Airpower for Strategic Effect Air University Series on Airpower and National Security

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Airpower for Strategic Effect Air University Series on Airpower and National Security Airpower for Strategic Effect Air University Series on Airpower and National Security Divining Victory by William M. Arkin (2007) The Quest for Relevant Air Power by Christian F. Anrig (2011) Airpower for Strategic Effect by Colin S. Gray (2012) Bomber: The Formation and Early Years of Strategic Air Command by Phillip S. Meilinger (forthcoming) Airpower for Strategic Effect Colin S. Gray Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama February 2012 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gray, Colin S. Airpower for strategic effect / Colin S. Gray. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-58566-218-0 1. Air power. 2. Air power—United States. I. Title. UG630.G75 2011 358.4'03--dc23 2011035404 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Copyright 2012 by Colin S. Gray The author retains all rights to this work granted under 17 USC §106. The US Air Force retains nonexclusive royalty-free license to publish and distribute this work. AFRI Air Force Research Institute Air University Press Air Force Research Institute 155 North Twining Street Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6026 http://aupress.au.af.mil iv This book is dedicated to the memory of my father, William “Bill” Gray, who said that the proudest moment of his life was when he was awarded his “wings” in the RAF in 1943. Contents Foreword ix About the Author xiii Preface xv 1 Airpower: A Contested Narrative 1 Approach 2 What Is Airpower? An Open Question Still 6 Some Keys to Understanding 12 Faith, Interest, and Fear 17 Disarray: Diagnosis and Prescription 20 Conclusion: From Wonder to Routine 22 2 Ideas for Action 27 Locating Airpower 30 The General Theory of Strategy 35 The General Theory for Education 40 Policy, Strategy, Tactics: What or Who Is in Charge? 45 Between Politics and Tactics: The Strategist’s Dilemma 49 Conclusion: Scope for Discretion 51 3 Geographies of Warfare 57 Airpower Controversy 58 The Joint Challenge 61 Out of Joint 66 The Territorial Imperative 72 Strategy and Air Strategy 76 Conclusion: E Pluribus Unum? 80 4 Strategic History I: Sagittarius Rising, 1903–39 85 Prelude, 1903–14 88 Beginnings, 1914–18 90 Promise, 1919–39 100 Conclusion: Coming, Ready or Not 107 vii CONTENTS 5 Strategic History II: The Great Test, 1939–45 113 Air War within the War 115 Blitzkrieg and the Battle of Britain, 1939–40 117 Airpower, Joint Warfare in the West, 1941–45 128 The Eastern Front, 1941–45 132 Strategic Bombing in Europe, 1940–45 134 Air Warfare in Asia-Pacific, 1941–45 143 Conclusion: Slessor Was Mainly Correct 147 6 Strategic History III: Troubled Triumph, 1945–89 157 Airpower and Nuclear Weapons 158 Airpower in Korea 165 Airpower in Vietnam 171 Conclusion: Promise Unfulfilled 182 7 Strategic History IV: Strategic Moment, 1990–99 189 Recap: From the Past to the Brink of the Present 192 Weapon of Choice: Operational Airpower, 1991–99 197 Conceptual Renaissance 205 Conclusion: Airpower Transformed—but “So What?” 226 8 Strategic History V: Airpower after 9/11 235 Airpower and the War on Terrorists 238 A Decade of Terror 242 Afghanistan and Iraq, 2001–Present 246 Second Lebanon and Gaza 255 Conclusion: Continuity in Change in the Big Picture 262 9 Airpower Theory 267 Airpower Theory in 27 Dicta: A Granular Approach 274 Conclusion: Theory Rules! 304 10 Per Ardua ad Astra 307 Bibliography 317 Index 347 viii Foreword The 12 years that spanned the first Persian Gulf War of 1991 and the three weeks of major combat in Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003 were a triumphal time for American airpower. By the end of that eventful period, featuring five successful air-dominated campaigns that also included Operations Deliberate Force, Allied Force, and En- during Freedom, America’s air weapon could be fairly said to have matured in its ability to deliver repeatedly the sorts of outcome-de- termining results that airpower’s pioneer theoreticians had foreseen generations before. The ensuing years since that unbroken chain of successes, however, have entailed a different mode of combat and, as a result, a less-pre- eminent role for airpower. During the more recent period, the sorts of high-end challenges that prompted America’s aerial involvements from 1991 to 2003 have been displaced, at least for the time being, by lower-intensity counterinsurgency operations in which the air input, while no less important than before as a shaper of events, has taken a secondary role to ground troops as the starring force element. In the eyes of many, this shift in the character of Washington’s latest combat involvements has cast air operations in general, and the US Air Force in particular, in a