DOCSLIB.ORG

Rail Transportation Safety Investigation Report R17v0220

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rail Transportation Safety Investigation Report R17v0220 RAIL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT R17V0220 MAIN-TRACK TRAIN COLLISION WITH TRACK EQUIPMENT Canadian Pacific Railway Freight train 868-078 Mile 68.4, Mountain Subdivision Fraine, British Columbia 31 October 2017 ABOUT THIS INVESTIGATION REPORT The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. This report is the result of an investigation into a class 3 occurrence. For more information, see the Occurrence Classification Policy at www.tsb.gc.ca. TERMS OF USE Non-commercial reproduction Unless otherwise specified, you may reproduce this investigation report in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes, and in any format, without charge or further permission, provided you do the following: • Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced. • Indicate the complete title of the materials reproduced and name the Transportation Safety Board of Canada as the author. • Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of the version available at [URL where original document is available]. Commercial reproduction Unless otherwise specified, you may not reproduce this investigation report, in whole or in part, for the purposes of commercial redistribution without prior written permission from the TSB. Materials under the copyright of another party Some of the content in this investigation report (notably images on which a source other than the TSB is named) is subject to the copyright of another party and is protected under the Copyright Act and international agreements. For information concerning copyright ownership and restrictions, please contact the TSB. Citation Transportation Safety Board of Canada, Rail Transportation Safety Investigation Report R17V0220 (released 29 March 2019). Transportation Safety Board of Canada Place du Centre 200 Promenade du Portage, 4th floor Gatineau QC K1A 1K8 819-994-3741 1-800-387-3557 www.tsb.gc.ca [email protected] © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Transportation Safety Board of Canada, 2019 Rail transportation safety investigation report R17V0220 Cat. No. TU3-11/17-0220E-PDF ISBN: 978-0-660-30194-5 This report is available on the website of the Transportation Safety Board of Canada at www.tsb.gc.ca Le présent rapport est également disponible en français. RAIL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT R17V0220 | III Table of contents 1.0 Factual information ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The accident ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Mountain Subdivision ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Canadian Rail Operating Rules Rule 42 (Planned Protection) .................................................. 5 1.4 Track worker and rail traffic controller information ...................................................................... 6 1.4.1 Rule 42 foreman ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Supervisor ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.4.3 Backhoe operator ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.4.4 Rail traffic controller .................................................................................................................. 7 1.5 Actions of the backhoe operator ......................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Summary of events .................................................................................................................................... 8 1.7 Certification of third-party contractors............................................................................................10 1.8 Safety requirements for Canadian Pacific Railway employees working near the track 11 1.9 Minimum safety requirements for Canadian Pacific Railway contractors..........................13 1.10 Adaptations to rules or standard operating procedures ..........................................................15 1.11 Situational awareness .............................................................................................................................16 1.12 Efficiency testing .......................................................................................................................................17 1.13 Previous TSB rail safety advisory on Rule 42 (Planned Protection) ......................................17 1.14 Other TSB investigations involving deficiencies in track worker protection and/or protection for contractors working on the track .........................................................................18 2.0 Analysis ................................................................................................................... 