DOCSLIB.ORG

Speaker Profiles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Speaker Profiles Speaker Profiles Dr. Peter Bradford Adjunct Professor, Vermont Law School and Former US NRC Commissioner, United States Peter Bradford advises and teaches on utility regulation, nuclear power and energy policy in the United States and abroad. He has been a visiting lecturer at Yale University and has taught at Vermont Law School. He recently served on a National Academy of Sciences panel and is also affiliated with the Regulatory Assistance Project, which provides assistance to state and federal energy regulatory commissions regarding economic regulatory policy and environmental protection. He is vice-chair of the Board of the Union of Concerned Scientists. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Mr. Bradford chaired the New York State Public Service Commission and the Maine Public Utilities Commission and helped to resolve New York’s stalemate over the Shoreham nuclear power plant and Maine’s controversial involvement in Seabrook, both on favorable economic terms. He served on the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission from 1977 until 1982. During his term, the NRC undertook major upgrading of its regulatory and enforcement processes in the wake of the Three Mile Island accident. Mr. Bradford is the author of Fragile Structures: A Story of Oil Refineries, National Security and the Coast of Maine. His articles on utility regulation and nuclear power have appeared in many publications, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Boston Globe, Newsday, and The Electricity Journal. He is a 1964 graduate of Yale University and received his law degree from the Yale Law School in 1968. Vladimír Dlouhý Advisor, Goldman Sachs, Czech Republic Vladimír Dlouhý works for Goldman Sachs as an International Advisor for Central and Eastern Europe. He is currently Chairman of the Advisory Board for Chayton Capital, London, UK, Non-Executive Director of KSK Power Ventur in Hyderabad, India, Chairman of the Advisory Board of Meridiam Infrastructure, Paris, France and an Associate Professor of Macroeconomics and Economic Policy at Charles University in Prague. He is also the author of numerous publications.Mr. Dlouhý studied mathematical economics and econometrics at the School of Economics and at Charles University in Prague, and later received his MBA at Catholic University in Leuven, Belgium. Mr. Dlouhý also served as the Czech Minister of Industry and Trade (1992–1997). Dana Drábová Chief Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Regulator, Czech Republic In her present position, Ms. Drábová is the chief nuclear safety and radiation protection regulator in the Czech Republic. She was appointed as the Chairperson of the State Office for Nuclear Safety (SÚJB) by the Czech government in 1999. Prior to this appointment she worked in the National Radiation Protection Institute (NRPI) in Prague as health physicist, since 1996 was the director of the NRPI. Ms. Drábová is a graduate from the Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering of the Czech Technical University, Department of Dosimetry and Applications of Ionizing Radiation (1980-1985). She has the PhD. in nuclear engineering. Ms. Drábová was the Chair of the Western European Nuclear Regulators Association in 2006 – 2009. She represents the Czech Republic in the European High Level Group on Nuclear Safety and Waste Management (ENSREG). She has participated in several IAEA expert missions in the field of upgrading nuclear safety and radiation protection infrastructure in developing countries (Armenia, Moldova, Uzbekistan, Ukraine, Jordan) and since 2007 has been a member of INSAG appointed by the Director General of the IAEA. Since 2010 she represents Czech Republic in the Board of Governors of the IAEA. Luis Echávarri Director-General, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, France Mr. Luis Echávarri was appointed Director-General of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) in 1997, a position he holds at the present time. Mr. Echávarri represents the OECD/NEA on the Governing Board of the International Energy Agency (IEA) since 1997 and he became a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency's International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group in 2003. Mr. Echávarri began his career as an engineer in Bilbao and in 1975 joined Westinghouse Electric in Madrid. He went on to become Project Manager of the Lemoniz, Sayago and Almaraz nuclear power plants, for Westinghouse, in Spain. In 1985 Mr. Echávarri became Technical Director of the Spanish Nuclear Safety Council (CSN). He was named Commissioner of the CSN in 1987, a position which requires the approval of the Spanish Parliament. In July 1995, Mr. Echávarri became Director-General of the Spanish Nuclear Industry Forum, a post he held until July 1997. Norman L. Eisen United States Ambassador to the Czech Republic, United States Norman L. Eisen was sworn in as U.S. Ambassador to Czech Republic on January 14, 2011 and presented his credentials to the Czech President Vaclav Klaus on January 28, 2011. From January 2009 to January 2011, he served in the White House as Special Counsel to the President for Ethics and Government Reform. In that capacity, he helped lead the Obama Administration’s historic initiatives on government ethics, lobbying regulation and open government. His portfolio also included financial regulatory reform, campaign finance law, whistleblower protection and other reform issues. Prior to that, he was the Deputy General Counsel to the Obama-Biden Presidential Transition. Ambassador Eisen received his J.D. in 1991 from Harvard Law School and his B.A. from Brown University in 1985, both with honors. Mark Fitzpatrick Director, Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Programme, IISS, United Kingdom Mark Fitzpatrick is Director of the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Programme at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) in London. His program focuses on nuclear and missile challenges posed by Iran, North Korea and