DOCSLIB.ORG

Gao-21-306, Nasa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gao-21-306, Nasa United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees May 2021 NASA Assessments of Major Projects GAO-21-306 May 2021 NASA Assessments of Major Projects Highlights of GAO-21-306, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found This report provides a snapshot of how The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) portfolio of major well NASA is planning and executing projects in the development stage of the acquisition process continues to its major projects, which are those with experience cost increases and schedule delays. This marks the fifth year in a row costs of over $250 million. NASA plans that cumulative cost and schedule performance deteriorated (see figure). The to invest at least $69 billion in its major cumulative cost growth is currently $9.6 billion, driven by nine projects; however, projects to continue exploring Earth $7.1 billion of this cost growth stems from two projects—the James Webb Space and the solar system. Telescope and the Space Launch System. These two projects account for about Congressional conferees included a half of the cumulative schedule delays. The portfolio also continues to grow, with provision for GAO to prepare status more projects expected to reach development in the next year. reports on selected large-scale NASA programs, projects, and activities. This Cumulative Cost and Schedule Performance for NASA’s Major Projects in Development is GAO’s 13th annual assessment. This report assesses (1) the cost and schedule performance of NASA’s major projects, including the effects of COVID-19; and (2) the development and maturity of technologies and progress in achieving design stability. The report also includes assessments of 33 major projects. To conduct its review, GAO collected questionnaire data; analyzed cost, schedule, technology maturity, and other data; reviewed project status reports; and interviewed NASA officials. The reviewed projects include those in formulation, which takes a project through preliminary design, and The majority of projects are managing the effects of the pandemic by using cost those in development, which includes and schedule reserves—extra money or time set aside to accommodate building and launching the system. unforeseen risks or delays. However, the full effects of COVID-19 are not yet known, and these reserves may be insufficient for several projects. What GAO Recommends Most projects met a GAO best practice related to technology maturity, but few In prior work, GAO has made multiple met a best practice to demonstrate a stable design. recommendations to improve NASA’s acquisition of major projects. NASA • Most projects that held a preliminary design review demonstrated that the generally agreed with those project’s critical technologies—new or novel technologies needed to meet recommendations and implemented requirements—were mature. By doing so, the projects demonstrated the changes in response to many. technologies can perform as needed under realistic conditions before However, NASA has not fully committing to use them in the system. addressed 21 recommendations as of • Most projects that held a critical design review fell short of meeting the best March 2021. practice of releasing 90 percent of design drawings at that review. The average was approximately 70 percent. Design stability is important because late design changes can lead to costly rework and delays. NASA and GAO have taken steps to identify and assess metrics that contribute View GAO-21-306. For more information, to project success. For example, GAO is conducting work to determine if there contact W. William Russell at (202) 512-4841 are updated best practices for product development. In the interim, GAO or [email protected]. continues to believe design drawings are a useful indicator of design stability. United States Government Accountability Office Contents Letter 1 Background 3 Continued Cost Increases and Schedule Delays Will Likely Be Exacerbated by COVID-19 While Portfolio Grows 11 Most Projects Demonstrate Technology Maturity but Continue to Have Challenges with Design Stability 23 Project Assessments 32 Assessments of Artemis Major Projects in the Formulation Phase 35 Infographic of Major NASA Projects and Programs Supporting Artemis Missions 37 Gateway Program Summary 39 Gateway – Deep