MINUTES of a VIRTUAL PARISH COUNCIL MEETING Held On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MINUTES of a VIRTUAL PARISH COUNCIL MEETING Held On MINUTES OF A VIRTUAL PARISH COUNCIL MEETING held on Wednesday, 10th February, 2020 commencing at 18:00hrs Present: Carola Brown, Chris Cullen, Dave Dawtrey, Colleen Homan, Neil Ryder, Anne Stephens Also attending: Kate O’Kelly (CDC and WSCC member); 3 members of the public 1. Apologies for absence: Kathryn McKellar 2. Disclosure of Interests To receive any disclosure by members of personal interests in matters on the agenda. 3. Public questions Members of the public were invited to speak under the appropriate agenda items 4. Minutes from the council meeting held on 13th January 2021. a. The minutes were approved. b. Following the appeal by the Ramblers Association to investigate “lost” paths, CH reported back on the ownership of the track off Terwick Lane. It was agreed that this item should be added to the agenda for the next meeting. c. CB had liaised with the Office for National Census and said the PC would hear when help was needed. d. CB had not managed to contact WSCC regarding Operation Watershed but would attempt to do so before the next meeting. 5. Reports from district and county councillors. KOK had circulated her reports (see appendix). 6. Council membership a. Co-options of new member: Anne Stephens was the only nominee and was duly co-opted to the council b. Allocation of responsibilities: The following responsibilities were agreed: Events – AS; Open spaces / PROW / environment – CC; Emergency plan - CH 7. Complaint: re leylandii hedge at Terwick Mill House – overhang on neighbour’s garden. Councillors urged informal, neighbourly solutions rather than formal complaints. After some discussion it was agreed that Mr Jobs would meet DD at the neighbour’s garden and discuss what could be done 8. Planning application SDNP/20/05627/FUL a. Address: Clarefield Copse, Dumpford Lane, GU31 5JL b. Proposal: 11 hectare campsite c. Decision: Object on the grounds of safety and lack of access 9. Planning application SDNP/21/00277/HOUS/LIS a. Address: Terwick Mill House, 1 Mill Lane, GU31 5JT b. Proposal: Alterations to existing ancillary building to form studio/gym. c. Deadline: Note that applicant had offered changes to accommodate neighbour’s privacy; Suggest that permanent restriction be placed against commercial residential use. 10. Finance: Payment of £122.22 for expenses for Chithurst churchyard gate was approved. Members asked the clerk to thank Steven Hann sincerely for making an excellent replacement gate for only the cost of some materials. 11. Consultations etc a. Schools – members agreed that NR should draft a letter of support to be signed by DD b. White Horse pub – NR gave an update on the project: the valuation report from the Plunkett Foundation consultant had been received; a report had been circulated on the 280+ responses to the residents’ survey; a business planning group was being established to see if a viable bid could be mounted. 12. Information for councillors that are considered urgent or to be included on future agenda. Date of next meeting: 10th March 2021 Reference Who Action By when 20210113-9a CB Seek WSCC assistance re Op Watershed contract 3 Mar 20210113-9c NR / DD Provide trees for Chithurst graveyard ASAP 20210210-7 DD Meet T Jobs at neighbour’s garden to discuss hedge ASAP 20210210-11a NR Draft letter of support on DVSF school federation consultation ASAP 11 February 2021 Minutes20210210_pc.docx Page 1 of 2 APPENDIX: County and district councillor reports County Councillor 1. Covid data Latest data – 1795 new cases in West Sussex for the 7 days up to 4th Feb 212 new cases in Chichester District – 175/ 100000 2. COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout As of Friday – 94% of the over 80s in the North of the Chichester District had been vaccinated, and 92% of 70-79 year olds, overall 302,000 vaccinations have been done in West Sussex. CDC is working closely with local NHS colleagues and is sharing regular information on their progress. They are currently exploring alternative (i.e. Chichester) sites that could be used. Identifying and then getting a site approved is complex and has to be approved by NHS England, but they hope to be in a position to update us on this very soon. One of the reasons why some sites were not considered in the first instance is because they were not available to use in the long term. However, the current lockdown has changed this and this has provided the NHS with further options. CDC are sharing NHS updates here: www.chichester.gov.uk/covidresidentsupport I have started vaccinating – currently doing shifts at the Selsey centre, (today we were starting to vaccinate the 65 to 70 cohort), hoping to be starting to join the team at Riverbank soon. 3. WSCC Budget decisions: Options still on the table. Closure of child and family centres including Petworth – a concern for rural North Chichester area, and youth drop in centres. Budget to be finalised at full council this Friday. The Lib Dem group amendments include keeping the children and family centres and the day centres open at least until the pandemic is over and we can review the need and the community based alternatives, more support for mental health in schools and increased staffing resource in the walking and cycling team. 4. Health and Adults scrutiny committee - January 2021 We scrutinised the plan for Adults and Health