DOCSLIB.ORG

Poverty, Forest Dependence and Migration in Forest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Poverty, Forest Dependence and Migration in Forest Poverty, Forest Dependence and Migration in the Forest Communities of Turkey Evidence and policy impact analysis POVERTY, FOREST DEPENDENCE AND MIGRATION IN THE FOREST COMMUNITIES OF TURKEY A B POVERTY, FOREST DEPENDENCE AND MIGRATION IN THE FOREST COMMUNITIES OF TURKEY Poverty, Forest Dependence and Migration in the Forest Communities of Turkey Evidence and policy impact analysis JUNE, 2017 Acknowledgements This paper was prepared by a combined team1 of World Bank staff and consultants, working with local Turkish consultants and stakeholders in close collaboration.2 The team would like to acknowledge the efforts of UDA Consulting in Turkey for the survey’s design and implementation. The team would like to acknowledge the support and design contributions of the Program for Forests (PROFOR), who also funded this study. Additionally, the team would like to acknowledge the cooperation of the General Directorate of Forestry (GDF), who provided guidance and the oversight of information that led to the construction of the survey and sample design. The findings from this paper form an integral part of a much broader engagement with the Turkish GDF through a jointly-produced Forest Policy Note. 1 The Team comprised: Craig M. Meisner (World Bank, Task Team Leader and Sr Environmental Economist), Limin Wang (World Bank, Consultant), Raisa Chandrashekhar Behal (World Bank, Consultant), and Priya Shyamsundar (World Bank, Consultant), Andrew Mitchell (World Bank, Sr Forestry Specialist), and Esra Arikan (World Bank, Sr Environmental Specialist). 2 Local Turkish collaborators included: UDA Consulting for survey implementation and the Central Union of Turkish Forestry Cooperatives (OR-KOOP). CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 7 2. Forests and Forestry Institutions in Turkey.......................................................................................................... 9 2.1. Forest Resources ................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.1. Non-wood Forest Products (NWFPs) ............................................................................................. 10 2.1.2. Ecosystem Services .................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.3. Economic Value of Ecosystem Services .......................................................................................... 12 2.2. Forest Institutions, Legislative and Policy Framework ................................................................................ 12 2.2.1. Institutional Framework ............................................................................................................... 12 2.2.2. Forest Villages .......................................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3. Historical Support to Forest Villages .............................................................................................. 14 2.2.4. Other Key Stakeholders .............................................................................................................. 16 2.2.5. Legislation ................................................................................................................................ 17 2.2.6. Policy Framework ...................................................................................................................... 18 3. Socio-Economic Conditions In Turkey’s Forest Villages ....................................................................................... 19 3.1. Socio-economic Household Survey ....................................................................................................... 19 3.1.1. Socio-demographic Conditions .................................................................................................... 21 3.1.2. Income Sources ........................................................................................................................ 21 3.1.3. Income Diversification and Forest Dependency ................................................................................ 22 3.1.4. Poverty in Forest Villages ............................................................................................................. 23 3.1.5. Differences between the Poor and Non-poor .................................................................................. 24 4. Forest Resource Use and Management .......................................................................................................... 27 4.1. Income by Product .............................................................................................................................. 27 4.2. Forest Resource Dependency: Energy, Health and Housing ...................................................................... 28 4.3. Forest and Pasture Management .......................................................................................................... 28 5. Analysing Migration Decisions ....................................................................................................................... 30 5.1. Descriptive Statistics of Migrant Households in the SEHS ......................................................................... 30 5.2. Factors Influencing Household Migration Decisions ................................................................................. 32 5.3. Simulating Effects on the Migration Decision .......................................................................................... 