Space Logistics (DSL) 41 Gateway – Exploration Extravehicular Activity (xEVA) 43 Gateway – Habitation and Logistics Outpost (HALO) 45 Gateway – Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) 47 Human Landing System (HLS) 49 Mobile Launcher 2 (ML2) 51 Space Launch System Block 1B (SLS Block 1B) 53 Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover (VIPER) 55 Assessments of Artemis Major Projects in the Implementation Phase 57 Exploration Ground Systems (EGS) 59 Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (Orion) and Docking System 61 Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) 65 Space Launch System (SLS) 67 Assessments of Other NASA Major Projects in the Formulation Phase 69 Dragonfly 71 Electrified Powertrain Flight Demonstration (EPFD) 73 Interstellar Mapping and Acceleration Probe (IMAP) 75 Near Earth Object Surveyor (NEO Surveyor) 77 Polarimeter to Unify the Corona and Heliosphere (PUNCH) 79 Assessments of Other NASA Major Projects in the Implementation Phase 81 Commercial Crew Program (CCP) 83 Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) 85 Europa Clipper 87 James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) 89 Landsat 9 (L9) 91 Laser Communications Relay Demonstration (LCRD) 93 Low Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD) 95 Lucy 97 Page i GAO-21-306 Assessments of Major NASA Projects Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope (Roman) 99 NASA ISRO – Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) 101 On-Orbit Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing 1 (OSAM-1) 103 Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem (PACE) 105 Psyche 107 Space Network Ground Segment Sustainment (SGSS) 109 Spectro-Photometer for the History of the Universe, Epoch of Re-ionization and Ices Explorer (SPHEREx) 111 Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) 113 Agency Comments 115 Appendix I Objectives, Scope, and Methodology 117 Appendix II Estimated Costs and Launch Dates for Major NASA Projects Assessed in GAO’s 2021 Report 124 Appendix III List of Major NASA Projects Included in GAO’s Annual Assessments from 2009 to 2020 127 Appendix IV Technology Readiness Levels 129 Appendix V Comments from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 131 Appendix VI GAO Contacts and Staff Acknowledgments 135 Related GAO Products 136 Tables Table 1: Characteristics of Program Replans and Rebaselines 5 Page ii GAO-21-306 Assessments of Major NASA Projects Table 2: Cumulative Cost and Schedule Performance of NASA’s Major Projects Currently in Development 13 Table 3: Cost and Schedule Changes for NASA’s Major Projects in Development since GAO’s 2020 Assessment 15 Table 4: Anticipated Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Effects on Cost and Schedule Performance for NASA’s Major Projects in Development Based on January 2021 Project Reporting 20 Table 5: Cost and Schedule of Major NASA Projects in Formulation in GAO’s 2021 Report 124 Table 6: Cost and Schedule of Major NASA Projects in Implementation in GAO’s 2021 Report 125 Table 7: NASA Hardware Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) 129 Table 8: NASA Software Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) 129 Figures Figure 1: NASA’s Life Cycle for Space Flight Projects 4 Figure 2: Major NASA Projects Reviewed in GAO’s 2021 Assessment 8 Figure 3: Cumulative Cost and Schedule Performance for NASA’s Major Projects in Development 12 Figure 4: Number of NASA’s Major Projects Meeting GAO’s Best Practice of Achieving a Technology Readiness Level 6 by Preliminary Design Review as of Early 2021 26 Figure 5: NASA’s Major Projects Performance against Best Practice for Design Stability 29 Figure 6: Average Percentage of Engineering Drawing Growth after Critical Design Review among NASA’s Major Projects from 2010 to 2021 31 Figure 7: Illustration of a Sample Project Assessment 34 Figure 8: Major NASA Projects Reviewed in GAO’s Annual Assessments from 2009 to 2020 128 Page iii GAO-21-306 Assessments of Major NASA Projects Abbreviations AEPS Advanced Electric Propulsion System AO announcement of opportunity ATLO assembly, test, and launch operations CCP Commercial Crew Program CDR critical design review CGI Coronagraph Instrument CLPS Commercial Lunar Payload Services CNES Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales COVID-19 Coronavirus Disease 2019 DAA Deployable Antenna Assembly