service planning overview. Savings options all being considered. Review of in-house residential services – closure of Marjorie Cobby House in Selsey used as post discharge short term beds. Review of Shaw day services – underused but during Covid this is understandable. Reduction in well-being programme. Programme underspent and disrupted during Covid. The committee was of a view that reducing support for prevention of physical and mental health at this time is short sighted District Councillor 5. COVID-19 Business Support: New grant schemes are open for applications from eligible retail, hospitality and leisure business in the Chichester District. Visit the website to see if you are eligible and to apply: www.chichester.gov.uk/covidbusinesssupport 6. Year of culture -2022 CDC are planning a special programme of events for 2022 to celebrate and showcase the outstanding range of arts and culture on offer across the district. 7. Tree planting: CDC have been chosen as one of five local authorities in England to take part in a new £2.5m tree planting project with the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), which aims to increase tree cover in rural and urban areas. The scheme will make trees and funding available to individuals, homeowners, schools, community groups, private landowners and tenant farmers. You can find out more here: https://www.chichester.gov.uk/article/34875/New-tree-planting-pilot- scheme-launched-in-the-Chichester-District 8. Corporate Governance & Audit Committee An increased focus on Environment, Social and Governance issues in corporate investments has been agreed. Thanks to health (pre-COVID) reserves, CDC has more room to manoeuvre than many other Local Authorities but there will be some difficult spending decisions to be made in the years ahead. 11 February 2021 Minutes20210210_pc.docx Page 2 of 2 .
Recommended publications
  • Supplement to Agenda Agenda Supplement for Cabinet, 04/10
    Public Document Pack JOHN WARD East Pallant House Head of Finance and Governance Services 1 East Pallant Chichester Contact: Graham Thrussell on 01243 534653 West Sussex Email: [email protected] PO19 1TY Tel: 01243 785166 www.chichester.gov.uk A meeting of Cabinet will be held in Committee Room 1 at East Pallant House Chichester on Tuesday 4 October 2016 at 09:30 MEMBERS: Mr A Dignum (Chairman), Mrs E Lintill (Vice-Chairman), Mr R Barrow, Mr B Finch, Mrs P Hardwick, Mrs G Keegan and Mrs S Taylor SUPPLEMENT TO THE AGENDA 9 Review of Character Appraisal and Management Proposals for Selsey Conservations Area and Implementation of Associated Recommendations Including Designation of a New Conservation Area in East Selsey to be Named Old Selsey (pages 1 to 12) In section 14 of the report for this agenda item lists three background papers: (1) Former Executive Board Report on Conservation Areas: Current Progress on Character Appraisals, Article 4 Directions and programme for future work - 8 September 2009 (in the public domain). (2) Representation form Selsey Town Council asking Chichester District Council to de-designate the Selsey conservation area (3) Selsey Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Proposals January 2007 (in the public domain). These papers are available to view as follows: (1) is attached herewith (2) has been published as part of the agenda papers for this meeting (3) is available on Chichester District Council’s website via this link: http://www.chichester.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=5298&p=0 http://www.chichester.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=5299&p=0 Agenda Item 9 Agenda Item no: 8 Chichester District Council Executive Board Tuesday 8th September 2009 Conservation Areas: Current Progress on Character Appraisals, Article 4 Directions and programme for future work 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletterspring | 2015
    Nursing care at home for local children with life-threatening or SPRING | 2015 Newsletter terminal illnesses and support for their families Trekking the Te Araroa Trail for Snowdrop As I write this I'm sitting in the kitchen Whenever I tell other hikers or people So why spend the best part of six of a campsite in Twizel, a small town here who are familiar with the Te Araroa months putting myself through this? near the centre of the South Island in that this is my first ever hike it always Well, despite the difficulties I've pretty New Zealand. Yesterday fellow hiker illicits the same response - which much loved almost every minute of it. Rob and myself walked 40 kilometres is to look at me like I'm crazy. It's However, my main motivation, since the an incredibly physical and mentally early stages of planning this adventure (25 miles) in the hot sun around Lake demanding trail has been to raise Pukaki with its glorious sky-blue water and is, without money for The reflecting the majestic snow covered doubt, the hardest Quinn was a lively little Sussex Snowdrop peak of Mount Cook, the highest challenge I've ever “ Trust. mountain in New Zealand. I've been undertaken. I've guy who loved to kick It is almost 5 years suffered many walking the Te Araroa now for almost a football around, he ago since my blisters, aching four and a half months and the stunning nephew, Quinn feet, back pain, enjoyed watching ‘Antz’, vistas and beautiful, varied Mills, passed knee pain, shoulder landscapes continue to away after being pain, wasp stings, pointing at birds in the diagnosed at the amaze me.