decidedly subordinate role. Not only that, it has been said by some to have had the pernicious effect of inclining many younger Air Force Airmen who have been exposed to no other form of operational commitment during their relatively short time in the ranks to infer from their limited experience that their service’s main purpose is to support land warfare by US Army and Marine Corps combatants. In its worst extreme, the changed nature of today’s en- gagements and the consequent lower profile maintained by airpower in them has led more than a few to ask why the United States even needs an independent Air Force any more. In this magisterial tour d’horizon of the air weapon’s steady rise in effectiveness since its fledgling days, Colin Gray, a prolific strate gist of long-standing scholarly achievement and international repute, has rightly taken a long view of today’s pattern of regional conflict by ap- praising airpower in the broader context in which its operational payoff will ultimately be registered. His careful development of air- power’s “strategic narrative,” as he calls it, shows convincingly how the relative criticality of the air weapon in joint warfare is neither ix FOREWORD universal nor unchanging but rather is crucially dependent on the particular circumstances of a confrontation. More to the point, viewed situationally, airpower can be every- thing from single-handedly decisive to largely irrelevant to a combat- ant commander’s needs, depending on his most pressing challenges of the moment. Because its relative import, like that of all other force elements, hinges directly on how its comparative advantages relate to a commander’s most immediate here-and-now concerns, airpower does not disappoint when it is not the main producer of desired out- comes. Indeed, the idea that airpower should be able to perform ef- fectively in all forms of combat unaided by other force elements is both an absurd measure of its operational merit and a baseless argu- ing point that its most outspoken advocates, from Giulio Douhet and Billy Mitchell onward, have done their cause a major disservice by misguidedly espousing over many decades. Although the air weapon today may have been temporarily overshadowed by more land-cen- tric forms of force employment, given the kinds of lower-intensity conflicts that the United States and its allies have been obliged to con- tend with in recent years, there will most assuredly be future times when new challenges yet to arise will again test America’s air posture to the fullest extent of its deterrent and combat potential. Professor Gray’s central theme is that airpower generates strategic effect. More specifically, he maintains, airpower is a tactical equity that operates—ideally—with strategic consequences. To him, “strate- gic” does not inhere in the equity’s physical characteristics, such as an aircraft’s range or payload, but rather in what it can do by way of pro- ducing desired results. From his perspective, a strategic effect is, first and foremost, that which enables outcome-determining results. And producing such results is quintessentially the stock in trade of Amer- ican airpower as it has progressively evolved since Vietnam. Airpower for Strategic Effect offers an uncommonly thoughtful ap- plication of informed intellect to an explanation of how modern air warfare capabilities should be understood. Along the way, it puts for- ward a roster of observations about the air weapon that warrant care- ful reflection by all who would presume to find it wanting. Among the most notable of those observations are that context rules in every case and that whether airpower should be regarded as supported by or supporting of other force elements is not a question that can ever have a single answer for all time. Rather, as noted above, the answer will hinge invariably on the unique conditions of any given conflict. x FOREWORD It naturally follows that whenever airpower has been said to have “failed,” it has only been because more was expected of it than it could deliver. Any tool can appear deficient if used unwisely or irresponsi- bly. And as both the United States and Israel have experienced in their most recent airpower applications, even the most robust and capable air weapon can never be more effective than the strategy it is intended to support. On the strength of this teaching, perhaps the single most helpful service air warfare professionals can perform for their cause is to un- derpromise and overdeliver as a matter of standard practice. In this regard, Professor Gray repeatedly voices a stern reminder that a long history of overpromising on the part of airpower’s most vocal propo- nents has needlessly sold the air weapon short for what it is actually able to deliver to joint force commanders today—and not just in high-intensity combat, but in all forms of operations across the con- flict spectrum.
