DOCSLIB.ORG

Fire Codes Used in the Kern River Valley

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fire Codes Used in the Kern River Valley i The Kern River Valley Community Fire Safe Plan Created by HangFire Environmental for the Kern River Fire Safe Council and the citizens they strive to protect. October 2002 The Kern River Valley Community Fire Safe Plan was funded by a grant to the Kern River Valley Fire Safe Council by the United States Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, National Fire Plan-Economic Action Program. In accordance with Federal law and United States Department of Agriculture policy, Kern River Valley Fire Safe Council in cooperation with the Kern River Valley Revitalization Incorporated is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). To file a complaint of discrimination, write the United States Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue,. SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202)720-5964 (voice or TDD). The United States Department of Agriculture-Forest Service is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ii Table of Contents Kern River Valley Community Wildfire Protection Plan................................................................i The Kern River Valley Community Fire Safe Plan........................................................................ii Table of Contents...........................................................................................................................iii Introduction.....................................................................................................................................1 The Assessment Process.................................................................................................................2 Fire Behavior..................................................................................................................................4 Hazardous Fuels..............................................................................................................................5 Fuel Ranking Methodology:...........................................................................................................7 Slope...............................................................................................................................................8 Fire History...................................................................................................................................13 Final Fuel Ranking........................................................................................................................13 Assets at Risk................................................................................................................................17 Structure Density......................................................................................................................17 Ecological Sensitive Areas.......................................................................................................21 Recreational Areas....................................................................................................................24 Pristine Areas............................................................................................................................26 Grazing Lands...........................................................................................................................28 Total Asset Ranking..................................................................................................................30 Other Factors that Influence Risk.................................................................................................32 Introduction...............................................................................................................................32 Ignitions....................................................................................................................................32 Ignition Density........................................................................................................................32 Fire Cause Analysis..................................................................................................................37 Local versus Out of Town Residency.......................................................................................40 Weather Analysis......................................................................................................................42 Response Time..........................................................................................................................48 Proposed Actions based on the Results of the Analysis...............................................................52 General Recommendations:......................................................................................................52 New Code Adoption.............................................................................................................52 Feasibility Study for the Potential Deployment of a Type One Helitanker..........................53 Develop School Programs aimed at Elementary, Middle, and High School Students.........53 Fire Cause Determination and Tracking System..................................................................54 Fuel Reduction and Fire Management Workshop................................................................55 Develop a Homeowners Guide to Living in the Forest; Neighborhood Fire Plan................56 Enforcement of Address Posting Codes...............................................................................57 Perform Neighborhood Assessments and Produce a Structure Protection Plan...................57 Specific Recommendations.......................................................................................................59 Alta Sierra Project.................................................................................................................59 Bodfish Project......................................................................................................................68 Kernville Project...................................................................................................................76 Squirrel Mountain Valley Project.........................................................................................80 Pala Ranch Project................................................................................................................80 