79 Number / Acres................................................................................................ 80 By State ........................................................................................................... 81 By Refuge Pacific .................................................................................................. 83 Southwest ............................................................................................ 84 Great Lakes-Big Rivers ....................................................................... 85 Southeast ............................................................................................. 86 Northeast ............................................................................................ 88 Mountain-Prairie ................................................................................. 89 Alaska .................................................................................................. 90 California and Nevada........................................................................... 91 2003 - 2007 Statistics Pacific .................................................................................................. 92 Southwest ............................................................................................ 95 Great Lakes-Big Rivers ....................................................................... 98 Southeast ............................................................................................. 101 Northeast ............................................................................................. 104 Mountain-Prairie ................................................................................. 107 Alaska .................................................................................................. 110 California and Nevada........................................................................... 113 Regions 1-7 .................................................................................................................. 116 False Alarms ................................................................................................................ 119 Support Actions ........................................................................................................... 119 1998 - 2007 Statistics Wildfires ...................................................................................................................... 120 Treatments ................................................................................................................... 121 Department of the Interior 2003 - 2007 Wildfires ...................................................................................................................... 122 Treatments ................................................................................................................... 123 PACIFIC REGION Although the Pacific Northwest The four major fires affecting FWS experienced a relatively normal fire lands all occurred in and around the Mid season, the Eastern Great Basin Columbia NWRC. The largest of these, experienced an exceptionally dry and the Wautoma Fire was a Type 2 incident severe one. One type 2 and numerous totaling more than 72,000 acres. Three type 3, 4 and 5 fires occurred on FWS other large fires, “Upper Goose,” lands within the Region. In addition to “Overlook,” and “MP 17” burned suppressing fires on Service-managed approximately 27,000 acres on Refuge lands, the Region actively provided lands. The Richland-based SEAT was interagency assistance both in and out used on all four of these incidents and of Region. was instrumental in their suppression. The SEAT also responded to fires on The Region’s 2007 fire season started in adjacent private lands. early June and lasted into September. Idaho was the most severely impacted All four fires occurred on sage-step with numerous large fires, including communities, and directly impacted several Type 1 incidents such as the pristine habitat. A private consulting Cascade Complex, Murphy Complex, firm was used to prepare the BAER plan and East Zone Complex. Oregon and for rehabilitation and stabilization of Washington also experienced numerous impacted Refuge lands. This was the large fires, of which several directly first time a private firm was used to impacted FWS managed lands. For the develop such extensive plans. The year, Idaho led the Region with over 2.7 $220,000 expenditure for contracting million acres burned. resulted in $16.9 million worth of funded rehabilitation/stabilization Severity funds were requested on an projects. interagency basis for Refuges in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. Dungeness NWR on the Pacific Coast Extended staffing levels were had a 50-acre fire in grass that burned implemented for Sheldon-Hart right up to Puget Sound. This type 4 Mountain, Malheur, Columbia, Little incident is the largest fire the Refuge Pend Oreille, Turnbull and the experienced in decades and is illustrative Southeast Idaho Complex Refuges. A of the hot and dry conditions of the 2007 single engine air tanker (SEAT) was fire season. The interagency response to contracted to service Mid-Columbia, this fire included Washington State DNR Columbia, and Hanford/Saddle and NPS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Cert Petition
    No. 18-____ IN THE Supreme Court of the United States SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ Of Certiorari to the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Jeffrey N. Boozell Kathleen M. Sullivan QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART Counsel of Record & SULLIVAN, LLP Stephanie N. Solomon 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART Los Angeles, CA & SULLIVAN, LLP (213) 443-3200 51 Madison Ave., 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 (212) 849-7000 kathleensullivan@ quinnemanuel.com April 30, 2019 Counsel for Petitioner i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether it is an uncompensated taking for public use in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amend- ments for a State to impose strict liaBility for inverse condemnation on a privately owned utility without ensuring that the cost of that liaBility is spread to the Benefitted ratepayers. ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING The following were parties to the proceeding Be- fore the California court of appeal: 1. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (“SDG&E”), Peti- tioner in this Court, was Petitioner Below. 2. The Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Respondent in this Court, was Respond- ent Below. 3. Protect Our Communities Foundation was a Real Party in Interest Below. 4. The Utility Reform Network was a Real Party in Interest Below. 5. Utility Consumers Action Network was a Real Party in Interest Below. 6. Ruth Hendricks was a Real Party in Interest Below. 7. San Diego Consumers’ Action Network was a Real Party in Interest Below.