19 2.1 The accident ...............................................................................................................................................19 2.2 Canadian Pacific Railway Rule 42 protection of third-party contractors............................20 2.2.1 Safety briefings .........................................................................................................................20 2.2.2 Reliance on working memory .............................................................................................20 2.3 Situational awareness .............................................................................................................................21 2.4 Adaptations to rules or standard operating procedures ..........................................................21 3.0 Findings ................................................................................................................... 22 3.1 Findings as to causes and contributing factors ............................................................................22 3.2 Findings as to risk .....................................................................................................................................22 3.3 Other findings ............................................................................................................................................22 4.0 Safety action ........................................................................................................... 23 4.1 Safety action taken ..................................................................................................................................23 4.1.1 Transportation Safety Board of Canada ..........................................................................23 4.1.2 Transport Canada .....................................................................................................................23 4.1.3 Canadian Pacific Railway .......................................................................................................23 Appendices....................................................................................................................... 24 Appendix A – Canadian Rail Operating Rules Rule 42 (Planned Protection) and Rule 842 ....24 IV | TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD OF CANADA Appendix B – Canadian National Railway Company training requirements for contractors ..26 Appendix C – On-track safety job briefing form provided to the employees ..............................27 Appendix D – Job briefing form as completed by the supervisor .....................................................28 Appendix E – Other TSB investigations involving deficiencies in track worker protection and/or protection for contractors working on the track ..........................................................30 RAIL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT R17V0220 | 1 RAIL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT R17V0220 MAIN-TRACK TRAIN COLLISION WITH TRACK EQUIPMENT Canadian Pacific Railway Freight train 868-078 Mile 68.4, Mountain Subdivision Fraine, British Columbia 31 October 2017 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Summary On 31 October 2017, at about 0600 Pacific Daylight Time, Canadian Pacific Railway freight train 868-078 was proceeding eastward on the Mountain Subdivision at 15 mph when it collided with a backhoe equipped with a hi-rail cart just west of Mile 68.4 near Fraine, British Columbia (BC). The backhoe operator was transported to hospital with serious injuries. The backhoe sustained damage to the boom and windshield. The train crew members were not injured. The lead locomotive sustained minor damage. 1.0 FACTUAL INFORMATION 1.1 The accident On 31 October 2017 at 0352,1 Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) freight train 868-078 departed eastward from Revelstoke, BC, en route to Golden, BC (Figure 1). The train consisted of 2 head-end locomotives, 1 mid-train remote locomotive, 1 tail-end remote locomotive, and 152 empty cars. It weighed 3290 tons and was 8363
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations
    Phase 1 Interim Report Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations City of Toronto Prepared for the City of Toronto by IBI Group and Stantec August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Document Control Page CLIENT: City of Toronto City-Wide Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail PROJECT NAME: Operations Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations REPORT TITLE: Phase 1 Interim Report - DRAFT IBI REFERENCE: 105734 VERSION: V2 - Issued August 30, 2017 J:\105734_RailProximit\10.0 Reports\Phase 1 - Data DIGITAL MASTER: Collection\Task 3 - Interim Report for Phase 1\TTR_CityWideLandUse_Phase1InterimReport_2017-08-30.docx ORIGINATOR: Patrick Garel REVIEWER: Margaret Parkhill, Steve Donald AUTHORIZATION: Lee Sims CIRCULATION LIST: HISTORY: Accessibility This document, as of the date of issuance, is provided in a format compatible with the requirements of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), 2005. August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020