Yankee Canyon Project.........................................................................................................82 Recommended Building Materials...............................................................................................85 iii Vents, eaves, and soffits............................................................................................................85 Decks.........................................................................................................................................85 Fully enclosed decks.................................................................................................................87 Roofing.....................................................................................................................................87 Exterior walls: siding................................................................................................................89 Windows & Glass.....................................................................................................................90 Exterior window covers, shutters, screens................................................................................91 Low E glass...............................................................................................................................92 Doors.........................................................................................................................................93 Current and Potential Funding Sources:.......................................................................................94 Appendix A-Fuel Model Guide..................................................................................................106 Appendix B-Fuel Ranking Details..............................................................................................109 Fuel Ranking Matrix...............................................................................................................110 Appendix C-Characterizing the Fire Threat to Wildland-Urban Interface Areas in California111 Appendix D- Fire Codes used in the Kern River Valley............................................................119 Appendix E-Glossary..................................................................................................................126 Appendix F- Community Wildfire Protection Plan Updates......................................................132 Appendix G- Kern River Valley Fuel Reduction Projects..........................................................133 Appendix H – Myers Canyon Community Wildfire Protection Plan.........................................134 Appendix I – Alta Sierra Community Wildfire Protection PlanIndex of Tables........................135 Index of Tables...........................................................................................................................136 Index of Maps.............................................................................................................................137
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity
    fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Vulnerability Assessment for Mendocino County ______
    FIRE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR MENDOCINO COUNTY ____________________________________________ _________________________________________ August 2020 Mendocino County Fire Vulnerability Assessment ________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I- OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 6 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 B. Project Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 6 C. Mendocino County Description and Demographics ................................................................ 7 D. Planning Area Basis .................................................................................................................. 8 SECTION II- COUNTY WILDFIRE ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 9 A. Wildfire Threat ......................................................................................................................... 9 B. Weather/Climate ........................................................................................................................ 9 C. Topography ............................................................................................................................. 10 D. Fuel Hazards ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Order 0513-21-09 Kern River Ranger
    ORDER NO. 0513-21-09 SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST KERN RIVER RANGER DISTRICT KERN CANYON AND ISABELLA LAKE GLASS CONTAINER PROHIBITION Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 551 and 36 C.F.R. § 261.50(a), and to provide for public safety, the following act is prohibited within the Kern River Ranger District of the Sequoia National Forest. This Order is effective from May 1, 2021 through April 30, 2023. Possessing or storing food or beverages in glass containers in the Kern Canyon and Isabella Lake Glass Container Prohibition Areas, as described on Exhibit A, and shown on Exhibits B, C, and D. 36 C.F.R. § 261.58(cc). Pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 261.50(e), the following persons are exempt from this Order: Any Federal, State, or local officer, or member of an organized rescue or fire fighting force in the performance of an official duty. This prohibition is in addition to the general prohibitions in 36 C.F.R. Part § 261, Subpart A. A violation of this prohibition is punishable by a fine of not more than $5,000 for an individual or $10,000 for an organization, or imprisonment for not more than six months, or both. 16 U.S.C. § 551 and 18 U.S.C. §§ 3559, 3571, and 3581. Done at Porterville, California, this 13th day of April, 2021. TERESA BENSON Forest Supervisor Sequoia National Forest ORDER NO. 0513-21-09 SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST KERN RIVER RANGER DISTRICT KERN CANYON AND ISABELLA LAKE GLASS CONTAINER PROHIBITION EXHIBIT A The Kern Canyon and Isabella Lake Glass Container Prohibition Area is comprised of three segments.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Description of Contractors and Exchange Partners
