DOCSLIB.ORG

4Th National IPM Symposium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4Th National IPM Symposium contents Foreword . 2 Program Schedule . 4 National Roadmap for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) . 9 Whole Systems Thinking Applied to IPM . 12 Fourth National IPM Symposium . 14 Poster Abstracts . 30 Poster Author Index . 92 1 foreword Welcome to the Fourth National Integrated Pest Management The Second National IPM Symposium followed the theme “IPM Symposium, “Building Alliances for the Future of IPM.” As IPM Programs for the 21st Century: Food Safety and Environmental adoption continues to increase, challenges facing the IPM systems’ Stewardship.” The meeting explored the future of IPM and its role approach to pest management also expand. The IPM community in reducing environmental problems; ensuring a safe, healthy, has responded to new challenges by developing appropriate plentiful food supply; and promoting a sustainable agriculture. The technologies to meet the changing needs of IPM stakeholders. meeting was organized with poster sessions and workshops covering 22 topic areas that provided numerous opportunities for Organization of the Fourth National Integrated Pest Management participants to share ideas across disciplines, agencies, and Symposium was initiated at the annual meeting of the National affiliations. More than 600 people attended the Second National IPM Committee, ESCOP/ECOP Pest Management Strategies IPM Symposium. Based on written and oral comments, the Subcommittee held in Washington, DC, in September 2001. With symposium was a very useful, stimulating, and exciting experi- the 2000 goal for IPM adoption having passed, it was agreed that ence. it was again time for the IPM community, in its broadest sense, to come together to review IPM achievements and to discuss visions The Third National IPM Symposium shared two themes, “Putting for how IPM could meet research, extension, and stakeholder Customers First” and “Assessing IPM Program Impacts.” These needs. A steering committee was self-selected from among the two dominant themes provided the unifying focus for more than meeting attendees to coordinate the initial symposium. Represen- three days of presentations and research contributions. It was tatives from IPM, IR-4, SARE, EP, OPMP, ARS, and the Regional agreed that putting customers first required developing or Pest Management Centers, all present at the meeting, have been strengthening skills involved in building diverse teams for program active participants in the symposium development, and their design and implementation. Furthermore, IPM programs oriented programs are among the symposium cosponsors. Once site toward the twin objectives of enhanced profitability and better selection and other operations such as soliciting meeting sponsor- environmental and public health performance provided the ship commenced, the steering committee was expanded for the potential for win-win strategies for agriculture, society, and both operations phase of planning, which included developing the rural and urban interests. program—the key element of the IPM Symposium. The steering The planning and development of this year’s symposium has been committee is now comprised of a number of individuals repre- a collaborative effort from numerous individuals that represent senting many organizations nationally active in IPM. Their the diverse interests of the IPM community. The Fourth National collaborative efforts have developed a program that expands on IPM Symposium plenary session will address “Building Alliances the theme of Building Alliances by offering a diversity of session for the Future of IPM” by featuring speakers who have been topics. successful in developing collaborative relationships. The keynote The First National IPM Symposium was held on April 25–28, speaker, Harold Coble, will unveil the National Roadmap for 1989, in Las Vegas. A