    New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020 New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020 Contents Introduction 1 The Case for Change 4 Investment Option 12 Strategic Case 18 Economic Case 31 Financial Case 37 Deliverability and Operations Case 41 Business Case Summary 45 iv Executive Summary Introduction The Town of Milton in association with a landowner’s group (the Proponent) approached Metrolinx to assess the opportunity to develop a new GO rail station on the south side of the Milton Corridor, west of Trafalgar Road. This market-driven initiative assumes the proposed station would be planned and paid for by the private sector. Once built, the station would be transferred to Metrolinx who would own and operate it. The proposed station location is on undeveloped land, at the heart of both the Trafalgar Corridor and Agerton Employment Secondary Plan Areas studied by the Town of Milton in 2017. As such, the project offers the Town of Milton the opportunity to realize an attractive and vibrant transit-oriented community that has the potential to benefit the entire region. Option for Analysis This Initial Business Case (IBC) assesses a single option for the proposed station. The opening-day concept plan includes one new side platform to the north of the corridor, with protection for a future second platform to the south. The site includes 1,000 parking spots, a passenger pick-up/drop-off area (40 wait spaces, 10 load spaces), bicycle parking (128 covered spaces, 64 secured spaces) and a bus loop including 11 sawtooth bus bays.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Portraits Book
    HH Beechwood is proud to be The National Cemetery of Canada and a National Historic Site Life Celebrations ♦ Memorial Services ♦ Funerals ♦ Catered Receptions ♦ Cremations ♦ Urn & Casket Burials ♦ Monuments Beechwood operates on a not-for-profit basis and is not publicly funded. It is unique within the Ottawa community. In choosing Beechwood, many people take comfort in knowing that all funds are used for the maintenance, en- hancement and preservation of this National Historic Site. www.beechwoodottawa.ca 2017- v6 Published by Beechwood, Funeral, Cemetery & Cremation Services Ottawa, ON For all information requests please contact Beechwood, Funeral, Cemetery and Cremation Services 280 Beechwood Avenue, Ottawa ON K1L8A6 24 HOUR ASSISTANCE 613-741-9530 • Toll Free 866-990-9530 • FAX 613-741-8584 [email protected] The contents of this book may be used with the written permission of Beechwood, Funeral, Cemetery & Cremation Services www.beechwoodottawa.ca Owned by The Beechwood Cemetery Foundation and operated by The Beechwood Cemetery Company eechwood, established in 1873, is recognized as one of the most beautiful and historic cemeteries in Canada. It is the final resting place for over 75,000 Canadians from all walks of life, including im- portant politicians such as Governor General Ramon Hnatyshyn and Prime Minister Sir Robert Bor- den, Canadian Forces Veterans, War Dead, RCMP members and everyday Canadian heroes: our families and our loved ones. In late 1980s, Beechwood began producing a small booklet containing brief profiles for several dozen of the more significant and well-known individuals buried here. Since then, the cemetery has grown in national significance and importance, first by becoming the home of the National Military Cemetery of the Canadian Forces in 2001, being recognized as a National Historic Site in 2002 and finally by becoming the home of the RCMP National Memorial Cemetery in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Belleville Subdivision
    BELLEVILLE SUBDIVISION COUNTIES: LANARK, FRONTENAC,LENNOX& ADDINGTON, HASTINGS, NORTHUMBERLAND, DURHAM AND METRO CP MILEAGE COUNTY MUNICIPALITY FROM TO Lanark Smiths Falls Town 0.00 0.60 Lanark Montague Twp 0.60 1.44 Lanark Drummond/North Elmsley Twp (North Elmsley Twp) 1.44 10.20 Lanark Drummond/North Elmsley Twp (Drummond Twp) 10.20 11.20 Lanark Perth Town 11.20 12.91 Lanark Bathrust Burgess Sherbrooke Twp (Bathurst Twp) 12.91 23.08 Lanark Bathrust Burgess Sherbrooke Twp (South Sherbrooke T 23.08 31.00 Frontenac Central Frontenac Twp 31.00 36.58 Frontenac South Frontenac Twp 36.58 40.19 Frontenac Central Frontenac Twp 40.19 53.97 Lennox & Addington Stone Mills Twp 53.97 54.73 Lennox & Addington Stone Mills Twp 54.73 67.97 Lennox & Addington Greater Napanee Town 67.97 74.01 (Richmond Twp) Hastings Tyendinaga Twp 74.01 85.46 Hastings Belleville City 85.46 94.27 Hastings Quinte West City 94.27 108.84 Northumberland Brighton Mun. 108.84 114.85 Northumberland Cramahe Twp 114.85 121.34 Northumberland Alnwick/Haldimand Twp 121.34 130.5 Northumberland Hamilton Twp 130.5 134.04 Northumberland Cobourg Town 134.04 136.18 Northumberland Hamilton Twp 136.18 140 Northumberland Port Hope & Hope Town 140.00 149.81 Durham Clarington Mun. 149.81 170.71 Durham Oshawa City 170.71 175.87 Durham Whitby Town 175.87 181.47 Durham Ajax Town 181.47 185.97 Durham Pickering Town 185.97 191.97 Metro Toronto City (Scarborough City) 191.97 202.35 Metro Toronto City (North York City) 202.35 205.21 Metro Toronto City (East York Borough) 205.21 207.89 Metro Toronto
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Rail Capacity on a Capacity- Constrained Urban Mixed-Operation Rail Corridor in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area
