DOCSLIB.ORG

A Brief History of the False Memory Research of Elizabeth Loftus : S.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Brief History of the False Memory Research of Elizabeth Loftus : S.M A Brief History of the False Memory Research of Elizabeth Loftus : S.M.... http://ritualabuse.us/research/memory-fms/a-brief-history-of-the-false-m... Home Newsletter Conferences Ritual Abuse Mind Control Related Research Contact A Brief History of the False Memory Research of Elizabeth Loftus A Brief History of the False Memory Research of Elizabeth Loftus Lynn Crook, M.Ed. The lost- in- a-shopping-mall study (Loftus and Pickrell, 1995) provided initial scientific support for the claim that child sexual abuse accusations are false memories planted by therapists. However, the mall study researchers faced a problem early on—the participants could tell the difference between the true and false memories. 1989 – Washington State became the first to allow adults who recovered long-buried memories of child sexual abuse to file lawsuits to recover damages. Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, a psychology professor at the University of Washington who testified as an expert on eyewitness testimony, described the challenge these lawsuits presented for psychologists. “The challenge,” she said, was to show that “an entirely false, traumatic memory” could be planted in someone’s mind. (See: http://www.fathom.com/feature/60814/ ) 1992 – James Coan, a student of Loftus’, was assigned as chief co-investigator for the mall study. The subjects’ family members were asked to provide Coan with three true childhood stories about the subjects, and to describe a typical family shopping trip. Based on the shopping trip descriptions, a false story was created for each subject about getting lost as a child during a shopping trip. (See: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Papers/Py104 /loftus.mem.html ) The subjects were informed that their family members said the events “had happened.” (See: http://faculty.washington.edu/eloftus/Articles/IssuesInScienceTechnology02%20vol%2018.pdf ) The participants were asked to repeat the stories and to try to remember more details. Finally, the subjects were told one of the memories was false, and asked to choose the false memory (Loftus and Pickrell, p. 722). 1993 – The first indication the study might not live up to the challenge became public in 1993. 1 מתוך 7 A Brief History of the False Memory Research of Elizabeth Loftus : S.M.... http://ritualabuse.us/research/memory-fms/a-brief-history-of-the-false-m... Coan reported in his honors thesis that six subjects had completed the study, and “all subjects were able to correctly identify the false memory.” (Coan, 1993, p. 16.) Coan was assigned to another professor, and Loftus appointed Jacqueline Pickrell, Maryanne Garry and Chuck Manning to conduct the study. In a January 24, 1994, deposition for Crook v. Murphy, attorney Barbara Jo Levy asked Loftus, “If you are asked to testify about your experiments of implanting false memories, would you use those first six?” Loftus replied, “No, I don’t think I will use the first six” (Transcript, p. 61). 1994 – The mall study was completed in 1994. Loftus reported the results at a conference: “About 10 percent of adults [2 of the 24 subjects] will come up with a specific elaborated memory.” (See: http://query.nytimes.com /gst/fullpage.html?res=9F07E6DD133BF932A05756C0A962958260 ) Loftus also reported the 2-subject finding in a status report to the University of Washington Human Subjects Committee dated June 1, 1994: “24 subjects have been run. About “8-9% [2] have formed false positive memories.” NOTE: The 2-subject finding may not be accurate. The two subjects are mentioned on page 723 of the mall study. The first subject is described as “convinced.” However, according to Loftus, Feldman and Dashiell (1995), this subject recounted to the researchers what appears to be an actual experience of getting lost at K-Mart, and then went on to correct the false memory she was told. (See: http://www.culthelp.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view& id=1065&Itemid=17 ) Although Loftus et al.(1995) say the subject “embraced much of the information, and expanded upon it,” this does not appear to be the case. The second subject is described as “misled.” Yet when she was asked to choose the false memory, she chose the mall memory (Loftus and Pickrell, p. 723). Thus, it appears that no false memories were planted in the mall study. (Crook, 2008, United Nations Conference). 