DOCSLIB.ORG

The Case of Standing Bear: Establishing Personhood Under the Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Case of Standing Bear: Establishing Personhood Under the Law University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association American Judges Association 2009 The Case of Standing Bear: Establishing Personhood under the Law Joe Starita University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ajacourtreview Starita, Joe, "The Case of Standing Bear: Establishing Personhood under the Law" (2009). Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association. 287. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ajacourtreview/287 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the American Judges Association at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Case of Standing Bear: Establishing Personhood under the Law Joe Starita t ten o’clock on the morning of May 1, 1879, in Omaha, Yes, for the most part, the witness said. Nebraska, U.S. District Court Judge Elmer Dundy’s The young agency store clerk left the stand and Lieutenant Agavel smacked against a wooden bench and the trial of Carpenter, the arresting officer, was sworn in as the second Ma-chu-nah-zha v. George Crook1 was officially underway. witness. Standing Bear’s attorney again focused on dress and Delayed by heavy spring rains and widespread flooding, the work habits. judge had just arrived from Lincoln the night before, but now When you arrested the prisoners, he asked, were they wear- he was settled at the bench and he asked the attorneys repre- ing citizens’ clothing? senting Standing Bear to call their first witness. The lieutenant said the majority of the men were – only two Willie W. Hamilton, the son of the missionary on the wore blankets and leggings. And two of the sick Indians had Omaha Reservation, approached the stand. Hamilton, 22, had recently said they wanted to go to work. lived on the reservation for 12 years, working at the agency The general’s lawyer approached, focusing again on loyalty store for the past six. He spoke both Omaha and Ponca fluently to the chiefs. and had first met the prisoners when they arrived on Omaha “How many chiefs are there?” Lambertson asked. Reservation land two months earlier. The younger of Standing The judge: “Why is that material?” Bear’s two attorneys, John Lee Webster, began the questioning, The district attorney: “To show that these Indians have their asking the witness to describe the condition of the prisoners. chiefs, to whom they profess allegiance.” When the prisoners first arrived on the morning of March With that, the trial recessed for lunch, resuming again at 2 4, Hamilton testified, they were in bad shape. Those who had p.m. When the plaintiffs announced the name of their third them wore white man’s clothes. They lived as families, as man witness, the government lawyer jumped to his feet. and wife, with their children – two of whom were orphans. “Does this court think an Indian is a competent witness?” What did they do after they arrived? Attorney Webster Lambertson asked. asked. “They are competent for every purpose in both civil and All the healthy ones began to break ground and sow crops, criminal courts,” the judge replied. “The law makes no dis- mostly wheat, the witness replied. tinction on account of race, color, or previous condition.” Did any of the prisoners put in a crop for themselves? Standing Bear approached the bench. He took the oath and Buffalo Chip had put in four or five acres of wheat on land the store clerk, Hamilton, was sworn in as interpreter. Webster the Omaha gave him. asked the questions and, sentence by sentence, the store clerk On that Sunday, the attorney asked, were the prisoners rest- translated the testimony from Ponca to English. ing on the Sabbath or working? How had things been for them on their old reservation on The judge: “Is that necessary?” the Niobrara? Webster asked. The attorney: “The theory of this government is to “We lived well,” Standing Bear said. “I had my own land, Christianize these Indians, I believe.” and raised enough so I could get along nicely. My children The witness: “It is about the same as it is with white men, were going to school, we had a good school, and everything some do, and some do not.” going nicely.” When his opponent finished, Genio Lambertson had some Were they becoming civilized up on the Niobrara? questions for the witness on behalf of the government and his “He says he wants to work, and become like a white man, client, General Crook. Young and brash, Lambertson was try- and that he has tried his best.” ing his first case as the newly minted district attorney. How were things in the Warm Country? When the prisoners were on the Omaha Reservation, “I couldn’t plow, I couldn’t sow any wheat, and we all got Lambertson asked, who was their chief? sick, and couldn’t do anything….Instead of our tribe becoming Standing Bear was the head chief, the witness replied. prosperous, they died off every day during the time. From the “Did they obey his orders?” time I went down there until I left, 158 of us died.” “Yes, sir.” The witness looked up at the judge. The district attorney asked if they depended on the govern- “I thought to myself, God wants me to live, and I think if I ment for their wagons, clothes and blankets. come back to my old reservation he will let me live. I got as far Authors’ Note: This article is excerpted from JOE STARITA, “I AM A Footnotes MAN:” CHIEF STANDING BEAR’S JOURNEY FOR JUSTICE (Chapter 6, “The 1. United States ex rel. Standing Bear v. Crook, 25 F.Cas. 695 Color of Blood”) (2008), reprinted with permission of the publisher, (C.C.D.Neb. 1879) (No. 14,891). St. Martin’s Press. 