33 6. Pathways Out of Poverty ............................................................................................................................ 34 6.1. Variation of Participation across Income Quintiles .................................................................................. 35 6.2. Determinants of Income ....................................................................................................................... 35 7. Interpreting the Results ................................................................................................................................. 37 7.1. Assessing the Poverty Impacts of Policies ............................................................................................... 38 8. Conclusions and Policy Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 41 References ..................................................................................................................................................... 43 Appendix 1: ORKOY – terms and conditions of support ........................................................................................ 45 Appendix 2: Migration analysis......................................................................................................................... 48 Appendix 3: Income regressions, by source ........................................................................................................ 49 Appendix 4: Proportion of household asset ownership ......................................................................................... 50 POVERTY, FOREST DEPENDENCE AND MIGRATION IN THE FOREST COMMUNITIES OF TURKEY 1 Figures Figure 2-1 Turkey’s Forest Cover .......................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 2-2 Active Management of NWFPs in 13 European Regions ....................................................................... 11 Figure 2-3 Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs ................................................................................................ 12 Figure 3-1 Randomized Sample of Forest Villages Surveyed ................................................................................. 20 Figure 3-2 Income Diversification ....................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 3-3 Common Combinations of Income Sources (% of households) ................................................................ 22 Figure 4-1 Percentage of Households Collecting Forest Products ............................................................................ 27 Tables Table 2-1 Forest Area and Growing Stock .......................................................................................................... 10 Table 2-2 Support to Forest Villages (FTE = Fulltime Equivalent) .............................................................................. 14 Table 2-3 Historical Development of Forest Legal and Regulatory Framework .......................................................... 17 Table 3-1 Survey Sample .................................................................................................................................. 19 Table 3-2 Household Demographics and Employment Status by Poverty and Migration Area ..................................... 20 Table 3-3 Household Average Income by Source and Participation ........................................................................ 21 Table 3-4 Forest Village
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COULD POVERTY BE TURNED INTO PROSPERITY and POOR INTO RICH in TURKEY’S REALITY? Asst
    Niğde Üniversitesi, İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 2010, Cilt:3, Sayı:2, s.135-161. 135 COULD POVERTY BE TURNED INTO PROSPERITY and POOR INTO RICH IN TURKEY’S REALITY? Asst. Assoc. Dr. Haldun SOYDAL1 Asst. Assoc. Dr. Serkan GÜZEL2 Res. Assist. M. Göktuğ KAYA3 ABSTRACT Arguments not only over the poverty of individuals but also over the poverty of groups, communities, nations, and countries have begun to make several kind of poverties, including individualistic, economical, regional, cultural, the main point of the escalating studies. In this sense, the main aim of this paper representing a significant indicator for studies mentioned above is determining the concept of poor and poverty, unveiling underlying factors of poverty and putting forth how to cope with poverty. One the the most crucial result of this paper highlighting the role of Turkey‟s policy that make inequality of income distribution, black economy and irregularity legislative is closely linked with the political conciousness that will be able to turn poverty into prosperity in general and poor into rich in particular in the reality of Turkey, via distributing internal revenue as regards contribution of individuals, groups, social classes and via improving national capital. Keywords: Poverty, Poor, Poverty Line, Struggle Against Poverty. JEL Codes: I38, A14, H11 ÖZET Sadece bireylerin değil aynı zamanda grup, topluluk, ulus ve ülkelerin yoksulluğu üzerine tartıĢmalar, bireysel, ekonomik, bölgesel, kültürel pek çok yoksulluk çeĢidini giderek artan çalıĢmaların temel hareket noktası haline getirmeye baĢlamıĢtır. Bu anlamda sözü edilen çalıĢmalara anlamlı bir gösterge oluĢturan bu çalıĢmanın temel amacı, yoksul ve yoksulluk kavramlarını saptamak, yoksulluğun nedenlerini açığa çıkarmak ve yoksulluğun üstesinden nasıl gelineceğini öne sürmektir.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Shelterwood Logging Maintain Herb Layer Diversity in a Beech Forest in Turkey?
