Dendrochronological Analysis of Three Seneca Iroquois Log Structures at Letchworth State Park, New York
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Outline of United States Federal Indian Law and Policy
Outline of United States federal Indian law and policy The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to United States federal Indian law and policy: Federal Indian policy – establishes the relationship between the United States Government and the Indian Tribes within its borders. The Constitution gives the federal government primary responsibility for dealing with tribes. Law and U.S. public policy related to Native Americans have evolved continuously since the founding of the United States. David R. Wrone argues that the failure of the treaty system was because of the inability of an individualistic, democratic society to recognize group rights or the value of an organic, corporatist culture represented by the tribes.[1] U.S. Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases involving Indian tribes Citizenship Adoption Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 530 U.S. _ (2013) Tribal Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) Civil rights Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978) United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313 (1978) Congressional authority Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980) California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) United States v. -
Upper Canada, New York, and the Iroquois Six Nations, 1783-1815 Author(S): Alan Taylor Reviewed Work(S): Source: Journal of the Early Republic, Vol
Society for Historians of the Early American Republic The Divided Ground: Upper Canada, New York, and the Iroquois Six Nations, 1783-1815 Author(s): Alan Taylor Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of the Early Republic, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Spring, 2002), pp. 55-75 Published by: University of Pennsylvania Press on behalf of the Society for Historians of the Early American Republic Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3124858 . Accessed: 02/11/2011 18:25 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of Pennsylvania Press and Society for Historians of the Early American Republic are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Early Republic. http://www.jstor.org THE DIVIDED GROUND: UPPER CANADA, NEW YORK, AND THE IROQUOIS SIX NATIONS, 1783-1815 AlanTaylor In recentyears, historians have paid increasing attention to bordersand borderlandsas fluidsites of bothnational formation and local contestation. At theirperipheries, nations and empires assert their power and define their identitywith no certainty of success.Nation-making and border-making are inseparablyintertwined. Nations and empires, however, often reap defiance frompeoples uneasily bisected by theimposed boundaries. This process of border-making(and border-defiance)has been especiallytangled in the Americaswhere empires and republicsprojected their ambitions onto a geographyoccupied and defined by Indians.Imperial or nationalvisions ran up against the tangled complexities of interdependentpeoples, both native and invader. -
The Protocols of Indian Treaties As Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (Religious Studies) Department of Religious Studies 9-2015 How to Buy a Continent: The Protocols of Indian Treaties as Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society Anthony F C Wallace University of Pennsylvania Timothy B. Powell University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/rs_papers Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, Religion Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Wallace, Anthony F C and Powell, Timothy B., "How to Buy a Continent: The Protocols of Indian Treaties as Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society" (2015). Departmental Papers (Religious Studies). 15. https://repository.upenn.edu/rs_papers/15 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/rs_papers/15 For more information, please contact [email protected]. How to Buy a Continent: The Protocols of Indian Treaties as Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society Abstract In 1743, when Benjamin Franklin announced the formation of an American Philosophical Society for the Promotion of Useful Knowledge, it was important for the citizens of Pennsylvania to know more about their American Indian neighbors. Beyond a slice of land around Philadelphia, three quarters of the province were still occupied by the Delaware and several other Indian tribes, loosely gathered under the wing of an Indian confederacy known as the Six Nations. Relations with the Six Nations and their allies were being peacefully conducted in a series of so-called “Indian Treaties” that dealt with the fur trade, threats of war with France, settlement of grievances, and the purchase of land. -
A Narrative of the Life of Mrs Mary Jemison: Rhetorical Drag and the Defiance of Hegemonic Cultural Models