DART Double Asteroid Redirection Test DRACO Didymos Reconnaissance and Asteroid Camera for OpNav Page iv GAO-21-306 Assessments of Major NASA Projects DrACO Drill for Acquisition of Complex Organics DraMS Dragonfly Mass Spectrometer DSL Deep Space Logistics EGS Exploration Ground Systems EIS Europa Imaging System EPFD Electrified Powertrain Flight Demonstration ESA European Space Agency ESM European Service Module ESPRIT-RM European System Providing Refueling, Infrastructure, and Telecommunications Refueler Module EUS Exploration Upper Stage GERS Gateway External Robotic System GRNS Gamma Ray and Neutron Spectrometer GSLV Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle HALO Habitation and Logistics Outpost HLS Human Landing System i-Hab International Habitat I&T integration and test ICON Ionospheric Connection Explorer ICPS Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage IMAP Interstellar Mapping and Acceleration Probe IOC initial operations capability ISRO Indian Space Research Organisation ISS International Space Station JAXA Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency JCL joint cost and schedule confidence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model For
    A QUANTITATIVE HUMAN SPACECRAFT DESIGN EVALUATION MODEL FOR ASSESSING CREW ACCOMMODATION AND UTILIZATION by CHRISTINE FANCHIANG B.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007 M.S., University of Colorado Boulder, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences 2017 i This thesis entitled: A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization written by Christine Fanchiang has been approved for the Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Dr. David M. Klaus Dr. Jessica J. Marquez Dr. Nisar R. Ahmed Dr. Daniel J. Szafir Dr. Jennifer A. Mindock Dr. James A. Nabity Date: 13 March 2017 The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. ii Fanchiang, Christine (Ph.D., Aerospace Engineering Sciences) A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization Thesis directed by Professor David M. Klaus Crew performance, including both accommodation and utilization factors, is an integral part of every human spaceflight mission from commercial space tourism, to the demanding journey to Mars and beyond. Spacecraft were historically built by engineers and technologists trying to adapt the vehicle into cutting edge rocketry with the assumption that the astronauts could be trained and will adapt to the design. By and large, that is still the current state of the art. It is recognized, however, that poor human-machine design integration can lead to catastrophic and deadly mishaps.
    [Show full text]
  • 120611MS.Pdf
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -ミルスペース 120611- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [What’s New in Virtual Library?] McGrawHill AW&ST AVIATION WEEK 1205AeroAme_Cover-ss.jpg 120528AWST_Contents.pdf, Cover.jpg 1204AeroAme_Cover-s.jpg Milbank Space Business Review SJAC 1205_Space Business Review.pdf SJAC1203_Jisedai-Uchu-Project-ni-kansuru-Chosa_Contents.pd NASA KSC SpaceportNews f, Cover.jpg 120601nasa_KSC_SpaceportNews_8pages.pdf, Cover.jpg SJAC1203_CD_Sekai-No-Uchu-Infra-Databook_Cover.jpg NASA MSFC MarshallStar CNES CnesMag 120530MarshallStar_Cover.jpg 1204cnesmag_No.53_Contents.pdf, Cover.jpg 120523MarshallStar_Cover.jpg ISAS ISAS News AIAA Aerospace America 1205ISAS_News_374_14pages.pdf, Cover.jpg 1206AeroAme_Cover-ss.jpg [What’s New in Reaｌ Library?] 重力とは何か、アインシュタインから超弦理論へ、宇宙の謎に迫る、 大栗博司 (幻冬舎新書, 12.05) 収蔵。 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Futron 12.06- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2012 Orbital Launches by Launch Vehicle Family 2012 Orbital Commercial Launches 1 Manufacturer Market Share of Satellites Launched Through May 31, 2012 Selected Satellites with Regulatory Activity During May 2012 Satellite Location Activity NSS-7 20WL THE FCC granted SES‘s request to modify its license in terms of its access to the U.S. market within the FCC's Permitted Space Station List by relocating the C- and Ku-band operations for NSS-7 from 22 WL to 20 WL. DIRECTV 14 99WL DIRECTV applied to launch and operate a Ka-band satellite, DIRECTV 14, to be located at 99 WL. Intelsat 19 194WL The FCC granted Intelsat's request to launch and operate a C-/Ku-band satellite, Intelsat 19, to be located at 194 WL (166 EL). AMC 2 340.8WL SES applied to reassign AMC-2 from 355.02 WL (4.98 EL) to 340.8 WL (19.2 EL) where it will operate pursuant to Luxembourg ITU filings and will be flown in an inverted mode to provide Ku-band coverage in Southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Science Division Status Report
