DOCSLIB.ORG

Ros Hart & Lavinia Milner Bignor Parish Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Joint Community Forum Meeting 28.03.2017 Attending Bepton Parish Council - Ros Hart & Lavinia Milner Bignor Parish Meeting - Arthur K Thomson Boxgrove - Michael Bish & Cllr Henry Potter, Boxgrove Ward Bury Parish Council - Rosemary Trent Cocking Parish Council – David Imlach Compton Parish Council - John Popplewell & Julia Moulton Duncton Parish Council – Peter Thomas Easebourne Parish Council – Carole Moller Elsted and Treyford Parish Council - Andrew Leno & Cllr Andrew Shaxson, Harting Ward Fernhurst Parish Council –Maureen Timms, Bill Black & Cllr Norma Graves, Fernhurst Ward Fittleworth Parish Council – Chris Welfare Funtington Parish Council - Geoff Keech, Nick La Hive & Pippa Jacobs Graffham Parish Council - Sarah Lydiard-Wilson Harting Parish Council - Sheridan Bowman, Chris Healey & Cllr Andrew Shaxson, Harting Ward Heyshott Parish Council - Simon Laking & John Murray Lavant Parish Council - Adrian Blades Lodsworth Parish Council – Caroline Neville Lurgashall Parish Council – Ray Cooper & Peter Wilding Lynchmere Parish Council – Sandie Moore Midhurst Town Council – David Coote Milland Parish Council – Simon Pudge & Jeremy Parker Northchapel Parish Council - Lynda Bell Plaistow & Ifold Parish Council - Cllr Nick Thomas, Plaistow Ward Stedham with Iping Parish Council - Eddie Lintott & Lucy Petrie Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council - Carola Brown West Lavington Parish Council - Tony Jones Westhampnett Parish Council - Sharon Burborough Wisborough Green Parish Council - Jill Sutcliffe & Keith Charman Woolbeding with Redford Parish Council – Adrian Hearle WSCC - Cllr Janet Duncton, Petworth SDNPA - Nat Belderson, Chris Paterson, Lucy Howard, Andrew Lee CDC - Andrew Frost, Amy Loaring, Steve Hansford Apologies John Dwane, Bignor Parish Meeting Ann Tyrrell, Ebernoe Parish Council Sandy Macqueen, Graffham Parish Council Barry Clarke, Marden Parish Meeting Neil Ryder, Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council East Lavington Parish Council Milland Parish Council Stoughton Parish Council Cllr Mike Hall, Ward Member for Lavant Shona Turner, CDC 1. Andrew Shaxson welcomed everyone to the third joint meet of the North East/ North West and extra welcome to those that came from South of the Downs 2. Minutes of the last meeting – no issues arising. 3. South Downs National Park Andrew Lee - South Downs National Park The SDNPA went live on the 1st April 2011 The priorities for the park are: Building the foundation - Have created a Partnership Management Plan & drafting the Local Plan. Landscape, biodiversity & cultural landscapes – o Heathlands Reunited project o Rother & Arun Rivers trust – Changing land management methods o Secrets of the High Woods – looking at archaeology underneath woods Enjoyment & Understanding o Centurion Way extension – next phase to get through the tunnels and to Cocking o South Downs Way – Preserving the path. Tap into organisations that use it to raise money. o Learning and Outreach – Recognised Dark skies reserve. South Downs alphabet. Take the lead campaign. Economy & Community o Farming and Brexit -95% of the park is farming or forestry o Encouraging the farms that work together on conservation issues to work together in light of Brexit o Food and Drink Portal – website hub. Facilitation site to put local suppliers in touch with each other Lucy Howard – Planning Policy Mineral & Waste – Working with WSCC to write a minerals plan which they have just finished consultation upon. It will be submitted to Government in May for Examination. Have agreed that the SDNPA is not suitable for large extraction sites. Local Plan Consultation on pre submission in Autumn. It recommends medium level of development, spread across the villages and towns of the National Park. There is an affordable housing policy 50% on sites of three or more and includes a policy on dark night skies. It also takes into account the 50 Neighbourhood plans in the SDNPA. Chris Paterson – Communities Lead Chris’s job is to be a conduit for communities into the National Park, working with 176 town and parish councils. He helps with: Community Led Planning, which includes, Parish Plans Village Design Statements Neighbourhood plans CAAMP Local Landscape Character Assessment It is really important for area to have plans as it helps with planning development and meeting local needs. Questions Q. Is the SD National Park the second largest English national park in area or the third? A. Neither. A number eg Cairngorms and Snowdonia, Lake District and newly extended Yorkshire Dales, are larger. Q. Will there be improvements to the South Downs Way crossing points? A. Currently working with WSCC highways on this, ensuring that signage isn’t obtrusive. Q. How does developing a Community Land Trust work with the local plan and housing allocation? A. Once a CLT is formed, come and talk to us about possible sites which might be suitable Q. Will SDNP get involved in enforcement; there is currently a ‘black hole’ in communication? A. We have doubled capacity but this is still only two people. Enforcement is part of the s101 agreement between the SDNPA and CDC. We need tangible examples if this is not working. Andrew Frost added that the CDC team is now at full strength. Q. Concerned to see that the mineral plan does not have a hierarchy of energy like earlier documents had. A. The Minerals Plan follows on from the Partnership Management Plan and is a different sort of document. It will not have the same hierarchy of energy as the PMP. Q. What will SDNPA do to improve communication with parishes? A. District Councillors will be added to monthly emailed newsletter list Q. What is the SDNPA approach to equine facilities? A. Hope to have a balanced view as there are widely differing opinions about the impact of these developments. Q. What is the park doing about large extensions; large houses being built and second home ownership? A. This area is still using the relevant 1999 Chichester Local Plan policies. We have a new housing mix policy in the pre-submission plan and a policy on replacement homes. Need to feed the concerns of parish council members about the current proposals into the consultation on the local plan. Q. What’s the stance to applications for mineral extraction outside but on the edge of the park? A. SDNPA would comment and WSCC have a duty to take the national park purpose into account. Q. What are the priorities on permitting mobile phone masts? A. There is a difficult balance between conserving landscape and supporting rural economy Q. A number of extra development sites located in a number of communities have been proposed or changed since the consultation on the Local Plan Preferred Options last autumn. Are you confident that the Pre-submission consultation for soundness currently earmarked for September 2017 will satisfy the criteria for public consultation without producing a separate ‘Site Allocation DPD’? A. Yes. The consultations done on the Issues and Options and Preferred Options plus extra work with the parish and town councils clearly meets the regulations. 4. Future Topics Issues with Local policing Closure of local facilities. State of the roads Large lorries on small roads Large extensions .
Recommended publications
  • [2020] ECC Chi 1 13 February 2020