other outlier states, and on nuclear security and nuclear disarmament issues. He is the author of The Iranian Nuclear Crisis: Avoiding worst-case outcomes (2008) and the editor of IISS Strategic Dossiers on countries and regions of proliferation concern, most recently on North Korea (July 2011) and Iran (February 2011). He has lectured throughout the world and is a frequent media commentator on proliferation topics. He joined IISS in October 2005 after a 26-year career in the US Department of State, including as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Non-Proliferation (acting). His diplomatic postings also included Vienna, in charge of liaison with the International Atomic Energy Agency, as well as postings in Seoul, Tokyo (twice) and Wellington. Denis Flory Deputy Director General for Nuclear Safety and Security, IAEA, Austria Denis Flory is the Deputy Director General of the Department of Nuclear Safety and Security at the IAEA. He was born in 1953 and graduated from the Ecole Polytechnique in 1975 and the Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées in 1978 in nuclear engineering. He started his career in 1978 with the Atomic Energy and Alternative Energies Commission (CEA), where he was employed as a thermal hydraulics engineer for fast neutron reactors. In 1984, he was appointed to the French Embassy in the USSR for three years, as Scientific Attaché. After spending four years as an engineer in Great Britain at the Joint European Torus, he returned to France to take up the position of Technical Advisor to the High Commissioner for Atomic Energy for three years. From 1994 to 2004, Denis Flory was appointed Deputy, and subsequently Head, of the Department for the Security of Radioactive Materials at the Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN). In 2005, he joined the French Embassy in Russia as Nuclear Advisor, before returning to the IRSN, where he was appointed Director of International Relations in September 2009. While holding this position, he contributed to the development of ETSON, the European Technical Safety Organizations Network, and the setting up of ENSTTI, the European Nuclear Safety Training and Tutoring Institute. Ichiro Fujisaki Japanese Ambassador to the United States, Japan Ichiro Fujisaki became Ambassador of Japan to the United States on June 4, 2008. He has served as the political minister of the Embassy of Japan in Washington, DC, from 1995-99. As a diplomat, he has also served in Jakarta, Paris (OECD), and London. Prior to his current post, he served as Ambassador to the UN and to the WTO in Geneva. While there, he served as the Chairman of the Executive Committee of UNHCR (UN High Commissioner for Refugees). In the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Tokyo, he has held such posts as Deputy Director-General for Asian Affairs and Director-General for North American Affairs before being appointed as the Deputy Foreign Minister. He has also served as the Sherpa, or the personal representative, of the Prime Minister to G8 Summit meetings. Fujisaki was a research associate at IISS (International Institute for Strategic Studies) in London from 1987-88. He taught as a lecturer of International Relations at Sophia University in Tokyo from 1991-95. Since his arrival, he has spoken at Harvard, Columbia, Georgetown, SAIS, Stanford, Yale, and Brigham Young University as well as at several think-tanks in Washington, DC, such as the Brookings Institution, AEI, Carnegie Endowment, CSIS, and Stimson Center. He also studied one year each at Brown University and Stanford University Graduate School in the early 1970’s. Elliot Gerson Executive Vice President for Policy and Public Programs, International Partners, The Aspen Institute, United States Elliot Gerson is responsible for the Aspen Institute’s Policy Programs, its Public Programs and its relations with its international partners. The Institute’s Policy Programs focus on many of the most important issues in domestic and international affairs, as well as in topics in art, culture and science. The Institute’s Public Programs open the Institute’s doors to a broader audience of influential citizens. Aspen has international partners in France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan and Romania.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Aspen Institute Mission Is Twofold: to Foster Values-Based Leadership, Encouraging Individuals to Reflect on the Ideals
    The Aspen Institute mission is twofold: to foster values-based leadership, encouraging individuals to reflect on the ideals and ideas that define a good society, and to provide a neutral and balanced venue for discussing and acting on critical issues. The Aspen Institute does this primarily in four ways: seminars, young-leader fellowships around the globe, policy programs, and public conferences and events. The Institute is based in Washington, DC; Aspen, Colorado; and on the Wye River on Maryland's Eastern Shore. It also has offices in New York City and an international network of partners. Seminars Leadership Initiative For decades, Aspen Institute seminars have For more than a decade, the Institute has created a respite from the pace of daily life supported programs for accomplished and an opportunity to deliberate on lasting leaders in the US and around the world. ideas and values in the company of one’s Beginning with the creation of the Henry peers. They help leaders deepen their Crown Fellowship Program, these initiatives knowledge, broaden their perspectives, and share a common goal of encouraging a new enhance their capacities to think creatively generation of civically engaged men and and strategically about solutions to the women to move “from success to problems that confront society. The significance” and apply their entrepreneurial seminars challenge civic and business talents to addressing the foremost challenges leaders and others to rethink the meaning of of their organizations, communities, and “the good society” and explore in small countries. Fellows also put their ideas into groups the ideas and values that have shaped action by carrying out a leadership project.
