Fresno County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fresno County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Fresno County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Public Review Draft / April 2018 Fresno County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Public Review Draft / April 2018 Cover Photo Credits: Lake of the Lone Indian, The Armchair Explorer, www.thearmchairexplorer.com/california/sierra-national-forest San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Lands, Limoneira buys 757 acres of orchards in San Joaquin Valley, Staff Report, Thursday, December 3, 2015, https://www.pacbiztimes.com/2015/12/03/limoneira-buys-757- acres-of-orchards-in-san-joaquin-valley/ Clovis Flooding, ABC 30 News, http://abc30.com/news/map-widespread-flooding-reported-on-the-east-side-of-fresno-and-clovis/1699471 Wildfire, Sierra News Online, https://sierranewsonline.com/wildfire-in-fresno-county-prompts-health-caution/ Fresno County Line, Geocaching, https://www.geocaching.com/geocache/GC22X5Q_fresno-monterey-co-line-priest-valley-quadrangle?guid=9bc54552-7fc5-48ac-ad4a-23e5851c90b9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of hazard mitigation is to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from hazards. Fresno County and the other participating jurisdictions developed this multi-hazard mitigation plan to make the County and its residents less vulnerable to future hazard events. This plan was prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 so that Fresno County would be eligible for the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants, including Pre-Disaster Mitigation and Hazard Mitigation Grant programs as well as lower flood insurance premiums (in jurisdictions that participate in the National Flood Insurance Program’s Community Rating System). The plan was originally developed in 2007-2008 and FEMA approved in 2009. The plan was comprehensively updated in 2017-2018. The County followed a planning process in alignment with FEMA guidance during its original development and update, which began with the formation of a hazard mitigation planning committee (HMPC) comprised of key county, city, and district representatives and other stakeholders. The HMPC conducted a risk assessment that identified and profiled hazards that pose a risk to Fresno County, assessed the County’s vulnerability to these hazards, and examined the capabilities in place to mitigate them. The County is vulnerable to several hazards that are identified, profiled, and analyzed in this plan. Floods, wildfires, severe weather, drought, and agricultural hazards are among the hazards that can have a significant impact on the County. Based on the risk assessment, the HMPC identified goals and objectives for reducing the County’s vulnerability to hazards. To meet identified goals and objectives, the plan recommends a number of mitigation actions that include actions specific to each participating jurisdiction. This plan has been formally adopted by the County and the participating jurisdictions and will be updated every five years at a minimum. Fresno County DRAFT i Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapters 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1.1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................ 1.1 1.2 Background and Scope ....................................................................................................................................... 1.1 1.3 Plan Organization ............................................................................................................................................... 1.3 1.3.1 Jurisdictional Annexes ................................................................................................................................ 1.3 2 Community Profile ...................................................................................................... 2.1 2.1 History ................................................................................................................................................................. 2.1 2.2 Geography and Climate ..................................................................................................................................... 2.2 2.3 Economy .............................................................................................................................................................. 2.2 2.4 Population ........................................................................................................................................................... 2.6 2.5 Development Trends ........................................................................................................................................... 2.7 3 Planning Process .......................................................................................................... 3.1 3.1 Background on Mitigation Planning in Fresno County .................................................................................. 3.1 3.2 What’s New in the Plan Update......................................................................................................................... 3.1 3.3 Local Government Participation ....................................................................................................................... 3.4 3.4 The 10-Step Planning Process ............................................................................................................................ 