Upper Canada, New York, and the Iroquois Six Nations, 1783-1815 Author(S): Alan Taylor Reviewed Work(S): Source: Journal of the Early Republic, Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Upper Canada, New York, and the Iroquois Six Nations, 1783-1815 Author(S): Alan Taylor Reviewed Work(S): Source: Journal of the Early Republic, Vol Society for Historians of the Early American Republic The Divided Ground: Upper Canada, New York, and the Iroquois Six Nations, 1783-1815 Author(s): Alan Taylor Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of the Early Republic, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Spring, 2002), pp. 55-75 Published by: University of Pennsylvania Press on behalf of the Society for Historians of the Early American Republic Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3124858 . Accessed: 02/11/2011 18:25 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of Pennsylvania Press and Society for Historians of the Early American Republic are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Early Republic. http://www.jstor.org THE DIVIDED GROUND: UPPER CANADA, NEW YORK, AND THE IROQUOIS SIX NATIONS, 1783-1815 AlanTaylor In recentyears, historians have paid increasing attention to bordersand borderlandsas fluidsites of bothnational formation and local contestation. At theirperipheries, nations and empires assert their power and define their identitywith no certainty of success.Nation-making and border-making are inseparablyintertwined. Nations and empires, however, often reap defiance frompeoples uneasily bisected by theimposed boundaries. This process of border-making(and border-defiance)has been especiallytangled in the Americaswhere empires and republicsprojected their ambitions onto a geographyoccupied and defined by Indians.Imperial or nationalvisions ran up against the tangled complexities of interdependentpeoples, both native and invader. Indeed, the contest of rival Euro-Americanregimes presented risky opportunitiesfor native peoples to play-off the rivals to preserve native autonomyand enhancetheir circumstances.1 AlanTaylor is professorof historyat theUniversity of Californiaat Davis. He is the authorof LibertyMen and Great Proprietors: The Revolutionary Settlement on theMaine Frontier,1760-1820 (1990); WilliamCooper's Town: Powerand Persuasionon the Frontierof theEarly American Republic (1995); and American Colonies (2001). ! DavidJ. Weber, 'Tuner, the Boltonians, and the Borderlands," American Historical Review,91 (Feb.1986), 66-81; Richard White, The Middle Ground: Indians, Empires, and Republicsin the Great Lakes Region, 1650-1815 (New York, 1991). For a discussionof the relationshipof comnlp-ativeto transnationalhistory, see Ian Tyrell, "American Exceptionalismin an Ageof InternationalHistory," American Historical Review, 96 (Oct. 1991), 1031-55;George M. Frederickson,"From Exceptionalism to Variability:Recent Developmuentsin Cross-National Compaiative History," Journal of AmericanHistory, 82 (Sept. 1995),487-604; and Richard White, 'The Nationalization of Nature,"ibid., 86 (Dec. 1999), 976-86. JOURNAL OF THE EARLY REPUBLIC,22 (Sprin 2002). O 2002 Society for Historiansof the EarlyAmeican Republic. 56 JOURNALOF THE EARLY REPUBLIC Ina recentessay, Jeremy Adelman and Stephen Aron advance a helpful distinctionbetween "borderlands" and "borders." They argue that, in North Americanhistory, native peoples tried to prolong broad and porous "borderlands,"but eventuallybecame confined within the "borders"of consolidatedregimes imposed by invadingEuro-Americans. This paper examines the transitionof one borderland-theland of the Iroquois Indians-into two borderedlands: the Stateof New Yorkin the American republicand the province of UpperCanada in the Britishempire.2 At Parisin 1783,British and American negotiators concluded the War of the AmericanRevolution, recognizing the independenceof the United States while reservingthe Canadianprovinces to the British empire. Americanindependence and Canadian dependence required a newboundary betweenthe youngrepublic and the lingeringempire. The negotiatorsran that boundarythrough the GreatLakes and the riversbetween them, including,most significantly,the thirty-six-mile-longNiagara River that emptiedLake Erie into Lake Ontario. Long a criticaljuncture for overland movementeast-and-west, as well as watertransport north-and-south, the Niagara River assumeda contradictorynew role as an international boundary.A naturalplace of communication,passage, and mixing became redefinedas a place of separationand distinction.Or, so it seemed,on paperto negotiatorsin distantParis and theirsuperiors in Londonand Philadelphia.3 Along the NiagaraRiver, the IroquoisSix Nations clung to their positionas