    [Show full text]
  • Two-Generation Playbook Why a Two-Generation Approach?
    TWO-GENERATION PLAYBOOK WHY A TWO-GENERATION APPROACH? Almost HALF of all children in the United States live in low-income families. Return on investment in education for children AND their parents is high. College based on degree increased yield a school and = career in high-quality 7-10% per 2X achievement early year return parent’s & reduced childhood on income Investments investment social costs. education Two-generation approaches put the WHOLE FAMILY on a path to economic security. early childhood social education = capital networks, friends, and neighbors postsecondary & employment ity n pathways u rt o p p o f o y c a health & g e l well-being economic mental, physical, and assets emotional health coverage asset building, and access to care housing and public supports web: ascend.aspeninstitute.org @aspenascendAscend at the /aspenascendAspen Institute WHAT IS A TWO-GENERATION APPROACH? Two-generation approaches provide opportunities for and meet the needs of children and their parents together. They build education, economic assets, social capital, and health and well- being to create a legacy of economic security that passes from one generation to the next. We all want to see families thrive, but fragmented approaches that address the needs of children and their parents separately often leave either the child or parent behind and dim the family’s chance at success. Placing parents and children in silos ignores the daily challenges faced by parents who are working or studying while raising a child, a challenge even more pronounced for those with low wages. Research has documented the impact of a parent’s education, economic stability, and overall health on a child’s trajectory.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies Collection Mss.00020
    Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies collection Mss.00020 This finding aid was produced using the Archivists' Toolkit February 10, 2015 History Colorado. Stephen H. Hart Research Center 1200 Broadway Denver, Colorado, 80203 303-866-2305 [email protected] Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies collection Table of Contents Summary Information ................................................................................................................................. 3 Historical note................................................................................................................................................4 Scope and Contents note............................................................................................................................... 6 Administrative Information .........................................................................................................................6 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Controlled Access Headings..........................................................................................................................7 Accession numbers........................................................................................................................................ 9 Collection Inventory.................................................................................................................................... 10
    [Show full text]
  • Hotel & Travel Information
    Hotel & Travel Information HOTELS The Aspen Institute has secured and negotiated preferred rates at select Aspen hotels for Aspen Children’s Forum guests. Hotels, rates and information on securing reservations follows. July is peak season in Aspen, therefore guests are strongly encouraged to book hotel rooms as soon as possible. Availability at each hotel is on a first-come, first-served basis. Negotiated rates are for the nights of Wednesday, July 12, and Thursday, July 13, 2017. Please discuss rates for pre- and post-event night lodging directly with hotels for extended stays. Hotel Jerome Website: https://hoteljerome.aubergeresorts.com/ Address: 330 E Main St., Aspen, CO 81611 Negotiated Rate: $475 per night, plus fees and taxes Make a Reservation: Please call Veronica at 970-429-7696 to make a reservation. Reference the “Aspen Children’s Forum.” ASPEN CHILDREN’S FORUM — HOTEL & TRAVEL INFORMATION Aspen Meadows Resort Website: https://www.aspenmeadows.com/ Address: 845 Meadows Rd., Aspen, CO 81611 Negotiated Rate: $285 per night, plus fees and taxes Make a Reservation: Please visit this link to make a reservation within our room block: https://aws.passkey.com/go/ChildrensForum2017 The Limelight Hotel Website: https://www.limelighthotels.com/aspen Address: 355 S Monarch St., Aspen, CO 81611 Negotiated Rate: The room block is FULL, so the negotiated rate is no longer available. However, rooms are still available at a higher rate. Please call the Limelight directly to request the current rate. Make a Reservation: Please email [email protected] or call 800-433-0832. The Gant Condominium Resort Website: http://www.gantaspen.com/ Address: 610 S W End St., Aspen, CO 81611 Negotiated Rates: One Bedroom Condo/One Bath $295 Two Bedroom Condo /Two Bath $395 One Bedroom Condo/One Bath Premier $355 Two Bedroom Condo /Two Bath Premier $395 Three Bedroom Condo /Three Bath Premier $645 Make a Reservation: Please call The Resort Reservations Department at 1-800-345-1471 and reference the “Aspen Institute Children’s Forum” to book a room.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aspen Institute Germany ANNUAL REPORT 2007 2008 the Aspen Institute 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2007 2008 the Aspen Institute ANNUAL REPORT 2007 3 2008