    [Show full text]
  • PROPOSED DECISION Agenda ID #15940 (Rev
    ALJ/SPT/SL5/ek4 PROPOSED DECISION Agenda ID #15940 (Rev. 1) Ratesetting 11/30/20172017, Item #40 Decision PROPOSED DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES’ TSEN AND GOLDBERG (Mailed 8/22/17) BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U902E) for Authorization to Application 15-09-010 Recover Costs Related to the 2007 Southern California Wildfires Recorded in the Wildfire Expense Memorandum Account (WEMA). DECISION DENYING APPLICATION 198906427197851767 - 1 - RA.15-09-010 ALJ/SPT/SL5/ek4 PROPOSED DECISION (Rev. 1) Table of Contents Title Page DECISION DENYING APPLICATION 1 PROPOSED DECISION DENYING APPLICATION 2 Summary 2 1. Factual Background 2 2. Procedural Background 3 3. Burden of Proof 8Legal Standards Applied9 4. Reasonableness Review: Prudent Manager Standard 9 5. Discussion and Analysis 911 5.1.4.1. Witch Fire 911 5.1.1.4.1.1. Witch Fire Background 911 5.1.2.4.1.2.SDG&E’s Position on its Operation and Management of its Facilities 4.1.3 ORA’s Position on SDG&E’s Operation and Management of its Facilities Prior to the Witch Fire 1321 5.1.3.4.1.4.Intervenors’ Position on SDG&E’s Operation and Management of its 5.1.4.4.1.5.Reasonableness Review: SDG&E’s Operation and Management of its 5.2.4.2. Guejito Fire 2729 5.2.1.4.2.1. Guejito Fire Background 27 5.2.2. SDG&E’s Position on its Operation and Management of its Facilities Prior to the Guejito Fire 29 5.2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Codes Used in the Kern River Valley
    i The Kern River Valley Community Fire Safe Plan Created by HangFire Environmental for the Kern River Fire Safe Council and the citizens they strive to protect. October 2002 The Kern River Valley Community Fire Safe Plan was funded by a grant to the Kern River Valley Fire Safe Council by the United States Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, National Fire Plan-Economic Action Program. In accordance with Federal law and United States Department of Agriculture policy, Kern River Valley Fire Safe Council in cooperation with the Kern River Valley Revitalization Incorporated is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). To file a complaint of discrimination, write the United States Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue,. SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202)720-5964 (voice or TDD). The United States Department of Agriculture-Forest Service is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ii Table of Contents Kern River Valley Community Wildfire Protection Plan................................................................i The Kern River Valley Community Fire Safe Plan........................................................................ii Table of Contents...........................................................................................................................iii Introduction.....................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity
    fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Fires in San Diego County History
    Major fires in San Diego County history September 1913: Barona fire burned 65,470 acres. September 1928: Witch Creek fire near Santa Ysabel charred 33,240 acres. September 1928: Beauty Peak fire near the Riverside County border in the North County blackened 67,000 acres. October 1943: Hauser Creek fire in the Cleveland National Forest, at least 9 firefighters dead (including 7 marines), 72 injuries and 10,000 acres burned. August 1944: Laguna Junction fire burned 60,000 acres August 1950: Conejos Fire charred 64,000 acres. [Month unknown] 1952: Cuyamaca fire burned 64,000 acres November 1956: Inaja fire killed 11 firefighters and burned 43,904 acres near Julian. September 26-Oct. 3 1970: The Laguna fire, the county's largest fire in modern times, burned 175,425 acres, killed eight people and destroyed 382 homes. In 24 hours the fire burned from near Mount Laguna into the outskirts of El Cajon and Spring Valley. September 1978: PSA Crash in North Park June 1985: Normal Heights fire destroyed or damaged 116 houses, causing $8.6 million in damage. October 1993: Guejito fire east of Escondido charred 20,000 acres and destroyed 18 houses. Estimated $1.25 million damage. October 1996: Harmony Grove fire burned 8,600 acres, from Harmony Grove west of Escondido to La Costa, destroying nearly 110 homes and killing one man. August 1997: Lake Wohlford fire northeast of Escondido - an arson blaze - destroyed seven houses and burned 500 acres. October 1999: La Jolla Fire (La Jolla Indian Reservation) burned approximately 7,800 acres and 1 firefighter died.
    [Show full text]
  • Evergreen Fire Protection District Jefferson and Clear Creek Counties, Colorado
    2020 Evergreen Fire Protection District Jefferson and Clear Creek Counties, Colorado F Community Wildfire Protection Plan EVERGREEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN 2020 UPDATE Prepared for Evergreen Fire/Rescue 1802 Bergen Pkwy, Evergreen, Colorado 80439 Prepared by Forest Stewards Guild 170 2nd Street SW Loveland, CO 80537 1 CONTENTS Evergreen Fire Protection District ............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................5 Evergreen’s Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) .......................................................................................................6 Fire History ..................................................................................................................................................................8 Catastrophic Wildfire – Common Factors .........................................................................................................9 Ignition Prevention ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Evergreen’s Preparedness for Wildfire ................................................................................................................. 11 Community Accomplishments since first CWPP .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Vulnerability Assessment for Mendocino County ______
    FIRE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR MENDOCINO COUNTY ____________________________________________ _________________________________________ August 2020 Mendocino County Fire Vulnerability Assessment ________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I- OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 6 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 B. Project Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 6 C. Mendocino County Description and Demographics ................................................................ 7 D. Planning Area Basis .................................................................................................................. 8 SECTION II- COUNTY WILDFIRE ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 9 A. Wildfire Threat ......................................................................................................................... 9 B. Weather/Climate ........................................................................................................................ 9 C. Topography ............................................................................................................................. 10 D. Fuel Hazards ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019
    REVIEW OF CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE EVACUATIONS FROM 2017 TO 2019 STEPHEN WONG, JACQUELYN BROADER, AND SUSAN SHAHEEN, PH.D. MARCH 2020 DOI: 10.7922/G2WW7FVK DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R Wong, Broader, Shaheen 2 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-19-b N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019 March 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Berkeley 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report Stephen D. Wong (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-3651), No. Jacquelyn C. Broader (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-955X), N/A Susan A. Shaheen, Ph.D. (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-856X) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley N/A 109 McLaughlin Hall, MC1720 11. Contract or Grant No. Berkeley, CA 94720-1720 UC-ITS-2019-19 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Covered www.ucits.org Final Report 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R 16. Abstract Between 2017 and 2019, California experienced a series of devastating wildfires that together led over one million people to be ordered to evacuate. Due to the speed of many of these wildfires, residents across California found themselves in challenging evacuation situations, often at night and with little time to escape. These evacuations placed considerable stress on public resources and infrastructure for both transportation and sheltering.
