Other I&AP's Kwa-Zulu Natal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Kwazulu-Natal Province Facility, Sub-District and District
KWAZULU-NATAL PROVINCE FACILITY, SUB-DISTRICT AND DISTRICT Facility Posts Period Field of Study Province District Sub-District Facility 2017 Audiologist kz KwaZulu-Natal Province kz Amajuba District Municipality kz Dannhauser Local Municipality kz Dannhauser CHC 1 kz Dannhauser Local Municipality Total 1 kz Newcastle Local Municipality kz Madadeni Hospital 1 kz Newcastle Local Municipality Total 1 kz Amajuba District Municipality Total 2 kz eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality kz eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality Sub kz Hlengisizwe CHC 1 kz Tongaat CHC 1 kz eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality Sub Total 2 kz eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality Total 2 kz Harry Gwala District Municipality kz Greater Kokstad Local Municipality kz East Griqualand and Usher Memorial Hospital 1 kz Greater Kokstad Local Municipality Total 1 kz Ubuhlebezwe Local Municipality kz Christ the King Hospital 1 kz Ubuhlebezwe Local Municipality Total 1 kz Umzimkhulu Local Municipality kz Rietvlei Hospital 1 kz St Margaret's TB MDR Hospital 1 kz Umzimkhulu Local Municipality Total 2 kz Harry Gwala District Municipality Total 4 kz iLembe District Municipality kz Mandeni Local Municipality kz Sundumbili CHC 1 kz Mandeni Local Municipality Total 1 kz Ndwedwe Local Municipality kz Montebello Hospital 1 kz Ndwedwe Local Municipality Total 1 kz iLembe District Municipality Total 2 kz Ugu District Municipality kz Hibiscus Coast Local Municipality kz Gamalakhe CHC 1 kz Hibiscus Coast Local Municipality Total 1 kz Ugu District Municipality Total 1 kz uMgungundlovu District Municipality -
South Africa
Safrica Page 1 of 42 Recent Reports Support HRW About HRW Site Map May 1995 Vol. 7, No.3 SOUTH AFRICA THREATS TO A NEW DEMOCRACY Continuing Violence in KwaZulu-Natal INTRODUCTION For the last decade South Africa's KwaZulu-Natal region has been troubled by political violence. This conflict escalated during the four years of negotiations for a transition to democratic rule, and reached the status of a virtual civil war in the last months before the national elections of April 1994, significantly disrupting the election process. Although the first year of democratic government in South Africa has led to a decrease in the monthly death toll, the figures remain high enough to threaten the process of national reconstruction. In particular, violence may prevent the establishment of democratic local government structures in KwaZulu-Natal following further elections scheduled to be held on November 1, 1995. The basis of this violence remains the conflict between the African National Congress (ANC), now the leading party in the Government of National Unity, and the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), the majority party within the new region of KwaZulu-Natal that replaced the former white province of Natal and the black homeland of KwaZulu. Although the IFP abandoned a boycott of the negotiations process and election campaign in order to participate in the April 1994 poll, following last minute concessions to its position, neither this decision nor the election itself finally resolved the points at issue. While the ANC has argued during the year since the election that the final constitutional arrangements for South Africa should include a relatively centralized government and the introduction of elected government structures at all levels, the IFP has maintained instead that South Africa's regions should form a federal system, and that the colonial tribal government structures should remain in place in the former homelands. -
Ecological Assessment for the Hlabisa Landfill Site
Ecological Assessment for the Hlabisa landfill site Compiled by: Ina Venter Pr.Sci.Nat Botanical Science (400048/08) M.Sc. Botany trading as Kyllinga Consulting 53 Oakley Street, Rayton, 1001 [email protected] In association with Lukas Niemand Pr.Sci.Nat (400095/06) M.Sc. Restoration Ecology / Zoology Pachnoda Consulting 88 Rubida Street, Murryfield x1, Pretoria [email protected] i Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Uncertainties and limitations .................................................................................................. 1 2. Site .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.1. Location ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2. Site description ....................................................................................................................... 1 3. Background information ................................................................................................................. 4 3.1. Vegetation ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Centres of floristic endemism ................................................................................................ -
