DOCSLIB.ORG

Space-2014-Final-Program.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

4–7 AUGUST 2014 SAN DIEGO, CA CONNECTING, PROTECTING, AND ENHANCING A GLOBAL SOCIETY FINAL PROGRAM www.aiaa-space.org #aiaaSpace 14-365 Executive Steering Committee AIAA SPACE 2014 Welcome The members of the Executive Steering Committee welcome you to the AIAA Space and Astronautics Forum and Exposition (SPACE 2014) with great excitement. This year’s event comes at a time when the political and economic landscape is little changed from last year: budgets are still tight, political support for our endeavors still wanes, and James H. Crocker Lt Gen (Ret) Larry conflicting visions for the future of space are evolving from all corners. But, against this Lockheed Martin D. James unsettled backdrop, we see new players emerging, new business models evolving, and a Space Systems NASA Jet Propulsion new commitment to furthering exploration of space growing. It is with these factors in Laboratory mind that we have developed the program for AIAA SPACE 2014. By participating in AIAA SPACE 2014, you will engage with leaders from government, industry and academia, discussing the global and national outlook for human space exploration, commercial opportunities, space science, research, and technology, and the utilization of space for transportation, security, and weather monitoring. These critical discussions will underpin our theme of “Connecting, Gregory Jones David King Protecting, and Enhancing a Global Society,” examining each element through Orbital Sciences Dynetics, Inc. the factors that drive every successful space mission: Leadership, Innovation, and Technology. You will find those plenary themes integrated into our panel and technical sessions, allowing deeper dives into all aspects of space exploration, including operations, robotics and architectures, systems and engineering, and much, much more. This year’s event gives you the knowledge of the most current and cutting-edge space technologies as well as the contacts needed for future collaboration and partnerships. William A. Klanke Jeffrey J. Thank you for making the choice to attend this year’s event, and for your continued Puschell SpaceNews enthusiasm for space. Let the information and conversations you share this week Raytheon Company spark the ingenuity and collaboration that is so vital for mission success. And, more importantly, let SPACE 2014 remind you how your work fuels the collective human drive to explore and be part of something bigger than ourselves, and how you bring about new technologies that make everyday living better for all of us. Christopher Lt Gen (Ret) Scolese John T. “Tom” NASA Goddard Space Sheridan SPACE 2014 is proud to feature the following conferences: Flight Center The SI Organization, Inc. AIAA SPACE Conference 32nd AIAA International AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Communications Satellite Systems Conference Conference (ICSSC) AIAA Complex Aerospace Systems Exchange (CASE) www.aiaa-space.org 3 #aiaaSpace IntroOrganizing Committee Organizing Committee Complex Aerospace Systems Exchange (CASE) Space Resources and Colonization Executive Chair Leslie Gertsch, Missouri University of Science and Technology Forum General Chair Michael Ryschkewitsch, The Johns Hopkins Jeffrey Puschell, Raytheon Company University Applied Physics Laboratory David (Larry) Clark, Lockheed Martin Corporation General Chair Forum 360 Program Chair Anita Gale, Aerospace Education Gregory Scott, U.S. Naval Research David Dress, NASA Langley Research Center Competitions Laboratory Deputy General Chair Ron Kohl, R.J. Kohl and Associates Tsutsumi S. Bright, The Boeing Company Forum Technical Program Chair Space History, Society, and Policy Antony Williams, Jacobs Engineering Academic Track Co-Chairs Jarret Lafleur, Sandia National Laboratories Education Chair Franz-Josef Kahlen, University of Cape Town Cam Martin, NASA Dryden Flight Research Edgar Bering, University of Houston Shannon Flumerfelt, Oakland University Center James D. Rendleman, USSTRATCOM JFCC International Chair Simulation Session Co-Chairs SPACE David Finkleman, SkySentry, LLC Alison Lauderbach, Boeing Test and Evaluation Space Systems Member Engagement Chair Jim Blohowiak, The Boeing Company Jim Baker, Arrow Science and Technology Jane Hansen, HRP Systems, Inc. Program Track 1 Chair Jeremy Straub, University of North Dakota Local Section Louisa Guise, Raytheon Missile Systems Space Transportation and Launch Systems Kevin Burns, Northrop Grumman Corporation Program Track 2 Chair Clinton Plaisted, a.i. solutions John Rose, The Boeing Company Miroslav Sir, The Aerospace Corporation Public Policy Chair J.R. Edwards, Lockheed Martin Corporation Space Robotics and Space Architecture Steven E. Fredrickson, NASA Johnson Space Social Media Chair Technical Program Committee Center Michelle Bailey, University of