DOCSLIB.ORG

Apec Energy Overview 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

APEC ENERGY OVERVIEW 2019 APEC ENERGY OVERVIEW 2019 Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication belong solely to the authors. For consistency and veracity of the policies and other information contain here, the EGEDA focal points and EWG members of the respective economies were consulted. APEC ENERGY OVERVIEW 2019 Prepared by Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC) Inui Bldg.-Kachidoki 11F, 1-13-1 Kachidoki, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0054, JAPAN Tel: +81 (3) 5144-8551 Fax: +81 (3) 5144-8555 E-mail: [email protected] APERC Website: http://www.aperc.or.jp For the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 6775 6012 Fax: (65) 6775 6013 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.apecsec.org.sg 2019 APEC Secretariat APEC#220-RE-01.11 APEC ENERGY OVERVIEW 2019 FOREWORD FOREWORD The APEC Energy Overview (the Overview) is an annual publication that highlights the current energy situation in each of the 21 APEC economies. It has been the pioneer publication of APERC in showcasing the latest energy data in APEC compiled by the Expert Group on Energy Data and Analysis (EGEDA). The Overview traditionally serves as a point of reference for those wishing to become more informed about recent energy trends in the APEC region. It contains information on energy supply and consumption, energy related policies and notable energy developments in the region, among others. In view of the increasing request from APEC expert groups, the Overview has also become the platform to monitor APEC goals―energy intensity reduction by 45% by 2035 (against the 2005 level) and doubling renewable energy share by 2030 with 2010 as base year. It is important to note that the analysis on energy intensity improvement and renewable share of final energy consumption included in economy chapters served as indication only and not as each economy’s contribution in achieving APEC goals. As they are both collective goals, the progress on APEC energy intensity improvement as well the APEC renewable share of total primary energy supply and final energy consumption are described in the Executive Summary. You’ll be pleased to find in each economy chapter the various efforts and measures that have been put in place in achieving their stated energy goals as they continue to develop and grow. We hope that this report will help stakeholders deepen their understanding of energy issues in APEC, promote the use of EGEDA (APEC) data and provide useful insights to policy makers in the region. Kazutomo IRIE James Michael KENDELL President Chair Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre Expert Group on Energy Data and (APERC) Analysis (EGEDA) August 2020 iii APEC ENERGY OVERVIEW 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The APEC economy continued to outstrip the rest of the world in 2017 with a 4.1% increase in GDP from the 2016 level to reach USD 63 767 billion (PPP, constant 2011 USD). The rest of the world grew by only 3.4% in 2017. The increase pushed APEC’s share to the world’s GDP one percentage point higher than the 2016 level─55% in 2017. China and South-East Asia (SEA) were the biggest contributors to economic growth in APEC with 6.9% and 5.2%, respectively from 2016 to 2017. Among the South-East Asian member economies, the GDP of Viet Nam; the Philippines and Malaysia grew remarkably in 2017 at 6.8%, 6.7% and 5.9%, respectively. A similar trend was seen in total primary energy supply (TPES) with APEC accounting for more than 50% of the world’s TPES in 2017. TPES in APEC continued to bounce back with 1.7% growth to reach 8 013.63 Mtoe in 2017, after posting negative growth in 2015 (-0.3%) and sluggish growth in 2016 (0.5%). TPES growth in SEA (3.8%), China (3.3%), and Russia (2.5%) contributed significantly to the expansion in 2017. Total final energy consumption (TFEC, excluding non-energy) meanwhile continued to fluctuate. After tapering-off (0.4%) in 2015, it grew 1.3% in 2016 and slowed to 0.3% again to 4 769.84 Mtoe in 2017. The dwindling of TFEC was due in part to the contraction posted in 2017 by two large energy consumers in APEC namely, China and the US at -1.3% and -0.4%, respectively. These declines were offset by the increases from SEA (4.5%), Russia (3.6%) and other Americas (2.1%). If non-energy is included, total final consumption (TFC) reached 5 355.92 Mtoe in 2017, 0.8% more than 2016. Growth rate in TFC was bigger than TFEC as non-energy use (4.6%) drove the increase in TFC. Except for 2009, which was a recession year, the 2017 growth in final energy consumption (excluding non-energy) was