ATLANTIS. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies. 32.1 (June 2010): 73–86 ISSN 0210-6124 A Narrative of the Life of Mrs Mary Jemison: Rhetorical Drag and the Defiance of Hegemonic Cultural Models Elena Ortells Montón Universitat Jaume I de Castelló [email protected] In 1758, Mary Jemison was captured by a party of Indians and adopted by two Seneca sisters. She progressively accommodated herself to Indian life, married two Indian warriors and bore them several children. Sixty-five years after her abduction, the woman agreed to tell James E. Seaver the story of her life. My goal is to use Lorrayne Carroll’s rhetorical drag as a hermeneutic to analyze authorial impersonation in A Narrative of the Life of Mrs Mary Jemison, to underline the failure of the white male impersonator to marginalize the speaking voice of the narrative and to highlight the capacity of the I object/subject to destabilize canonical readings of the text and to offer a revisionist history of cross-cultural encounters. Thus, it is my intention to present this account as an instrument of defiance of hegemonic cultural models and as an example of how intercultural manifestations negotiate and hybridise fixed paradigms. Keywords: Mary Jemison/Dehgewanus; rhetorical drag; captivity narratives; Indian autobiographies Relato de la Vida de Mary Jemison: La Máscara Retórica y el Desafío de los Modelos Culturales Hegemónicos En 1758, Mary Jemison fue capturada por un grupo de indios y adoptada por dos hermanas Seneca. Poco a poco, Mary se fue adaptando a la vida india y acabó casándose con dos guerreros indios con los que tuvo varios hijos. -
Captivating Emotions: Sentiment and the Work of Rhetorical Drag in Colonial and Early National Captivity Narrative
University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Dissertations and Theses @ UNI Student Work 2009 Captivating emotions: Sentiment and the work of rhetorical drag in colonial and early national captivity narrative Gleidson Gouveia University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2009 Glenidson Gouveia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd Recommended Citation Gouveia, Gleidson, "Captivating emotions: Sentiment and the work of rhetorical drag in colonial and early national captivity narrative" (2009). Dissertations and Theses @ UNI. 556. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/556 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses @ UNI by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CAPTIVATING EMOTIONS: SENTIMENT AND THE WORK OF RHETORICAL DRAG IN COLONIAL AND EARLY NATIONAL CAPTIVITY NARRATIVE An Abstract of a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Gleidson Gouveia University of Northern Iowa July 2009 ABSTRACT Captivity narrative, the American genre initiated early in the seventeenth century, tells the story of Europeans abducted by Native Americans in the New England frontier. These texts, however, do not simply tell the subjects' experiences of confinement among the Indians but reveal important relations of power, religion, and politics that took place in Early America. This work analyzes the captivity narratives of Mary Rowlandson, Mary Swarton, John Williams, Mary Jemison, and John Tanner to understand how their experiences were appropriated by third parties in order to meet religious and political ends of their respective times. -
Journal of William Colbert for the Northumberland, Wyoming And
Introduction 3 Introduction: The Man and His Journal Early Methodist Episcopal circuit rider William Colbert (1764-1833) served circuits in Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware, and Virginia. He was admitted on trial in 1790 1 and into full connection in 1792, at which time he was also ordained a deacon. Colbert was ordained an elder in 1795. He served most of his time as a traveling minister and retired from the itinerancy in 1811. William Colbert was born near Baltimore in Poolesville MD on April 20, 1764. Historian George Peck wrote in 1860 2 that Colbert was remembered by those who heard him preach for his intolerance of noisy children, crowded barns and other unfavorable meeting conditions. He was, however, a dedicated man of God and served with distinction as a circuit rider and district superintendent (or, as it was then called, presiding elder). In November 1804 William Colbert married Elizabeth Stroud (1784- 1849), whose parents were the original founders of Stroudsburg PA. He died June 16, 1833, in Stroudsburg PA. William Colbert kept a journal of his travels – which ranks with Francis Asbury’s as one of the earliest definitive records of American Methodism and its circuits. While a three-volume edited, indexed and annotated transcription of Asbury’s journal has been published, no one has yet undertaken that task for Colbert’s journal. The original journal and a typewritten transcription are prized possessions within the special collections at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary in Evanston IL. In 1957, the Library of Congress microfilmed the typewritten copy. In 1964 the Central Pennsylvania Conference purchased a microfilm copy of the journal from the LOC. -
A Narrative of the Life of Mrs. Mary Jemison James E. Seaver
