Answer of the Federal Government to the Minor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Answer of the Federal Government to the Minor Answer of the Federal Government to the Minor Interpellation submitted by the Members of the Bundestag Andrei Hunko, Jan van Aken, Christine Buchholz, Annette Groth, Inge Höger, Ulla Jelpke, Jan Korte, Dr Alexander S. Neu, Martina Renner, Dr Petra Sitte and the Left Party parliamentary group Bundestag printed paper 18-5983 of 14 September 2015 The coordination of European communication strategies in the Club of Venice Preliminary remarks of the questioners The Club of Venice is a forum in which “communication professionals” from EU Members States convene. According to the information posted on the website (https://clubofvenice.wordpress.com) of the informal network founded in 1986, these professionals are members of the government. From Germany the Federal Foreign Office is involved. Several times a year, meetings and workshops take place during which subjects pertaining to “common interests” are discussed. It is also stated that the “Club of Venice” is used to present individual practices from the Member States and provide assurances of mutual support. No specific content is stated, however. Instead, there is the vague statement that the club deals with “public communications in the age of austerity”, “public diplomacy”, reputation management for public institutions, crisis communications following natural disasters and emergencies and “impact and applications of social/digital media on government communications”. Presumably this means the “strategic communications” such as those adopted in relation to Russia (European Council Conclusions on External Relations of 19 March 2015). Preliminary remarks of the Federal Government The Club of Venice was founded in 1986 by a small group of communications professionals from governments throughout the whole of Europe (at that time the European Community had 12 members) to exchange experiences on communications topics and formats in an informal setting. The activities of the Club of Venice are not recorded in the form of minutes. The Belgian Federal Information Service and the French Government Information Service initiated the publication of the newsletter entitled “Convergences”. This newsletter, which has been published since 2012, reports on the club’s activities (in particular, on contributions and discussions at the plenary meetings) and was primarily designed to be read by the members and their staff. It can be viewed on the website https://clubofvenice.wordpress.com/, which also provides access to current information and news about the club and the events it organises. We ask the Federal Government: 1. Since when has the Federal Government been a member of the Club of Venice and what was the reason for it joining this group? The Federal Government has been a member of the Club of Venice since 1986. The Federal Government joined the Club of Venice as it is interested in an informal exchange of opinions on public and media relations in the European Union outside of the European institutions. 2. Which members of which ministries or other Federal Government institutions have taken part in which meetings of the Club of Venice so far? In addition to the informal plenary meetings twice a year, expert workshops on communications issues are organised from time to time lasting one to two days, or in other cases, EU Member States open up their own, national workshops to representatives of other Member States. The Club of Venice meetings were attended by staff from different levels: by deputy government spokespersons, heads of department, heads of section and desk officers from the Federal Press Office (BPA). The Federal Foreign Office’s Communications Commissioner attended the autumn 2014 meeting and the spring 2015 meeting of the club, a desk officer from the Federal Foreign Office attended the workshop on digital communication trends in Sofia at the end of March 2015. 3. What contributions of their own did the members of the Federal Government present or produce there? Representatives of the Federal Government gave presentations on best practice, of their own projects (for instance the EU management partnership) and shared experiences on communications technologies at the various meetings. 4. How have federal agencies already benefited from forms of support provided by the Club of Venice? The club is not designed to provide formal forms of support, but rather to be a platform for an informal exchange with the Member States of the EU and the European institutions, in particular the European Commission and the European Parliament. In addition to the informal plenary meetings twice a year, one to two-day expert workshops are held from time to time on communications issues or in other cases EU Member States open up their own, national workshops to representatives of other Member States. 