3.6 3.4.1 Phase 1: Organize Resources ...................................................................................................................... 3.7 3.4.2 Phase 2: Assess Risks ............................................................................................................................... 3.17 3.4.3 Phase 3: Develop the Mitigation Plan ...................................................................................................... 3.18 3.4.4 Phase 4: Implement the Plan and Monitor Progress ................................................................................. 3.19 4 Risk Assessment ........................................................................................................... 4.1 4.1 Hazard Identification: Natural Hazards .......................................................................................................... 4.2 4.1.1 Methodology and Results ........................................................................................................................... 4.2 4.1.2 Disaster Declaration History ...................................................................................................................... 4.5 4.2 Hazard Profiles ................................................................................................................................................... 4.8 4.2.1 Agricultural Hazards ................................................................................................................................ 4.10 4.2.2 Avalanche ................................................................................................................................................. 4.15 4.2.3 Dam Failure .............................................................................................................................................. 4.16 4.2.4 Drought ..................................................................................................................................................... 4.23 4.2.5 Earthquake ................................................................................................................................................ 4.34 4.2.6 Flood ......................................................................................................................................................... 4.50 4.2.7 Human Health Hazards: Epidemic/Pandemic ........................................................................................... 4.79 4.2.8 Human Health Hazards: West Nile Virus ................................................................................................. 4.81 4.2.9 Landslide .................................................................................................................................................. 4.85 4.2.10 Soil Hazards............................................................................................................................................ 4.89 4.2.11 Soil Hazards: Expansive Soils ................................................................................................................ 4.96 4.2.12 Soil Hazards: Land Subsidence .............................................................................................................. 4.99 4.2.13 Severe Weather: General ...................................................................................................................... 4.103 4.2.14 Severe Weather: Extreme Temperatures .............................................................................................. 4.106 4.2.15 Severe Weather: Fog ............................................................................................................................ 4.114 4.2.16 Severe Weather: Heavy Rain/Thunderstorm/Hail/Lightning/Wind...................................................... 4.118 4.2.17 Severe Weather: Winter Storm ............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Parks, However, Went Unnoticed
    • D -1:>K 1.2!;EQUOJA-KING$ Ci\NYON NATIONAL PARKS History of the Parks "''' Evaluation of Historic Resources Detennination of Effect, DCP Prepared by • A. Berle Clemensen DENVER SERVICE CENTER HISTORIC PRESERVATION TEA.'! NATIONAL PAP.K SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPAR'J'}fENT OF THE l~TERIOR DENVER, COLOR..\DO SEPTEffilER 1975 i i• Pl.EA5!: RETUl1" TO: B&WScans TEallillCAL INFORMAl!tll CfNIEil 0 ·l'i «coo,;- OOIVER Sf:RV!Gf Cf!fT£R llAT!ONAL PARK S.:.'Ma j , • BRIEF HISTORY OF SEQUOIA Spanish and Mexican Period The first white men, the Spanish, entered the San Joaquin Valley in 1772. They, however, only observed the Sierra Nevada mountains. None entered the high terrain where the giant Sequoia exist. Only one explorer came close to the Sierra Nevadas. In 1806 Ensign Gabriel Moraga, venturing into the foothills, crossed and named the Rio de la Santos Reyes (River of the Holy Kings) or Kings River. Americans in the San Joaquin Valley The first band of Americans entered the Valley in 1827 when Jedediah Smith and a group of fur traders traversed it from south to north. This journey ushered in the first American frontier as fifteen years of fur trapping followed. Still, none of these men reported sighting the giant trees. It was not until 1833 that members of the Joseph R. 1lalker expedition crossed the Sierra Nevadas and received credit as the first whites to See the Sequoia trees. These trees are presumed to form part of either the present M"rced or Tuolwnregroves. Others did not learn of their find since Walker's group failed to report their discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Participación Cívica Y Política De Los Inmigrantes Latinos En Fresno Y Madera, California