    [2020] ECC Chi 1 13 February 2020

    Neutral Citation Number: [2020] ECC Chi 1 13 February 2020 In the Consistory Court of the Diocese of Chichester No 1120 In the matter of St Mary, Chithurst And in the matter of the petition of (1) Neil Ryder and (2) Darren Stiles on behalf of Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council Judgment 1. This is at heart a straightforward petition: some may consider it trivial. It concerns a proposal to fell an ash tree. However experience suggests that such proposals can generate strong local feeling as was the case following the delivery of the Court’s judgment in Re St Peter, West Blatchington [2019] ECC Chi 4, which attracted some attention in the local and national press. 2. The petition is dated 26 January 2020 and was received in the registry on 28 January 2020. The petitioners are (1) Mr Neil Ryder and (2) Mr Darren Stiles, who are, respectively the clerk to, and chairman of, Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council. It appears to be common ground that the churchyard of St Mary’s church, Chithurst was closed by Order in Council on 8 August 1901 and that responsibility for its care and maintenance was subsequently passed by the Parochial Church Council (ecclesiastical) to the Parish Council (civil) pursuant to the statutory forerunner of section 215 of the Local Government Act 1972. I have been provided with a copy of the Order in Council but not of the notice of transfer but there seems to be no dispute as to its existence and effect. 3. The first petitioner has raised a number of matters in his written representations to the Court which have required a lengthier judgment than might otherwise have been the case.
  • SUSSEX Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society