    The Aspen Institute Germany ANNUAL REPORT 2007 2008 The Aspen Institute 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2007 2008 The Aspen Institute ANNUAL REPORT 2007 3 2008 Dear Friend of the Aspen Institute In the following pages you will find a report on the Aspen Institute Germany’s activities for the years 2007 and 2008. As you may know, the Aspen Institute Germany is a non-partisan, privately supported organization dedicated to values-based leadership in addressing the toughest policy challenges of the day. As you will see from the reports on the Aspen European Strategy Forum, Iran, Syria, Lebanon and the Balkans that follow, a significant part of Aspen’s current work is devoted to promoting dialogue between key stakeholders on the most important strategic issues and to building lasting ties and constructive exchanges between leaders in North America, Europe and the Near East. The reports on the various events that Aspen convened in 2007 and 2008 show how Aspen achieves this: by bringing together interdisciplinary groups of decision makers and experts from business, academia, politics and the arts that might otherwise not meet. These groups are convened in small-scale conferences, seminars and discussion groups to consider complex issues in depth, in the spirit of neutrality and open mindedness needed for a genuine search for common ground and viable solutions. The Aspen Institute organizes a program on leadership development. In the course of 2007 and 2008, this program brought leaders from Germany, Lebanon, the Balkans and the United States of America together to explore the importance of values-based leadership together with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aspen Institute Names Top 150 U.S. Community Colleges Eligible for 2021 Aspen Prize CONTACT: Linda Perlstein, 202-339-7490 (
    The Aspen Institute Names Top 150 U.S. Community Colleges Eligible for 2021 Aspen Prize $1 Million Prize Recognizes Excellence in Equitable Outcomes for Students in and After College CONTACT: Linda Perlstein, 202-339-7490 ([email protected]) WASHINGTON, D.C., November 5, 2019 — The Aspen Institute College Excellence Program today named the nation's top 150 community colleges eligible to compete for the $1 million Aspen Prize for Community College Excellence, the nation's signature recognition of high achievement and performance among America's community colleges. Based on strong and improving student outcomes—including in learning, completion rates, employment rates and earnings, and equity—15 percent of community colleges nationwide have been invited to apply for the Aspen Prize. Data show that over the last two years, student retention, graduation rates, and degree completion have improved at the top tier of 150 Aspen Prize-eligible colleges. “Community colleges play a vital role in developing talent and enabling social mobility across the country, and it’s critical for them to get better at what they do,” said Josh Wyner, executive director of the Aspen Institute College Excellence Program. “We’re pleased to see evidence that these institutions are improving, that more are delivering on their promise. We’re also pleased to play a role in honoring outstanding community colleges and sharing what works to ensure great outcomes for students—through graduation and beyond.” The 150 community colleges named today as eligible to compete for the 2021 Prize were selected from a pool of nearly 1,000 public two-year colleges nationwide using publicly available data on student outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Free the Energy