    PARTICIPACIÓN CÍVICA Y POLÍTICA DE LOS INMIGRANTES LATINOS en Fresno y Madera, California por MYRNA MARTÍNEZ NATERAS y EDUARDO STANLEY PREFACIO 1 ÍNDICE INTRODUCCIÓN 2 EL CONTEXTO: 7 El Caso de los Inmigrantes que Residen en Fresno MESA REDONDA: 13 Historia, identidad y participación cívica de los latinos de Fresno MESA REDONDA: 25 “Cambios Generacionales” ENTREVISTAS: 35 Los Inmigrantes Ahora “A PARTIR DE AQUÍ” 47 APÉNDICE I 48 Hitos Históricos APÉNDICE II 51 Mesa Redonda: Participantes del Proyecto APÉNDICE III 53 Sobre los Autores 1 PREFACIO par T icipaci ÓN C ÍV ICA Y P O L ÍT ICA Este informe es parte de una serie sobre cívicos y políticos en ciudades alrededor de latinos en Fresno de los inmigrantes Participación Cívica y Política de los los Estados Unidos. Esta colección explora las Inmigrantes Latinoamericanos que estudia tendencias recientes sobre integración de inmi- a nueve ciudades alrededor de los Estados grantes latinos tras las mobilizaciones cívicas Unidos: Charlotte, NC; Tucson, AZ; de inmigrantes en el 2006, resaltando tanto Chicago, IL; Fresno, CA; San José, CA; Las las similitudes como las diferencias a través de Vegas, NV; Los Ángeles, CA; Omaha, NE; y diversas ciudades y sectores. Para el reporte de Washington, DC. Fresno, se organizó una mesa redonda que tuvo Esta serie, patrocinada por una beca de la lugar en la sala de reuniones del Ayuntamiento Fundación John D. y Catherine T. MacArthur, de la Ciudad y en la que participaron 36 es parte de una iniciativa del Centro Woodrow personas. Wilson sobre la participación cívica y política Posteriormente, otras 10 personas fueron de los inmigrantes latinoamericanos dirigida entrevistadas para complementar información por Xóchitl Bada de la Universidad de Illinois y análisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Tectonics of the Central and Southern Coast Ranges of California
    OVERVIEW Late Cenozoic tectonics of the central and southern Coast Ranges of California Benjamin M. Page* Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 George A. Thompson† Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2215 Robert G. Coleman Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 ABSTRACT within the Coast Ranges is ascribed in large Taliaferro (e.g., 1943). A prodigious amount of part to the well-established change in plate mo- geologic mapping by T. W. Dibblee, Jr., pre- The central and southern Coast Ranges tions at about 3.5 Ma. sented the areal geology in a form that made gen- of California coincide with the broad Pa- eral interpretations possible. E. H. Bailey, W. P. cific–North American plate boundary. The INTRODUCTION Irwin, D. L. Jones, M. C. Blake, and R. J. ranges formed during the transform regime, McLaughlin of the U.S. Geological Survey and but show little direct mechanical relation to The California Coast Ranges province encom- W. R. Dickinson are among many who have con- strike-slip faulting. After late Miocene defor- passes a system of elongate mountains and inter- tributed enormously to the present understanding mation, two recent generations of range build- vening valleys collectively extending southeast- of the Coast Ranges. Representative references ing occurred: (1) folding and thrusting, begin- ward from the latitude of Cape Mendocino (or by these and many other individuals were cited in ning ca. 3.5 Ma and increasing at 0.4 Ma, and beyond) to the Transverse Ranges. This paper Page (1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Wildland Fire and Preparedness in San Diego County Working with North County Fire Protection District
    Understanding Wildland Fire and Preparedness in San Diego County Working with North County Fire Protection District Understanding the Threat of Wildland Fire The Threat of Wildland Fire in Our Area? – Gavilan Fire (February 10, 2002) – Cedar Fire (October, 2003) – Paradise Fire (October, 2003) – Rice Fire (October 22, 2007) – Cocos, Highway Fire (May 2014) Understanding the Threat of Wildland Fire • What Drives Wildland Fires in Your Area? – California’s Native Plants are among the most Flammable in the World – Topography – Hot, dry Santa Anna Winds – Year-round Fire Season 2012 Wildland Fire Frequency Mapping The Ready, Set, Go! Program (RSG) • RSG Personal Wildland Fire Action Plan – Family and Property Preparation The Goal is to learn how to improve your homes resistance to wildfires and prepare your family to leave EARLY in a safe manner. National Level Response • Creating Communities Adapted to the Fire Threat - Collaborative efforts at the community level - RSG and is a national tool for this effort - Learn more at www.iafc.org/FAC and www.FireAdapted.org Ready : Prepare your home and family • Home: Creating Defensible Space and Hardening the structure • Family: Create a Family Disaster Plan ReadySandiego.org Alert San Diego Wildland Fire Environment SD Counties Damage assessment team 2007 Rice Fire in Fallbrook: The two main reasons homes were lost: 1. Lack of Defensible Space (Homes overgrown with flammable vegetation) 2. Lack of Ignition Resistant Construction (Homes built to burn) Create Defensible Space Protecting your home from wildfire damage requires limiting the amount of fuel that could bring flames and embers dangerously close to your property.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report Forest Service Grant / Agrreement No