by far below the average of the previous 11 years of 2.0%. Given this, energy intensity consequently improved 3.7% in 2017 from 77.65 toe/USD (PPP, constant 2011 USD) in 2016. This was the biggest improvement since 2005, the base year for APEC energy intensity goal of reducing energy intensity by 45% by 2035. Together with the steady growth of APEC GDP, 4% on average between 2005-2017, energy intensity has declined by 22.1% between those years. This is 49% of the way to the goal in 40% of the time. Using a compound decline rate, which assumes that the current trend continues at a constant rate of decline, final energy consumption intensity exceeds the APEC goal in 2035. Substantial progress was achieved in the use of modern renewables from 2010 to 2017, because of falling costs and government support, such as feed-in tariffs, auctions, and renewable portfolio standards. Given the current data, it is estimated that the renewable energy (RE) share of TFEC expanded from 6.1% in 2010 to 8.4% in 2017. Assuming this increasing trend continues, the APEC RE share of TFEC will reach 12.6% in 2030─0.4% more than the target of doubling from 2010 to 2030. In terms of TPES, the RE share increased from 4.8% in 2010 to 6.6% in 2017. Assuming this trend continues, the APEC RE share of TPES will reach 10.0% in 2030 and meet the goal. But this does not mean that APEC will stop its efforts to increase the use of RE, as more can be done to identify economy-specific barriers and formulate policy responses as part of a comprehensive roadmap. iv APEC ENERGY OVERVIEW 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank APEC member economies for the timely data information provided to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of this report. We would also like to thank members of the APEC Energy Working Group (EWG), APEC Expert Group on Energy Data and Analysis (EGEDA), and numerous government officials, for their helpful information and comments. The APEC Energy Overview 2019 could not have been accomplished without the contributions of many individuals and organisations. We would like to thank all those whose efforts made this publication possible, in particular those named below. PROJECT MANAGER Elvira Torres Gelindon PROJECT COORDINATOR Mathew Charles Horne MAIN CONTRIBUTORS Data Collection and Compilation: Expert Group on Energy Data Analysis (EGEDA) through its Coordination Agency, the Energy Statistics & Training Office (ESTO), Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC). Economy Chapters: Mathew Charles Horne (Australia), Zaharin Bin Zulkifli (Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia), Christopher James Doleman (Canada and Singapore), Victor Julio Martinez Aranza (Chile and Peru), Fang Chia Lee (China and Chinese Taipei), Gigih Udi Atmo (Indonesia), Nobuhiro Sawamura (Japan), Junseon Mun (Hong Kong, China and Korea), Diego Rivera Rivota (Mexico and Russia), Hugh Marshall-Tate (New Zealand and Papua New Guinea), Elvira Torres Gelindon (the Philippines), Ruengsak Thitiratsakul (Thailand), James Michael Kendell (United States), Dan Linh Nguyen (Viet Nam). EDITORS Anchor English Proofreading, UK under the supervision of Christopher Kennard; with internal editing and review from Mathew Charles Horne of APERC ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT Jiro Sairenji, Yoshihiro Hatano, Tomoyo Kukimoto, Yukiko Koyanagi and Yuka Hayashi v APEC ENERGY OVERVIEW 2019 CONTENTS CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. v Contents .................................................................................................................................. vi Economy chapters Australia ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Brunei Darussalam .................................................................................................................. 17 Canada .................................................................................................................................... 30 Chile ......................................................................................................................................... 59 China ....................................................................................................................................... 95 Hong Kong, China ................................................................................................................. 115 Indonesia ............................................................................................................................... 131 Japan ....................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Heads of State Heads of Government Ministers For