focus for this initial meeting was to bring Integrated Pest Management. This symposium provides an scientists from across disciplines together to discuss common exciting opportunity for you to share in the latest IPM develop- interests and to interact with a broader community of colleagues ments through participation in more than 60 breakout sessions involved in IPM. No less important was the goal of bringing IPM and more than 200 poster presentations. Indeed, the expecta- researchers together with public policy makers, university and tions and thereby the opportunities for IPM are changing, but federal agency administrators, and other decision makers. An they can be realized by alliances of individuals and organizations evaluation of the meeting from the 500 participants indicated an sharing their knowledge, experiences, and a common vision for overwhelming desire for periodic national meetings with a greater IPM. focus on sessions where research and extension colleagues Frank Zalom involved in IPM could meet and share knowledge, experiences, Michael Hoffmann and interdisciplinary successes. Susan Ratcliffe Co-chairs, Fourth National IPM Symposium 2 Supporters National IPM Symposium Sarah Lynch * Topic Coordinators Steering Committee Robert Nowierski ** U.S. Department of A. IPM Recognition and (Organization Phase) Eldon Ortman * Agriculture Incentive Jerry Baron Ed Rajotte, Co-chair ** Cooperative State Tom Green, Curt Petzoldt Wilfred Burr Ann Sorenson Research, Education, and B. Marketing IPM Harold Coble * Plenary/Keynote Speakers Extension Service Bill Hutchison, Mary Jerry DeWitt Subcommittee CSREES/Regional Woodsen Michael Fitzner ** Topics/Sessions Integrated Pest C. New Management Tom Fuchs Subcommittee Management Centers Technologies Peter Goodell CSREES/Regional Local Arrangements Gary Felton, Michael Stout Ames Herbert Integrated Pest Committee Michael Hoffmann D. Evaluation and Impact Management Grants Suzanne Bissonette Rick Melnicoe Assessment Programs Aaron Hager Therese Murtagh Esther Day, Thomas CSREES/IR-4 Program Larry Hanks Robert Nowierski Greitens APHIS Dean Malvick Eldon Ortman E. Building Partnerships; Agricultural Research Nancy Pataky Ed Rajotte Examples and the Service Bruce Paulsrud Susan Ratcliffe Necessary Skills Office of Pest Management Bob Nowierski Ron Stinner Carrie Koplinka-Loehr Policy Susan Ratcliffe, Chair James VanKirk F. Community (Urban) IPM Barbara VanTil U.S. Environmental Protection Frank Zalom, Chair Tim Gibb, Jennifer Grant Agency Elaine Wolff National IPM Symposium G. IPM Education and Site Selection Committee CropLife Inc. Steering Committee Outreach BASF Corporation (Operations Phase) Jerry Baron Lyn Garling Michael Fitzner, Chair Dow AgroSciences Jerry Baron H. Biological Control and Tom Fuchs Pat Cimino Bio-Based IPM Campbell Soup Company Susan Ratcliffe Harold Coble Bob Nowierski Gerber Products Company James VanKirk Jerry DeWitt I. Vertebrate and Wildlife IPM Frank Zalom Del Monte Foods Company Michael Fitzner Michael Hoffman Solicitation Committee Welch’s National Grape Tom Fuchs J. IPM in Perspective Cooperative Tom Green Jerry Baron Kim Crum, Allison Jones Peter Goodell Michael Fitzner Exhibitors K. Strategic Planning and Tom Hall Tom Green Visioning for IPM: The CropLife Inc. Linda Herbst Tom Hall Roadmap and Beyond Dow AgroSciences Michael Hoffmann Scott Hutchins Ed Rajotte MeisterPro Information Allison Jones Eldon Ortman, Chair L. Invasive Species Resources Sarah Lynch Ann Sorenson Janet Clark, Chris Dionigi IPM Tech, Inc. Rick Melnicoe Exhibitors IR-4 Project Robert Nowierski M. Risk Assessment and Jerry Baron, Chair National Alliance of Eldon Ortman Management Tom Green Independent Crop Ed Rajotte Tom Green Consultants Susan Ratcliffe Posters N. Biotechnology Plant Management Network Ann Sorenson Larry Chandler, Co-chair Graham Head, Rick Protected Harvest James VanKirk Elaine Wolff Hellmich UPMA Labs Frank Zalom, Chair Frank