A Narrative of the Life of Mrs. Mary Jemison James E. Seaver The Project Gutenberg EBook of A Narrative of the Life of Mrs. Mary Jemison by James E. Seaver Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook. This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project Gutenberg file. Please do not remove it. Do not change or edit the header without written permission. Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is important information about your specific rights and restrictions in how the file may be used. You can also find out about how to make a donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved. **Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts** **eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971** *****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!***** Title: A Narrative of the Life of Mrs. Mary Jemison Author: James E. Seaver Release Date: November, 2004 [EBook #6960] [Yes, we are more than one year ahead of schedule] [This file was first posted on February 19, 2003] Edition: 10 Language: English Character set encoding: ASCII *** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LIFE OF MRS. MARY JEMISON *** This eBook was produced by Robert Connal, David Moynihan, Charles Franks and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team A NARRATIVE OF THE LIFE OF MRS. MARY JEMISON, Who was taken by the Indians, in the year 1755, when only about twelve years of age, and has continued to reside amongst them to the present time. -
G:\OSG\Desktop
No. 05-905 In the Supreme Court of the United States SENECA NATION OF INDIANS AND TONAWANDA BAND OF SENECA INDIANS, PETITIONERS v. STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES IN OPPOSITION PAUL D. CLEMENT Solicitor General Counsel of Record SUE ELLEN WOOLDRIDGE Assistant Attorney General WILLIAM LAZARUS SAMUEL C. ALEXANDER Attorneys Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 (202) 514-2217 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, because the 1794 Treaty of Canandaigua recognized that the historic Seneca Indian Nation owned the Niagara River Islands, the State of New York’s purported purchase of the Niagara Islands in 1815 without ratification by Congress violated the Indian Trade and Intercourse Act, 25 U.S.C. 177. (I) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Opinions below........................................ 1 Jurisdiction........................................... 1 Statement............................................ 2 Argument........................................... 10 Conclusion .......................................... 19 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases: Barney v. Keokuk, 94 U.S. 324 (1876) ................. 12 County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation, 470 U.S. 226 (1985) ....................................... 2 FPC v. Tuscarora Indian Nation, 362 U.S. 99 (1960) . 5, 16 Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe, 521 U.S. 261 (1997) ...... 12 Jones v. Soulard, 65 U.S. (24 How.) 41 (1860) ....... 11, 12 Massachusetts v. New York, 271 U.S. 65 (1926) ........ 13 Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978) ......................................... 13 Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida, 414 U.S. 661 (1974) ....................................... 2 Oneida Indian Nation v. New York, 860 F.2d 1145 (2d Cir. -
"Make Your Minds Perfectly Easy": Sagoyewatha and the Great Law of the Handenosaunee
granville ganter St. JohnsUniversity "MakeYour Minds PerfectlyEasy5 Of all the Native orators of the early nineteenth century, Sago or was one yewatha (pronounced Shay-g?-ye-w?tha Sa-go-ye-wat-ha) of themost famous inAngloamerica. Better known as Red Jacket,for the red as a runner coat given to him by the British for his services message in the on Revolution, Sagoyewathas defiant opposition to missionary presence Seneca reservations and his resistance to land sales earned him the title the "last of the Senecas" in his obituary in theNiles Weekly Register (13 Febru ary 1830: 411). His speeches appeared in broadsides, pamphlets, and even in schoolbooks during the early national period (Densmore 69). Although these records are subject to a variety of editing and transcription problems, a large number were translated by experienced interpreters, and many evoke the figurative language and irony forwhich Sagoyewatha became known (Taylor 23).1And in contrast tomany eighteenth- and nineteenth century publications where Natives took no part in the print circulation of theirwords, toward the end of his career, Sagoyewatha had his speeches as a published in newspapers and handbills part of deliberate publicity to campaign that the Senecas undertook after theWar of 1812 protect their lands. Given that the Senecas often intended to enter the Euroamerican sphere of printed discourse after the Revolution, this essay interprets the archive of Red Jacket speeches (as well as those of a few other politically active an Senecas of the early national period) from Indigenous cultural frame work. It foregrounds Seneca traditions and thoughtways that have received over two only token acknowledgment from literary scholars the past hun dred years, drawing on historical and anthropological work (both Native and non-Native authored) thathas not yetmoved significantly into English literature studies. -
Revisiting Columbia County Forts by Dani Crossley