autonomouskeepers of a perpetualand open-ended borderland, a placeof exchangeand interdependence. Recognizing their own weakness in numbersand technology, the nativessought renewed strength in their 2 JeremyAdelman and Stephen Aron, "From Borderlands to Borders:Empires, Nation- States, and the Peoples in Between in North American History," American Historical Review, 104 (June 1999) 814-41. See also Evan Haefeli, "A Note on the Use of North AmericanBorderlands," and John R.Wunder and Pekka Hamalainen, "Of Lethal Places and Lethal Essays,"and the thoughtfulreply by Adelmanand Aron, "Of Lively Exchanges and Larger Perspectives," in ibid. (Oct. 1999), 1222-25, 1229-34, 1235-39. Wunder and Hamalainenfault Adelman and Aron for inadequateattention to the agency of native peoples in borderlandrelationships. The latter accept that point but reiterate the transforming rupture ultimately effected by the United States in confining native peoples within boundaries-a point that Wunderand Hamalainenobscure. 3 For a borderlandsstudy of Canadaand the United States, see Reginald C. Stuart, United States Expansionismand British North America, 1775-1871 (Chapel Hill, 1988). Stuart does not examine the role of Indiansin the constructionof that borderland. A more recent work on a later, more westernportion of the borderdoes illuminatethe pivotal role of native people; see Beth LaDow, TheMedicine Line: Lifeand Death on a NorthAmerican Borderland (New York, 2001). UNDERSTANDINGBOUNDARIES 57 geographicand political position between the Americansand the British. By exploitingthe lingering rivalry between the republic and the empire, the IroquoisSix Nationshoped to remainintermediate and autonomous rather than dividedand absorbed by the rivals. The nativesconceived of their borderlandas porousat bothends to thereception of informationand trade goods andfor the free movement of theirpeople. In 1790the Six Nations spokesmanRed Jacket explained to theAmericans, "that we maypass from one to the otherunmolested ... we wish to be underthe protectionof the thirteenStates as well as of the British."A yearlater, he remindedthe Americans,"[we] do not give ourselvesentirely up to them[the British], nor leanaltogether upon you. Wemean to standupright as we livebetween both." As gatekeepersof a borderland,the Six Nationsenjoyed a leverage thatwould be lost if dividedand confined by an artificialborder defined as a precise geographicline where two Euro-Americanpowers met and assertedcontrol over all inhabitantswithin their respective bounds.4 Beforethe American Revolution, the six Iroquoiannations sustained a loose confederationof villageslocated south of LakeOntario and east of LakeErie, within the territory claimed by thecolony of New York. From east to west,the Six Nationswere the Mohawk (in theMohawk valley), the Oneidaand the Tuscarora(both south of LakeOneida), the Cayugaand Onondaga(in the Finger Lakes region), and the especially numerous Seneca (in the Genesee,Allegheny, and Niagara valleys). Culturallysimilar, they spokekindred languages of theIroquoian family and occupied villages that mixed a few traditionalbark-roofed long-houses with many, compact log cabins. Theirvillages were modest in size-rarely inhabitedby morethan 500 people-and theirpopulation aggregated to about9,000 on the eve of the war. Occupyingand cultivating the most fertile pockets of alluvialsoil, they reservedmost of theirbroad hinterland as a forestfor huntingand gathering.Of course,American settlers coveted that vast hinterland, which theyregarded as wastedupon Indians and properly rededicated to theirown farm-making.5 4 Red Jacket, speech, Nov. 21, 1790, Timothy Pickering Papers (Massachusetts Historical Society, Boston), Red Jacket, speech, July 10, 1791, ibid. See also the Young 21, 1791, AmericanState Indian King's5 speech, May Papers, Affairs, 1: 165. "Reportof GovernorWilliam Tryon on the State of the Province of New York, 1774," in E. B. O'Callaghan,ed., The DocumentaryHistory of the State of New York(4 vols., New York, 1849-51), 1:766; HelenHornbeck Tanner, ed., Atlas ofGreat LakesIndian History (Norman,1987), 74-78; ElisabethTooker, 'The Leagueof the Iroquois:Its History, Politics, and Ritual,"in Bruce G. Trigger, ed., Handbook of North American Indians: Northeast (12 vols. to date;Washington, DC, 1978-2001), 15: 418-41; Dean R. Snow, The Iroquois (Cambridge,MA, 1994), 141-57. 58 JOURNALOF THE EARLY REPUBLIC The Warof the AmericanRevolution proved catastrophic for the Six Nations.Under severe pressure from both sides, the Iroquois divided. Most of the Oneidaand some of theTuscarora assisted the Americanrebels, but the greatmajority of theIroquois allied with the British as theirbest bet for resistingexpansionist settlers.