Background Information Document: Basic Assessment for the Proposed Pongola Township Development on Portion 419 of the Farm No
ETC-Africa CC Po Box 522 Richards Bay 3900 Richards Bay South Africa Phone: +27 (72) 4760396 [email protected] www.etc-africa.com.za BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT: BASIC ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED PONGOLA TOWNSHIP DEVELOPMENT ON PORTION 419 OF THE FARM NO. 61, PONGOLA, KWAZULU-NATAL WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT? The purpose of this document is to: Inform Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) about the proposed project, and to invite them to participate; Provide a brief background on the proposed project; and Explain the aims and objectives of the Basic Assessment. WHAT IS PROPOSED? An application will been submitted to the KZN Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs on behalf of uPhongolo Local Municipality, Environmental Authorisation for a proposed township development within uPhongolo Local Municipality. The site is 19 hectares in area and is approximately 7 km (by road) from Pongola town. The township development will be comprised of: • High density housing (280 units) • Public open spaces; • A creche; • A place of worship (church); • A business center; • Associated infrastructure (roads, stormwater, sanitation, electricity) In terms of Listing Notice 1 (GNR R983) promulgated in 2014 under The National Environmental Management Act (Act No. 107 of 1998), EIA Regulations 2014, listed activities will be triggered by this development and therefore requires a Basic Assessment report to be submitted to KZN Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs. The listed activities triggered by the proposed development are as follows: Listing Notice 1: Activity 28; Residential, mixed, retail, commercial, industrial or institutional developments where such land was used for agriculture or afforestation on or after 01 April 1998 and where such development: (ii) will occur outside an urban area, where the total land to be developed is bigger than 1 hectare; Listing Notice 1. -
DISTRICT ECONOMIC PROFILES Umkhanyakude District 2021
Office of the Head of Department 270 Jabu Ndlovu Street, Pietermaritzburg, 3201 Tel: +27 (33) 264 2515, Fax: 033 264 2680 Private Bag X 9152 Pietermaritzburg, 3200 www.kznded.gov.za DISTRICT ECONOMIC PROFILES UMkhanyakude District 2021 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION UMkhanyakude DM (DC 27) Population: 686,908 Area Size: 13, 855.3 Km2 Location: Located along the coast in the far north of the KZN Province, it shares its borders with Swaziland and Mozambique, as well as with the districts of Zululand and King Cetshwayo. It consists of the following four local municipalities: uMhlabuyalingana, Jozini, Big 5 Hlabisa and Mtubatuba. The Isimangaliso Wetland Park, is encompassed in the district and it holds a number of biodiversity and conservation areas attracting a number of tourists to the region. DISTRICT SPATIAL FEATURES UMkhanyakude District Municipality is located in the far north eastern corner of the province. The district is bordered by the Indian Ocean to the east and Mozambique and Swaziland to the north, as well as two KZN districts to the south and west. The district shares international borders with two countries: Mozambique in the north and Swaziland along its north-western boundary. The Lubombo SDI corridor (MR439) was upgraded in the late 1990s to a tar road – extending from Hluhluwe through to Mbazwana to join the only other tar road in the region at Pelindaba, before heading north east through KwaNgwanase (Manguzi) to the Mozambique border at Farazel. The dominant land tenure of the district is communal tenure under Ingonyama Trust lands. The only privately owned commercial farms lie in a narrow strip along the N2 from Mtubatuba to Mkuze. -
Zululand District Municipality Integrated
ZULULAND DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 2020/2021 REVIEW Integrated Development Planning is an approach to planning that involves the entire municipality and its citizens in finding the best solutions to achieve good long- term development. OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER [Email address] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Introduction to the Zululand District Municipality ................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Objectives of the ZDM IDP...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Scope of the Zululand District Municipality IDP ..................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Approach ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.6 Public Participation ................................................................................................................................................. 6 2 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT LEGISLATION AND POLICY ......................................................................... -