Maryland, Jackelynne Silva, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University College Astrodynamics Specialist Alan B. Jenkin, The Aerospace Corporation University Standards Chair (AIAA) Space Systems Engineering and Space Economics Clinton Plaisted, a.i. solutions Marcus J. Holzinger, Georgia Institute of Michelle Bailey, University of Maryland, Young Professional Chair Technology (AAS) University College Sarah Shull, NASA Johnson Communications Systems (ICSSC) Sherry Stukes, NASA Jet Propulsion Space Center Rabindra (Rob) Singh, SSL Laboratory Daniel Nigg, The Aerospace Corporation Astrodynamics Specialist Conference Chairs National Security Space Peter Lai, Globalstar (AIAA) Roberta Ewart, Space and Missile Systems The Aerospace Corporation Representative Robert Melton, Pennsylvania State University Center Laura Speckman, The Aerospace (AAS) Joseph Betser, The Aerospace Corporation Corporation International Communications Satellite Systems Reinventing Space Conference (ICSSC) Chairs Charles Kilmer, AIAA Los Angeles – Las General Chair and Conference Co-Chair Vegas Section Chuck Cynamon, SSL Federal Space and Earth Science Conference Co-Chair and Communications Virendra Sarohia, NASA Jet Propulsion Systems Technical Committee Chair Laboratory F. Ayhan Sakarya, REED Integration, Inc. Space Exploration Colloquium Chair Chris Moore, NASA Headquarters Robert (Bob) Frueholz, The Aerospace Surendra P. Sharma, NASA Ames Research Corporation Center Space Operations & Logistics Shirley Tseng, MorganFranklin Corporation Larry Bryant, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Kandyce E. Goodliff, NASA Langley Research Center www.aiaa-space.org 4 #aiaaSpace IntroContents Welcome 3 Organizing Committee 4 Forum Overview 7 Sponsors and Supporters 10 Plenary Sessions 11 www.twitter.com/aiaa Forum 360 13 www.facebook.com/AIAAfan www.youtube.com/aiaatv Special Events 22 www.linkedin.com/companies/aiaa Networking Events 23 www.flickr.com/aiaaevents Recognition Events 24 www.google.com/+aiaaorg Exposition Hall 27 new.livestream/AIAAvideo/SPACE2014 Exhibitors 29 Join the conversation! General Information 32 #aiaaSpace Author and Session Chair Information 34 Sponsored by: On-Site Wi-Fi Information Network Name: Space2014 Committee Meetings 35 Password: ULAlaunch Sessions at a Glance 37 AIAA is the world’s largest technical society dedicated Session Detail Matrix 42 to the global aerospace profession. With more than 35,000 individual members worldwide, and one hundred corporate members, AIAA brings together Author and Session Chair Index 78 industry, academia, and government to advance engineering and science in aviation, space, and defense. Venue Map 83 www.aiaa.org www.aiaa-space.org 5 #aiaaSpace Get Your Conference Info on the Go! Download the FREE AIAA 2014 Conference Mobile App MY ITINERARY FROM SCHOLARONE Compatible with iPhone/iPad, Android, and BlackBerry! FEATURES HOW TO DOWNLOAD Browse Program Any version can be run without an active Internet connection! You can also sync an itinerary you created online with the app by entering your unique itinerary name. View the program at your fingertips MyItinerary Mobile App MyItinerary Web App My Itinerary For optimal use, we recommend • For optimal use, we recommend: iPhone 3GS, iPod Touch (3rd generation), Create your own conference s iPhone 3GS, iPod Touch (3rd iPad iOS 4.0, or later schedule generation), iPad iOS 4.0, or later Download the MyItinerary app by s Most mobile devices using Android Conference Info searching for “ScholarOne” in the App 2.2 or later with the default browser Store directly from your mobile device. Including special events Or, access the link below or scan the QR s BlackBerry Torch or later device code to access the iTunes page for the app: using BlackBerry OS 7. 0 with the Take Notes http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/scholarone- default browser my-itinerary/id497884329?mt=8 Take notes during sessions • Download the MyItinerary app by Select the meeting “AIA A SPACE 2014” scanning the QR code or accessing City Map http://download.abstractcentral.com/ See the surrounding area and aiaa-msp14/index.htm the Manchester Grand Hyatt • Once downloaded, you can bookmark San Diego the site to access it later or add a link to your home screen. Connect to Twitter Tweet about what you’re doing and who you’re meeting with #aiaaSpace 14-101 IntroForum Overview Plenary Panels Get the big picture on space from the thought leaders in the field during these high-level discussions and presentations. From perspectives on the future of space systems and flight, to the implementation of programs for space-based remote sensing observations and data—you’ll get the latest from elite leaders in the field. Forum 360 These conversations with experts will cover a spectrum of timely topics including programs,
Recommended publications
  • Mr. Jeffrey Manber Testimony.Pdf