    Heads of State Heads of Government Ministers For

    UNITED NATIONS HEADS OF STATE Protocol and Liaison Service HEADS OF GOVERNMENT PUBLIC LIST MINISTERS FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS COUNTRY HEAD OF STATE HEAD OF GOVERNMENT MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS AFGHANISTAN His Excellency Same as Head of State His Excellency Mr. Mohammad Ashraf Ghani Mr. Mohammad Haneef Atmar Full Title President of the Islamic Republic of Acting Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Afghanistan Republic of Afghanistan Date of Appointment 29-Sep-14 04-Apr-20 ALBANIA His Excellency His Excellency same as Prime Minister Mr. Ilir Meta Mr. Edi Rama Full Title President of the Republic of Albania Prime Minister and Minister for Europe and Foreign Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs of the Affairs of the Republic of Albania Republic of Albania Date of Appointment 24-Jul-17 15-Sep-13 21-Jan-19 ALGERIA Son Excellence Son Excellence Son Excellence Monsieur Abdelmadjid Tebboune Monsieur Abdelaziz Djerad Monsieur Sabri Boukadoum Full Title Président de la République algérienne Premier Ministre de la République algérienne Ministre des Affaires étrangères de la République démocratique et populaire démocratique et populaire algérienne démocratique et populaire Date of Appointment 19-Dec-19 05-Jan-20 31-Mar-19 21/08/2020 Page 1 of 66 COUNTRY HEAD OF STATE HEAD OF GOVERNMENT MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS ANDORRA Son Excellence Son Excellence Son Excellence Monseigneur Joan Enric Vives Sicília Monsieur Xavier Espot Zamora Madame Maria Ubach Font et Son Excellence Monsieur Emmanuel Macron Full Title Co-Princes de la Principauté d’Andorre Chef du Gouvernement de la Principauté d’Andorre Ministre des Affaires étrangères de la Principauté d’Andorre Date of Appointment 16-May-12 21-May-19 17-Jul-17 ANGOLA His Excellency His Excellency Mr.
  • The Cost of Pipeline Constraints in Canada by Elmira Aliakbari and Ashley Stedman

    The Cost of Pipeline Constraints in Canada by Elmira Aliakbari and Ashley Stedman

    FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN FROM THE CENTRE FOR NATURAL RESOURCE STUDIES May 2018 The Cost of Pipeline Constraints in Canada by Elmira Aliakbari and Ashley Stedman MAIN CONCLUSIONS Despite the steady growth in crude oil From 2013 to 2017, after accounting for available for export, new pipeline proj- quality differences and transportation ects in Canada continue to face delays costs, the depressed price for Canadian related to environmental and regula- heavy crude oil has resulted in CA$20.7 tory impediments as well as political billion in foregone revenues for the Ca- opposition. nadian energy industry. This significant loss is equivalent to almost 1 percent of Canada’s lack of adequate pipeline ca- Canada’s national GDP. pacity has imposed a number of costly constraints on the nation’s energy sec- In 2018, the average price differen- tor including an overdependence on tial (based on the first quarter) was the US market and reliance on more US$26.30 per barrel. If the price differ- costly modes of energy transportation. ential remains at the current level, we These and other factors have resulted estimate that Canada’s pipeline con- in depressed prices for Canadian heavy straints will reduce revenues for Cana- crude (Western Canada Select) relative dian energy firms by roughly CA$15.8 to US crude (West Texas Intermediate) billion in 2018, which is approximately and other international benchmarks. 0.7 percent of Canada’s national GDP. Between 2009 and 2012, the average Insufficient pipeline capacity has re- price differential between Western sulted in substantial lost revenue for Canada Select (WCS) and West Texas the energy industry and thus imposed Intermediate (WTI) was about 13 per- significant costs on the economy as a cent of the WTI price.
  • Politics in Papua New Guinea 2017–20: from O'neill to Marape

    Politics in Papua New Guinea 2017–20: from O'neill to Marape

    Politics in Papua New Guinea 2017–20: From O’Neill to Marape R.J. May Discussion Paper 2020/3 The author has been chronicling the politics of Papua prosecutor); and amendments to the constitution and New Guinea (PNG) for decades, and this Discussion the Organic Law on the Integrity of Political Parties and Paper constitutes the most recent instalment in that Candidates (the general effects of which were to make body of work. It is hoped this account will assist it more difficult to remove a sitting government, which observers of the latest developments in the fast- attracted successful challenges). moving and frequently unpredictable world of political By 2015, popular opposition to O’Neill was growing contestation in PNG. and there were calls for him to step down. In October In an earlier paper, I surveyed the events in PNG that year, a protest rally in Port Moresby was broken politics from the political coup against incumbent up by police, with several protesters injured in the prime minister Sir Michael Somare in 2011 through confrontation. The following year saw students at to early 2017, preceding the country’s ninth post- the country’s four state universities initiate a boycott independence general election (May 2017). During this of classes in protest against the government; they time, PNG was governed by a coalition headed by Peter were supported by the PNG Trade Union Congress, O’Neill. That paper, which detailed the way O’Neill a coalition of civil society groups that called for a came to power — in defiance of two Supreme Court National Disobedience Day and opposition politicians decisions in 2011–12 and then through legitimate who sought a parliamentary vote of no confidence.
  • GAO-07-315 Crude Oil: California Crude Oil Price Fluctuations Are