    Planetary Science Division Status Report Jim Green NASA, Planetary Science Division January 26, 2017 Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory CommiBee Outline • Planetary Science ObjecFves • Missions and Events Overview • Flight Programs: – Discovery – New FronFers – Mars Programs – Outer Planets • Planetary Defense AcFviFes • R&A Overview • Educaon and Outreach AcFviFes • PSD Budget Overview New Horizons exploresPlanetary Science Pluto and the Kuiper Belt Ascertain the content, origin, and evoluFon of the Solar System and the potenFal for life elsewhere! 01/08/2016 As the highest resolution images continue to beam back from New Horizons, the mission is onto exploring Kuiper Belt Objects with the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) camera from unique viewing angles not visible from Earth. New Horizons is also beginning maneuvers to be able to swing close by a Kuiper Belt Object in the next year. Giant IcebergsObjecve 1.5.1 (water blocks) floatingObjecve 1.5.2 in glaciers of Objecve 1.5.3 Objecve 1.5.4 Objecve 1.5.5 hydrogen, mDemonstrate ethane, and other frozenDemonstrate progress gasses on the Demonstrate Sublimation pitsDemonstrate from the surface ofDemonstrate progress Pluto, potentially surface of Pluto.progress in in exploring and progress in showing a geologicallyprogress in improving active surface.in idenFfying and advancing the observing the objects exploring and understanding of the characterizing objects The Newunderstanding of Horizons missionin the Solar System to and the finding locaons origin and evoluFon in the Solar System explorationhow the chemical of Pluto wereunderstand how they voted the where life could of life on Earth to that pose threats to and physical formed and evolve have existed or guide the search for Earth or offer People’sprocesses in the Choice for Breakthrough of thecould exist today life elsewhere resources for human Year forSolar System 2015 by Science Magazine as exploraon operate, interact well as theand evolve top story of 2015 by Discover Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta II Icesat-2 Mission Booklet
    A United Launch Alliance (ULA) Delta II 7420-10 photon-counting laser altimeter that advances MISSION rocket will deliver the Ice, Cloud and land Eleva- technology from the first ICESat mission tion Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) spacecraft to a 250 nmi launched on a Delta II in 2003 and operated until (463 km), near-circular polar orbit. Liftoff will 2009. Our planet’s frozen and icy areas, called occur from Space Launch Complex-2 at Vanden- the cryosphere, are a key focus of NASA’s Earth berg Air Force Base, California. science research. ICESat-2 will help scientists MISSION investigate why, and how much, our cryosphere ICESat-2, with its single instrument, the is changing in a warming climate, while also Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System measuring heights across Earth’s temperate OVERVIEW (ATLAS), will provide scientists with height and tropical regions and take stock of the vege- measurements to create a global portrait of tation in forests worldwide. The ICESat-2 mission Earth’s third dimension, gathering data that can is implemented by NASA’s Goddard Space Flight precisely track changes of terrain including Center (GSFC). Northrop Grumman built the glaciers, sea ice, forests and more. ATLAS is a spacecraft. NASA’s Launch Services Program at Kennedy Space Center is responsible for launch management. In addition to ICESat-2, this mission includes four CubeSats which will launch from dispens- ers mounted to the Delta II second stage. The CubeSats were designed and built by UCLA, University of Central Florida, and Cal Poly. The miniaturized satellites will conduct research DELTA II For nearly 30 years, the reliable in space weather, changing electric potential Delta II rocket has been an industry and resulting discharge events on spacecraft workhorse, launching critical and damping behavior of tungsten powder in a capabilities for NASA, the Air Force Image Credit NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center zero-gravity environment.