Recommended publications
  • How the Luftwaffe Lost the Battle of Britain British Courage and Capability Might Not Have Been Enough to Win; German Mistakes Were Also Key
    How the Luftwaffe Lost the Battle of Britain British courage and capability might not have been enough to win; German mistakes were also key. By John T. Correll n July 1940, the situation looked “We shall fight on the beaches, we shall can do more than delay the result.” Gen. dire for Great Britain. It had taken fight on the landing grounds, we shall Maxime Weygand, commander in chief Germany less than two months to fight in the fields and in the streets, we of French military forces until France’s invade and conquer most of Western shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, predicted, “In three weeks, IEurope. The fast-moving German Army, surrender.” England will have her neck wrung like supported by panzers and Stuka dive Not everyone agreed with Churchill. a chicken.” bombers, overwhelmed the Netherlands Appeasement and defeatism were rife in Thus it was that the events of July 10 and Belgium in a matter of days. France, the British Foreign Office. The Foreign through Oct. 31—known to history as the which had 114 divisions and outnumbered Secretary, Lord Halifax, believed that Battle of Britain—came as a surprise to the Germany in tanks and artillery, held out a Britain had lost already. To Churchill’s prophets of doom. Britain won. The RAF little longer but surrendered on June 22. fury, the undersecretary of state for for- proved to be a better combat force than Britain was fortunate to have extracted its eign affairs, Richard A. “Rab” Butler, told the Luftwaffe in almost every respect.
    [Show full text]
  • Training FLES Teachersinclude
    DOCUMENT RESUME RD 077 302 ,FL 004 378 AUTHOR Lipton, Gladys C., Ed.;.Spaar-Rauch,Virginia, Ed. TITLE FLES: Patterns for Change. A Reportby the FLES Committee of the American Associationof Teachers of French. INSTITUTION American Association of Teachers ofFrench. PUB DATE 28 Dec 70 NOTE 129p.; Report presented in NewOrleans, Louisiana, December 28, 1970 AVAILABLE_ FROMMLA Materials Center, 62 FifthAve., New York, N.Y. ($4.00) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS Anthropology; Audiolingual Methods;Audiovisual Aids; Audiovisual Instruction; EducationalInnovation; Educational Theories; ElementaryEducation; *Fles; *Fles Programs; *Iles Teachers;Inservice leacher Education; Instructional Innovation;*Language Instruction; Language Programs; ModernLanguages; *Teacher Education; Teaching Methods ABSTRACT This annual report considersmajor changes in education in general and offersnumerous suggestions to FLES teachers, supervisors, and administratorsfor revamping current FLES programs in the light of current socioeconomicpressures. Articles pertaining to two broadareas -- alternatives in FLESprograms and in training FLES teachersinclude:(1) "FLES in Louisiana- -Progressand Promise,"(2) "Suggested Application ofInnovations to FLES Programs," (3) "Innovations, andChanging Goals of Education and FLES," (4) "Common Goals of FLESand Anthropology," (5) "In theFLES Classzoom-A Change in Approach,"(6) "The Preparation of FLES Teachers," (7) "The FLES Teacherand Audio-Visual Equipment and Materials," and (8) "In-Service Trainingfor the FLES Teacher." The names and addresses of members of theFLES Committee of the American Association of Teachers of Frenchfor 197 0 are listed. (This document previously announced as ED 051 687.)pu4 FLES: PATTERNS FOR CHANGE A REPORT BY XH8 FLES COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS OF FRENCH P Co-Chairmen Dr. Gladys C.