    SUSSEX Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society

    Entries in red - require a photograph SUSSEX Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position SX_BRGF18 TQ 218 265 A281 LOWER BEEDING under trees by the road SX_BRPF28 SU 97744 21669 A283 PETWORTH New Street, by "Milestone" cottage in brick boundary wall by gate pillar SX_BRPF29 SU 96337 21837 A272 TILLINGTON Tillington Cottage, 100m E of jct with Upperton Road in stone boundary wall SX_BRPF35 SU 87199 21785 A272 MIDHURST Heathbarn Farm, by Edward Lawrence Studio on grass verge in lay-by barn wall of farm SX_BRPF36 SU 869 218 A272 MIDHURST 400m W of Midhurst Toll House by the road SX_BRPF38 SU 841 223 A272 TROTTON WITH CHITHURST Trotton Common, 50m E of turn to Chithurst in deep hedge SX_CCHV02 SU 825 048 A259 FISHBOURNE Milestone Cottages as gate post on green between old & new roads, 5m from old SX_CCHV03 SU 81085 05321 UC road (was A259) BOSHAM Old Bridge Road; Broadbridge road SX_CCHV05 SU 77863 05494 A259 (was A27) SOUTHBOURNE Chichester Road; Nutbourne, opp. service station on the verge/front garden of "Dover" Gosden Green, E of public footpath, W of "Weston SX_CCHV06 SU 76372 05676 A259 SOUTHBOURNE House" by corner of hedge SX_CCMD01 SU 85845 06783 A286 CHICHESTER between Broadway and the Avenue, opp. Tudor Close on the verge in front of wall to flats SX_CCMD03 SU 85766 08372 A286 CHICHESTER Lavant, by Earl of March PH by car park entrance on grass verge SX_CCMD09 SU 87836 17601 A286 COCKING Milestone Garage edge of forecourt at corner of canopy SX_CCMD12 SU 88906
  • Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council to the LGCBE Draft Recommendations for Chichester District

    Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council to the LGCBE Draft Recommendations for Chichester District

    “Steps”, Trotton, Nr Petersfield, West Sussex, GU31 5JS Response by Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council to the LGCBE Draft Recommendations for Chichester District Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council considered the draft recommendations at a meeting held on Wednesday 14th. September 2016. We are delighted that the proposal to move Trotton from Harting ward was rejected. However, we continue to have grave concerns regarding the proposal to move Elsted and Treyford Parish from Harting ward to Midhurst ward. Our response to the initial consultation included four points relating directly to Elsted parish, and we would repeat and strengthen these here: 1. Trotton no longer has a school, shop, village green, sports ground, village hall or public house and must rely on its neighbours' facilities. Our population centre (albeit a small one) is situated to the south of our parish, about a mile from the public house at Lower Elsted, which hosts events for Trotton residents each month. The Village hall and sports ground at Elsted give a good view across Trotton and are often used by Trotton residents. Trotton and Elsted Parishes are similar in size and nature and the two Parish councils have recently been exploring options for closer working, including the potential for a Common Parish Council. We have strong links to Elsted, which in turn has strong links with Harting Parish. 2. Like our neighbours in Elsted parish, Trotton also has strong links to its larger neighbour Rogate as the two parishes share a Rector across the four churches which make up the United Benefice. Given the small size and sparse facilities of our parish, we also value our links with Rogate for its school and for allowing us to combine with them for celebrations such as the recent Queen’s birthday.
  • Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council

    Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council

    Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Chichester District Personal Details: Name: DARREN STILES E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council Comment text: Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council Clerk Chairman Mrs Carola Brown, M.D Ballards Brewery Ltd The Old Sawmill Nyewood Nr Petersfield GU31 5HA Electoral Review of Chichester District by the LGCBE. A response by Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council to the consultation document issued by Chichester District Council (CDC). Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council have read and considered the proposals for amended boundaries as suggested by CDC and support the inclusion of Trotton with Chithurst Parish within the Harting Ward, including Rogate and Elsted parishes. Our specific response to Question 11 of the CDC document is: Trotton no longer has a school, shop, village green, sports ground, village hall or public house and must rely on its neighbours' facilities. Our population centre (albeit a small one) is situated to the south of the parish, about a mile from the public house at Lower Elsted, which hosts events for Trotton residents each month. The Village hall and sports ground at Elsted give a good view across Trotton and are often used by Trotton residents. Trotton and Elsted Parishes are similar in size and nature and the two Parish councils have recently been exploring options for closer working, including the potential for a Common Parish Council. We have strong links to Elsted, which in turn has strong links with Harting Parish. Trotton also has strong links to its larger neighbour Rogate as the two parishes share a Rector across the four churches which make up the United Benefice.
  • Current Animal Licences Held 5 February 2020