    [Show full text]
  • International Docking System Standard (IDSS) Interface Definition Document (IDD)
    IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 International Docking System Standard (IDSS) Interface Definition Document (IDD) Revision E October 2016 IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 This page intentionally left blank. IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 REVISION AND HISTORY REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE - Initial Release 09-21-10 A Revised, rearranged, and added text to nearly all sections of 05-13-11 document. Revised & renumbered figures. Added requirements on mechanical soft capture, soft capture sensors, HCS seals, hook stiffness, separation system, electrical bonding, environments, and materials. Added Docking Performance section, and Appendix A. B Document Hard Capture System parameter values, figure updates, 11-15-12 separation system force addition, editorial correction and updates. C Document the narrow ring Soft Capture System (SCS) geometric 11-20-13 parameters and update applicable figures. Added Appendix B on Magnetic Soft Capture. D Revision D is the first version of the document under NASA 08-04-15 configuration control and released by NASA ERU. Revision D includes the following DCNs: DCN 001 DCN 002 DCN 003 DCN 004C DCN 005 DCN 006 DCN 007 DCN 008A DCN 009B DCN 010 DCN 011 DCN 012 DCN 013 E Revision E includes the following DCNs: XX-XX-XX DCN 014 DCN 015A DCN 017 DCN 018 DCN 020 DCN 021 IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 REVISION AND HISTORY REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE DCN 022 DCN 023 DCN 024 DCN 025 DCN 027A DCN 029 DCN 032 DCN 033 DCN 037 DCN 038 DCN 039 IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 This page intentionally left blank.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstellar Extinction in Orion. Variation of the Strength of the UV
    MNRAS 000, 1–9 (2017) Preprint 9 July 2018 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Interstellar extinction in Orion. Variation of the strength of the UV bump across the complex. Leire Beitia-Antero,1⋆ Ana I. G´omez de Castro,1† 1AEGORA Research Group, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de CC. Matem´aticas, Plaza de Ciencias 3, E-28040 Madrid Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ ABSTRACT There is growing observational evidence of dust coagulation in the dense filaments within molecular clouds. Infrared observations show that the dust grains size distri- bution gets shallower and the relative fraction of small to large dust grains decreases as the local density increases. Ultraviolet (UV) observations show that the strength of the 2175 A˚ feature, the so-called UV bump, also decreases with cloud density. In this work, we apply the technique developed for the Taurus study to the Orion molecular cloud and confirm that the UV bump decreases over the densest cores of the cloud as well as in the heavily UV irradiated λ Orionis shell. The study has been extended to the Rosette cloud with uncertain results given the distance (1.3 kpc). Key words: ISM: dust, extinction 1 INTRODUCTION feature of the extinction curve, the so-called UV bump. The UV bump is, by far, the strongest spectral feature in the ex- The Interstellar Medium (ISM) is a complex ensemble of tinction curve but its source remains uncertain (see e.g. the gas, large molecules and dust coupled through the action of review by Draine (2003)).
    [Show full text]
  • Cassiopeia a January2008
    CASSIOPEIA A JANUARY2008 Cassiopeia A is the youngest (about 300 years old) known supernova Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa remnant in the Milky Way. Astronomers have used Chandra’s long ob - 01 02 03 04 05 servations of this remnant to make a map of the acceleration of elec - trons in this supernova remnant. The analysis shows that the electrons 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 are being accelerated to almost the maximum theoretical limit in some 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 parts of Cassiopeia A (Cas A) in what can be thought of as a “relativistic pinball machine.” Protons and ions, which make up the bulk of cosmic 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 rays, are expected to be accelerated in a similar way to the electrons. The Cas A observations thus provide strong evidence that supernova 27 28 29 30 31 remnants are key sites for energizing cosmic rays. 3C442A FEBRUARY2008 X -ray data from NASA’s Chandra X -ray Observatory and radio obser - Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa vations from the NSF’s Very Large Array show that a role reversal is 01 02 taking place in the middle of 3C442A - a system with two merging gal - 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 axies in the center. Chandra detects hot gas (blue) that has been push - ing aside the radio -bright gas (orange). This is the opposite of what 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 is typically found in these systems when jets from the supermassive black hole in the center create cavities in the hot gas surrounding the 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 galaxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacenet: Modeling and Simulating Space Logistics
    SpaceNet: Modeling and Simulating Space Logistics Gene Lee*, Elizabeth Jordan†, and Robert Shishko‡ Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91109 Olivier de Weck§, Nii Armar**, and Afreen Siddiqi†† Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139 This paper summarizes the current state of the art in interplanetary supply chain modeling and discusses SpaceNet as one particular method and tool to address space logistics modeling and simulation challenges. Fundamental upgrades to the interplanetary supply chain framework such as process groups, nested elements, and cargo sharing, enabled SpaceNet to model an integrated set of missions as a campaign. The capabilities and uses of SpaceNet are demonstrated by a step-by-step modeling and simulation of a lunar campaign. I. Introduction HE term “supply chain” has traditionally been used to refer to terrestrial logistics and the flow of commodities Tin and out of manufacturing facilities, warehouses, and retail stores. Rather than focusing on local interests, optimizing the entire supply chain can reduce costs by using resources and performing operations as efficiently as possible. There is an increasing realization that future space missions, such as the buildup and sustainment of a lunar outpost, should not be treated as isolated missions but rather as an integrated supply chain. Supply chain management at the interplanetary level will maximize scientific return, minimize transportation costs, and reduce risk through increased system availability and robustness to failures.1,2 SpaceNet is a model with a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows a user to build, simulate, and evaluate exploration missions from a logistics perspective.3 The goal of SpaceNet is to provide mission planners, logisticians, and system engineers with a software tool that focuses on what cargo is needed to support future space missions, when it is required, and how propulsive vehicles can be used to deliver that cargo.
