Starlet Sea Anemone (Nematostella Vectensis)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Reproduction in Plants Which But, She Has Never Seen the Seeds We Shall Learn in This Chapter
Reproduction in 12 Plants o produce its kind is a reproduction, new plants are obtained characteristic of all living from seeds. Torganisms. You have already learnt this in Class VI. The production of new individuals from their parents is known as reproduction. But, how do Paheli thought that new plants reproduce? There are different plants always grow from seeds. modes of reproduction in plants which But, she has never seen the seeds we shall learn in this chapter. of sugarcane, potato and rose. She wants to know how these plants 12.1 MODES OF REPRODUCTION reproduce. In Class VI you learnt about different parts of a flowering plant. Try to list the various parts of a plant and write the Asexual reproduction functions of each. Most plants have In asexual reproduction new plants are roots, stems and leaves. These are called obtained without production of seeds. the vegetative parts of a plant. After a certain period of growth, most plants Vegetative propagation bear flowers. You may have seen the It is a type of asexual reproduction in mango trees flowering in spring. It is which new plants are produced from these flowers that give rise to juicy roots, stems, leaves and buds. Since mango fruit we enjoy in summer. We eat reproduction is through the vegetative the fruits and usually discard the seeds. parts of the plant, it is known as Seeds germinate and form new plants. vegetative propagation. So, what is the function of flowers in plants? Flowers perform the function of Activity 12.1 reproduction in plants. Flowers are the Cut a branch of rose or champa with a reproductive parts. -
Feeding-Dependent Tentacle Development in the Sea Anemone Nematostella Vectensis
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.12.985168; this version posted March 12, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Feeding-dependent tentacle development in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis Aissam Ikmi1,2*, Petrus J. Steenbergen1, Marie Anzo1, Mason R. McMullen2,3, Anniek Stokkermans1, Lacey R. Ellington2, and Matthew C. Gibson2,4 Affiliations: 1Developmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany. 2Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA. 3Department of Pharmacy, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA. 4Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA. *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.12.985168; this version posted March 12, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Summary In cnidarians, axial patterning is not restricted to embryonic development but continues throughout a prolonged life history filled with unpredictable environmental changes. How this developmental capacity copes with fluctuations of food availability and whether it recapitulates embryonic mechanisms remain poorly understood. To address these questions, we utilize the tentacles of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis as a novel paradigm for developmental patterning across distinct life history stages. -
An Adaptable Chromosome Preparation Methodology for Use In
Guo et al. BMC Biology (2018) 16:25 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0497-4 METHODOLOGY ARTICLE Open Access An adaptable chromosome preparation methodology for use in invertebrate research organisms Longhua Guo1†, Alice Accorsi2,3†, Shuonan He2, Carlos Guerrero-Hernández2, Shamilene Sivagnanam4, Sean McKinney2, Matthew Gibson2 and Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado2,3* Abstract Background: The ability to efficiently visualize and manipulate chromosomes is fundamental to understanding the genome architecture of organisms. Conventional chromosome preparation protocols developed for mammalian cells and those relying on species-specific conditions are not suitable for many invertebrates. Hence, a simple and inexpensive chromosome preparation protocol, adaptable to multiple invertebrate species, is needed. Results: We optimized a chromosome preparation protocol and applied it to several planarian species (phylum Platyhelminthes), the freshwater apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (phylum Mollusca), and the starlet sea anemone Nematostella vectensis (phylum Cnidaria). We demonstrated that both mitotically active adult tissues and embryos can be used as sources of metaphase chromosomes, expanding the potential use of this technique to invertebrates lacking cell lines and/or with limited access to the complete life cycle. Simple hypotonic treatment with deionized water was sufficient for karyotyping; growing cells in culture was not necessary. The obtained karyotypes allowed the identification of differences in ploidy and chromosome architecture among -
Toxin-Like Neuropeptides in the Sea Anemone Nematostella Unravel Recruitment from the Nervous System to Venom