    UTC’S 40th AnniVersARY Anne LAUVerGeon LABORAtoire lec Innovating A new look Tomorrow’s innovation at innovation all-electric cars conference Page 2 Page 13 Page 18 DECEMBER 2013 ### N° 25 Interactions is available in English on http://interactions.utc.fr 43 64 49 59 63 FROM THE PRESIDENT’S DESK 48 50 Let’s free Mechatronics 42 51 12 Integrating and sharing RENs in the building sector the energy 68 10 67 52 11 in the complex French HE Design and validation tools and methodology Functional, smart materials and Research system 45 with new performance ratings Innovation is one of the properties that derive from a complex Complex system and 70 72 44 systems of system engineering Eco-design 35 system, provided that the intrinsic complexity is not simplified Robotics 30 by amputating several features that are more than necessary to 6 58 Technologies for recycling and value Nuclear power adding to rare materials 53 preserve its basic creativity, viz., 27 production 60 38 • Pluri-cultural, since single-track minds are not conducive to 66 Bio-borne 33 62 71 36 21 systems new ideas and tend to run, • Smart metering Pluri-disciplinary, and even trans-disciplinary, inasmuch as 8 32 Nano-electronics innovation often takes place at the frontiers between scientific specialities and where social science have a major role to play 14 Objects Nano-materials when it comes to better understanding transverse issues with 61 communicating 31 Membrane separation 57 processes 39 high strong societal connotation and challenges, Real-time monitoring 41 • Multiple-partnerships,
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear France Abroad History, Status and Prospects of French Nuclear Activities in Foreign Countries
    Mycle Schneider Consulting Independent Analysis on Energy and Nuclear Policy 45, allée des deux cèdres Tél: 01 69 83 23 79 91210 Draveil (Paris) Fax: 01 69 40 98 75 France e-mail: [email protected] Nuclear France Abroad History, Status and Prospects of French Nuclear Activities in Foreign Countries Mycle Schneider International Consultant on Energy and Nuclear Policy Paris, May 2009 This research was carried out with the support of The Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (www.cigionline.org) V5 About the Author Mycle Schneider works as independent international energy nuclear policy consultant. Between 1983 and April 2003 Mycle Schneider was executive director of the energy information service WISE-Paris. Since 2000 he has been an advisor to the German Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Reactor Safety. Since 2004 he has also been in charge of the Environment and Energy Strategies Lecture of the International Master of Science for Project Management for Environmental and Energy Engineering at the French Ecole des Mines in Nantes, France. In 2007 he was appointed as a member of the International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM), based at Princeton University, USA (www.fissilematerials.org). In 2006-2007 Mycle Schneider was part of a consultants’ consortium that assessed nuclear decommissioning and waste management funding issues on behalf of the European Commission. In 2005 he was appointed as nuclear security specialist to advise the UK Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM). Mycle Schneider has given evidence and held briefings at Parliaments in Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, UK and at the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Trustees
    July 2017 One Dupont Circle, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20036-1133 Pherabe Kolb, Managing Director of Communications and Public Affairs Phone: 202.736.2906, Email: [email protected] Board of Trustees James Schine Crown Chairman of the Board Walter Isaacson President & CEO Madeleine K. Albright Beth Brooke-Marciniak Penny Coulter Chair Global Vice Chair of Philanthropist Albright Stonebridge Public Policy Group Ernst & Young Katie Couric Global Anchor Paul F. Anderson William D. Budinger Yahoo News Retired Senior Vice Founder, Former President Chairman and CEO James S. Crown Booz Allen Hamilton Rodel, Inc. President Henry Crown and Company; Donna Barksdale William (Bill) Bynum Chairman Founder Chief Executive Officer The Aspen Institute Barkdale Reading Institute HOPE Credit Union Andrea Cunningham Mercedes Bass Stephen L. Carter Founder and President Mercedes T. Bass Professor of Law Series C Charitable Corporation Yale University Law School Kenneth L. Davis, M.D. Miguel Bezos CEO and President Vice President and Co- Troy Carter Mount Sinai Health System Founder Founder and CEO Bezos Family Foundation Atom Factory Juan Ramon de la Fuente Chairman Richard Braddock Cesar Conde Aspen Institute Mexico President Executive Vice President Join’em LLC NBCUniversal John Doerr Arjun Gupta Michael Klein Partner Founder Chairman, CEO Kleiner Perkins Caufield Telesoft Partners Sunlight Foundation & Byers Jane Harman David H. Koch Thelma Duggin Director, President, and Executive Vice President Executive Director CEO Koch Industries, Inc. AnBryce Foundation Woodrow Wilson Center Satinder Lambah Arne Duncan Kaya Henderson Chairman Former US Secretary of Former Chancellor Ananta Aspen Centre and Education District of Columbia Former Special Envoy of the Public Schools Prime Minister of India Michael D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decline of Civil Nuclear Power Programs