    [Show full text]
  • Is It a Red Flag Day?
    Is it a Red Flag Day? A Special Section on the Social Aspects of Wildfire Presented by the National Park Service in cooperation with Project Learning Tree, the Fire Prevention Officers of Marin County, and the Marin Independent Journal Advertising Department 2 Fire Recycles ildland fire is an plant particles while the larger material AIR SUN W ecological remains as ash. process affecting almost Ash returns nutrients from plants back all of the earth's vegeta- into the soil, especially calcium, potassi- tion. Underwater plants um and phosphorous. Nitrogen is are generally an returned by the nitrogen-fixing plants that PLANTS excpetion, although flourish after a fire and begin the process FIRE when seaweed or algae of regrowth. Without nitrogen, proteins are left onshore to dry, cannot be made, and DNA cannot be SOIL they too, can become fuel. reproduced. In some places, wildland fire occurs regularly enough that Most of the earth's nitrogen is in the species depend on it. air, but can’t be breathed in. Nitrogen-fix- What's Inside ers host bacteria in their roots which The length of a fire return interval, or convert atmospheric nitrogen into a form Fire Recycles . 2 "fire cycle" varies based on the climate, plants and animals can use. Defensible Space vegetation, and ignition frequency of a Like many hardwood trees, shrubs and other Perspectives. 3 particular location. Ignitions are mainly Plants in the pea family (legumes) are flowering plants, this California bay survived caused by lightning, volcanic ash, lava, notorious for their nitrogen fixing abilities. a wildfire by resprouting at the base.
    [Show full text]
  • CEE 189 Remote Sensing Jiaheng Hu CEE Department, Tufts University
    Forestation Change Detection in Los Angeles Wildfires Background Processes Wildfire is one of the most disastrous event around the world, as it Sand Fire Creek Fire burn large area of forest and often times it will also burn buildings and threaten human’s life. Wildfire is usually triggered by dry cli- mate, volcano ash, hot wind and so on, but can be caused by human as well: a used cigarette thrown by a visitor who is unaware of envi- ronmental protection, or illegally put on a fire by someone. Wildfire has become frequent in California these years. There were 64 wildfires in record in 2017, the figure on the right shows the area destroyed by wildfire. Many wildfires occur in national forest parks Landsat 8 Metadata for Sand Fire on August 9, 2016 Landsat 8 Metadata for Sand Fire on February 4, 2018 (Source: USGS Earth Explorer) (Source: USGS Earth Explorer) just adjacent to some big cities such as LA and San Francisco. 1. Resize 2. Create Water Mask Remote sensing has been developed for several decades and proved to be a useful tool for large-scale environmental moni- 6. Color Slicing toring, conservation goals, spatial analysis and natural re- 3. Radiometric Cali- sources manage- 4. Apply BAI bration ment. Float(b2)-float(b1) B1= BAI of Sand fire Two Sand fire (Jul 22, 2016-Aug 3, 2016) and Creek fire (Dec 5, 2017- B2= BAI of Creek fire Jan 9, 2018) happened in Angeles National Forest. It is worthwhile to evaluate the change after these two fires by using some index.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Fresno-Kings Unit Fire Plan
    Fresno-Kings Unit 5/03/2020 UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Numbers Description Updated Date Section Updated Updated of Update By 4/30/20 Appendix A 36-38 Fire Plan Projects B. Garabedian 4/30/20 Appendix B 40-41 Added Wildland Activity B. Garabedian Chart 4/30/20 Appendix C 42 Update Ignition Data B. Garabedian 4/30/20 Various 103-119 2019 Accomplishment B. Garabedian i TABLE OF CONTENTS UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS .................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... ii SIGNATURE PAGE ............................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 3 UNIT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 FIRE HISTORY ................................................................................................................................ 4 UNIT PREPAREDNESS AND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES ..................................................... 4 SECTION II: COLLABORATION..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]