Revisiting Columbia County Forts By Dani Crossley The Ft. McClure Chapter Daughters of the American Revolution rededicated the Ft. Wheeler monument recently after its relocation to Lightstreet Park. The monument had previously been on private property and difficult to access. It was originally dedicated by the Moses Van Campen DAR chapter in 1915. With the approval of and much assistance from Scott Township, the monument was relocated to Lightstreet Park and rededicated Memorial Day weekend. Many local and DAR dignitaries attended and we are all happy it has found a more permanent and accessible home. There were three such colonial forts in Columbia County in the late 1700s. These forts were basically palisades around a residence for the protection of area settlers against marauding Native Americans. Map showing Revolutionary War era forts in our area Fort Jenkins Ft. Jenkins was built in either the fall of 1777 or spring of 1778 and was only in existence for two years. It was located on the banks of the Susquehanna River (see map, page 1) along what is currently Old Berwick Road in Lime Ridge. The historical marker is on the south side of Old Berwick Road just after the I-80 overpass and before Eshleman’s Nursery. The old canal bed can easily be seen between the site of the fort and the river. There is also a plaque/monument on the north side of Old Berwick Road across from the historical marker. It was dedicated by the Ft. McClure and Moses Van Campen DAR chapters in 1925. We learn about the history of Ft. -
Historic Development
Livingston County Historical Museum Historic Structure Report 30 Center Street, Geneseo, NY SECTION II – HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT Image II -2: Teachers Minnie Toole, Ms.Shepard, and Mis Euchner standing outside of the School (nd). Photo Courtesy of Livingston County Historical Society. Image II - 1: Children playing outside of the schoolhouse (nd). Photo Courtesy of Livingston County Historical Society Copyright 2010 Clinton Brown Company Architecture, pc SECTION II: HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT-1 Livingston County Historical Museum Historic Structure Report 30 Center Street, Geneseo, NY HISTORICAL CONTEXT agricultural industry and came to own a large portion of the area to be incorporated as the Village of Geneseo in 1832. VILLAGE OF GENESEO Their stewardship of much of agricultural Geneseo continued and as community leaders they established many facilities, The Livingston County Historical Society Museum, known including several educational institutions in the Village. formerly as the Cobblestone Schoolhouse, is located in the historic Village of Geneseo, NY about 35 miles to the south of Because of its significance in the development of New York Rochester, NY. Its name is derived from Gen-nis-he-yo, State, in 1977 the Geneseo Main Street area was listed on the Iroquois for “beautiful valley” as it is located with scenic vistas New York State and National Registers of Historic Places, the overlooking the Genesee River Valley. official lists of sites worthy of preservation because of their architectural and cultural significance. The Livingston County Established in the 1790s, the Village of Geneseo was part of Historical Museum at 30 Center Street, in the ca. 1838 the acquisition of Seneca Indian land encompassing Cobblestone Schoolhouse, was deemed a contributing building approximately two-thirds of New York State west of the to the Historic District during the subsequent 1985 boundary Genesee River. -
Notes and Queries. 491
Notes and Queries. 491 NOTES AND QUERIES. Iftotes* LETTER OF WILLIAM COBBETT TO DANIEL CLYMER.—Original in "Clymer Papers/7 LONDON, 15th August, 1800. DEAR SIR, Your letter of the 3rd of June last, was received at New York, some days after I sailed thence. Tt has, through the attention of Mr. Fenno, reached me this day; and, thank God, it finds me well, and all my family well and happy, in Old England, under the protection of the best of Kings, and amidst the most loyal fellow subjects. I thank you for your goodness in forwarding the money from Mr. Jacobs. Please to return him my acknowledgements for it, and for his custom in general. I have not, as yet, started in any publick line of business ; but shall, in a little time. I cannot point out to you precisely what sort of publi- cations I shall issue; but, be assured, sir, that I shall never do, or say, anything that will give you, or any other American, reason to blush for having called me friend. I am not one of those base curs, who grow bold and bark loud, when their enemy is at a distance. The treatment I met with from a people, whom I so sincerely endeavoured to serve, would justify the severest retaliation ; but, I will convince them, that I never feared them, by becoming mild in my sarcasm now I am out of their reach. Nothing, however, but death, shall prevent me from making use of the experience I have gained; I will never traduce America, I will never confound the good with the bad; but I should be wanting to myself, my children, my king and my country, were I not to make the example of America a warning to Britain,—Bush and a few others I must and will gibbet up to everlasting infamy.