Recommended publications
  • Greece History
    Greece History Happy Birthday To Monroe County! by Marie Poinan On February 23, 2021, we celebrated the Bicentennial of the founding of Monroe Coun- ty. Named for President James Monroe, the county was carved out of land taken from both Ontario and Genesee Counties; it became a new county on February 23, 1821 by decree of the New York State Legislature. After the Revolutionary War, a treaty of 1783 established the Great Lakes as the north- -exist with the former colonists. Unscrupulous speculators often attempted to swindle the natives by tricking them into surrendering their land, not to mention the fact that George Washington had sent General Sullivan into western New York to forcibly remove the Seneca by burning their crops and destroying their villages. Land speculators Oliver Phelps and Nathaniel Gorham purchased over six million acres in western NY from Massachusetts in 1788. The land extended all the way from Lake Ontario at the north to the Pennsylvania state line on the south. Phelps also negotiated a treaty with the Seneca, Americans to part with an area 12 miles wide by 28 miles long for the construction of a mill on the mill built by When Phelps and Gorham were unable to pay their debts, their unsold lots were sold to Robert Morris of Philadelphia in 1790. Morris was a financier who quickly turned over the sale of a million acres of Genesee land the very next year to Sir William Johnstone Pulteney. Due to a NY State law that said that a foreigner could not pass title to any New York property, Charles Williamson became Bath, Steuben County.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Aspects of the Phelps and Gorham Treaty of July 4-8, 1788
    Edited by DEXTER PERKINS, City Historian and BLAKE MCKELVEY, Assistant City Historian VOL. 1 JANUARY, 1939 No. 1 Historic Aspects of the Phelps and Gorham Treaty of July 4-8, 1788 By BLAKE MCKELVEY The commemoration of the 150th anniversary of the Phelps and Gorham treaty with the Indians presents a challenge to the imagination. The years that have passed since that July council on Buffalo Creek have seen great changes come over this beautiful country. We think first of the marvellous material changes that have taken place, for they are obvious on all sides. We might with much profit consider the institu- tional and cultural developments that make those events of 150 years ago appear like the fanciful episodes of some romantic tale. But it is not the contrast or the changes that we wish to com- memorate. That council on Buffalo Creek was a very real, a very significant occasion. The chain of events of which it was a part, and the setting in which it occurred, were vital aspects of the history of Western New York, and influenced developments throughout the country. Therefore, the recollection of this historic occasion merits our close attention, even though we shall have to turn over many of history’s musty pages in the process. A brief study of the documents is enough to reveal that the men who took part in the treaty at Buffalo Creek, and in the far-flung intrigues that followed it, were sons of Adam as we know them today- some crafty and some straightforward, some simple and some endowed with foresight, some mean and selfish, and some honestly concerned ROCHESTER HISTORY, published quarterly by the Rochester Public Library, dis- tributed free at the Library, by mail 25 cents per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Archaeological Assessment
    MARINE ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT BACKGROUND RESEARCH AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY FOR THE GIBRALTAR POINT EROSION CONTROL PROJECT LAKE ONTARIO SHORELINE ON THE LAKEWARD SIDE OF THE TORONTO ISLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF TORONTO Prepared for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive North York, Ontario M3N 1S4 and Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport SCARLETT JANUSAS ARCHAEOLOGY INC. 269 Cameron Lake Road Tobermory, Ontario N0H 2R0 phone 519-596-8243 mobile 519-374-1119 [email protected] www.actionarchaeology.ca License # 2016-13 March 1, 2017 © ii Executive Summary The Gibraltar Point Erosion Control Project (the “Project”) will investigate the possibility of developing erosion control infrastructure along Lake Ontario shoreline in the area of Gibraltar Point, Toronto Islands. While the entire Project includes a land based portion as well, the marine archaeological assessment focused