    [Show full text]
  • Blitzkrieg: the Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht's
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2021 Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era Briggs Evans East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Evans, Briggs, "Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era" (2021). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3927. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3927 This Thesis - unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era ________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ______________________ by Briggs Evans August 2021 _____________________ Dr. Stephen Fritz, Chair Dr. Henry Antkiewicz Dr. Steve Nash Keywords: Blitzkrieg, doctrine, operational warfare, American military, Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe, World War II, Cold War, Soviet Union, Operation Desert Storm, AirLand Battle, Combined Arms Theory, mobile warfare, maneuver warfare. ABSTRACT Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era by Briggs Evans The evolution of United States military doctrine was heavily influenced by the Wehrmacht and their early Blitzkrieg campaigns during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Frank Cooper on Air Force Policy in the 1950S & 1960S
    The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society Copyright © Royal Air Force Historical Society, 1993 All rights reserved. 1 Copyright © 1993 by Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 1993 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. Printed by Hastings Printing Company Limited Royal Air Force Historical Society 2 THE PROCEEDINGS OFTHE ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY Issue No 11 President: Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Committee Chairman: Air Marshal Sir Frederick B Sowrey KCB CBE AFC General Secretary: Group Captain J C Ainsworth CEng MRAeS Membership Secretary: Commander P O Montgomery VRD RNR Treasurer: D Goch Esq FCCA Programme Air Vice-Marshal G P Black CB OBE AFC Sub-Committee: Air Vice-Marshal F D G Clark CBE BA Air Commodore J G Greenhill FBIM T C G James CMG MA *Group Captain I Madelin Air Commodore H A Probert MBE MA Group Captain A R Thompson MBE MPhil BA FBIM MIPM Members: A S Bennell Esq MA BLitt *Dr M A Fopp MA PhD FMA FBIM A E Richardson *Group Captain N E Taylor BSc D H Wood Comp RAeS * Ex-officio The General Secretary Regrettably our General Secretary of five years standing, Mr B R Jutsum, has found it necessary to resign from the post and the committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Sac's Kissing Cousins
    Ground crewmen bring a British RAF Bomber Command Vulcan V-bomber to a high state of readiness. In case of nuclear war bombers of the British V-force would likely spearhead any retaliatory attack. Vuleans, the world's largest delta. wing bombers, carry either conventional or nuclear bombs internally and one Blue Steel standoff weapon externally. Although there are some misgivings about the future, today's British RAF Bomber Command is decidedly a viable force for the 1960s. Here is a report on the powerful capabilities of the United Kingdom's nuclear aerospace force . SAC'S KISSING COUSINS HE officer commanding, seated in the War Room of his operational control center, reached for the T red phone and spoke an order into it which ener- gized his widely dispersed command. The order was a single word—Scramble! A small but superbly trained band of men sprang into action. With machine precision, they raced By Richard Clayton Peet through prescribed checkout procedures, preparing their planes for flight. Jet engines began their roar. Seconds later, hundreds of aircraft were on the roll. In less than two minutes, a giant nuclear retaliatory armada was airborne. Most Americans would immediately conclude that the situation described was taking place in our own Strategic Air Command. We have become accustomed 28 AIR FORCE Magazine • January 1964 Sir John Grandy, Bomber Commander CinC, credits Valiant, first V-bomber, today is used primarily as a tanker. technical innovation and high crew proficiency with Here a Valiant refuels one of the Vulcans that made the first keeping Bomber Command a viable force in the 1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects-Based Operations and the Law of Aerial Warfare
    Washington University Global Studies Law Review Volume 5 Issue 2 January 2006 Effects-based Operations and the Law of Aerial Warfare Michael N. Schmitt George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies Part of the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Michael N. Schmitt, Effects-based Operations and the Law of Aerial Warfare, 5 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 265 (2006), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol5/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Global Studies Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington University Global Studies Law Review VOLUME 5 NUMBER 2 2006 EFFECTS-BASED OPERATIONS AND THE LAW OF AERIAL WARFARE MICHAEL N. SCHMITT* Law responds almost instinctively to tectonic shifts in warfare.1 For instance, the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 constituted a dramatic reaction to the suffering of civilian populations during World War II.2 Similarly, the 1977 Protocols Additional3 updated and expanded the law of armed conflict (LOAC) in response both to the growing prevalence of non-international armed conflicts and wars of national liberation and to the recognized need to codify the norms governing the conduct of hostilities.4 In light of this symbiotic relationship, it is essential that LOAC experts carefully monitor developments in military affairs, because such developments may well either strain or strengthen aspects of that body of law.5 As an example, the widespread use in Iraq of civilian contractors and * Professor of International Law and Director, Program in Advanced Security Studies, George C.