    [Show full text]
  • An Impacting Descent Probe for Europa and the Other Galilean Moons of Jupiter
    An Impacting Descent Probe for Europa and the other Galilean Moons of Jupiter P. Wurz1,*, D. Lasi1, N. Thomas1, D. Piazza1, A. Galli1, M. Jutzi1, S. Barabash2, M. Wieser2, W. Magnes3, H. Lammer3, U. Auster4, L.I. Gurvits5,6, and W. Hajdas7 1) Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2) Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden, 3) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria, 4) Institut f. Geophysik u. Extraterrestrische Physik, Technische Universität, Braunschweig, Germany, 5) Joint Institute for VLBI ERIC, Dwingelo, The Netherlands, 6) Department of Astrodynamics and Space Missions, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands 7) Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland. *) Corresponding author, [email protected], Tel.: +41 31 631 44 26, FAX: +41 31 631 44 05 1 Abstract We present a study of an impacting descent probe that increases the science return of spacecraft orbiting or passing an atmosphere-less planetary bodies of the solar system, such as the Galilean moons of Jupiter. The descent probe is a carry-on small spacecraft (< 100 kg), to be deployed by the mother spacecraft, that brings itself onto a collisional trajectory with the targeted planetary body in a simple manner. A possible science payload includes instruments for surface imaging, characterisation of the neutral exosphere, and magnetic field and plasma measurement near the target body down to very low-altitudes (~1 km), during the probe’s fast (~km/s) descent to the surface until impact. The science goals and the concept of operation are discussed with particular reference to Europa, including options for flying through water plumes and after-impact retrieval of very-low altitude science data.
    [Show full text]
  • ESTEC White Paper Spinning in and Spinning Off: Ways to Strengthen the Ties Between ESTEC and the Dutch Knowledge Infrastructure
    ESTEC White Paper Spinning in and spinning off: Ways to strengthen the ties between ESTEC and the Dutch knowledge infrastructure The High Tech Systems and Materials top team More information can be obtained from: Office top team High Tech Systems and Materials Boerhaavelaan 40 Postbus 190 2700 AD Zoetermeer The Netherlands www.htsm.nl www.hollandhightech.nl Projectmanagement DB Huisstijlmedia Design Bruikman Reclame, Den Haag The Hague, May 2012 ESTEC White Paper Spinning in and spinning off: Ways to strengthen the ties between ESTEC and the Dutch knowledge infrastructure by the High Tech Systems and Materials top team Table of contents Summary and conclusions . 3 1. The role of ESTEC in the Netherlands . .5 . 1 .1 The space industry in a global context . 5 1 .2 The Netherlands from a European perspective . 6. 1 .3 ESTEC’s position in Europe and the Netherlands . 8 1 .4 Looking ahead: the risks and rewards of the budgetary outlook . 9 2. Spinning in and off: stronger linkages between ESTEC and the Netherlands . 11 . 2 .1 Economic and societal applications from space data . 11 2 .2 Technology transfer and valorization . 13 2 .3 Stronger ties between academia, research institutes and ESTEC . 15 2 .4 Sharing and maintaining research facilities . 16 . 2 .5 Improving ESTEC’s visibility in the Dutch knowledge infrastructure . 17 Appendix 1: Technology crossovers from space to other roadmaps in the top sector HTSM and other . 18 . Appendix 2: Acknowledgements . 20 . Appendix 3: Top team High Tech Systems and Materials . 21. 2 | ESTEC White Paper High Tech Systems and Materials Top Team Summary and conclusions In the Proposal for an Innovation Contract for the Top Sector High Tech Systems and Materials (HTSM) (December 2011, see www .htsm .nl), the HTSM top team concludes that ESTEC, the European Space Agency (ESA) technology and research site in the Netherlands, is an important contributor to this top sector’s innovation ecosystem .