Toxin-like neuropeptides in the sea anemone Nematostella unravel recruitment from the nervous system to venom Maria Y. Sachkovaa,b,1, Morani Landaua,2, Joachim M. Surma,2, Jason Macranderc,d, Shir A. Singera, Adam M. Reitzelc, and Yehu Morana,1 aDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel; bSars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway; cDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223; and dBiology Department, Florida Southern College, Lakeland, FL 33801 Edited by Baldomero M. Olivera, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, and approved September 14, 2020 (received for review May 31, 2020) The sea anemone Nematostella vectensis (Anthozoa, Cnidaria) is a to a target receptor in the nervous system of the prey or predator powerful model for characterizing the evolution of genes func- interfering with transmission of electric impulses. For example, tioning in venom and nervous systems. Although venom has Nv1 toxin from Nematostella inhibits inactivation of arthropod evolved independently numerous times in animals, the evolution- sodium channels (12), while ShK toxin from Stichodactyla heli- ary origin of many toxins remains unknown. In this work, we pin- anthus is a potassium channel blocker (13). Nematostella’snem- point an ancestral gene giving rise to a new toxin and functionally atocytes produce multiple toxins with a 6-cysteine pattern of the characterize both genes in the same species. Thus, we report a ShK toxin (7, 9). The ShKT superfamily is ubiquitous across sea case of protein recruitment from the cnidarian nervous to venom anemones (14); however, its evolutionary origin remains unknown. -
Dynamics of Venom Composition Across a Complex Life Cycle Yaara Y
bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jul. 5, 2017; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/159889. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Dynamics of venom composition across a complex life cycle Yaara Y. Columbus-Shenkar#, Maria Y. Sachkova#, Arie Fridrich, Vengamanaidu Modepalli, Kartik Sunagar, Yehu Moran* Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel #These authors contributed equally to this work *Corresponding author: [email protected] Keywords: venom evolution; Cnidaria; life cycle bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jul. 5, 2017; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/159889. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Little is known about venom in young developmental stages of animals. The appearance of stinging cells in very early life stages of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis suggests that toxins and venom are synthesized already in eggs, embryos and larvae of this species. Here we harness transcriptomic and biochemical tools as well as transgenesis to study venom production dynamics in Nematostella. We find that the venom composition and arsenal of toxin-producing cells change dramatically between developmental stages of this species. These findings might be explained by the vastly different ecology of the larva and adult polyp as sea anemones develop from a miniature non-feeding mobile planula to a much larger sessile polyp that predates on other animals. -
Feeding-Dependent Tentacle Development in the Sea Anemone Nematostella Vectensis ✉ Aissam Ikmi 1,2 , Petrus J
ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18133-0 OPEN Feeding-dependent tentacle development in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis ✉ Aissam Ikmi 1,2 , Petrus J. Steenbergen1, Marie Anzo 1, Mason R. McMullen2,3, Anniek Stokkermans1, Lacey R. Ellington2 & Matthew C. Gibson2,4 In cnidarians, axial patterning is not restricted to embryogenesis but continues throughout a prolonged life history filled with unpredictable environmental changes. How this develop- 1234567890():,; mental capacity copes with fluctuations of food availability and whether it recapitulates embryonic mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here we utilize the tentacles of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis as an experimental paradigm for developmental patterning across distinct life history stages. By analyzing over 1000 growing polyps, we find that tentacle progression is stereotyped and occurs in a feeding-dependent manner. Using a combination of genetic, cellular and molecular approaches, we demonstrate that the crosstalk between Target of Rapamycin (TOR) and Fibroblast growth factor receptor b (Fgfrb) signaling in ring muscles defines tentacle primordia in fed polyps. Interestingly, Fgfrb-dependent polarized growth is observed in polyp but not embryonic tentacle primordia. These findings show an unexpected plasticity of tentacle development, and link post-embryonic body patterning with food availability. 1 Developmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany. 2 Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, -
A Sea Anemone, <I>Edwardsia Meridionalls</I> Sp. Nov., From
AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Williams, R. B., 1981. A sea anemone, Edwardsia meridionalis sp. Nov., from Antarctica and a preliminary revision of the genus Edwardsia de Quatrefages, 1841 (Coelenterata: Actiniaria). Records of the Australian Museum 33(6): 325–360. [28 February 1981]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.33.1981.271 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia A SEA ANEMONE, EDWARDSIA MERIDIONALlS SP. NOV., FROM ANTARCTICA AND A PRELIMINARY REVISION OF THE GENUS EDWARDSIA DE QUATREFAGES, 1841 (COELENTERATA: ACTINIARIA). R. B. WllLIAMS 2 Carrington Place, Tring, Herts., HP23 SLA, England SUMMARY A newly recognized sea anemone, Edwardsia meridionalis sp. nov., from McMurdo Sound, Antarctica is described and compared with other Edwardsia species. Its habitat and geographical distribution are described. The generic name Edwardsia de Quatrefages, 1841 and the familial name Edwardsiidae Andres, 1881 are invalid. A summary of a proposal made to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature to conserve these names is given. The genus Edwardsia is defined and its known synonyms are given. A review of the published descriptions found of nominal Edwardsia species revealed many nomina nuda, nomina dubia, synonyms and homonyms. The remaining nomina clara comprize forty currently accepted nominal species, which are listed with their known synonyms and geographical distributions. The following nomenclatural changes are instituted: E. carlgreni nom. novo is proposed as a replacement name for E. -
THE Fungus FILES 31 REPRODUCTION & DEVELOPMENT
Reproduction and Development SPORES AND SO MUCH MORE! At any given time, the air we breathe is filled with the spores of many different types of fungi. They form a large proportion of the “flecks” that are seen when direct sunlight shines into a room. They are also remarkably small; 1800 spores could fit lined up on a piece of thread 1 cm long. Fungi typically release extremely high numbers of spores at a time as most of them will not germinate due to landing on unfavourable habitats, being eaten by invertebrates, or simply crowded out by intense competition. A mid-sized gilled mushroom will release up to 20 billion spores over 4-6 days at a rate of 100 million spores per hour. One specimen of the common bracket fungus (Ganoderma applanatum) can produce 350 000 spores per second which means 30 billion spores a day and 4500 billion in one season. Giant puffballs can release a number of spores that number into the trillions. Spores are dispersed via wind, rain, water currents, insects, birds and animals and by people on clothing. Spores contain little or no food so it is essential they land on a viable food source. They can also remain dormant for up to 20 years waiting for an opportune moment to germinate. WHAT ABOUT LIGHT? Though fungi do not need light for food production, fruiting bodies generally grow toward a source of light. Light levels can affect the release of spores; some fungi release spores in the absence of light whereas others (such as the spore throwing Pilobolus) release during the presence of light. -
Marine Biologist Magazine, in Which We Implementation
Issue 14 April 2020 ISSN 2052-5273 Special edition: The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration The Marine The magazine of the Biologistmarine biological community Coral restoration in a warming world Mangroves: the roots of the sea A sea turtle haven in central Oceania | Climate emergency: are we heading for a disastrous future? Tropical laboratories in the Atlantic Ocean | Environmental change and evolution of organisms Editorial Welcome to the latest edition of The mechanisms must be put in place for Marine Biologist magazine, in which we implementation. As the decade celebrate the UN Decade on Ecosys- unfolds, we will bring you updates on tem Restoration (2021–2030). This ecosystem restoration efforts. year promises much for nature as the The vision for the UN Decade on UN's Gabriel Grimsditch explains in Ecosystem Restoration includes the The Marine Biological Association The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, his introduction to this special edition phrase: ‘the relationship between Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK on page 15. The first set of targets humans and nature is restored’. Here, I Editor Guy Baker under Sustainable Development Goal think our own imagination has a major [email protected] 14 (the ocean SDG) will be due, and role. We imagine our world into reality, +44 (0)1752 426239 2020 also marks the announcement of but, as Rob Hopkins argues in his book Executive Editor Matt Frost the UN Decade on Ocean Science for From What Is to What If, many aspects [email protected] Sustainable Development. of our developed, industrialized society +44 (0)1752 426343 Marine ecosystems are by their actively erode our imagination, leaving Editorial Board Guy Baker, Gerald Boalch, Kelvin Boot, Matt Frost, Paul Rose. -