    [Show full text]
  • Transracial Parenting in Foster Care and Adoption
    Transracial Parenting in Foster Care & Adoption - Strengthening Your Bicultural Family This guidebook was created to help parents and children in transracial homes learn how to thrive in and celebrate their bicultural family; and for children to gain a strong sense of racial identity and cultural connections. 1 Transracial Parenting in Foster Care & Adoption - Strengthening Your Bicultural Family 2 Transracial Parenting in Foster Care & Adoption - Strengthening Your Bicultural Family Table of Contents: Page # INTRODUCTION 4 A TRANSRACIALLY-ADOPTED CHILD’S BILL OF RIGHTS 5 TRANSRACIAL PARENTING PLEDGE 6 WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE A TRANSRACIAL FAMILY? 7 HOW FAR HAVE WE COME? THE HISTORY OF TRANSRACIAL FAMILIES 8 - 10 GENERAL PARENTING TASKS FOR TRANSRACIAL PARENTS 11 - 14 HOW TO CONNECT YOUR CHILD TO THEIR CULTURE - 15 - 16 AND HOW TO BECOME A BICULTURAL FAMILY THE VOICES OF ADULT TRANSRACIAL ADOPTEES 17 - 24 RACISM AND DISCRIMINATION – FOSTERING RACIAL COPING SKILLS 25 - 28 ANSWERING TOUGH QUESTIONS 28 - 29 SKIN CARE & HAIR CARE 30 - 32 RESOURCES 33 - 46 General Transracial Resources Online Help, Books, Videos, Toys & Dolls Organizations & Internet Resources Cultural Camps African American Resources Asian American Resources Native American Resources Hispanic Resources European American Resources Arab American Resources Language & Self-assessment tools 3 Transracial Parenting in Foster Care & Adoption - Strengthening Your Bicultural Family INTRODUCTION According to transracial adoption expert Joseph Crumbley, all foster children, whether in a transracial placement or not, worry “Will I be accepted in this home, even if I am from a different (biological) family?” Children in transracial homes also worry “Will I be accepted even if I’m from a different race?” This booklet will help you understand the importance of race and culture for your family; and share helpful hints, parenting tips and resources for you on the culturally rich journey of transracial parenting.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Army Air Forces in WWII
    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE Air Force Historical Studies Office 28 June 2011 Errata Sheet for the Air Force History and Museum Program publication: With Courage: the United States Army Air Forces in WWII, 1994, by Bernard C. Nalty, John F. Shiner, and George M. Watson. Page 215 Correct: Second Lieutenant Lloyd D. Hughes To: Second Lieutenant Lloyd H. Hughes Page 218 Correct Lieutenant Hughes To: Second Lieutenant Lloyd H. Hughes Page 357 Correct Hughes, Lloyd D., 215, 218 To: Hughes, Lloyd H., 215, 218 Foreword In the last decade of the twentieth century, the United States Air Force commemorates two significant benchmarks in its heritage. The first is the occasion for the publication of this book, a tribute to the men and women who served in the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War 11. The four years between 1991 and 1995 mark the fiftieth anniversary cycle of events in which the nation raised and trained an air armada and com- mitted it to operations on a scale unknown to that time. With Courage: U.S.Army Air Forces in World War ZZ retells the story of sacrifice, valor, and achievements in air campaigns against tough, determined adversaries. It describes the development of a uniquely American doctrine for the application of air power against an opponent's key industries and centers of national life, a doctrine whose legacy today is the Global Reach - Global Power strategic planning framework of the modern U.S. Air Force. The narrative integrates aspects of strategic intelligence, logistics, technology, and leadership to offer a full yet concise account of the contributions of American air power to victory in that war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legendary and Controversial Airpower Theorist Is Debated to This Day
    The legendary and controversial airpower theorist is debated to this day. Douhet By Robert S. Dudney called many things: airpower “prophet,” theorist, evangelist, visionary, charlatan. He is viewed by many as the “father of airpower,” the first to see its true strategic potential. Phillip S. Meilinger, the airpower historian and analyst, called him “the first great air theorist” and “perhaps the most important air theorist.” Douhet’s basic work, The Command of the Air, published in 1921, was the first compre- hensive analysis of airpower. To critics, the name “Douhet” is syn- onymous with a dark side of airpower. They say he articulated a vision glorify- ing the “knockout blow” with fleets of bombers prowling the skies, burning cities, and causing mass death. His book, to critics, stands as the last word on airpower extremism—the idea that airpower alone could win wars. For decades, the writings of Douhet have generated intense debate. The clash of opinion goes on unabated, even though he went to the grave in 1930. “Clearly, Giulio Douhet was a vision- ary,” said military historian I. B. Hol- ley. “With only the scantiest empirical evidence to go on, he visualized the concept of strategic air war. By sheer imagination, he also recognized the necessity of air supremacy or what he called ‘command of the air.’ ” He did all of this by 1915, Holley noted, almost before there even was such a thing as military aviation. Douhet was born on May 30, 1869, in Caserta, near Naples, into a family with a history of military service. Young Douhet was an excellent student, stand- n 1911, Italy went to war with the This long-ago war also had a historic ing first in his class at Genoa Military fading Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO's WHO in the WAR in EUROPE the War in Europe 7 CHARLES DE GAULLE