    Current Animal Licences Held 5 February 2020

    CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL - Current Animal Licences Held 5th February 2020 Animal Boarding Animal Boarding (1 to 25 animals) Parish: Linchmere Ward: Fernhurst Date of Issue : 27-Sep-19 Trading As : Chums Address : Woodend Cottage Gillhams Lane Linchmere Haslemere West Email [email protected] Business Tel Animal Boarding (26 to 75 animals) Animal Boarding (75+ animals) Parish: Linch Ward: Fernhurst Date of Issue : 4-Jan-2019 Trading As : Just Cats Address : Just Cats Iron Hill Farm Hollycombe Lane Linch Liphook West Email [email protected] Business Tel Parish: Westbourne Ward: Westbourne Date of Issue : 21-Dec-18 Trading As : Amberley Kennels Ltd Address : Amberley Kennels Limited Woodmancote Lane Woodmancote Email [email protected] Business Tel Home Boarding (up to 6 animals) Parish: Special Code For BLPUs Outside CDC Area Ward: Special Code For BLPUs Outside District Date of Issue : 12-Jul-19 Trading As : Scamps and Champs Address : 80 Longfield Avenue Fareham PO14 1JR Email [email protected] Business Tel Parish: Midhurst Ward: Midhurst Date of Issue : 16-Jan-19 Trading As : Dog Vision Address : 19 Elmleigh Midhurst West Sussex GU29 9EZ Email [email protected] Business Tel Parish: East Wittering And Bracklesham Ward: The Witterings Date of Issue : 02-Jan-19 Trading As : Lisa's Dog Walking And Boarding Address : 4 Bracklesham Close Bracklesham Chichester West Sussex Email [email protected] Business Tel Parish: Rogate Ward: Harting Date of Issue : 29-Jan-19 Trading As : Allywags
  • Heathlands Reunited - Project Sites

    Heathlands Reunited - Project Sites

    Kingsley Common [MoD] Heathlands Reunited - Project Sites Broxhead Common (East) [HCC] Broxhead Common (West) [ARCT] SiteName Source Partner Site_ID Parish Blackmoor Sites_of_Special_Scientific_Interest_SSSIs_42 ARCT Blackmoor Whitehill Shortheath Broxhead Common (West) Special_Protection_Areas_SPAs_46 ARCT Broxhead Common Whitehill Common Weavers Down (East) Digitised using Google Earth screenshots and OS base ARCT Weavers Down (East) Bramshott and Liphook [HCC] Weavers Down (West) Digitised using Google Earth screenshots and OS base ARCT Weavers Down (West) Whitehill; (Bramshott and Liphook) Bordon Woolmer Forest Digitised using Google Earth screenshots and OS base ARCT Woolmer Forest Whitehill [Whitehill Woolmer Forest Digitised using Google Earth screenshots and OS base ARCT Woolmer Forest Whitehill Town Council] Lord's Piece Lords Piece.png digitised usign OSMM Barlavington Estate Lord's Piece Sutton; Bury; (Fittleworth) Coldharbour Wood Forestry_Commission_Legal_Boundary_45 Forestry Commission Coldharbour Wood Rogate The Slab Combe Hill Forestry_Commission_Legal_Boundary_45 Forestry Commission Combe Hill Rogate (North) [MoD] Hambledon Piece Forestry_Commission_Legal_Boundary_45 Forestry Commission Hambledon Piece Rogate The Warren, Iron Hill Forestry_Commission_Legal_Boundary_45 Forestry Commission Iron Hill Linch; (Fernhurst) Shufflesheeps Forestry_Commission_Legal_Boundary_45 Forestry Commission Shufflesheeps Milland Selborne Ludshott [MoD] Common Tullecombe Tullecombe.png digitised from OSMM Forestry Commission Tullecombe Rogate
  • Public Rights of Way Inspection Areas

    Public Rights of Way Inspection Areas

    Worth Crawley East Grinstead Rusper Ashurst Wood Turners Hill Warnham North Horsham Rudgwick Colgate West Hoathly Slinfold Linchmere Plaistow Slaugham Loxwood Broadbridge HeathHorsham Balcombe Northchapel Ardingly Linch Lurgashall Itchingfield Horsted Keynes Fernhurst Lower Beeding Milland Southwater Ebernoe Nuthurst Kirdford Ansty and Staplefield Billingshurst Rogate Wisborough Green Lindfield Cuckfield Woolbeding with Redford Lodsworth Haywards Heath Lindfield Rural Bolney Trotton with Chithurst Easebourne Shipley Tillington Cowfold Stedham with Iping Petworth Midhurst West Lavington Fittleworth Pulborough West Chiltington West Grinstead Twineham Harting Stopham Shermanbury Elsted and Treyford Burgess Hill Heyshott Bepton Thakeham Hurstpierpoint and Sayers Common East LavingtonDuncton Cocking Coldwaltham Graffham Barlavington Ashington Ashurst Albourne Henfield Hassocks Woodmancote Bury Marden Sutton Parham Wiston 1 - Katherine Eels Compton Bignor Singleton Storrington and Sullington West Dean Upwaltham East Dean Washington 2 - Katrina Harper Amberley Steyning Poynings Pyecombe Newtimber Houghton Fulking Upper Beeding Stoughton Madehurst 3 - Darryl Hobden (until 1/3/17) Slindon Burpham Bramber South Stoke Findon Lavant Boxgrove Eartham Funtington Westhampnett Patching 4 - Vacant Westbourne Coombes Arundel Warningcamp Clapham Sompting Shoreham/Southwick Tangmere Walberton Lyminster and Crossbush Southbourne 5 - Nigel Bird Chichester AldingbourneEastergate Poling Angmering Lancing Fishbourne Worthing Oving Chidham and Hambrook Ford Littlehampton
  • 1 Local Background 2 the Consultation Process