    PROGRESS REPORT FOREST SERVICE GRANT / AGRREEMENT NO. 13-DG-11132540-413 Period covered by this report: 04/01/2014—05/31/2015 Issued to: Center of Southwest Culture, Inc. Address: 505 Marquette Avenue, NW, Suite 1610 Project Name: Arboles Comunitarios Contact Person/Principal Investigator Name: Arturo Sandoval Phone Number: 505.247.2729 Fax Number: 505.243-1257 E-Mail Address: [email protected] Web Site Address (if applicable): www.arbolescomunitarios.com Date of Award: 03/27/2013 Grant Modifications: Date of Expiration: 05/31/2015 Funding: Federal Share: $95,000 plus Grantee Share: $300,000 = Total Project: $395,000 Budget Sheet: FS Grant Manager: Nancy Stremple / Address: 1400 Independence Ave SW, Yates building (3 Central) Washington, DC 20250-1151 Phone Number: 202/309-9873 Albuquerque Service Center (ASC) Send a copy to: Albuquerque Service Center Payments – Grants & Agreements 101B Sun Ave NE Albuquerque, NM 87109 EMAIL: [email protected] FAX: 877-687-4894 Project abstract (as defined by initial proposal and contract): Arboles Comunitarios is proposed under Innovation Grant Category 1 as a national Spanish language education program. By utilizing the expertise of the Center of Southwest Culture community and urban forestry partners along with the targeted outreach capacity of Hispanic Communications Network, this project will communicate the connection between the personal benefits of urban forest and quality of life in a manner that resonates specifically with the Hispanic community. Project objectives: • Bilingual website with
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules
    49398 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR time. The information on candidate taxa Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New will be revised and updated continually Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Fish and Wildlife Service by the Regional Offices identified as Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West having lead responsibility for the Virginia. 50 CFR Part 17 particular taxa. The Service anticipates Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Endangered and Threatened Wildlife publishing annually an update of the Drive, Hadley, Massachusetts 01035± and Plants; Review of Plant and candidate notice of review, annual notice of findings on recycled petitions, 9589 (413/253±8615). Animal Taxa That Are Candidates or Region 6. Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Proposed for Listing as Endangered or and annual description of progress on listing actions. Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Threatened, Annual Notice of Findings Utah, and Wyoming. on Recycled Petitions, and Annual ADDRESSES: Interested persons or organizations should submit comments Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Description of Progress on Listing Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486, Actions regarding a particular taxon to the Regional Director of the Region Denver Federal Center, Denver, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, identified as having the lead Colorado 80225±0486 (303/236±7398). Interior. responsibility for that taxon. Comments Region 7. Alaska. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and ACTION: Notice of review. of a more general nature may be Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Road, submitted to the Chief, Division of Anchorage, Alaska 99503±6199 (907/ SUMMARY: In this document, the Fish Endangered Species, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Wildland Fire Season
    Pacific Northwest Fire and Aviation Management 2019 WILDLAND FIRE SEASON A cooperative effort between the Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior 1 The 204 Cow Fire, ignited by lightning in August 2019 on the Malheur National Forest, was managed to reduce fuel build-up and restore forest health in an area dominated by beetle- killed trees that had not seen fire in 30 years. Photo Credit: Michael Haas Cover: The lightning-caused Granite Gulch Fire, which started in July 2019, burned in a remote part of the Eagle Cap Wilderness within the Wallowa- Whitman National Forest and was successfully managed to restore ecosystem resiliency. USFS Photo 2 A Season of Extremes: Opportunities in Oregon and Washington, Challenges in Alaska The 2019 fire season was short and inexpensive compared to past years in Oregon and Washington. Resources were on board and ready for an active fire year. Yet, the level of fire activity and resource commitment remained well below what has been experienced in recent years. Recurrent precipitation kept most of the geographic area at or below average levels of fuels dryness. The fuel moisture retention helped minimize severe wildfire activity and enabled firefighters to quickly contain hundreds of fires during initial attack. In Alaska, the situation was very different. Fire conditions warranted the highest preparedness level for an extended period of time. Resources from Oregon and Washington were sent to assist with a long and challenging season. While Alaska focused on wildfire suppression, Oregon and Washington seized opportunities to promote resilient landscapes through proactive fire management when conditions allowed.