1995 – In June, evidence of possible research misconduct in an earlier study was reported in a journal of the American Psychological Association. Koss, Tromp and Tharan (1995, p. 120) demonstrated that the data in Loftus and Burns (1982, p. 320) did not support the authors’ claim that “those who saw the mentally shocking version showed poorer retention of the details of the films” (Loftus and Burns, p. 318). Instead, the data indicated poorer retention for one unimportant detail. (See: https://webfiles.uci.edu/eloftus/LoftusBurns_MemoryCog82.pdf?uniq=13yvu9 ) In December, two women filed ethics complaints against Loftus with the American Psychological Association claiming she had misrepresented their successful recalled memory lawsuits to the media. (See: www.astraeasweb.net/politics/loftus.html ) In December, the mall study was published. The 2-subject findings reported in 1994 became five subjects in the published study. Loftus and Pickrell (1995, p. 723) reported: “Of the 24 total, 19 subjects correctly chose the getting-lost memory as the false one, while the remaining five incorrectly thought that one of the true events was the false one.” The authors concluded, “These findings reveal that people can be led to believe that entire events happened to them after suggestions to that effect” (Loftus and Pickrell, p. 723). (See: http://faculty.washington.edu/eloftus/Articles/IssuesInScienceTechnology02%20vol%2018.pdf ) Loftus reports the 5-subject finding in her expert witness testimony. 1996 – In 1996, Loftus began criticizing the character, rather than the ideas, of those who questioned her ideas. In January, Loftus resigned from the American Psychological Association. As a result, the Association did not investigate the two ethics complaints. In April, Barbara Jo Levy and others (unnamed by the News) said in their response to Loftus’ article in the Washington State Bar News: “These studies [we cited] demonstrate time and time 2 מתוך 7 A Brief History of the False Memory Research of Elizabeth Loftus : S.M.... http://ritualabuse.us/research/memory-fms/a-brief-history-of-the-false-m... again that a personally experienced traumatic event may result in partial or total memory less of the traumatic event. Loftus herself was victim to such a traumatic memory loss, as she describes it on page 149 of her book, Witness for the Defense .” Loftus replied to Levy and the others: “The lack of common decency shown by Levy et al. in raising the subject of my own experience at age 6 of sexual abuse by a baby-sitter is beyond measure. Why Levy chose to mislead readers by distorting the description of my experience would only be speculation” (Loftus, 1996). In June, at a NATO conference, Loftus told a colleague to stop defending one of the women who filed an ethics complaint against her. (See: http://www.rememberingdangerously.com/ ) In July, testifying as an expert in Turner v. Honker, Loftus commented on Charles Whitfield (“he makes stuff up,” p. 84), Karen Olio (she’s a therapist who has been harassing me for years,” p. 142) and Bessel van der Kolk (“acted nice to me and then said some, unfair and nasty things…he misbehaved,” p. 153). (Transcript) Loftus commented on the ethics of Ken Pope in Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice . A year later, the journal published a correction and an apology for Loftus’ “false statement disparaging Dr. Pope’s ethics.” (Correction notice and apology, 1997) 1997 - The raw data from the mall study were subpoenaed by the defense in Burgus v. Braun et al . Loftus obtained a gag order for data. The case settled on October 31, 1997, and the data were returned to Loftus. Pezdek, Finger, Hodge (1997) planted false memories of getting lost in a mall in three subjects, and failed to convince subjects they had an enema as a child. This study is often cited as a replication of the mall study, even though the participants were interviewed by family members, not researchers. The findings provide evidence to suggest that a family member may be able to plant a false memory of child sexual abuse in another family member if the incident is perceived as only mildly frightening, and the incident is combined with a familiar event (such as a typical family shopping trip). In May, David Corwin and Erna Olafson published a case study of a videotaped, spontaneously- recovered memory of child sexual abuse (Corwin and Olafson, 1997). The videotape provided evidence to suggest that a repressed memory of childhood abuse could be recalled. (See http://data.memberclicks.com/site/apsac/jane_doe.pdf). Loftus hired Shapiro Investigations to assist in the