    Final EA-15-022 Appendix A Description of Contractors and Exchange Partners Summary of Cross Valley Contractors The following description characterizes each Cross Valley Contractor and associated subcontractor: County of Fresno The County of Fresno has a water service contract (Contract No. 14-06-200-8292A-IR15) for up to 3,000 acre-feet per year (AFY) that is provided for municipal and industrial (M&I) uses to specific developments within its CVP service area. The County draws its water directly from Millerton Lake after its Delta supply has been exchanged for Friant supplies with Arvin-Edison Water Storage District (Arvin-Edison). The County’s CVP water supplies have been administered by Arvin-Edison for the last 20 years pursuant to an agreement between the County and Arvin-Edison. County of Tulare The County of Tulare has a water service contract (Contract No. 14-06-200-8293A-IR15) for up to 5,308 AFY of water. The County of Tulare is comprised of 10 subcontractors (both agricultural and M&I) and all are located in the same geographical area as the Friant Division Contractors. Of the 10 subcontractors, only five have routinely taken water deliveries via the County of Tulare’s contract in recent years. The County of Tulare’s CVP contract supply is divided among the 10 subcontractors as shown below: Alpaugh Irrigation District (Alpaugh) – up to 100 AFY (agricultural) Atwell Island Water District (Atwell Island) – up to 50 AFY (agricultural) City of Lindsay – up to 50 AFY (M&I) City of Visalia – up to 300 AFY (M&I) Fransinetto Farms LLC – up to 400 AFY (agricultural) Hills Valley Irrigation District (Hills Valley) – up to 2,913 AFY (agricultural) Saucelito Irrigation District (Saucelito) – up to 100 AFY (agricultural) Stone Corral Irrigation District (Stone Corral) – up to 950 AFY (agricultural) Strathmore Public Utility District (Strathmore) – up to 400 AFY (M&I) Styro-Tek, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • About Kern County • Background Kern County • Water Use • Water Sources R.I
    Water in Bakersfield and Kern County About Kern County • Background Kern County • Water use • Water sources R.I. Connecticut 1,212 sq. mi. • Entities that control water 5,018 sq. mi. • Groundwater recharge Delaware 2,045 sq. mi. Area 8,170 sq. mi. – Kern County covers 5.21 million Sources: acres, roughly the area of Tom Haslebacher, Kern County Water Agency Connecticut, Delaware and Rhode Jon Parker, Kern Water Bank Authority Island. About Kern County About Kern County Delano Kernville Area Ridgecrest McFarland About one-third of Inyokern Wasco Kern’s area is on Shafter the valley floor, Oildale BAKERSFIELD which is intensively Population Lamont cultivated. Kern County’s Arvin California City Taft There are 860,000 irrigated acres population is Tehachapi 677,400. It is one of on the valley floor, one-third of Maricopa which are permanent crops. the fastest growing counties in the state, Kern consistently ranks 3rd or 4th in growing 19% since the state in value of production. 1995, and about 2% per year. Kern is California’s 14th most populous county. Annual water usage in Kern County: Municipal and industrial - 182,000 acre-feet Agricultural - 2,250,000 acre-feet 1 Gross Water Supplies and Net Water Requirements San Joaquin Valley Portion of Kern County Acre-Feet July 5, 2001 4,500,000 4,000,000 Additions to Kern County water sources: 3,500,000 Groundwater Storage 3,000,000 Kern River - 22% 2,500,000 Withdrawals from 2,000,000 Groundwater Storage State Water Project (California Aqueduct) - 1,500,000 23% 1,000,000 500,000 Federal (Friant-Kern
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • Living with Wildfire in Mendocino County
    LIVING WITH WILDFIRE IN MENDOCINO COUNTY Protecting OURSelveS, OUR property, AND OUR NATURAL RESourceS FOREST FACTS ... WHEN TO MOW ... RESCUING YOUR HORSES ... SAFE growing PRACTICES BURN PILES ... FIRE WATER SUPPLY ... AND MORE! The reality of wildfire A Mendocino scenario Suddenly the water stops flowing. The one wildfire can move. And they don’t know power line along the road has burned, so that most people killed by wildfires die IT’S A HOT DAY in early October. It’s 2:30 the pump has quit. Phones go dead too. while trying to evacuate—too late. and the afternoon wind has just kicked up. There’s been no rain since May, and Now really in panic, Joe and Barbara make Fire engines from other counties begin everything is tinder dry. Our CDF air one last attempt to capture their animals. to arrive. They check in with the chief in tankers, command plane, and helicopter With heavy hearts, they leave without them. charge. He tells them to stop at the local are fighting a fire near Santa Cruz. Nearly fire station for maps. In the confusion, The drive downhill takes a long time. In half our county’s fire engines are near L.A., the maps can’t be found. Radio waves are places the road is only one lane, so they where160 homes burned earlier this week. jammed and instructions aren’t clear. must back up to turnouts to let fire engines A wildfire breaks out in Mendocino County. pass. Other cars are collecting behind A fire chief from Napa is assigned to them, making matters worse.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoma-Lake-Napa Unit 2020 Strategic Fire Plan
    Figure: 1 Capell Incident Sonoma-Lake-Napa Unit 2020 Strategic Fire Plan Unit Strategic Fire Plan Amendments Description of Updated Date Section Updated Page Numbers Updated Update By 5/26/2020 ALL ALL Annual Update S.Cardwell 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE ........................................................................................................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 5 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 6 SECTION II: UNIT PREPAREDNESS AND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES ............... 9 SECTION III: VALUES .................................................................................................. 12 History of Large Fires ................................................................................................. 12 Values at Risk ............................................................................................................ 12 Section IV: PRE-FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATAGIES & TACTICS ........................... 13 Communication and Collaboration ............................................................................. 13 Pre-Fire Planning ....................................................................................................... 14 Section V: MONITORING PROGRAMS EFFECTIVNESS .......................................... 16 Emergency Command Center ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ojai Community Builds Wildfire Resilience