    [Show full text]
  • Panoche Valley
    THE Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society Established 1926 AVOCET The Newsletter of the Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society September-October 2017 Panoche Valley: Saving an Important Bird Area (IBA) by Shani Kleinhaus, Environmental Advocate oncluding almost eight years of advocacy and litiga- tion, SCVAS, Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter, and Defenders of Wildlife have signed a settlement agree- Cment that allows a photovoltaic solar farm to be built on about 1,000 acres of Panoche Valley floor, while at the same time preserving 26,000 acres, including 4,000 acres of valley floor grasslands, as habitat for endangered species. Califor- nia Department of Fish and Wildlife and Con Edison have also signed the agreement. We are proud of this achievement! Monterey Audubon Society first alerted SCVAS to the plans to construct a solar farm in Panoche Valley. In 2009, plans for solar arrays and supportive infrastructure encompassed most of the valley floor, as well as Little Panoche Valley. No mitigation was offered for the inevitable loss of habitat for the many endangered species that call the valley home, so we started mobilizing. In early 2010 we organized a work- shop that formed an alliance of farmers and environmental organizations in opposition to the project. This alliance has never faltered. In the years that followed, our advocacy and permit require- ments by state and federal wildlife agencies resulted in changing project ownership as investors came and went. The project footprint shrunk and mitigation lands were added. San Benito County produced additional environmental re- view documents, asserting repeatedly that the construction of a solar project on thousands of acres of valley floor could Ferruginous Hawk by Debra Shearwater cont’d on page 4 Wednesday, September 20, 2017 Cuba - The Isle of Endemics: Birds and Bats! with Dave Johnston Wednesday, October 18, 2017 Understanding California's Whales with Ted Cheeseman The Avocet 1 Please carpool if possible; bring binoculars, field guides, layered September-October Field Trips clothing.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Century Modernism Historic Context
    mid-century Modernism Historic Context September 2008 Prepared for the City of Fresno Planning & Development Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 Prepared by Planning Resource Associates, Inc. 1416 N. Broadway Fresno, CA 93721 City of Fresno mid-century Modernism Historic Context mid-century Modernism, Fresno Historical Context Prepared For City of Fresno, Planning and Development Department Prepared By Planning Resource Associates, Inc. 1416 N. Broadway Fresno CA, 93721 Project Team Planning Resource Associates, Inc. 1416 Broadway Street Fresno, CA 93721 Lauren MacDonald, Architectural Historian Lauren MacDonald meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications in Architectural History and History Acknowledgements Research efforts were aided by contributions of the following individuals and organizations: City of Fresno Planning and Development Department Karana Hattersley-Drayton, Historic Preservation Project Manager Fresno County Public Library, California History and Genealogy Room William Secrest, Librarian Fresno Historical Society Maria Ortiz, Archivist / Librarian Jill Moffat, Executive Director John Edward Powell Eldon Daitweiler, Fresno Modern American Institute of Architects, San Joaquin Chapter William Stevens, AIA Les Traeger, AIA Bob Dyer, AIA Robin Gay McCline, AIA Jim Oakes, AIA Martin Temple, AIA Edwin S. Darden, FAIA William Patnaude, AIA Hal Tokmakian Steve Weil 1 City of Fresno mid-century Modernism Historic Context TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………….3
    [Show full text]
  • Fresno Airport Control Tower/ Terminal Radar Approach Control