investigation, and travelled to California to interview Doe’s family members, allegedly introducing herself as the supervisor of David Corwin whom Jane Doe knew and trusted. In 1999, Jane Doe filed an ethics complaint against Loftus with the University of Washington. In July 2001, the University completed a 20-month investigation during which Loftus was not allowed to discuss the case. The University required Loftus to complete an ethics course and to restrict her relationship with Jane Doe’s mother. In June 2002, Loftus was hired by the University of California at Irvine as a Distinguished Professor. In 2002, Loftus and Melvin Guyer published “Who Abused Jane Doe?” in the Skeptical Inquirer. (See: http://faculty.washington.edu/eloftus/Articles/JaneDoe.htm ) In February 2003, Nicole Taus (Jane Doe) filed a lawsuit against Elizabeth Loftus, Melvin Guyer, Carol Tavris, Shapiro Investigations, Skeptical Inquirer, Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), and the University of Washington charging invasion of privacy, defamation libel per se, and slander per se, negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress and damages.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CHILD MALTREATMENT Journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children
    CHILD MALTREATMENT Journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children Editor-in-Chief Mark Chaffin, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK Associate Editors Veronica Abney, UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute, John Myers, University of the Pacific, McGeorge Los Angeles, CA School of Law, Sacramento, CA Lucy Berliner, Harborview Sexual Assault Center, Theresa Reid, Chicago, IL Seattle, WA Charles Wilson, Center for Child Protection, David Finkelhor, University of New Hampshire, San Diego, CA Durham, NH Book Review Editor Dan Smith, Medical Univerisity of South Carolina Consulting Editors David Kolko, Western Psychiatric Institute, Barbara Boat, University of Cincinnati, OH University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA Barbara Bonner, University of Oklahoma Health John Landsverk, Center for Child Protection, Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK San Diego, CA Bette Bottoms, University of Illinois–Chicago, IL Ken Lanning, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Judith Cohen, Allegheny University Hospitals/ Quantico, VA Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA Elizabeth LeTourneau, Medical University of David Corwin, University of Cincinnati, OH South Carolina, Charleston, SC Ted Cross, University of New Hampshire, NH Anthony Mannarino, Allegheny University Hospitals/ Constance Dalenberg, California School of Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA Professional Psychology, San Diego, CA William Murphy, University of Tennessee Medical Deborah Daro, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL Center, Memphis,
    [Show full text]
  • An Evidence-Based Approach for Estimating Present and Future Damages from Child Sexual Abuse
    REGULAR ARTICLE An Evidence-Based Approach for Estimating Present and Future Damages From Child Sexual Abuse William Bernet, MD, and David Corwin, MD This article illustrates the use of evidence-based practice to develop conclusions for a forensic report. The authors present a case vignette in which an early adolescent boy was sexually abused by an employee of a private school, and a lawsuit ensued. They explain how to utilize relevant research regarding the prognosis of victims of sexual abuse to address the forensic issues of psychological injury and future damages. It is notable that the two authors, who have at times testified on opposite sides of similar cases, were able to agree on conclusions that were based on relevant published research. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 34:224–30, 2006 During the past decade, practitioners of forensic sci- and reliable. Both EBP and Daubert share the goal of ence have observed remarkably similar trends in law improving the use of scientific knowledge in their and medicine. Both professions have strived to base respective fields of medicine and law. operational decisions on scientific evidence rather If expert witnesses rely on scientific research rather than on subjective opinion. In psychiatry and the rest than their own hunches and speculations, there pre- of medicine, this movement has taken the form of sumably will be less variation among expert opinions. evidence-based medicine or evidence-based practice In fact, in some instances it should be possible for (EBP). We are using EBP in a broad sense to include opposing experts to agree on how the scientific evi- defining a clinical or forensic problem in a precise dence addresses a particular legal question.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing, Assessing & Treating Trauma Across The