The Cholera Outbreak
The Cholera Outbreak: A 2000-2002 case study of the source of the outbreak in the Madlebe Tribal Authority areas, uThungulu Region, KwaZulu-Natal rdsn Edward Cottle The Rural Development Services Network (RDSN) Private Bag X67 Braamfontein 2017 Tel: (011) 403 7324 www.rdsn.org.za Hameda Deedat International Labour and Research Information Group (ILRIG) P.O. Box 1213 Woodstock 7915 Tel: (021) 447 6375 www.aidc.org.za/ilrig Edited by Dudley Moloi Sub-edited by Nicolas Dieltiens Funders: Municipal Services Project SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS’ UNION Acknowledgements A special word of thanks to: Fieldworkers Dudu Khumalo and Sikhumbuso Khanyile from SAMWU KZN, for their help with the community interviews. And to our referees: Dr. David Hemson (Human Science Research Council) Dr. David Sanders (Public Health Programme, University of the Western Cape) Sue Tilley (Social Consultant) Stephen Greenberg (Social Consultant) Contents Executive summary 1 Section 1: Introduction 7 1.1 Objectives of the study 9 Section 2: Methodology 10 2.1 Research methods 10 2.1.1 Transepts 10 2.1.2 In-depth Interviews 11 2.1.3 Interviews in Ngwelezane 11 2.1.4 Interviews in the rural areas 12 2.1.5 Interviews with municipal officials 12 2.2 Limitations of the research 13 Section 3: The Policy Context 14 Section 4: The Geographic Context 16 4.1 A description of the area under Investigation 16 4.1.1 Introduction 16 4.1.2 Brief History 16 4.1.3 Demographic information 17 4.1.4 Economic Expansion 18 4.1.5 Climate & Disease 20 4.1.6 Water & Sanitation 20 4.2 Post-apartheid -
Challenges and Developments Facing SA Coal Logistics”
“Challenges and developments facing SA Coal Logistics” IHS Energy SA Coal Conference 1 February 2019 Mandisa Mondi, General Manager: Coal BU - Transnet Freight Rail Transnet Freight Rail is a division of Transnet SOC Ltd Reg no.: 1990/000900/30 An Authorised Financial 1 Service Provider – FSP 18828 Overview SA Competitiveness The Transnet Business and Mandate The Coal Line: Profile Export Coal Philosophy Challenges and Opportunities New Developments Conclusions Transnet Freight Rail is a division of Transnet SOC Ltd Reg no.: 1990/000900/30 2 SA Competitiveness: Global Reserves Global Reserves (bt) Global Production (mt) Despite large reserves of coal that remain across the world, electricity generation alternatives are USA 1 237.29 2 906 emerging and slowing down dependence on coal. Russia 2 157.01 6 357 European countries have diversified their 3 114.5 1 3,87 China energy mix reducing reliance on coal Australia 4 76.46 3 644 significantly. India 5 60.6 4 537 However, Asia and Africa are still at a level where countries are facilitating access to Germany 6 40.7 8 185 basic electricity and advancing their Ukraine 7 33.8 10 60 industrial sectors, and are likely to strongly Kazakhstan 8 33.6 9 108 rely on coal for power generation. South Africa 9 30.1 7 269 South Africa remains in the top 10 producing Indonesia 10 28 5 458 countries putting it in a fairly competitive level with the rest of global producers. Source: World Energy Council 2016 SA Competitiveness : Coal Quality Country Exports Grade Heating value Ash Sulphur (2018) USA 52mt B 5,850 – 6,000 14% 1.0% Indonesia 344mt C 5,500 13.99% Australia 208mt B 5,850 – 6,000 15% 0.75% Russia 149.3mt B 5,850 – 6,000 15% 0.75% Colombia 84mt B 5,850 – 6,000 11% 0.85% S Africa 78mt B 5,500 - 6,000 17% 1.0% South Africa’s coal quality is graded B , the second best coal quality in the world and Grade Calorific Value Range (in kCal/kg) compares well with major coal exporting countries globally. -
Umlalazi Strategic Planning Session
UMLALAZI STRATEGIC PLANNING SESSION INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Lizette Dirker IDP Coordination Business Unit INFORMANTS OF THE IDP SOUTH AFRICAN PLANNING SYSTEMS National Provincial Local District wide PGDS Vision 2030 DGDP (Vision 2035) (Vision 2035) National IDP PGDP Development 5 years Plan National Provincial Municipal Planning Planning Council Commission Commission WARD BASED SDGs SDGs PLANS “KZN as a prosperous Province with healthy, secure and skilled population, living in dignity and harmony, acting as a gateway to Africa and the World” Sustainable Development Goals AGENDA 2063 50 Year Vision • Agenda 2063 is a strategic framework for the socio-economic transformation of the continent over the next 50 years. It builds on, and seeks to accelerate the implementation of past and existing continental initiatives for growth and sustainable development Adopted in January 2015 • Adopted in January 2015, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia by the 24th African Union (AU) Assembly of Heads of State and Government 10 Year implementation cycle • Five ten year implementation plan – the first plan 2014-2023 1. A prosperous Africa based on inclusive growth and sustainable 5. An Africa with a strong cultural development identity, common heritage, shared values and ethics 2. An integrated continent, politically united and based on the ideals of Pan-Africanism and the 6. An Africa whose development vision of Africa’s Renaissance is people-driven, relying on the potential of African people, especially its women and youth, and caring for children 3. An Africa of good governance, democracy, respect for human rights, justice and the rule of law 7. Africa as a strong, united and influential global player and partner 4. -