    who’s Who in the War in Europe (National Archives and Records Administration, 342-FH-3A-20068.) POLITICAL LEADERS Allies FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT When World War II began, many Americans strongly opposed involvement in foreign conflicts. President Roosevelt maintained official USneutrality but supported measures like the Lend-Lease Act, which provided invaluable aid to countries battling Axis aggression. After Pearl Harbor and Germany’s declaration of war on the United States, Roosevelt rallied the country to fight the Axis powers as part of the Grand Alliance with Great Britain and the Soviet Union. (Image: Library of Congress, LC-USZ62-128765.) WINSTON CHURCHILL In the 1930s, Churchill fiercely opposed Westernappeasement of Nazi Germany. He became prime minister in May 1940 following a German blitzkrieg (lightning war) against Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, and France. He then played a pivotal role in building a global alliance to stop the German juggernaut. One of the greatest orators of the century, Churchill raised the spirits of his countrymen through the war’s darkest days as Germany threatened to invade Great Britain and unleashed a devastating nighttime bombing program on London and other major cities. (Image: Library of Congress, LC-USW33-019093-C.) JOSEPH STALIN Stalin rose through the ranks of the Communist Party to emerge as the absolute ruler of the Soviet Union. In the 1930s, he conducted a reign of terror against his political opponents, including much of the country’s top military leadership. His purge of Red Army generals suspected of being disloyal to him left his country desperately unprepared when Germany invaded in June 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quality of Mercy Is Strained: How the Procedures of Sexual Harassment Litigation Against Law Firms Frustrate Both the Substa
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 78 Issue 2 Symposium: Law and Cultural Conflict Article 15 June 2003 The Quality of Mercy Is Strained: How the Procedures of Sexual Harassment Litigation against Law Firms Frustrate Both the Substantive Law of Title VII and the Integration of an Ethic of Care into the Legal Profession Jay Marhoefer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jay Marhoefer, The Quality of Mercy Is Strained: How the Procedures of Sexual Harassment Litigation against Law Firms Frustrate Both the Substantive Law of Title VII and the Integration of an Ethic of Care into the Legal Profession, 78 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 817 (2003). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol78/iss2/15 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE QUALITY OF MERCY IS STRAINED: HOW THE PROCEDURES OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT LITIGATION AGAINST LAW FIRMS FRUSTRATE BOTH THE SUBSTANTIVE LAW OF TITLE VII AND THE INTEGRATION OF AN ETHIC OF CARE INTO THE LEGAL PROFESSION JAY MARHOEFER* INTRODUCTION Mention the term "sexual harassment" to a layperson and a vari- ety of possible responses, some more emotionally charged than others, might ensue. The term incites fear in employers, disgust in feminists, and ambivalence among many in the workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Zen
    ELECTRONIC ZEN: The Alternate Video Generation By Jud Yalkut Copyright, 1984, Jud Yalkut. "The light-flower of heaven and earth fills all the thousand spaces. But also the light-flower of the individual body passes through heaven and covers the earth. Therefore, as soon as the light is circulating, heaven and earth, mountains and rivers, are all circulating with it at the same time. To concentrate the seed-flower of the human body above in the eyes, that is the great key of the human body." - THE SECRET OF THE GOLDEN FLOWER. "Zen Meditation is purely a subjective experience completed by a concentration which holds the inner mind calm, pure and serene. And yet Zen meditation produces a special psychological state based on the changes in the electroencephalogram. Therefore, Zen meditation influences not only the psychic life but also the physiology of the brain." - AKIRA KASAMATSU AND TOMIO HIRAI ("An Electroen- cephalographic Study on the Zen Meditation (Zazen)") in ALTERED STATES OF CONSCIOUSNESS (Charles Tart, editor). "We are not yet aware that telepathy is conveyed through the resonance factors of the mind... The electromagnetic vibration of the head might lead the way to Electronic Zen." - NAM JUNE PAIK. ELECTRONIC ZEN: THE ALTERNATE VIDEO GENERATION PREFACE Although the medium of television has existed in the American home since the post-war period, it has only been since the advent of portable video recorders in the late sixties that a meaningful dissemination of electronics communication technology has permitted the two-way interf low of information and vision exchange. This predominantly half-inch video technology engendered the emergence of alternate video innovators who have gradually mastered the parameters and circuitry of equipment woefully unstable as com pared to the hardware used daily by the vast television broadcasting networks.
    [Show full text]