5. Which "communications professionals" from which EU Member States, EU institutions or other institutions does the Club of Venice bring together to the knowledge of the Federal Government? Members of the Club of Venice include, for instance, Vincenzo Le Voci, from the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, who is also Secretary General of the Club of Venice and Administrator Claus Hörr, Director of the Press and Media Department at the Austrian Federal Chancellery Arlin Bagdat, Director-General, External Communication of the Belgian PM Chancellery. Please also refer to the attached list of members for June 2015. This also details contacts at the government agencies of the EU Member States working in the field of communications. The members of the Steering Committee, which is a forum for preparing the plenary meetings, and who are also members of the Club of Venice, can be found on the club’s homepage: https://clubofvenice.wordpress.com/about/steering-committee Steering Committee • Arlin Bagdat, Director-General, External Communication, PM Chancellery (Belgium) • Fiorenza Barazzoni, Director, Department for EU Policies, Office for Internal Market and Competitiveness, Presidency of the Council of Ministers (Italy) • Nathalie Chavanon, Deputy Director, Government Information Service (France) • Michael Reiffenstuel, Director for Cultural Relations Policy, German Schools Abroad, German Language Network and Deputy Director General for Culture and Communication, Federal Foreign Office (Germany, ad interim) • Erik den Hoedt, Director, Public Information and Communications Office (Netherlands) • Lefteris Kretsos, Secretary-General for Information and Communication (Greece) • Laine Kucinska, Head of the Communication Department, State Chancellery (Latvia) • Claus Hörr, Director, Department 7/2, Press and Media Service, Bundeskanzleramt (Austria) • Vincenzo Le Voci, Secretary General of the Club of Venice and Administrator, Information Policy, General Secretariat of the Council of the EU Members of the Advisory Group are: • Stefano Rolando, Honorary President of the Club of Venice (Italy) • Mieke van den Berghe, Honorary Vice-President (Belgium) • Judit Gyarfas Fekete, Honorary Vice-President (Hungary) • Hans Brunmayr, Honorary Vice-President (Austria) • Niels Thergersen, Honorary Vice-President (Denmark) • Mike Granatt, Club of Venice Co-ordinator (United Kingdom) • Aurelio Sahagun Pool, Former Communications Director for the Spanish Prime Minister (Spain) 6. What knowledge does the Federal Government have as to which agencies or other institutions of the European Union work with the Club of Venice? To the knowledge of the Federal Government, the European Commission and the General Secretariat of the Council of the EU are involved in the preparation and execution. Discussion materials are sometimes also provided by Eurostat, the EU’s statistics office. 7. What knowledge does the Federal Government have as to which private establishments work with the Club of Venice? For specific topics, experts from think tanks, foundations or scientific and academic institutions are invited to some discussion events (for instance the "Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, Brussels). The content of their contributions to the plenary meetings is presented transparently in the seven “Convergences” newsletters published on the website: https://clubofvenice.wordpress.com/convergances-magazine/. 8. What knowledge does the Federal Government have from its own information or forms of cooperation on the aims and objectives pursued by the Club of Venice? The Club of Venice has set itself the aim of fostering the continuous exchange of ideas and knowledge between the heads of communication units of the governments of the EU Member States and the EU institutions in an informal format. At the fore in this exchange are communications expertise and professionalism as well as mutual support in communicating complex political challenges. 9. In what way is the cooperation in the Club of Venice implemented to the knowledge of the Federal Government? a) How is the group financed? Every EU Member State hosting a Club of Venice event finances this itself. The participants pay for their travel and accommodation costs themselves. b) Which working groups or sub-working groups exist in the Club of Venice? There are no set working groups and sub-working groups. The members of the Steering Committee stay in touch by telephone and prepare the semi-annual plenary meetings together with the Administrator/Secretary General. As a general rule, representatives of the Federal Government have taken part in these plenary sessions. c) To what extent does the Club of Venice have a secretariat or other fixed structures? The club does not
Recommended publications
  • The Kremlin Trojan Horses | the Atlantic Council
    Atlantic Council DINU PATRICIU EURASIA CENTER THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Russian Influence in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski ISBN: 978-1-61977-518-3. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Foreword Introduction: The Kremlin’s Toolkit of Influence 3 in Europe 7 France: Mainstreaming Russian Influence 13 Germany: Interdependence as Vulnerability 20 United Kingdom: Vulnerable but Resistant Policy recommendations: Resisting Russia’s 27 Efforts to Influence, Infiltrate, and Inculcate 29 About the Authors THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES FOREWORD In 2014, Russia seized Crimea through military force. With this act, the Kremlin redrew the political map of Europe and upended the rules of the acknowledged international order. Despite the threat Russia’s revanchist policies pose to European stability and established international law, some European politicians, experts, and civic groups have expressed support for—or sympathy with—the Kremlin’s actions. These allies represent a diverse network of political influence reaching deep into Europe’s core. The Kremlin uses these Trojan horses to destabilize European politics so efficiently, that even Russia’s limited might could become a decisive factor in matters of European and international security.