4 Court Review - Volume 45 as the Omahas, and they brought me down here,” he said, his down to one essential issue: [H]is son when he voice getting louder and stronger. “What I have done? I am Had the Ponca prisoners gen- brought here, but what have I done? I don’t know.” uinely expatriated themselves died made him Standing Bear got up from his chair and began to gesture, from their tribal past and promise... he speaking louder to the faces staring back from the sides, the become firmly lodged on civi- would take his back and the benches. “It seems as though I haven’t a place in lization’s path? If so, then they the world, no place to go, and no home to go to, but when I were entitled to the protection bones there and see your faces here, I think some of you are trying to help me, of the Fourteenth Amendment bury him, and so that I can get a place sometime to live in, and when it comes and the government had no that he has got my time to die, to die peacefully and happy.” business trying to deprive The judge told the interpreter to tell the witness not to get them of life, liberty and prop- his bones in a too excited, to stay calm. Standing Bear sat back down. His erty. If not, then they were gov- box, and... he will lawyer turned to the interpreter. ernment wards who had ille- bury his bones “Ask him how many of his children died in the Indian gally left their reservation and there.... Territory before he came away?” it was the military’s duty to “He says two died down there. He says his son could talk return them to the Indian English and write, and was a great help to him…and whenever Territory. he thinks of it, it makes him feel bad.” Promptly at ten the next morning, the younger lawyer, Does he still consider himself the chief of his people? Webster, still a bit under the weather, began to lay out his case “He says he didn’t consider himself a chief…He says he felt in support of the Indian prisoners. First of all, he told the himself to be as poor as the rest of them.” judge, the Omaha legally owned their reservation and, as such, The general’s lawyer approached the witness. He told the had every right to share the land with their Ponca friends and interpreter to ask if he was the chief of those Ponca now in the relatives. Standing Bear and the Ponca did not want the gov- north or any of those in the Territory? ernment’s help. They simply wanted their own land and the “He says, I was not the head man; I don’t consider myself chance to work it and become self-supporting. They cannot, he any better than they are.” stressed, be moved “at the whim and pleasure of the commis- The district attorney wanted to know if the government fur- sioner at Washington” who does not have “the power to move nished them with wagons and farming tools. the Indians when and where he pleases.” In fact, the govern- “He says they got some wagons and some mowing ment’s behavior in this case, he told the judge, openly defies machines.” the philosophy of the nation’s third President, who, in a letter Did they escape from the Territory in government-issued to an Indian chief in 1803, had said, “these lands can never go wagons? from you but when you wish to sell.” Thomas Jefferson also Two were government-issued.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Afraid of Bear to Zuni: Surnames in English of Native American Origin Found Within
    RAYNOR MEMORIAL LIBRARIES Indian origin names, were eventually shortened to one-word names, making a few indistinguishable from names of non-Indian origin. Name Categories: Personal and family names of Indian origin contrast markedly with names of non-Indian Afraid of Bear to Zuni: Surnames in origin. English of Native American Origin 1. Personal and family names from found within Marquette University Christian saints (e.g. Juan, Johnson): Archival Collections natives- rare; non-natives- common 2. Family names from jobs (e.g. Oftentimes names of Native Miller): natives- rare; non-natives- American origin are based on objects common with descriptive adjectives. The 3. Family names from places (e.g. following list, which is not Rivera): natives- rare; non-native- comprehensive, comprises common approximately 1,000 name variations in 4. Personal and family names from English found within the Marquette achievements, attributes, or incidents University archival collections. The relating to the person or an ancestor names originate from over 50 tribes (e.g. Shot with two arrows): natives- based in 15 states and Canada. Tribal yes; non-natives- yes affiliations and place of residence are 5. Personal and family names from noted. their clan or totem (e.g. White bear): natives- yes; non-natives- no History: In ancient times it was 6. Personal or family names from customary for children to be named at dreams and visions of the person or birth with a name relating to an animal an ancestor (e.g. Black elk): natives- or physical phenominon. Later males in yes; non-natives- no particular received names noting personal achievements, special Tribes/ Ethnic Groups: Names encounters, inspirations from dreams, or are expressed according to the following physical handicaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Voices Teacher Guide