    1 Local Background 2 the Consultation Process

    RESPONSE FROM TROTTON WITH CHITHURST PARISH COUNCIL TO THE WSCC CONSULTATION ON “PROPOSED REORGANISATION OF RURAL AND SMALL SCHOOLS IN WEST SUSSEX” Responding organisation: Trotton with Chithurst parish council, Steps, Trotton, W Sussex, GU31 5EP Responding as: Parish council representing residents within Stedham catchment area 1 Local background 1.1 We are one of the two parish councils within the catchment area of Stedham primary school (the other is Stedham with Iping). 1.2 Stedham Primary is 1.4 miles from the nearest boundary of our parish; Rogate C of E primary school is 1.2 miles from our nearest boundary, and Rake, Harting, Hollycombe, Compton, Midhurst and Easebourne primaries are all within 10 miles. 1.3 Stedham and Hollycombe are the only two of these schools that are not C of E “voluntary controlled schools”. 1.4 We have not been able to obtain figures on how many children from our parish attend each of the local primary schools and, if this consultation leads to any formal consultations on school closures or reorganisations, we will ask for this information (by FOI request if necessary) in order to assess the importance of the changes to our residents. We believe, however, that the numbers of our residents going to Stedham, Rogate and Harting schools are approximately equal. We also have past pupils and parents, current or recent employees, volunteers and/or governors of at all 3 schools living in the parish. 1.5 We support the key elements of the WSCC “School effectiveness strategy” (including the school organisation strategy) and particularly the aim to “secure the very best start in life for all children and young people in” [our parish].
  • West Sussex County Council Attachments: UA Report Appendix 2 Consultation Response.Docx

    West Sussex County Council Attachments: UA Report Appendix 2 Consultation Response.Docx

    Kingsley, Paul From: Charles Gauntlett > Sent: 10 March 2016 14:04 To: Philip Coleman Cc: reviews Subject: Chichester District Council Boundary Review - Comments from West Sussex County Council Attachments: UA report appendix 2 consultation response.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear Philip, The County Council has considered Chichester District Council’s work on its electoral boundary review. It has focussed on Chichester District Council’s proposed scheme and has answered the questions in the consultation document. The County Council also makes a general comment about how it hopes that the Commission may adopt whole county reviews in future, if the pilot in East Sussex is successful, to give more chance of having better levels of co-terminosity between a county and districts. Kind regards, Charles Charles Gauntlett | Senior Advisor – Council and Member Support, West Sussex County Council | Location: This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the persons addressed. If it has come to you in error please reply to advise us but you should not read it, copy it, show it to anyone else nor make any other use of its content. West Sussex County Council takes steps to ensure emails and attachments are virus-free but you should carry out your own checks before opening any attachment. 1 Response to Boundary Review Consultation from West Sussex County Council West Sussex County Council has considered Chichester District Council’s Electoral Review 2016 Consultation Document and has agreed the following response to the consultation questions and also made some general comments regarding the proposals.
  • MINUTES of a VIRTUAL PARISH COUNCIL MEETING Held On