on the approximately 600 metre long shoreline and in-water areas. For the purposes of the marine archaeological assessment, the limits of the Project area will be confined to the in-water and previously lakefilled areas. The marine archaeological assessment is comprised of background research and in-water archaeological assessment extending 250 m into Lake Ontario. TRCA with support from the City of Toronto, completed an Environmental Study Report (ESR), in accordance with Conservation Ontario’s Class Environmental Assessment for Remedial Flood and Erosion Control Projects (Class EA) to develop a long‐term solution to address the shoreline erosion around Gibraltar Point (TRCA, 2008). Work was conducted under a marine archaeological license (2016-13) held by Scarlett Janusas. The field portion of the archaeological assessment was conducted over a period of days in September and October of 2016 under good conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous People of Western New York
    FACT SHEET / FEBRUARY 2018 Indigenous People of Western New York Kristin Szczepaniec Territorial Acknowledgement In keeping with regional protocol, I would like to start by acknowledging the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee and by honoring the sovereignty of the Six Nations–the Mohawk, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, Seneca and Tuscarora–and their land where we are situated and where the majority of this work took place. In this acknowledgement, we hope to demonstrate respect for the treaties that were made on these territories and remorse for the harms and mistakes of the far and recent past; and we pledge to work toward partnership with a spirit of reconciliation and collaboration. Introduction This fact sheet summarizes some of the available history of Indigenous people of North America date their history on the land as “since Indigenous people in what is time immemorial”; some archeologists say that a 12,000 year-old history on now known as Western New this continent is a close estimate.1 Today, the U.S. federal government York and provides information recognizes over 567 American Indian and Alaskan Native tribes and villages on the contemporary state of with 6.7 million people who identify as American Indian or Alaskan, alone Haudenosaunee communities. or combined.2 Intended to shed light on an often overlooked history, it The land that is now known as New York State has a rich history of First includes demographic, Nations people, many of whom continue to influence and play key roles in economic, and health data on shaping the region. This fact sheet offers information about Native people in Indigenous people in Western Western New York from the far and recent past through 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Magazine
    THE WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL MAGAZINE Volume 56 January 1973 Number 1 THE PREVOSTS OF THE ROYAL AMERICANS Edward G. Williams peldom in recorded history has there been a group of people who O surpassed in adaptability the Swiss soldiers who entered the Britisharmy in the middle of the eighteenth century expressly to serve in America against the French. Among the company of officers there stands out a family of three brothers and one nephew, all of whom were exceptional in every phase of military life and personal conduct. The brothers Prevost (pronounced Prevo) left an imprint upon the annals of the British army that would be the envy of many a family historian, and nowhere does greater interest attach to their activities than in Pennsylvania west of the Susquehanna River. In fact, there are few parts of western Europe and fewer sections of the English- speaking colonies on this side of the Atlantic Ocean where interest does not attach to their mutifaceted affairs. Ubiquity was the one attribute common to the whole group, and cosmopolitanism, linked with urbanity, was the prime quality that characterized them all. In words of modern expression, "they got around" and "they belonged" in whatever locality, situation, or society they found themselves. Certain members of the family crossed and re- crossed the ocean almost as though modern air travel existed. Two of the Prevosts married American wives, which focused upon the hus- bands an ephemeral kind of fame. Along with Henry Bouquet and Frederick Haldimand, each of the Prevosts placed his individual imprint upon the memorial records of the Royal American Regiment, the King's Royal Rifle Corps of the present day.