    Teacher Guide for High School for use with the educational DVD Contemporary Voices along the Lewis & Clark Trail First Edition The Regional Learning Project collaborates with tribal educators to produce top quality, primary resource materials about Native Americans, Montana, and regional history. Bob Boyer, Kim Lugthart, Elizabeth Sperry, Sally Thompson © 2008 Regional Learning Project, The University of Montana, Center for Continuing Education Regional Learning Project at the University of Montana–Missoula grants teachers permission to photocopy the activity pages from this book for classroom use. No other part of this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of the publisher. For more information regarding permission, write to Regional Learning Project, UM Continuing Education, Missoula, MT 59812. Acknowledgements Regional Learning Project extends grateful acknowledgement to the tribal representatives contributing to this project. The following is a list of those appearing in the DVD, from interviews conducted by Sally Thompson, Ph.D. Lewis Malatare (Yakama) Lee Bourgeau (Nez Perce) Allen Pinkham (Nez Perce) Julie Cajune (Salish) Pat Courtney Gold (Wasco) Maria Pascua (Makah) Armand Minthorn (Cayuse/Nez Perce) Cecelia Bearchum (Walla Walla/Yakama) Vernon Finley (Kootenai) Otis Halfmoon (Nez Perce) Louis Adams (Salish) Kathleen Gordon (Cayuse/Walla Walla) Felix
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of United States Federal Indian Law and Policy
    Outline of United States federal Indian law and policy The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to United States federal Indian law and policy: Federal Indian policy – establishes the relationship between the United States Government and the Indian Tribes within its borders. The Constitution gives the federal government primary responsibility for dealing with tribes. Law and U.S. public policy related to Native Americans have evolved continuously since the founding of the United States. David R. Wrone argues that the failure of the treaty system was because of the inability of an individualistic, democratic society to recognize group rights or the value of an organic, corporatist culture represented by the tribes.[1] U.S. Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases involving Indian tribes Citizenship Adoption Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 530 U.S. _ (2013) Tribal Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) Civil rights Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978) United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313 (1978) Congressional authority Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980) California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Overview
    Indian Claims Insight Historical Overview The Constitution of the U.S. authorizes the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties. The removal of Indian Nations from American lands desired by white settlers was grounded in the treaty- making process. This practice continued a policy established in colonial times, under which white European settlers sought to usurp Native American lands through a process of negotiation rather than direct conquest. The Constitution expressly prohibits the States from entering into treaties or alliances and makes no distinction between treaty making involving foreign nations and treaty making with Native Americans, although it does make a distinction between foreign nations and Indian tribes in the language empowering Congress to regulate commerce. The earliest treaties refer to “Indian Nations” or “Indian tribes.” Of all the treaties signed, most involved Native American lands, Indian removal or resettlement, or clarification of boundaries between white settlements and Indian lands. Despite the fact that treaty making process between the U.S. Government and the Indian Nations/Tribes was overwhelmingly skewed to favor U.S. territorial expansion, Indian removal, and white settlement of lands previously occupied by Native Americans, it is the grounding of the territorial expansion in the treaty-making process that provided the only hope for Native Americans to seek redress. The following timeline highlights major events impacting the history of Indian claims 1789-present. 1 Treaty signed by George Treaty Making Period 1789-1871 Washington 1817 Secret articles of the Treaty of On Dec. 2, 1817 in his annual address to Congress, President James Monroe Peace and Friendship between the provided examples of Government actions involving the purchase of Indian U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Gendered Ideals in the Autobiographies of Charles Eastman and Luther Standing Bear