    HEC MONTRÈAL Determinants of rail capacity on a capacity- constrained urban mixed-operation rail corridor in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area BY Johannes Urbanski 11194656 GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT THESIS DIRECTOR Jacques Roy HEC MONTRÈAL A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ADMINISTRATION February 2019 © Johannes Urbanski, 2019 i Résumé Le but de ce mémoire de maîtrise est d’évaluer les facteurs qui influencent la capacité des corridors ferroviaires en milieu urbain qui font face à une croissance soutenue de la demande en passagers et en transport de marchandises. Également, l’appréciation des valeurs foncières restreint la croissance de la capacité d’une ligne et crée une pression économique pour intensifier l’utilisation des voies existantes plutôt que d’en bâtir de nouvelles. Ainsi, ce mémoire tente d’explorer comment la planification des horaires des trains de passagers influence la capacité générale d’une ligne et la qualité de ces horaires. Ce mémoire fait une étude de cas en modélisant le corridor Toronto-Kitchener et calcule les temps de déplacement et de blocage des voies selon deux genres de systèmes de signalisation. Les horaires de plusieurs catégories de trains de passagers sont planifiés selon cinq stratégies différentes, alors que la capacité est déterminée en ajoutant des trains de marchandises dans les créneaux horaire disponibles. Les résultats suggèrent que la périodicité d’un horaire a un impact positif important sur la capacité d’une ligne, alors que la présence d’une symétrie d’horaire et de correspondances coordonnés semblent avoir un impact légèrement négatif.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Investigation Report R12t0217 Pedestrian
    RAILWAY INVESTIGATION REPORT R12T0217 PEDESTRIAN FATALITY CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY FREIGHT TRAIN 147-01 MILE 111.12, GALT SUBDIVISION LONDON, ONTARIO 01 DECEMBER 2012 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Railway Investigation Report Pedestrian Fatality Canadian Pacific Railway Freight Train 147-01 Mile 111.12, Galt Subdivision London, Ontario 01 December 2012 Report Number R12T0217 Summary On 01 December 2012, at 1636 Eastern Standard Time, while proceeding westward on the Galt Subdivision, Canadian Pacific Railway freight train 147-01 struck an 11-year-old pedestrian on the Third Street public crossing (Mile 111.12) in London, Ontario. This crossing is equipped with flashing lights, a bell, and gates. The pedestrian sustained fatal injuries. Ce rapport est également disponible en français. - 3 - Factual Information On 01 December 2012, Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) freight train 147-01 (the train) was proceeding westward on the Galt Subdivision, en route from Toronto, Ontario, to London, Ontario (Figure 1). The train consisted of 2 head-end locomotives and 68 loaded intermodal flat cars. The train weighed 4894 tons and was 6573 feet long. The crew comprised a locomotive engineer and a conductor, who were both qualified for their respective positions and met established rest and fitness requirements. Figure 1. Intended route of CP freight train 147-01 (Toronto, Ontario, to London, Ontario) (Source: Railway Association of Canada, Canadian Railway Atlas) The Accident At 1634, 1 while proceeding westward at 35 mph, the train approached the Third Street public crossing (the crossing), located at Mile 111.12 of the Galt Subdivision in London, Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Feasibility Study for Proposed Rerouting of the Greater Toronto Rail Network
    Clause 3 in Report No. 1 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on January 21, 2016. 3 Feasibility Study for Proposed Rerouting of the Greater Toronto Rail Network Committee of the Whole recommends: 1. Receipt of the presentation by Stephen Collins, Director, Infrastructure Management and Project Management Office. 2. Adoption of the following recommendations, as amended, in the report dated December 19, 2015 from Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. Council formally request Metrolinx to undertake consultation with York Region, the Cities of Markham and Vaughan and the Town of Richmond Hill before proceeding with additional detailed studies relating to the rerouting of a freight rail proposal. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate a copy of this report to the Clerks of the Cities of Cambridge, Markham, Mississauga, Toronto, Vaughan, the Towns of Richmond Hill and Milton and Metrolinx. 1. Recommendation It is recommended that: 1. Council formally request Metrolinx to undertake consultation with York Region and the Cities of Markham and Vaughan before proceeding with additional detailed studies relating to the rerouting of a freight rail proposal. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate a copy of this report to the Clerks of the Cities of Cambridge, Markham, Mississauga, Toronto, Vaughan, Town of Milton and Metrolinx. Committee of the Whole 1 Transportation Services January 14, 2016 Feasibility Study for Proposed Rerouting of the Greater Toronto Rail Network 2. Purpose This report informs Council on the findings of a feasibility study commissioned by Cities of Cambridge, Mississauga, Toronto and Town of Milton to look at rerouting freight rail traffic to separate it from passenger rail services on the GO Transit Milton and Kitchener lines.