    GAO-07-315 Crude Oil: California Crude Oil Price Fluctuations Are

    United States Government Accountability Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters January 2007 CRUDE OIL California Crude Oil Price Fluctuations Are Consistent with Broader Market Trends a GAO-07-315 January 2007 CRUDE OIL Accountability Integrity Reliability Highlights California Crude Oil Price Fluctuations Highlights of GAO-07-315, a report to Are Consistent with Broader Market congressional requesters Trends Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found California is the nation’s fourth California crude oil price differentials have experienced numerous and large largest producer of crude oil and fluctuations over the past 20 years. The largest spike in the price differential has the third largest oil refining began in mid-2004 and continued into 2005, during which the price industry (behind Texas and differential between WTI and a California crude oil called Kern River rose Louisiana). Because crude oil is a from about $6 to about $15 per barrel. This increase in the price differential globally traded commodity, natural and geopolitical events can affect between WTI and California crude oils occurred in a period of generally its price. These fluctuations affect increasing world oil prices during which prices for both WTI and California state revenues because a share of crude oils rose. Differentials between WTI and other oils also expanded in the royalty payments from the same time period. The differentials have since fallen somewhat but companies that lease state or remain relatively high by historical standards. federal lands to produce crude oil are distributed to the states. Recent trends in California crude oil price differentials are consistent with a number of changing market conditions.
  • U.S.-Canada Cross- Border Petroleum Trade

    U.S.-Canada Cross- Border Petroleum Trade

    U.S.-Canada Cross- Border Petroleum Trade: An Assessment of Energy Security and Economic Benefits March 2021 Submitted to: American Petroleum Institute 200 Massachusetts Ave NW Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20001 Submitted by: Kevin DeCorla-Souza ICF Resources L.L.C. 9300 Lee Hwy Fairfax, VA 22031 U.S.-Canada Cross-Border Petroleum Trade: An Assessment of Energy Security and Economic Benefits This report was commissioned by the American Petroleum Institute (API) 2 U.S.-Canada Cross-Border Petroleum Trade: An Assessment of Energy Security and Economic Benefits Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 4 II. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 III. Overview of U.S.-Canada Petroleum Trade ................................................................. 7 U.S.-Canada Petroleum Trade Volumes Have Surged ........................................................... 7 Petroleum Is a Major Component of Total U.S.-Canada Bilateral Trade ................................. 8 IV. North American Oil Production and Refining Markets Integration ...........................10 U.S.-Canada Oil Trade Reduces North American Dependence on Overseas Crude Oil Imports ..................................................................................................................................10 Cross-Border Pipelines Facilitate U.S.-Canada Oil Market Integration...................................14
  • Dragoman Digest. 28.08.2020

    Dragoman Digest. 28.08.2020

    Dragoman Digest. 28.08.2020 Australia’s trade with China – back in the spotlight China looks to be making efforts to diversify away from reliance on Australia Last week China announced it would open an anti-dumping investigation into Australian wine exports, reigniting debate over the two countries’ trading relationship. Fortunately for the Australian economy, exports of iron ore and coal – worth AU$63 billion and AU$14 billion in 2018/19, respectively – have thus far not been affected by political tensions. Exports of coking and thermal coal increased in the first half of the year, while iron ore exports hit a record high in June. However, China appears to be making efforts to wean itself away from reliance on Australian natural resources. In June, a Chinese-backed consortium won preliminary approval to develop the Simandou mine in Guinea – the world’s largest untapped source of iron ore. China has also made other investments in Liberia and Sierra Leonne and recently opened up four new domestic ports for so called ‘Chinamax’ ships – potentially paving the way for additional iron shipments from Africa and Brazil. China is pushing ahead to develop Thar Block-I, Pakistan’s largest coalfield. Developing these mines and the necessary infrastructure will of course take considerable time. Political instability remains a challenge in most of these countries and it is unclear whether these new sources of coal and iron ore will be competitive with Australian exports on price and quality. Nonetheless, China’s infrastructure building spree and reliance on coal will not last forever. Policymakers may eventually need to grapple with the possibility that Chinese demand for Australia’s resources is not inexhaustible.
  • Note by the President of the General Assembly