    [Show full text]
  • PDS Mission Interface for Europa Mission Status of Planning for Data Archiving
    PDS Mission Interface for Europa Mission Status of Planning for Data Archiving CARTOGRAPHY AND IMAGING SCIENCES (“Imaging”) NODE PDS Lead Node Lisa Gaddis (USGS, Astrogeology) August 2016 Overview Common goals PDS4 Archiving roles, responsibilities EM archiving deliverables Data and Archive Working Group (DAWG) Archiving assignments Archiving activities to date Archiving schedule Current archiving activities Where we are now August 2016 2 Common Goals The PDS and Europa Mission (EM) will work together to ensure that we Organize, document and format EM digital planetary data in a standardized manner Collect complete, well-documented, peer-reviewed planetary data into archives Make planetary data available and useful to the science community ○ Provide online data delivery tools & services Ensure the long-term preservation and usability of the data August 2016 3 PDS4 The new PDS, an integrated data system to improve access ○ Required for all missions (e.g., used by LADEE, MAVEN) A re-architected, modern, online data system ○ Data are organized into bundles Includes all data for a particular instrument (e.g., PDF/A documents) ○ Bundles have collections Grouped files with a similar origin (e.g., Document Collection) Improves efficiency of ingestion and distribution of data ○ Uses Extensible Markup Language (XML) and standard data format templates ○ Self-consistent information model & software system ○ Information for Data Providers https://pds.nasa.gov/pds4/about ○ PDS4 Concepts Document https://pds.nasa.gov/pds4/doc/concepts/Concepts_150909.pdf
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Galileo Solid-State Imaging Instrument As a Sensor of Jovian
    Using the Galileo Solid-State Imaging Instrument as a Sensor of Jovian Energetic Electrons Ashley Carlton1, Maria de Soria-Santacruz Pich2, Insoo Jun2, Wousik Kim2, and Kerri Cahoy1 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 02139, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 91109, USA respectively. For the most part, information about the Jovian I. INTRODUCTION environment comes from the Galileo spacecraft Energetic Harsh radiation in the form of ionized, highly energetic Particle Detector (EPD) [Williams et al., 1992] (in Jovian particles is part of the space environment and can affect orbit from December 1995 to September 2003), which had a spacecraft. These particles not only sweep through the solar nearly equatorial orbit. Juno, a NASA spacecraft that entered system in the solar wind and flares and are ejected from Jovian orbit in July 2016, and Europa Clipper, a NASA galactic and extra-galactic supernovae, but also are trapped as mission planned for the 2020s, do not carry instruments belts in planetary magnetic fields. Jupiter’s magnetosphere is capable of measuring high-energy (>1 MeV) electrons. Juno is the largest and strongest of a planet in the solar system. in a polar orbit; Europa Clipper is planned to be in a highly Similar to Earth, Jupiter is roughly a magnetic dipole with a elliptical Jovian orbit, flying-by Jupiter’s moon, Europa, in tilt of ~11° [Khurana et al., 2004]. Jupiter’s magnetic field each orbit. strength is an order of magnitude larger than Earth, and its We develop a technique to extract the high-energy magnetic moment is roughly 18,000 times larger [Bagenal et electron environment using scientific imager data.
    [Show full text]