    [Show full text]
  • West Toronto Diamond
    West Toronto Diamond Brent Archibald, P.Eng. Vic Anderson, MSc (London), DIC, P.Eng. Joanne Crabb, P.Eng.,ing., PE Jonathan Werner, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. Paper prepared for presentation at the Bridges: Economic and Social Linkages Session of the 2007 Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Abstract This paper describes the West Toronto Diamond project in Ontario, Canada. This project has been designed to eliminate at-grade diamond crossings of the Canadian National Railway (CN) and the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) tracks in the Junction area of Toronto, an area which takes its name from the confluence of these railways. Since the 1880’s, rail traffic here has been constrained by these diamond crossings involving the CN and CPR mainlines and a CPR Wye track. The project will result in a quantum improvement in the levels of service and safety provided by the Railways at this site. The project involves relocating the CN tracks below the CPR tracks, while at the same time maintaining all rail operations with a minimum of interruption to the Railways’ activities. The site is physically constrained and hence, in order to accomplish this goal, Delcan’s design includes the sliding of 4 mainline railway bridge spans, weighing a total of some 10,000 tonnes, into their final positions. Each slide occupies only a few hours, as it is powered by computerized high-speed tandem hydraulic jacks, moving these massive structures on steel / aluminum bronze slide paths, enabling the bridge spans to move quickly and continuously into position during brief possessions of the tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study and Business Case of Construction The
    RE:EX16.18 Appendix 1 Report Feasibility Study and Business Case of Constructing the Missing Link by IBI Group with Stantec August 19, 2015 IBI GROUP REPORT FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS CASE OF CONSTRUCTING THE MISSING LINK Document Control Page CLIENT: City of Mississauga PROJECT NAME: Feasibility Study of the Missing Link in Toronto's Rail Network REPORT TITLE: Feasibility Study and Business Case of Constructing the Missing Link IBI REFERENCE: TO-38736 VERSION: DIGITAL MASTER: J:\38736_MissingLink\10.0 Reports\TTR_Missing Link Feasibility2015-08-06.docx\2015-08-19\SD ORIGINATOR: Lee Sims REVIEWER: [Name] AUTHORIZATION: [Name] CIRCULATION LIST: HISTORY: August 19, 2015 IBI GROUP REPORT FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS CASE OF CONSTRUCTING THE MISSING LINK Executive Summary Attached is a report on the feasibility of adding the “Missing Link” to the Greater Toronto rail network. The Missing Link is a new rail corridor linking the CN bypass line at Bramalea with the CP through route near the Milton-Mississauga border. The purpose of the Missing Link is to separate major through rail freight flows from passenger services on the GO Transit Milton and Kitchener lines. Just constructing the Missing Link does not fulfil all the requirements for rerouting of through freight flows; this requires upgrading of several other lines and providing new connections between CP and CN. Constructing the Missing Link and the other rail improvements has three major benefits: • It eliminates the impacts of the widening of the Milton and Kitchener GO Transit routes. These will be considerable and will be felt in the centres of Mississauga and Brampton.