    [Show full text]
  • Early American History
    History 5A Bruce Dorsey MWF 11:30-12:20 Trotter 203 Trotter 214 x8095 Fall 2013 Office Hours: W. 1:30-3:30; Th. 11-12; & by appt. HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES TO 1877 This course is designed to introduce students to important themes in the history of the United States between the earliest history of European colonization in North America and the U.S. Civil War and Reconstruction. An emphasis of the course will be on the cultural history of the colonial era, the American Revolution, and the first century of the new republic. The following comprise the principal objectives of this course: • Expose students to the art of critical reading and historical analysis of primary source documents. • Allow students to develop their own interpretative frameworks for understanding the significance of various developments in the United States' first century. • Provide students with a strong conceptual background to interpret conflict and change in American culture both in the past and in the present. • Exposing students to the geography and genealogy of cultural change in America REQUIRED READINGS: The following books are available to purchase at the College Bookstore: Bruce Dorsey and Woody Register, eds., Crosscurrents in American Culture. Theda Perdue and Michael Green, eds., The Cherokee Removal. Moodle: The vast majority of the required readings for this course, as well as supplemental readings for the writing assignments, are available on the course’s Moodle site. Students are responsible for bringing copies of Crosscurrents in American Culture to every class meeting, since class discussions will focus on the interpretation and discussion of the primary- source documents in that reader.
    [Show full text]
  • American Revolution End Notes
    American Revolution End Notes 1 This article was written by Frank J Rafalko, Chief 12 Letter from George Washington to Governor Jonathan Community Training Branch, National Trumball, November 15, 1775 in which Washington Counterintelligence Center inserted the resolve of Congress he received from John Hancock regarding Church 2 Thomas Hutchinson came from a prominent New England family In 1737, despite his familys 13 This article was written by Frank J Rafalko, Chief, admonishment to him about going into politics, he was Community Training Branch, National elected to the Massachusetts House of Representative Counterintelligence Center He later served as Chief Justice of the colony and then royal governor 14 Col Jacobus Swartwout (d1826), commander of the 3 Francis Bernard was the nephew of Lord Barrington, 2d Dutchess County Regiment of Minute Men the secretary of state for war in London Barrington arranged for Bernard to be appointed as royal governor 15 Johnathan Fowler of New Jersey, but after two years Bernard move to Massachusetts to become royal governor there He was 16 James Kip recalled to London in 1769 17 This article was written by Dan Lovelace, National 4 Dr Benjamin Church Counterintelligence Center 5 AJ Langguth, Patriots The Men Who Started the 18 Carl Van Dorens description of Benedict Arnold in his American Revolution, Simon and Schuster, New York, Secret History of the American Revolution 1988, p 311 19 This article is copyrighted by Eric Evans Rafalko and 6 Edmund R Thompson, ed, Secret New England Spies used with his
    [Show full text]
  • Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} the Crossing How George Washington
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} The Crossing How George Washington Saved The American Revolution by Jim Murphy The Crossing: How George Washington Saved The American Revolution by Jim Murphy. The Crossing is a 80 page children's book that highlights the early battles of the American Revolution when George Washington is chosen to command the Continental army in 1775. Washington had some military experience but the Continental army did not and they were facing a well- trained, large British army. The British invasion begins in New York and the Continental army faced lost battles and men who deserted. As Washington's army decreased in size and he lost or retreated from battle, he was becoming increasingly worried that he might not be able to train the army to defeat the British. The decisive battle that turned the tide of the war, in favor of the Continental army took place after Washington crossed the Delaware river in the middle of the night. The Crossing is an excellent historical retelling of the beginning of the American Revolution. It is full of maps, pictures, and even gives a description of the famous painting on the cover by Emmanuel Gottlieb Leutze. If you want to know the true story of the beginning of the American Revolution told in eloquent, simplified text you need to check out The Crossing. The American army was truly the underdog in this war with the British and it makes you understand the significant odds that Washington was up against. The Crossing contains an extensive travel guide to sites of the Revolution, an index, a timeline and a list of books to continue to feed your inquisitive mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of United States Federal Indian Law and Policy
    Outline of United States federal Indian law and policy The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to United States federal Indian law and policy: Federal Indian policy – establishes the relationship between the United States Government and the Indian Tribes within its borders. The Constitution gives the federal government primary responsibility for dealing with tribes. Law and U.S. public policy related to Native Americans have evolved continuously since the founding of the United States. David R. Wrone argues that the failure of the treaty system was because of the inability of an individualistic, democratic society to recognize group rights or the value of an organic, corporatist culture represented by the tribes.[1] U.S. Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases involving Indian tribes Citizenship Adoption Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 530 U.S. _ (2013) Tribal Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) Civil rights Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978) United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313 (1978) Congressional authority Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980) California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • What Was the Iroquois Confederacy?