    Yılmaz - Yılmaz: Herb layer diversity in a beech forest in Turkey - 487 - CAN SHELTERWOOD LOGGING MAINTAIN HERB LAYER DIVERSITY IN A BEECH FOREST IN TURKEY? YILMAZ, O. Y.1* – YILMAZ, H.2 1Department of Surveying and Cadastre, Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul 34473, Turkey 2Ornamental Plant Cultivation Program, Vocational School of Forestry, Istanbul University- Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul 34473, Turkey (phone: +90-212-338-2400; fax: +90-212-338-2428) *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected]; phone: +90-212-338-2400; fax: +90-212-226-1113 (Received 9th Sep 2019; accepted 15th Nov 2019) Abstract. The abundance and diversity of forest understory vegetation can be significantly impacted by forest management. Besides having a wide geographical distribution in Turkey, the Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) is also one of the economically important timber species of the country. The aim of this study is to compare the understory herb layer communities of mature and young beech stands which regenerated as a result of the shelterwood method. We studied understory plant species diversity and composition in 16 plots in old and young beech stands in Belgrad Forest near İstanbul, Turkey. We found no significant differences between the two stand types in understory plant diversity but understory species compositions in two stand types were found to be different. Our finding can be useful for forest management planning; by focusing on stand scale to achieve forest management conserving understory plant diversity in a forest. Keywords: Belgrad Forest, understory composition, indicator species, pure beech stands, stand age Introduction Herb layer vegetation is an important component for biodiversity conservation efforts because it contains the majority of vascular plant species diversity and plays a significant role in forest ecosystem functioning (Augusto et al., 2003; Lorenz et al., 2006; Gilliam, 2007; Ellum, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Intertemporal Poverty in Turkey
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Economics and Finance 30 ( 2015 ) 487 – 497 3rd Economics & Finance Conference, Rome, Italy, April 14-17, 2015 and 4th Economics & Finance Conference, London, UK, August 25-28, 2015 Intertemporal poverty in Turkey Ömer Limanlıa,* a Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin 08600, Turkey Abstract Poverty is generally considered as a static fact. Economics literature caters us several poverty indexes that measure aggregate poverty from cross-sectional data sets. These cross-sectional data sets and poverty indexes would not provide any information about the dynamic side of poverty. Some households/people might stay poor longer than others, some households/people might move to certain poverty line from the bottom part of income distribution while the others might stay at the bottom part of income distribution forever. Early poverty indexes are insensitive to these aspects of poverty. Taking into account these all, in this study, we have investigated about the intertemporal poverty in Turkey. We have used newly developed intertemporal poverty indexes and estimated the determinants of staying poor in Turkey by using panel data set Income and Living Conditions Survey for 2006-2009 . In accordance with the final results, some economic policy recommendations are given to solve the poverty issue in Turkey. © 20152015 TheThe Authors. Authors. Published Published by by Elsevier Elsevier B.V. B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of IISES-International Institute for Social and Economics Sciences. Peer-review under responsibility of IISES-International Institute for Social and Economics Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • D. Main Contributors to Poverty Reduction Capacity, and Labor Market Outcomes Are High and Persistent
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Systematic Country Diagnostic Turkey’s Future Transitions Public Disclosure Authorized Towards Sustainable Poverty Reduction and Shared Prosperity Public Disclosure Authorized II III Turkey’s Future Transitions Towards Sustainable Poverty Reduction and Shared Prosperity Systematic Country Diagnostic October 12, 2016 IV V ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AFAD Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency BEEPS Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice CPI Consumer Price Index ECA Europe and Central Asia ECE Early Childhood Education EE Energy Efficiency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMRA Energy Market Regulatory Authority EPIAS Energy Exchange EU European Union FDI Foreign Direct Investment GDP Gross Domestic Product GNI Gross National Income HBS Household Budget Survey IRA Independent Regulatory Agency LFP Labor Force Participation LFS Labor Force Survey LNG Liquefied Natural Gas LPI Logistics Performance Index NUTS2 Nomenclature of Territorial Units OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PFMC Public Financial Management and Control PISA Program for International Student Assessment PMR Product Market Regulation PPL Public Procurement Law PPP Purchasing Power Parity R&D Research and Development Vice Presidents: Cyril Muller, Dimitris Tsitsiragos SCD Systematic Country Diagnostic IBRD Country Director: Johannes Zutt SILC Survey on Income and Living Conditions IFC Regional Director:
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty Trends in Turkey IZA DP No