    [Show full text]
  • Drucksache 18/10796
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 18/10796 18. Wahlperiode 22.12.2016 Unterrichtung durch die Delegation der Bundesrepublik Deutschland in der Parlamentarischen Versammlung des Europarates Tagung der Parlamentarischen Versammlung des Europarates vom 20. bis 24. Juni 2016 Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite I. Delegationsmitglieder ..................................................................... 2 II. Einführung ...................................................................................... 3 III. Ablauf der 3. Sitzungswoche 2016 ................................................. 4 III.1 Wahlen und Geschäftsordnungsfragen ............................................. 4 III.2 Schwerpunkte der Beratungen .......................................................... 4 III.3 Auswärtige Redner ............................................................................ 9 IV. Tagesordnung der 3. Sitzungswoche 2016 .................................... 10 V. Verabschiedete Empfehlungen und Entschließungen ................. 13 VI. Reden deutscher Delegationsmitglieder ........................................ 43 VII. Funktionsträger der Parlamentarischen Versammlung des Europarates ............................................................................... 51 VIII. Ständiger Ausschuss vom 27. Mai 2016 in Tallinn ....................... 53 IX. Mitgliedsländer des Europarates ................................................... 55 Drucksache 18/10796 – 2 – Deutscher Bundestag – 18. Wahlperiode I. Delegationsmitglieder Unter Vorsitz von Delegationsleiter
    [Show full text]
  • Plenarprotokoll 17/30
    Plenarprotokoll 17/30 Deutscher Bundestag Stenografischer Bericht 30. Sitzung Berlin, Mittwoch, den 17. März 2010 Inhalt: Tagesordnungspunkt I (Fortsetzung): Wolfgang Börnsen (Bönstrup) (CDU/CSU) 2744 C a) Zweite Beratung des von der Bundesregie- Dr. Lukrezia Jochimsen (DIE LINKE) . 2745 C rung eingebrachten Entwurfs eines Geset- Reiner Deutschmann (FDP) . 2746 B zes über die Feststellung des Bundes- haushaltsplans für das Haushaltsjahr Tabea Rößner (BÜNDNIS 90/ 2010 (Haushaltsgesetz 2010) DIE GRÜNEN) . 2747 C (Drucksachen 17/200, 17/201) . 2705 A Siegmund Ehrmann (SPD) . 2748 C b) Beschlussempfehlung des Haushaltsaus- schusses zu der Unterrichtung durch die Namentliche Abstimmung . Bundesregierung: Finanzplan des Bundes 2749 B 2009 bis 2013 (Drucksachen 16/13601, 17/626) . 2705 B Ergebnis . 2752 C 9 Einzelplan 04 10 Einzelplan 05 Bundeskanzlerin und Bundeskanzleramt Auswärtiges Amt (Drucksachen 17/604, 17/623) . 2705 B (Drucksachen 17/605, 17/623) . 2749 C Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier (SPD) . 2705 D Klaus Brandner (SPD) . 2749 C Dr. Angela Merkel, Bundeskanzlerin . 2711 A Dr. Guido Westerwelle, Bundesminister AA . Dr. Gregor Gysi (DIE LINKE) . 2720 A 2754 B Wolfgang Gehrcke (DIE LINKE) . 2756 C Birgit Homburger (FDP) . 2725 A Herbert Frankenhauser (CDU/CSU) . 2758 B Renate Künast (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 2730 B Sven-Christian Kindler (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 2759 A Volker Beck (Köln) (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 2734 C Klaus Brandner (SPD) . 2759 B Birgit Homburger (FDP) . 2734 D Kerstin Müller (Köln) (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 2761 A Volker Kauder (CDU/CSU) . 2735 B Dr. h. c. Jürgen Koppelin (FDP) . 2761 C Dr. Barbara Hendricks (SPD) . 2736 B Dr. Rainer Stinner (FDP) . 2763 D Bernd Scheelen (SPD) .