    PREVENTING,PRE ASSESSING & TREATING TRAUMA ACROSS THE LIFESPAN 14thth HAWAI`I INTERNATIONAL SUMMIT March 27-30, 2017 Hawai`i Convention Center | 1801 Kalakaua Ave, Honolulu, HI 96815 Presented by: Institute on Violence, Abuse & Trauma Ho`omaluhia - Family Violence & Sexual Assault Institute, Hawai`i Branch National Partnership to End Interpersonal Violence Across the Lifespan Catholic Charities Hawai`i Child & Adolescent Mental Health Division-Hawai`i Argosy University Hawai`i Preliminary Co-Sponsors Academy on Violence & Abuse Kahi Mohala Sutter Behavioral Health Consuelo Foundation Parents & Children Together Family Programs Hawai`i Project Laulima Hawai`i State Department of Health Taylor & Francis Hawai`i State Department of Human National Association of Social Workers- Services California Chapter Hawai`i State Department of Education Becker Communications Preliminary Collaborators American Association for Marriage & Family Therapy, Hawai`i State Coalition Against Domestic Violence Hawai`i (AAMFT-HI) Institute on Domestic Violence in the African American American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children Community (APSAC) International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies Association of Traumatic Stress Specialists International Society for the Study of Trauma & Bellows Consulting Dissociation California School of Professional Psychology, Alliant MaleSurvivor: The National Organization Against International University Male Sexual Victimization Catholic Charities Hawai`i Minnesota Coalition for Battered Women Catholic Social Services Diocese of Samoa Pago Pago National Sexual Violence Resource Center Center for Contextual Change Parents and Children Together (PACT) Chaminade University of Honolulu P.A.R.E.N.T.S. Inc. Chicago School of Professional Psychology Promoting Awareness, Victim Empowerment (PAVE) Children’s Institute Inc. Prevent Child Abuse Hawai`i County of San Diego-Aging & Independence Sex Abuse Treatment Center (SACT) Engage Asia Stop The Silence, Stop Child Sexual Abuse Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Sexual Abuse Case Reports: Importance, Misuse, Ethical and Legal Issues
    CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE CASE REPORTS: IMPORTANCE, MISUSE, ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES Nicole (Taus) Kluemper, Ph.D. DISCLAIMER: It is not my place to pass judgment. I am here to tell the facts of the story as I recall them and to allow you to make of them what you will. I share my impressions as a means of providing the perspective of a subject whose identity was uncovered and exploited. BACKGROUND INFORMATION • My parents divorced when I was a young child. • I made allegations of sexual abuse against my biological mother. • David Corwin, M.D. was appointed by the court to conduct a custody evaluation. • During his interviews with me, he video recorded my telling of the alleged abuse. BACKGROUND CONTINUED • When I was 16 years old, my father passed away. • I had regained some contact with my biological mother, but was living in a foster home. • Foster mom and biological mom had a falling out, causing biological mom to leave my life again. • I felt confused and alone, and wanted to understand what had gone on in my early life that I had arrived at a place without my father or my biological mother. BACKGROUND CONTINUED • Before my dad died, Dr. Corwin contacted my father who was in a convalescent home at the time, and who gave Dr. Corwin my phone number. • Dr. Corwin called me, and after agreeing to allow him to show the videos of me in order to help other kids, I asked to send me the videos of myself at 5 and 6 years old.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Pediatrics Faculty Orientation Program
    DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRICS FACULTY ORIENTATION PROGRAM Improving the lives of children through excellence in advocacy, education, research and clinical care. Department of Pediatrics Overview Department of Pediatrics University of Utah School of Medicine Mission: Improving the lives of children through excellence in advocacy, education, research and clinical care. Vision: Caring for children, caring for their future. The Department of Pediatrics is the second largest department in the University of Utah School of Medicine and one of the largest pediatric departments in the country. The department is organized in a matrix, and is comprised of 19 medical divisions and four programs operating within four key enterprises: Education, Research, Clinical, and Academic. Divisions provide a full spectrum of specialty and sub-specialty pediatric services for children throughout the Intermountain West. The Education Enterprise, directed by Dr. Jim Bale, coordinates programs from the medical school, residency and post-graduate programs, and continuing medical education. In addition to supporting our 85 pediatric residents (categorical, med/peds and triple board programs) and our 42 fellows, the enterprise manages the Glasgow Service, a ward team of four third-year medical students supervised by a senior pediatric resident. Over the past five years, 10-15% of University of Utah medical school graduates have chosen pediatric careers. The Education Enterprise conducts a bi-annual review of resident performance and an annual review of faculty proficiency in education. The Academic Pediatric Education & Leadership program (APEL), provides support to faculty who wish to improve their skills as an educator and leader. An annual forum, “Education in Progress” provides faculty with useful educational strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • AVA Blueprint
    Building Academic Capacity and Expertise in the Health Effects of Violence and Abuse A B L U E P R I N T FOR ADVANCING PROFESSIONAL HEALTH EDUCATION ACADEMY ON VIOLENCE AND ABUSE (AVA) MISSION The mission of the Academy on Violence and Abuse (AVA) is to advance health education and research on the prevention, recognition, treatment, and health effects of violence and abuse. VISION By expanding health education and research, AVA will integrate knowledge about violence and abuse into the training of health professionals, promote the health of all people, protect the most vulnerable, and advance health policy that promotes safe families, workplaces, and communities. AVA LEADERSHIP Board Chair: Board of Directors: F. David Schneider, MD, MSPH David Corwin, MD Tasneem Ismailji, MD, MPH President: Lisa James, MA David McCollum, MD Susan Kelley, PhD Richard Krugman, MD President-Elect: Connie Mitchell, MD, MPH Robert Block, MD Charles Mouton, MD, MS, FAAFP Philip Scribano, DO, MSCE Secretary: Amy Sisley, MD, MPH Bruce Ettinger, MD, MPH Zita Surprenant, MD Treasurer: Ellen Taliaferro, MD Marie Christensen, MD, FACS Former Board Members: Executive Director: Elaine Alpert, MD, MPH Michael Callahan Jacqueline C. Campbell, PhD, RN Jacqueline Hauser, MBA Debbie Lee Therese Zink, MD, MPH To contact or become a member of the Academy on Violence and Abuse: Mailing address: 14850 Scenic Heights Road, Suite 135A Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Email: [email protected] Website: www.avahealth.org Building Academic Capacity and Expertise in the Health Effects of Violence
    [Show full text]
  • “Here Or to Go?”
    EDITORIAL pISSN 1225-729X / eISSN 2233-9183 J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2017;28(1):1-1 https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.2017.28.1.1 “Here or To Go?” Geon Ho Bahn Editor-in-Chief, Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Once there was a Korean postdoctoral researcher who was versity, Korea, and Professor David Corwin. Dr. Corwin is a an outstanding student, kind to his peers, and even practiced board certified child and adolescent psychiatrist, an interna- conversation in English all year long before moving to the tionally well-known expert of long-term impact of child vio- United States. On the first day he moved to the US, he went lence and abuse on health, the vice president of American to McDonald’s to eat. Little did he know, that was the last Professional Society on the Abuse of Children and the board day of his life. He was allegedly shot by the cashier after an chair of the AVA. The first paper was submitted by Susie Wiet argument between them. During the investigation for the entitled “Origins of addiction predictably embedded in child- shooting, the cashier said that he was ridiculed by the stu- hood trauma: a neurobiological review”, and the author in- dent. He asked the student “Here or to go?” and the student vestigated the pathways of emotional, cognitive, and behav- repeatedly said, “Yes!” The thing is, the researcher has learned ioral disturbances related with chronic stress and childhood English for many years but he never learned the phrase “Here adversities.