    [Show full text]
  • Selsey NP Decision Statement July 2020
    F11f Chichester District Council Chichester District Council Local Planning Authority Selsey Neighbourhood Plan 2014 - 2029 DECISION STATEMENT 1. Introduction 1.1 Under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended), the Council has a statutory duty to assist communities in the preparation of Neighbourhood Plans and Orders and to take plans through a process of examination, referendum and adoption. The Localism Act 2011 (Part 6 Chapter 3) sets out the local planning authority’s responsibilities for Neighbourhood Planning. 1.2 This report confirms that the modifications proposed in the examiner’s report have been accepted, the draft Selsey Neighbourhood Plan has been altered as a result of it and that this plan may now proceed to referendum. 2. Background 2.1 The Selsey Neighbourhood Development Plan relates to the area that was designated by Chichester District Council as a neighbourhood area on 4 December 2012. This area is coterminous with the Selsey Town Council boundary that lies within the Chichester District Council local planning authority area. 2.2 Following the submission of the Selsey Neighbourhood Plan to the Council, the plan was publicised and representations were invited. The publicity period ended on 23 March 2018. 2.3 Mr John Slater was appointed by Chichester District Council, with the consent of Selsey Town Council, to undertake the examination of the Selsey Neighbourhood Development Plan and to prepare a report of the independent examination. 2.4 The examiner’s report concludes that, subject to making modifications recommended by the examiner, the Plan meets the basic conditions set out in the legislation and should proceed to a Neighbourhood Plan referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Applications for Selsey Parish
    Planning Applications for Selsey Parish – Weeks 23,24 & 25 Week 23 SY/20/01100/DOM Rossall 2 Chichester Way Selsey PO20 0PJ Rear single storey extension to square the rear of the building, to create a utility room to the rear of the kitchen https://publicaccess.chichester.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=Q9LWGJERIR400 SY/20/01110/FUL Mr Paul Kiff Police House 27 Chichester Road Selsey PO20 0NB Demolition of existing vacant dwelling, attached office building and 2 no. blocks of 6 no. garages and the construction of 4 no. dwellings and 8 no. parking spaces https://publicaccess.chichester.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=Q9NQDNERISK00 SY/20/01227/DOM Mr And Mrs S Bow 120 Gainsborough Drive Selsey Chichester West Sussex Two storey side and single storey rear extension https://publicaccess.chichester.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=QAKIHUER0UX00 Week 24 SY/20/01212/DOM Mr And Mrs Turner 1 Orpen Place Selsey Chichester West Sussex Proposed conservatory to north elevation. https://publicaccess.chichester.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=QADO1RER0SR00 SY/20/01243/PLD Mr Raymond Martin Gates At South East End Of Park Road Selsey West Sussex Proposed lawful development installation of traffic calming gate, less than 1m high and associated hinged support and closing posts. https://publicaccess.chichester.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=QAMIU1ER0YN00 Week 25 SY/20/01213/LBC Mr Nicholas Rose West Street House 32 West Street Selsey PO20 9AB Remove front flint/stone/brick wall and replace with restored wall using existing and recycled materials.