    Mr. Jeffrey Manber Testimony.Pdf

    Testimony of Mr. Jeffrey Manber Chief Executive Officer, Nanoracks LLC before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation Subcommittee on Aviation and Space Tuesday, November 5, 2019 Building NASA’s Workforce of the Future: STEM Engagement for a 21st Century Education Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Sinema, and other distinguished members of the Aviation and Space Subcommittee, thank you for giving me the opportunity to return to this room to testify before you. I look forward to discussing how commercial access to the International Space Station has provided an unprecedented educational experience to over a million students across the United States. Let me begin today by explaining that I am here in two different capacities. I am, of course, representing Nanoracks as the CEO, but I am also Chairman of the Board for DreamUp, Nanoracks’ educational sister company. Once just a division in Nanoracks, we spun DreamUp out to be a standalone public benefit corporation because the business of providing educational access to space was, and remains today, strong and important. DreamUp’s sole focus is bringing space to the classroom, and the classroom to space. We opened the doors at Nanoracks in 2009 with the goal to make space accessible to everyone. I am proud to say today that the very first customers that brought Nanoracks into business were in fact, schools. Our very first experiments were small projects that were developed by middle school students. These kids quite literally held bake sales - not to sponsor their soccer team, or raise money for the school dance, but to send their very own science experiment to the International Space Station via a Nanoracks Space Act Agreement with NASA.
  • Former Astronaut Visits Stennis

    Former Astronaut Visits Stennis

    Volume 7 Issue 8 www.nasa.gov/centers/stennis August 2012 Touchdown! Take it both ways – the Mars Science Laboratory rover, Curiosity, touched Sharp at a height of about 3.4 miles, taller than Mount Whitney in California. down on the surface of Mars early on the morning of Aug. 6 CDT, and the The Curiosity team hopes to drive the rover to the mountain to investigate NASA team scored a very big touchdown for space exploration. This image its lower layers, which scientists think hold clues to past environmental taken by Curiosity shows what lies ahead for the rover – its main science change. This image was captured by a rover camera shortly after it landed. target, Mount Sharp. The rover’s shadow can be seen in the foreground, It has been linearized to remove the distorted appearance that results from and the dark bands beyond are dunes. Rising up in the distance is Mount its fisheye lens. For additional coverage and photos, see pages 4-7. Page 2 LAGNIAPPE August 2012 “NASA is in a unique position to excite and inspire students about STEM education, and to help grow our technical workforce.” From the desk of Katie Wallace Director, Office of Education, Stennis Space Center he Mars Science Laboratory’s successful land- and over 8,000 students and parents. Our workshops ing on Mars early Aug. 6 was a huge engi- have a satisfaction rating of 99 percent. Tneering accomplishment! Years of research, planning, collaboration and dedication came down to In addition, we focus on student activities that enrich seven minutes.
  • 120611MS.Pdf