    [Show full text]
  • The High Cost of Skepticism
    This article chronicles the tribulations noted psychologists Elizabeth Loftus and Melvin Guyer were put through for conduct- ing the investigation that is the subject of their ttvo-part article "Who Abused Jane Doe?" concluding in this issue of the SKEPTICAL INQUIRER (Pages 37-40).—The Editor The High Cost of Skepticism Here's what happened to two scientists who believed that tenure and the First Amendment would protect their rights to free inquiry. CAROL TAVRIS n the olden days, perhaps twenty or thirty years ago, aca- demic debates were marked by sweet discourse and the Iharmonious if impassioned hum of debate. (Also by sar- casm.) The rule used to be that if you disagreed with some- one's opinion or interpretations of data, you did the civilized thing—you called the person a knucklehead or an incompe- tent fool. Or you wrote a devastating reply explaining why the knucklehead was terminally wrong, misguided, or drunk. That was then. Just as noise trumps silence and rage trumps courtesy, the cudgel of lawsuits to silence or cower the opposition trumps free debate. In universities across the country, lawsuits, even spurious and unsuccessful ones, have weakened the once-sacrosanct guarantees to scholars of free SKEPTICAL INQUIRER luly/August 2002 41 speech and association. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) The Atlantic had conducted such an investigation, you would and Human Subjects Committees have proliferated, to protect know the city and state of all of the individuals interviewed, human subjects from harm caused by unethical scientists— their names (unless they requested anonymity), the data bases and to protect universities from any lawsuits that might ensue.
    [Show full text]
  • Children, Sports, and Sexual Predators: Ten Commandments for Parents to Follow
    legal notes By Daniel Pollack Children, Sports, and Sexual Predators: Ten Commandments for Parents to Follow ymnastics. Soccer. Swimming. GSkating. Whatever the sport, even the nicest parents can lose their cool when they’re rooting for their own child. To remind parents that good sportsmanship really is more impor- tant than winning, youth sport leagues have developed codes of conduct for parents. These usually mention things like not arguing or getting physical with the offi cials, coaches, or other parents; not cursing; and not heaping blame on anyone if your child’s team loses. These rules of conduct are usually so obvious that they hardly need to be spelled out. Other rules for parents of children involved in com- petitive sports are not so obvious. The tragic sexual, physical, and emotional abuse of more than 300 children involving Dr. Larry Nassar, USA Gymnastics national team doctor and an osteopathic physician at Michigan State University, was a wake-up call to the entire sports world. It should also alert parents to be vigilant in protecting their children trusted with your child. Winning is not an environment that does not stress from such predators. Here is a set of everything. “winning at any cost.” Choose one that “Ten Commandments” for parents to 3. Do not allow the coach, trainer, is it mindful that a child’s self-esteem ensure their children steer clear of a or doctor to ridicule or shame and emotional health come fi rst. coach, trainer, or doctor who is really a your child. You know the diff erence 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence and Abuse: What Child Psychiatrists Need to Know
    GUEST EDITORIAL pISSN 1225-729X / eISSN 2233-9183 J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2017;28(1):2-3 https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.2017.28.1.2 Violence and Abuse: What Child Psychiatrists Need to Know David L. Corwin Guest Editor, Board Chair, Academy of Violence and Abuse In this issue, are the first three of five reviews addressing edge summarized in their review is essential to child psychi- various aspects of childhood trauma and maltreatment in- atrists wishing to provide evidence-informed care for the trau- vited as part of a collaboration between the Korean Academy matized youth they evaluate and treat. of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (KACAP) and the Acad- Joan Durrant, PhD and Ron Ensom have led efforts