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Peter Gauweiler (CDU/CSU)
    Inhaltsverzeichnis Plenarprotokoll 18/9 Deutscher Bundestag Stenografischer Bericht 9. Sitzung Berlin, Freitag, den 17. Januar 2014 Inhalt: Tagesordnungspunkt 15: Tagesordnungspunkt 16: Vereinbarte Debatte: zum Arbeitsprogramm Antrag der Abgeordneten Ulla Jelpke, Jan der Europäischen Kommission . 503 B Korte, Katrin Kunert, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion DIE LINKE: Das Massen- Axel Schäfer (Bochum) (SPD) . 503 B sterben an den EU-Außengrenzen been- Alexander Ulrich (DIE LINKE) . 505 A den – Für eine offene, solidarische und hu- mane Flüchtlingspolitik der Europäischen Gunther Krichbaum (CDU/CSU) . 506 C Union Drucksache 18/288 . 524 D Manuel Sarrazin (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 508 C Ulla Jelpke (DIE LINKE) . 525 A Michael Roth, Staatsminister Charles M. Huber (CDU/CSU) . 525 D AA . 510 A Thomas Silberhorn (CDU/CSU) . 528 A Britta Haßelmann (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 510 C Luise Amtsberg (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 530 A Andrej Hunko (DIE LINKE) . 511 D Christina Kampmann (SPD) . 532 A Manuel Sarrazin (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 512 B Wolfgang Gehrcke (DIE LINKE) . 533 D Detlef Seif (CDU/CSU) . 513 A Stephan Mayer (Altötting) (CDU/CSU) . 534 D Dr. Diether Dehm (DIE LINKE) . 513 C Volker Beck (Köln) (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 535 C Annalena Baerbock (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 514 D Harald Petzold (Havelland) (DIE LINKE) . 536 A Annalena Baerbock (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 515 D Wolfgang Gehrcke (DIE LINKE) . 536 D Dagmar Schmidt (Wetzlar) (SPD) . 517 B Tom Koenigs (BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN) . 538 A Jürgen Hardt (CDU/CSU) . 518 C Sabine Bätzing-Lichtenthäler (SPD) . 539 A Norbert Spinrath (SPD) . 520 C Marian Wendt (CDU/CSU) . 540 C Dr. Peter Gauweiler (CDU/CSU) .
    [Show full text]
  • Drucksache 19/22675 19
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 19/22675 19. Wahlperiode 18.09.2020 Schriftliche Fragen mit den in der Woche vom 14. September 2020 eingegangenen Antworten der Bundesregierung Verzeichnis der Fragenden Abgeordnete Nummer Abgeordnete Nummer der Frage der Frage Achelwilm, Doris (DIE LINKE.) ...................1 Fricke, Otto (FDP) ............................47, 97 Akbulut, Gökay (DIE LINKE.) .................. 31 Gastel, Matthias Alt, Renata (FDP) ............................... 111 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................. 98 Amtsberg, Luise Göring-Eckardt, Katrin (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................. 16 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................. 65 Bartsch, Dietmar, Dr. (DIE LINKE.) ............. 82 Gohlke, Nicole (DIE LINKE.) .............. 18, 113 Bauer, Nicole (FDP) ..........................76, 77 Hahn, André, Dr. (DIE LINKE.) ................. 71 Bause, Margarete Hanke, Reginald (FDP) .......................54, 83 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................. 32 Held, Marcus (SPD) ........................ 99, 100 Bayaz, Danyal, Dr. Helling-Plahr, Katrin (FDP) ...................... 55 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................2, 3 Hemmelgarn, Udo Theodor (AfD) .......... 66, 101 Bayram, Canan Herbrand, Markus (FDP) ........................7, 8 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) ...............53, 80 Hess, Martin (AfD) ...................19, 20, 21, 56 Brantner, Franziska, Dr. (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) ...........17, 33, 34 Hessel, Katja (FDP) ................................9 Buchholz, Christine (DIE LINKE.) ............35, 36 Höchst, Nicole