    120611MS.Pdf

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -ミルスペース 120611- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [What’s New in Virtual Library?] McGrawHill AW&ST AVIATION WEEK 1205AeroAme_Cover-ss.jpg 120528AWST_Contents.pdf, Cover.jpg 1204AeroAme_Cover-s.jpg Milbank Space Business Review SJAC 1205_Space Business Review.pdf SJAC1203_Jisedai-Uchu-Project-ni-kansuru-Chosa_Contents.pd NASA KSC SpaceportNews f, Cover.jpg 120601nasa_KSC_SpaceportNews_8pages.pdf, Cover.jpg SJAC1203_CD_Sekai-No-Uchu-Infra-Databook_Cover.jpg NASA MSFC MarshallStar CNES CnesMag 120530MarshallStar_Cover.jpg 1204cnesmag_No.53_Contents.pdf, Cover.jpg 120523MarshallStar_Cover.jpg ISAS ISAS News AIAA Aerospace America 1205ISAS_News_374_14pages.pdf, Cover.jpg 1206AeroAme_Cover-ss.jpg [What’s New in Reaｌ Library?] 重力とは何か、アインシュタインから超弦理論へ、宇宙の謎に迫る、 大栗博司 (幻冬舎新書, 12.05) 収蔵。 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Futron 12.06- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2012 Orbital Launches by Launch Vehicle Family 2012 Orbital Commercial Launches 1 Manufacturer Market Share of Satellites Launched Through May 31, 2012 Selected Satellites with Regulatory Activity During May 2012 Satellite Location Activity NSS-7 20WL THE FCC granted SES‘s request to modify its license in terms of its access to the U.S. market within the FCC's Permitted Space Station List by relocating the C- and Ku-band operations for NSS-7 from 22 WL to 20 WL. DIRECTV 14 99WL DIRECTV applied to launch and operate a Ka-band satellite, DIRECTV 14, to be located at 99 WL. Intelsat 19 194WL The FCC granted Intelsat's request to launch and operate a C-/Ku-band satellite, Intelsat 19, to be located at 194 WL (166 EL). AMC 2 340.8WL SES applied to reassign AMC-2 from 355.02 WL (4.98 EL) to 340.8 WL (19.2 EL) where it will operate pursuant to Luxembourg ITU filings and will be flown in an inverted mode to provide Ku-band coverage in Southern Africa.
  • Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company NASA SBIR Overview

    Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company NASA SBIR Overview

    Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company NASA SBIR Overview and Engagement Craig Owens Program Manager, SBIR Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Space Systems Company Portfolio Special Strategic & Missile Defense Civil Space Programs NASA Human Adv Programs Strategic Missiles Missile Defense Planetary Weather & Exploration Exploration Environment Military Space Mission Solutions Protected Narrowband Navigation Weather Early Space End-to-End Geospatial Comms Comms Warning Protection Mission Systems Technologies Commercial Space Advanced Technology Center Subsidiaries Remote Commercial Wind Energy Optics, RF Adv. Materials Space Sciences Sensing SATCOM Management & Photonics & Nano Systems & Instruments LM SBIR Team Mission 1. Collaborate with small businesses to get advanced technology to our customers 2. Build strategic, long term relationships with small businesses by leveraging Gov’t SBIR/STTR R&D funding 3. Understand what small business technologies are potentially coming to the market 4. Align discriminating small business technologies to LM programs and future opportunities to reduce cost and win new business 5. Complement our small business supply chain and support the Gov’t initiative to leverage small businesses © 2016 Lockheed Martin Corporation, All Rights Reserved LM SBIR Engagement • Strong engagement in the SBIR/STTR Program – Seeking technology maturation supporting program needs – 5-10 year outlook – TRL 6 needed for potential LM investment – Expect small businesses to be informed on LM • Benefits to LM – Innovation & Affordability – Strategic partnerships – Complements LM investments – Help drive innovation into next generation systems © 2016 Lockheed Martin Corporation, All Rights Reserved LMSSC Endorsement Process • LM SME’s assess all concepts • Leadership aware of engagements • Process allows for relationship building © 2016 Lockheed Martin Corporation, All Rights Reserved 5 6.
  • Lockheed Martin Space Advanced Programs