    [Show full text]
  • <Original Signed By>
    Canadian National Luanne Patterson Sr System Manager - EA Environment Canadian National Box 8100 Montreal, Quebec Canada H3C 3N4 June 14, 2018 Lesley Griffiths Panel Chair c/o Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 160 Elgin Street Ottawa ON, K1A 0H3 By email Dear Ms. Griffiths: The Canadian National Railway Company (CN) is pleased to provide our response which completes our submission to Information Request Package 4.1 – Milton Logistics Hub Project Review Panel (Doc # 600) received on Oct 11, 2017 as supplemental information for your review and consideration in support of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (CEAA 2012). We trust this additional information will sufficiently clarify the questions posed by the Review Panel in the review of our proposed Milton Logistics Hub project. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, <Original signed by> Luanne Patterson Senior System Manager – Environmental Assessment cc: Dr. Isobel Heathcote, Review Panel Member Mr. William McMurray, Review Panel Member Joseph Ronzio, CEAA Darren Reynolds, CN June 13, 2018 CN Milton Logistics Hub (“Project”) CEAR File No. 80100 CN Response to the Review Panel’s Information Request 4.1 Received October 11, 2017 Contents SOCIO-ECONOMIC ..................................................................................................................1 IR4.6 Summary of Strategic Projections Report (2013) ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Pacific Railway Ingenuity. Southern Ontario Service Area
    Canadian Pacific Railway Ingenuity. Southern Ontario Service Area Time Table 81 Effective at 1200 Sunday July 25, 2004 Eastern Daylight Saving Time “…willingness to obey the rules…” Brock Winter Vice President Transportation/Field Operations Doug McFarlane Assistant Vice President Transportation Guido Deciccio General Manager Operations, Field Operations Time Table No 81 – July 25, 2004 Vision, mission, values and goals are all requirements for a successful company. They are the description of where the Vision, Mission, company is headed, when we will know we are there, and how employees will work together towards reaching our Values, Goals destination. Every company has them, even if they are not always written down, or displayed on a computer screen. Vision Values Drive for Results - positive results for individuals, groups and the company We will be the preferred business In all our relationships we will • We share a sense of urgency and partner in rail-based transportation demonstrate our steadfast passion for excellence in the services. commitment to: achievement of high quality results. • In our decisions we balance the need for short-term results with our Mission Integrity/Trust - honesty, reliability, a requirement for long-term success. positive belief in others • We follow through on commitments Through teamwork, we will create and ensure individual and group • We earn and maintain trust by value by delivering superior accountability. delivering on commitments to all customer-focused transportation • We take pride in our employees, customers, unions, solutions. accomplishments and recognize the communities and investors. success of individuals, groups and the • We further our own interests company. through collaborative behaviors Goals Leadership Through Teamwork - 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Missing Rail Link Update.Pdf
    Report to: Development Services Committee Meeting Date: January 29, 2018 SUBJECT: Re-routing of Rail Freight Traffic - Missing Rail Link Update PREPARED BY: Loy Cheah, Senior Manager, Transportation, x 4838 REVIEWED BY: Brian Lee, Director, Engineering, x 7507 RECOMMENDATION: 1) That the staff report entitled “Re-routing of Rail Freight Traffic - Missing Rail Link Update” dated January 29, 2018 be received; 2) Metrolinx be advised that the City strongly objects to the Missing Rail Link proposal; 3) Metrolinx be requested to consult with York Region, the Cities of Markham and Vaughan and the Town of Richmond Hill as part of their Freight By-Pass environmental assessment study; 4) That the Prime Minister, the Premier, Federal and Provincial Transportation Ministers, Metrolinx, York Region, City of Vaughan and Town of Richmond Hill be so advised; 5) That Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution. PURPOSE: At the December 5, 2017 Development Services Committee meeting, staff was directed to “report back on the “missing link” for further discussions and prepare a motion for Council, reiterating the City of Markham’s position regarding the transport of dangerous goods.” This report addresses this direction from Council and provides an update on recent developments regarding the planning of this rail link. BACKGROUND: A March 2016 staff memorandum informed Council of the “Feasibility Study and Business Case of Constructing the Missing Link”, a study jointly commissioned by the Cities of Cambridge, Mississauga, Toronto and the Town of Milton. Figure 1 shows the current rail network in the Greater Toronto Hamilton area (GTHA).
    [Show full text]