in emy on Violence and Abuse (AVA). The AVA is a global inter- Canada to end the corporal punishment of children. In their professional society dedicated to promoting increased aware- review of the last 25 years of research on corporal punish- ness and skill among health professionals about the relationship ment, they acknowledge the Republic of Korea’s 1991 ratifi- between violence and abuse and adverse health impacts across cation of the United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of the the life-course. Child (CRC) and subsequent legislation to end corporal pun- The first of these reviews is by Susie Wiet, MD, a child, ad- ishment.3) Indeed, the Republic of Korea made this policy olescent, adult psychiatrist, who is also boarded in addiction shift early among the world’s nations. Since the completion medicine. She addresses the role of childhood trauma in the of their manuscript, two more countries, Paraguay and Slo- development of addiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Delegates from 75 Nations Attend the 14Th International Congress
    r--. The Official Newsletter of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect (ISPCAN) 25 W. 560 Geneva Road, Suite L2C, Carol Stream, IL 60188 U.S.A. Volume 11, Number 3 Northern Fall/ Southern Spring 2002 FOCUS TOPIC: International Congress Delegates from 75 Nations Attend the National Partners 14th International Congress Meet in Denver he ISPCAN National Partners met at ith a deep respect for past accomplishments and,an eye toward the 14th International Congress, held the challenges ahead, more than 900 child abuse prevention T in Denver, Colorado, in early July, to professionals gathered in Denver, Colorado, in July to exchange ideas and discuss issues of w common concern In 1999, lSPCAN launched participate in the 14th International Congress on Child Abuse and Neglect . the National Partner Program, establishing Co~sponsored by ISPCAN, the Kempe Children's Foundation, and the Kempe affiliations with national child abuse and Children's Center, the event offered participants opportunities .to share their neglect prevention organizations around the own knowledge, to learn from others and to build stronger relationships with world to further the common mission of colleagues from around the wotld. ISPCAN and its; 14 organ izations have joined this program, Under the theme "Charting Our Progress Toward Protection of Children • WorldWide," the four-day meeting began with a pre-Congress forum for repre­ Getting to know you sentatives from developing countries. Topics covered during this forum At the beginning of the
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Abuse I in Child Custody & I Visitation I Situations
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ---~. "'rY,,~.. ;" •.-_.""....""~ if' • Think I Tank 'I Report I Allegations I of I Sexual Abuse I in Child Custody & I Visitation I Situations 1//i, i) b - eJ/- ? I f"lf:J- ,.,' I' ;,1 II .~:.' // :?"I t") I .~ :I~ I The National "Resource Center I ~. on Child Sexual Abuse .. d b I I I -I copyright 1990, by the National Children's Advocacy Center, I Huntsville, AL. Distributed by the National Resource center on Child Sexual Abuse, Alabama Branch, 106 Lincoln st., Huntsville, AL 35801. I Originally recorded and transcribed by Robert E. Stamper, Stamper & Bufford Reporting Service, 112 South Side Square, suite E, I Huntsville, AL 35801 Edited by David W. Lloyd I Printed by Golden Rule printing, Huntsville, AL I This publication was supported by grant 90-CA-1359 from the National center on Child Abuse and Neglect, Office of Human Development services, u.s. Dept. of Health & Human Services. The I opinions expressed herein are those of the National Resource Center on Child Sexual Abuse, but do not necessarily represent the views of the National Center on child Abuse and Neglect, or the Office of Human Development Services, u.s. Dept. of Health & I Human Services. I I I I I .. I I I -------------- --------- I ALLEGATIONS OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE I IN CUSTODY AND VISITATION SITUATIONS PAGE I Moderators: Robert E. "Bud" Cramer, Jr., Esq. 1 President, National Resource Center on Child Sexual Abuse I 106 Lincoln st. Huntsville, Alabama Howard Pohl, Esq.
    [Show full text]