    Lockheed Martin Space Advanced Programs

    Lockheed Martin Space Advanced Programs Requirements in NASA Science Missions © 2019 Lockheed Martin. All Rights Reserved Performance and Operational Measurement Requirements Emitted radiance Detect photons; Convert to e- Calibrate Data Science Data Quantized Photons Electrons Science Data Radiances § Orbit § Wavelength band § Detection § Science question § Signal photons § Integration time § Navigation analysis § Background scene § Quantum efficiency § Radiometric calibration § Field of View § Dark current § Resolution § Read noise § Solar intrusion Mission Requirements Performance Requirements • Duration • Environment • Electrical • Mechanical Iterate • Reliability • Operational • Thermal • Structural Evolve Requirements Constraints Resource Requirements • Spacecraft • Mass • Thermal interface • Power • Data rate • Launch vehicle • Size • Alignment Concept Design 2 Example Requirements Tree Implementing NASA Level 1s Institution/NASA Center Level 1 Reqts Program Level 2 Launch Environmental Mission Assurance Mission Reqts Doc Project Vehicle IRD Reqts Requirements (MAR) Flight System Level 3 Mission Ops & Element- Payload Spacecraft Flight to Ground Payload Reqts to SC ICDs Ground Developed, Requirements Doc ICD System Reqts Project Approved Payload/ Level 4 Spacecraft Ground Instrument Testbeds Element-Controlled Subsystems Subsystems Subsystems 3 Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) v Objective: Characterize Mars’ atmospheric escape v PI: Dr. Bruce Jakosky, CU LASP v Implementing Institution: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center v Spacecraft and Mission Ops: Lockheed Martin v Instruments: UCB SSL, CU/LASP, NASA GSFC, CNES v Mars relay: Jet Propulsion Laboratory v Launched November 18th 2013 v MOI September 22nd 2014 v Currently in third mission extension Image Credit: NASA/B. Ingalls 5 Science Missions Across the Solar System 6 © 2019 Lockheed Martin. All Rights Reserved.
  • International Docking System Standard (IDSS) Interface Definition Document (IDD)

    International Docking System Standard (IDSS) Interface Definition Document (IDD)

    IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 International Docking System Standard (IDSS) Interface Definition Document (IDD) Revision E October 2016 IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 This page intentionally left blank. IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 REVISION AND HISTORY REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE - Initial Release 09-21-10 A Revised, rearranged, and added text to nearly all sections of 05-13-11 document. Revised & renumbered figures. Added requirements on mechanical soft capture, soft capture sensors, HCS seals, hook stiffness, separation system, electrical bonding, environments, and materials. Added Docking Performance section, and Appendix A. B Document Hard Capture System parameter values, figure updates, 11-15-12 separation system force addition, editorial correction and updates. C Document the narrow ring Soft Capture System (SCS) geometric 11-20-13 parameters and update applicable figures. Added Appendix B on Magnetic Soft Capture. D Revision D is the first version of the document under NASA 08-04-15 configuration control and released by NASA ERU. Revision D includes the following DCNs: DCN 001 DCN 002 DCN 003 DCN 004C DCN 005 DCN 006 DCN 007 DCN 008A DCN 009B DCN 010 DCN 011 DCN 012 DCN 013 E Revision E includes the following DCNs: XX-XX-XX DCN 014 DCN 015A DCN 017 DCN 018 DCN 020 DCN 021 IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 REVISION AND HISTORY REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE DCN 022 DCN 023 DCN 024 DCN 025 DCN 027A DCN 029 DCN 032 DCN 033 DCN 037 DCN 038 DCN 039 IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 This page intentionally left blank.
  • Co-Creating and Directing Innovation Ecosystems? Nasas Changing Approach to Public-Private Partnerships in Low-Earth Orbit Mariana Mazzucato1,2 and Douglas K.R

    Co-Creating and Directing Innovation Ecosystems? Nasas Changing Approach to Public-Private Partnerships in Low-Earth Orbit Mariana Mazzucato1,2 and Douglas K.R