    Compromising and Accommodating Dominant Gendered Ideologies: The Effectiveness of Using Nineteenth-century Indian Boarding school Autobiographies as Tools of Protest Sineke Elzinga S1012091 M North American Studies 24 June 2019 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Hans Bak Second Reader: Dr. Mathilde Roza NORTH AMERICAN STUDIES Teacher who will receive this document: Prof. Dr. Hans Bak and Dr. Mathilde Roza Title of document: Compromising and Accommodating Dominant Gendered Ideologies: The Effectiveness of Using Nineteenth-century Indian Boarding school Autobiographies as Tools of Protest Name of course: Master Thesis Date of submission: 25 June 2019 The work submitted here is the sole responsibility of the undersigned, who has neither committed plagiarism nor colluded in its production. Signed Name of student: Sineke Elzinga Student number: S1012091 Abstract Gendered ideals dominant in nineteenth-century America have been significantly different from gendered ideals in Native American communities. In using their Indian boarding schools autobiographies as tools of protest, these Native writers had to compromise and accommodate these gendered ideals dominant in American society. This thesis analyzes how Zitkála-Šá, Luther Standing Bear and Charles Eastman have used the gendered ideals concerning the public and domestic sphere, emotion and reason in writing, and ideas about individuality and analyzes how this has affected the effectiveness of using their autobiographies as tools of protest for their people. Keywords Indian boarding school autobiographies,
    [Show full text]
  • What Sort of Indian Will Show the Way? Colonization, Mediation, and Interpretation in the Sun Dance Contact Zone
    WHAT SORT OF INDIAN WILL SHOW THE WAY? COLONIZATION, MEDIATION, AND INTERPRETATION IN THE SUN DANCE CONTACT ZONE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sandra Garner, B.A., M.A. Graduate Program in Comparative Studies The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Lindsay Jones, Advisor Maurice Stevens Richard Shiels Copyright by Sandra Garner 2010 ABSTRACT This research project focuses on the Sun Dance, an Indigenous ritual particularly associated with Siouan people, as a site of cultural expression where multiple, often conflicting concerns, compete for hegemonic dominance. Since European contact the Sun Dance has been variously practiced, suppressed, reclaimed, revitalized, and transformed. It has also evoked strong sentiments both from those that sought to eradicate its practices as well as those who have sought its continuance. In spite of a period of intense colonial repression, during the last three decades the Siouan form of the Sun Dance has become one of the most widely practiced religious rituals from Indigenous North America and the number of Sun Dances held and the numbers of people participating has grown significantly. How has the Sun Dance ritual endured in spite of a lengthy history of repression? What is it about the Sun Dance that evokes such powerful sentiments? And, how do we account for the growth of the Sun Dance. I argue that the current growth and practice of the Sun Dance must be considered within the context of colonialism; a central focus of this dissertation. I identify the complex and messy ways that individuals mediate the inequitable power relations that shape colonialist interactions, as well as the way they interpret these social spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribes of Oklahoma – Request for Information for Teachers (Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies, OSDE)
    Tribes of Oklahoma – Request for Information for Teachers (Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies, OSDE) Tribe:_____Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma__________________ Tribal website(s): http//www.ponca.com_________________________ 1. Migration/movement/forced removal Oklahoma History C3 Standard 2.3 “Integrate visual and textual evidence to explain the reasons for and trace the migrations of Native American peoples including the Five Tribes into present-day Oklahoma, the Indian Removal Act of 1830, and tribal resistance to the forced relocations.” Oklahoma History C3 Standard 2.7 “Compare and contrast multiple points of view to evaluate the impact of the Dawes Act which resulted in the loss of tribal communal lands and the redistribution of lands by various means including land runs as typified by the Unassigned Lands and the Cherokee Outlet, lotteries, and tribal allotments.” Original Homeland – present day Kentucky, Indiana, and Nebraska Location in Oklahoma – North central Oklahoma primarily in Kay County Traditionally the Ponca share common social and cultural characteristics with the Omaha, Osage, Kaw and Quapaw peoples. They once lived in the area of northern Kentucky and southern Indiana along the Ohio River, then migrated west into what is today known as Nebraska. The Ponca first encountered Europeans in 1789 when they lived in villages along Ponca Creek near the Niobrara River in northeastern Nebraska. Despite several treaties with the U.S., in 1868 due to an “administrative blunder” by federal agents, the entire Ponca Reservation was given to the Sioux. When the error was discovered, the U.S. government chose to remove the Poncas south to Indian Territory rather than admit the mistake.