    [Show full text]
  • [2020] ECC Chi 1 13 February 2020
    Neutral Citation Number: [2020] ECC Chi 1 13 February 2020 In the Consistory Court of the Diocese of Chichester No 1120 In the matter of St Mary, Chithurst And in the matter of the petition of (1) Neil Ryder and (2) Darren Stiles on behalf of Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council Judgment 1. This is at heart a straightforward petition: some may consider it trivial. It concerns a proposal to fell an ash tree. However experience suggests that such proposals can generate strong local feeling as was the case following the delivery of the Court’s judgment in Re St Peter, West Blatchington [2019] ECC Chi 4, which attracted some attention in the local and national press. 2. The petition is dated 26 January 2020 and was received in the registry on 28 January 2020. The petitioners are (1) Mr Neil Ryder and (2) Mr Darren Stiles, who are, respectively the clerk to, and chairman of, Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council. It appears to be common ground that the churchyard of St Mary’s church, Chithurst was closed by Order in Council on 8 August 1901 and that responsibility for its care and maintenance was subsequently passed by the Parochial Church Council (ecclesiastical) to the Parish Council (civil) pursuant to the statutory forerunner of section 215 of the Local Government Act 1972. I have been provided with a copy of the Order in Council but not of the notice of transfer but there seems to be no dispute as to its existence and effect. 3. The first petitioner has raised a number of matters in his written representations to the Court which have required a lengthier judgment than might otherwise have been the case.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSSEX Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society
    Entries in red - require a photograph SUSSEX Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position SX_BRGF18 TQ 218 265 A281 LOWER BEEDING under trees by the road SX_BRPF28 SU 97744 21669 A283 PETWORTH New Street, by "Milestone" cottage in brick boundary wall by gate pillar SX_BRPF29 SU 96337 21837 A272 TILLINGTON Tillington Cottage, 100m E of jct with Upperton Road in stone boundary wall SX_BRPF35 SU 87199 21785 A272 MIDHURST Heathbarn Farm, by Edward Lawrence Studio on grass verge in lay-by barn wall of farm SX_BRPF36 SU 869 218 A272 MIDHURST 400m W of Midhurst Toll House by the road SX_BRPF38 SU 841 223 A272 TROTTON WITH CHITHURST Trotton Common, 50m E of turn to Chithurst in deep hedge SX_CCHV02 SU 825 048 A259 FISHBOURNE Milestone Cottages as gate post on green between old & new roads, 5m from old SX_CCHV03 SU 81085 05321 UC road (was A259) BOSHAM Old Bridge Road; Broadbridge road SX_CCHV05 SU 77863 05494 A259 (was A27) SOUTHBOURNE Chichester Road; Nutbourne, opp. service station on the verge/front garden of "Dover" Gosden Green, E of public footpath, W of "Weston SX_CCHV06 SU 76372 05676 A259 SOUTHBOURNE House" by corner of hedge SX_CCMD01 SU 85845 06783 A286 CHICHESTER between Broadway and the Avenue, opp. Tudor Close on the verge in front of wall to flats SX_CCMD03 SU 85766 08372 A286 CHICHESTER Lavant, by Earl of March PH by car park entrance on grass verge SX_CCMD09 SU 87836 17601 A286 COCKING Milestone Garage edge of forecourt at corner of canopy SX_CCMD12 SU 88906
    [Show full text]
  • Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council to the LGCBE Draft Recommendations for Chichester District
    “Steps”, Trotton, Nr Petersfield, West Sussex, GU31 5JS Response by Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council to the LGCBE Draft Recommendations for Chichester District Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council considered the draft recommendations at a meeting held on Wednesday 14th. September 2016. We are delighted that the proposal to move Trotton from Harting ward was rejected. However, we continue to have grave concerns regarding the proposal to move Elsted and Treyford Parish from Harting ward to Midhurst ward. Our response to the initial consultation included four points relating directly to Elsted parish, and we would repeat and strengthen these here: 1. Trotton no longer has a school, shop, village green, sports ground, village hall or public house and must rely on its neighbours' facilities. Our population centre (albeit a small one) is situated to the south of our parish, about a mile from the public house at Lower Elsted, which hosts events for Trotton residents each month. The Village hall and sports ground at Elsted give a good view across Trotton and are often used by Trotton residents. Trotton and Elsted Parishes are similar in size and nature and the two Parish councils have recently been exploring options for closer working, including the potential for a Common Parish Council. We have strong links to Elsted, which in turn has strong links with Harting Parish. 2. Like our neighbours in Elsted parish, Trotton also has strong links to its larger neighbour Rogate as the two parishes share a Rector across the four churches which make up the United Benefice. Given the small size and sparse facilities of our parish, we also value our links with Rogate for its school and for allowing us to combine with them for celebrations such as the recent Queen’s birthday.