Umkhanyakude Development Agency Strategic Plan 2019-2024
UMKHANYAKUDE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY STRATEGIC PLAN 2019-2024 UMDA STRATEGIC PLAN 2019-2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.1. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2. THE MANDATE OF UMHLOSINGA DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ..................................................................... 3 2. THE STRATEGIC PLAN 2019-2024 ..................................................................................................... 4 2.1. CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE NEXT 5 YEARS .................................................................... 5 2.2. VISION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................. 9 2.3. GUIDING PRINCIPLE ................................................................................................................................ 10 2.4. CATALYTIC PROJECTS AND ACTIONS ....................................................................................................... 11 3. IMPLEMENTATION STRUCTURES ........................................................................................... 20 3.1. ORGANISING FOR IMPLEMENTATION ..................................................................................................... 20 3.2. FUNDING MODEL ................................................................................................................................... -
Local Economic Development Strategy for Jozini Municipality
JOZINI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY (KZ272) INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (IDP) 2019/20 REVIEW ANNEXURE D: ADOPTED LED STRATEGY ADOPTED: 29TH MAY 2019 Prepared by Jozini Local Municipality Circle Street, Bottom Town, Jozini 3969 Tel: 035 572 1292 Fax: 035 572 1266 Website: www.jozini.gov.za TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................6 LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. 9 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................10 1.1 BACKGROUND TO PROJECT ..................................................................................................10 1.2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................10 1.3 UNDERSTANDING LED ............................................................................................................11 1.4 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................12 1.5 LOCATION MAP.........................................................................................................................14 1.6 STRUCTURE -
Appendix E. Public Participation Process.Pdf
Appendix E. Public Participation Public Participation Process for the Proposed Township Development on Portion 419 of Farm No. 61, Pongola, Kwazulu -Natal A Report for the BA Process March 2017 Contents 1. Circulating reports for public comment ......................................................... 3 1.1. Circulating reports to Commenting Authorities ...................................................................... 3 1.2. Issues Trail ....................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Comments and Responses to stakeholder .................................................... 3 1.4. Email correspondence with government offices ........................................... 3 2. Proof of public participation requirements .................................................... 3 2.1. Background information document: ....................................................................................... 3 2.2. Interested and Affected Party (I&AP) register ....................................................................... 6 2.3. Newspaper Advertisement: ................................................................................................... 7 2.4. Signs (notice boards) ............................................................................................................. 8 2.5. Notification of neighbours .................................................................................................... 12 2.6. Proof that Draft BAR was sent to stakeholders ..................................................................