    Note by the President of the General Assembly

    United Nations A/75/592/Add.7 General Assembly Distr.: General Seventy-fifth session 13 January 2021 Original: English Seventy-fifth session Agenda item 8 General debate Note by the President of the General Assembly I have the honour to circulate, pursuant to decision 74/562 of 22 July 2020, the present compilation document of the statements delivered by Heads of State or other dignitaries by means of pre-recorded statements during the general debate and submitted to the President no later than the day on which the pre-recorded statement is played in the Assembly Hall. The statements contained in the present document were delivered on the afternoon of Friday, 25 September 2020, at the 11th meeting of the General Assembly (see A/75/PV.11). Document A/75/592 and its addenda 1 through 11 contain the statements delivered in the 4th through the 15th meetings of the General Assembly (A/75/PV.4-A/75/PV.15). In accordance with decision 74/562, and without setting a precedent for mandated high-level meetings planned for future high-level weeks, the official records of the General Assembly will be supplemented by annexes containing pre-recorded statements submitted by Heads of State or other dignitaries, submitted to the President no later than the day on which such statements are delivered in the Assembly Hall. Submissions in this regard should be made to [email protected].. 21-00393 (E) *2100393* A/75/592/Add.7 13/01/2021 Kiribati (see also A/75/PV.11, annex I) Address by Mr.
  • The Role of Financial Markets in the Pricing of Crude Oil: An

    The Role of Financial Markets in the Pricing of Crude Oil: An

    THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL MARKETS IN THE PRICING OF CRUDE OIL: AN EXAMINATION OF OIL PRICING THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL CHANGES OF THE EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY A DISSERTATION IN Economics and Social Sciences Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by STEPHANIE LEIGH SHELDON B.A., Webster University, 2005 Kansas City, Missouri 2016 © 2016 STEPHANIE LEIGH SHELDON ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL MARKETS IN THE PRICING OF CRUDE OIL: AN EXAMINATION OF OIL PRICING THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL CHANGES OF THE EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY Stephanie L. Sheldon, Candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2016 ABSTRACT The debate over the causes of the path of the price of oil over the twenty-first century has failed to address the method of oil pricing. The thesis guiding this dissertation is that the crude oil pricing method constrains the influence of financial investors in oil futures via (1) a two-part price system, (2) the role of both spot and contract markets, and (3) the connections between the futures market and the specific physical market related to the futures contract. Market participants construct the pricing method and adjust it through historical time and context, similar to methods of pricing found in manufacturing and retail markets. The details of the physical oil market, grounded in the pricing method, leads to the application in chapter 5. The chapter examines the behavior of prices for WTI and Brent-related futures markets as well as for one light sweet and one medium sour crude oil at the US Gulf coast.
  • Database Americas, W Europe, C&E Europe, Africa, Oceania DONE.Xlsx

    Database Americas, W Europe, C&E Europe, Africa, Oceania DONE.Xlsx

    Country Position Name Email Twitter Australia Prime Minister Mr. Scott Morrison Twitter: @Scott Morrison Minister of Foreign Affairs Ms. Marise Payne [email protected] Twitter: MarisepayneMP UN Ambassador in New York H.E. Mr. Mitch Fifield [email protected] Twitter: @AustraliaUN Disarmament Ambassador in GenevaH.E. Ms Sally Mansfield [email protected] Fiji President Mr. Jioji Konrote Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Frank Bainimarama [email protected] Twitter: @FijiPM UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Ms. Satyendra Prasad [email protected] Twitter: @ThomsonFiji UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Mrs. Nazhat Shameen Khan, [email protected] Indonesia President Mr. Joko Widodo [email protected] Twitter: Jokowi_ID Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Retno Marsudi [email protected] Twitter: Portal_Kemlu_RI UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Mr. Dian Triansyah Djani [email protected] Twitter: @indonesiaunny UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Mr. Hasan Kleib [email protected] Marshall Islands President Mr. David Kabua Twitter: @President_Heine Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Jalan Subok [email protected] Twitter: @MinisterSilk UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Ms. Amatlain Elizabeth Kabua [email protected] Twitter: @RMIMission UN Ambassdor in Geneva H. E. Ms. Doreen Debrum [email protected] New Zealand Prime Minister Ms Jacinda Ardern [email protected] Twitter: @MFATgovtNZ Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Winston Peters [email protected] Twitter: @NZUN UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Mr. Craig John Hawke [email protected] Disarmament Ambassador H.E. Mrs Dell Higgie [email protected] Papua New Guinea Prime Minister Mr.
  • The Executive Survey General Information and Guidelines