    [Show full text]
  • Selsey Neighbourhood Plan
    SELSEY NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2017 ANNEX A – HISTORY, DESIGN AND GUIDANCE – BACKGROUND EVIDENCE WWW.SELSEYTOWNCOUNCIL.GOV.UK TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 LOCALISM AND COMMUNITY NEED 3 SELSEY GROWTH 1086 - 2013 SELSEY NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2016 4 DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES 6 SELSEY 2029 8 ENVIRONMENT AND COUNTRYSIDE SUSTAINABILITY 10 11 SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT - CLIMATE 13 SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT - ENERGY 15 SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT - INFRASTRUCTURE 17 SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT - TRANSPORT 20 SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY 21 SUSTAINABLE SOCIETY DESIGN GUIDANCE 27 CONTEXT AND CHARACTER 29 DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS 31 LOCAL DESIGN AND PLANNING GUIDANCE 43 NON-PLANNING OBJECTIVES APPENDICES 44 APPENDIX I - SELSEY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS 47 APPENDIX II - CONSULTATIONS 48 REFERENCES 1 INTRODUCTION The Localism Bill introduced by Eric Pickles MP in 2011 devolved powers previously held by central government to local authorities. Local communities now have a greater influence over the way their neighbourhoods are developed, placing community need at its heart, along with co-operation with developers and local authorities. In addition to a number of policy changes, one of the most significant is the way the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) is applied through the involvement of local communities and a presumption in favour of sustainable developments in line with community need. The removal of the regional tier with the abolition of regional spatial strategies (RSS), local planning policy has become essential. Communities defined by parish or geography have been encouraged to develop their own neighbourhood plans, to provide an informed and contextual framework to determine future development, whilst conforming to strategic and local policies. Through the development of neighbourhood plans, it is essential to give the community every opportunity to contribute their thoughts and to comment on any proposed developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Chichester District Council Planning Committee Wednesday 6 January
    Chichester District Council Planning Committee Wednesday 6 January 2021 Declarations of Interests Details of members’ personal interests arising from their membership of parish councils or West Sussex County Council or from their being Chichester District Council or West Sussex County Council appointees to outside organisations or members of outside bodies or from being employees of such organisations or bodies are set out in the attached agenda report. The interests therein are disclosed by each member in respect of planning applications or other items in the agenda which require a decision where the council or outside body concerned has been consulted in respect of that particular planning application or item. Declarations of disclosable pecuniary interests, personal interests, prejudicial interests or predetermination or bias are to be made by members of the Planning Committee or other members who are present in respect of matters on the agenda or this meeting. Personal Interests - Membership of Parish Councils The following members of the Planning Committee declare a personal interest by way of their membership of the parish councils stated below in respect of the items on the schedule of planning applications where their respective parish councils have been consulted: Mr H C Potter – Boxgrove Parish Council (BG) Rev J-H Bowden – Chichester City Council (CC) Mr R E Plowman – Chichester City Council (CC) Mrs S M Sharp – Chichester City Council (CC) Mr P J H Wilding – Lurgashall Parish Council (LG) Mr G V McAra - Midhurst Town
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Recharge in Sussex & East Kent