    Fresno Airport Control Tower/ Terminal Radar Approach Control TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Content 2 Welcome Letter 3 Fresno Tower/TRACON Today 4 Fresno Tower/TRACON Leadership Team 6 Our Expectations of All Employees 10 Policies 11 Local Area Information 13 Sporting and Special Events 14 Restaurants of Note 16 Online Resources 17 Fresno Tower and Airport Area Map 19 Fresno Tower/TRACON Directory 21 2 Welcome Letter Dear New Employee, It is with great pleasure that I welcome you as a new employee to the Federal Aviation Administration and Fresno Tower/TRACON! The enclosed information is designed to serve as an introduction to Fresno Tower, its personnel, and the surrounding community. The entire team at Fresno ATCT is ready to support and assist with your transition into your new job and the Fresno area. Here you will have an opportunity to work with an outstanding team of professionals that help to make Fresno a truly great place to work and develop your skills as an Air Traffic Controller. Your knowledge, abilities, and positive attitude will make you a highly regarded addition to our team, and I am certain that you will make a positive impact on our future. All of us want to make your time at Fresno ATCT as enjoyable and rewarding as possible. Please feel free to ask any questions and express your thoughts and ideas to the staff and senior leadership. Our aim is to create an informal atmosphere and involve everyone in the process of keeping our facility an exceptional place to work. I look forward to working with you and would like to welcome you again to our team.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks
    COMPLIMENTARY $2.95 2017/2018 YOUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO THE PARKS SEQUOIA & KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS ACTIVITIES • SIGHTSEEING • DINING • LODGING TRAILS • HISTORY • MAPS • MORE OFFICIAL PARTNERS This summer, Yamaha launches a new Star motorcycle designed to help you journey further…than you ever thought possible. To see the road ahead, visit YamahaMotorsports.com/Journey-Further Some motorcycles shown with custom parts, accessories, paint and bodywork. Dress properly for your ride with a helmet, eye protection, long sleeves, long pants, gloves and boots. Yamaha and the Motorcycle Safety Foundation encourage you to ride safely and respect the environment. For further information regarding the MSF course, please call 1-800-446-9227. Do not drink and ride. It is illegal and dangerous. ©2017 Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. All rights reserved. BLEED AREA PARK REGULATIONS AND SAFETY TRIM SIZE WELCOME LIVE AREA Welcome to Sequoia and Kings Canyon you’ll find myriad fun activities in the parks! National Parks. The National Park Service (NPS), Dela- Zion National Park Located in central California, the parks ware North at Sequoia and Kings Canyon is the result of erosion, extend from the San Joaquin Valley foothills National Parks and Sequoia Parks Conser- to the eastern crest of the Sierra Nevada. vancy work together to ensure that your sedimentary uplift, and If trees could be kings, their royal realms visit is memorable. Stephanie Shinmachi. would be in these two adjoining parks. This American Park Network guide to 8 ⅞ Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks is testify to nature’s size, beauty and diversity: provided to help plan your visit.
    [Show full text]
  • FOG-82: a Cooperative Field Study and James E
    Michael B. Meyer, G. Garland Lala, FOG-82: A Cooperative Field Study and James E. Jiusto1 Atmospheric Sciences Research Center of Radiation Fog State University of New York at Albany Albany, NY 12222 Abstract The Cloud Physics Section of the Atmospheric Sciences Research Center-State University of New York at Albany conducted a coop- erative field study (FOG-82) during the autumn of 1982 as part of an ongoing radiation-fog research program. A computer-controlled data-acquisition system consisting of sophisticated soil, surface, and boundary-layer sensors, as well as contemporary aerosol and drop- let probes was developed. These data are being used to address a var- iety of critical problems related to radiation-fog evolution. Scientists from 10 universities and research laboratories partici- pated in portions of FOG-82. Research objectives included studies of fog mesoscale meteorology, radiation studies, low-level water budget, vertical fog structure, fog supersaturation, condensation nuclei, and fog-water chemistry, as well as radiation-fog life cycles. A comprehensive description of the FOG-82 program and objectives is presented. FIG . 1. Monthly heavy-fog (visibility, V less than or equal to 1/4 1. Introduction mile) [solid line] and heavy-fog-duration [dashed line] frequency for Albany, New York, 1970-79. The Cloud Physics Section of the Atmospheric Sciences Re- search Center-State University of New York at Albany (ASRC-SUNY) has been involved in fog research for many years, concentrating on the understanding of fog-evolution processes through field measurements and numerical fog modeling. Additional work has been done in fog (synoptic) climatology.
    [Show full text]