Zalom, Co-chair O. International IPM Program Committee Web Site/Public Information Doug Pfeiffer 4th National IPM P. Systems Approach and Symposium Pat Cimino Carrie Koplinka-Loehr Landscape Interactions Committees Harold Coble * Ron Stinner Jerry DeWitt ** James VanKirk, Chair Jerry DeWitt National IPM Symposium Tom Fuchs ** Elaine Wolff Q. IPM in Organic Systems Co-Chairs Peter Goodell ** Special Thanks Jerry DeWitt, Geoff Frank Zalom, University of Tom Green Zehnder Janet Garlick California Tom Hall R. Successes in Agricultural Diana Harmon Michael Hoffmann, Cornell Linda Herbst and Urban IPM Michele Kaufman University Michael Hoffmann, Co-chair ** Michael Hoffman Susan Ratcliffe, University of Allison Jones S. Commodity Related Topics Illinois Tom Fuchs 3 program schedule Pre-Symposium Meetings Sunday, April 6 8 AM–5 PM S1010, Dynamic Soybean Pest Management for Evolving Agricultural Technologies and Cropping Systems Grand I Monday, April 7 8 AM–4 PM CropLife International IPM Project Team Caucus 8 AM–5 PM WCC 69–WRIPMC Meeting Council SERA–IEG3 Meeting Grand I NC IPM Congress Certification Advisory Council Cabinet 8 AM–5:30 PM NEREAP Senate I & II 5–8 PM Registration Grand Ballroom Lobby Fourth National Integrated Pest Management Symposium Tuesday, April 8 7–8 AM Continental Breakfast and Informational Meeting for Session Organizers and Steering Committee Grand I 7–8:30 AM Continental Breakfast Grand Ballroom Lobby 7:30 AM–6 PM Registration Grand Ballroom Lobby 8:30–10:10 AM K1 Plenary Session—“Building Alliances for the Future of IPM” Grand IV 8:30 AM Welcome and Introductions, Eldon Ortman, USDA 8:40 AM IPM: Perceptions, Pitfalls, and Promises, Harold Coble, USDA 9:10 AM How Hippos Learn to Dance: Building Public-Private Partnerships, Paul Helliker, California State Department
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Addenda and Amendments to a Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the British Isles on Account of Subsequently Published Data
    Ent Rec 128(2)_Layout 1 22/03/2016 12:53 Page 98 94 Entomologist’s Rec. J. Var. 128 (2016) ADDENDA AND AMENDMENTS TO A CHECKLIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF THE BRITISH ISLES ON ACCOUNT OF SUBSEQUENTLY PUBLISHED DATA 1 DAVID J. L. A GASSIZ , 2 S. D. B EAVAN & 1 R. J. H ECKFORD 1 Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD 2 The Hayes, Zeal Monachorum, Devon EX17 6DF This update incorpotes information published before 25 March 2016 into A Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the British Isles, 2013. CENSUS The number of species now recorded from the British Isles stands at 2535 of which 57 are thought to be extinct and in addition there are 177 adventive species. CHANGE OF STATUS (no longer extinct) p. 17 16.013 remove X, Hall (2013) p. 25 35.006 remove X, Beavan & Heckford (2014) p. 40 45.024 remove X, Wilton (2014) p. 54 49.340 remove X, Manning (2015) ADDITIONAL SPECIES in main list 12.0047 Infurcitinea teriolella (Amsel, 1954) E S W I C 15.0321 Parornix atripalpella Wahlström, 1979 E S W I C 15.0861 Phyllonorycter apparella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) E S W I C 15.0862 Phyllonorycter pastorella (Zeller, 1846) E S W I C 27.0021 Oegoconia novimundi (Busck, 1915) E S W I C 35.0299 Helcystogramma triannulella (Herrich-Sch äffer, 1854) E S W I C 41.0041 Blastobasis maroccanella Amsel, 1952 E S W I C 48.0071 Choreutis nemorana (Hübner, 1799) E S W I C 49.0371 Clepsis dumicolana (Zeller, 1847) E S W I C 49.2001 TETRAMOERA Diakonoff, [1968] langmaidi Plant, 2014 E S W I C 62.0151 Delplanqueia inscriptella (Duponchel, 1836) E S W I C 72.0061 Hypena lividalis (Hübner, 1790) Chevron Snout E S W I C 70.2841 PUNGELARIA Rougemont, 1903 capreolaria ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775) Banded Pine Carpet E S W I C 72.0211 HYPHANTRIA Harris, 1841 cunea (Drury, 1773) Autumn Webworm E S W I C 73.0041 Thysanoplusia daubei (Boisduval, 1840) Boathouse Gem E S W I C 73.0301 Aedia funesta (Esper, 1786) Druid E S W I C Ent Rec 128(2)_Layout 1 22/03/2016 12:53 Page 99 Entomologist’s Rec.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
    Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp. 10 (2) 2010 ISSN 1407 - 8953 MATERIALS ON LATVIAN EUMOLPINAE HOPE, 1840 (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) Andris Bukejs Bukejs A. 2010. Materials on Latvian Eumolpinae Hope, 1840 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp., 10 (2): 107 -114. Faunal, phenological and bibliographical information on Latvian Eumolpinae are presented in the current paper. Bibliographycal analysis on this leaf-beetles subfamily in Latvia is made for the first time. An annotated list of Latvian Eumolpinae including 4 species of 3 genera is given. Key words: Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Eumolpinae, Latvia, fauna, bibliography. Andris Bukejs. Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Vienības 13, Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia; [email protected] INTRODUCTION (Precht 1818, Fleischer 1829). Subsequently, more than 15 works were published. Scarce faunal The subfamily Eumolpinae Hope, 1840 includes records can also be found in following other more than 500 genera and 7000 species distributed articles (Lindberg 1932; Pūtele 1974, 1981a; mainly in the tropics and subtropics (Jolivet & Stiprais 1977; Rūtenberga 1992; Barševskis 1993, Verma 2008). Of them, 11 species of 6 genera are 1997; Telnov & Kalniņš 2003; Telnov et al. 2006, known from eastern Europe (Bieńkowski 2004), 2010; Bukejs & Telnov 2007). and only 4 species of 3 genera – from Fennoscandia and Baltiae (Silfverberg 2004). Imagoes of Eumolpinae feed on leaves of host plants; larvae occur in the soil, feed on In Latvian fauna, 3 genera and 4 species of underground parts of plants; pupate in the soil Eumolpinae are known. In adjacent territories, the (Bieńkowski 2004). number of registered Eumolpinae species slightly varies: Belarus – 5 species are recorded (Lopatin The aim of the current work is to summarize & Nesterova 2005), Estonia – 3 species information on Eumolpinae in Latvia.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Learning Objective
    QUARANTINE SIGNIFICANT LEPIDOPTERA OF CONCERN TO THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES STEVEN PASSOA USDA/APHIS/PPQ 2007 1 LEPIDOPTERA GOALS . Learn techniques of specimen preparation and submission for CAPS Lepidoptera . Develop a list of Lepidoptera of regulatory concern to the southern USA . Learn to SCREEN samples for these species in the stage most likely to be seen by diagnostic labs using the MAJOR characters. Some species are only defined by a combination of features. In those cases, using the associated key and references listed is more accurate. Give examples from the major superfamilies . Distributions and hosts mentioned are the most likely pathways 2 DEVELOP A LIST . Criteria originally modified from biocontrol of weeds list in July 1991 memo, then modified by NEPSC committee . Now widely used in APHIS as mini-PRA . Survey methodology and taxonomic recognition added to economic criteria . Results are either threats (no pathway), CAPS targets (need to survey), or a dead survey (not practical to consider) 3 WHY LABS HATE TO IDENTIFY LEPIDOPTERA . Secret society of critical characters . Constant name changes . Characters hard to see, covered with scales, or both 4 EGGS . Two types . Do not kill important finds and sent urgent . Plan to rear them in a quarantine facility . Spodoptera and Lymantria (and others) cover the eggs with scales from the female’s body 5 LARVAE . Associate leaf miners with the mine and host . Mouthparts are the “genitalia” of the larval world . Fill vials so there is no air bubble when shipping . “Burp” rubber stoppers and parafilm screw top vials . Can kill and ship in vinegar . Put loose parts in small vials 6 PUPAE .