    The Executive Survey General Information and Guidelines

    The Executive Survey General Information and Guidelines Dear Country Expert, In this section, we distinguish between the head of state (HOS) and the head of government (HOG). • The Head of State (HOS) is an individual or collective body that serves as the chief public representative of the country; his or her function could be purely ceremonial. • The Head of Government (HOG) is the chief officer(s) of the executive branch of government; the HOG may also be HOS, in which case the executive survey only pertains to the HOS. • The executive survey applies to the person who effectively holds these positions in practice. • The HOS/HOG pair will always include the effective ruler of the country, even if for a period this is the commander of foreign occupying forces. • The HOS and/or HOG must rule over a significant part of the country’s territory. • The HOS and/or HOG must be a resident of the country — governments in exile are not listed. • By implication, if you are considering a semi-sovereign territory, such as a colony or an annexed territory, the HOS and/or HOG will be a person located in the territory in question, not in the capital of the colonizing/annexing country. • Only HOSs and/or HOGs who stay in power for 100 consecutive days or more will be included in the surveys. • A country may go without a HOG but there will be no period listed with only a HOG and no HOS. • If a HOG also becomes HOS (interim or full), s/he is moved to the HOS list and removed from the HOG list for the duration of their tenure.
  • The Spectre of Weakening Prices

    The Spectre of Weakening Prices

    Oil & gas macro outlook The spectre of weakening prices 16 August 2010 Crude oil and refined product markets are in significant surplus currently which sets the scene for some near-term weakness in prices. A lacklustre price trend Analysts Peter J Dupont 020 3077 5700 is also expected to extend into 2011 reflecting the likely persistence of well Neil Shah 020 3077 5715 supplied markets and historically high inventories. Weak fundamentals relate to Ian McLelland 020 3077 5700 OPEC and non-OPEC supply additions and an increasingly lacklustre economic Elaine Reynolds 020 3077 5700 [email protected] backdrop. For institutional enquiries please contact: Alex Gunz 020 3077 5746 Crude oil supply/demand outlook Gareth Jones 020 3077 5704 [email protected] The upward trend in US and OECD inventories over the past year or more points to a crude oil market in surplus. Inventories are now close to 20-year and at least WTI vs Brent 12-year highs respectively. For 2010 we look for a supply surplus of at least 90 0.5mmb/d and approximate balance in 2011. 70 50 Crude oil prices $ barrel per 30 Light crude oil prices have trended broadly flat since the end of the third quarter of 2009. Prices firmed in the month to early August 2010 with West Texas Jul/09 Jul/10 Apr/09 Apr/10 Jan/10 Jan/09 Oct/09 Intermediate (WTI) hitting a recent high of $82.6/barrel. Subsequently, prices have Brent WTI AIM Oil & Gas Index come under significant pressure taking WTI down to $78.4/barrel on August 11, 7000 reflecting rising inventories and bearish US and China macroeconomic news.
  • Quality and Chemistry of Crude Oils

    Quality and Chemistry of Crude Oils

    Journal of Petroleum Technology and Alternative Fuels Vol. 4(3), pp. 53-63, March 2013 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/JPTAF DOI:10.5897/JPTAF12.025 ©2013 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Quality and chemistry of crude oils Ghulam Yasin1*, Muhammad Iqbal Bhanger2, Tariq Mahmood Ansari1, Syed Muhammad Sibtain Raza Naqvi3, Muhammad Ashraf1, Khizar1 Ahmad and Farah Naz Talpur2 1Department of Chemistry Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan. 2National Centre of Excellence in Analytical Chemistry, University of Sindh, Jamshoro 76080, Pakistan. 3HDIP Petroleum Testing Laboratory, Multan, Pakistan. Accepted 25 January, 2013 Physico-chemical characteristics such as API (American Petroleum Institute gravity) specific gravity, pour point, Calorific value, Kinematic viscosities, Reid vapour pressure, Copper corrosion, Water and sediments, Total Sulphur, Distillation range (I.B.P.F.B.P., Total recovery), residue and hydrocarbon contents (saturates, aromatics and polar) of crude oils collected from different oil fields of North (Punjab) and South (Sindh) regions of Pakistan have been evaluated using standard ASTM (American Society for Testing and Material) procedures. The results of North Region (Punjab) and South Region (Sindh) crude oils have been compared with each other. Punjab crude oils are better than Sindh crude oils because these have low specific gravity, low sulphur contents, low viscosity and low pour point. All the tested samples are of sweet type on the basis of total sulfur contents except three (L, N, O) samples of south (Sindh) region which are of sour type. All the tested samples belongs to the class light crude oil on the basis of API gravity except one (N) sample which belongs to the medium class.