    MINUTES of a VIRTUAL PARISH COUNCIL MEETING Held On

    MINUTES OF A VIRTUAL PARISH COUNCIL MEETING held on Wednesday, 10th February, 2020 commencing at 18:00hrs Present: Carola Brown, Chris Cullen, Dave Dawtrey, Colleen Homan, Neil Ryder, Anne Stephens Also attending: Kate O’Kelly (CDC and WSCC member); 3 members of the public 1. Apologies for absence: Kathryn McKellar 2. Disclosure of Interests To receive any disclosure by members of personal interests in matters on the agenda. 3. Public questions Members of the public were invited to speak under the appropriate agenda items 4. Minutes from the council meeting held on 13th January 2021. a. The minutes were approved. b. Following the appeal by the Ramblers Association to investigate “lost” paths, CH reported back on the ownership of the track off Terwick Lane. It was agreed that this item should be added to the agenda for the next meeting. c. CB had liaised with the Office for National Census and said the PC would hear when help was needed. d. CB had not managed to contact WSCC regarding Operation Watershed but would attempt to do so before the next meeting. 5. Reports from district and county councillors. KOK had circulated her reports (see appendix). 6. Council membership a. Co-options of new member: Anne Stephens was the only nominee and was duly co-opted to the council b. Allocation of responsibilities: The following responsibilities were agreed: Events – AS; Open spaces / PROW / environment – CC; Emergency plan - CH 7. Complaint: re leylandii hedge at Terwick Mill House – overhang on neighbour’s garden. Councillors urged informal, neighbourly solutions rather than formal complaints.
  • Consultation Response to Chichester District Council's Electoral

    Consultation Response to Chichester District Council's Electoral

    Appendix 2 Response to Boundary Review Consultation from West Sussex County Council West Sussex County Council has considered Chichester District Council’s Electoral Review 2016 Consultation Document and has agreed the following response to the consultation questions and also made some general comments regarding the proposals. Question 1: We agree that Shopwhyke Lakes should be included in Oving ward. Question 2: We agree that Chichester City should be dealt with as a separate unit and that district ward boundaries should not cross the city boundary. Question 3: Our preference is for option 2, with a single-member ward for Sidlesham (comprising the village and the northern edge of Selsey) and a three- member ward for the core community of Selsey. The proposed County Council division puts Sidlesham in with the Witterings, so it will be better for a single member Sidlesham district ward to be 100% within the County Wtterings division. Question 5: On balance, our preference is for option 2. We acknowledge that whilst the western end of East Wittering/Bracklesham Bay is within West Wittering Parish, residents are oriented to the community facilities of East Wittering. Question 6: No view Question 7: In general, we have a preference for single member wards; however we recognise in this case that owing to the variance a two-member ward is preferable. Question 8: In our view, either option is preferable to a ward that is over 15% above the norm. On balance, our preference is for option 1, as this would keep the defined community of Fishbourne intact. Question 9: our preference is for Westbourne as the ward name.
  • Joint Meeting NW and NE Com. Forums

    Joint Meeting NW and NE Com. Forums

    JOINT MEETING OF THE NORTH WEST AND NORTH EAST COMMUNITY FORUMS Minutes of a meeting of the Community Forum held on Tuesday, 5th April 2016, Lodsworth Village Hall at 7pm. Attendance and Apologies (in italics): Bepton Parish Council Alex Cunningham and Ros Hart Bignor Parish Meeting John Dwane Bury Parish Council Apologies sent Cocking Parish Council David Imlach Duncton Parish Council Easebourne Parish Council Stephen Lloyd East Lavington Parish Council Michael Harting Ebernoe Parish Council Apologies sent Elsted and Treyford Parish Council Andrew Leno John Smith, Maureen Timms, Bill Black and Fernhurst Parish Council Heather Bicknell Fittleworth Parish Council David Brittain Graffham Parish Council Harting Parish Council Andrew Shaxson Heyshott Parish Council Simon Laking Kirdford Parish Council Linch Parish Meeting Apologies sent Lodsworth Parish Council Deryck Hamon Loxwood Parish Council Chris Agar Anthea Martin-Jenkins, Joe Harden, Ray Lurgashall Parish Council Cooper and Andy Tate Lynchmere Parish Council Norma Graves and Sandy Moore Midhurst Town Council Mark Purves and Stephen Morley Milland Parish Council Simon Pudge Northchapel Parish Council Apologies sent Gaye Jordan Petworth Town Council Chris Kemp Plaistow & Ifold Parish Council Apologies sent Rogate Parish Council Elizabeth Brown Stedham with Iping Parish Council Lucy Petrie and Eddie Lintott Stopham Parish Meeting The Common Parish of Sutton & Apologies sent Barlavington Tillington Parish Council Apologies sent Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council 1 West Lavington Parish Council Keith Elmy Wisborough Green Parish Council Peter Drummond Woolbeding with Redford Parish Council Sussex Police Mrs Katy Bourne and Justin Burtenshaw West Sussex County Council Janet Duncton Shona Turner and Andrew Frost Chichester District Council Apologies sent Eileen Lintill and John Elliot 1.