    04 AB6 Ch 4.11 4/2/08 11:22 AM Page 82 What was the 4 Iroquois Confederacy? Chapter Focus Questions •What was the social structure of Iroquois society? •What opportunities did people have to participate in decision making? •What were the ideas behind the government of the Iroquois Confederacy? The last chapter explored the government of ancient Athens. This chapter explores another government with deep roots in history: the Iroquois Confederacy. The Iroquois Confederacy formed hundreds of years ago in North America — long before Europeans first arrived here. The structure and principles of its government influenced the government that the United States eventually established. The Confederacy united five, and later six, separate nations. It had clear rules and procedures for making decisions through representatives and consensus. It reflected respect for diversity and a belief in the equality of people. Pause The image on the side of this page represents the Iroquois Confederacy and its five original member nations. It is a symbol as old as the Confederacy itself. Why do you think this symbol is still honoured in Iroquois society? 82 04 AB6 Ch 4.11 4/2/08 11:22 AM Page 83 What are we learning in this chapter? Iroquois versus Haudenosaunee This chapter explores the social structure of Iroquois There are two names for society, which showed particular respect for women and the Iroquois people today: for people of other cultures. Iroquois (ear-o-kwa) and Haudenosaunee It also explores the structure and processes of Iroquois (how-den-o-show-nee). government. Think back to Chapter 3, where you saw how Iroquois is a name that the social structure of ancient Athens determined the way dates from the fur trade people participated in its government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Protocols of Indian Treaties As Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (Religious Studies) Department of Religious Studies 9-2015 How to Buy a Continent: The Protocols of Indian Treaties as Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society Anthony F C Wallace University of Pennsylvania Timothy B. Powell University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/rs_papers Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, Religion Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Wallace, Anthony F C and Powell, Timothy B., "How to Buy a Continent: The Protocols of Indian Treaties as Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society" (2015). Departmental Papers (Religious Studies). 15. https://repository.upenn.edu/rs_papers/15 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/rs_papers/15 For more information, please contact [email protected]. How to Buy a Continent: The Protocols of Indian Treaties as Developed by Benjamin Franklin and Other Members of the American Philosophical Society Abstract In 1743, when Benjamin Franklin announced the formation of an American Philosophical Society for the Promotion of Useful Knowledge, it was important for the citizens of Pennsylvania to know more about their American Indian neighbors. Beyond a slice of land around Philadelphia, three quarters of the province were still occupied by the Delaware and several other Indian tribes, loosely gathered under the wing of an Indian confederacy known as the Six Nations. Relations with the Six Nations and their allies were being peacefully conducted in a series of so-called “Indian Treaties” that dealt with the fur trade, threats of war with France, settlement of grievances, and the purchase of land.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Law of the Land”
    Oneida Cultural Heritage Department By: Loretta V. Metoxen Edit, Revision, and Layout: Tiffany Schultz (09/13) “The Law of the Land” All treaties “shall be the supreme law of the land;…anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.” From the United States Constitution, Article VI. payments for all time to come. But the Oneida TREATIES THEN AND THEIR IMPACT leadership of the time rejected all offers and held NOW on to the Treaty Rights so that the Treaty of The Oneidas were party to the several Canandaigua is as valid today is it was when it Five Nations who were trading with them or was made more than two hundred years ago. attempting settlement in or near their ancient Furthermore, Article II of the Treaty of lands as early as 1613. The state of New York, Canandaigua was an important argument upon as one of the thirteen colonies of the Continental which the Supreme Court of the United States, Congress also treated with the Haudenosaunee— in 1985, determined that the Oneidas have collectively and separately. aboriginal title to the 270,000 acre reservation in The United States, after adoption of the mid-state New York. Constitution in 1789, also concluded treaties with the Oneidas and others of the Five Nations TREATY WITH THE SIX NATIONS, 1794 for cession of land, peace and friendship and to recognize services of the Tribes to the fledgling country. The Treaty with the Six Nations of 1794 is also referred to as the Treaty of Canandaigua (place of agreement) or The Pickering Treaty with reference to the United States Commissioner present.
    [Show full text]