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010 Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT 2010 CONTENTS EDITORIAL 2 BUILDING BRIDGES: 20 YEARS OF THE ROSA LUXEMBURG FOUNDATION 4 Award-winning east-west projects 5 Posters from 20 years of the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation 6 KEY ISSUE: AUTOMOBILES, ENERGY AND POLITICS 8 «Power to the People» conference of the Academy of Political Education 9 «Auto.Mobil.Krise.» Conference of the Institute for Social Analysis 10 THE ACADEMY OF POLITICAL EDUCATION 12 PUBLICATIONS OF THE ROSA LUXEMBURG FOUNDATION 16 EDUCATIONAL WORK IN THE FEDERAL STATES 20 CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL DIALOGUE AND COOPERATION 32 Interview with the new director of the Centre, Wilfried Telkämper 33 New presences: The Foundations in Belgrade and Quito 34 Africa Conference «Resistance and awakening» 35 Visit by El Salvador’s foreign minister 36 Israel and Palestine: Gender dimensions. Conference in Brussels 36 RELAUNCH OF THE FOUNDATION WEBSITE 40 PROJECT SPONSORSHIP 42 FINANCIAL AND CONCEPTUAL SUPPORT: THE SCHOLARSHIP DEPARTMENT 52 Academic tutors 54 Conferences of the scholarship department 56 RosAlumni – an association for former scholarship recipients 57 Scholarship recipient and rabbi: Alina Treiger 57 ARCHIVE AND LIBRARY 58 Finding aid 58 What is a finding aid? 59 About the Foundation’s library: Interview with Uwe Michel 60 THE CULTURAL FORUM OF THE ROSA LUXEMBURG FOUNDATION 61 PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT 64 THE FOUNDATION’S BODIES 66 General Assembly 66 Executive Board 68 Scientific Advisory Council 69 Discussion Groups 70 ORGANIGRAM 72 THE FOUNDATION’S BUDGET 74 PUBLISHING DETAILS/PHOTOS 80 1 Editorial Dear readers, new political developments, the movements for democratic change in many Arab countries, or the natural and nuclear disaster in Japan all point to one thing: we must be careful about assumed certainties.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration, Integration, Asylum: Political Developments in Germany 2015 Grote, Janne; Müller, Andreas; Vollmer, Michael
    www.ssoar.info Migration, Integration, Asylum: Political Developments in Germany 2015 Grote, Janne; Müller, Andreas; Vollmer, Michael Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Forschungsbericht / research report Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Grote, J., Müller, A., & Vollmer, M. (2016). Migration, Integration, Asylum: Political Developments in Germany 2015. (Annual Policy Report / Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) Forschungszentrum Migration, Integration und Asyl (FZ)). Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) Forschungszentrum Migration, Integration und Asyl (FZ); Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) Nationale Kontaktstelle für das Europäische Migrationsnetzwerk (EMN). https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-68289-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses
    [Show full text]
  • Keine Alternative(N) Für Deutschland Und Europa
    KEINE ALTERNATIVE(N) FÜR DEUTSCHLAND UND EUROPA ALBAN WERNER EINE OPPOSITIONSTHEORETISCHE ANALYSE DEUTSCHER EURO- KRITIK IN DER KRISE1 »The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else« John Maynard Keynes »…auch die Theorie wird zur materiellen Gewalt, sobald sie die Massen ergreift« Karl Marx, Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie. Einleitung 1. EINLEITUNG Die beiden Legislaturperioden des Bundestags ab 2005 waren davon geprägt, dass es für deutsche Verhältnisse ein ungewöhnliches, weil schnelles Auf und Ab oppositioneller AkteurInnen gegeben hat. Die Wortneuschöpfungen des „Wut“- und „Mutbürgers“ reflektieren diese Entwicklung. Sie rufen sofort die Protestbewegung gegen das Bahnhofsprojekt Stuttgart 21 in Erinnerung, die Anti-Atom-Demonstrationen und das wahlpolitische Hoch der Grünen, die hiesigen Ableger der Occupy-Bewegung, die Piraten-Partei und, wenn man den Blick auf den nicht-progressiven Teil des politischen