    Best Practices Federal Emergency Management Agency / Region IX February 2019 Disaster Mitigation Working in California Ojai Community Builds Wildfire Resilience Ventura County, CA Since its founding in 1874 the beautiful town of Ojai, ringed by rugged mountains and steep chaparral-covered can- yons, has been threatened with de- struction at least nine times. The Wheeler and Day Fires in 1985 and 2006 burned over 280,000 acres and destroyed homes and other struc- tures near the town. The Ojai com- munity placed a bronze plaque to express gratitude for the heroism of firefighters who successfully battled the Wheeler Fire during extremely dangerous conditions. years; developed high-quality years of Ojai Valley preparation Those experiences brought an online resources; and built strong and planning. Extremely hot, dry awareness of vulnerability, along effective partnerships with the and windy conditions caused that with a determination to become a USDA Forest Service, Ventura fire to grow and move with incredi- wildfire resilient community. Ojai County Fire Protection District, ble speed. Readiness and detailed Valley residents realized that aware- City of Ojai, County of Ventura, evacuations plans were critically ness and vigilance alone would not Ventura County Sheriff Depart- important, since the two-lane coun- suffice. To develop a plan of action ment, Ventura County Resource ty egress roads can be overwhelmed a group of fire professionals, educa- Conservation District and others. by traffic. Fortunately, the wind tors, insurance experts, homeowner direction during the Thomas Fire associations and others formed the The board of directors and adviso- spared the City of Ojai the fate of Ojai Valley Fire Safe Council ry council have been able to effec- Paradise, California, but this lesson (OVFSC), a nonprofit organization tively engage and coordinate with has not been lost on the Ojai Valley dedicated to promoting wildfire other agencies, organizations, vol- community.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2012 to 03/31/2012 Sequoia National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2012 to 03/31/2012 Sequoia National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management In Progress: Expected:03/2012 01/2013 Noel Schneeberger United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) DEIS NOA in Federal Register 610-557-4121 Approach 09/19/2008 [email protected]. EIS Est. FEIS NOA in Federal us Register 12/2011 Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. Nationwide. Land Management Planning - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2011 12/2011 Larry Hayden Rule Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 202-205-1559 EIS 02/25/2011 [email protected] Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 11/2011 Description: The Department of Agriculture proposes to promulgate a new planning rule, which will set out the process for development, revision, and amendment of National Forest System land management plans. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/planningrule Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. Agency-wide Rule. Nationwide Aerial Application - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2011 01/2012 Glen Stein of Fire Retardant on National Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 208-869-5405 Forest System Lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of December 1966 in the Kern-Kaweah Area, Kern and Tulare Counties, California
    Floods of December 1966 in the Kern-Kaweah Area, Kern and Tulare Counties, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1870-C Floods of December 1966 in the Kern-Kaweah Area, Kern and Tulare Counties, California By WILLARD W. DEAN fPith a section on GEOMORPHIC EFFECTS IN THE KERN RIVER BASIN By KEVIN M. SCOTT FLOODS OF 1966 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1870-C UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-610922 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 45 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract_____________________________________________________ Cl Introduction.____________ _ ________________________________________ 1 Acknowledgments. ________________________________________________ 3 Precipitation__ ____________________________________________________ 5 General description of the floods___________________________________ 9 Kern River basin______________________________________________ 12 Tule River basin______________________________________________ 16 Kaweah River basin____________________________--_-____-_---_- 18 Miscellaneous basins___________________________________________ 22 Storage regulation _________________________________________________ 22 Flood damage.__________________________________________________ 23 Comparison to previous floods___________-_____________--___------_
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Fire Activity Report
    U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE Regional Map Akaska REGION 7 Pacific REGION 1 Mountain - Prairie Northeast REGION 6 REGION 5 Great Lakes-Big Rivers California and Nevada REGION 3 REGION 8 Southeast Southwest REGION 4 REGION 2 i TABLE OF CONTENTS 2007 Fire Statistics Regional Map .............................................................................................................. i Regional Activity Summaries Pacific .............................................................................................................. 1 Southwest ........................................................................................................ 5 Great Lakes-Big River .................................................................................... 8 Southeast ......................................................................................................... 12 Northeast ......................................................................................................... 18 Mountain-Prairie ............................................................................................. 24 Alaska .............................................................................................................. 28 California and Nevada...................................................................................... 41 Wildfires Fire Activity Map ............................................................................................. 50 Number / Acres ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]