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UCL Discovery Co-creating and directing Innovation Ecosystems? NASAs changing approach to public-private partnerships in low-earth orbit Mariana Mazzucato1,2 and Douglas K.R. Robinson 1,3 * 1 Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, University College London, UK 2 Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex, UK 3 Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Sciences Innovations Sociétés (LISIS), CNRS-INRA-ESIEE- UPEM, Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, France * Corresponding author : [email protected] Abstract A recent report from NASA’s office of the chief technologist positions a self-sustained “low-earth-orbit ecosystem” as a desirable objective for NASA’s human spaceflight policy and linking to its larger aims of deeper exploration of the solar system. The report follows a wave of mission shifts and space policy directives which emphasize that the private sector should be given more power and receive public agency financial support to stimulate space services. To understand how US space innovation activities are changing, and to be able to make assessments and policy recommendations, we use an innovation ecosystems approach to help understand the types of relationships between actors in low-earth-orbit and to determine the ramifications for US space policy. Our findings reveal four new forms of relationships between NASAA and other parties in the emerging innovation ecosystem and we discuss how these lead to policy challenges for NASA as a mission-oriented public agency with the new additional objective of creating an economic zone in orbit. 1. Introduction Historically, NASA’s mission-oriented programs for innovation have been driven by security concerns and by the need for maintaining technical leadership over other nations.
  • View NASA As Adrift

    View NASA As Adrift

    A SpacePolicyOnline.Com Hearing Summary Confirmation of Charles Bolden and Lori Garver to be Administrator and Deputy Administrator of NASA Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee July 8, 2009 Chair: Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) Ranking Member: Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) Witnesses Maj. Gen. Charles Bolden (USMC, Ret.), nominee for Administrator (prepared statement) Ms. Lori Garver, nominee for Deputy Administrator (prepared statement) Background NASA has had an Acting Administrator, Christopher Scolese, since the resignation of Michael Griffin on January 20, 2009 with the change in administrations. The Deputy Administrator position has been vacant since January also, when Shana Dale resigned. Gen. Bolden and Ms. Garver were nominated by President Obama to be Administrator and Deputy Administrator on May 23, 2009. Gen. Bolden is a former NASA astronaut who flew on a space shuttle mission with now-Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) who was a congressman from Florida at the time. Ms. Garver has a broad background in space – from representing grass roots space enthusiasts as executive director of the National Space Society, to serving at NASA at Associate Administrator for Policy during the tenure of Administrator Dan Goldin, to representing private sector space efforts as a consultant for the past eight years. She competed with singer Lance Bass to become a “space tourist” on a Russian Soyuz spacecraft in the early 2000’s, but neither was able to raise the requisite funding. She was a key adviser to the Hillary Clinton campaign on space issues, and moved to the Obama campaign after he won the Democratic nomination. A webcast of the hearing is available here.
  • The International Space Station

    The International Space Station

    The International Space Station Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board April 2015 Sam Scimemi Director, International Space Station NASA Headquarters NASA’s and America’s goals onboard the Station Enable long duration human spaceflight beyond LEO Enable a commercial market in LEO Advance benefits to humanity through research Basis for international HSF exploration partnerships 2 Where we are Today In January 2014 the Administration extended the life of ISS at least to 2024 Each International Partner is working within their own policy framework to determine ISS future beyond 2020 Begun 1 year crew expedition and associated long duration human performance research Together with CASIS, NASA is expanding the commercial demand for micro-gravity research and LEO access ISS has become an important space and earth science platform expanding our knowledge of our home planet and the universe Commercial transportation development and operations for ISS is having a significant influence on the aerospace industry; considering the next commercial activity in LEO 3 3 4/ 4 4 The Future of Human Space Exploration NASA’s Building Blocks to Mars Expanding capabilities at an asteroid redirected to lunar orbit Exploring Mars and other deep U.S. companies space provide destinations affordable access to low Earth orbit Learning the fundamentals aboard the Traveling beyond low Earth International orbit with the Space Launch Space Station System rocket and Orion crew capsule Missions: 6 to 12 months Missions: 1 month up to 12 months Missions: 2 to 3 years Return:
  • Nasa's Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Request Hearing