Spektrums erweitert, die sensationell erfolgreiche direktdemokratische Initiative gegen die Schulreformpolitik des schwarz-grünen Hamburger Senats. Das erfolgreichste politische Buch der Nachkriegszeit „Deutschland schafft sich ab“ von Thilo Sarrazin begründete zwar keine oppositionelle Bewegung, wurde aber von vielen „Wutbürgern“ zum Anlass genommen, ihrer Gegnerschaft zur Sozial- und Integrationspolitik bei Veranstaltungen und auf Leserbriefseiten Ausdruck zu verleihen. Die Anfang 2013 gegründete Partei Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) ist insofern nur eine von vielen Spielarten politischer Opposition in einem politischen Konjunkturzyklus. Ich gehe davon aus, dass die AfD bei der Bundestagswahl 2013 noch ohne Erfolg blei- ben wird, und dass die mangelnde wahlpolitische Resonanz auf ihre eigene Strategie und Struktur zurück- geht.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF-Download
    BUNDESVERFASSUNGSGERICHT Verkündet - 2 BvQ 22/19 - am 15. April 2019 Fischböck IM NAMEN DES VOLKES als Urkundsbeamtin In dem Verfahren der Geschäftsstelle über den Antrag, im Wege der einstweiligen Anordnung § 6a Absatz 1 Nummer 2 und 3 des Europawahlgesetzes – auch in Verbindung mit § 6a Absatz 2 Nummer 1 des Europawahlgesetzes – für die neunte Wahl der Abgeordneten des Europäischen Parlaments aus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (vgl. BGBl I 2018 Seite 1646) für nicht anwendbar zu erklären, Antragsteller: Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages 1.Doris Achelwilm, 2.Grigorios Aggelidis, 3.Gökay Akbulut, 4.Renata Alt, 5.Luise Amtsberg, 6.Kerstin Andreae, 7.Christine Aschenberg-Dugnus, 8.Lisa Badum, 1/16 9.Annalena Baerbock, 10.Simone Barrientos, 11.Dr. Dietmar Bartsch, 12.Nicole Bauer, 13.Margarete Bause, 14.Dr. Danyal Bayaz, 15.Canan Bayram, 16.Jens Beeck, 17.Nicola Beer, 18.Matthias W. Birkwald, 19.Heidrun Bluhm, 20.Dr. Jens Brandenburg, 21.Mario Brandenburg, 22.Michael Brandt, 23.Dr. Franziska Brantner, 24.Agnieszka Brugger, 2/16 25.Christine Buchholz, 26.Birke Bull-Bischoff, 27.Dr. Marco Buschmann, 28.Karlheinz Busen, 29.Jörg Cezanne, 30.Dr. Anna Christmann, 31.Carl-Julius Cronenberg, 32.Sevim Dagdelen, 33.Britta Katharina Dassler, 34.Dr. Diether Dehm, 35.Ekin Deligöz, 36.Fabio De Masi, 37.Bijan Djir-Sarai, 38.Katja Dörner, 39.Anke Domscheit-Berg, 40.Katharina Dröge, 3/16 41.Christian Dürr, 42.Hartmut Ebbing, 43.Harald Ebner, 44.Klaus Ernst, 45.Dr. Marcus Faber, 46.Susanne Ferschl, 47.Daniel Föst, 48.Brigitte Freihold, 49.Otto Fricke, 50.Sylvia Gabelmann, 51.Matthias Gastel, 52.Kai Gehring, 53.Stefan Gelbhaar, 54.Katrin Göring-Eckardt, 55.Nicole Gohlke, 56.Erhard Grundl, 4/16 57.Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics of Emerging and Disruptive Technologies
    GEOPOLITICS OF EMERGING AND DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES 1 GEOPOLITICS OF EMERGING AND DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES Michał Rekowski, ToMasz PiekaRz, BaRBaRa szTokfisz, RoBert siudak, izaBela alBRychT, PRzeMysław Roguski, Paweł kosTkiewicz, Maciej siciaRek, kRzyszTof silicki, Magdalena wRzosek, ToMasz dylik, TeodoR BuchneR, joanna ŚwiąTkowska, andRea g. RodRíguez, kaMil Mikulski EDITORS: izaBela alBRychT, Michał Rekowski, kaMil Mikulski AUTHORS: Michał Rekowski TABle of conTenTS International Competition in the Digital Age Tomasz Piekarz Digital Technologies as an Element of Power Barbara Sztokfisz Cyberdiplomacy – a Tool for Building Digital Peace introduCTION ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 7 Robert Siudak New Entities in a Multilateral Cyber World Izabela Albrycht OPENING REMARKS ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 10 The Power of Digital Data Przemysław Roguski, PhD International competition IN The digital age ������������������������������������������ 13 The Geopolitics of Cloud Computing Paweł Kostkiewicz, Maciej Siciarek, Krzysztof Silicki, Magdalena Wrzosek, PhD digital technologies AS AN ELEMENT of power ������������������������������������������ 27 Certification and Standardisation in the Context of Digital Sovereignty Tomasz Dylik Cyberdiplomacy – a tool for BuILDING digital peace ����������������������������� 41 Geopolitics of Digital Belts and Roads Teodor Buchner, PhD NEW ENTITIES