    [Show full text]
  • Insecticides - Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies
    INSECTICIDES - DEVELOPMENT OF SAFER AND MORE EFFECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES Edited by Stanislav Trdan Insecticides - Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/3356 Edited by Stanislav Trdan Contributors Mahdi Banaee, Philip Koehler, Alexa Alexander, Francisco Sánchez-Bayo, Juliana Cristina Dos Santos, Ronald Zanetti Bonetti Filho, Denilson Ferrreira De Oliveira, Giovanna Gajo, Dejane Santos Alves, Stuart Reitz, Yulin Gao, Zhongren Lei, Christopher Fettig, Donald Grosman, A. Steven Munson, Nabil El-Wakeil, Nawal Gaafar, Ahmed Ahmed Sallam, Christa Volkmar, Elias Papadopoulos, Mauro Prato, Giuliana Giribaldi, Manuela Polimeni, Žiga Laznik, Stanislav Trdan, Shehata E. M. Shalaby, Gehan Abdou, Andreia Almeida, Francisco Amaral Villela, João Carlos Nunes, Geri Eduardo Meneghello, Adilson Jauer, Moacir Rossi Forim, Bruno Perlatti, Patrícia Luísa Bergo, Maria Fátima Da Silva, João Fernandes, Christian Nansen, Solange Maria De França, Mariana Breda, César Badji, José Vargas Oliveira, Gleberson Guillen Piccinin, Alan Augusto Donel, Alessandro Braccini, Gabriel Loli Bazo, Keila Regina Hossa Regina Hossa, Fernanda Brunetta Godinho Brunetta Godinho, Lilian Gomes De Moraes Dan, Maria Lourdes Aldana Madrid, Maria Isabel Silveira, Fabiola-Gabriela Zuno-Floriano, Guillermo Rodríguez-Olibarría, Patrick Kareru, Zachaeus Kipkorir Rotich, Esther Wamaitha Maina, Taema Imo Published by InTech Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia Copyright © 2013 InTech All chapters are Open Access distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. After this work has been published by InTech, authors have the right to republish it, in whole or part, in any publication of which they are the author, and to make other personal use of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabbage Aphid Brevicoryne Brassicae Linnaeus (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae)1 Harsimran Kaur Gill, Harsh Garg, and Jennifer L
    EENY577 Cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae Linnaeus (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae)1 Harsimran Kaur Gill, Harsh Garg, and Jennifer L. Gillett-Kaufman2 Introduction The cabbage aphid belongs to the genus Brevicoryne. The name is derived from the Latin words “brevi” and “coryne” and which loosely translates as “small pipes”. In aphids, there are two small pipes called cornicles or siphunculi (tailpipe-like appendages) at the posterior end that can be seen if you look with a hand lens. The cornicles of the cab- bage aphid are relatively shorter than those of other aphids with the exception of the turnip aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach). These short cornicles and the waxy coating found on cabbage aphids help differentiate cabbage aphids from other aphids that may attack the same host plant Figure 1. Cabbage aphids, Brevicoryne brassicae Linnaeus, on cabbage. (Carter and Sorensen 2013, Opfer and McGrath 2013). Credits: Lyle Buss, UF/IFAS Cabbage aphids cause significant yield losses to many crops of the family Brassicaceae, which includes the mustards and Identification crucifers. It is important to have a comprehensive under- The cabbage aphid is difficult to distinguish from the turnip standing of this pest and its associated control measures so aphid (Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach)). The cabbage aphid that its spread and damage can be prevented. is 2.0 to 2.5 mm long and covered with a grayish waxy covering, but the turnip aphid is 1.6 to 2.2 mm long and has Distribution no such covering (Carter and Sorensen 2013). The cabbage aphid is native to Europe, but now has a world- The cabbage aphid and green peach aphid (Myzus persicae wide distribution (Kessing and Mau 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcodes for Bio-Surveillance
    Page 1 of 44 DNA Barcodes for Bio-surveillance: Regulated and Economically Important Arthropod Plant Pests Muhammad Ashfaq* and Paul D.N. Hebert Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada * Corresponding author: Muhammad Ashfaq Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada Email: [email protected] Phone: (519) 824-4120 Ext. 56393 Genome Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 99.245.208.197 on 09/06/16 1 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from final official version of record. Page 2 of 44 Abstract Many of the arthropod species that are important pests of agriculture and forestry are impossible to discriminate morphologically throughout all of their life stages. Some cannot be differentiated at any life stage. Over the past decade, DNA barcoding has gained increasing adoption as a tool to both identify known species and to reveal cryptic taxa. Although there has not been a focused effort to develop a barcode library for them, reference sequences are now available for 77% of the 409 species of arthropods documented on major pest databases. Aside from developing the reference library needed to guide specimen identifications, past barcode studies have revealed that a significant fraction of arthropod pests are a complex of allied taxa. Because of their importance as pests and disease vectors impacting global agriculture and forestry, DNA barcode results on these arthropods have significant implications for quarantine detection, regulation, and management.