    IZA DP No. 7823 Poverty Trends in Turkey Sirma Demir Șeker Stephen P. Jenkins December 2013 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Poverty Trends in Turkey Sirma Demir Șeker Ministry of Development, Ankara Stephen P. Jenkins London School of Economics, University of Essex and IZA Discussion Paper No. 7823 December 2013 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Zakat Potential in Reducing Poverty in Turkey Niyazi
    International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 2019/2: 90-110 The Role of Zakat Potential in Reducing Poverty in Turkey Niyazi Gümüş * Fatih Yardımcıoğlu** Nurullah Altıntaş*** Received: 11.06.2019 Accepted: 27.07.2019 DOI: 10.25272/ijisef.575488 Type: Research Article Abstract Poverty has been the leading social and economic problem of societies both in the past and today for the decades. This study examines the status of poverty in the Turkish economy and the role of zakat in poverty reduction. The zakat potential is analyzed in three methods and it is concluded that poverty in Turkey could be completely resolved via a potential zakat fund. It is suggested that to reduce poverty in Turkey, zakat should be enforced by favor of the state and it should be based on institutional foundations. Keywords: Poverty, Reduction Poverty, Zakat, Zakat Potential Jel Codes: E62, I31, P24, Z12. * PhD Student, Sakarya University, Institute of Social Sciences, E-mail:[email protected]; This study is derived from the doctoral dissertation titled “A solution to poverty reduction: an example of a zakat fund”, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3928-6937 **Assoc. Professor, Sakarya University, Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of Public Finance, E- mail: [email protected], ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7758-8549 ***Assistant Professor, Sakarya University, Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of Economics, E- mail: [email protected], ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9425-3516 Uluslararası İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2019/2: 90-110 90 The Role of Zakat Potential in Reducing Poverty in Turkey Introduction Poverty has been the leading fundamental problem since the beginning of the history of humanity, and even today, societies try to overcome it.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Selection of Small Mammals in a Mixed Forest in Turkey - 133
    Bulut et al.: Habitat selection of small mammals in a mixed forest in turkey - 133 - HABITAT SELECTION OF SMALL MAMMALS IN A MIXED FOREST IN TURKEY BULUT, Ş.1* – KARATAŞ, A.2 – AYAŞ, Z.3 1Hitit University, Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Çorum, Turkey 2Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Department of Biology, Niğde, Turkey 3Hacettepe University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Ankara, Turkey *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected]; phone: +90-364-227-7000 (Received 25th May 2020; accepted 19th Nov 2020) Abstract. Small mammals is a non-taxonomic subgroup named on the basis of body size of individuals. This study was created from data obtained through the mark-recapture method of small terrestrial mammals in Populus tremula, thermophilic deciduous, steppes, conifer plantations and Abies sp. forest habitats in Turkey. Field studies were performed for a total of 14 months in 2014 and 2015. 758 individuals from seven species were captured in a total of 5250 days in trapping grid studies conducted in a total of 5 different types of habitat by a grid of 5 × 5 traps system. The average capture success in all was calculated as 14.44%. The species affected by temperature data were M. glareolus and D. nitedula. It was found that M. subterraneus showing increasing populations was negatively correlated with temperature. When considering the sex ratios, M. glareolus was under intense male pressure in steppe habitat. Indicator species were determined numerically and M. glareolus, M. subterraneus and D. nitedula were found to be decisive species for different habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Future Transitions
    _______________________________________________________________ Public Disclosure Authorized Turkey’s Future Transitions _______________________________________________________________ Republic of Turkey Systematic Country Diagnostic Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 112785-TR October 12, 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized _______________________________________________________________ CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate as of May 1, 2016) Currency Unit Turkish Lira US$1.00 TL 2.86 Weights and Measures: Metric System ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AFAD Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency BEEPS Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice CPI Consumer Price Index ECA Europe and Central Asia ECE Early Childhood Education EE Energy Efficiency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMRA Energy Market Regulatory Authority EPIAS Energy Exchange EU European Union FDI Foreign Direct Investment GDP Gross Domestic Product GNI Gross National Income HBS Household Budget Survey IRA Independent Regulatory Agency LFP Labor Force Participation LFS Labor Force Survey LNG Liquefied Natural Gas LPI Logistics Performance Index NUTS2 Nomenclature of Territorial Units OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PFMC Public Financial Management and Control PISA Program for International Student Assessment PMR Product Market Regulation PPL Public Procurement Law PPP Purchasing Power Parity R&D Research and Development SCD Systematic