    [Show full text]
  • Osage Nation of Oklahoma
    United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Washington, DC 20240 JUN 26 2020 The Honorable Geoffrey Standing Bear Principal Chief, Osage Nation 627 Grandview Pawhuska, Oklahoma 74056 Dear Principal Chief Standing Bear: In 2016, the Osage Nation (Nation) submitted to the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) an application to transfer into trust approximately 63.1 acres of land known as the Pawhuska Property (Site) in Osage County, Oklahoma, for gaming and other purposes.1 The Nation will relocate its existing Pawhuska facility to the Site, and develop approximately 17 acres of the Site with a casino and hotel (Proposed Project). The Nation also submitted a request for a determination whether the Nation is eligible to conduct gaming on the Site. The Proposed Project would replace the Nation's existing Pawhuska Osage Casino in Osage County. The Nation intends to close the existing casino and relocate it to the Site operating approximately 300 feet directly across Highway 99/60. We have completed our review of the Nation's request, the Regional Director's Findings of Fact,2 and the documentation in the record. As discussed below, it is my determination that the Department of the Interior (Department) will transfer the Site into trust for the benefit of the Nation pursuant to Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA).3 Once transferred into trust, the Nation may conduct gaming on the Site pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA).4 Background In 1870, Congress removed and relocated the Osage people from their lands in Kansas, which were then sold, to lands in the Indian Territory in present-day Oklahoma.5 There, Congress established the boundaries of the Nation's Reservation in 1872, consisting of approximately 1.47 million acres, which subsequently became part of the Oklahoma Territory in 1890.6 1 See Letter from Property Manager, Osage Nation, to Robin Philips, Superintendent, Osage Agency (Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Foundation of American Indian Education
    History and Foundation of American Indian Education Written by Stan Juneau Revised and Updated by Walter Fleming and Lance Foster Indian Education for All Division 2001/rev. 2012-2013 History and Foundation of American Indian Education Written by Stan Juneau Revised and Updated by Walter Fleming and Lance Foster Indian Education for All Division 2001/rev. 2012-2013 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: Traditional Indian Education and European Intrusion (1492-1787) 4 Traditional Indian Education 5 Indians in Montana 6 An Intrusion Process: Involuntary Minorities 7 Chapter Two: Federalism and the Indian Treaty Period (1787-1871) 9 Legal Foundations 10 The Constitution and the Commerce Clause 10 Indian Treaties and Education 11 Indian Treaties in Montana 12 End of Treaty Period 12 Effects of Treaties on Indian Lands and Education 13 Chapter Three: The Indian Boarding School (1617-Present) 17 Missionary Period (1500s-1800s) 18 Federal Period (1800s-Present) 19 The Federal Boarding School System 19 Carlisle Indian School 20 Boarding Schools in Montana 23 Indian Boarding Schools Today 25 Chapter Four: The Allotment Period (1887-1934) 28 Property as a Basis of Western Societies 29 The Dawes Act of 1887 (General Allotment Act) 30 The Allotment Period in Montana 30 Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 31 The Meriam Report of 1928 31 Chapter Five: Tribal Reorganization Period (1934-1953) 34 The Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934 35 Tribal Constitutions 36 The Johnson-O’Malley Act of 1934 37 The Reorganization Period in Montana 38 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • American Indians in Oklahoma OKLAHOMA HISTORY CENTER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