    The decline of civil nuclear power programs: Why state-owned enterprises hold the key to success in the Post-Fukushima Era. John Lambert A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Studies University of Washington 2021 Committee: Christopher Jones Halvor Undem 2021 Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies ©Copyright 2021 John Lambert ii | Page University of Washington Abstract The decline of civil nuclear power programs: Why state-owned enterprises hold the key to success in Post-Fukushima Era. John Lambert Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Christopher Jones Department of International Studies Civil nuclear power is declining in Canada, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and rapidly expanding in China, France, India, Russia, and South Korea. The disaster at the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear power plant changed the future of nuclear power. For some states that means drastic shifts away from nuclear, and for others it means that the future of nuclear just became more difficult and expensive. This paper seeks to examine the role that state-owned enterprises play in advancing nuclear programs, and the difficulties that states without state-owned enterprises will face in this new future. A state-owned enterprise is a corporation that conducts the business of the state, and is either wholly owned by the government, or controlled by a government ownership of majority shares in a private corporation. (e.g., Amtrak, Freddie Mac, etc.) I posit that the presence of state-owned enterprises, or a government’s controlling interest in a private nuclear energy corporation, enables governments to advance their state’s civil nuclear power programs.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Policy Toward Eurasia and the Role of the U.S. Congress
    U.S. POLICY TOWARD EURASIA AND THE ROLE OF THE U.S. CONGRESS May 27 – June 2, 2019 | Prague, Czech Republic U.S. POLICY TOWARD EURASIA AND THE ROLE OF THE U.S. CONGRESS The Aspen Institute Congressional Program May 27 – June 2, 2019 Prague, Czech Republic TABLE OF CONTENTS Rapporteur’s Summary Matthew Rojansky .............................................................................................................. 3 U.S. Policy Toward Eurasia and the Role of the U.S. Congress Thomas Graham ...............................................................................................................17 Getting America Off the Backfoot in Eurasia Evan A. Feigenbaum .........................................................................................................23 Does BRI Really Exist? Robert Daly ......................................................................................................................29 China’s Rise as a Geo-Economic Influencer in Eurasia Philippe Le Corre ...............................................................................................................39 It’s Time to Rethink Russia’s Foreign Policy Strategy Dimitri Trenin ...................................................................................................................47 Is Russia a U.S. 'Adversary' or Just a 'Competitor'? Developing a Sustainable, Realistic U.S. Policy Towards Russia Nikolas K. Gvosdev ............................................................................................................59 The
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    IDEAS LEADERSHIP ACTION OUR MISSION 2 Letter from Dan Porterfield, President and CEO WHAT WE DO 6 Policy Programs 16 Leadership Initiatives 20 Public Programs 26 Youth & Engagement Programs 30 Seminars 34 International Partnerships 38 Media Resources THE YEAR IN REVIEW 40 2017-2018 Selected Highlights of the Institute's Work 42 Live on the Aspen Stage INSTITUTIONAL ADVANCEMENT 46 Capital Campaigns 48 The Paepcke Society 48 The Heritage Society 50 Society of Fellows 51 Wye Fellows 52 Justice Circle and Arts Circle 55 Philanthropic Partners 56 Supporters STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 90 2017 Annual Report WHO WE ARE 96 Our Locations 98 Aspen Institute Leadership 104 Board of Trustees LETTER FROM DAN PORTERFIELD, PRESIDENT AND CEO A LETTER FROM PRESIDENT AND CEO DAN PORTERFIELD There is nothing quite like the Aspen Institute. It is In the years to come, the Aspen Institute will deepen an extraordinary—and unique—American institution. our impacts. It is crucial that we enhance the devel- We work between fields and across divides as a opment of the young, address the urgent challenges non-profit force for good whose mission is to con- of the future, and renew the ideals of democratic so- vene change-makers of every type, established and ciety. I look forward to working closely with our many emerging, to frame and then solve society’s most partners and friends as we write the next chapter on important problems. We lead on almost every issue the Institute’s scope and leadership for America and with a tool kit stocked for solution-building—always the world.
    [Show full text]