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Agr. Nat. Resour. 54 (2020) 499–506 AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES Journal homepage: http://anres.kasetsart.org Research article Checklist of the Tribe Spilomelini (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Pyraustinae) in Thailand Sunadda Chaovalita,†, Nantasak Pinkaewb,†,* a Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand b Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaengsaen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaengsaen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand Article Info Abstract Article history: In total, 100 species in 40 genera of the tribe Spilomelini were confirmed to occur in Thailand Received 5 July 2019 based on the specimens preserved in Thailand and Japan. Of these, 47 species were new records Revised 25 July 2019 Accepted 15 August 2019 for Thailand. Conogethes tenuialata Chaovalit and Yoshiyasu, 2019 was the latest new recorded Available online 30 October 2020 species from Thailand. This information will contribute to an ongoing program to develop a pest database and subsequently to a facilitate pest management scheme in Thailand. Keywords: Crambidae, Pyraustinae, Spilomelini, Thailand, pest Introduction The tribe Spilomelini is one of the major pests in tropical and subtropical regions. Moths in this tribe have been considered as The tribe Spilomelini Guenée (1854) is one of the largest tribes and the major pests of economic crops such as rice, sugarcane, bean belongs to the subfamily Pyraustinae, family Crambidae; it consists of pods and corn (Khan et al., 1988; Hill, 2007), durian (Kuroko 55 genera and 5,929 species worldwide with approximately 86 genera and Lewvanich, 1993), citrus, peach and macadamia, (Common, and 220 species of Spilomelini being reported in North America 1990), mulberry (Sharifi et.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids
    4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids Lawrence M. Hanks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois Qiao Wang Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand CONTENTS 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 133 4.2 Phenology of Adults ..................................................................................................................... 134 4.3 Diet of Adults ............................................................................................................................... 138 4.4 Location of Host Plants and Mates .............................................................................................. 138 4.5 Recognition of Mates ................................................................................................................... 140 4.6 Copulation .................................................................................................................................... 141 4.7 Larval Host Plants, Oviposition Behavior, and Larval Development .......................................... 142 4.8 Mating Strategy ............................................................................................................................ 144 4.9 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 148 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum Évkönyve 79. (Budapest 1987)
    ANNALES HISTORICO-NATURALES MUSEI NATIONALIS HUNGARICI Tomus 79. Budapest, 1987 p. 167-178. Taxonomic and zoogeographical studies on the subfamily Plusiinae (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). The Palaeotropical, Oriental and Nearctic material of the Zoological Museum, Copenhagen by L. RONKAY, Budapest L. RONKAY: Taxonomic and zoogeographical studies on the subfamily Plusiinae (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). The Palaeotropical, Oriental and Nearctic material of the Zoological Museum, Copen­ hagen. — Annls hist.-nat. Mus. natn. hung. 1987 79: 167-178. Abstract — Three new genera, Anaplusia gen. n., Extremoplusia gen. n. and Scriptoplusia gen. n. and one new species, Scriptoplusia noona sp. n. are described and an annotated list of 50 species from N America, Africa and the Oriental Region is given. With 26 figures and 1 photoplate. In 1986Ihadtthe opportunity to study the Palaeotropical, Nearctic and Indo-Australian Plusiinae material of the Zoological Museum of Copenhagen. During the course of this work I could study in details some species which had not been relagated to any described genera. These studies, based on the external and genitalic morphology including the characteristics of the vesica, have shown the necessity to erect three new genera for these taxa. — The whole material contains specimens of 50 species, one of them is new for science and there are several previously unknown distribution records of the species. I would like to express my thanks to Dr. Ole Karsholt (Zool. Mus., Copenhagen) for his exten­ sive help in this work and also to Dr. L. Gozmány (Budapest) for his useful advice. 1. DESCRIPriON OF THE NEW TAXA It is an interesting fact that there are some species, distributed over the Eastern-South­ eastern border of the Palaearctic Region to Indonesia, Australia and New Guinea, which appear to be remote from any well-known genera of the Eastern Tropical Plusiinae.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Review of the Mite Genus Gaeolaelaps Evans & Till (Acari: Laelapidae)