    Nasa's Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Request Hearing

    NASA’S FISCAL YEAR 2010 BUDGET REQUEST HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MAY 19, 2009 Serial No. 111–28 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 49–551PDF WASHINGTON : 2009 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 15:34 Dec 19, 2009 Jkt 049551 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DWORK\FULL09\051909\49551 SCIENCE1 PsN: SCIENCE1 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HON. BART GORDON, Tennessee, Chairman JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois RALPH M. HALL, Texas EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER JR., LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California Wisconsin DAVID WU, Oregon LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas BRIAN BAIRD, Washington DANA ROHRABACHER, California BRAD MILLER, North Carolina ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois VERNON J. EHLERS, Michigan GABRIELLE GIFFORDS, Arizona FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma DONNA F. EDWARDS, Maryland JUDY BIGGERT, Illinois MARCIA L. FUDGE, Ohio W. TODD AKIN, Missouri BEN R. LUJA´ N, New Mexico RANDY NEUGEBAUER, Texas PAUL D. TONKO, New York BOB INGLIS, South Carolina PARKER GRIFFITH, Alabama MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey MARIO DIAZ-BALART, Florida JIM MATHESON, Utah BRIAN P. BILBRAY, California LINCOLN DAVIS, Tennessee ADRIAN SMITH, Nebraska BEN CHANDLER, Kentucky PAUL C.
  • Space Policy Directive 1 New Shepard Flies Again 5

    Space Policy Directive 1 New Shepard Flies Again 5

    BUSINESS | POLITICS | PERSPECTIVE DECEMBER 18, 2017 INSIDE ■ Space Policy Directive 1 ■ New Shepard fl ies again ■ 5 bold predictions for 2018 VISIT SPACENEWS.COM FOR THE LATEST IN SPACE NEWS INNOVATION THROUGH INSIGNT CONTENTS 12.18.17 DEPARTMENTS 3 QUICK TAKES 6 NEWS Blue Origin’s New Shepard flies again Trump establishes lunar landing goal 22 COMMENTARY John Casani An argument for space fission reactors 24 ON NATIONAL SECURITY Clouds of uncertainty over miltary space programs 26 COMMENTARY Rep. Brian Babin and Rep. Ami Ber We agree, Mr. President,. America should FEATURE return to the moon 27 COMMENTARY Rebecca Cowen- 9 Hirsch We honor the 10 Paving a clear “Path” to winners of the first interoperable SATCOM annual SpaceNews awards. 32 FOUST FORWARD Third time’s the charm? SpaceNews will not publish an issue Jan. 1. Our next issue will be Jan. 15. Visit SpaceNews.com, follow us on Twitter and sign up for our newsletters at SpaceNews.com/newsletters. ON THE COVER: SPACENEWS ILLUSTRATION THIS PAGE: SPACENEWS ILLUSTRATION FOLLOW US @SpaceNews_Inc Fb.com/SpaceNewslnc youtube.com/user/SpaceNewsInc linkedin.com/company/spacenews SPACENEWS.COM | 1 VOLUME 28 | ISSUE 25 | $4.95 $7.50 NONU.S. CHAIRMAN EDITORIAL CORRESPONDENTS ADVERTISING SUBSCRIBER SERVICES Felix H. Magowan EDITORINCHIEF SILICON VALLEY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TOLL FREE IN U.S. [email protected] Brian Berger Debra Werner Paige McCullough Tel: +1-866-429-2199 Tel: +1-303-443-4360 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Fax: +1-845-267-3478 +1-571-356-9624 Tel: +1-571-278-4090 CEO LONDON OUTSIDE U.S.
  • Csa 2020-21 Dp

    Csa 2020-21 Dp

    Canadian Space Agency 2020–21 Departmental Plan The Honourable Navdeep Bains, P.C., M.P. Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Industry, 2020 Catalogue Number: ST96-10E-PDF ISSN: 2371-7777 Table of Contents From the Minister ............................................................................. 1 Plans at a glance .............................................................................. 3 Core responsibilities: planned results and resources ............................. 5 Canada in Space ........................................................................ 5 Internal Services: planned results .................................................... 15 Spending and human resources ........................................................ 17 Planned spending ..................................................................... 17 Planned human resources.......................................................... 19 Estimates by vote ..................................................................... 19 Condensed future-oriented statement of operations ...................... 20 Corporate information ..................................................................... 23 Organizational profile ................................................................ 23 Raison d’être, mandate and role: who we are and what we do ....... 23 Operating context .................................................................... 23 Reporting framework ...............................................................