    BEACH RECHARGE IN SUSSEX & EAST KENT: A PRELIMINARY INVENTORY & OVERVIEW Compiled by R. Williams, edited by C. Moses. Not to be quoted without permission 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 2 Inventory of beach recharge schemes ..............................................................................5 3 Notes and sources ............................................................................................................9 4 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................17 5 References......................................................................................................................21 1 Introduction Sand and shingle are being lost from many beaches in Sussex and Kent as a result of natural coastal processes as well as ill-designed sea defence and coastal protection schemes. To counteract falling beach levels, the Environment Agency and local authorities are increasingly resorting to “topping-up” the beaches with additional sand and shingle. Several terms are currently employed to refer to the artificial provision of extra beach material, but there is disagreement about their precise definition. For the purpose of this report, beach nourishment (or beach replenishment) is defined as the supply of material that has been dredged from the seabed or extracted from inland sand and gravel pits. Beach recycling is defined as the removal
    [Show full text]
  • Chichester District Council the COUNCIL 24 July 2018 Selsey And
    Chichester District Council THE COUNCIL 24 July 2018 Selsey and Midhurst Visions 1. Contacts Report Author: Tania Murphy – Divisional Manager Place Telephone: 01243 534701 E-mail: [email protected] Cabinet Member: Tony Dignum – Leader of the Council Telephone: 01243 538585 E-mail: [email protected] 2. Recommendation That the Council approves the release of £23,000 from general fund reserves to support the Selsey and Midhurst Vision projects and approves the Project Initiation Documents attached to this agenda report. 3. Background 3.1 The Cabinet agreed in January 2018, as part of the revised Corporate Plan for the authority, to approve a number of projects for development. Two of these projects were the Midhurst and Selsey Visions. 3.2 Initial Project Proposal Documents for both Visions were considered at the Cabinet meeting in January. Since this time further work has been undertaken to progress the visions, including the production of the Project Initiation Document (PID) (see Appendices 1 and 2) for each of the Visions. The PIDs set out in more detail how the anticipated budget of £10,500 and £12,500 for Selsey and Midhurst respectively will be allocated. 3.3 In order to authorise the budgets for these projects and to ensure that works can progress over the summer months for both Visions, it is requested that the Council approves the funds of £10,500 for Selsey and £12,500 for Midhurst. Ordinarily PIDs and funding of up to £100,000 would be approved by Cabinet. However, as the Cabinet does not meet again until September, the Council is asked to approve these PIDs and the necessary funding under the urgency provision in the constitution, so as to enable work to progress over the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Shopper Bus SAINSBURY's CHICHESTER
    Shopper Bus SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER C1 - Mondays only C2 - Wednesdays only Petworth Hampers Green 0940 Old Bosham Bosham Walk 1005 Petworth Square 0945 Bosham White Swan 1013 Duncton Cricketers 0955 Arundel Park Windsor Road 1019 Upwaltham Letterbox 1002 St James Road 1021 Halnaker Crossroads 1010 SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER arr 1026 SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER arr 1020 SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER dep 1205 SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER dep 1150 (return journey) (return journey) C4 - Tuesdays, Thursdays & Fridays C3 - Mondays only Tu/Th Fri Midhurst Bus Stand 1100 Bognor Regis High Street 0915 1015 Holmbush Way 1105 Bognor Regis Victoria Drive 0918 1018 Cocking Post Office 1111 Aldwick Road Post Office 0922 1022 Singleton Grooms Yard 1116 West Meads Oxford Drive 0927 1027 West Dean Selsey Arms 1120 Rose Green St Anthonys Church 0932 1032 Lavant Yarbrook Cottages 1126 Willowhale Elbridge Crescent 0936 1036 Summersdale The Avenue 1131 Pagham Shopping Centre 0944 1044 SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER arr 1140 Nyetimber Bear Inn 0948 1048 SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER dep 1300 North Mundham School 0954 1054 (return journey) SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER arr 1006 1106 C5 - Tuesdays & Thursdays SAINSBURY’S CHICHESTER dep 1140 1240 (return journey) Yapton North End 1032 Yapton Sparks Corner 1034 C6 - Wednesdays & Fridays Elmer Templesheen Road 1041 Selsey Seal Road 0855 Middleton Sea Lane 1044 Selsey East Beach Car Park 0904 Flansham Park Alfriston Close 1046 Selsey Church 0908 Felpham The Southdowns 1048 Sidlesham Manhood Lane 0915 Felpham Post Office 1052 Hunston Spotted Cow 0923 Bognor
    [Show full text]