    [Show full text]
  • German Arms Exports to the World? Taking Stock of the Past 30 Years
    7/2020 PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE FRANKFURT / LEIBNIZ-INSTITUT HESSISCHE STIFTUNG FRIEDENS- UND KONFLIKTFORSCHUNG SIMONE WISOTZKI // GERMAN ARMS EXPORTS TO THE WORLD? TAKING STOCK OF THE PAST 30 YEARS PRIF Report 7/2020 GERMAN ARMS EXPORTS TO THE WORLD? TAKING STOCK OF THE PAST 30 YEARS SIMONE WISOTZKI // ImprInt LEIBNIZ-INSTITUT HESSISCHE STIFTUNG FRIEDENS- UND KONFLIKTFORSCHUNG (HSFK) PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE FRANKFURT (PRIF) Translation: Team Paraphrasis Cover: Leopard 2 A7 by Krauss-Maffei Wegmann (KMW), October 29, 2019. © picture alliance / Ralph Zwilling - Tank-Masters.de | Ralph Zwilling Text license: Creative Commons CC-BY-ND (Attribution/NoDerivatives/4.0 International). The images used are subject to their own licenses. Correspondence to: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt Baseler Straße 27–31 D-60329 Frankfurt am Main Telephone: +49 69 95 91 04-0 E-Mail: [email protected] https://www.prif.org ISBN: 978-3-946459-62-0 Summary The German government claims to pursue a restrictive arms export policy. Indeed, there are ample laws, provisions and international agreements for regulating German arms export policy. However, a review of 30 years of German arms export policy reveals an alarming picture. Although licences granted for arms exports to so-called third countries, which are neither part of the EU or NATO, nor equivalent states (Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and Switzerland), are supposed to be isolated cas- es with specific justifications, they have become the rule. In the past ten years alone, up to 60 per cent of German weapons of war and other military equipment has repeatedly been exported to third coun- tries. Not every arms export to third countries is problematic.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis International Relations - European Union Studies
    A FRONT ROW MULTILATERALIST On German parliamentary justifications for a more assertive defence policy Master thesis International Relations - European Union Studies By Jonathan Provoost - s1446185 Supervisor: Dr. M.E.L. David 3 July 2020 Word count: 16136 List of parliamentarians Tobias Pflüger (The Left) Nils Annen (SPD) Eckhard Pols (CDU) Franziska Brandtner (The Greens) Achim Post (SPD) Daniela De Ridder (SPD) Norbert Röttgen (CDU) Marcus Faber (CDU) Karin Stenz (CDU) Fritz Felgentreu (SPD) Thorsten Frei (CDU) List of abbreviations Ingo Gädechens (CDU) AfD Alternative for Germany Wolfgang Gehrcke (The Left) CDU Christian Democratic Union Florian Hahn (CSU) CSU Christian Social Union Heike Hänsel (The Left) CSDP Common Security and Defence Policy Jürgen Hardt (CDU) EDF European Defence Fund Mark Hauptmann (CDU) EEAS European Union External Action Service Martin Hebner (AfD) eFP Enhanced Forward Presence Wolfgang Hellmich (SPD) ESDP European Security and Defence Policy Thomas Hitschler (SPD) EU European Union Alois Karl (CSU) EUGS European Union Global Strategy Roderick Kiesewetter (CDU) FDP Free Democratic Party Günther Krichbaum (CDU) GDR German Democratic Republic Alexander Graf Lambsdorff (FDP) FRG Federal Republic of Germany Karl Lamers (CDU) NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization Stefan Liebich (The Left) PESCO Permanent Structured Cooperation on Defence Wilfried Lorenz (CDU) QCA Qualitative Content Analysis Rüdiger Lucassen (AfD) SDP Social Democratic Party Elisabeth Motschmann (CDU) US United States (of America) Alexander Neu
    [Show full text]