    American Indians in Oklahoma OKLAHOMA HISTORY CENTER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Nawa! That means hello in the Pawnee language. In Oklahoma, thirty-eight federally recognized tribes represent about 8 percent of the population. Most of these tribes came from places around the country but were removed from their homelands to Oklahoma in the nineteenth century. Their diverse cultures and rich heritage make Oklahoma (which combines the Choctaw words “okla” and “huma,” or “territory of the red people”) a special state. American Indians have impacted Oklahoma’s growth from territory to statehood and have made it into the great state it is today. This site allows you to learn more about American Indian tribes in Oklahoma. First, read the background pages for more information, then go through the biographies of influential American Indians to learn more about him or her. The activities section has coloring sheets, games, and other activities, which can be done as part of a group or on your own. Map of Indian Territory prior to 1889 (ITMAP.0035, Oklahoma Historical Society Map Collection, OHS). American Indians │2016 │1 Before European Contact The first people living on the prairie were the ancestors of various American Indian tribes. Through archaeology, we know that the plains have been inhabited for centuries by groups of people who lived in semi-permanent villages and depended on planting crops and hunting animals. Many of the ideas we associate with American Indians, such as the travois, various ceremonies, tipis, earth lodges, and controlled bison hunts, come from these first prairie people. Through archaeology, we know that the ancestors of the Wichita and Caddo tribes have been in present-day Oklahoma for more than two thousand years.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Bear.Pdf
    1 Standing Bear v. The United States In 1877, Chief Standing Bear of the Ponca Tribe lived in an 800 square foot house he built of lumber he cut and sawed himself. The house had windows, furniture, heating stoves, and a pantry full of dishes. He was a Christian, dressed in American clothing and raised crops and livestock. His net worth probably exceeded $150,000 in today’s money. Two years later he was arrested as a fugitive and sued General George Crook of the United States Army for his release. Standing Bear’s lawsuit was the first step on the tortuous road of American Indian rights that still winds on today. Who are the Ponca? The Ponca are an offshoot of the Omaha, speaking a dialect of the same Siouan-rooted language as the Omaha. The Omaha are believed to have migrated from the lower Great Lakes and Ohio Valley to the Missouri River valley of Iowa and Nebraska prior to the 1700s. At this time, they moved farther into Nebraska in response to pressure from the Lakota as they were pressured in turn by the Ojibwa who were acquiring European weapons. As they moved up the Missouri, they displaced the Arikara and learned earthlodge building. They were a semi-nomadic tribe, living in tipis during their buffalo hunts, and in earthlodge villages while they farmed. In the early 1700s, they also acquired their first horses, probably by trade with the Comanche, approximately the same time they separated from the Omaha. The separation was apparently an amicable one, as the two tribes maintained friendly relationships and frequently intermarried.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Bear and the Ponca: a Forgotten Legacy
    International Social Science Review Volume 96 Issue 1 Article 4 Standing Bear and the Ponca: A Forgotten Legacy Chace Hutchison Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr Part of the American Studies Commons, Geography Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, Legal Commons, Political Science Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hutchison, Chace () "Standing Bear and the Ponca: A Forgotten Legacy," International Social Science Review: Vol. 96 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr/vol96/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Social Science Review by an authorized editor of Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. Standing Bear and the Ponca: A Forgotten Legacy Cover Page Footnote Chace Hutchison is a senior at Wayne State College where he majors in secondary social science education. This article is available in International Social Science Review: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr/vol96/ iss1/4 Hutchison: Standing Bear and the Ponca Standing Bear and the Ponca: A Forgotten Legacy The story of Standing Bear and the Ponca tribe stands as one of the most significant Native American ordeals in United States history. In 1879, Standing Bear v. Crook cemented the rights of Native Americans into U.S. law. This event is one of the most undervalued and lesser- known happenings in our nation’s history. The fight for equality by minorities is a well-known American narrative, dating back centuries. For Native Americans, Standing Bear v.
    [Show full text]