    Zootaxa 2158: 33–49 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Review of the mite genus Gaeolaelaps Evans & Till (Acari: Laelapidae), and description of a new species from North America, G. gillespiei n. sp. FRÉDÉRIC BEAULIEU Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The concept of the genus Gaeolaelaps of the mite family Laelapidae is reviewed, based on species descriptions in the literature and the examination of specimens of selected described and undescribed species. A short diagnosis and a description of the genus is presented, showing the range of morphological character states and indicating species that depart from the typical character states. Gaeolaelaps is restored from subgeneric to generic rank. A new species, G. gillespiei n. sp., is described from adult female and male specimens. This species shows promise in the control of fungus gnats and thrips on greenhouse cucumbers in British Columbia, Canada. It is a relative of the well known biocontrol agent Gaeolaelaps (or Hypoaspis) aculeifer, but presents a set of morphological traits that distinguish it from G. aculeifer and other related species. The diversity of soil-dwelling mesostigmatic mites remains poorly explored, and so is their potential for biological control. Key words: Hypoaspis, Hypoaspidinae, Mesostigmata, predatory mite, biocontrol Introduction The mesostigmatic mite family Laelapidae is ecologically diverse, and comprises obligate and facultative parasites of vertebrates, insect paraphages, and free-living predators that inhabit soil-litter habitats, as well as the nests of vertebrates and arthropods (Strong & Halliday 1994; Krantz & Walter 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Pest Management in Greenhouses and Interiorscapes E
    Arthropod Pest Management in Greenhouses and Interiorscapes E-1011E-1011 OklahomaOklahoma CooperativeCooperative ExtensionExtension ServiceService DivisionDivision ofof AgriculturalAgricultural SciencesSciences andand NaturalNatural ResourcesResources OklahomaOklahoma StateState UniversityUniversity Arthropod Pest Management in Greenhouses and Interiorscapes E-1011 Eric J. Rebek Extension Entomologist/ Ornamentals and Turfgrass Specialist Michael A. Schnelle Extension Ornamentals/ Floriculture Specialist ArthropodArthropod PestPest ManagementManagement inin GreenhousesGreenhouses andand InteriorscapesInteriorscapes Insects and their relatives cause major plant ing a hand lens. damage in commercial greenhouses and interi- Aphids feed on buds, leaves, stems, and roots orscapes. Identification of key pests and an un- by inserting their long, straw-like, piercing-suck- derstanding of appropriate control measures are ing mouthparts (stylets) and withdrawing plant essential to guard against costly crop losses. With sap. Expanding leaves from damaged buds may be tightening regulations on conventional insecti- curled or twisted and attacked leaves often display cides and increasing consumer sensitivity to their chlorotic (yellow-white) speckles where cell con- use in public spaces, growers must seek effective tents have been removed. A secondary problem pest management alternatives to conventional arises from sugary honeydew excreted by aphids. chemical control. Management strategies cen- Leaves may appear shiny and become sticky from tered around
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Abundance of the Cabbage Aphid Brevicoryne Brassicae
    Egypt. J. Plant Prot. Res. Inst. (2020), 3 (4): 1121-1128 Egyptian Journal of Plant Protection Research Institute www.ejppri.eg.net Seasonal abundance of the cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae (Hemiptera : Aphididae) infesting canola plants in relation with associated natural enemies and weather factors in Sohag Governorate Waleed, A. Mahmoud Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. ARTICLE INFO Abstract: Article History Received: 19 / 10 /2020 Canola (Brassica napus L.) is grown in more than 120 Accepted: 22 / 12 /2020 countries around the world, including Egypt, hold the third position oil crop after palm and soybean oils . the cabbage aphid Keywords Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera : Aphididae) is distributed in many parts of the world and is present in Egypt, especially in Brevicoryne brassicae, Upper Egypt. Its damage occurs on the plant leaves and transmit population, canola, plant viruses. The present studies were carried at The Experimental parasitoid, predators, Farm of Shandweel Agricultural Research Station, Sohag temperature and Governorate, Egypt during the winter seasons of 2017/2018 and humidity. 2018/2019 to investigate the population density of the cabbage aphid B. brassicae infesting canola in relation to some biotic and abiotic factors in Sohag Governorate. Data revealed that aphid started to take place in canola fields during the first week of December in both seasons (36 days after planting), then increased to reach its peak in at 20th and 13th February in the two seasons (Between 106 to 113 days after planting), respectively. The parasitism rate by Diaeretiella rapae (MacIntosh) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) simultaneously increased as aphid populations increased in both seasons, also, the highest parasitism percentages were synchronization of the aphid numbers reduction in both seasons.
    [Show full text]