Mathematical Models of Budding Yeast Colony Formation and Damage Segregation in Stem Cells
Mathematical models of budding yeast colony formation and damage segregation in stem cells Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Yanli Wang, B.S., M.S. Graduate Program in Mathematics The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Ching-Shan Chou, Advisor Dr. Janet Best Dr. Ghaith Hiary Dr. Wing-Cheong Lo c Copyright by Yanli Wang 2017 Abstract This dissertation consists of two chapters. In Chapter 1, we present a individual-based model to study budding yeast colony development. Budding yeast, which undergoes polarized growth during budding and mating, has been a useful model system to study cell polarization. Bud sites are select- ed differently in haploid and diploid yeast cells: haploid cells bud in an axial manner, while diploid cells bud in a bipolar manner. While previous studies have been focused on the molecular details of the bud site selection and polarity establishment, not much is known about how different budding patterns give rise to different functions at the population level. In this chapter, we developed a two-dimensional agent-based model to study budding yeast colonies with cell-type specific biological processes, such as budding, mating, mating type switch, consumption of nutrients, and cell death. The model demonstrates that the axial budding pattern enhances mating probability at the early stage and the bipolar budding pattern improves colony development under nutrient limitation. Our results suggest that the frequency of mating type switch might control the trade-off between diploidization and inbreeding. -
Common Standards Monitoring Guidance for Lagoons Contents
Common Standards Monitoring Guidance for Lagoons Version August 2004 Updated from (February 2004) ISSN 1743-8160 (online) UK guidance for Lagoons Issue date: August 2004 Common Standards Monitoring guidance for Lagoons Contents 1 Definition of Lagoons ...................................................................................................................... 2 2 Background, targets and monitoring techniques for individual attributes ....................................... 3 2.1 Extent........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Isolating barrier – presence, nature and integrity..................................................................... 6 2.3 Salinity regime.......................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Biotope composition............................................................................................................... 10 2.5 Extent of sub-feature or representative/notable biotopes........................................................ 12 2.6 Extent of water........................................................................................................................ 13 2.7 Distribution of biotopes .......................................................................................................... 15 2.8 Species composition of representative or notable biotopes ................................................... -
The Starlet Sea Anemone
The Starlet Sea Anemone I. The starlet sea anemone (Nematostella vectensis)—an “emerging model system” A. The growing literature on Nematostella. A query of the Scientific Citation Index (conducted 06/26/07) identified 74 articles and reviews that contain “nematostella” in the title, keywords, or abstract. The number of such publications is increasing dramatically (Fig. 1a), as are the citations of these papers (Fig. 1b). Much of the Nematostella literature is not yet indexed; we identified another 66 published books, reviews, or articles published prior to the 1990’s that mention Nematostella. An annotated list is housed at http://nematostella.org/Resources_References. A B Figure 1. Nematostella publications (A) and citations (B) by year. B. Nematostella’s Merits as a Model System Nematostella is an estuarine sea anemone that is native to the Atlantic coast of North America. In the early 1990’s, its potential value as a model system for developmental biology was first explicitly recognized by Hand and Uhlinger [1]. Over the last 10 years, its utility has extended far beyond developmental biology due to its informative phylogenetic position, and its amenability to field studies, organismal studies, developmental studies, cellular studies, molecular and biochemical studies, genetic studies, and genomic studies [2]. 1. Phylogenetic relationships. Nematostella is a member of the Cnidaria, one of the oldest metazoan phyla. The Cnidaria is a closely related outgroup to the Bilateria, the evolutionary lineage that comprises >99% of all extant animals (Fig. 3). Comparisons between Nematostella and bilaterians have provided insights into the evolution of key animal innovations, including germ cell specification, bilateral symmetry, mesoderm, and the nervous system [3-7].