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Biological Conservation 144 (2011) 2752–2769 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Review Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis ⇑ Çag˘an H. Sßekerciog˘lu a,b, , Sean Anderson c, Erol Akçay d, Rasßit Bilgin e, Özgün Emre Can f, Gürkan Semiz g, Çag˘atay Tavsßanog˘lu h, Mehmet Baki Yokesß i, Anıl Soyumert h, Kahraman Ipekdal_ j, Ismail_ K. Sag˘lam k, Mustafa Yücel l, H. Nüzhet Dalfes m a Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0840, USA b KuzeyDog˘a Derneg˘i, Ismail_ Aytemiz Caddesi 161/2, 36200 Kars, Turkey c Environmental Science and Resource Management Program, 1 University Drive, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA 93012, USA d National Institute
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Legality Risk Assessment Turkey
    Timber Legality Risk Assessment Turkey Version 1.0 l September 2018 <MONTH> <YEAR> COUNTRY RISK ASSESSMENTS This risk assessment has been developed by NEPCon with support from the LIFE programme of the European Union, UK aid from the UK government and FSCTM. www.nepcon.org/sourcinghub NEPCon has adopted an “open source” policy to share what we develop to advance sustainability. This work is published under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 license. Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this document, to deal in the document without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, and/or distribute copies of the document, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the document. We would appreciate receiving a copy of any modified version. Disclaimers This Risk Assessment has been produced for educational and informational purposes only. NEPCon is not liable for any reliance placed on this document, or any financial or other loss caused as a result of reliance on information contained herein. The information contained in the Risk Assessment is accurate, to the best of NEPCon’s knowledge, as of the publication date The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute endorsement of the contents which reflect the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. This material has been funded by the UK aid from the UK government; however, the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government’s official policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey’S Globally Important Biodiversity in Crisis
    Biological Conservation 144 (2011) 2752–2769 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Review Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis ⇑ Çag˘an H. Sßekerciog˘lu a,b, , Sean Anderson c, Erol Akçay d, Rasßit Bilgin e, Özgün Emre Can f, Gürkan Semiz g, Çag˘atay Tavsßanog˘lu h, Mehmet Baki Yokesß i, Anıl Soyumert h, Kahraman Ipekdal_ j, Ismail_ K. Sag˘lam k, Mustafa Yücel l, H. Nüzhet Dalfes m a Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0840, USA b KuzeyDog˘a Derneg˘i, Ismail_ Aytemiz Caddesi 161/2, 36200 Kars, Turkey c Environmental Science and Resource Management Program, 1 University Drive, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA 93012, USA d National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS), University of Tennessee, 1534 White Ave., Suite 400, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA e Institute of Environmental Sciences, Bog˘aziçi University, 34342 Bebek, Istanbul,_ Turkey f WildCRU, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, OXON.OX13 5QL, Oxford, UK g Department of Biology, Pamukkale University, Kınıklı Campus, 20017 Kınıklı, Denizli, Turkey h Division of Ecology, Department of Biology, Hacettepe University, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey i Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Haliç University, Sıracevizler Cd. No: 29, 34381 Bomonti, Istanbul,_ Turkey j Department of Biology, Ahi Evran University, Asßık Pasßa Kampüsü, Kırsßehir, Turkey k Ecological Sciences Research Laboratories, Department of Biology, Hacettepe University, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey l Université Pierre et Marie Curie – Paris 6, Observatoire Océanologique, 66650 Banyuls-sur-mer, France m Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Istanbul_ Technical University, 34469 Sarıyer, Istanbul,_ Turkey article info abstract Article history: Turkey (Türkiye) lies at the nexus of Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia and Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Levy Institute Measure of Time and Consumption Poverty for Turkey
    TIME DEFICITS AND POVERTY The Levy Institute Measure of Time and Consumption Poverty for Turkey Ajit Zacharias, Thomas Masterson, and Emel Memis¸ January 2014 1 Final Report Empowered lives. Resilient nations. 1 Draft: Please do not quote or cite without permission of the authors. Time Deficits and Poverty The Levy Institute Measure of Time and Consumption Poverty for Turkey Ajit Zacharias,Thomas Masterson, and Emel Memiş January 2014 Final Report* * Draft. Please do not quote or cite without permission of the authors. Contents List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. iii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... iv Preface ......................................................................................................................................................... vi Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... vii 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 2 BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................... 3 2.2 Trends in Employment, Income and Poverty ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]